The Use of Botulinum Toxin in Flap Surgery: A Review of the Literature

Botulinum neurotoxin-A and botulinum neurotoxin-B have been shown to play a potential role in improving flap survival in animal models. The aim of this study is to review indications as well as to study injection timing, technique, and doses of botulinum neurotoxin-A and botulinum neurotoxin-B in animal models. Seventeen articles describe a total of 266 animals that underwent botulinum toxin injections before or during flap harvesting or vascular anastomosis procedure. All the studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of botulinum toxin administration in flap surgery or vascular anastomosis. Botulinum neurotoxin-A injection was shown to be a reliable approach in reducing vascular complications rate and increasing survival of flaps in animal models. The main conclusions drawn from the study include the following: perivascular injections targeting each vascular pedicle are preferred in cases of free flaps or axial flaps; subdermal injections are favorable in cases of random pattern skin flaps; and injections should be performed 7 days before flap elevation.

Analysis of Symmetry Stability Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Contralateral Management in 582 Patients with Long-Term Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyse the long-term outcomes following breast reconstruction and contralateral management to evaluate the stability of breast symmetry and patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of women who had undergone implant-based monolateral breast reconstruction and contralateral management. Patients answered the BREAST-Q reconstruction module. Two reviewers analysed the post-operative outcomes of the patients included and compiled the Kroll Scale. Patients were divided into three groups: implant-based contralateral management, breast reduction and mastopexy. The Fisher's exact test was applied to the results.

RESULTS

From the BREAST-Q analysis, the group of patients undergoing contralateral breast augmentation achieved significantly better results regarding the ability to wear clothing (p ≪ 0.001), symmetry (p ≪ 0.001), psychosocial well-being (p ≪ 0.001) and physical well-being (p ≪ 0.001). From the analysis of the Kroll Scale, the group of implant-based contralateral management received the highest score for symmetry (p ≪ 0.001), shape (p ≪ 0.001) and aesthetic result overall (p ≪ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first to use BREAST-Q to analyse the stability of breast symmetry following breast reconstruction with long-term results. The implant-based contralateral management was the most effective procedure for achieving a stable and lasting result to obtain the high satisfaction of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Management of pancreatic cysts: a review of the current guidelines

The number of patients diagnosed with cystic pancreatic neoplasms (CPN) has increased significantly during the last decade due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. These CPN consist of a heterogeneous group of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions with variable histopathological features, clinical presentation, and outcome. Until now we are not able to reliably identify all CPNs that require additional analysis, surgical resection or surveillance. Hence, physicians and surgeons are confronted with a difficult dilemma as they do not want to miss a diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, but this often leads to the risk of over- or misuse of diagnostic examinations with a risk of complications and increased health care costs. Currently, four expert consensus guidelines on cystic lesions of the pancreas are available. Unfortunately, recommendations vary considerably between these guidelines. The purpose of this review therefore was to compare the different guidelines and elaborate upon the topics where these guidelines disagree.