1
|
Dijkstra BM, Rood PJT, Teerenstra S, Rutten AMF, Leerentveld C, Burgers-Bonthuis DC, Festen-Spanjer B, Klarenbeek T, Van Den Boogaard M, Ewalds E, Schoonhoven L, Van Der Hoeven JG, Vloet LCM. Effect of a Standardized Family Participation Program in the ICU: A Multicenter Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:420-431. [PMID: 37934138 PMCID: PMC10876177 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of a standardized program for family participation in essential care activities in the ICU on symptoms of anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress and satisfaction among relatives, and perceptions and experiences of ICU healthcare providers (HCPs). DESIGN Multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING Seven adult ICUs, one university, and six general teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred six relatives and 235 ICU HCPs. INTERVENTIONS A standardized program to facilitate family participation inpatient communication, amusement/distraction, comfort, personal care, breathing, mobilization, and nutrition. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Data were collected through surveys among relatives and ICU HCPs. There were no significant differences in symptoms of anxiety in relatives in the intervention period compared with the control period (median Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] 5 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-10] vs 6 [IQR 3-9]; median ratio [MR] 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.13; p = 0.15), depression (median HADS 4 [IQR 2-6] vs 3 [IQR 1-6]; MR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.32; p = 0.47) or posttraumatic stress (median Impact of Event Scale-Revised score 0.45 [IQR 0.27-0.82] vs 0.41 [IQR 0.14-1]; MR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.14; p = 0.54). Reported satisfaction was slightly lower in the intervention period (mean 8.90 [ sd 1.10] vs mean 9.06 [ sd 1.10], difference -0.60; 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.12; p = 0.01). ICU HCPs perceived that more relatives knew how to participate: 47% in the intervention period versus 22% in the control period (odds ratio [OR] 3.15; 95% CI, 1.64-6.05; p < 0.01). They also reported relatives having sufficient knowledge (41% vs 16%; OR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.75-7.25; p < 0.01) and skills (44% vs 25%; OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.22-4.63; p = 0.01) to apply family participation. CONCLUSIONS Application of a standardized program to facilitate family participation did not change mental health symptoms in relatives of ICU patients 3 months after discharge. ICU HCPs reported increased clarity, knowledge, and skills among relatives and ICU HCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boukje M Dijkstra
- Research Department Emergency and Critical Care, School of Health Studies Nijmegen, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J T Rood
- Research Department Emergency and Critical Care, School of Health Studies Nijmegen, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven Teerenstra
- Department for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M F Rutten
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Crista Leerentveld
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, ISALA Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Toine Klarenbeek
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Van Den Boogaard
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Ewalds
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Lisette Schoonhoven
- Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lilian C M Vloet
- Research Department Emergency and Critical Care, School of Health Studies Nijmegen, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Foundation for Family and Patient Centered Intensive Care, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Oorsouw R, Klooster E, Koenders N, Van Der Wees PJ, Van Den Boogaard M, Oerlemans AJM. Longing for homelikeness: A hermeneutic phenomenological analysis of patients' lived experiences in recovery from COVID-19-associated intensive care unit acquired weakness. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78:3358-3370. [PMID: 35765746 PMCID: PMC9349706 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Aims To explore lived experiences of patients recovering from COVID‐19‐associated intensive care unit acquired weakness and to provide phenomenological descriptions of their recovery. Design A qualitative study following hermeneutic phenomenology. Methods Through purposeful sampling, 13 participants with COVID‐19‐associated intensive care unit acquired weakness were recruited with diversity in age, sex, duration of hospitalization and severity of muscle weakness. Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were conducted from 4 to 8 months after hospital discharge, between July 2020 and January 2021. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using hermeneutic phenomenological analysis. Results The analysis yielded five themes: ‘waking up in alienation’, ‘valuing human contact in isolation’, ‘making progress by being challenged’, ‘coming home but still recovering’ and ‘finding a new balance’. The phenomenological descriptions reflect a recovery process that does not follow a linear build‐up, but comes with moments of success, setbacks, trying new steps and breakthrough moments of achieving mobilizing milestones. Conclusion Recovery from COVID‐19‐associated intensive care unit acquired weakness starts from a situation of alienation. Patients long for familiarity, for security and for recognition. Patients want to return to the familiar situation, back to the old, balanced, bodily self. It seems possible for patients to feel homelike again, not only by changing their outer circumstances but also by changing the understanding of themselves and finding a new balance in the altered situation. Impact Muscle weakness impacts many different aspects of ICU recovery in critically ill patients with COVID‐19‐associated intensive care unit acquired weakness. Their narratives can help nurses and other healthcare professionals, both inside and outside of the intensive care unit, to empathize with patient experiences. When healthcare professionals connect to the lifeworld of patients, they will start to act and communicate differently. These insights could lead to optimized care delivery and meeting patients' needs in this pandemic or a possible next.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roel van Oorsouw
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Emily Klooster
- Deventer Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation, Deventer, The Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Niek Koenders
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Philip J Van Der Wees
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Van Den Boogaard
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anke J M Oerlemans
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|