The I-frame vs. S-frame: how neoliberalism has led behavioral sciences astray

In their recently published paper, Chater and Loewenstein critically elaborate on the differences between interventions that focus on individual behavior ('i-frame'), as opposed to the systems in which health behavior occurs ('s-frame'). They point out that behavioral scientists frequently rely on individual-level interventions, rather than systemic change to improve population health. As individual-level interventions have fallen short of the author's expectations to fix health problems, the authors argue that behavioral scientists should focus more on system-level change. They warn behavioral scientists that by framing disease as an individual problem they hinder real change. We agree with the arguments made by the authors; nevertheless, we propose that bringing underlying causes for the i-frame focus to light would advance their argument. In our commentary, we discuss that neoliberalism might be a reason for the focus on individual interventions in behavioral health sciences.

Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause thrombotic events that lead to severe complications or death. Antiplatelet agents, such as acetylsalicylic acid, have been shown to effectively reduce thrombotic events in other diseases: they could influence the course of COVID-19 in general.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of antiplatelets given with standard care compared to no treatment or standard care (with/without placebo) for adults with COVID-19.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (which comprises MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, medRxiv, CENTRAL), Web of Science, WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease and the Epistemonikos COVID-19 L*OVE Platform to identify completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions to December 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antiplatelet agents for the treatment of COVID-19 in adults with COVID-19, irrespective of disease severity, gender or ethnicity.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard Cochrane methodology. To assess bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) for RCTs. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Antiplatelets plus standard care versus standard care (with/without placebo) Adults with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe COVID-19 We included four studies (17,541 participants) that recruited hospitalised people with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe COVID-19. A total of 8964 participants were analysed in the antiplatelet arm (either with cyclooxygenase inhibitors or P2Y12 inhibitors) and 8577 participants in the control arm. Most people were older than 50 years and had comorbidities such as hypertension, lung disease or diabetes. The studies were conducted in high- to lower middle-income countries prior to wide-scale vaccination programmes. Antiplatelets compared to standard care: - probably result in little to no difference in 28-day mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.05; 3 studies, 17,249 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). In absolute terms, this means that for every 177 deaths per 1000 people not receiving antiplatelets, there were 168 deaths per 1000 people who did receive the intervention (95% CI 151 to 186 per 1000 people); - probably result in little to no difference in worsening (new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death up to day 28) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.01; 2 studies, 15,266 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); - probably result in little to no difference in improvement (participants discharged alive up to day 28) (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.04; 2 studies, 15,454 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); - probably result in a slight reduction of thrombotic events at longest follow-up (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.02; 4 studies, 17,518 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); - may result in a slight increase in serious adverse events at longest follow-up (Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.57, 95% CI 0.48 to 5.14; 1 study, 1815 participants; low-certainty evidence), but non-serious adverse events during study treatment were not reported; - probably increase the occurrence of major bleeding events at longest follow-up (Peto OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.19; 4 studies, 17,527 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adults with a confirmed diagnosis of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19 We included two RCTs allocating participants, of whom 4209 had confirmed mild COVID-19 and were not hospitalised. A total of 2109 participants were analysed in the antiplatelet arm (treated with acetylsalicylic acid) and 2100 participants in the control arm. No study included people with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antiplatelets compared to standard care: - may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality at day 45 (Peto OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.22; 2 studies, 4209 participants; low-certainty evidence); - may slightly decrease the incidence of new thrombotic events up to day 45 (Peto OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.46; 2 studies, 4209 participants; low-certainty evidence); - may make little or no difference to the incidence of serious adverse events up to day 45 (Peto OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.64; 1 study, 3881 participants; low-certainty evidence), but non-serious adverse events were not reported. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of antiplatelets on the following outcomes (compared to standard care plus placebo): - admission to hospital or death up to day 45 (Peto OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.10; 2 studies, 4209 participants; very low-certainty evidence); - major bleeding events up to longest follow-up (no event occurred in 328 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Quality of life and adverse events during study treatment were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and moderate to severe disease, we found moderate-certainty evidence that antiplatelets probably result in little to no difference in 28-day mortality, clinical worsening or improvement, but probably result in a slight reduction in thrombotic events. They probably increase the occurrence of major bleeding events. Low-certainty evidence suggests that antiplatelets may result in a slight increase in serious adverse events. In people with confirmed COVID-19 and mild symptoms, we found low-certainty evidence that antiplatelets may result in little to no difference in 45-day mortality and serious adverse events, and may slightly reduce thrombotic events. The effects on the combined outcome admission to hospital or death up to day 45 and major bleeding events are very uncertain. Quality of life was not reported. Included studies were conducted in high- to lower middle-income settings using antiplatelets prior to vaccination roll-outs. We identified a lack of evidence concerning quality of life assessments, adverse events and people with asymptomatic infection. The 14 ongoing and three completed, unpublished RCTs that we identified in trial registries address similar settings and research questions as in the current body of evidence. We expect to incorporate the findings of these studies in future versions of this review.

Socio-economic inequalities in body mass index among preschool children: do sports programs in early childhood education and care centers make a difference?

Background

Overweight in childhood is considered to be one of the most serious public health challenges. Many studies have investigated individual-level determinants of children's body mass index (BMI), yet studies exploring determinants at the meso-level are sparse. The aim of our study was to examine how a sports focus at early childhood education and care (ECEC) centers moderates the effect of parental socio-economic position (SEP) on children's BMI.

Methods

We used data from the German National Educational Panel Study and included 1,891 children (955 boys and 936 girls) from 224 ECEC centers in our analysis. Linear multilevel regressions were used to estimate the main effects of family SEP and the ECEC center sports focus, as well as their interaction, on children's BMI. All analyses were stratified by sex and adjusted for age, migration background, number of siblings, and employment status of parents.

Results

Our analysis confirmed the wellknown health inequalities in childhood overweight with a social gradient toward a higher BMI for children from lower SEP families. An interactive effect between family SEP and ECEC center sports focus was found. Boys with low family SEP not attending a sports-focused ECEC center had the highest BMI among all boys. In contrast, boys with low family SEP attending a sports-focused ECEC center had the lowest BMI. For girls, no association regarding ECEC center focus or interactive effects emerged. Girls with a high SEP had the lowest BMI, independent of the ECEC center focus.

Conclusion

We provided evidence for the gender-specific relevance of sports-focused ECEC centers for the prevention of overweight. Especially boys from low SEP families benefited from a sports focus, whereas for girls the family's SEP was more relevant. As a consequence, gender differences in determinants for BMI at different levels and their interaction should be considered in further research and preventive measures. Our research indicates that ECEC centers may decrease health inequalities by providing opportunities for physical activity.

Understanding perceived addiction to and addictiveness of electronic cigarettes among electronic cigarette users: a cross-sectional analysis of the International Tobacco Control Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) England Survey

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The addictive potential of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) remains to be fully understood. We identified patterns and correlates of perceived addiction to e-cigarettes and perceived addictiveness of e-cigarettes relative to tobacco cigarettes (relative addictiveness) in dual users as well as exclusive e-cigarette users.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Observational study using cross-sectional survey data from England (2016) from the International Tobacco Control Project (ITC) Four Country Smoking and Vaping (4CV) survey. The study comprised 832 current e-cigarette users who had been vaping for at least 4 months.

MEASUREMENTS

Perceived addiction to e-cigarettes and relative addictiveness of e-cigarettes were examined. Socio-demographic factors were age, gender and education; markers of addiction included urge to vape, time to first vape after waking and nicotine strength used; vaping and smoking characteristics included frequency and duration of e-cigarette use, intention to quit, adjustable power or temperature, enjoyment, satisfaction relative to tobacco cigarettes and tobacco cigarette smoking status.

FINDINGS

A total of 17% of participants reported feeling very addicted to e-cigarettes, while 40% considered e-cigarettes equally/more addictive than tobacco cigarettes. Those who felt very addicted had higher odds of regarding e-cigarettes as more addictive than tobacco cigarettes (odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 2.3-5.1). All markers of addiction, daily use and enjoyment were associated with higher perceived addiction, whereas time to first vape after waking, daily vaping and perceiving vaping as less satisfying than smoking were associated with relative addictiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Markers of addiction to e-cigarettes appear to correspond with perceived addiction to e-cigarettes, suggesting that self-reported perceived addiction might serve as an indicator of addiction. Prevalence both of markers of addiction and perceived addiction were comparatively low overall, suggesting a limited but relevant addictive potential of e-cigarettes. Additionally, positive and negative reinforcement, reflected here by enjoyment and relative satisfaction, might play a role in e-cigarette addiction.

Addictive Potential of e-Cigarettes as Reported in e-Cigarette Online Forums: Netnographic Analysis of Subjective Experiences

BACKGROUND

While e-cigarettes usually contain nicotine, their addictive potential is not yet fully understood. We hypothesized that if e-cigarettes are addictive, users will experience typical symptoms of addiction.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate whether and how e-cigarette users report signs of addiction.

METHODS

We identified 3 large German-language e-cigarette online forums via a systematic Google search. Based on a netnographic approach, we used deductive content analysis to investigate relevant posts in these forums. Netnography has the advantage of limiting the social desirability bias that prevails in face-to-face research, such as focus groups. The data were coded according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria for tobacco use disorder, adapted for e-cigarettes. The DSM-5 criteria were used to portray a broad spectrum of possible experiences of addiction.

RESULTS

Overall, 5337 threads in 3 forums were screened, and 451 threads containing relevant information were included in the analysis. Users reported experiences consistent with the DSM-5 criteria, such as craving e-cigarettes, excessive time spent vaping, and health issues related to e-cigarette use. However, our analysis also showed that users reported the absence of typical tobacco use disorder criteria, such as successful attempts to reduce the nicotine dosage. For most themes, reports of their absence were more frequent than of their presence. The absence of perceived addiction was mostly reported in contrast to prior tobacco smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to use a netnographic approach to explore unfiltered self-reports of experiences of e-cigarette addiction by users in online forums. As hypothesized, some but not all users reported subjective experiences that corresponded to the criteria of tobacco use disorder as defined by the DSM-5. Nevertheless, subjective reports also indicated that many e-cigarette users felt in control of their behavior, especially in contrast to their prior use of tobacco cigarettes. The finding that some e-cigarette users subjectively experience addiction highlights the need for effective cessation programs to support users who experience their e-cigarette use as burdensome. This research can guide the refinement of instruments to assess e-cigarette addiction and guide cessation programs.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.1186/s40359-021-00682-8.

The Reporting, Use, and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming increasingly important in supporting clinical outcomes in clinical trials. In multiple myeloma (MM), PRO measurement is useful to reveal how treatment affects physical, psychosocial, and functional behaviour as well as symptoms and treatment-related adverse events to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of a particular drug or drug combination. We report the types of PRO instruments used in MM, the frequency in which they are utilised in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and the consistency of their reporting.

METHODS

The European Hematology Association (EHA) supports the development of guidelines for the use of PROs in adult patients with haematological malignancies. The first step is the present systematic review of the literature. MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs in MM between 2015 and 2020. Study design, characteristics of MM and its treatment, the primary outcomes, and the types of PRO instrument(s) were extracted using a predefined template. Additionally, in a stepwise approach, it was assessed whether the identified instruments had been validated for multiple myeloma patients, patients with haematological malignancies, or cancer patients.

RESULTS

Following screening for RCTs, 283 studies were included for review from 10,707 records retrieved, and 118 of these planned the use of PRO measures. Thirty-eight PRO instruments were reported. The most frequently used instrument (92 studies) was the EORTC QLQ-30. The EORTC-MY20 MM-specific questionnaire was the second most frequently used (50 studies), together with the EQ-5D (50 studies). Only 19 PRO instruments reported were consistent with the trial registry. Furthermore, in 58 publications, the information on PRO instruments differed between the publication and the trial registry. Further, information on PRO in HTA reports was available for 26 studies, of which 18 reports were consistent with the trial registries. Out of the 38 instruments used, six had been validated for patients with multiple myeloma (the most frequently used), six for patients with haematological malignancies, and 10 for cancer patients in general.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that the measurement of PROs in RCTs for MM is underutilised, underreported, and often inconsistent. Guidelines for the appropriate use of PROs in MM are needed to ensure standardisation in selection and reporting. Furthermore, not all PRO instruments identified have been validated for myeloma patients or patients with haematological malignancies. Thus, guidelines for the appropriate use and reporting of PROs are needed in MM to ensure standardisation in the selection and reporting of PROs.

Understanding addiction in e-cigarette users – the EVAPE project

Background

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are often advertised as a healthier option to combustible cigarettes and as smoking cessation aid. However, e-cigarettes are a growing health concern and their addictive potential remains to be fully understood. Within the EValuation of the Addictive Potential of E-cigarettes (EVAPE) project, we studied subjective and objective measures of addiction in relation to e-cigarette use.

Methods

This cross-sectional analysis was based on 832 participants of the first wave (2016) of England from the ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping (4CV) Survey, who were using e-cigarettes daily or weekly for at least four months. Perceived addiction to e-cigarettes was categorised as very vs. not/somewhat addicted, and perceived addictiveness of e-cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes as equally/more addictive vs. less addictive. Objective measures of addiction included urge to vape, time to first vape after waking, frequency of use, and used nicotine strength. We examined associations between these objective and subjective measures of addiction using multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender, education, and cigarette smoking.

Results

17.8% of participants reported feeling very addicted to e-cigarettes and 42.3% considered e-cigarettes equally/more addictive than combustible cigarettes. Those who felt very addicted had higher odds of regarding e-cigarettes as more addictive (OR 3.43 (95%-CI 2.29-5.19)). All objective measures of addiction were associated with higher perceived addiction, whereas only a shorter time to first vape was associated with perceived product addictiveness.

Conclusions

Subjective measures of addiction to e-cigarettes, in particular perceived addiction, correspond with objective measures. Understanding the addictive potential of e-cigarettes is the cornerstone for developing new strategies for prevention and treatment, and ultimately understanding their role from a public health perspective.

Key messages

A matter of freedom? Right-wing populist frames of Austria’s smoke-free policy

Background

Even though right-wing populist parties (RWPP) are increasingly influential in Europe, their position on public health has hardly been researched. I aimed to fill this research gap by focusing on the case of the FPÖ (Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs) and its opposition to Austriás smoke-free policy. Understanding RWWP positions on health policy can help to prevent detrimental influences on health policy making. Therefore, this project aimed to investigate how the FPÖ framed Austria’s smoke-free policy and whether newspaper articles reflect these frames.

Methods

Online archives of the three most-read Austrian newspapers (Standard, Kurier, Kronenzeitung) were searched for articles on the policy published in November 2019, when the policy was implemented. Furthermore, speeches by FPÖ politicians in the parliamentary debate on the policy in June 2019 were identified via the parliamentary archive. Drawing on 4 speeches by FPÖ politicians and 29 newspaper articles, I used frame analysis to answer the research question.

Results

The analysis yielded that FPÖ politicians used authoritarian, populist, and libertarian frames to argue against the implementation of the smoke-free policy. Thus, the policy was portrayed as not being in the interest of the people, restricting personal and economic freedom, and as elitist. These frames were not reflected in newspaper reports that mainly focused on the practical aspects of the policy implementation. However, in contrast to politicians supporting the policy, FPÖ politicians were overrepresented in newspaper reports representing 47% of political actors cited in newspaper articles.

Conclusions

Authoritarian, populist, and libertarian frames were used by the FPÖ in opposition to the smoke-free policy. While these frames were not replicated by Austrian newspapers, RWP politicians were overrepresented in articles on the policy. These findings illustrate the importance of effective counter-framing by health advocates.

Key messages

• RWPP used authoritarian, populist, and libertarian frames to oppose Austria’s smoke-free policy.

• Even though RWPP frames were not replicated in newspaper articles, RWPP politicians were overrepresented in reports on the policy.

Immunity after COVID-19 vaccination in people with higher risk of compromised immune status: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

High efficacy in terms of protection from severe COVID-19 has been demonstrated for several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. However, patients with compromised immune status develop a weaker and less stable immune response to vaccination. Strong immune response may not always translate into clinical benefit, therefore it is important to synthesise evidence on modified schemes and types of vaccination in these population subgroups for guiding health decisions. As the literature on COVID-19 vaccines continues to expand, we aimed to scope the literature on multiple subgroups to subsequently decide on the most relevant research questions to be answered by systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the availability of existing literature on immune response and long-term clinical outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination, and to map this evidence according to the examined populations, specific vaccines, immunity parameters, and their way of determining relevant long-term outcomes and the availability of mapping between immune reactivity and relevant outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the World Health Organization COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease on 6 December 2021.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that published results on immunity outcomes after vaccination with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, AZD1222, Ad26.COV2.S, Sputnik V or Sputnik Light, BBIBP-CorV, or CoronaVac on predefined vulnerable subgroups such as people with malignancies, transplant recipients, people undergoing renal replacement therapy, and people with immune disorders, as well as pregnant and breastfeeding women, and children. We included studies if they had at least 100 participants (not considering healthy control groups); we excluded case studies and case series.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently and in duplicate onto an online data extraction form. Data were represented as tables and as online maps to show the frequency of studies for each item. We mapped the data according to study design, country of participant origin, patient comorbidity subgroup, intervention, outcome domains (clinical, safety, immunogenicity), and outcomes.  MAIN RESULTS: Out of 25,452 identified records, 318 studies with a total of more than 5 million participants met our eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Participants were recruited mainly from high-income countries between January 2020 and 31 October 2021 (282/318); the majority of studies included adult participants (297/318).  Haematological malignancies were the most commonly examined comorbidity group (N = 54), followed by solid tumours (N = 47), dialysis (N = 48), kidney transplant (N = 43), and rheumatic diseases (N = 28, 17, and 15 for mixed diseases, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease, respectively). Thirty-one studies included pregnant or breastfeeding women. The most commonly administered vaccine was BNT162b2 (N = 283), followed by mRNA-1273 (N = 153), AZD1222 (N = 66), Ad26.COV2.S (N = 42), BBIBP-CorV (N = 15), CoronaVac (N = 14), and Sputnik V (N = 5; no studies were identified for Sputnik Light). Most studies reported outcomes after regular vaccination scheme.  The majority of studies focused on immunogenicity outcomes, especially seroconversion based on binding antibody measurements and immunoglobulin G (IgG) titres (N = 179 and 175, respectively). Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in 126 and 54 studies, whilst SARS-CoV-2 infection irrespective of severity was reported in 80 studies. Mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 36 studies. Please refer to our evidence gap maps for more detailed information.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Up to 6 December 2021, the majority of studies examined data on mRNA vaccines administered as standard vaccination schemes (two doses approximately four to eight weeks apart) that report on immunogenicity parameters or adverse events. Clinical outcomes were less commonly reported, and if so, were often reported as a secondary outcome observed in seroconversion or immunoglobulin titre studies. As informed by this scoping review, two effectiveness reviews (on haematological malignancies and kidney transplant recipients) are currently being conducted.

Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Vaccines are effective in preventing severe COVID-19, a disease for which few treatments are available and which can lead to disability or death. Widespread vaccination against COVID-19 may help protect those not yet able to get vaccinated. In addition, new and vaccine-resistant mutations of SARS-CoV-2 may be less likely to develop if the spread of COVID-19 is limited. Different vaccines are now widely available in many settings. However, vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to the goal of nationwide vaccination in many countries and poses a substantial threat to population health. This scoping review maps interventions aimed at increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake and decreasing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

OBJECTIVES

To scope the existing research landscape on interventions to enhance the willingness of different populations to be vaccinated against COVID-19, increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake, or decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and to map the evidence according to addressed populations and intervention categories.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded and Emerging Sources Citation Index), WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to 11 October 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies that assess the impact of interventions implemented to enhance the willingness of different populations to be vaccinated against COVID-19, increase vaccine uptake, or decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies of intervention (NRSIs), observational studies and case studies with more than 100 participants. Furthermore, we included systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We did not limit the scope of the review to a specific population or to specific outcomes assessed. We excluded interventions addressing hesitancy towards vaccines for diseases other than COVID-19.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were analysed according to a protocol uploaded to the Open Science Framework. We used an interactive scoping map to visualise the results of our scoping review. We mapped the identified interventions according to pre-specified intervention categories, that were adapted to better fit the evidence. The intervention categories were: communication interventions, policy interventions, educational interventions, incentives (both financial and non-financial), interventions to improve access, and multidimensional interventions. The study outcomes were also included in the mapping. Furthermore, we mapped the country in which the study was conducted, the addressed population, and whether the design was randomised-controlled or not.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 96 studies in the scoping review, 35 of which are ongoing and 61 studies with published results. We did not identify any relevant systematic reviews. For an overview, please see the interactive scoping map (https://tinyurl.com/2p9jmx24) STUDIES WITH PUBLISHED RESULTS Of the 61 studies with published results, 46 studies were RCTs and 15 NRSIs. The interventions investigated in the studies were heterogeneous with most studies testing communication strategies to enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Most studies assessed the willingness to get vaccinated as an outcome. The majority of studies were conducted in English-speaking high-income countries. Moreover, most studies investigated digital interventions in an online setting. Populations that were addressed were diverse. For example, studies targeted healthcare workers, ethnic minorities in the USA, students, soldiers, at-risk patients, or the general population.  ONGOING STUDIES Of the 35 ongoing studies, 29 studies are RCTs and six NRSIs. Educational and communication interventions were the most used types of interventions. The majority of ongoing studies plan to assess vaccine uptake as an outcome. Again, the majority of studies are being conducted in English-speaking high-income countries. In contrast to the studies with published results, most ongoing studies will not be conducted online. Addressed populations range from minority populations in the USA to healthcare workers or students. Eleven ongoing studies have estimated completion dates in 2022.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We were able to identify and map a variety of heterogeneous interventions for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake or decreasing vaccine hesitancy. Our results demonstrate that this is an active field of research with 61 published studies and 35 studies still ongoing. This review gives a comprehensive overview of interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake and can be the foundation for subsequent systematic reviews on the effectiveness of interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake.  A research gap was shown for studies conducted in low and middle-income countries and studies investigating policy interventions and improved access, as well as for interventions addressing children and adolescents. As COVID-19 vaccines become more widely available, these populations and interventions should not be neglected in research.

AUTHORS CONCLUSIONS

We were able to identify and map a variety of heterogeneous interventions for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake or decreasing vaccine hesitancy. Our results demonstrate that this is an active field of research with 61 published studies and 35 studies still ongoing. This review gives a comprehensive overview of interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake and can be the foundation for subsequent systematic reviews on the effectiveness of interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake.  A research gap was shown for studies conducted in low and middle-income countries and studies investigating policy interventions and improved access, as well as for interventions addressing children and adolescents. As COVID-19 vaccines become more widely available, these populations and interventions should not be neglected in research.

OP0279 CAR-T CELL TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS- SAFETY AND PRELIMINARY EFFICACY DATA FROM THE FIRST FOUR PATIENTS

Background

While treatment of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has substantially improved, a subset of patients experiences severe progressive disease despite T- and B cell targeted therapy. Furthermore, drug-free remission and seroconversion is difficult to achieve in SLE to date

Objectives

To study the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of deep B cell depletion using autologous CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in patients with severe and treatment-refractory SLE

Methods

The CAR product was manufactured by CliniMACS Prodigy system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). T-cells were enriched from the patients’ peripheral blood apheresis product and 1x108 cells were used as starting cell population. The cells were transfected with a lentiviral vector encoding an anti-CD19 CAR is composed of the FMC63 scFv, a CD8- derived hinge region, TNFRSF19-derived transmembrane domain, CD3ζ intracellular domain, and 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain (Miltenyi Biotec) and expanded for 12 days. After conditioning with cyclophosphamide/ fludarabine patients received 1x106 CD19-CAR-T cells/kg body weight as a single infusion. All SLE treatments with the exception of low dose prednisolone were stopped before CAR-T cell administration. After CAR-T cell treatment, also prednisolone was stopped. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring for Cytokine-release syndrome (CRS), immune-related effector cell neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and infections. Preliminary efficacy was assessed by reaching a Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), seroconversion in dsDNA antibodies and ANA and cessation of all SLE-specific treatments

Results

As of January 22, 2022, our 4 SLE patients had been treated with CD19 CAR-T cells with a follow up of 10 months (patient 1, female aged 20, SLEDAI-2K: 16), 7 months (patient 2, male aged 22; SLEDAI-2K:8), 2 months (patient 3, female aged 22; SLEDAI 2K: 6), and 1 month (patient 4; female aged 24; SLEDAI-2K: 6), respectively. All patients had active severe SLE with failure of standard treatment including pulsed steroids, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, intravenous immunoglobulins, rituximab and belimumab before CD19 CAR-T cell administration. All patients had active kidney disease. No infections occurred. All four patients experienced fever without proof of infectious disease (CRS °I); only one patient was treated with a single dose of tocilizumab. No ICANS and no CRS of other organs occurred. In vivo, CAR-T cells rapidly expanded to a maximum of 27,6% (day 9, patient 1), 41,2% (day 9, patient 2), 11,5% (day 9, patient 3) and 59,1% (day 9, patient 4) of total circulating T cells followed by a typical decline, with circulating CAR-T cells being continuously detectable during the next months. Expansion of CAR T cells preceded the complete and sustained depletion of circulating B cells. Patient 1 experienced sustained drug-free remission (SLEDAI-2K=0) with complete loss of ANA and dsDNA antibodies despite reappearance of B cells at 6 months. Patient 2 also experienced complete loss of ANA and dsDNA antibodies with B cells not yet returned. Low-level proteinuria remained most likely due to previously accrued damage in glomerular filter function (SLEDAI-2K: 2). Patient 3 and patient 4 had a shorter observation period to date but also achieved clinical remission (both SLEDAI-2K 0). All patients met LLDAS and could successfully stop all SLE-specific medication, including glucocorticoids. No SLE flare occurred so far.

Conclusion

Taken together, these data show that CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is well tolerated and may induce rapid remission of severe refractory SLE.

References

[1]Mougiakakos D et al., CD19-Targeted CAR T Cells in Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2021;385:567-569.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Young people’s experiences of COVID-19 messaging at the start of the UK lockdown: lessons for positive engagement and information sharing

Background

To reduce COVID-19 infection rates during the initial stages of the pandemic, the UK Government mandated a strict period of restriction on freedom of movement or ‘lockdown’. For young people, closure of schools and higher education institutions and social distancing rules may have been particularly challenging, coming at a critical time in their lives for social and emotional development. This study explored young people’s experiences of the UK Government’s initial response to the pandemic and related government messaging.

Methods

This qualitative study combines data from research groups at the University of Southampton, University of Edinburgh and University College London. Thirty-six online focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 150 young people (Southampton: n = 69; FGD = 7; Edinburgh: n = 41; FGD = 5; UCL: n = 40; FGD = 24). Thematic analysis was conducted to explore how young people viewed the government’s response and messaging and to develop recommendations for how to best involve young people in addressing similar crises in the future.

Results

The abrupt onset of lockdown left young people shocked, confused and feeling ignored by government and media messaging. Despite this, they were motivated to adhere to government advice by the hope that life might soon return to normal. They felt a responsibility to help with the pandemic response, and wanted to be productive with their time, but saw few opportunities to volunteer.

Conclusions

Young people want to be listened to and feel they have a part to play in responding to a national crisis such as the COVID-19 epidemic. To reduce the likelihood of disenfranchising the next generation, Government and the media should focus on developing messaging that reflects young people’s values and concerns and to provide opportunities for young people to become involved in responses to future crises.

Clinical outcomes of pacemaker implantations before and after cancer diagnosis

Background

Cardiotoxicity caused by anticancer treatment affects cardiac conduction. Clinical outcomes of pacemaker patients with newly diagnosed cancer are insufficiently understood.

Purpose

The aim was to investigate the effect of anticancer therapy on pacemaker properties.

Methods

All patients with pacemaker and confirmed cancer diagnosis treated with chemotherapy at our tertiary university hospital were included in this study. The pacemaker database (containing pacemaker related information) was matched with hospital-wide electronic health records (containing cancer types, comorbidities and echo data). Survival data were retrieved from the Statistics Austria Federal Institute. Clinical and pacemaker data of patients with previously diagnosed cancer requiring pacemaker implantation (Group A) were compared to patients with pre-existing pacemaker followed by cancer diagnosis (Group B).

Results

Out of 972 included patients, 295 patients (30.3%) had the pacemaker implantation after their first cancer diagnosis (Group A), and 677 patients (69.7%) had already a pacemaker before their first cancer diagnosis (Group B). Cancer types are displayed in Figure 1. The following cancer types were associated with increased likelihood for pacemaker implantation after cancer diagnosis (Group A): kidney cancer (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.83, P=0.02), lymphomas (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.26, P=0.01), and eye cancer (OR 9.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 83.50, P=0.047). Patients in Group A were older at pacemaker implantation (76.0 years [IQR 68.0–82.2] vs. 72.1 years [IQR 64.3–78.0], P<0.001), and single-chamber pacemakers were less frequent (21.8% vs. 32.1%, P=0.001). Pacemaker implantation due to bradycardic atrial fibrillation was less frequent in Group A (15.6% vs. 21.8%, P=0.03), but implantation due to an “unspecified” indication was increased (20.6% vs. 12.7%, P=0.002). Patients in Group A had lower pacing threshold at baseline but had a stronger increase in pacing threshold during the follow-up as indicated in Table 1. No differences regarding left or right ventricular function, left or right end-diastolic diameter, or mitral or tricuspid regurgitation were detected between the groups. Patients in Group A had smaller left atria (59.7±10.7mm vs. 63.9±24.0mm, P=0.02) and smaller right atria (57.9±10.4mm vs. 61.2±11.8mm, P=0.001). Patients with cancer diagnosis requiring pacemaker had worse 10-year survival (31.2% vs. 51.1%, log-rank P<0.001) as shown in Figure 1.

Conclusion

Kidney cancer, lymphoma, and cancer of the eye were associated with increased probability of pacemaker implantation after cancer diagnosis. The significant increase in pacing threshold in patients undergoing chemotherapy could be associated with chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Union's Horizon 2020 Future and Emerging Technologies Programme Figure 1. Cancer types and survivalTable 1. Baseline characteristics

The prognostic impact of fibroblast growth factor-23 on cardiovascular death after cardiac surgery

Background

Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) participates in phosphate and vitamin D metabolism and proved to be associated with an increased risk for fatal events in individuals presenting with cardiovascular disease. In the era of personalized medicine and individualized prognostication, the identification of novel risk markers seems of major importance in terms of state-of-the-art patient care. Since data on the prognostic potential of FGF-23 in individuals undergoing cardiac valve and/or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remain scarce, we aimed to investigate the impact of FGF-23 on cardiovascular (CV) death in an unselected patient population after cardiac surgery.

Methods

Within the present investigation, patients undergoing elective cardiac valve and/or CABG surgery were prospectively enrolled at the Department of Cardiac Surgery of our Medical University. Preoperative blood values were assessed immediately before the surgical intervention. FGF-23 concentrations were measured via FGF Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA). Patients were followed prospectively until the primary study endpoint (CV death) was reached. Cox regression models were calculated and adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, heart failure, body mass index, prior myocardial infarction, hypertension and coronary artery disease.

Results

In total, 462 patients were included in the present analysis and followed over a median of 3.9 years. During follow-up 67 (14.5%) patients died. The patients' median age was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR] 60 to 75) and 133 (28.8%) were female. The median FGF level in the entire study population was 1.9 pmol/L (IQR 1.2 to 3.5). After stratification into tertiles (T) of FGF-23 (median FGF-23 T1: 0.95 pmol/L [IQR 0.65 to 1.19], T2: 1.93 pmol/L [IQR 1.64 to 2.28] T3: 4.80 pmol/L [IQR 3.54 to 8.09]), patients in the highest FGF-23 tertile had highest rates of CV death (T1: 4.8%, T2: 6.8%, T3: 19.1%; P-logrank <0.001; Figure A). Moreover, there was a strong association between FGF-23 and CV death (Adj. hazard ratio for 1-unit increase in standardized log-transformed biomarker 1.44, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.75; P-value <0.001). The risk of CV death increased within higher tertiles of FGF-23 (T3: adj. HR 3.59 [95% CI 1.48–8.71], P-value= 0.005) (T1 was chosen as reference). FGF23 also showed good discriminatory performance (area under the curve [AUC] 0.69, 95% CI 0.61–0.77).

Conclusion

FGF-23 proved to be a strong and independent predictor for CV death in individuals undergoing elective cardiac valve and/or CABG surgery. This biomarker may provide improved risk assessment and fosters individualized patient care in this highly vulnerable patient population in the era of personalized medicine.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves

Cerebral protection in TAVR – can we do without? Impact on stroke rate, length of hospital stay and 12-month mortality

 

Stroke associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a potentially devastating complication. Until recently, the Sentinel™ Cerebral Protection System (CPS; Boston Scientific) has been the only commercially available device for mechanical prevention of TAVR-related stroke. However, its effectiveness is still undetermined.

Methods

Between January 2019 and August 2020 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to TAVR with or without Sentinel™ in a 1:1 fashion. We defined as primary endpoint clinically detectable cerebrovascular events within 72 hours after TAVR, and as secondary endpoints LOS and 12-month mortality. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to assess associations of Sentinel™ use with endpoints.

Results

Of 411 patients (80±7 y/o, 47.4% female, EuroSCORE II 6.3±5.9%), Sentinel™ was used in 213 (51.8%), with both filters correctly deployed in 189 (46.0%). 20 (4.9%) cerebrovascular events were recorded, 10 (2.4%) of which were disabling strokes. Sentinel™ reduced cerebrovascular events in univariate analysis by 71% (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11–0.82; p=0.02) and after multivariate adjustment by 75% (adj. OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08–0.80; p=0.02). Sentinel™ use was also significantly associated with shorter LOS (8.4±9.6 versus 6.7±6.1 days; p=0.03) and lower 12-month all-cause mortality (15.7% versus 7.5%, p=0.01).

Conclusions

In the present prospective all-comers TAVR cohort, Sentinel™ significantly 1) reduced cerebrovascular events, 2) shortened LOS, and 3) improved 12-month survival. These data promote the use of a CPS when implanting TAVR valves.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Plasma and Lung Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline Fosamil in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: an In Vivo Microdialysis Study

Ceftaroline fosamil, a fifth-generation cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), is currently approved for the treatment of pneumonia and complicated skin and soft tissue infections. However, pharmacokinetics data on free lung tissue concentrations in critical patient populations are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the high-dose regimen of ceftaroline in plasma and lung tissue in cardiac surgery patients during intermittent and continuous administration. Nine patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass were included in this study and randomly assigned to intermittent or continuous administration. Eighteen hundred milligrams of ceftaroline fosamil was administered intravenously as either 600 mg over 2 h every 8 h (q8h) (intermittent group) or 600 mg over 2 h (loading dose) plus 1,200 mg over 22 h (continuous group). Interstitial lung tissue concentrations were measured by in vivo microdialysis. Relevant pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated for each group. Plasma exposure levels during intermittent and continuous administration were comparable to those of previously published studies and did not differ significantly between the two groups. In vivo microdialysis demonstrated reliable and adequate penetration of ceftaroline into lung tissue during intermittent and continuous administration. The steady-state area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUCss 0-8) and the ratio of AUCSS 0-8 in lung tissue and AUC in plasma (AUClung/plasma) were descriptively higher in the continuous group. Continuous administration of ceftaroline fosamil achieved a significantly higher proportion of time for which the free drug concentration remained above 4 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) during the dosing interval (% fT>4xMIC) than intermittent administration for pathogens with a MIC of 1 mg/liter. Ceftaroline showed adequate penetration into interstitial lung tissue of critically ill patients undergoing major cardiothoracic surgery, supporting its use for pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens.

Interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

Individuals dying of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may experience distressing symptoms such as breathlessness or delirium. Palliative symptom management can alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life of patients. Various treatment options such as opioids or breathing techniques have been discussed for use in COVID-19 patients. However, guidance on symptom management of COVID-19 patients in palliative care has often been derived from clinical experiences and guidelines for the treatment of patients with other illnesses. An understanding of the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological palliative interventions to manage specific symptoms of COVID-19 patients is required.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control in individuals with COVID-19.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), medRxiv); Web of Science Core Collection (Science Citation Index Expanded, Emerging Sources); CINAHL; WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease; and COAP Living Evidence on COVID-19 to identify completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions until 23 March 2021. We screened the reference lists of relevant review articles and current treatment guidelines for further literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We followed standard Cochrane methodology as outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We included studies evaluating palliative symptom management for individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 receiving interventions for palliative symptom control, with no restrictions regarding comorbidities, age, gender, or ethnicity. Interventions comprised pharmacological as well as non-pharmacological treatment (e.g. acupressure, physical therapy, relaxation, or breathing techniques). We searched for the following types of studies: randomized controlled trials (RCT), quasi-RCTs, controlled clinical trials, controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series (with comparison group), prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, (nested) case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. We searched for studies comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control with standard care. We excluded studies evaluating palliative interventions for symptoms caused by other terminal illnesses. If studies enrolled populations with or exposed to multiple diseases, we would only include these if the authors provided subgroup data for individuals with COVID-19. We excluded studies investigating interventions for symptom control in a curative setting, for example patients receiving life-prolonging therapies such as invasive ventilation.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) to assess bias in the included studies. We included the following outcomes: symptom relief (primary outcome); quality of life; symptom burden; satisfaction of patients, caregivers, and relatives; serious adverse events; and grade 3 to 4 adverse events. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.  As meta-analysis was not possible, we used tabulation to synthesize the studies and histograms to display the outcomes.  MAIN RESULTS: Overall, we identified four uncontrolled retrospective cohort studies investigating pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control in hospitalized patients and patients in nursing homes. None of the studies included a comparator. We rated the risk of bias high across all studies. We rated the certainty of the evidence as very low for the primary outcome symptom relief, downgrading mainly for high risk of bias due to confounding and unblinded outcome assessors. Pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control We identified four uncontrolled retrospective cohort studies (five references) investigating pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control. Two references used the same register to form their cohorts, and study investigators confirmed a partial overlap of participants. We therefore do not know the exact number of participants, but individual reports included 61 to 2105 participants. Participants received multimodal pharmacological interventions: opioids, neuroleptics, anticholinergics, and benzodiazepines for relieving dyspnea (breathlessness), delirium, anxiety, pain, audible upper airway secretions, respiratory secretions, nausea, cough, and unspecified symptoms.  Primary outcome: symptom relief All identified studies reported this outcome. For all symptoms (dyspnea, delirium, anxiety, pain, audible upper airway secretions, respiratory secretions, nausea, cough, and unspecified symptoms), a majority of interventions were rated as completely or partially effective by outcome assessors (treating clinicians or nursing staff). Interventions used in the studies were opioids, neuroleptics, anticholinergics, and benzodiazepines.  We are very uncertain about the effect of pharmacological interventions on symptom relief (very low-certainty evidence). The initial rating of the certainty of evidence was low since we only identified uncontrolled NRSIs. Our main reason for downgrading the certainty of evidence was high risk of bias due to confounding and unblinded outcome assessors. We therefore did not find evidence to confidently support or refute whether pharmacological interventions may be effective for palliative symptom relief in COVID-19 patients. Secondary outcomes We planned to include the following outcomes: quality of life; symptom burden; satisfaction of patients, caregivers, and relatives; serious adverse events; and grade 3 to 4 adverse events. We did not find any data for these outcomes, or any other information on the efficacy and safety of used interventions. Non-pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control None of the identified studies used non-pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found very low certainty evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom relief in COVID-19 patients. We found no evidence on the safety of pharmacological interventions or efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients. The evidence presented here has no specific implications for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients because we cannot draw any conclusions about the effectiveness or safety based on the identified evidence. More evidence is needed to guide clinicians, nursing staff, and caregivers when treating symptoms of COVID-19 patients at the end of life. Specifically, future studies ought to investigate palliative symptom control in prospectively registered studies, using an active-controlled setting, assess patient-reported outcomes, and clearly define interventions. The publication of the results of ongoing studies will necessitate an update of this review. The conclusions of an updated review could differ from those of the present review and may allow for a better judgement regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients.

Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials for multiple myeloma: Where we are

e18615

Background: It is recommended to include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer trials to ensure clinical benefit based on patients’ perceptions. For multiple myeloma patients, PRO measurement is essential to understand the impact of treatment on their physical and psychosocial functional behaviour. However, it is unclear which PRO instruments are utilized in multiple myeloma trials, how often they are used and whether results are consistently reported. The aim of this project was to explore the use and frequency of PRO instruments in randomized controlled trials for multiple myeloma and to assess the consistency of their reporting. Methods: Within the European Hematology Association (EHA) project to develop guidelines for the use of PROs in adult patients with hematological malignancies, MEDLINE and CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating multiple myeloma between 2015 and 2020. Study design, disease and treatment characteristics, the primary outcome and used PRO instrument(s) were extracted using a pre-defined template. To assess the consistency of PRO reporting, study registries were compared with publications, study protocol and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) reports where available. Results: Overall, 10,707 records were found. Following screening for randomized-controlled trials, 283 ongoing, completed or published studies were included for review. 118 studies planned the use of PROs. The most frequently used PRO instrument (92 studies) was the EORTC QLQ-30, an instrument that measures health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in cancer patients. The disease-specific questionnaire EORTC-MY20 was also frequently used (50 studies). Likewise, the HRQoL instrument EQ-5D was used in 50 studies. Overall, 38 different PRO instruments were reported. In 39 studies for which a study protocol was found, only 19 reported PRO instruments consistently with the trial registry for the study. In addition, in 30 studies, for which a publication reported PRO results (58 overall), the information on PRO instruments differed between publication and the trial registry. For example, PRO instruments mentioned in the registry were omitted in the respective publications. Additionally, information on PRO in HTA reports was available for 26 studies, of which 18 reports were consistent with the trial registries. Conclusions: The results show that measurement of PROs still remain under-utilized in multiple myeloma research. While most PRO instruments identified in this review comply with the recommendations for incorporating PROs into clinical research in adult oncology, they are often inconsistently reported. Thus, reporting standards for the use of PROs are needed to ensure consistency in the use and reporting of PROs.

Right ventricular function and outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background. Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) on echocardiography has been shown to predict outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, a comparison with the gold standard, RV ejection fraction (EF) on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), has never been performed.

Objectives. To compare RV function parameters on echocardiography and CMR for prognostication in TAVI patients.

Methods. Consecutive patients scheduled for TAVI underwent echocardiography and CMR.  RV fractional area change (FAC), TAPSE, RV free-lateral-wall tissue Doppler (S’) and strain were assessed on echocardiography, and RVEF on CMR. Patients were prospectively followed. Adjusted regression analyses were used to report the strength of association per 1-SD decline for each RV function parameter with 1) NT-proBNP levels, 2) prolonged in-hospital stay (>14 days), and 3) a composite of heart failure hospitalization and death.

Results. 204 patients (80.9 ± 6.6y/o; 51% female; EuroSCORE-II: 6.5 ± 5.5%) were included. At a cross-sectional level, all RV function parameters were associated with NT-proBNP levels, but only FAC and RVEF were significantly associated with a prolonged in-hospital stay (adj. OR 1.98 [95%CI: 1.15-3.41], p = 0.013 and 2.29 [95%CI: 1.43-3.67], p = 0.001, respectively). A total of 56 events occurred during follow-up (mean 13.7 ± 9.5months). After adjustment for the EuroSCORE-II and NT-proBNP levels, only RVEF was significantly associated with the composite endpoint (adj. HR 1.69 [95%CI: 1.24-2.30], p < 0.001, Figure 1).

Conclusions. RVD as defined by echocardiography is associated with an advanced disease state, but fails to predict outcomes after adjustment for pre-existing clinical risk factors in TAVI patients. In contrast, RVEF on CMR is independently associated with heart failure hospitalization and death.

Abstract Figure 1. Outcome analysis

Right ventricular rather than left ventricular systolic dysfunction predicts outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Right ventricular (RV) function is strongly associated with outcome in heart failure. Whether it also adds important prognostic information in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown.

Methods

We consecutively enrolled patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) scheduled for TAVI and preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with outcome. A composite of heart failure hospitalization and/or cardiovascular death was selected as primary study endpoint.

Results

423 consecutive patients (80.7±7.3 years; 48% female) were prospectively included, 201 (48%) underwent CMR imaging. 55 (27%) patients presented with RV systolic dysfunction (RVSD) defined by RV ejection fraction (RVEF) <45%. RVSD was associated with male sex (69 vs. 40%; p<0.001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status (NYHA ≥ III: 89 vs. 57%; p<0.001), NT-proBNP serum levels (9365 vs. 2715 pg/mL; p<0.001), and history of atrial fibrillation (AF: 51 vs. 30%; p=0.005). On CMR, RVSD was associated with left ventricular (LV) volumes (end-diastolic: 187 vs. 137 mL, end-systolic: 119 vs. 53 mL; p<0.001) and EF (39 vs. 64%; p<0.001).

A total of 51 events (37 deaths, 14 hospitalizations for heart failure) occurred during follow-up (9.8±9 months). While LVSD (LVEF <50%) was not significantly associated with outcome (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.33 – 2.11; p=0.694), RVSD showed a strong and independent association with event-free survival by multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.07–5.73; p=0.035), which was adjusted for all relevant CMR parameters (LV volumes and EF), cardiovascular risk factors (sex, NYHA, AF, diabetes mellitus type II, use of diuretics), and routine biomarkers (NT-proBNP, creatinine).

Conclusions

RVSD rather than LVSD, as determined on CMR, is an important predictor of outcome in patients undergoing TAVI. RV function might thus add useful prognostic information on top of established risk factors.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Save your brain – does the sentinel cerebral protection device work?

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly used for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), also in low-risk patients. Periprocedural embolic stroke is rare, but potentially associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Thus, there is great interest in preventing any cerebral embolic event. At present, only one cerebral embolic protection systems (CPS) is commercially available and little is known about its efficacy in preventing stroke during TAVI. The Sentinel CPS is a FDA-approved system consisting of two inter-connected filters that are placed in the brachiocephalic trunk and the left carotid artery via the right radial artery.

Material and methods

Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI between 11/2018 and 11/2019 were enrolled. Consecutive patients treated by one operator received the Sentinel device, if anatomically possible. Periprocedural stroke rate, as defined by VARC2-criteria, and mortality up to 7 days after procedure was assessed. Descriptive statistics was performed to identify baseline variables associated with elevated risk of stroke and Cox-regression analysis was used to investigate its influence on outcome.

Results

268 patients (47.4% female, 81±7 years) were included. In 74 patients (27.6%), a Sentinel CPS was used, in 63 (23.5%) it was positioned correctly in the brachiocephalic trunk and left carotid artery. Only these patients were considered Sentinel-protected. Patients with and without Sentinel presented with similar baseline characteristics with regard to age (no CPS vs CPS; 80.3 vs 81.5 years; p=0.233), sex (female 47.3% vs 47.7%; p=0.967), previous stroke (6.9% vs 3.2%; p=0.373), peripheral artery disease (9.8% vs 4.8%; p=0.305), coronary artery disease (63.1% vs 57.1%; p=0.370), and kidney function (GFR 52 vs 56 ml/min/m2; p=0.283). The EuroScore II (6% vs 6%; p=0.937), periprocedural predilation (48.3% vs 47.6; p=0.925), postdilation (29.3% vs 31.7%; p=0.707) and procedure time (59min vs 66min; p=0.152) were not different. In total, 15 strokes (5.6%) occurred, of which 9 (3.3%) were disabling strokes as defined by the VARC2-criteria. In Sentinel-protected patients undergoing TAVI, no periprocedural stroke was observed (no CPS 7.3% vs 0.0%; p=0.026).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that Sentinel CPS significantly reduces periprocedural stroke rates in patients undergoing TAVI compared to patients without CPS. However, the study population is small and randomized trials are still needed.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Acute hemodynamic effects of iatrogenic inter-atrial shunts after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Background

Implantable interatrial shunt devices improve pulmonary vascular function in patients with heart failure by transferring richly oxygenated blood to the right heart. Whether iatrogenic atrial septum defects (iASDs) after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (pMVR) are also associated with beneficial hemodynamic effects has not been investigated.

Methods

We consecutively enrolled patients with relevant functional (FMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) scheduled for pMVR. Invasive hemodynamic assessments were performed prior to and immediately after the procedure.

Results

97 consecutive patients (75.4±9.1 years; 58% female) were prospectively included, 65 (66%) presented with relevant FMR. At baseline when compared to the DMR group, FMR was associated with worse left ventricular (LV) function (LV ejection fraction: 39 vs. 49%; p=0.001), higher NT-proBNP levels (7404 vs. 5214 pg/mL; p=0.023), worse renal function (serum creatinine: 1.7 vs. 1.3 mg/dL; p=0.019), and higher usage of spironolactone (68 vs. 42%; p=0.018) and sacubitril/valsartan (33 vs. 0%; p<0.001).

Following pMVR, cardiac output (CO) and systemic blood flow (Qs) increased significantly (CO: 4.6 to 5.5 L/min; p<0.001; Qs: 4.9 to 5.8 L/min; p=0.002), with more pronounced changes in the FMR subgroup (ΔCO: 1.0 vs. 0.6 L/min; Figure 1A; ΔQs: 1.2 vs. 0.1 L/min), when compared to DMR. Pulmonary blood flow (Qp) increased by 26% (4.3 to 5.4 L/min; p=0.008), accompanied by a raise in pulmonary artery (PA) oxygen (O2) saturation from 73 to 77% (p<0.001). Arterial O2 saturation levels remained unchanged (98.3 to 98.7%; p=0.165), confirming no significant changes in systemic oxygenation. These changes were associated with a slight decline in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR: 250 to 225 dynes*sec/cm5; p=0.369, Figure 1B), and a tendency towards improvement of pulmonary compliance (PAC: 3.6 to 4.0 mL/mmHg; p=0.414).

Conclusions

Invasively measured CO, Qs, Qp, and mixed-venous PA O2 saturation increased immediately after pMVR, alongside with potentially beneficial effects on pulmonary vasculature with marked improvements in PVR and PAC. These changes were more pronounced in the FMR subgroup. Further studies are required to assess long-term hemodynamic effects and underlying mechanisms of persistent iASDs on pulmonary vascular function.

Figure 1. Invasive hemodynamics

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Pacemaker lead-induced progression of primary vs. secondary tricuspid regurgitation

Background

Currently no data are available whether the implantation of right ventricular (RV) pacemaker (PM) lead worsens preexisting primary or secondary (functional due to RV dilatation, RVD) tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

Purpose

The aim of the present retrospective analysis was to assess TR after PM implantation with a RV lead.

Methods

Patients with PM implantation (n=990) were enrolled if they had routine echocardiography including assessment of TR before first implantation and immediately after. RVD and severity of TR were characterized visually. Based on RVD in baseline echocardiography, patients were divided into 2 groups: with primary TR (without preexisting RVD, n=743) or secondary TR (with preexisting RVD, n=243).

Results

Lead-induced worsening of TR was present in both groups (Table 1). Progression from mild/moderate to severe TR was observed in 6.7% of patients with primary TR, compared to 25.6% of patients with secondary TR (P=0.001). Using an ordinal regression model, the probability to progress to severe TR with primary TR was 14.8% (95% CI 11.0%-19.7%), compared to 41.6% (95% CI 40.3%-42.8%) with secondary TR (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Preexisting secondary TR was associated with higher rates of lead-induced progression to severe TR compared to primary TR. Leadless pacing or tricuspid valve clipping post-PM implantation could be an option for patients with preexisting secondary TR and indication for a PM.

Table 1. Patient characteristics.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): This study was supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Future and Emerging Technologies Programme [Grant number 732170].

Anticoagulation and outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis

Background

No strong recommendation exists regarding the use of short-term anticoagulation after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a biological prosthesis.

Purpose

Our aim was to analyze outcomes of patients receiving warfarin versus low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after isolated SAVR.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all adult patients who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2017 at our department (n=598). Exclusion criteria included pre-operative anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, dialysis, previous aortic valve replacement, or active endocarditis. Patients who were discharged alive were stratified according to the type of anticoagulation (warfarin, n=332, 55.5%; LMWH, n=266, 44.5%). Long-term survival during the follow-up period was analyzed (median follow-up, 5.6 years).

Results

Patients who received warfarin had significantly lower logistic EuroSCORE and were younger (Table 1). Warfarin was more frequently utilized between 2009 and 2014, whereas LMWH was more commonly used between 2015 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier curves in Figure 1 show that patients who received warfarin had significantly superior long-term survival (log-rank test: p=0.002). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed that the use of warfarin was associated with significantly lower risk of long-term mortality when compared with LMWH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.74, p=0.001). Covariables in this model included logistic EuroSCORE, era, and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Conclusions

The present analysis suggests that the use of warfarin is associated with significantly superior survival after SAVR with a biological prosthesis. Our findings require validation in a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

P1763 Impact of disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation

Background

Application of the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (RegVol) is potentially limited as such lesion-focused metrics inevitably lack flexibility to account for the heterogeneity of left ventricular size and function. A recently proposed conceptual framework seeks to rearrange EROA and RegVol cut-offs according to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), introducing the novel term "disproportionate FMR" to describe clinically meaningful FMR.

Methods

To test the impact of disproportionate FMR, we embedded data of 291 heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) under guideline directed therapy (GDT) into this framework. Regurgitant Volume and EROA were plotted against LVEDV using bubble plots that also account for the heterogeneity of EF (Figure 1 A and C). The black lines depict a regurgitant fraction (RegFrac) of 50% at the median EF (25%) or Vmax (4.3m/s) of the study population. Thus, above individual center lines (illustrated by different bubble sizes) FMR severity is disproportionate, within the area of measurement uncertainty it is proportionate to LV dilation and below, it is likely non-severe. The degree of uncertainty of proportionate FMR is determined by the imprecision of the measurements defined as 2SDs of regurgitant fraction (±6.6%) per Bland-Altmann analysis.

Results

During a median follow-up of 84 months (IQR 84-136), 166 patients died. Disproportionate FMR was associated with excess mortality (RegVol: HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.38-2.81, P < 0.001; EROA: HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.52-3.22), whereas proportionate FMR was not associated with increased long-term mortality (RegVol: HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.71-1.53, P = 0.83; EROA: HR 1.06, 95%CI 0.71-1.58, P = 0.79; Figure 1B&D).

Conclusions

In this contemporary HFrEF cohort every fifth patient has disproportionate FMR which conveys a two-fold increased risk of mortality which provides evidence for the validity of the conceptual framework. Advancement of the proposed framework to clinical practice has several implications: 1)EROA and RegVol are metrics that do not account for the contextual variability of LVEDV and EF. 2)The RegFrac -not incorporated in ESC guidelines but integrated in AHA/ACC definitions- provides a metric proportionated to left ventricular size and function supporting its use to define relevant FMR. However, technical limits suggest its complementary use on top of more robust metrics such as EROA and RegVol. Future studies need to clarify whether disproportionate FMR reflects the subgroup of patients that benefit from mitral valve repair, and provide a robust algorithm that integrates the metrics of FMR severity in a complementary manner.

Abstract P1763 Figure.

State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing : A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology

Background

Cardiac pacing has been shown to improve quality of life and prognosis of patients with bradycardia for almost 60 years. The latest innovation in pacemaker therapy was miniaturization of generators to allow leadless pacing directly in the right ventricle. There is a long history and extensive experience of leadless ventricular pacing in Austria. However, no recommendations of national or international societies for indications and implantation of leadless opposed to transvenous pacing systems have been published so far.

Results

A national expert panel of skilled implanters gives an overview on the two utilized leadless cardiac pacing systems and highlights clinical advantages as well as current knowledge of performance and complication rates of leadless pacing. Furthermore, a national consensus for Austria is presented, based on recent studies and current know-how, specifically including indications for leadless pacing, management of infection, suggestions for qualification, and training of the operators and technical standards.

Conclusions

Leadless pacing systems can be implanted successfully with a low complication rate, if suggestions for indications and technical requirements are followed.

Condensed abstract

An overview of the two utilized leadless cardiac pacing systems is given, specifically highlighting clinical advantages as well as current knowledge of performance and complication rates. Furthermore, a national consensus for Austria is presented, specifically including indications for leadless pacing, management of infection, and suggestions for qualification and technical standards.

P4720Mitraclip XTR device used for the treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation provides significant reduction of annular size

Background

Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is a progressive disease strongly associated with increased cardiac and all-cause mortality. The transcatheter approach to this pathology has been recently described with promising results in the treatment of symptomatic patients despite optimal medical therapy. Development of annular dilation and leaflet tethering represent a continuous pattern in the pathophysiology of functional TR; for this reason, to reduce and stabilize the annulus is the goal of an efficacious therapy.

Purpose

In order to simplify leaflet grasping, the novel MitraClip XTRdevice has significantly longer clip arms compared to its predecessor. The increased grasping length could be able to apply a radial tension on the tricuspid annulus, reducing it in dimensions. Despite, the increased tension on the leaflets may theoretically impose a higher risk for leaflet tearing We analyzed our single-center experience in order to clarify the capability of the device in the feature of annular reshapement.

Methods

Five high-risk patients (4 females, 72 (quartiles 69–79) y.o., EuroSCORE II 10 (7.25–11.2)% affected by severe symptomatic functional TR were treated with MitraClip XTR implantation in tricuspid position. Right ventricular function was apparently preserved in all cases and the mean sPAP was 41 (quartiles 38–45) mmHg. Perioperative echo-results were collected prospectively and analyzed.

Results

Procedural success (defined as a reduction of more than 1 degree of TR) was achieved in 4 cases (80%). 3±1 devices were implanted per patient in the antero-septal commissure. The tricuspid annular diameter (measured in four chamber view) was reduced from 39 (quartiles 39–41) mm to 31 (quartiles 30–31) mm (p=0.043). Accordingly, the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) decreased from 110 (quartiles 70 to 160) mm2 to 45 (quartiles 9–55) mm2 (p=0.02) and the systolic VTI in the hepatic veins decreased by 42%. No significant increase of trans-valvular mean gradients was observed (2.5 (quartiles 2.25 to 2.75)) mmHg vs 3.75 (quartiles 3,75 to 4) mmHg; p=0.2) as well no cases of acute leaflet tearing.

Conclusion

The reduction in tricuspid annulus size with the novel XTRdevice represents an unexpected and interesting achievement of the procedure. A significant reduction of annular dimensions might provide a more durable reduction of functional TR. Long-term follow-up data will be required to clarify these initial results and as well as patient selection criteria.

P1840Mid-term results of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve: A word of caution

Background

Structural valve deterioration (SVD) with associated bioprosthetic valve dysfunction remains an unsolved problem, exposing patients to the risk of aortic valve re-intervention after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Several strategies have been proposed to improve prosthesis design for optimal performance. The leaflets of the Trifecta valve are mounted on the outside of the prosthetic stent to achieve a larger orifice area. Although favourable early clinical outcomes have been reported, long-term durability still needs to be assessed.

Purpose

The aim of the current study was to assess the mid-term overall mortality and re-intervention rate in patients who received a Trifecta valve with a follow-up >5 years.

Methods

Patients who underwent SAVR at our centre between 2011 and 2012 were identified in the internal, prospective database. All patients with implantation of a Trifecta valve in aortic position were included. Primary endpoints were freedom from overall mortality and from re-operation at latest follow-up (FU). Additionally, assessment of echocardiographic parameters at baseline and follow-up was performed.

Results

Seventy-six patients (age 77.3±9.5 years, BMI 28.6±5.8, 68% male) were included in the study. EuroScore II was 7.2% (± 7.7) while mean STS-Mortality score was 2.4±1.1%. Of all procedures, 53% were isolated aortic valve replacements, whereas concomitant procedures were performed in 47% of cases (37% CABG, 12% mitral surgery, 8% tricuspid surgery). Baseline echocardiographic assessment showed a mean pressure gradient (MPG) of 51±21 mmHG, a peak pressure gradient (PPG) of 78±36 mmHG and a peak velocity (Vmax) of 4.2±1.1 m/s.

Thirty-day mortality was 7%. Freedom from overall mortality at 1 year and 5 years was 84% and 73%, respectively. Freedom from death and freedom from re-operation at latest FU (6.7±0.5 years) was 68% and 90%, respectively. In a composite endpoint analysis, freedom from death or re-intervention at latest follow up was 60%. A total of 7 patients underwent aortic valve re-interventions (re-replacements n=5, valve-in-valve n=2). Indications for re-interventions were SVD (n=5), NSVD (n=1, pannus ingrowth) and endocarditis (n=1). One case of re-stenosis occurred in a patient who was deemed not feasible for aortic valve re-intervention and died.

Kaplan Meier analysis

Conclusion(s)

To our knowledge, this patient cohort presents with the lowest rate of freedom from re-operation (90%, 6.7±0.5 years) after SAVR with the Trifecta valve. A relatively high number of SVD and NSVD has been observed, which might be attributable to the specific leaflet mounting or the deformable valve frame of the first generation. Current results call for further investigation with prospective echocardiographic follow-up in this patient group.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

P5573Disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation: advancing a conceptual framework from bench to bedside

Introduction

A recently proposed conceptual framework seeks to rearrange the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (RegVol) cut-offs according to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in functional mitral regurgitation introducing “disproportionate FMR” to describe clinically meaningful FMR. The conceptual framework, however, remains hypothetical.

Purpose

To test the significance of disproportionate FMR.

Methods

Data of 291 heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) under guideline directed therapy were embedded into this conceptual framework (Figure 1A). The black line represents the relationship when the degree of FMR is proportionate to LVEDV with a regurgitant fraction of (RegFrac) of 50%. The dashed lines represent the degree of uncertainty determined by the imprecision inherent to the measurement of RegFrac defined as 2SD for inter- and intraobserver variability by Bland-Altmann analysis (equals ±6.6%). Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were applied to assess the association between FMR proportionality and mortality.

Results

Median age was 68 years (IQR 61–75), 77% were male. Median LVEF was 25% (IQR 18–33) and LVEDV was 214ml (IQR 165–267). Disproportionate FMR was present in 71 patients (24%) (red dots Figure 1A) with a median EROA of 0.26cm2 (IQR 0.18–0.34) and a median RegVol of 42ml (IQR 28–52), proportionate FMR (yellow dots Figure 1 A) in 81 patients (28%) with a median EROA of 0.12cm2 (IQR 0.09–0.17) and a median RegVol of 18ml (IQR 14–27). During 7-years follow-up, 166 patients died. Disproportionate FMR was associated with excess mortality compared to patients with non-severe FMR (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04–0.71, P<0.001), whereas proportionate FMR was not associated with increased long-term mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI −1.53–0.71, P=0.83, Figure 1B).

Figure 1. Panel A and B

Conclusion

Every fifth patient suffers from disproportionate FMR which conveys a two-fold increased risk of mortality. Disproprtionate FMR corresponds to an EROA of roughly 0.3cm2 and a RegVol of 45ml – the unifying intersection between ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines to define severe FMR. The RegFrac provides a measure proportionated to left ventricular size and function supporting its use to define clinically relevant FMR. However, RegFrac is subject to compound error due to imputation of multiple measurements limiting its use as the leading contender for FMR grading. Regardless of the term used to describe clinically significant FMR, the conceptual framework emphasizes the unmet clinical need for recalibrated cut-offs for FMR severity condensed to an algorithm that combines the strengths of several measurements of FMR severity in an integrated manner.

P4128The right heart in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides the gold standard for the assessment of ventricular volumes and mass. However, data on right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD) and its prognostic significance on outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are lacking.

Methods

We consecutively enrolled patients with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVR who underwent preprocedural CMR. Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with outcome, including RVSD. A composite of heart failure hospitalization and/or cardiovascular death was selected as primary study endpoint.

Results

145 consecutive patients (80.5±7.6 years; 51.7% female) were prospectively included, 25 (17.2%) of which had RVSD defined as RV ejection fraction (RVEF) <40%. RVSD was significantly associated with male sex, atrial fibrillation, reduced left ventricular (LV) EF (<50%) and RV endsystolic volume on CMR (all p<0.05). Serum NT-proBNP (14065±12042 vs. 3203±4615 ng/ml; p<0.001) and creatinine levels (1.59±0.96 vs. 1.29±1.03 mg/dl; p=0.201) were elevated in patients with RVSD. A total of 27 events occurred during follow-up (29±13 weeks). While LVSD was not significantly associated with outcome (p=0.654), RVSD showed a strong and independent association with event-free survival in the multivariate Cox-regression analysis [hazard ratio 3.836 (95% confidence interval 1.670–8.810); p=0.002], which included all relevant CMR parameters, cardiovascular risk factors and routine biomarkers.

Conclusions

RVSD rather than LVSD, as determined by CMR, is an important predictor of outcome in patients undergoing TAVR. RV function might thus add useful prognostic information on top of established risk factors.

Early Clinical Experience with Double Ring Implantation for Aortic and Mitral Valve Repair

Reconstruction of cardiac valves is associated with reduced mortality, including in multiple valve surgery. However, multiple valve repair is still considered a challenge, even with established techniques. Recently, internal aortic ring annuloplasty has been introduced and could simplify multiple valve reconstruction. This study reports early results with double ring aortic and mitral valve repair. Three patients with bivalvular degenerative regurgitation were managed with combined aortic and mitral valve repair using double rings. Mean (±SD) age was 41 ± 21 years, preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 119 ± 53 mL/m², and ejection fraction was 0.50 ± 0.07. Mean aortic ring diameter was 21 mm, and mitral rings averaged 32 mm. No operative mortalities or major complications were observed. No valve-related events occurred. Postoperative echo showed complete resolution of mitral and aortic regurgitation. Postoperative left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased to 98 ± 10 mL/m²; no left ventricular outflow tract obstruction or significant transvalvular gradients were observed. Postoperative cardiac CTs showed an optimal three-dimensional configuration of aortic and mitral annuloplasty devices. This initial series demonstrated the feasibility and safety of combined aortic and mitral repair with double rings. Clinical and hemodynamic results were promising. Increasing application and more clinical experience with combined aortic and mitral double ring repair seems indicated.

A rare case of obstructive right atrial lipoma

Benign cardiac tumours are rare and cardiac lipomas account only for a small fraction among those. Most of these tumours differ in terms of clinical manifestation, diagnosis, morphology and size, and are therefore not diagnosed easily unless they become symptomatic. We report the case of a 71-year-old Caucasian woman with recurrent episodes of shortness of breath presenting with an acute exacerbation of dyspnoea and hypertensive crisis. Diagnosis of a right atrial lipoma with a coexisting patent foramen ovale was established on echocardiography and computed tomography, and the patient was evaluated for elective surgery. Comprising the entire free wall of the right atrium, the tumour was removed during open heart surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. The right atrium and the orifices of both the superior and inferior vena cava were reconstructed with bovine pericardium. No evidence of tumour relapse was observed during successive follow-up visits.