Comprehensive myocardial characterization using cardiac magnetic resonance associates with outcomes in low gradient severe aortic stenosis

AIMS

This study sought to compare cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characteristics according to different flow/gradient patterns of aortic stenosis (AS) and to evaluate their prognostic value in patients with low-gradient AS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This international prospective multicentric study included 147 patients with low-gradient moderate to severe AS who underwent comprehensive CMR evaluation of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), extracellular volume fraction (ECV), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). All patients were classified as followings: classical low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) [mean gradient (MG) < 40 mmHg and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%]; paradoxical LFLG [MG < 40 mmHg, LVEF ≥ 50%, and stroke volume index (SVi) < 35 ml/m2]; and normal-flow low-gradient (MG < 40 mmHg, LVEF ≥ 50%, and SVi ≥ 35 ml/m2). Patients with classical LFLG (n = 90) had more LV adverse remodelling including higher ECV, and higher LGE and volume, and worst LVGLS. Over a median follow-up of 2 years, 43 deaths and 48 composite outcomes of death or heart failure hospitalizations occurred. Risks of adverse events increased per tertile of LVGLS: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.50 [95% CI, 1.02-2.20]; P = 0.04 for mortality; HR = 1.45 [1.01-2.09]; P < 0.05 for composite outcome; per tertile of ECV, HR = 1.63 [1.07-2.49]; P = 0.02 for mortality; HR = 1.54 [1.02-2.33]; P = 0.04 for composite outcome. LGE presence also associated with higher mortality, HR = 2.27 [1.01-5.11]; P < 0.05 and composite outcome, HR = 3.00 [1.16-7.73]; P = 0.02. The risk of mortality and the composite outcome increased in proportion to the number of impaired components (i.e. LVGLS, ECV, and LGE) with multivariate adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this international prospective multicentric study of low-gradient AS, comprehensive CMR assessment provides independent prognostic value that is cumulative and incremental to clinical and echocardiographic characteristics.

Clinical Value of Stress Transaortic Flow Rate During Dobutamine Echocardiography in Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Low rest transaortic flow rate (FR) has been shown previously to predict mortality in low-gradient aortic stenosis. However limited prognostic data exists on stress FR during low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography. We aimed to assess the value of stress FR for the detection of aortic valve stenosis (AS) severity and the prediction of mortality.

METHODS

This is a multicenter cohort study of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and low-gradient aortic stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm² and mean gradient <40 mm Hg) who underwent low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography to identify the AS severity and presence of flow reserve. The outcome assessed was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 287 patients (mean age, 75±10 years; males, 71%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 31±10%) over a mean follow-up of 24±30 months there were 127 (44.3%) deaths and 147 (51.2%) patients underwent aortic valve intervention. Higher stress FR was independently associated with reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-0.99]; P=0.01) after adjusting for age, chronic kidney disease, heart failure symptoms, aortic valve intervention, and rest left ventricular ejection fraction. The minimum cutoff for prediction of mortality was stress FR 210 mL/s. Following adjustment to the same important clinical and echocardiographic parameters, among the three criteria of AS severity during stress, ie, the guideline definition of aortic valve area <1cm² and aortic valve mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or aortic valve mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or the novel definition of aortic valve area <1 cm² at stress FR ≥210 mL/s, only the latter was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.05-2.82]; P=0.03). Furthermore aortic valve area <1cm² at stress FR ≥210 mL/s was the only severe aortic stenosis criterion that was associated with improved outcome following aortic valve intervention (P<0.001). Guideline-defined stroke volume flow reserve did not predict mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress FR during low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography was useful for the detection of both AS severity and flow reserve and was associated with improved prediction of outcome following aortic valve intervention.

Impact of left ventricular fibrosis and longitudinal systolic strain on outcomes in low gradient aortic stenosis

Background

The clinical utility of comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the assessment of myocardial structure and function remains unknown in patients with low gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS).

Purpose

This study sought to compare CMR characteristics of myocardial structure and function according to different flow / gradient patterns of AS: classical low flow LG (LFLG); paradoxical LFLG; normal flow LG; and high gradient, and to evaluate their impact on the outcomes of these patients.

Methods

International multicentric prospective study included 147 patients with LG moderate to severe AS and 18 patients with high gradient severe AS who underwent comprehensive CMR evaluation of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), extracellular volume fraction (ECV), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).

Results

Patients with classical LFLG (n=90) had more LV adverse remodeling and impaired longitudinal function including higher ECV, and higher LGE and volume, and worst LVGLS, compared to other patterns of AS. Over a median follow-up of 2-years, 43 deaths and 48 composite outcomes of death or heart failure hospitalization occurred in LG AS patients. As LVGLS or ECV worsened, risks of adverse events also increased (per tertile of LVGLS: HR [95% CI] for mortality, 1.50 [1.02–2.20]; p=0.04; HR [95% CI] for composite outcome, 1.45 [1.01–2.09]; p&lt;0.05) (per tertile of ECV: HR [95% CI] for mortality, 1.63 [1.07–2.49]; p=0.02; HR [95% CI] for composite outcome, 1.54 [1.02–2.33]; p=0.04). LGE presence was also associated with higher mortality (HR [95% CI], 2.27 [1.01–5.11]; p&lt;0.05) and risk of the composite outcome (HR [95% CI], 3.00 [1.16–7.73]; p=0.02). The risk of all-cause death and of the composite outcome increased in proportion to the number of impaired components (i.e. LVGLS, ECV and LGE) (Figure) with and without adjustment for age, true severe AS, classical LFLG, and aortic valve replacement as a time-varying covariate.

Conclusions

In this international multicentric study of LG AS, comprehensive CMR assessment of myocardial structure and function provides independent prognostic value that is cumulative and incremental to clinical and echocardiographic characteristics.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare incidence and impact of measured prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM_M) versus predicted PPM (PPM_P) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

TAVR studies have used measured effective orifice area indexed (EOAi) to body surface area (BSA) to define PPM, but most SAVR series have used predicted EOAi. This difference may contribute to discrepancies in incidence and outcomes of PPM between series.

METHODS

The study analyzed SAVR patients from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2A trial and TAVR patients from the PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 Intermediate Risk registry. PPM was classified as moderate if EOAi ≤0.85 cm²/m² (≤0.70 if obese: body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) and severe if EOAi ≤0.65 cm²/m² (≤0.55 if obese). PPM_M was determined by the core lab-measured EOAi on 30-day echocardiogram. PPM_P was determined by 2 methods: 1) using normal EOA reference values previously reported for each valve model and size (PPM_P1; n = 929 SAVR, 1,069 TAVR) indexed to BSA; and 2) using normal reference EOA predicted from aortic annulus size measured by computed tomography (PPM_P2; n = 864 TAVR only) indexed to BSA. Primary endpoint was the composite of 5-year all-cause death and rehospitalization.

RESULTS

The incidence of moderate and severe PPM_P was much lower than PPM_M in both SAVR (PPM_P1: 28.4% and 1.2% vs. PPM_M: 31.0% and 23.6%) and TAVR (PPM_P1: 21.0% and 0.1% and PPM_P2: 17.0% and 0% vs. PPM_M: 27.9% and 5.7%). The incidence of severe PPM_M and severe PPM_P1 was lower in TAVR versus SAVR (P < 0.001). The presence of PPM by any method was associated with higher transprosthetic gradient. Severe PPM_P1 was independently associated with events in SAVR after adjustment for sex and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (hazard ratio: 3.18;95% CI: 1.69-5.96; P < 0.001), whereas no association was observed between PPM by any method and outcomes in TAVR.

CONCLUSIONS

EOAi measured by echocardiography results in a higher incidence of PPM following SAVR or TAVR than PPM based on predicted EOAi. Severe PPM_P is rare (<1.5%), but is associated with increased all-cause death and rehospitalization after SAVR, whereas it is absent following TAVR.

Transvalvular Flow, Sex, and Survival After Valve Replacement Surgery in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

The respective impacts of transvalvular flow, gradient, sex, and their interactions on mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the impact of pre-operative flow-gradient patterns on mortality after AVR and to examine whether there are sex differences.

METHODS

This study analyzed clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome data prospectively collected in 1,490 patients (544 women [37%]), with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent AVR.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 601 patients (40%) had normal flow (NF) with high gradient (HG), 405 (27%) NF with low gradient (LG), 246 (17%) paradoxical low flow (LF)/HG, and 238 (16%) LF/LG. During a median follow-up of 2.42 years (interquartile range: 1.04 to 4.29 years), 167 patients died. Patients with LF/HG exhibited the highest mortality after AVR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33 to 3.03; p < 0.01), which remained significant after multivariate adjustment (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.29 to 2.98; p < 0.01). Both LF/LG and NF/LG patients had comparable outcome to NF/HG (p ≥ 0.47). Optimal thresholds of stroke volume index were obtained for men (40 ml/m²) and women (32 ml/m²). Using these sex-specific cutpoints, paradoxical LF was independently associated with increased mortality in both women (adjusted HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.47; p < 0.01) and men (adjusted HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.32; p = 0.042), whereas guidelines' threshold (35 ml/m²) does not.

CONCLUSIONS

Paradoxical LF/HG was associated with higher mortality following AVR, suggesting that a reduced flow is a marker of disease severity even in patients with HG aortic stenosis. Early surgical AVR (i.e., before gradient attains 40 mm Hg) might be preferable in these patients. Furthermore, the use of sex-specific thresholds (<40 ml/m² for men and <32 ml/m² for women) to define low-flow outperforms the guidelines' threshold of 35 ml/m² in risk stratification after AVR.

Comparison of Early Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

No randomized comparison of early (ie, ≤3 months) aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus conservative management or of transcatheter AVR (TAVR) versus surgical AVR has been conducted in patients with low‐flow, low‐gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods and Results

A total of 481 consecutive patients (75±10 years; 71% men) with LFLG AS (aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm²/m² and mean gradient <40 mm Hg), 72% with classic LFLG and 28% with paradoxical LFLG, were prospectively recruited in the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. True‐severe AS or pseudo‐severe AS was adjudicated by flow‐independent criteria. During follow‐up (median [IQR] 36 [11–60] months), 220 patients died. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting to address the bias of nonrandom treatment assignment, early AVR (n=272) was associated with a major overall survival benefit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34 [95% CI, 0.24–0.50]; P<0.001). This benefit was observed in patients with true‐severe AS but also with pseudo‐severe AS (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18–0.81]; P=0.01), and in classic (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.22–0.49]; P<0.001) and paradoxical LFLG AS (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20–0.92]; P=0.03). Compared with conservative management in the conventional multivariate model, trans femoral TAVR was associated with the best survival (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.12–0.43]; P<0.001), followed by surgical AVR (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.23–0.56]; P<0.001) and alternative‐access TAVR (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.31–0.82]; P=0.007). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting model, trans femoral TAVR appeared to be superior to surgical AVR (HR [95% CI] 0.28 [0.11–0.72]; P=0.008) with regard to survival.

Conclusions

In this large prospective observational study of LFLG AS, early AVR appeared to confer a major survival benefit in both classic and paradoxical LFLG AS. This benefit seems to extend to the subgroup with pseudo‐severe AS. Our findings suggest that TAVR using femoral access might be the best strategy in these patients.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01835028.

Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease of the valve and the myocardium. A correct assessment of the valve disease severity is key to define the need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), but a better understanding of the myocardial consequences of the increased afterload is paramount to optimize the timing of the intervention. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the cornerstone of AS assessment, as it is universally available, and it allows a comprehensive structural and hemodynamic evaluation of both the aortic valve and the rest of the heart. However, it may not be sufficient as a significant proportion of patients with severe AS presents with discordant grading (i.e., an AVA ≤ 1 cm² and a mean gradient <40 mmHg) which raises uncertainty about the true severity of AS and the need for AVR. Several imaging modalities (transesophageal or stress echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography) exist that allow a detailed assessment of the stenotic aortic valve and the myocardial remodeling response. This review aims to provide an updated overview of these multimodality imaging techniques and seeks to highlight a practical approach to help clinical decision making in the challenging group of patients with discordant low-gradient AS.

Outcome of Flow-Gradient Patterns of Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement

Background:

Although aortic valve replacement is associated with a major benefit in high-gradient (HG) severe aortic stenosis (AS), the results in low-gradient (LG, mean gradient <40 mm Hg) AS are conflicting. LG severe AS may be subdivided in classical low-flow (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) and LG (CLF-LG); paradoxical low-flow (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% but stroke volume index <35 mL/m 2 ) and LG; and normal-flow (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% and stroke volume index ≥35 mL/m 2 ) and LG. The primary objective is to determine in the PARTNER 2 trial (The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) and registry the outcomes after aortic valve replacement of the 4 flow-gradient groups.

Methods:

A total of 3511 patients from the PARTNER 2 Cohort A randomized trial (n=1910) and SAPIEN 3 registry (n=1601) were included. The flow-gradient pattern was determined at baseline transthoracic echocardiography and classified as follows: (1) HG; (2) CLF-LG; (3) paradoxical low-flow-LG; and (4) normal-flow-LG. The primary end point for this analysis was the composite of (1) death; (2) rehospitalization for heart failure symptoms and valve prosthesis complication; or (3) stroke.

Results:

The distribution was HG, 2229 patients (63.5%); CLF-LG, 689 patients (19.6%); paradoxical low-flow-LG, 247 patients (7.0%); and normal-flow-LG, 346 patients (9.9%). The 2-year rate of primary end point was higher in CLF-LG (38.8%) versus HG: 31.8% ( P =0.002) and normal-flow-LG: 32.1% ( P =0.05) but was not statistically different from paradoxical low-flow-LG: 33.6% ( P =0.18). There was no significant difference in the 2-year rates of clinical events between transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in the whole cohort and within each flow-gradient group.

Conclusions:

The LG AS pattern was highly prevalent (36.5%) in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry. CLF-LG was the most common pattern of LG AS and was associated with higher rates of death, rehospitalization, or stroke at 2 years compared with the HG group. Clinical outcomes were as good in the LG AS groups with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction compared with the HG group.

Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients

Background:

This study aimed to compare echocardiographic findings in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Methods:

The PARTNER 3 trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) randomized 1000 patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk to undergo either transfemoral TAVR with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve or SAVR. Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained at baseline and at 30 days and 1 year after the procedure were analyzed by a consortium of 2 echocardiography core laboratories.

Results:

The percentage of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) was low and not statistically different between the TAVR and SAVR groups at 30 days (0.8% versus 0.2%; P =0.38). Mild AR was more frequent after TAVR than SAVR at 30 days (28.8% versus 4.2%; P <0.001). At 1 year, mean transvalvular gradient (13.7±5.6 versus 11.6±5.0 mm Hg; P =0.12) and aortic valve area (1.72±0.37 versus 1.76±0.42 cm 2 ; P =0.12) were similar in TAVR and SAVR. The percentage of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch at 30 days was low and similar between TAVR and SAVR (4.6 versus 6.3%; P =0.30). Valvulo-arterial impedance (Z va ), which reflects total left ventricular hemodynamic burden, was lower with TAVR than SAVR at 1 year (3.7±0.8 versus 3.9±0.9 mm Hg/mL/m 2 ; P <0.001). Tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion decreased and the percentage of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation increased from baseline to 1 year in SAVR but remained unchanged in TAVR. Irrespective of treatment arm, high Z va and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion, but not moderate to severe AR or severe prosthesis–patient mismatch, were associated with increased risk of the composite end point of mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year.

Conclusions:

In patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk, TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve was associated with similar percentage of moderate or severe AR compared with SAVR but higher percentage of mild AR. Transprosthetic gradients, valve areas, percentage of severe prosthesis–patient mismatch, and left ventricular mass regression were similar in TAVR and SAVR. SAVR was associated with significant deterioration of right ventricular systolic function and greater tricuspid regurgitation, which persisted at 1 year. High Z va and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion were associated with worse outcome at 1 year whereas AR and severe prosthesis–patient mismatch were not.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02675114.

Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Flow Reserve Does Not Matter Anymore

See Article by Sato et al

6097Aminoterminal proB-type natriuretic peptide: a key parameter to optimise therapeutic management of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis

Background

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and aminoterminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP) are well established surrogates of LV function impairment. However, data are scarce regarding their prognostic value to risk-stratify patients with classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS, with low left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction).

Methods

The TOPAS study is a prospective observational cohort of 240 patients with aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2, mean gradient<40 mmHg and LVEF<50%. True severe AS was adjudicated using flow independent grading schemes.

Results

BNP significantly predicted one-year (area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve [AUC]) 0.62±0.04, p=0.026) but not three-year mortality. After adjustment for the severity of AS, initial treatment (aortic valve replacement [AVR] vs. conservative management [ConsRx]), age, sex and the EuroSCORE (Model#1), BNP-ratio>550 pg/ml had a trend to predict time to death (HR=2.14 [1.00–4.58], p=0.05). In contrast, NT-proBNP ratio significantly predicted both one and three-year mortality (AUC=0.67±0.04 and 0.66±0.05, both p=0.001), and independently predicted time to death (HR=1.39 per 1 unit of Log transformed NT-proBNP [1.11–1.74], p=0.004). In a head-to-head comparison (108 patients with both biomarkers), the AUCs to predict one and thre-year mortality were significantly higher with NT-proBNP versus BNP (p<0.009). NT-proBNP but not BNP independently predicted mortality and significantly improved Model#1 (Likelihood ratio test Chi2=15.95, p<0.001). The category-free net reclassification index of NT-proBNP was 0.71 (p=0.008) versus 0.38 (p=0.15) for BNP. Furthermore, there was a marked survival benefit associated with AVR in patients with NT-proBNP ≥1700 pg/ml (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) associated to AVR vs conservative management=0.52 [0.31–0.85], p=0.009), while those<1700 pg/ml had excellent one-year survival under ConsRx (only one death [4.5±4.4%] at one year as compared to 23 [37±6.2%] for ConsRx-NTproBNP>1700, aHR=0.11 [0.01–0.83], p=0.033). The survival benefit associated with AVR interacted with NT-proBNP (p<0.001) but not with true or pseudosevere AS (p=0.53 for interaction), suggesting that NT-proBNP might identify moderate AS patients but sufficiently severe valvulo-ventricular disease to justify AVR.

Survival according to NT-proBNP and AVR

Conclusion

NT-proBNP appears to be an excellent biomarker for the clinical purpose of risk-stratifying classical LFLG-AS. A threshold of 1700 pg/ml i.e. close to the diagnostic threshold for heart failure in acute dyspnea, was a strong independent determinant of the survival benefit associated with aortic valve replacement. Our findings suggest that NT-proBNP should be preferred over BNP.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research

6099Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcomes of patients with low-flow, low-gradient moderate aortic stenosis

Background

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) and true-severe aortic stenosis (TSAS). However, there is very few data on the potential benefit of AVR in patients with LFLG pseudo-severe (i.e. moderate) AS (PSAS).

Methods

Consecutive patients with aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm2/m2, mean gradient <40 mmHg were prospectively recruited in a multicenter observational cohort study. The patients were categorized in TSAS vs. PSAS using previously reported thresholds of flow-independent parameters of AS severity (projected valve area at normal flow rate ≤1.0 cm2 and/or aortic valve calcium score by CT >1200 AU in women and >2000 AU in men). To account for between-treatment-group differences, inverse probability-of-treatment weighting was combined to Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Among the 430 patients included in this study, 297 (69%) were classified as TSAS and 274 (57%) underwent AVR. Of note, 21% of the patients treated by AVR were classified as PSAS. In patients managed conservatively (ConsRx), 52% had PSAS and 48% TSAS. During a median follow-up of 28 months [8–60], 198 patients died. The adjusted weighted hazard ratio (awHR) of death associated with AVR as compared to ConsRx was 0.42 [0.24–0.73] (p<0.0001, Figure1-Panel-A). This survival benefit associated with AVR was observed not only in patients with TSAS but also in those with PSAS (awHR: 0.29 [0.12–0.70]; p=0.006, Figure1-Panel-B).

Figure 1

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that AVR is associated with a survival benefit not only in LFLG patients with TSAS but also in those with PSAS. Randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of AVR in patients with moderate AS and depressed LV systolic function.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research

Impact of Metabolic Syndrome and/or Diabetes Mellitus on Left Ventricular Mass and Remodeling in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Before and After Aortic Valve Replacement

In aortic stenosis (AS), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and diabetes mellitus (DM) are associated with more pronounced left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and more concentric remodeling. We aimed to assess the impact of MetS and DM on LV mass, remodeling, and LV mass regression after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe AS. We included 177 patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction (>50%). All patients underwent a complete echocardiogram before and 1 year after AVR. Forty-seven (27%) patients had MetS, 37 (21%) DM, and 93 (52%) neither MetS nor DM (No MetS-DM). Before AVR, indexed LV mass was higher in MetS and DM groups compared with No MetS-DM group (56.1 ± 14.2, 56.2 ± 18.2 vs 49.2 ± 14.1 g/m^2.7, respectively; p <0.01). Prevalence of LV hypertrophy was higher in MetS and DM than in No MetS-DM patients (66%, 65% vs 44%, p <0.01) as well as LV mass to end-diastolic volume ratio (2.10 ± 0.44 and 2.21 ± 0.63 vs 1.96 ± 0.41 g/ml, respectively, p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis, DM and MetS were independently associated with higher baseline LV mass (p <0.05). One year after AVR, decrease in LV mass was significant (p <0.001) in all 3 groups. MetS was independently associated with less LV mass regression and higher LV mass 1 year after AVR. Therefore, MetS and DM patients showed more residual LV hypertrophy than those with No MetS-DM (57%, 38%, and 17%, p <0.01). In conclusion, MetS and DM were associated with higher preoperative LV mass, more LV hypertrophy, and more concentric remodeling. One year after AVR, MetS showed less significant LV mass regression and both DM and MetS persisted with more residual LV hypertrophy.