Role of Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Genitourinary Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of oligometastatic genitourinary cancers is a rapidly advancing field with ablative radiotherapy as one of the critical treatment components. The oligometastatic disease state, which can be defined as 1-5 metastatic sites with a controlled primary, represents a distinct clinical state where comprehensive ablative local therapies may provide improved outcomes. Enhanced imaging has increased the number of patients identified with oligometastatic disease. Evidence for improved outcomes with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic genitourinary cancers is increasing, and previously published outcome data continues to mature with an increasing body of prospective data to inform the role of MDT in histology-specific settings or in the context of systemic therapy. In select patients, MDT can offer benefits beyond improved local control and allow for time off of systemic therapy, prolonged time until next therapy, or even the hope of cure. However, treatment decisions for locally ablative therapy must be balanced with consideration towards safety. There are exciting advances in technologies to target and adapt treatment in real-time which have expanded options for safer delivery and dose escalation to metastatic targets near critical organs at risk. The role of systemic therapies in conjunction with MDT and incorporation of tumor genetic information to further refine prognostication and treatment decision-making in the oligometastatic setting is actively being investigated. These developments highlight the evolving field of treatment of oligometastatic disease. Future prospective studies combining MDT with enhanced imaging and integrating MDT with evolving systemic therapies will enable the optimal selection of patients most likely to benefit from this "all-or-none" approach and reveal settings in which a combination of therapies could result in synergistic outcomes.

Multi-institutional Analysis of Metastasis-directed Therapy with or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is increasingly being used in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). However, it is currently unclear how to optimally integrate MDT with the standard of care of systemic hormonal therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term outcomes of MDT alone versus MDT and a defined course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in omCSPC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Here, a multicenter, international retrospective cohort of omCSPC as defined by conventional imaging was reported.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant progression-free survival (dPFS), and combined biochemical or distant progression-free survival (cPFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 263 patients were included, 105 with MDT + ADT and 158 with MDT alone. The majority of patients had metachronous disease (90.5%). Five-year bPFS, dPFS, and cPFS were, respectively, 24%, 41%, and 19% in patients treated with MDT + ADT and 11% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.64), 29% (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78), and 9% (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.67) in patients treated with MDT alone. On a multivariable analysis adjusting for pretreatment variables, the use of ADT was associated with improved bPFS (HR 0.43, p < 0.001), dPFS (HR 0.45, p = 0.002), and cPFS (HR 0.44, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multi-institutional report, the addition of concurrent ADT to MDT appears to improve time to prostate-specific antigen progression and distant recurrence, noting that about 10% patients had durable control with MDT alone. Ongoing phase 3 studies will help further define treatment options for omCSPC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Here, we report a large retrospective review evaluating the outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy with or without a limited course of androgen deprivation for patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. This international multi-institutional review demonstrates that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves progression-free survival. While a proportion of patients appear to have long-term disease control with MDT alone, further work in biomarker discovery is required to better identify which patients would be appropriate for de-escalated therapy.

A Prospective Study Assessing the Efficacy and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Bone Metastases

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising treatment for oligometastatic disease in bone because of its delivery of high dose to target tissue and minimal dose to surrounding tissue. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this treatment in patients with previously unirradiated oligometastatic bony disease.

Methods and Materials

In this prospective phase II trial, patients with oligometastatic bone disease, defined as ≤3 active sites of disease, were treated with SBRT at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Center and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between December 2016 and May 2019. SBRT dose and fractionation regimen were not protocol mandated. Local progression-free survival, progression-free survival, prostatic specific antigen progression, and overall survival were reported. Treatment-related toxicity was also reported.

Results

A total of 98 patients and 126 lesions arising from various tumor histologies were included in this study. The median age of patients enrolled was 72.8 years (80.6% male, 19.4% female). Median follow-up was 26.7 months. The most common histology was prostate cancer (68.4%, 67/98). The most common dose prescriptions were 27/30 Gy in 3 fractions (27.0%, 34/126), 30 Gy in 5 fractions (16.7%, 21/126), or 30/35 Gy in 5 fractions (16.7%, 21/126). Multiple doses per treatment regimen reflect dose painting employing the lower dose to the clinical target volume and higher dose to the gross tumor volume. Four patients (4.1%, 4/98) experienced local progression at 1 site for each patient (3.2%, 4/126). Among the entire cohort, 2-year local progression-free survival (including death without local progression) was 84.8%, 2-year progression-free survival (including deaths as well as local, distant, and prostatic specific antigen progression) was 47.5%, and 2-year overall survival was 87.3%. Twenty-six patients (26.5%, 26/98) developed treatment-related toxicities.

Conclusions

Our study supports existing literature in showing that SBRT is effective and tolerable in patients with oligometastatic bone disease. Larger phase III trials are necessary and reasonable to determine long-term efficacy and toxicities.

Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Femur Metastases for Oligometastatic Disease Control or Reirradiation: Results From a Large Single-Institution Experience

Purpose

There are limited data regarding outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for femur metastases, which was an exclusion criteria for the Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers (SABR-COMET) trial. We aimed to characterize clinical outcomes from a large single institution experience.

Methods and Materials

Forty-eight patients with 53 lesions were consecutively treated with femur SBRT from May 2017 to June 2022. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used to characterize time-to-event endpoints and associations between baseline factors and clinical outcomes, respectively. Local control and locoregional control were defined as the absence of tumor progression within the radiation treatment field or within the treated femur, respectively.

Results

Most patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 (90%), prostate (52%) or breast/lung (17%) cancer, and 1 to 3 lesions (100%), including 29 proximal and 5 distal. Fifty-seven percent of the lesions were treated with concurrent systemic therapy. Median planning target volume was 49.1 cc (range, 6.6-387 cc). Planning target volume V100 (%) was 99% (range, 90-100). Fractionation included 18 to 20 Gy/1F, 27 to 30 Gy/3F, and 28.5-40 Gy/5F. Forty-two percent had Mirels score ≥7 and most (94%) did not have extraosseous extension. Acute toxicities included grade 1 fatigue (15%), pain flare (7.5%), nausea (3.8%), and decreased blood counts (1.9%). Late toxicities included fracture (1.9%) at 1.5 years and osteonecrosis (4%) from dose of 40 Gy in 5F and 30 Gy in 5F (after prior 30 Gy/10F). One patient (2%) required fixation postradiation for progressive pain. With median follow-up 19.4 months, 1- and 2-year rates of local control were 94% and 89%, locoregional control was 83% and 67%, progression-free survival were 56% and 25%, and overall survival were 91% and 73%. Fifty percent of local regional recurrence events occurred within 5 cm of gross tumor volume.

Conclusions

Femur SBRT for oligometastatic disease control in well-selected patients was associated with good outcomes with minimal rates of acute and late toxicity. Patterns of local regional recurrence warrant consideration of larger elective volume coverage. Additional prospective study is needed.

Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Benefits of a Novel Tattoo-less Workflow for Nonspine Bone Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Integrating Surface-Guidance With Triggered Imaging Reduces Treatment Time and Eliminates the Need for Tattoos

PURPOSE

Oligometastatic disease has expanded the indications for nonspine bone stereotactic body radiation therapy (NSB SBRT). We investigated whether optical surface monitoring systems (OSMS) could enable tattoo-less setup and substitute for 2-dimensional/3-dimensional or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based mid-imaging in NSB SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

OSMS was incorporated in parallel with an existing workflow using pretreatment CBCT and 2-dimensional/3-dimensional kV/kV mid-imaging beginning November 2019. The ability of OSMS to detect out-of-tolerance (>2 mm/>2°) and commanded couch shifts was analyzed. A workflow incorporating OSMS reference captures, CBCT for pretreatment verification, and OSMS/triggered imaging (TI) for intrafraction monitoring was developed for rib/sternum SBRT beginning November 2021 and all NSB SBRT beginning February 2022. Treatment time and CBCT-related radiation dose between the OSMS and the non-OSMS intrafraction monitoring group was analyzed pre- and post-OSMS/TI workflow adoption. All fractions were analyzed through statistical process control with use of an XmR chart of treatment time per quarter from February 2019 to February 2023. Special cause rules were based on Institute for Healthcare Improvement criteria.

RESULTS

From February 2019 to February 2023, 1993 NSB SBRT fractions were delivered, including 234 rib, 109 sternum, 214 ilium, and 682 multisite. Over 20 commanded shifts, OSMS could detect 2-mm shifts to within 0.4 mm 67% of the time and 0.8 mm 95% of the time. All NSB SBRT sites showed significant reductions in treatment time, including the greatest improvement in rib total treatment (21.6-13.4 minutes; P = 1.16 × 10-17) and beam time (7.9-3.2 minutes; P = 7.32 × 10-27). Significant reductions in CBCT-related radiation were also observed for several NSB sites. These process improvements were associated with OSMS adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of a novel NSB SBRT workflow incorporating OSMS/TI for bone intrafraction motion monitoring reduced treatment time and CBCT-related radiation exposure while also allowing for more continuous intrafraction motion monitoring for NSB SBRT. OSMS/TI enabled the transition to a tattoo-less workflow.

Widening the therapeutic window for central and ultra-central thoracic oligometastatic disease with stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART)

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Central/ultra-central thoracic tumors are challenging to treat with stereotactic radiotherapy due potential high-grade toxicity. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic window through motion control with breath-hold gating and real-time MR-imaging as well as the option for daily online adaptive replanning to account for changes in target and/or organ-at-risk (OAR) location.

MATERIALS/METHODS

26 central (19 ultra-central) thoracic oligoprogressive/oligometastatic tumors treated with isotoxic (OAR constraints-driven) 5-fraction SMART (median 50 Gy, range 35-60) between 10/2019-10/2022 were reviewed. Central tumor was defined as tumor within or touching 2 cm around proximal tracheobronchial tree (PBT) or adjacent to mediastinal/pericardial pleura. Ultra-central was defined as tumor abutting the PBT, esophagus, or great vessel. Hard OAR constraints observed were ≤ 0.03 cc for PBT V40, great vessel V52.5, and esophagus V35. Local failure was defined as tumor progression/recurrence within the planning target volume.

RESULTS

Tumor abutted the PBT in 31 %, esophagus in 31 %, great vessel in 65 %, and heart in 42 % of cases. 96 % of fractions were treated with reoptimized plan, necessary to meet OAR constraints (80 %) and/or target coverage (20 %). Median follow-up was 19 months (27 months among surviving patients). Local control (LC) was 96 % at 1-year and 90 % at 2-years (total 2/26 local failure). 23 % had G2 acute toxicities (esophagitis, dysphagia, anorexia, nausea) and one (4 %) had G3 acute radiation dermatitis. There were no G4-5 acute toxicities. There was no symptomatic pneumonitis and no G2 + late toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Isotoxic 5-fraction SMART resulted in high rates of LC and minimal toxicity. This approach may widen the therapeutic window for high-risk oligoprogressive/oligometastatic thoracic tumors.

Prospective Evaluation of Implementation of a Tattoo-less Workflow for Non-Spine Bone SBRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Oligometastatic disease has expanded the clinical indications for non-spine bone (NSB) SBRT. Optical surface monitoring systems (OSMS) may reduce treatment time if it represents an effective surrogate for bone intrafraction motion monitoring. We aimed to identify whether OSMS could substitute for 2D-3D mid-imaging and enable a tattoo-less set up in NSB SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Beginning 11/2019, OSMS was incorporated in parallel with an existing workflow using CBCT and mid 2D-3D kV/kV imaging for pre- and mid-imaging for NSB SBRT. The ability of OSMS to detect both observed out-of-tolerance (>2mm/>2deg) shifts and manual couch shifts was analyzed. A workflow incorporating OSMS reference captures, CBCT for pre-treatment verification and OSMS/triggered imaging (TI) for intrafraction monitoring was developed and deployed for rib/sternum SBRT beginning 11/2021 and all NSB SBRT beginning 2/2022. All NSB SBRT treatment appointments were analyzed through statistical process control (SPC) with use of an XmR chart of average set up and total treatment time per quarter from 2/2019 to 2/2023. Special cause rules were based on IHI rules and conduced with spreadsheet software.

RESULTS

From 2/2019 to 2/2023, 1962 NSB SBRT fractions were delivered, including 337 rib, 150 sternum, 197 femur, 266 ilium, 222 multi-site. Over 104 femur and 87 ilium images, there were no over tolerance intra-fraction events detected with 2D-3D or OSMS. Over 20 manual shifts, OSMS could detect 2mm shifts to within 0.4mm 67% of the time and 0.8mm 95% of time. There was no difference in treatment set up time following adoption of an OSMS/TI workflow as a replacement for 2D-3D mid-imaging. A reduction in rib SBRT delivery and multi-site treatment set-up times was significantly associated with the adoption of OSMS/TI and OSMS, respectively, as assessed based on special cause variation with 8 consecutive points below the mean.

CONCLUSION

Integration of OSMS and triggered imaging has enabled the transition to a completely tattoo-less workflow, thus sparing patients the need for permanent tattoos whilst also allowing more continuous motion monitoring and reduced radiation exposure related to unnecessary 2D-3D or CBCT mid-imaging. Treatment times were significantly reduced for patients receiving rib SBRT or multi-site NSB SBRT with this workflow.

A Prospective Study Assessing the Efficacy and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Bone Metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising treatment for oligometastatic disease in bone due to its delivery of high dose to target tissue and minimal dose to surrounding tissue. The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and toxicity of this treatment in patients with previously unirradiated oligometastatic bony disease.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this prospective phase II trial, patients with oligometastatic bone disease, defined as ≤3 active sites of disease, were treated with SBRT at one of two academic institutions between December 2016 and May 2019. Local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostatic specific antigen (PSA) progression, and overall survival (OS) were reported. Treatment-related toxicity was also reported.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients and 131 lesions arising from various tumor histologies were included in this study. The median age of patients enrolled in the study was 72.8 years (80.6% male, 19.4% female). Median follow-up was 26.7 months. The most common histology was prostate cancer (68.4%, 67/98). The most common dose prescriptions were 27/30 Gy in 3 fractions (26.0%, 34/131), 30 Gy in 5 fractions (19.1%, 25/131), or 30/35 Gy in 5 fractions (16.0%, 21/131). Multiple doses per treatment regimen reflect dose painting employing the lower dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and higher dose to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Four patients (4.1%, 4/98) experienced local progression at one site for each patient (3.1%, 4/131). Among patients who progressed locally, the median time to local recurrence was 25.8 months (31.0 months among prostate cancer patients, N = 2, and 14.5 months among non-prostate cancer patients, N = 2). Among the entire cohort, 2-year LPFS (including death without local progression) was 85.0%, 2-year PFS (including deaths as well as local, distant, and PSA-based progression) was 47.0%, and 2-year OS was 87.5%. Twenty-seven patients (27.6%, 27/98) developed treatment-related toxicities, and most were Grade 1 (19.4%, 19/98) and 2 (4.1%, 4/98). Four patients (4.1%, 4/98) developed Grade 3 toxicities; there were no Grade 4 toxicities. The most common toxicity was fatigue (10.2%, 10/98). Of 68 treated spine metastases, there were four (5.9%, 4/68) vertebral fractures. Among these four patients, median time to fracture was 23.5 months (range 14.2-39.2 months).

CONCLUSION

Our study supports existing literature in showing that SBRT is effective and tolerable in patients with oligometastatic bone disease. Larger phase III trials are necessary and reasonable to determine long-term efficacy and toxicities.

Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Femur Oligometastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for oligometastatic bone disease, but there is limited data regarding the clinical outcomes of utilizing SBRT in treatment for femur metastases, which was excluded from SABR-COMET. We aimed to identify patient or treatment factors associated with clinical outcomes among patients treated with SBRT to femur metastases for oligometastatic disease control or re-irradiation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified 50 patients with 56 femur lesions consecutively treated with SBRT at a single institution May 2017-June 2022. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to characterize time-to-event endpoints and Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate the associations between baseline factors and clinical outcomes. Local control was defined as the absence of regional tumor progression at treated area or need for surgical fixation post radiation.

RESULTS

Most patients had ECOG 0-1 (90%), prostate (50%) or breast/lung (16%) cancer, and 1-3 lesions (100%), including 30 proximal and 5 distal. 55% of lesions received concurrent systemic therapy, including ADT (n = 18) or immunotherapy (n = 6). Median PTV volume was 54.7cc (range, 6.6 to 387cc). PTV V100(%) was 99% (range 71.5-100). Fractionation included 18-20 Gy/1F, 27-30 Gy/3F, 25-40 Gy/5F, and 50 Gy/10F. 43% of lesions had Mirel's score ≥ 7 and 91% of lesions did not have extraosseous bone extension on diagnostic CT and/or MRI. Acute toxicities included grade 1 fatigue (14.3%), pain flare (7.1%), and decreased blood counts (1.8%). Late toxicities included fracture (1.8%) at 1.5 years and 2 patients with radiation-induced osteonecrosis (3.6%) from dose of 40 Gy in 5F and 30 Gy in 5F (after prior 30 Gy/10F). One patient (n = 2%) required fixation post-radiation due to progression of disease or symptoms. With median follow up 19.4 months, 1 and 2-year rates of local control were 84% and 69%, progression-free survival were 55% and 27%, and overall survival were 91% and 74%.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant association between patient or treatment characteristics and local control outcomes. Femur SBRT for oligometastatic disease control in well-selected patients was associated with good outcomes with minimal rates of acute and late toxicity. Further prospective study is warranted.

Multi-Institutional Analysis of Metastasis Directed Therapy with or without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Several prospective trials in oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) have shown metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) can delay time to progression and initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to observation. However, the optimal integration of ADT with MDT remains unclear. Here we report a multi-national, multi-institutional retrospective cohort of omCSPC treated with MDT to characterize the long-term outcomes of patients treated with MDT alone or in combination with ADT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with a controlled primary site and omCSPC (defined as ≤ 5 lesions on conventional imaging) treated with MDT with or without concurrent ADT and with at least 36 months follow-up were retrospectively screened across 13 institutions. The primary endpoints included biochemical progression free survival (bPFS) and radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and stratified by treatment group (MDT alone vs MDT + ADT). Multivariable Cox regression was performed adjusted for variables found to be prognostic on univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 414 patients screened, a total of 263 patients treated between 2003 and 2018 met inclusion criteria and included. Of these, 105 received MDT alone and 158 received MDT+ADT, with median follow-up of 49.5 and 54.5 months, respectively. The majority were metachronous (90%) and had bone lesions (60%). Median ADT duration was 21.3 months (IQR 12.0- 31.9). Patients who received ADT vs. no ADT had poorer prognostic features including 23% vs. 1% synchronous (p<0.001), and 55% vs 40% Gleason 8-10 (p = 0.012). ADT use was associated with a better 5-year bPFS 24% vs 11% (p<0.0001) and rPFS 41% vs 29% (p<0.001). On multivariable Cox regression adjusting for post-MDT PSA nadir and salvage therapy, ADT use maintained significance for both bPFS (HR 0.51 (0.36, 0.71), p<0.001) and rPFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes with MDT alone suggest a small proportion of patients experience sustained disease control. The addition of ADT appears to improve rPFS, however prospective studies are needed in order to allow for personalization of care in patients with omCSPC.

Clinical Outcomes with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Registry Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Metastasis-directed radiation therapy using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer (Oligo PCa) has a demonstrated benefit for local control and biochemical recurrence free survival for men with oligorecurrent PCa; however, the impact of SBRT within other oligometastatic states and in the context of systemic therapy remains poorly characterized. In this study, we investigate prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort of Oligo PCa patients treated with metastasis-directed SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Using a single-institution registry trial, we analyzed a prospective cohort of 86 patients with Oligo PCa (≤5 metastatic lesions) and treated with metastasis-directed SBRT between 2017- 2022. Patients were classified as synchronous, metachronous, or induced oligometastatic disease as per the ESTRO guidelines. We evaluated the time to radiographic progression (TTRP), defined as the time from SBRT start date to radiographic progression, as well as time to initiation of new treatment (TTNT), defined as the time from SBRT end date to initiation of new therapy (systemic or radiation therapy). Time to event (TTE) was defined as the time from SBRT start date to radiographic progression or initiation of new therapy, whichever occurred first. Patients without documented events were censored at the date of last disease assessment. Comparative analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods.

RESULTS

Eighty-six men with Oligo PCa treated with SBRT were followed for a median of 16.4 months with M0 (73%), Oligo PCa (21%) or polymetastatic PCa (6%) GS > = 8 (63%) at initial diagnosis. At the time of treatment with initial SBRT, 21% had synchronous oligometastatic disease, 63% had metachronous or repeat oligorecurrence or oligoprogression, and 16% had induced oligometastatic disease. Most patients were treated to 1-3 sites (94%), which predominantly included bone (86%), and the median dose was 35 Gy/5F. Concurrent systemic therapy during SBRT was seen in 85% of patients, including (60.5% with new generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors). Overall survival at 1-year and 2-years was 96.9% [95% CI, 88.2-99.2%] and 94.4% [95% CI, 83.2-98.2%]. Using univariable analysis, those who did not receive systemic treatment during SBRT had significantly shorter TTRP (HR 3.67, [95% CI, 1.62-8.32], p = 0.002), TTNT (HR 3.24, 95% CI [1.49-7.06], p = 0.003), and TTE (HR 3.05, [95% CI, 1.44-6.45], p = 0.004). Additionally, patients treated with SBRT for metachronous (HR 2.89, [95% CI 0.68-12.30]) and induced metastatic disease (HR 8.96, [95% CI 1.85-43.37]) had significantly shorter TTE compared to synchronous oligometastatic disease (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Using a prospective registry cohort of men with Oligo PCa treated with SBRT, we identify an association of oligometastatic state and the use of concurrent systemic therapy with improved TTRP and TTNT. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Deep Learning-Based Automated Quality Assurance for Palliative Spinal Treatment Planning in Radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Robustquality assurance (QA) for palliative spine radiation therapy (RT) remains critical due to the risk of wrong anatomic level treatment on account of human error in enumerating vertebral bodies accurately based on morphology with incomplete imaging of the spine and prevalence of anatomic variants (10%). We propose a rapid, fully automated deep learning-based QA (DL-QA) tool for segmenting and enumerating vertebral structures from image data, capable of identifying misalignment based on discrepancies in calculated dose coverage.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Ina retrospective cohort of 514 patients who received palliative spine radiation treatment at a single institution for spinal metastases, vertebral volumes for each individual spine level were automatically segmented on RT planning computed tomography scans using a publicly available deep learning algorithm, Total Segmentator (TS) deployed in the treatment planning system (Wasserthal et al, 2022). Departmental policy requires that the prescription/plan name include all spinal levels that receive a prescribed dosimetric threshold of V50% > 50%. By comparing the intended spine level target in the prescription and plan name against the TS volumes, the DL-QA flagged all cases for which any target vertebrae did not receive this threshold dose and/or any non-targeted vertebrae that received V50% > 50%. To detect spine anomalies, cases were also flagged if any vertebrae volume was not within ±1σ of the entire population of vertebrae volumes. Flagged cases were either categorized as: (1) wrong spine level RT error; (2) documentation error, in which treatment was correct but the prescription/plan name did not follow Departmental policy; or (3) potential spinal geometric error. All flagged cases were verified manually by checking the original images and treatment planning data.

RESULTS

Outof 514 patients, 29 cases were flagged as potential errors. Manual review revealed that one of these was a previously discovered true treatment error (due to anatomic variant with 4 lumbar bodies) while 10 were treated as intended but showed documentation errors due to variants in the number of vertebral bodies, kyphosis of the spine causing non-targeted vertebrae to appear in the treatment field, or improper observation of the Departmental plan naming policy. The remaining 18 cases were associated with flagged vertebrae volumes. Reviewing those patients, we identified spinal anomalies where TS attempted to account for extra or missing vertebrae (N = 9) and cases where TS made segmentation errors (N = 9).

CONCLUSION

Theproposed automated DL-QA system successfully identified patients with spine anomalies, flagged documentation errors, verified the correct target levels of spine RT treatments, and detected a known misadministration. The next phase will involve prospective testing of the system in a clinical setting upstream of treatment delivery.

Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Spinal cord delineation is critical to the delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although underestimating the spinal cord can lead to irreversible myelopathy, overestimating the spinal cord may compromise the planning target volume coverage. We compare spinal cord contours based on computed tomography (CT) simulation with a myelogram to spinal cord contours based on fused axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods and Materials

Eight patients with 9 spinal metastases treated with spinal SBRT were contoured by 8 radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and physicists, with spinal cord definition based on (1) fused axial T2 MRI and (2) CT-myelogram simulation images, yielding 72 sets of spinal cord contours. The spinal cord volume was contoured at the target vertebral body volume based on both images. The mixed-effect model assessed comparisons of T2 MRI- to myelogram-defined spinal cord in centroid deviations (deviations in the center point of the cord) through the vertebral body target volume, spinal cord volumes, and maximum doses (0.035 cc point) to the spinal cord applying the patient's SBRT treatment plan, in addition to in-between and within-subject variabilities.

Results

The estimate for the fixed effect from the mixed model showed that the mean difference between 72 CT volumes and 72 MRI volumes was 0.06 cc and was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, -0.034, 0.153; P = .1832). The mixed model showed that the mean dose at 0.035 cc for CT-defined spinal cord contours was 1.24 Gy lower than that of MRI-defined spinal cord contours and was statistically significant (95% confidence interval, -2.292, -0.180; P = .0271). Also, the mixed model indicated no statistical significance for deviations in any of the axes between MRI-defined spinal cord contours and CT-defined spinal cord contours.

Conclusions

CT myelogram may not be required when MRI imaging is feasible, although uncertainty at the cord-to-treatment volume interface may result in overcontouring and hence higher estimated cord dose-maximums with axial T2 MRI-based cord definition.

Comparison of MR-soft tissue based versus biliary stent based alignment for image guidance in pancreatic SBRT

PURPOSE

The role of biliary stents in image-guided localization for pancreatic cancer has been inconclusive. To date, stent accuracy has been largely evaluated against implanted fiducials on cone beam computed tomography. We aim to use magnetic resonance (MR) soft tissue as a direct reference to examine the geometric and dosimetric impacts of stent-based localization on the newly available MR linear accelerator.

METHODS

Thirty pancreatic cancer patients (132 fractions) treated on our MR linear accelerator were identified to have a biliary stent. In our standard adaptive workflow, patients were set up to the target using soft tissue for image registration and structures were re-contoured on daily MR images. The original plan was then projected on treatment anatomy and dose predicted, followed by plan re-optimization and treatment delivery. These online predicted plans were soft tissue-based and served as reference plans. Retrospective image registration to the stent was performed offline to simulate stent-based localization and the magnitude of shifts was taken as the geometric accuracy of stent localization. New predicted plans were generated based on stent-alignment for dosimetric comparison.

RESULTS

Shifts were within 3 mm for 90% of the cases (mean = 1.5 mm); however, larger shifts up to 7.2 mm were observed. Average PTV coverage dropped by 1.1% with a maximum drop of 26.8%. The mean increase in V35Gy was 0.15, 0.05, 0.02, and 0.02 cc for duodenum, stomach, small bowel and large bowel, respectively. Stent alignment was significantly worse for all metrics except for small bowel (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall discrepancy between stent- and soft tissue-alignment was modest; however, large discrepancies were observed for select cases. While PTV coverage loss may be compensated for by using a larger margin, the increase in dose to gastrointestinal organs at risk may limit the role of biliary stents in image-guided localization.

Outcomes with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and fixed-duration systemic therapy in oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC)

178

Background: Intensification of systemic therapy beyond ADT, with use of novel hormonal agents (NHAs), and radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate have a proven survival benefit in mHSPC. MDT has shown benefit in delaying need for ADT in omHSPC in phase 2 trials. Combination of fixed-duration systemic therapy with MDT (and RT to the prostate in de novo mHSPC) may produce long-term remission and treatment-free survival in selected patients with omHSPC. Methods: Patients with de novo or recurrent omHSPC treated at our institution between 2010-2020 with MDT (+/- prostate RT if de novo) and a fixed duration of systemic therapy completed by September 2022 were identified. There was no limit on number of metastases as long as all sites could be treated with MDT in the view of the treating physician. Oligometastases were defined as bone or soft tissue lesions beyond the pelvic lymph nodes identified on conventional scans (CT, bone scan, MRI) or PET (fluciclovine or PSMA). The primary outcome was freedom from biochemical recurrence (BCR), defined as PSA of >0.02 (if the patient had undergone prior radical prostatectomy) or >2+nadir (if the patient underwent RT) after completion of systemic therapy. Testosterone recovery was defined as serum testosterone >150ng/dL attained after completion of systemic therapy. BCR-free survival after completion of systemic therapy was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: 32 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis of mHSPC was 67 (range 52-78). 12 patients (38%) had de novo mHSPC while 20 (63%) had oligorecurrent HSPC. Detection of omHSPC was by conventional scans in 23 patients (72%) and by PET only in 9 (28%), and median number of oligometastases was 1 (range 1-6). Median PSA at start of therapy for omHSPC was 8.2ng/mL (range 0.4-1244), with systemic therapy most commonly comprising of ADT and a NHA (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, n=26 [82%]); 6 patients (19%) had ADT alone. Median duration of systemic therapy was 24 months (range 6-36), with 3 men (9%) having received prior systemic therapy for mHSPC. MDT consisted of external beam RT (EBRT, n=10, 31%), EBRT + stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT, n=8, 25%), or SBRT alone (n=14, 44%). At a median follow-up of 44 months (range 24-127) and 20 months (2-103) after start and completion of systemic therapy respectively, 9 patients (28%) had BCR and 23 (72%) remained free of BCR, of whom 13 (57%) had testosterone recovery. The estimated 2-year BCR-free survival after completion of systemic therapy was 73% (95% CI 51-86). Conclusions: In this carefully selected cohort of men with omHSPC, estimated 2-yr BCR-free survival after completion of therapy was >70% with ~2 years of ADT +/- NHA along with MDT +/- prostate RT (if de novo). Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether this translates to a durable treatment-free remission, and possibly cure, in these patients with omHSPC.

Review of Prospective Trials Assessing the Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastasis-directed Treatment in Oligometastatic Genitourinary Cancers

CONTEXT

Emerging evidence supports the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as metastatic-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers; however, the prospective data to guide its application as an alternative standard of care remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To review prospective trials that assess the role of SBRT for patients with genitourinary cancers within a modern framework of oligometastatic disease (OMD) and to highlight clinical scenarios where SBRT may offer a benefit to patients with metastatic cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a critical review of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov in April 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, combined with expert input to identify prospective studies investigating the role of SBRT for oligometastatic prostate, renal, or bladder cancer.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The most commonly studied application of SBRT has been for metachronous oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Further prospective study is needed to define the role of SBRT in delaying time to next therapy or inducing synergy with other systemic therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT has been associated with high rates of local control and minimal risk of toxicity with multiple trials assessing an MDT-alone approach for oligorecurrent HSPC. From a tumor-agnostic perspective, the clinical benefit of SBRT for OMD has been associated with the ability to extend overall survival. As methods of cancer detection and treatment evolve, expansion of studies that prospectively evaluate SBRT MDT, stratifying by tumor histology and oligometastatic state, is needed to inform optimal patient selection and treatment strategy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We review outcomes from prospective trials assessing the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers, which have predominantly investigated SBRT for oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Much work remains to define how SBRT alone compares with other standard of care treatments for prostate cancer or the role of SBRT in tumor control or delaying time to next therapy in oligometastatic renal and bladder cancer.

Longitudinal symptoms and temporal trends in palliative care, palliative radiotherapy, and anti-cancer treatment near end of life among patients with metastatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Early specialty palliative care (PC) integration improves oncologic outcomes. We aimed to examine longitudinal relationships between specialty PC and palliative radiotherapy (RT), temporal distribution of symptoms, and predictors of earlier specialty PC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 135 patients with metastatic cancer who received palliative RT at our institution (7/2017-2/2018) and who had died by final study follow-up (6/2021). Descriptive statistics summarized frequencies of clinical visits and symptoms over relative survival time (quartiles 1-3: first 75% of life remaining from metastatic diagnosis to death versus quartile 4: last 25% of life remaining from metastatic diagnosis to death). Logistic regression analyses revealed predictors of receiving earlier (quartiles 1-3) versus later (quartile 4) specialty PC.

RESULTS

There were 16.3%, 10.4%, 26.7%, and 46.7% of palliative RT consultations, compared to 4.7%, 7.6%, 14.0%, and 73.7% of specialty PC visits, that occurred in quartiles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. On multivariable analysis, pain significantly predicted for receiving earlier specialty PC [odds ratios (OR) =15.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.16-324.23; P=0.020], while patients with ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens were less likely to have received earlier specialty PC (OR =0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.58; P=0.009). The most common reasons for first specialty PC visit were addressing pain (61.0%) and goals of care (19.5%). Overall, 73.3% (99/135) of patients were referred to hospice and 9.6% (13/135) received either palliative RT, chemotherapy, or surgery within 30 days of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 47% of palliative RT visits compared with 74% of specialty PC visits occurred in the last quarter of life from metastatic diagnosis to death. Multidisciplinary efforts are needed to manage longitudinal symptoms and offer goal-concordant care.

Patient and Treatment Factors Associated with Improved Local Control and Survival in Oligometastatic Bone Disease: Results from a Large Single-Institution Experience Using Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Limited data exists to guide optimal patient selection and treatment of bone metastases with curative intent despite the increasing application of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic (OM) disease control and re-irradiation(ReRT).

METHODS

Clinical characteristics for 434 patients consecutively treated with bone SBRT at a single institution from 3/2011-6/2020 were analyzed by OM, spine, and non-spine bone using Cox regression to determine association with local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Most patients had prostate (39%) or breast/lung (21%) cancer and 1-3 lesions (96%), with 651 lesions (spine 63%) treated for ReRT (12%) or OMD (88%), including synchronous (10%), metachronous (28%), repeat (27%), or induced (23%) states as defined by ESTRO/EORTC criteria. Biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) ≥50 (HR 0.68, CI 0.48-0.96, p<0.03) predicted improved LC among OM lesions and planning target volume (PTV)≥150 cc (HR 1.94, CI 1.02 to 3.70, p<0.04) predicted worse LC for non-spine bone. Prostate histology, performance status (PS) 0-1, and MFI ≥2 year predicted improved PFS and OS (p<0.05). Metachronous, synchronous, or repeat OM had higher PFS and OS (p≤0.001) than induced OM. With median follow-up 25.7 months, 1 and 2-year PFS was 63% and 47% for OM and 36% and 25% for ReRT;1 and 2-yr OS was 87% and 73% for OM, 58% and 43% for ReRT. Acute toxicities included grade 1-2 pain flare (9%) and fatigue (14%). Late toxicities included fracture (1%) for OM and myelopathy (2.5%) or nerve pain (1.2%) for ReRT.

CONCLUSIONS

BED₁₀ ≥ 50 for OM and PTV<150cc for non-spine bone lesions was associated with improved LC. Prostate histology, PS 0-1, MFI≥2 years, and metachronous, synchronous, or repeat presentations per EORTC/ESTRO OM criteria predicted improved PFS and OS among OM patients treated with bone SBRT.

MR-guided prostate SBRT with daily online plan adaptation: Results of a prospective phase I trial and supplemental cohort

Purpose

Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)–guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for prostate cancer allows for MR-based contouring, real-time MR motion management, and daily plan adaptation. The clinical and dosimetric benefits associated with prostate SMART remain largely unknown.

Methods and Materials

A phase 1 trial of prostate SMART was conducted with primary endpoints of safety and feasibility. An additional cohort of patients similarly treated with prostate SMART were included in the analysis. SMART was delivered to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate ± seminal vesicles using the MRIdian linear accelerator system (ViewRay, Inc). Rates of urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed. Dosimetric analyses were conducted to evaluate the specific benefits of daily plan adaptation.

Results

The cohort included 22 patients (n = 10 phase 1, n = 12 supplemental) treated in 110 fractions. Median follow-up was 7.9 months. Acute grade 2 urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects were observed in 22.7% and 4.5%, respectively, and 4.5% and 0%, respectively, at last follow-up. No grade 3+ events were observed. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 urinary obstructive scores decreased during SMART (mean, 9.3 points; P = .03) and returned to baseline by 3 months. No other significant changes in patient-reported outcome measures were observed. One-hundred percent of fractions required plan adaptation owing to exceeding organ-at-risk metrics (68%) or suboptimal target coverage (33%) resulting from anatomic changes. Minimum acceptable planning target volume, rectal, bladder, and urethra/bladder neck metrics were violated in 24%, 20%, 24%, and 33% of predicted plans, respectively; 0% of reoptimized plans violated metrics. Underlying causes for deficient dosimetry before reoptimization included changes in bladder filling, seminal vesicle position, prostate volume (median 4.7% increase by fraction 3; range, 0%-56%), and hotspots shifting into urethra/bladder neck.

Conclusions

Prostate SMART results in low risk of acute toxic effects with improvements in target and organ-at-risk dosimetry. The clinical benefits resulting from daily plan adaptation, including urethra/bladder neck protection, warrant further investigation.

Patterns of Specialty Palliative Care Utilization Among Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy

CONTEXT

Palliative radiation therapy (RT) is frequently used to ameliorate cancer-associated symptoms and improve quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To examine how palliative care (PC) as a specialty is integrated at the time of RT consultation for patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 162 patients with metastatic cancer who received palliative RT at our institution (7/2017-2/2018). Fisher's exact test identified differences in incidence of receiving any specialty PC. Logistic regression analyses determined predictors of receiving PC.

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients (46%) who received any specialty PC, 24 (32%) initiated PC within four weeks of RT consultation. The most common reasons for specialty PC initiation were pain (64%) and goals of care/end-of-life care management (23%). Referrals to specialty PC were made by inpatient care teams (48.6%), medical oncologists (48.6%), radiation oncologists (1.4%), and self-referring patients (1.4%). Patients with pain at RT consultation had a higher incidence of receiving specialty PC (58.7% vs. 37.4%, P = 0.0097). There was a trend toward decreased PC among patients presenting with neurological symptoms (34.8% vs. 50%, P = 0.084). On multivariable analysis, receiving specialty PC significantly differed by race (non-white vs. white, odds ratio [OR] = 6.295 [95% CI 1.951-20.313], P = 0.002), cancer type (lung vs. other histology, OR = 0.174 [95% CI 0.071-0.426], P = 0.0006), and RT consultation setting (inpatient vs. outpatient, OR = 3.453 [95% CI 1.427-8.361], P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Fewer than half of patients receiving palliative RT utilized specialty PC. Initiatives are needed to increase PC, especially for patients with lung cancer and neurological symptoms, and to empower radiation oncologists to refer patients to specialty PC.

Evaluating the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy with respect to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors for metastatic prostate cancer

121

Background: Outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with respect to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) have not been characterized for metastatic prostate cancer. Our purpose is to characterize prostate specific antigen (PSA) response and progression free survival (PFS) following SBRT among men who have received ARSI in castration sensitive and resistant settings. Methods: A single institution retrospective analysis was performed for men treated with SBRT and ARSI and categorized into 4 groups: 1) oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC), 2) ARSI-sensitive (ARSI-s) oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (omCRPC), 3) ARSI-resistant (ARSI-r) omCRPC, and 4) polymetastatic CRPC (pmCRPC). We calculated the PSA reduction greater than 50% (PSA50) and median PFS (PSA or radiographic progression) as determined by routine care. We also used Cox regression analysis to determine factors influencing PFS for ARSI-r disease. Results: 73 men with 126 lesions were treated with SBRT and followed for a median of 14.4 months. The percentages of men who achieved a PSA50 for omCSPC, ARSI-s omCRPC, ARSI-r omCRPC and pmCRPC were 100%, 90%, 62.9%, and 16.7%, respectively. Respective median PFS values were: not reached, 17.3, 9.0, and 1.6 months. For the 35 men with ARSI-r omCRPC, incomplete ablation (defined as the presence of untreated lesions after SBRT or prior palliative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT)) (HR 3.51 [1.36, 9.06]; p = 0.01) was associated with worse PFS on multivariable analysis. For the subgroup of 22 men with ARSI-r omCRPC without prior palliative EBRT or untreated metastases, the median PFS was 13.1 months. Conclusions: SBRT may augment the efficacy of ARSI, particularly among men with ARSI-r omCRPC, provided that all lesions received ablative radiation doses. Future prospective study of SBRT for men receiving ARSI is warranted.

Characteristics and Predictors of Radiographic Local Failure in Patients With Spinal Metastases Treated With Palliative Conventional Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Although local control is an important issue for longer-term survivors of spinal metastases treated with conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), the literature on radiographic local failure (LF) in these patients is sparse. To inform clinical decision-making, we evaluated rates, consequences, and predictors of radiographic LF in patients with spinal metastases managed with palliative conventional EBRT alone.

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively reviewed 296 patients with spinal metastases who received palliative EBRT at a single institution (2006-2013). Radiographic LF was defined as radiologic progression within the treatment field, with death considered a competing risk. Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence, and Cox regression analyses determined overall survival estimates, LF rates, and predictors of LF, respectively.

Results

There were 182 patients with follow-up computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging; median overall survival for these patients was 7.7 months. Patients received a median of 30 Gy in 10 fractions to a median of 4 vertebral bodies. Overall, 74 of 182 patients (40.7%) experienced LF. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month LF rates were 26.5%, 33.1%, and 36.5%, respectively, while corresponding rates of death were 24.3%, 38.1%, and 45.9%. Median time to LF was 3.8 months. Of those with LF, 51.4% had new compression fractures, 39.2% were admitted for pain control, and 35.1% received reirradiation; median time from radiation therapy (RT) to each of these events was 3.0, 5.7, and 9.2 months, respectively. Independent predictors of LF included single-fraction RT (8 Gy) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.592; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.437-4.675; P = .002), lung histology (HR, 3.568; 95% CI, 1.532-8.309; P = .003), and kidney histology (HR, 4.937; 95% CI, 1.529-15.935; P = .008).

Conclusions

Patients experienced a >30% rate of radiographic LF by 1 year after EBRT. Single-fraction RT and lung or kidney histology predicted LF. Given the high rates of LF for patients with favorable prognosis, assessing the risk of death versus LF is important for clinical decision-making.

Characteristics of Patients and Treatment Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Spinal Tumor Program

Objective: We describe characteristics of patient and treatment recommendations from a spinal tumor board at one institution, including representation from palliative care.

Background: The impact of prospective multidisciplinary input for patients with spinal tumors is poorly understood despite their increasing complexity.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 622 cases sequentially discussed at a weekly spinal tumor board, and abstracted patient and treatment information from the medical record and meeting minutes.

Results: From April 2017 to February 2019, 622 cases representing 438 unique patients were discussed. The median age was 62 years (range 21–92). Most patients had spinal tumors originating from metastases (91.78%), including breast (14.3%), nonsmall cell lung cancer (13.4%), prostate (10.9%), and renal cell cancer (8.8%), and the remainder had primary central nervous system (4.3%) or benign tumors (3.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients were alive at last follow-up. Conventional external beam radiotherapy was the most common treatment recommendation (33.8%) followed by surgery (26.2%), stereotactic body radiation therapy (17.8%), imaging follow-up (16.6%), and vertebroplasty (15.9%). Palliative care was the primary treatment recommended for 4.5%, and no therapy recommended for 4.0%. Treatment recommendation involved two modalities for 29% of cases, and three in 1.3% of cases. In four cases, biopsy to confirm pathology changed management due to unexpected findings of osteomyelitis, hematopoiesis, or new diagnosis of plasmacytoma.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary input is integral to the optimal care of spinal tumor patients. The high risk of death highlights the need to prioritize modalities that optimize quality of life in the context of a patient's individual prognosis.

Patterns of palliative care among patients receiving palliative radiotherapy

55

Background: Few studies have examined how palliative care (PC) delivered by a dedicated PC team is integrated at the time of radiotherapy (RT) consultation. We aimed to characterize patterns of PC in relation to RT, predictors of PC, and outcomes based on PC integration. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 162 patients with metastatic cancer who received palliative RT at a single institution (7/2017-2/2018). PC integration was defined as: no PC, concurrent PC (PC initiated +/- 4 weeks within RT consult), established PC (any PC visit in the 6 months prior to RT consult), and subsequent PC (PC initiated > 4 weeks after RT consult). Logistic regression analyses determined predictors of receiving any PC. Cox proportional hazards regression identified predictors of OS. Results: Median follow-up was 7.8 months (range: 0.3-20.6). Patients (56% female; 84% white; median age: 64 years (range: 22-94)) had a median of 2 metastatic sites (range: 1-6) and 2 prior courses of palliative chemotherapy (range: 0-7). Of the 74 patients (46%) with any PC, 24 (32%) had concurrent PC, 21 (28%) had established PC, and 29 (39%) had subsequent PC. The most common reasons for PC initiation were pain (58%) and goals of care/end-of-life care management (20%). Nearly half (49%) of PC consults occurred in an inpatient setting; a minority (22%) of RT consults were inpatient. On multivariate analysis, receiving any PC significantly differed by race (non-white vs white, OR = 6.40 [95% CI 1.98-20.69], p = 0.002), cancer type (lung vs non-breast other histology, OR = 0.15 [95% CI 0.06-0.35], p < 0.001), and RT consult setting (inpatient vs outpatient, OR = 3.32 [95% CI 1.36-8.13], p = 0.009). On multivariate analysis, male sex (HR = 1.51 [95% CI 1.01-2.27], p = 0.046) and ECOG 2-4 (HR = 2.22 [95% CI 1.47-3.36], p < 0.001) predicted worse OS. Age, marital status, language, insurance type, metastatic burden, prior palliative chemotherapy, and PC integration were not independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: At our institution, dedicated PC occurred in < 50% of patients receiving palliative RT for metastatic cancer. We need initiatives to increase PC for all palliative RT patients, especially in the outpatient setting and for those with lung cancer who were less likely to receive dedicated PC.

Translational and basic science opportunities in palliative care and radiation oncology

Radiation therapy is commonly used in the metastatic setting to palliate pain, neurological deficits, bleeding and other complications of metastatic disease, allowing patients to live longer and have better quality of life. Despite the effective use of radiation and other palliative treatment modalities, many patients continue to experience poorly controlled pain and other serious sequelae of their disease, underscoring the need for additional research in this area. In this review we highlight recent developments impacting the fields of palliative care and radiation oncology and describe opportunities for research and innovation including studies of tumor microenvironment, identification of effective biomarkers of tumor response and combinatorial treatments with new systemic agents. It is our hope that progress in these fields will improve the lives of patients living with advanced malignancies.

Palliative Radiation Therapy for Vertebral Metastases and Metastatic Cord Compression in Patients Treated With Anti-PD-1 Therapy

Background: There is increasing use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) across multiple cancer types, including in patients at risk for vertebral metastases and cord compression. These patients are often treated with palliative radiotherapy (PRT); however, data evaluating the combination of PRT and ICB in patients with vertebral metastases is limited. Furthermore, patients with cord compression are generally excluded from prospective clinical trials. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated outcomes following PRT and PD-1 inhibition in patients with vertebral metastases. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 37 consecutive patients (total 57 lesions) treated with radiation for vertebral metastases who also received PD-1 inhibition. Patient, treatment and outcomes data were abstracted from the medical records. Results: Histologies included non-small cell lung cancer (n = 21), renal cell carcinoma (n = 9) and melanoma (n = 7). Out of 57 lesions,18 involved >1 segments of the vertebral column. There were isolated lesions in thoracic (16), lumbar (9), cervical (6), and sacral (8) vertebrae. Presenting symptoms included pain (19), numbness (10), and weakness (3). Eleven patients were asymptomatic. Radiologic cord compression was present in 12, epidural extension in 28 and compression fracture in 14. Eleven patients underwent surgical decompression prior to the onset of RT. Median radiation dose was 24 Gy (range 8-30 Gy). Stereotactic radiation was delivered in 4 patients; 33 patients received conformal RT. 21 patients received PD-1 inhibition after RT, 9 before RT and 7 with RT. Seven patients received concurrent CTLA-4 inhibitors with anti-PD-1 therapy. Treatment was in general well-tolerated. Toxicities included fatigue (6), transient pain flare (1), nausea/vomiting (1) and G1 skin changes (1). All patients reported some degree of pain relief. Numbness/weakness was improved in 6 of 13 patients with baseline symptoms (46%) and this was more likely in patients that received vertebral radiation after starting PD-1 inhibitors (71 vs. 17%, p = 0.04). Most patients (22 of 33 evaluable patients, 67%) had stability of irradiated lesions on subsequent follow up imaging performed at median of 30 days from RT, whereas 3 had a complete local response and 4 had a partial local response. Conclusions: We demonstrate that PRT administered to vertebral metastases was well-tolerated and effective in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. There was an encouraging rate of pain reduction and neurological improvement.

Analysis of psychosocial and spiritual concerns in patients consulted for palliative radiation therapy

157

Background: Little is known about the prevalence of psychosocial and spiritual issues in patients being treated with palliative radiation therapy (PRT). This study assessed patients’ psychosocial and spiritual needs as interpreted by radiation oncologists at PRT consultation. Methods: This prospective, survey-based study assessed consecutive consults for PRT from May 19, 2014 to September 26, 2014 at 3 Boston-area community and academic hospitals. Consulting clinicians completed a survey to identify the presence of psychosocial and spiritual issues. 162 consecutive consults were surveyed with 139 psychosocial and spiritual assessments received (86% response rate). Psychosocial and spiritual domains include anxiety, depression, family conflict, family coping issues, personal worries, and spiritual need. Providers ranked the relevance (5-point Likert scale, not at all to extremely) of several palliative care issues, including psychosocial and spiritual issues. Results: Providers reported psychosocial or spiritual problems in 71.4% (n = 100) of consults. Psychosocial concerns were relevant in 68% of consults and spiritual concerns were relevant in 28%. The most frequent problems were anxiety (33.6%, n = 47) and personal issues (33.6%, n = 47), including financial worries. Univariate analysis showed association between psychosocial and spiritual concerns (p = 0.005). Providers treating patients less than 30 days from metastatic diagnosis more commonly reported spiritual concern (p = 0.020). Advanced care planning needs were also predictive of spiritual concerns (p = 0.026). At initial consult, 53% (n = 73) of providers ranked psychosocial problems as “Extremely” or “Very Important” to patient care. 10% of providers ranked spiritual problems as “Extremely” or “Very Important.” Conclusions: Providers noted relevance of psychosocial and spiritual issues to patient care. Given the prevalence of psychosocial and spiritual concerns in this population, it will be important for palliative providers to assess their patients routinely. The variability of predictors demonstrates the appropriateness of assessing all patients consulted for PRT for psychosocial and spiritual concerns.

Characteristics of urgent palliative cancer care consultations encountered by radiation oncologists

135

Background: Palliative radiation therapy(PRT)is often employed in patients with advanced cancers requiring urgent consultation given the rapidity of presentation.We report on characteristics of urgent palliative oncologic issues encountered by radiation oncologists(RO). Methods: We prospectively evaluated patterns of presentation in162 consecutive consultations for urgent PRT at 3 centers from 5/19/14 to 9/26/14.Survey of palliative care issues was completed by physicians/nurse practitioners including assessment of reasons for urgent radiation oncology consultation,disease presentation characteristics and site of RT delivery.Response rate was 86% with 140 of 162 responses received. Results: Median age of patients was 63 years(29-89)with 39% > 65, 41% from 50-65 and 20% < 50 years;56% were males and 44% females. Most were married(62%)and 30% non-Caucasians.48% had ECOG PS 0-1,whereas it was 2, 3 and 4 in 24%,9% and 3%.Primary cancer diagnoses were lung (28%),breast(13%),prostate(10%),melanoma(10%),sarcoma(7%) and other diagnoses in 32%.Pain was predominant reason for consult(57%)followed by brain metastases(29%),spinal cord/cauda compression (13%),dyspnea (10%),bleeding (8%),bone fracture(4%)and dysphagia(2%).Clinicians managed pain (69%),neurologic symptoms(51%),fatigue (49%),intestinal(21%),respiratory (19%) symptoms,bleeding (14%),insomnia (13%),nausea/vomiting(12%)and dysphagia(6%).Patients presented at all stages 79% at the time of their diagnosis of metastatic cancer,63% with an established ( > 1 month) metastatic cancer diagnosis and continuing to further cancer therapies and 17% proceeding to hospice care without further anti-cancer therapy after PRT. Conclusions: Radiation oncologists care for patients across time course of metastatic cancer diagnosis managing variety of urgent oncologic issues,most commonly metastases causing pain followed by brain metastases and cord compression.They also manage cancer-related symptoms,mostly pain,neurological symptoms and fatigue.These findings point to need for palliative care to be well integrated into radiation oncology practice including education and systems of care.

Influence of Comorbidity on the Risk of Mortality in Men With Unfavorable-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing High-Dose Radiation Therapy Alone

PURPOSE

To explore whether a subgroup of men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PC) exists in whom high-dose radiation therapy (RT) alone is sufficient to avoid excess PC death due to competing risk from cardiometabolic comorbidity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a cohort study of 7399 men in whom comorbidity (including congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, or myocardial infarction) was assessed and recorded with T1-3NxM0 PC treated with brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant RT, October 1997 to May 2013 at a single providing institution. Cox and competing risks regression analyses were used to assess whether men with unfavorable-intermediate/high-risk versus favorable-intermediate/low-risk PC were at increased risk of PC-specific, all-cause, or other-cause mortality (PCSM, ACM, OCM), adjusting for number of comorbidities, age at and year of brachytherapy, RT use, and an RT treatment propensity score.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 935 men died: 80 of PC and 855 of other causes. Among men with no comorbidity, PCSM risk (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-5.06], P=.001) and ACM risk (AHR 1.30 [95% CI 1.07-1.58], P=.007) were significantly increased in men with unfavorable-intermediate/high-risk PC versus favorable-intermediate/low-risk PC, with no difference in OCM (P=.07). Although PCSM risk was increased in men with 1 comorbidity (AHR 2.87 [95% CI 1.11-7.40], P=.029), ACM risk was not (AHR 1.03 [95% CI 0.78-1.36], P=.84). Neither PCSM risk (AHR 4.39 [95% CI 0.37-51.98], P=.24) or ACM risk (AHR 1.43 [95% CI 0.83-2.45], P=.20) was increased in men with 2 comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize death from PC, high-dose RT alone may be sufficient treatment in men with 2 or more cardiometabolic comorbidities and unfavorable-intermediate- and high-risk PC.

Comorbidity and the risk of all-cause and prostate cancer–specific mortality in men with unfavorable risk prostate cancer undergoing high dose radiation therapy alone

207

Background: An association between shortened survival and 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use has been observed in men with moderate to severe comorbidity undergoing external beam radiation therapy (RT) for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PC). Whether these men would benefit from treatment with high dose RT alone remains unknown and was explored. Methods: Between October 1997 and May 2013, 7533 men with T1-3NxM0 PC were treated with brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant RT at the Chicago Prostate Cancer Center. We used competing risks and Cox regression multivariable analyses to evaluate whether the risk of PC-specific and all-cause mortality (PCSM, ACM) were increased in men with unfavorable-intermediate or high risk as compared to favorable-intermediate or low risk PC undergoing brachytherapy adjusting for number of comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure), age at and year of brachytherapy, use of supplemental RT, and an RT treatment propensity score. Results: Of 7533 men treated with curative intent 5737 (76.2%), 1470 (19.5%) and 326 (4.3%) had no, 1, or 2 or more comorbidities respectively. After a median follow up of 7.7 years 958 men died, 81 (8.5%) and 877 (91.5%) of PC and other causes respectively. In the no comorbidity subgroup the risk of PCSM (Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 2.39; [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.32 to 4.31]; p = 0.004) and ACM (AHR: 1.25; [95% CI:1.05 to 1.50]; p= 0.013) were significantly increased in men with unfavorable-intermediate or high-risk PC as compared to favorable-intermediate or low risk PC; however, this was not the case in men with 1 or at least 2 comorbidities as shown in the table. Conclusions: Withholding ADT in men with unfavorable-intermediate or high-risk PC and at least 1 significant comorbidity did not appear to increase the risk of PCSM or shorten survival. [Table: see text]

TIF1γ protein regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition by operating as a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) E3 ligase for the transcriptional regulator SnoN1

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a fundamental cellular process that contributes to epithelial tissue morphogenesis during normal development and in tumor invasiveness and metastasis. The transcriptional regulator SnoN robustly influences EMT in response to the cytokine TGFβ, but the mechanisms that regulate the fundamental role of SnoN in TGFβ-induced EMT are not completely understood. Here we employ interaction proteomics to uncover the signaling protein TIF1γ as a specific interactor of SnoN1 but not the closely related isoform SnoN2. A 16-amino acid peptide within a unique region of SnoN1 mediates the interaction of SnoN1 with TIF1γ. Strikingly, although TIF1γ is thought to act as a ubiquitin E3 ligase, we find that TIF1γ operates as a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) E3 ligase that promotes the sumoylation of SnoN1 at distinct lysine residues. Importantly, TIF1γ-induced sumoylation is required for the ability of SnoN1 to suppress TGFβ-induced EMT, as assayed by the disruption of the morphogenesis of acini in a physiologically relevant three-dimensional model of normal murine mammary gland (NMuMG) epithelial cells. Collectively, our findings define a novel TIF1γ-SnoN1 sumoylation pathway that plays a critical role in EMT and has important implications for our understanding of TGFβ signaling and diverse biological processes in normal development and cancer biology.

FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center experience

The objective of our retrospective institutional experience is to report the overall response rate, R0 resection rate, progression-free survival, and safety/toxicity of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients with LAPC treated with FOLFIRINOX were identified via the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center pharmacy database. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and safety/tolerability data were compiled. Formal radiographic review was performed to determine overall response rates (ORRs). Twenty-two patients with LAPC began treatment with FOLFIRINOX between July 2010 and February 2012. The ORR was 27.3%, and the median progression-free survival was 11.7 months. Five of 22 patients were able to undergo R0 resections following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation. Three of the five patients have experienced distant recurrence within 5 months. Thirty-two percent of patients required at least one emergency department visit or hospitalization while being treated with FOLFIRINOX. FOLFIRINOX possesses substantial activity in patients with LAPC. The use of FOLFIRINOX was associated with conversion to resectability in >20% of patients. However, the recurrences following R0 resection in three of five patients and the toxicities observed with the use of this regimen raise important questions about how to best treat patients with LAPC.

An isoform-specific SnoN1-FOXO1 repressor complex controls neuronal morphogenesis and positioning in the mammalian brain

Control of neuronal positioning is fundamental to normal brain development. However, the cell-intrinsic mechanisms that govern neuronal positioning remain to be elucidated. Here, we report that the spliced protein products of the transcriptional regulator SnoN, SnoN1 and SnoN2, harbor opposing functions in the coordinate regulation of neuronal branching and positioning. Knockdown of SnoN2 stimulates axon branching in primary neurons and impairs migration of granule neurons in the rat cerebellar cortex in vivo. By contrast, SnoN1 knockdown suppresses SnoN2 knockdown-induced neuronal branching and strikingly triggers excessive migration of granule neurons in the cerebellar cortex. We also find that SnoN1 forms a complex with the transcription factor FOXO1 that represses the X-linked lissencephaly gene encoding doublecortin (DCX). Accordingly, repression of DCX mediates the ability of SnoN1 to regulate branching in primary neurons and granule neuron migration in vivo. These data define an isoform-specific SnoN1-FOXO1 transcriptional complex that orchestrates neuronal branching and positioning in the brain with important implications for the study of developmental disorders of cognition and epilepsy.

A SnoN-Ccd1 pathway promotes axonal morphogenesis in the mammalian brain

The transcriptional corepressor SnoN is a critical regulator of axonal morphogenesis, but how SnoN drives axonal growth is unknown. Here, we report that gene-profiling analyses in cerebellar granule neurons reveal that the large majority of genes altered upon SnoN knockdown are surprisingly downregulated, suggesting that SnoN may activate transcription in neurons. Accordingly, we find that the transcriptional coactivator p300 interacts with SnoN, and p300 plays a critical role in SnoN-induced axon growth. We also identify the gene encoding the signaling scaffold protein Ccd1 as a critical target of SnoN in neurons. Ccd1 localizes to the actin cytoskeleton, is enriched at axon terminals in neurons, and activates the axon growth-promoting kinase JNK (c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase). Knockdown of Ccd1 in neurons reduces axonal length and suppresses the ability of SnoN to promote axonal growth. Importantly, Ccd1 knockdown in rat pups profoundly impairs the formation of granule neuron parallel fiber axons in the rat cerebellar cortex in vivo. These findings define a novel SnoN-Ccd1 link that promotes axonal growth in the mammalian brain, with important implications for axonal development and regeneration.

ING2 as a novel mediator of transforming growth factor-beta-dependent responses in epithelial cells

Members of the ING (inhibitor of growth) family of chromatin modifying proteins (ING1-ING5) have emerged as critical regulators of gene expression and cellular responses, suggesting that the ING proteins may impinge on specific signal transduction pathways and their mediated effects. Here, we demonstrate a role for the protein ING2 in mediating responses by the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta-Smad signaling pathway. We show that ING2 promotes TGF-beta-induced transcription. Both gain-of-function and RNA interference-mediated knockdown of endogenous ING2 reveal that ING2 couples TGF-beta signals to the induction of transcription and cell cycle arrest. We also find that the Smad-interacting transcriptional modulator SnoN interacts with ING2 and promotes the assembly of a protein complex containing SnoN, ING2, and Smad2. Knockdown of endogenous SnoN blocks the ability of ING2 to promote TGF-beta-dependent transcription, and conversely expression of SnoN augments ING2 enhancement of the TGF-beta response. Collectively, our data suggest that ING2 collaborates with SnoN to mediate TGF-beta-induced Smad-dependent transcription and cellular responses.

Cell-intrinsic regulation of axonal morphogenesis by the Cdh1-APC target SnoN

Axonal growth is fundamental to the establishment of neuronal connectivity in the brain. However, the cell-intrinsic mechanisms that govern axonal morphogenesis remain to be elucidated. The ubiquitin ligase Cdh1-anaphase-promoting complex (Cdh1-APC) suppresses the growth of axons in postmitotic neurons. Here, we report that Cdh1-APC operates in the nucleus to inhibit axonal growth. We also identify the transcriptional corepressor SnoN as a key target of neuronal Cdh1-APC that promotes axonal growth. Cdh1 forms a physical complex with SnoN and stimulates the ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of SnoN in neurons. Knockdown of SnoN in neurons significantly reduces axonal growth and suppresses Cdh1 RNAi enhancement of axonal growth. In addition, SnoN knockdown in vivo suggests an essential function for SnoN in the development of granule neuron parallel fibers in the cerebellar cortex. These findings define Cdh1-APC and SnoN as components of a cell-intrinsic pathway that orchestrates axonal morphogenesis in a transcription-dependent manner in the mammalian brain.