Impact of a new carrageenan-based vaginal microbicide in a female population with genital HPV-infection: first experimental results

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess safety, satisfaction, and anti-viral effect of a new carrageenan-based vaginal microbicide in a population of fertile female patients with genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty healthy and sexually active women aged 18-45 years with genital HPV infection were enrolled. Each subject was treated with a gel formulated with 0.02% carrageenan and Propionibacterium extract (CGP) (Carvir, Depofarma SpA, Mogliano Veneto, Treviso, Italy). The subjects were evaluated at baseline, after the I cycle of therapy and after the II cycle. At final status, treatment acceptability and satisfaction were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. Furthermore, the rate of HPV genital infection clearance at final follow-up was evaluated. These data were compared with the HPV genital infection clearance rate in a control group of patients not subjected to any therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 HPV infections were detected at baseline, among 40 subjects enrolled. The HPV 16 genotype was the most frequent (12%) followed by HPV 18 (10%), and HPV 53 (9%). At the end of the study, 22 (55%) patients were very satisfied, 14 (35%) were satisfied, 3 (7.5%) were uncertain, and only 1 (2.5%) was dissatisfied, with 0 very dissatisfied. Only 2 patients complained of a local adverse event. Analysing infection clearance at the end of the study, 60% of patients became HPV negative. Among these, 13 cases were high-risk HPV infection. There were 16 patients with persistent infection ("non-responders"). No patient developed a "de novo" genital lesion. After controlling for age, the intervention had an adjusted OR of 4.9 (95% CI 1.6-15.1) to clear HPV.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this work suggest that Carvir vulvovaginal microbicide gel is safe and well-tolerated. Furthermore, this experience supports the hypothesis that CG has a role in accelerating the normal clearance of genital HPV infection in women with a positive HPV-DNA test.

Genomic Heterogeneity as a Barrier to Precision Medicine in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) is a lethal disease where targeted therapies, even when guided by genomic biomarkers, have had limited efficacy. A potential reason for the failure of such therapies is that genomic profiling results could commonly differ between the primary and metastatic tumors. To evaluate genomic heterogeneity, we sequenced paired primary GEA and synchronous metastatic lesions across multiple cohorts, finding extensive differences in genomic alterations, including discrepancies in potentially clinically relevant alterations. Multiregion sequencing showed significant discrepancy within the primary tumor (PT) and between the PT and disseminated disease, with oncogene amplification profiles commonly discordant. In addition, a pilot analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing demonstrated the feasibility of detecting genomic amplifications not detected in PT sampling. Lastly, we profiled paired primary tumors, metastatic tumors, and cfDNA from patients enrolled in the personalized antibodies for GEA (PANGEA) trial of targeted therapies in GEA and found that genomic biomarkers were recurrently discrepant between the PT and untreated metastases. Divergent primary and metastatic tissue profiling led to treatment reassignment in 32% (9/28) of patients. In discordant primary and metastatic lesions, we found 87.5% concordance for targetable alterations in metastatic tissue and cfDNA, suggesting the potential for cfDNA profiling to enhance selection of therapy.Significance: We demonstrate frequent baseline heterogeneity in targetable genomic alterations in GEA, indicating that current tissue sampling practices for biomarker testing do not effectively guide precision medicine in this disease and that routine profiling of metastatic lesions and/or cfDNA should be systematically evaluated. Cancer Discov; 8(1); 37-48. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Sundar and Tan, p. 14See related article by Janjigian et al., p. 49This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.

Molecular profiling of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) patients from a phase I/II study using circulating tumor DNA

4124

Background: PC has a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival of 9%. Targeted therapies have yet to demonstrate improved outcomes in this disease. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) may be used as a non-invasive method for the detection and quantification of genomic abnormalities. We performed a retrospective-prospective study to assess molecular alterations in the ctDNA of advanced PC patients. Methods: Plasma samples were banked from patients enrolled in the previously reported Phase Ib/II trial of gemcitabine with placebo or vismodegib (NCT01064622; Catenacci et al JCO 2015). Eligible patients had unresectable PC and no prior therapy for metastatic disease. Patient samples ( < 3ml) collected pre-treatment and at regular intervals and stored for ~6-8 years were analyzed using InVision (enhanced tagged-amplicon sequencing) for “hotspot” regions of 34 genes, including KRAS (exons 2 and 3), and select full gene coverage. Results: Of 113 patients enrolled in the trial, a cohort of 72 patients were included in this study. Baseline plasma ctDNA profiling detected any genomic event in 88% of patients (SNV/indels found at range of 0.07%-23% allele fraction (AF) with 20% detected at < 0.5% AF). Patients had between 1-5 mutations (median, 2): KRAS mutations were detected in 80% of patients tested, of which 86% had concurrent KRAS/TP53 mutation(s) and 16% with concurrent KRAS/TP53/CDK2NA. Of note, 2 cases presented with IDH1 point mutations (R132C, R132H). An ERBB2 amplification and a FGFR2 amplification were detected in 2 individuals. An update on the analyses will include serial ctDNA testing during treatment and correlation with outcomes. Conclusions: ctDNA analysis of this cohort of banked PC plasma samples described the landscape of genomic aberrations at baseline and over time, including rare but potentially important actionable events including ERBB2 and FGFR2 amplifications and IDH1 mutation. We demonstrate a sensitive method for re-analysing trial outcomes, despite limiting plasma volume and time lapse since samples were collected.