1
|
Blum JL, DiCristo C, Gordon D, Karuturi MS, Oubre D, Jepsen E, Cuevas J, Lakhanpal S, Montelongo MZ, Zhang Z, Cappelleri JC, Wang Y, Tripathy D. Outcomes of male patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving palbociclib in the real-world POLARIS study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:463-475. [PMID: 37903899 PMCID: PMC10805882 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07145-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data on treatments for male breast cancer patients are limited owing to rarity and underrepresentation in clinical trials. The real-world POLARIS study gathers data on palbociclib use for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in female and male patients. This sub-analysis describes real-world palbociclib treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) in male patients. METHODS POLARIS is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter, real-world study of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC receiving palbociclib. Assessments included medical record reviews, patient QoL questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30), site characteristics questionnaires, and physician treatment selection surveys. Variables included demographics, disease history, global health status/QoL, clinical assessments and adverse events. Analyses were descriptive in nature. For clinical outcomes, real-world tumor responses and progression were determined by physician assessment in routine clinical practice. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS At data cutoff, 15 male patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years). Nine patients received palbociclib as a first-line treatment and 6 as a second-line or later treatment. Patients received a median of 20 cycles of palbociclib. Neutropenia was experienced by 2 patients and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 11 patients. Global health status/QoL scores remained generally consistent during the study. One patient (6.7%) achieved a complete tumor response, 4 (26.7%) a partial response, and 8 (53.3%) stable disease. Median rwPFS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 7.4-38.0). Median follow-up duration was 24.7 months (95% CI, 20.0-35.7). CONCLUSION This real-world analysis showed that palbociclib was well tolerated and provides preliminary data on treatment patterns and outcomes with palbociclib in male patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, helping inform the use of palbociclib in this patient subgroup. TRIAL IDENTIFIER NCT03280303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne L Blum
- Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | | | | | | | - David Oubre
- Ponchartrain Cancer Center, Hammond, LA, USA
| | - Erin Jepsen
- Novant Health Cancer Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Debu Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karuturi MS, Cappelleri JC, Blum JL, Patel K, Telivala B, McCune S, Cuevas JD, Lakhanpal S, Montelongo MZ, Wang Y, Tripathy D, Rocque GB. Measures of functional status in older patients treated with palbociclib for advanced breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101670. [PMID: 38061288 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Limited data are available on the effects of treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC) in older patients because this population has limited enrollment in clinical trials. Data generated from the prospective, noninterventional POLARIS study of patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC may help bridge the gap in our understanding of the tolerability and outcomes in this vulnerable population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated measures of geriatric impairments and activities of daily living in patients with ABC aged ≥70 years in POLARIS to evaluate the change within six months of palbociclib initiation. Geriatric impairments and activities of daily living (functional) status were assessed using the Geriatric 8 (G8) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) screening tools. The G8, ADL, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) scores were assessed at baseline and month six through end of treatment with palbociclib. ECOG PS scores were also stratified by G8 and ADL score severity subgroups (G8: ≤14 = impaired subgroup; >14 = not at all impaired subgroup; ADL: <18 = dependent subgroup, 18 = independent subgroup). RESULTS At data cutoff in November 2020, of 1282 POLARIS patients of all ages, 287 (22.4%) were ≥ 70 years old and completed ≥6 months of palbociclib therapy. At baseline, 117 (45%; n = 260) of these patients had an ECOG PS score of 0, 143 (55%; n = 260) had ECOG PS score > 0, 248 (86%) had G8 scores (mean [SD] 13.6 [2.14]), and 256 (89%) had ADL scores (17.7 [1.03]) among the available 287 patients. At six months, 102 (40%; n = 255) had an ECOG PS score of 0, 153 (60%; n = 255) had ECOG PS score > 0, 198 (69%) had G8 scores (13.6 [1.99]), and 211 (74%) had ADL scores (17.6 [1.22]) among the 287 available patients. There was no mean change (standard deviation) from baseline to 6 months in mean ECOG PS scores (0.0 [0.61], P = 0.24), G8 scores (0.0 [2.17], P = 0.89), or ADL scores (0.0 [1.00], P = 0.62). DISCUSSION In this subgroup analysis of older patients with ABC from POLARIS, functional status and impairment outcomes were preserved in older patients receiving palbociclib. G8, ADL, and ECOG PS scores were generally maintained during the first six months of palbociclib therapy. CLINICALTRIALS govidentification number. NCT03280303.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan S Karuturi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | | - Joanne L Blum
- Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Bijoy Telivala
- Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Steven McCune
- Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, Marietta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Debu Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haddad TC, Suman VJ, D'Assoro AB, Carter JM, Giridhar KV, McMenomy BP, Santo K, Mayer EL, Karuturi MS, Morikawa A, Marcom PK, Isaacs CJ, Oh SY, Clark AS, Mayer IA, Keyomarsi K, Hobday TJ, Peethambaram PP, O'Sullivan CC, Leon-Ferre RA, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Goetz MP. Evaluation of Alisertib Alone or Combined With Fulvestrant in Patients With Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancer: The Phase 2 TBCRC041 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:815-824. [PMID: 36892847 PMCID: PMC9999287 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Aurora A kinase (AURKA) activation, related in part to AURKA amplification and variants, is associated with downregulation of estrogen receptor (ER) α expression, endocrine resistance, and implicated in cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, upregulates ERα and restores endocrine sensitivity in preclinical metastatic breast cancer (MBC) models. The safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib was demonstrated in early-phase trials; however, its activity in CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC is unknown. Objective To assess the effect of adding fulvestrant to alisertib on objective tumor response rates (ORRs) in endocrine-resistant MBC. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted through the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium, which enrolled participants from July 2017 to November 2019. Postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative MBC who were previously treated with fulvestrant were eligible. Stratification factors included prior treatment with CDK 4/6i, baseline metastatic tumor ERα level measurement (<10%, ≥10%), and primary or secondary endocrine resistance. Among 114 preregistered patients, 96 (84.2%) registered and 91 (79.8%) were evaluable for the primary end point. Data analysis began after January 10, 2022. Interventions Alisertib, 50 mg, oral, daily on days 1 to 3, 8 to 10, and 15 to 17 of a 28-day cycle (arm 1) or alisertib same dose/schedule with standard-dose fulvestrant (arm 2). Main Outcomes and Measures Improvement in ORR in arm 2 of at least 20% greater than arm 1 when the expected ORR for arm 1 was 20%. Results All 91 evaluable patients (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [11.3] years; 1 American Indian/Alaskan Native [1.1%], 2 Asian [2.2%], 6 Black/African American [6.6%], 5 Hispanic [5.5%], and 79 [86.8%] White individuals; arm 1, 46 [50.5%]; arm 2, 45 [49.5%]) had received prior treatment with CDK 4/6i. The ORR was 19.6%; (90% CI, 10.6%-31.7%) for arm 1 and 20.0% (90% CI, 10.9%-32.3%) for arm 2. In arm 1, the 24-week clinical benefit rate and median progression-free survival time were 41.3% (90% CI, 29.0%-54.5%) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-10.0), respectively, and in arm 2 they were 28.9% (90% CI, 18.0%-42.0%) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.8), respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events attributed to alisertib were neutropenia (41.8%) and anemia (13.2%). Reasons for discontinuing treatment were disease progression (arm 1, 38 [82.6%]; arm 2, 31 [68.9%]) and toxic effects or refusal (arm 1, 5 [10.9%]; arm 2, 12 [26.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that adding fulvestrant to treatment with alisertib did not increase ORR or PFS; however, promising clinical activity was observed with alisertib monotherapy among patients with endocrine-resistant and CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC. The overall safety profile was tolerable. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02860000.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tufia C Haddad
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Vera J Suman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Jodi M Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Katelyn Santo
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Erica L Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Aki Morikawa
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - P Kelly Marcom
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sun Young Oh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Amy S Clark
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Khandan Keyomarsi
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | - Minetta C Liu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - James N Ingle
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tripathy D, Blum JL, Deng S, McCune SL, Patel K, Wang Y, Lakhanpal S, Karuturi MS, Zhang Z, Deshpande C, Montelongo MZ, Gauthier E, Liu Y, Rocque GB, Bardia A. Abstract P5-02-22: Circulating Tumor DNA Genotyping of Intrinsic and Acquired Gene Alterations in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Receiving the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib: Biomarker Results from POLARIS. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p5-02-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: POLARIS is a prospective, real-world study of palbociclib in patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the United States and Canada. We present results from analyses of serial circulating tumor gene alteration profiles from patients treated with palbociclib in the first and second or later lines of ABC treatment to illustrate the potential mutagenic drivers of resistance (intrinsic/acquired) and carrier-mutations (intrinsic/maintained). Methods: The clinical database cutoff date was March 30, 2022. Patients in the biomarker analysis group provided consent for serial blood sample collection, received ≥1 dose of initial palbociclib combination treatment, and had ≥1 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measurement available. The Guardant360 platform with somatic single-nucleotide variants in complete or critical exons of 73 genes was used. Tumor gene alteration profiles (at baseline, on-treatment at Cycle 2 Day 1 [C2D1], and at end of treatment [EOT]) were evaluated. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs. Results: Patient samples (n=345) were analyzed and gene alterations were detected in 85% of baseline samples (n=337), 72% of on-treatment samples (n=280), and 85% of EOT samples (n=104). Most frequently altered genes were PIK3CA (38%), TP53 (28%), and ESR1 (15%) at baseline; TP53 (28%), PIK3CA (24%), and NF1 (10%) at C2D1; and TP53 (40%), PIK3CA (40%), and ESR1 (33%) at EOT. Most frequent gene amplifications (amp) were detected in CCND1 (8.3%), FGFR1 (7.7%), and EGFR (5.9%) at baseline; FGFR1 (5.0%), CCND1 (4.3%), and EGFR (3.2%) at C2D1; and CCND1 (13.5%), FGFR1 (9.6%), and EGFR (9.6%) at EOT. Baseline mutations of ESR1 and PIK3CA led to shorter real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) than wild-type (hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.99 [1.38, 2.86] and 1.67 [1.24, 2.25], respectively). Baseline amp of CCND1 and FGFR1 also led to shorter rwPFS than wild-type (2.13 [1.36, 3.34] and 1.93 [1.20, 3.10]). Acquired mutations in ESR1, ATM, and RB1 were observed at EOT. Most frequently acquired ESR1 mutations at EOT were D538G, Y537N, and Y537S. Patients with all mutations cleared at C2D1, had longer rwPFS than those without (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.58 [0.41, 0.83]). Conclusion: Patients with mutated ESR1 and PIK3CA or CCND1 and FGFR1 amp at baseline had shorter rwPFS than patients with wild-type genes. Genotyping analysis of progression ctDNA highlights the emergence of mutations in estrogen receptor and cell cycle pathways under selective therapeutic pressure and could guide monitoring and therapeutic sequencing for patients with HR+/HER2– MBC. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03280303
Citation Format: Debu Tripathy, Joanne L. Blum, Shibing Deng, Steven L. McCune, Kamal Patel, Yao Wang, Shailendra Lakhanpal, Meghan S. Karuturi, Zhe Zhang, Chetan Deshpande, Monica Z. Montelongo, Eric Gauthier, Yuan Liu, Gabrielle B. Rocque, Aditya Bardia. Circulating Tumor DNA Genotyping of Intrinsic and Acquired Gene Alterations in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Receiving the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib: Biomarker Results from POLARIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debu Tripathy
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, Houston, Texas
| | - Joanne L. Blum
- 2Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, Dallas, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Yao Wang
- 6Pfizer Inc., New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuan Liu
- 13Pfizer Inc, San Diego, California
| | | | - Aditya Bardia
- 15Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Damodaran S, Liu D, Schwartz J, Valero V, Ramirez D, Saleem S, Ueno NT, Ibrahim NK, Karuturi MS, Murthy RK, Moulder S, Litton JK. Abstract P3-02-03: A phase Ib trial of bintrafusp alfa and eribulin in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p3-02-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Metastatic TNBC is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with poor prognosis and limited systemic therapy options. While pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy is approved for PD-L1 positive TNBC, limited immunotherapy options exist for patients with progressive and/or PD-L1 negative disease. TGFβ released by cancer cells and stromal fibroblasts attenuates the intrinsic antitumor potential of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment mediating resistance to immunotherapy. Consequently, inhibition of TGFβ signaling could potentially enhance antitumor responses to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 therapies. Bintrafusp alfa is a bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-β receptor II (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed cell death ligand 1. Preclinical studies have shown that eribulin downregulates TGFβ by phosphorylation of Smad proteins. Therefore, combining eribulin with bintrafusp alfa may have a synergistic effect. This study evaluated the combination of bintrafusp alfa with eribulin in patients with metastatic TNBC. Methods: This is a phase 1b, open label, single center study evaluating bintrafusp alfa in combination with eribulin in patients with metastatic TNBC who had relapsed/progressed on prior therapies. Patients with ER/PR ≤10% with measurable disease were enrolled. Patients who received prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in the metastatic setting were excluded. Patients received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks in combination with eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 (dose level 1), 1.1 mg/m2, or 0.7 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 22, 29 on every 6-week cycle. Primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) as well as to evaluate the safety and tolerability of eribulin in combination with the fixed dose of bintrafusp alfa. Secondary objective was to determine the overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1. Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design was employed to identify the RP2D. Toxicities assessed using CTCAE v4.03. Tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks. Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled on the study. Twenty-one patients were evaluable (3 screen failures, 1 received only one dose of study treatment). Median age 59 (range 27-85). Median number of prior therapies 2 (range 0-8). The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 15, 71%). Four patients experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs); 3 with decreased neutrophil count and 1 with increased aspartate aminotransferase. Five patients (24%) experienced grade 4 toxicities (increased aspartate aminotransferase, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, neutropenia). Nine patients (43%) experienced grade 3 toxicities. Three patients (14%) discontinued study due to toxicity. Total of 2 deaths were observed, none related to treatment. Most common toxicities (any grade) include anemia (n = 13 patients), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (11), neutropenia (n = 10), elevated aminotransferase (9), headache (n = 9), hypokalemia (n = 8), hyperglycemia (n = 8), leukopenia (n = 8), and fatigue (n = 8). RP2D was eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 with bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg. Six patients had PR (28.6%), 2 had SD (9.5%) and 12 had PD (57.1%) as the best response. One patient withdrew before response evaluation. Median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI: (1.2, 5.9) and median OS was 11.1 months (95%CI: (5.2, 15.7). Conclusions: The combination of bintrafusp alfa with eribulin has manageable safety profile with meaningful clinical activity in patients with TNBC. Further studies evaluating TGF inhibitors in breast cancer are warranted.
Citation Format: Senthil Damodaran, Diane Liu, Jill Schwartz, Vicente Valero, David Ramirez, Sadia Saleem, Naoto T. Ueno, Nuhad K. Ibrahim, Meghan S. Karuturi, Rashmi K. Murthy, Stacy Moulder, Jennifer K. Litton. A phase Ib trial of bintrafusp alfa and eribulin in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-02-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Vicente Valero
- 4Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Naoto T. Ueno
- 7The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Rashmi K. Murthy
- 10The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yam C, Li Z, Korkut A, Ma W, Kong E, Hill HA, Abbas H, Abouharb S, Adrada B, Arun BK, Barcenas CH, Bisen A, Booser D, Buzdar A, Candelaria R, Chen J, Clayborn A, Damodaran S, Ding Q, Garber H, Hortobagyi GN, Hunt KK, Ibrahim NK, Iheme A, Karuturi MS, Koenig K, Layman RM, Lee J, Litton JK, Mitchell M, Moscol G, Mouabbi J, Murthy RK, Oke O, Pohlmann P, Ramirez D, Ravenberg E, Saleem S, Teshome M, Valero V, White J, Williams M, Woodward W, Yajima C, Ueno NT, Chen K, Rauch G, Huo L, Tripathy D. Abstract HER2-01: HER2-01 Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of HER2-low/zero Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-her2-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In the metastatic setting, low HER2 expression is associated with clinical benefit from trastuzumab deruxtecan, a HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugates. However, little is known about the biological significance of low HER2 expression in patients with early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Methods: Out of 595 patients with stage I-III TNBC enrolled on the prospective ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443) from 2015-2021, we identified 367 patients with available HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results on pre-NAT tumor tissue (HER2-zero: n=218; HER2-low [IHC 1+, 2+]: n=149). All patients were treated with anthracycline-based NAT. In cases where sufficient pre-NAT tumor tissue were available, additional IHC and/or RNAseq were performed. Differential gene expression (DGE) and pathway analysis were performed using DEseq2. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using the Hallmark gene sets. Deconvolution analyses were performed using CIBERSORT. We controlled for multiple hypothesis using a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold with the Benjamini-Hochberg method, accepting as significant genes with at least a 2-fold change and < 5% FDR. Results: Table 1 summarizes baseline clinicopathological features of the 367 patients. Compared to HER2-zero tumors, HER2-low tumors were less likely of metaplastic histology (p=0.001), associated with lower Ki67 (p=0.017) and were more likely to be androgen receptor (AR)-positive (p=0.01). There were no significant differences in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) infiltration and PD-L1 expression between HER2-zero and HER2-low tumors. Among the 226 patients with sufficient pre-NAT tissue for RNAseq, DGE analyses demonstrated upregulation of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism (ACSM1) and steroid hormone metabolism (DHRS2, UGT2B28) in HER2-low tumors compared with HER2-zero tumors. Deconvolution analyses revealed no significant differences between predicted proportions of immune cell subpopulations between HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. Although rates of pCR were not significantly different between patients with HER2-zero (46%) and HER2-low tumors (40%) (p=0.34), non-pCR in patients with HER2-low tumors was associated with increased expression of EREG, which encodes an EGFR ligand, while non-pCR in patients with HER2-zero tumors was associated with downregulation in genes involved in immune response pathways. GSEA further identified the Hallmark allograft rejection (FDR q=0.001), interferon gamma response (FDR q=0.002), and interferon alpha response pathways (FDR q=0.007) as the 3 most significantly downregulated pathways in HER2-zero tumors from patients experiencing a non-pCR relative to HER2-zero tumors from patients experiencing a pCR. Conclusion: In early stage TNBC, low HER2 expression is associated with increased AR expression and upregulation of genes associated with fatty acid and steroid hormone metabolism. Gene expression analyses suggest that drivers of resistance to NAT differ between HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. Biological differences between HER2-zero and HER2-low tumors exist and may influence future personalized treatment for patients with early stage TNBC.
Citation Format: Clinton Yam, Ziyi Li, Anil Korkut, Wencai Ma, Elisabeth Kong, Holly A. Hill, Hussein Abbas, Sausan Abouharb, Beatriz Adrada, Banu K. Arun, Carlos H. Barcenas, Ajit Bisen, Daniel Booser, Aman Buzdar, Rosalind Candelaria, Junjie Chen, Alyson Clayborn, Senthil Damodaran, Qingqing Ding, Haven Garber, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kelly K. Hunt, Nuhad K. Ibrahim, Adaeze Iheme, Meghan S. Karuturi, Kimberly Koenig, Rachel M. Layman, Jangsoon Lee, Jennifer K. Litton, Melissa Mitchell, Giancarlo Moscol, Jason Mouabbi, Rashmi K. Murthy, Oluchi Oke, Paula Pohlmann, David Ramirez, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Sadia Saleem, Mediget Teshome, Vicente Valero, Jason White, Madison Williams, Wendy Woodward, Chasity Yajima, Naoto T. Ueno, Ken Chen, Gaiane Rauch, Lei Huo, Debu Tripathy. HER2-01 Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of HER2-low/zero Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yam
- 1Breast Medical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Ziyi Li
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Anil Korkut
- 3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Wencai Ma
- 4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Beatriz Adrada
- 9University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | - Aman Buzdar
- 14The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kelly K. Hunt
- 22The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jangsoon Lee
- 28The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | - Rashmi K. Murthy
- 33The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vicente Valero
- 40Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason White
- 41The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Naoto T. Ueno
- 45The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gaiane Rauch
- 47The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Lei Huo
- 48The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Debu Tripathy
- 49The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mitin N, Nyrop KA, Strum SL, Knecht A, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Claire Dees E, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, O'Hare EA, Muss HB. A biomarker of aging, p16, predicts peripheral neuropathy in women receiving adjuvant taxanes for breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:103. [PMID: 36075910 PMCID: PMC9458644 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00473-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying patients at higher risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major unmet need given its high incidence, persistence, and detrimental effect on quality of life. We determined if the expression of p16, a biomarker of aging and cellular senescence, predicts CIPN in a prospective, multi-center study of 152 participants enrolled between 2014 and 2018. Any women with newly diagnosed Stage I–III breast cancer scheduled to receive taxane-containing chemotherapy was eligible. The primary outcome was development of grade 2 or higher CIPN during chemotherapy graded by the clinician before each chemotherapy cycle (NCI-CTCAE v5 criteria). We measured p16 expression in peripheral blood T cells by qPCR before and at the end of chemotherapy. A multivariate model identified risk factors for CIPN and included taxane regimen type, p16Age Gap, a measure of discordance between chronological age and p16 expression, and p16 expression before chemotherapy. Participants with higher p16Age Gap—higher chronological age but lower p16 expression prior to chemotherapy - were at the highest risk. In addition, higher levels of p16 before treatment, regardless of patient age, conferred an increased risk of CIPN. Incidence of CIPN positively correlated with chemotherapy-induced increase in p16 expression, with the largest increase seen in participants with the lowest p16 expression before treatment. We have shown that p16 expression levels before treatment can identify patients at high risk for taxane-induced CIPN. If confirmed, p16 might help guide chemotherapy selection in early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E Claire Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erin A O'Hare
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kalra M, Henry E, McCann K, Karuturi MS, Bustamante Alvarez JG, Parkes A, Wesolowski R, Wei M, Mougalian SS, Durm G, Qin A, Schonewolf C, Trivedi M, Armaghani AJ, Wilson FH, Iams WT, Turk AA, Vikas P, Cecchini M, Lubner S, Pathak P, Spencer K, Koshkin VS, Labriola MK, Marshall CH, Beckermann KE, Sharifi MN, Bejjani AC, Hotchandani V, Housri S, Housri N. Making National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center Knowledge Accessible to Community Oncologists via an Online Tumor Board: Longitudinal Observational Study. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e33859. [PMID: 35588361 PMCID: PMC9164098 DOI: 10.2196/33859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Expert knowledge is often shared among multidisciplinary academic teams at tumor boards (TBs) across the country, but these conversations exist in silos and do not reach the wider oncology community. OBJECTIVE Using an oncologist-only question and answer (Q&A) website, we sought to document expert insights from TBs at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCI-CCCs) to provide educational benefits to the oncology community. METHODS We designed a process with the NCI-CCCs to document and share discussions from the TBs focused on areas of practice variation on theMednet, an interactive Q&A website of over 13,000 US oncologists. The faculty translated the TB discussions into concise, non-case-based Q&As on theMednet. Answers were peer reviewed and disseminated in email newsletters to registered oncologists. Reach and engagement were measured. Following each Q&A, a survey question asked how the TB Q&As impacted the readers' practice. RESULTS A total of 23 breast, thoracic, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary programs from 16 NCI-CCC sites participated. Between December 2016 and July 2021, the faculty highlighted 368 questions from their TBs. Q&As were viewed 147,661 times by 7381 oncologists at 3515 institutions from all 50 states. A total of 277 (75%) Q&As were viewed every month. Of the 1063 responses to a survey question on how the Q&A affected clinicians' practices, 646 (61%) reported that it confirmed their current practice, 163 (20%) indicated that a Q&A would change their future practice, and 214 (15%) reported learning something new. CONCLUSIONS Through an online Q&A platform, academics at the NCI-CCCs share knowledge outside the walls of academia with oncologists across the United States. Access to up-to-date expert knowledge can reassure clinicians' practices, significantly impact patient care in community practices, and be a source of new knowledge and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maitri Kalra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital, Fishers, IN, United States
| | - Elizabeth Henry
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, United States
| | - Kelly McCann
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, CA, United States
| | - Meghan S Karuturi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jean G Bustamante Alvarez
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Amanda Parkes
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Robert Wesolowski
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Mei Wei
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Utah City, UT, United States
| | - Sarah S Mougalian
- Department of Radiation/Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Gregory Durm
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Angel Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Caitlin Schonewolf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Meghna Trivedi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Herbert-Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Avan J Armaghani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Frederick H Wilson
- Department of Radiation/Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Wade T Iams
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Anita A Turk
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Praveen Vikas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Michael Cecchini
- Department of Radiation/Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sam Lubner
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Priyadarshini Pathak
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Kristen Spencer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers University Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, CA, United States
| | - Matthew K Labriola
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Catherine H Marshall
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Katy E Beckermann
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Marina N Sharifi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Anthony C Bejjani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Health Administration Greater Los Angeles Health System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | | | - Nadine Housri
- Department of Radiation/Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Karuturi MS, Giordano SH, Hoover DS, Volk RJ, Housten AJ. Exploring and supporting older women's chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:170-175. [PMID: 34955445 PMCID: PMC9045544 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have focused on the therapeutic decision-making process in older adults with breast cancer. This study investigated older adult breast cancer patients' perspectives on neo/adjuvant chemotherapy, thereby identifying informational needs and preferences as patients navigate the treatment decision-making process. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women ≥65 years diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer were recruited from an academic cancer center after deciding whether or not to receive neo/adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants completed surveys assessing sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy/numeracy, and shared decision making. They took part in individual semi-structured interviews to explore their perspectives, experiences, and values regarding treatment. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift qualitative approach. Quantitative data was summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of the 26 participants (age range 65-92 years; 81% non-Hispanic White; 72% ≥ college degree; 50% unmarried), 58% elected to undergo chemotherapy and 42% declined. The majority of participants had adequate health literacy/numeracy and engaged in shared decision-making. Thematic analysis revealed several commonalities regardless of the decision to undergo chemotherapy. Participants sought information regarding their disease/treatment. They referenced subjective experiences of friends/family members with cancer. Self-perception of health and the side effects of chemotherapy were also key factors. Participants placed importance on the maintenance of quality of life throughout treatment. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making strategies in older patients were shaped by knowledge, values, and the anecdotal experiences of others. Results can inform the development of decision support tools for older patients and physicians to better facilitate the shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Diana S Hoover
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert J Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ashley J Housten
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Layman RM, Lin H, Gutierrez Barrera AM, Karuturi MS, Yam C, Arun BK. Clinical outcomes and Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® in early-stage BRCA-associated hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 11:1474-1483. [PMID: 35128817 PMCID: PMC8921901 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background BRCA‐associated breast cancers tend to have distinctive features compared to sporadic breast cancers; further characterization can aid in optimizing treatment. Methods The study evaluated a patient cohort with early‐stage estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative invasive breast cancer who had Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® analysis and genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Data on patients and their breast cancers with outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results 745 patients were included, of whom 33 had pathogenic BRCA mutations (8 BRCA1, 25 BRCA2). Patients with BRCA mutations were younger and received more adjuvant chemotherapy, but less endocrine therapy and radiation therapy. BRCA‐associated breast cancers had less progesterone receptor expression, higher nuclear grade, and higher Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Scores® with median Recurrence Score® 29, compared to 16 in cancers without mutations (p < 0.0001). Breast cancer recurrence developed in 18% of patients with BRCA mutations and 9% of patient without mutations, although multivariate analysis of relapse‐free survival was not significant, HR 1.519 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–3.58; p = 0.3401). After adjusting for Recurrence Score®, overall survival by BRCA status was improved HR 0.448 (95% CI 0.06–3.34; p = 0.4333). Conclusions BRCA‐associated early‐stage hormone receptor‐positive breast cancers have higher Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® compared to those without mutations. BRCA status did not significantly impact relapse‐free survival and overall survival. Larger clinical trials are needed to further assess the findings, and if confirmed, could impact clinical management of BRCA‐associated breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Layman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Heather Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Clinton Yam
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nyrop KA, Damone EM, Deal AM, Wheeler SB, Charlot M, Reeve BB, Basch E, Shachar SS, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Wood WA, Muss HB. Patient-reported treatment toxicity and adverse events in Black and White women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:409-422. [PMID: 34739658 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06439-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is not known whether chemotherapy-related symptom experiences differ between Black and White women with early breast cancer (Stage I-III) receiving current chemotherapy regimens and, in turn, influences dose delay, dose reduction, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization. METHODS Patients self-reported their race and provided symptom reports for 17 major side effects throughout chemotherapy. Toxicity and adverse events were analyzed separately for anthracycline and non-anthracycline regimens. Fisher's exact tests and two-sample t-tests compared baseline patient characteristics. Modified Poisson regression estimated relative risks of moderate, severe, or very severe (MSVS) symptom severity, and chemotherapy-related adverse events.Please check and confirm that the authors and their respective affiliations have been correctly identified and amend if necessary.no changes RESULTS: In 294 patients accrued between 2014 and 2020, mean age was 58 (SD13) and 23% were Black. For anthracycline-based regimens, the only significant difference in MSVS symptoms was in lymphedema (41% Black vs 20% White, p = .04) after controlling for axillary surgery. For non-anthracycline regimens, the only significant difference was MSVS peripheral neuropathy (41% Blacks vs. 23% White) after controlling for taxane type (p = .05) and diabetes (p = .05). For all other symptoms, severity scores were similar. Dose reduction differed significantly for non-anthracycline regimens (49% Black vs. 25% White, p = .01), but not for anthracycline regimens or in dose delay, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization for either regimen. CONCLUSION Except for lymphedema and peripheral neuropathy, Black and White patients reported similar symptom severity during adjuvant chemotherapy. Dose reductions in Black patients were more common for non-anthracycline regimens. In this sample, there were minimal differences in patient-reported symptoms and other adverse outcomes in Black versus White patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Nyrop
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA. .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - E M Damone
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - A M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - M Charlot
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - B B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - E Basch
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S S Shachar
- Department of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - K E Reeder-Hayes
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E C Dees
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - T A Jolly
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - G G Kimmick
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - M S Karuturi
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R E Reinbolt
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - J C Speca
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | - W A Wood
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - H B Muss
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tamirisa N, Lin H, Shen Y, Shaitelman SF, Karuturi MS, Giordano SH, Babiera GV, Bedrosian I. Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older patients with comorbidities and estrogen receptor-positive, node-negative breast cancer-A National Cancer Database analysis. Cancer 2021; 127:2196-2203. [PMID: 33735487 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data are lacking about the benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in older patients with multiple comorbidities. The authors sought to determine the effect of ET on the survival of older patients who had multiple comorbidities and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, pathologic node-negative (pN0) breast cancer. METHODS Women aged ≥70 years in the National Cancer Database (2010-2014) with Charlson/Deyo comorbidity scores of 2 or 3 who had pathologic tumor (pT1)-pT3/pN0, ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer were divided into 2 cohorts: adjuvant ET and no ET. Propensity scores were used to match patients based on age, comorbidity score, facility type, pT classification, chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the effect of ET on overall survival (OS). RESULTS In the nonmatched cohort (n = 3716), 72.8% of patients received ET (n = 2705), and 27.2% did not (n = 1011). The patients who received ET were younger (mean age, 76 vs 79 years; P < .001) and had higher rates of breast conservation compared with those who did not receive ET (lumpectomy plus radiation: 43.4% vs 23.8%, respectively; P < .001). In the matched cohort (n = 1972), the median OS was higher in the ET group (79.2 vs 67.7 months; P < .0001). In the adjusted analysis, ET was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.83). CONCLUSIONS In older patients who have pN0, ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with comorbidities, adjuvant ET was associated with improved OS, which may have been overestimated given the confounders inherent in observational studies. To optimize outcomes in these patients, current standard recommendations should be considered stage-for-stage based on life expectancy and the level of tolerance to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Tamirisa
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heather Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gildy V Babiera
- MD Anderson Physician Network, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Isabelle Bedrosian
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Karuturi MS, Garrett A, Blum JL, Anderson J, Jepsen E, Pluard T, Stanton T, Manning K, Cappelleri JC, Beery F, Wang Y, Tripathy D. Abstract PS7-19: Pre/perimenopausal (preMeno) women receiving palbociclib (PAL) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a real-world setting: Treatment patterns from POLARIS. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps7-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: POLARIS is an ongoing, prospective, real world, noninterventional study in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2– ABC receiving PAL. This interim report describes real-world PAL use in preMeno pts. Methods: POLARIS has a targeted enrollment of 1500 pts from ~110 sites in the United States and Canada. Using patient data collected from medical charts and physician surveys, baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns were analyzed descriptively in self-reported preMeno pts with ABC. Results: At the data cutoff of May 20, 2020, 1208 pts were enrolled; 134 (11.1%) from 61 sites were preMeno, of whom 14.2% completed ≥6 months of PAL treatment. Among 134 preMeno pts (74.6%) who received first-line (1L) therapy, 69.0% received PAL+letrozole (LET) or anastrozole, 28.0% PAL+fulvestrant, and 3.0% PAL+exemestane. Median disease-free interval was 39.3 (range: 0 to 236) months; median treatment-free interval was 14.8 (-3 to 134) months. Of 34 pts (25.4%) who received PAL as second or later line (≥2L), 23.8% previously received hormonal therapy, 28.6% chemotherapy, and 14.3% both. The majority of pts (96.27%) initiated PAL at 125 mg regardless of line of therapy (Table). During the first PAL treatment cycle, 2.9% of all preMeno pts, 1% of 1L pts, and 8.8% of ≥2L pts had a dose reduction; 8.2%, 9%, and 5.9%, respectively, had an interruption. Dose reductions/interruptions peaked in cycle 2 (11.9%/15.7%); 56.67% of these modifications were due to adverse events. Conclusions: PAL is routinely prescribed in clinical practice for preMeno women with HR+/HER2- ABC. The majority of preMeno pts in this real-world dataset received PAL+LET as 1L ABC treatment; PAL was primarily initiated at the recommended dose (125 mg) and was well tolerated with few dose modifications required. Clinical trial identification: Pfizer (NCT03280303)
Table.CharacteristicFirst-Line Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (n=100)Second or Later Line Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (n=34)Pre/Perimenopausal Patients (N=134)Age at study enrollment, yMedian (range)44 (22-61)42.5 (27-58)44 (22-61)Distribution, n (%)<4032 (32.0)12 (35.3)44 (32.8)40–5045 (45.0)17 (50.0)62 (46.3)51–6923 (23.0)5 (14.7)28 (20.9)Race, n (%)White73 (73.0)26 (76.5)99 (73.9)Black or African American16 (16.0)4 (11.8)20 (14.9)Asian1 (1.0)1 (2.9)2 (1.5)Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander2 (2.0)0 (0.0)2 (1.5)American Indian or Alaska Native1 (1.0)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)Other3 (3.0)2 (5.9)5 (3.7)Not reported because of confidentiality regulations4 (4.0)1 (2.9)5 (3.7)Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, n (%)10 (10.0)3 (8.8)13 (9.7)Disease status, n (%)Visceral35 (35.0)13 (38.2)48 (35.8)Nonvisceral61 (61.0)17 (50.0)78 (58.2)Not reported4 (4.0)4 (11.8)8 (6.0)Bone metastases at mBC diagnosis, among patients with metastatic (stage IV) disease at study enrollment, n (%)Bone only40 (40)8 (23.5)48 (35.8)Bone plus other metastases32 (32)13 (38.2)45 (33.6)Disposition of patient ABC/mBC diagnosis at study at study enrollment, n (%)Recurrent from earlier stage (Stage 0-III)72 (72.0)18 (52.9)90 (67.2)De novo (Newly diagnosed Stage IV at enrollment)26 (26.0)15 (44.1)41 (30.6)Not reported2 (2.0)1 (2.9)3 (2.2)ECOG performance status at study enrollment (N, %)041 (41)15 (44.1)56 (41.8)126 (26)7 (20.6)33 (24.6)28 (8)3 (8.8)11 (8.2)32 (2)0 (0)2 (1.5)Not reported23 (23)9 (26.5)32 (23.9)Starting dose, first cycle of PAL treatment n (%)125 mg96 (96.0)33 (97.1)129 (96.3)100 mg2 (2.0)1 (2.9)3 (2.2)75 mg2 (2.0)0 (0.0)2 (1.5)Reason for first cycle starting dose <125 mg, n (%)Patient preference0 (0.0)1 (100)1 (25.0)Other3 (100)0 (0.0)3 (75.0)
Citation Format: Meghan S Karuturi, Adnan Garrett, Joanne L Blum, Jay Anderson, Erin Jepsen, Timothy Pluard, Thomas Stanton, Kenneth Manning, Joseph C Cappelleri, Faith Beery, Yao Wang, Debu Tripathy. Pre/perimenopausal (preMeno) women receiving palbociclib (PAL) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a real-world setting: Treatment patterns from POLARIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joanne L Blum
- 3Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Debu Tripathy
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shachar SS, Deal AM, Reeder-Hayes KE, Nyrop KA, Mitin N, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB. Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens on Expression of the Aging Biomarker, p16INK4a. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa082. [PMID: 33409457 PMCID: PMC7771421 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although chemotherapy saves lives, increasing evidence shows that chemotherapy accelerates aging. We previously demonstrated that mRNA expression of p16INK4a , a biomarker of senescence and molecular aging, increased early and dramatically after beginning adjuvant anthracycline-based regimens in early stage breast cancer patients. Here, we determined if changes in p16INK4a expression vary by chemotherapy regimen among early stage breast cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a study of stage I-III breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. p16INK4a expression was analyzed prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy (median 6.2 months after the last chemotherapy) in peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Chemotherapy-induced change in p16INK4a expression was compared among regimens. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS In 146 women, chemotherapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in p16INK4a expression (accelerated aging of 17 years; P < .001). Anthracycline-based regimens were associated with the largest increases (accelerated aging of 23 to 26 years; P ≤ .008). Nonanthracycline-based regimens demonstrated a much smaller increase (accelerated aging of 9 to 11 years; P ≤ .15). In addition to the type of chemotherapy regimen, baseline p16INK4a levels, but not chronologic age or race, were also associated with the magnitude of increases in p16INK4a . Patients with lower p16INK4a levels at baseline were more likely to experience larger increases. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the aging effects of chemotherapy may be influenced by both chemotherapy type and the patient's baseline p16INK4a level. Measurement of p16INK4a expression is not currently available in the clinic, but nonanthracycline regimens offering similar efficacy as anthracycline regimens might be favored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E Claire Dees
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Chen YT, Reeve BB, Basch EM, Wood WA, Shachar SS, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Lee JT, Brenizer A, Muss HB. Patient-reported symptom severity, interference with daily activities, and adverse events in older and younger women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Cancer 2020; 127:957-967. [PMID: 33216355 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, it is unknown whether patient-reported symptom severity and symptom interference with daily activities differ between younger (aged <65 years) and older (aged ≥65 years) women receiving similar chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer (EBC). METHODS Study participants rated 17 side effects of chemotherapy regimens currently in use in clinical practice (2014-2019). RESULTS Of 284 women with EBC (stage I-III), approximately 57% were aged <65 years and 43% were aged ≥65 years. For anthracycline-based regimens, a higher percentage of younger women reported moderate, severe, or very severe (MSVS) hot flashes (49% vs 18%) (P < .001). For nonanthracycline regimens, a higher percentage of younger women reported MSVS hot flashes (38% vs 19%) (P = .009) and a lower percentage reported MSVS arthralgia (28% vs 49%) (P = .005). With regard to symptom interference with daily activities, a higher percentage of younger women being treated with anthracycline-based regimens reported MSVS hot flashes (32% vs 7%) (P = .001) and myalgia (38% vs 18%) (P = .02). For nonanthracycline chemotherapy, a higher percentage of younger women reported MSVS interference for hot flashes (26% vs 9%) (P = .006) and lower percentages reported abdominal pain (13% vs 28%) (P = .02). Overall, there were no significant differences noted among younger versus older patients with regard to hospitalizations (19% vs 12%; P = .19), dose reductions (34% vs 31%; P = .50), dose delays (22% vs 25%; P = .59), or early treatment discontinuation (16% vs 16%; P = .9546). CONCLUSIONS Older and younger women with EBC who were treated with identical chemotherapy regimens generally experienced similar levels of symptom severity, symptom-related interference with daily activities, and adverse events. LAY SUMMARY In this study, women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer rated the severity of 17 symptoms and symptom interference with their activities of daily living. Older (aged ≥65 years) and younger (aged <65 years) women who received identical chemotherapy regimens generally experienced similar levels of symptom severity, symptom-related interference with daily activities, and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yi Tang Chen
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ethan M Basch
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William A Wood
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - E Claire Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Addison Brenizer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tripathy D, Blum JL, Rocque GB, Bardia A, Karuturi MS, Cappelleri JC, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Davis KL, Wang Y. POLARIS: a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study assessing palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Future Oncol 2020; 16:2475-2485. [PMID: 32787449 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This report describes the rationale, purpose and design of the POLARIS study. POLARIS is an ongoing noninterventional, prospective, multicenter study. Female and male patients in the USA and Canada diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in the study and treated with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib when hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer was deemed to be indicated by their physician. The study will provide real-world data on palbociclib prescribing and treatment patterns in routine clinical practice, associated clinical outcomes, treatment sequencing in the advanced/metastatic setting, patient quality of life and geriatric-specific assessments. The tumor genomic landscape in relation to clinical outcomes will be explored. POLARIS will identify benefits and side effects of palbociclib across multiple lines of therapy and in discrete subsets of patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03280303 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debasish Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Breast Medical Oncology, Unit 1354, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joanne L Blum
- Texas Oncology, 3410 Worth Street, Suite 400, Dallas, TX 75246, USA
| | - Gabrielle B Rocque
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 701 20th Street South, 1170 Administration Building, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, LRH 304, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Meghan S Karuturi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Breast Medical Oncology, Unit 1354, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Yuan Liu
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E. 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E. 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Keith L Davis
- RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Yao Wang
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E. 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Reeve BB, Basch E, Chen YT, Park JH, Shachar SS, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Lee JT, Wood WA, Muss HB. Congruence of patient- and clinician-reported toxicity in women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:3084-3093. [PMID: 32315091 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, collected alongside the clinician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, enables comparisons of patient and clinician reports on treatment toxicity. METHODS In a multisite study of women receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, symptom reports were collected on the same day from patients and their clinicians for 17 symptoms; their data were not shared with each other. The proportions of moderate, severe, or very severe patient-reported symptom severity were compared with the proportions of clinician-rated grade 2, 3, or 4 toxicity. Patient-clinician agreement was assessed via κ statistics. Chi-square tests investigated whether patient characteristics were associated with patient-clinician agreement. RESULTS Among 267 women, the median age was 58 years (range, 24-83 years), and 26% were nonwhite. There was moderate scoring agreement (κ = 0.413-0.570) for 53% of symptoms, fair agreement for 41% (κ = 0.220-0.378), and slight agreement for 6% (κ = 0.188). For example, patient-reported and clinician-rated percentages were 22% and 8% for severe or very severe fatigue, 41% and 46% for moderate fatigue, 32% and 39% for mild fatigue, and 6% and 7% for none. Clinician severity scores were lower for nonwhite patients in comparison with white patients for peripheral neuropathy, nausea, arthralgia, and dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS Although clinician reporting of symptoms is common practice in oncology, there is suboptimal agreement with the gold standard of patient self-reporting. These data provide further evidence supporting the integration of patient-reported outcomes into oncological clinical research and clinical practice to improve monitoring of symptoms as well as timely interventions for symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ethan Basch
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yi Tang Chen
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ji Hye Park
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth C Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Meghan S Karuturi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | | | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William A Wood
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bardia A, Blum JL, McCune SL, Patel K, Frank RC, Mosalpuria K, Karuturi MS, Shabazz LA, Rocque GB, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Wang J, Wang Y, Tripathy D. Abstract 443: Blood-based genotyping and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in real-world settings: Results from POLARIS. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:POLARIS is a prospective, real-world (RW) study of palbociclib (PAL) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the US and Canada. Analyses include evaluating the association between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and clinical response to PAL.
Methods: All pts provided informed consent. Blood samples are collected on day 1 of each 4-wk cycle for 6 cycles, at day 1 of every 2-3 cycles, and end of treatment. ctDNA is sequenced using the Guardant360 platform for somatic single-nucleotide variants in complete or critical exons of 73 genes. Analyses include association between clinical outcomes and ctDNA mutation frequencies at baseline and change from baseline to cycle 2, day 1 (C2D1), stratified by line of prior therapy.
Results: As of July 2018, 127 pts had ≥1 evaluable ctDNA measurement. Of these, 104 had baseline and C2D1 results; 96 had tumor response assessed. The most common mutations at baseline were PIK3CA (41%), TP53 (33%), and ESR1 (20%). PAL was associated with a decline in mutation frequency of PIK3CA, TP53, and ESR1alleles but not all genes, highlighting differential response based on genomic profile and clonal heterogeneity (Table). Overall, fast progressors (progression <6 mo, n=19) tended to have higher baseline ctDNA values and displayed smaller decreases in ctDNA at C2D1 than slow progressors (progression ≥6 mo, n=4).
Conclusions: This study is among the first to provide RW data on blood-based genotyping. Interim data indicate that genomic architecture and longitudinal changes may be predictive and prognostic in pts with HR+/HER2– ABC receiving PAL. Updated data from 239 pts will be presented, including association between individual ctDNA mutation dynamics, clonal heterogeneity, and clinical outcomes (therapeutic response and progression-free survival). Pfizer; NCT03280303
Change from baseline in ctDNA mutation frequencyMutationOverall (n=104)*First Line (n=70)Second Line and Later (n=34)Baseline, n (%)†C2D1, n (%)†Baseline, n (%)†C2D1, n (%)†Baseline, n (%)†C2D1, n (%)†PIK3CA43 (41)26 (25)27 (39)14 (20)16 (47)12 (35)TP5334 (33)27 (26)23 (33)17 (24)11(32)10 (29)ESR121 (20)11 (11)9 (13)3 (4)12 (35)8 (24)ARID1A19 (18)14 (13)13 (19)7 (10)6 (18)7 (21)NF111 (11)11 (11)7 (10)6 (9)4 (12)5 (15)BRCA210 (10)10 (10)8 (11)7 (10)2 (6)3 (9)GATA310 (10)5 (5)8 (11)5 (7)2 (6)O (O)None detected13 (13)24 (23)7 (10)20 (29)6 (18)4 (12)ctDNA=circulating tumor DNA; C2D1=cycle 2, day 1. *Patients with both baseline and C2D1 ctDNA data available. †Percentages are relative to the corresponding number of patients (n).
Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Joanne L. Blum, Steven L. McCune, Kamal Patel, Richard C. Frank, Kailash Mosalpuria, Meghan S. Karuturi, Lloyd A. Shabazz, Gabrielle B. Rocque, Yuan Liu, Zhe Zhang, Jian Wang, Yao Wang, Debu Tripathy. Blood-based genotyping and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in real-world settings: Results from POLARIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 443.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Bardia
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joanne L. Blum
- 2Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Debu Tripathy
- 7The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Reeder-Hayes KE, Shachar SS, Reeve BB, Basch E, Choi SK, Lee JT, Wood WA, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB. Patient-reported and clinician-reported chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with early breast cancer: Current clinical practice. Cancer 2019; 125:2945-2954. [PMID: 31090930 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the current study, the authors investigated the incidence of moderate to severe chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) for chemotherapy regimens commonly used in current clinical practice for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer. Patient-reported and clinician-assessed CIPN severity scores were compared, and risk factors for CIPN severity were identified. METHODS Patients completed a Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring form and oncologists completed a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events form. CIPN reports were collected prospectively during regularly scheduled infusion visits throughout the duration of chemotherapy. RESULTS The sample included 184 women with a mean age of 55 years; approximately 73% were white. The 4 chemotherapy regimens used were doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel (60 patients); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (50 patients); docetaxel, carboplatin, and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (24 patients); and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (18 patients). All patients treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel and carboplatin received paclitaxel; all patients treated with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide and docetaxel, carboplatin, and anti-HER2 received docetaxel. The chemotherapy dose was reduced in 52 patients (28%); in 15 patients (29%), this reduction was due to CIPN. Chemotherapy was discontinued in 26 patients (14%), 8 because of CIPN. Agreement between patient-reported and clinician-assessed CIPN severity scores was minimal (weighted Cohen kappa, P = .34). Patient-reported moderate to severe CIPN was higher for paclitaxel (50%) compared with docetaxel (17.7%) (P < .001). Pretreatment arthritis and/or rheumatism (relative risk [RR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06-2.35 [P = .023]) and regimens containing paclitaxel (RR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.72-4.83 [P < .0001]) were associated with higher CIPN severity. Being married (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.887 [P = .01]) was found to be associated with lower CIPN severity. CONCLUSIONS The discrepancy between patient-reported and clinician-assessed CIPN underscores the need for both patient and clinician perspectives regarding this common, dose-limiting, and potentially disabling side effect of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn E Reeder-Hayes
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ethan Basch
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Seul Ki Choi
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William A Wood
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Carey K Anders
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth C Dees
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - JoEllen C Speca
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Karuturi MS, Holmes HM, Lei X, Johnson M, Barcenas CH, Cantor SB, Gallick GE, Bast RC, Giordano SH. Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria in older patients with breast and colorectal cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:705-708. [PMID: 30795923 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Screening for potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) is recommended in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, given the concern for adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions and non-adherence. Our objective was to determine the impact of PIM on outcomes in patients with breast and colorectal cancers receiving chemotherapy. METHODS We used data from the SEER-Medicare database, including patients >/= 66 years old with a diagnosis of Stage II/III breast and colorectal cancer made between 7/1/2007-12/31/2009. We used modified STOPP criteria to define baseline PIM as a dichotomous variable in the 4 months prior to diagnosis. STOPP criteria was used based on its performance as a robust measure of PIM. Outcomes measures included ER visits, hospitalizations, and death within 3 months from the last chemotherapy, and a composite of the three. We used Chi-square or Fisher's exact test to determine associations of PIM with covariates and outcomes, and Cox proportional hazards (PH) model for the time-to-event analysis. RESULTS Final analysis included 1,595 patients with breast cancer and 1,528 patients with colorectal cancer. Frequency of baseline PIM by STOPP was 31.5% in the breast and 30.9% in the colorectal cohort. In the breast cohort, associations with the composite outcome in the Cox PH model included disease stage, comorbidity, medication number and baseline ER visits/hospitalization. Age, gender, race, comorbidity and baseline ER visits/hospitalization were associated in the colorectal cohort. PIM was not associated with outcomes in either cohort, aside from hospitalization in the breast. CONCLUSIONS We found no consistent association between pre-chemotherapy PIM defined by STOPP and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan S Karuturi
- Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
| | - Holly M Holmes
- Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | | | - Carlos H Barcenas
- Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Scott B Cantor
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Gary E Gallick
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Robert C Bast
- Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Shachar SS, Basch E, Reeve BB, Choi SK, Lee JT, Wood WA, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB. Patient-Reported Toxicities During Chemotherapy Regimens in Current Clinical Practice for Early Breast Cancer. Oncologist 2018; 24:762-771. [PMID: 30552158 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study explores the incidence of patient-reported major toxicity-symptoms rated "moderate," "severe," or "very severe"-for chemotherapy regimens commonly used in early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Female patients aged 21 years or older completed a validated Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring instrument and rated 17 symptoms throughout adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fisher's exact tests compared differences in percentages in symptom ratings, and general linear regression was used to model the incidence of patient-reported major toxicity. RESULTS In 152 patients, the mean age was 54 years (range, 24-77), and 112 (74%) were white; 51% received an anthracycline-based regimen. The proportion of patients rating fatigue, constipation, myalgia, diarrhea, nausea, peripheral neuropathy, and swelling of arms or legs as a major toxicity at any time during chemotherapy varied significantly among four chemotherapy regimens (p < .05). The mean (SD) number of symptoms rated major toxicities was 6.3 (3.6) for anthracycline-based and 4.4 (3.5) for non-anthracycline-based regimens (p = .001; possible range, 0-17 symptoms). Baseline higher body mass index (p = .03), patient-reported Karnofsky performance status ≤80 (p = .0003), and anthracycline-based regimens (p = .0003) were associated with greater total number of symptoms rated major toxicities (alternative model: chemotherapy duration, p < .0001). Twenty-six percent of dose reductions (26 of 40), 75% of hospitalizations (15 of 20), and 94% of treatment discontinuations (15 of 16) were in anthracycline-based regimens. CONCLUSION Capturing multiple toxicity outcomes throughout chemotherapy enables oncologists and patients to understand the range of side effects as they discuss treatment efficacies. Continuous symptom monitoring may aid in the timely development of interventions that minimize toxicity and improve outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study investigated patient-reported toxicities for 17 symptoms recorded prospectively during adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer. An analysis of four commonly used chemotherapy regimens identified significant differences among regimens in both individual symptoms and total number of symptoms rated moderate, severe, or very severe. Longer chemotherapy regimens, such as anthracycline-based regimens followed by paclitaxel, had higher proportions of symptoms rated major toxicities. The inclusion of patient perspectives on multiple toxicity outcomes at the same time at multiple time points during chemotherapy has the potential for improving patient-provider communication regarding symptom management, patient satisfaction, and long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Ethan Basch
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Seul Ki Choi
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - William A Wood
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Karuturi MS, Holmes HM, Lei X, Johnson M, Barcenas CH, Cantor SB, Gallick GE, Bast RC, Giordano SH. Potentially inappropriate medication use in older patients with breast and colorectal cancer. Cancer 2018; 124:3000-3007. [PMID: 29689595 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to determine patient characteristics associated with potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and its impact on outcomes for patients with breast or colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, linked to Medicare claims, was used. The cohort included patients who were 66 years old or older and were diagnosed with stage II or III breast or colorectal cancer between July 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009. The Drugs to Avoid in the Elderly (DAE) list and the Beers criteria were used to identify PIM use. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression determined the association of baseline PIMs with covariates. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from chemotherapy initiation to the first emergency room (ER) visit, hospitalization, death, or a composite until 3 months after chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined the association of PIMs with EFS. RESULTS The analysis included 1595 patients with breast cancer and 1528 patients with colorectal cancer. The baseline PIM frequencies were 22.2% (according to the DAE list) and 27.6% (according to the Beers criteria) in the breast cohort and 15.5% (according to the DAE list) and 24.8% (according to the Beers criteria) in the colorectal cohort. Among patients with breast cancer, 37.5% had at least 1 adverse outcome; associations included the use of ≥5 medications, an advanced stage, higher comorbidity, and prior ER visits/hospitalizations. Baseline PIM use according to the DAE list was associated with an increased risk of death in patients with breast cancer. Among patients with colorectal cancer, 45% had at least 1 adverse outcome, and associations included the use of ≥5 medications, older age, female sex, and higher comorbidity. A time-to-event analysis revealed no association between baseline PIM use and most outcomes. CONCLUSIONS These findings require further prospective confirmation, but they support a correlation between polypharmacy and adverse outcomes for cancer patients and call into question the association with PIMs. Cancer 2018;124:3000-7. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Holly M Holmes
- Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Carlos H Barcenas
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott B Cantor
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gary E Gallick
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert C Bast
- Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kono M, Fujii T, Lyons GR, Huo L, Bassett R, Gong Y, Karuturi MS, Tripathy D, Ueno NT. Abstract P3-05-04: Impact of androgen receptor expression in fluoxymesterone-treated, estrogen receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer exposed to contemporary hormonal therapy. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p3-05-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The use of the nonselective androgen fluoxymesterone in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) diminished after the 1960s because of its adverse events and a limited understanding of its biological effects. Although fluoxymesterone has had efficacy against tamoxifen-resistant disease in clinical studies, its role in the era of contemporary hormonal therapy is unclear. Recent studies have shown that the androgen–androgen receptor (AR) complex acts as a suppressor of estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer. We hypothesized that fluoxymesterone is effective against MBC that progresses despite contemporary hormonal therapy and that the drug has more clinical benefit in patients with ER+AR+ disease than in patients with ER+AR- disease. We evaluated the survival outcomes of patients with MBC who received fluoxymesterone after contemporary hormonal therapy failed and evaluated the association between ER/AR status and survival outcomes in these patients.
Methods and Materials: We included 103 patients treated with fluoxymesterone who had already received at least one prior hormonal or cytotoxic treatment for MBC between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2014, at a single institution. A pathologist reviewed these patients' tumors' ER and AR expression levels by immunohistochemical staining. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from the start of fluoxymesterone treatment to the date of disease progression or last follow-up. We used Cox regression analysis to examine univariate and multivariate correlates of PFS.
Results: Patients received a median of 3 (range: 0-10) prior hormonal therapies (aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and/or fulvestrant) before fluoxymesterone. Of the 103 patients, 33 (32%) discontinued fluoxymesterone because of physician decision or adverse events, which included toxicity in 14 patients, and 70 (68%) were eligible for tumor response assessment by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Of these 70 patients, 2 (3%) had a complete response, 7 (10%) had a partial response, and 21 (30%) had stable disease for at least 6 months, yielding a clinical benefit rate of 43%. The median PFS was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval: 3.2–5.3 months). The multivariate analysis revealed no significant association between PFS and the type or number of prior treatments. Thirty-nine patients (38%) had archived tumor slides available for AR staining. All 39 patients had ER+ disease; 5 had ≤1%, 5 had >1% but <10%, 18 had ≥10%, and 11 had no AR nuclear expression. AR positivity defined by the presence of any AR+ cells, ≥1% AR+ cells, or ≥10% AR+ cells was not significantly associated with survival outcome.
Conclusions: Fluoxymesterone showed objective tumor response and prolonged control of ER+ MBC refractory to contemporary endocrine therapy. The number and type of prior treatments did not impact the drug's clinical benefit, and AR+ status did not influence the clinical outcome. Fluoxymesterone should be considered for patients whose ER+ MBC progresses despite contemporary hormonal therapy, regardless of their AR status.
Citation Format: Kono M, Fujii T, Lyons GR, Huo L, Bassett R, Gong Y, Karuturi MS, Tripathy D, Ueno NT. Impact of androgen receptor expression in fluoxymesterone-treated, estrogen receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer exposed to contemporary hormonal therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kono
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - T Fujii
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - GR Lyons
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - L Huo
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - R Bassett
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - Y Gong
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - MS Karuturi
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - D Tripathy
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| | - NT Ueno
- Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Biostatistics, Houston, TX; Pathology, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Loh KP, Janelsins MC, Mohile SG, Holmes HM, Hsu T, Inouye SK, Karuturi MS, Kimmick GG, Lichtman SM, Magnuson A, Whitehead MI, Wong ML, Ahles TA. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2016; 7:270-80. [PMID: 27197918 PMCID: PMC4969145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Revised: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) can occur during or after chemotherapy and represents a concern for many patients with cancer. Among older patients with cancer, in whom there is little clinical trial evidence examining side effects like CRCI, many unanswered questions remain regarding risk for and resulting adverse outcomes from CRCI. Given the rising incidence of cancer with age, CRCI is of particular concern for older patients with cancer who receive treatment. Therefore, research related to CRCI in older patients with cancers is a high priority. In this manuscript, we discuss current gaps in research highlighting the lack of clinical studies of CRCI in older adults, the complex mechanisms of CRCI, and the challenges in measuring cognitive impairment in older patients with cancer. Although we focus on CRCI, we also discuss cognitive impairment related to cancer itself and other treatment modalities. We highlight several research priorities to improve the study of CRCI in older patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kah Poh Loh
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, United States.
| | | | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, United States
| | - Holly M Holmes
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States
| | - Tina Hsu
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Canada
| | - Sharon K Inouye
- Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, United States; Hebrew Senior Life, United States
| | | | | | | | - Allison Magnuson
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, United States
| | | | - Melisa L Wong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Chen H, Karuturi MS, Chavez-MacGregor M, Tsavachidis S, Meric-Bernstam F, Do KA, Hortobagyi GN, Thompson PA, Mills GB, Bondy ML, Blumenschein GR. Frequency of mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor gene (MET) and the catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PIK3CA) copy number elevation and correlation with outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer. Cancer 2013; 119:7-15. [PMID: 22736407 PMCID: PMC3461089 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2012] [Revised: 02/09/2012] [Accepted: 02/22/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to determine the frequency and association between recurrence-free survival (RFS) and MET and catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PIK3CA) copy number elevations in patients with early stage breast cancer. METHODS Tumor DNA was extracted from 971 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded early breast cancers for molecular inversion probes arrays. Data were segmented using the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-FASST2 segmentation algorithm. Copy number gains were called when the copy number of each segment was greater than 2.3 or 1.7, respectively. RFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine independent associations between copy number and RFS. RESULTS Of the 971 tumors studied, 82 (8.44%) and 134 (13.8%) had an elevation of the MET or PIK3CA copy number, respectively, and 25.6% of tumors with a MET copy number elevation had a PIK3CA copy number elevation. Patients with either a MET or PI3KCA high copy number tended to have poorer prognostic features (larger tumor size, higher tumor grade, and hormone receptor negativity). Both MET and PIK3CA high copy numbers were more likely to occur in patients with triple receptor-negative disease (P = .019 and P < .001, respectively). At a median follow-up of 7.4 years, there were 252 cases of disease recurrence. The 5-year RFS rates were 63.5% and 83.1% for MET high copy number and MET normal/low copy number, respectively (P = .06) and 73.1%, and 82.3% for PIK3CA high copy number and PIK3CA normal/low copy number, respectively (P = .15). A high copy number for either gene was not found to be an independent predictor of RFS. CONCLUSIONS A high copy number of MET or PIK3CA was found to be associated with poorer prognostic features and triple receptor-negative disease. Coamplification was frequent. Patients with tumors with high MET copy numbers tended to have a worse RFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|