Excessive sleepiness: under-recognized and essential marker for sleep/wake disorder management

BACKGROUND

Research during the past few decades has provided substantial evidence indicating that excessive sleepiness (ES) and associated sleep/wake disorders can result in significant morbidity and mortality. However, symptomatology (e.g., ES) and the relationships among common morbidities (e.g., cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, mood impairment) and sleep/wake disorders remain under-recognized in clinical practice, particularly in primary care. Yet assessment of sleep/wakefulness and associated symptoms can often be easily conducted in the primary care setting, providing valuable information to facilitate the diagnosis and management of sleep/wake disorders.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a conceptual and educational framework that helps primary care physicians comprehensively assess, differentially diagnosis, and appropriately manage patients presenting with ES or ES-related sleep/wake disorders.

METHODS

Comprised of six sleep specialists and six primary care physicians, the Sleep/Wake Disorders Working Group (SWG) used a modified, two-round Delphi approach to create and harmonize consensus recommendations for the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of patients with common sleep/wake disorders related to ES.

RESULTS

After a review of the relevant literature, the SWG arrived at consensus on a number of clinical recommendations for the assessment and management ES and some of the most commonly associated sleep/wake disorders. Ten consensus statements – five each for assessment/diagnosis and treatment/ongoing care – were created for ES, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, circadian rhythm disorders, restless legs syndrome, and narcolepsy.

CONCLUSION

ES and ES-related sleep/wake disorders are commonly encountered in the primary care setting. By providing an educational framework for primary care physicians, the SWG hopes to improve patient outcomes by emphasizing recognition, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate ongoing management of ES and associated sleep/wake disorders.

Clinical guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic insomnia in adults

Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder in the general population, and is commonly encountered in medical practices. Insomnia is defined as the subjective perception of difficulty with sleep initiation, duration, consolidation, or quality that occurs despite adequate opportunity for sleep, and that results in some form of daytime impairment.1 Insomnia may present with a variety of specific complaints and etiologies, making the evaluation and management of chronic insomnia demanding on a clinician's time. The purpose of this clinical guideline is to provide clinicians with a practical framework for the assessment and disease management of chronic adult insomnia, using existing evidence-based insomnia practice parameters where available, and consensus-based recommendations to bridge areas where such parameters do not exist. Unless otherwise stated, "insomnia" refers to chronic insomnia, which is present for at least a month, as opposed to acute or transient insomnia, which may last days to weeks.

Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine

Based on a review of literature and consensus, the Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) makes the following recommendations: unattended portable monitoring (PM) for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) should be performed only in conjunction with a comprehensive sleep evaluation. Clinical sleep evaluations using PM must be supervised by a practitioner with board certification in sleep medicine or an individual who fulfills the eligibility criteria for the sleep medicine certification examination. PM may be used as an alternative to polysomnography (PSG) for the diagnosis of OSA in patients with a high pretest probability of moderate to severe OSA. PM is not appropriate for the diagnosis of OSA in patients with significant comorbid medical conditions that may degrade the accuracy of PM. PM is not appropriate for the diagnostic evaluation of patients suspected of having comorbid sleep disorders. PM is not appropriate for general screening of asymptomatic populations. PM may be indicated for the diagnosis of OSA in patients for whom in-laboratory PSG is not possible by virtue of immobility, safety, or critical illness. PM may also be indicated to monitor the response to non-CPAP treatments for sleep apnea. At a minimum, PM must record airflow, respiratory effort, and blood oxygenation. The airflow, effort, and oximetric biosensors conventionally used for in-laboratory PSG should be used in PM. The Task Force recommends that PM testing be performed under the auspices of an AASM-accredited comprehensive sleep medicine program with written policies and procedures. An experienced sleep technologist/technician must apply the sensors or directly educate patients in sensor application. The PM device must allow for display of raw data with the capability of manual scoring or editing of automated scoring by a qualified sleep technician/technologist. A board certified sleep specialist, or an individual who fulfills the eligibility criteria for the sleep medicine certification examination, must review the raw data from PM using scoring criteria consistent with current published AASM standards. Under the conditions specified above, PM may be used for unattended studies in the patient's home. Afollow-up visit to review test results should be performed for all patients undergoing PM. Negative or technically inadequate PM tests in patients with a high pretest probability of moderate to severe OSA should prompt in-laboratory polysomnography.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a patient with medulloblastoma

We present one adult patient with medulloblastoma who developed polysomnographically documented obstructive sleep apnea after posterior fossa surgery. The sleep apnea worsened in conjunction with clinical and imaging-confirmed neoplastic progression and clinically improved after craniospinal radiation therapy. Medulloblastoma or its surgical treatment has never before been implicated in a sleep-related breathing disorder. We discuss possible mechanisms for its occurrence and management implications.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a patient with medulloblastoma

We present one adult patient with medulloblastoma who developed polysomnographically documented obstructive sleep apnea after posterior fossa surgery. The sleep apnea worsened in conjunction with clinical and imaging-confirmed neoplastic progression and clinically improved after craniospinal radiation therapy. Medulloblastoma or its surgical treatment has never before been implicated in a sleep-related breathing disorder. We discuss possible mechanisms for its occurrence and management implications.

Measuring quality of care in psychiatric emergencies: construction and evaluation of a Bayesian index

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine whether an index for measuring quality of care for psychiatric emergencies is reliable and valid.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING

The study used primary data collected over a 12-month period from two urban hospitals in the Northeast. One had 700 inpatient beds, an inpatient psychiatric unit, and community mental health personnel located in the emergency department. The other had 300 beds but none of the other hospital's features.

STUDY DESIGN

The index was developed by a panel of experts in emergency psychiatry using a subjective Bayesian statistical methodology and was evaluated in terms of its ability to: (1) predict a second panel's judgments of quality; (2) predict a specific quality-related patient outcome, i.e., compliance with follow-up recommendations; (3) provide a reliable measurement procedure; and (4) detect variations in patterns of emergency department practices.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Data were collected on 2,231 randomly selected emergency psychiatric patients (psychiatric diagnosis, alcohol abuse, nonverbal patients experiencing a psychiatric emergency, and patients with somatic complaints such as life crisis) treated in the emergency departments of the two hospitals.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The index predicted physician judgments of quality, was reliable, exhibited sufficient variation in scores, and was strongly associated with patient compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that a subjective Bayesian model can be used to develop a reliable and valid index for measuring quality of care, with potential for practical application in management of health services.

The effects of midazolam and temazepam on sleep and performance when administered in the middle of the night

A multicenter, double-blind, sleep laboratory and performance study was conducted to evaluate the hypnotic efficacy and residual effects of midazolam (15 mg) and temazepam (30 mg) compared to placebo when administered in the middle of the night. Eighteen volunteers with objectively verified sleep maintenance insomnia received placebo for 3 nights during week 1 (adaptation and screening). During weeks 2, 3, and 4 they received 2 consecutive nights of midazolam, temazepam, and placebo (one treatment per week) in a balanced crossover design. Treatment was administered in the middle of the night (3.5 hours after bedtime). Neither drug reduced the latency to return to sleep after the middle of the night awakening. Both drugs significantly increased total sleep time, reduced wake during sleep, and number of awakenings over 4.5 hours in bed after treatment. In the morning (5 to 6.5 hours postdrug) significant performance decrements and reduced daytime sleep latency (7 hours postdrug) were found with temazepam but not midazolam.

Sleep laboratory and performance evaluation of midazolam in insomniacs

This study evaluated laboratory sleep and performance after placebo, after 5, 10 and 20 mg of midazolam and after 30 mg of flurazepam. EEG recordings showed that 20 mg of midazolam significantly decreased sleep latency and stage 1 sleep, increased stage 2 sleep, and delayed the onset of the first REM period when compared with placebo. Subjective reports from the patients showed that the dose decreased the frequency of awakenings. In the morning, 9 h after drug ingestion, performance on most tests was affected very little by 20 mg of midazolam. However, performance on two psychomotor tests was slightly impaired after 20 mg of midazolam, while a test of free recall was slightly improved. On most variables, 5 mg of midazolam acted like placebo, while 10 mg of midazolam was intermediate between placebo and 20 mg of midazolam. Preliminary data suggest that 20 mg of midazolam may be as efficacious in inducing sleep as 30 mg of flurazepam, but may show fewer performance decrements in the morning.

Effectiveness of a sleep disorders center: a 9-month follow-up

To assess the usefulness of a sleep disorders center the authors sent follow-up questionnaires to patients and referring physicians 9 months after each diagnostic evaluation. Findings suggest that sleep disorders centers provide a useful diagnostic service, especially for patients suffering from excessive daytime sleepiness. This problem usually has a medical etiology, and sleep laboratory evaluations seemed crucial for about two-thirds of all such patients. Insomnia was more likely to involve behavioral/psychological factors; about 30% of the patients with long-term, serious insomnia seemed to benefit markedly from the sleep center evaluation.