1
|
Bateman M, Skeggs A, Whitby E, Fletcher-Barrett V, Stephens G, Dawes M, Davis D, Beckhelling J, Cooper K, Saunders B, Littlewood C, Vicenzino B, Foster NE, Hill JC. Optimising physiotherapy for people with lateral elbow tendinopathy - Results of a mixed-methods pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial (OPTimisE). Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 69:102905. [PMID: 38194841 PMCID: PMC10843168 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The OPTimisE intervention was developed to address uncertainty regarding the most effective physiotherapy treatment strategy for people with Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET). OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility of conducting a fully-powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating whether the OPTimisE intervention is superior to usual physiotherapy treatment for adults with LET. DESIGN A mixed-methods multi-centred, parallel pilot and feasibility RCT, conducted in three outpatient physiotherapy departments in the UK. METHOD Patients were independently randomised 1:1 in mixed blocks, stratified by site, to the OPTimisE intervention or usual care. Outcomes were assessed using pre-defined feasibility progression criteria. RESULTS 50 patients were randomised (22 Female, 28 Male), mean age 48 years (range 27-75). Consent rate was 71% (50/70), fidelity to intervention 89% (16/18), attendance rate in the OPTimisE group 82% (55/67) vs 85% (56/66) in usual care, outcome measure completion 81% (39/48) at six-month follow-up. There were no related adverse events. Patients and physiotherapists reported that the OPTimisE intervention was acceptable but suggested improvements to the trial design. 49 patients were recruited from physiotherapy referrals vs one from primary care records. Outcome measure return rates were higher when completed online (74%) compared to postal questionnaire (50%). Exploratory analysis showed improvements in both groups over time. CONCLUSIONS It is methodologically feasible to conduct a fully powered RCT comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the OPTimisE intervention versus usual physiotherapy treatment. Considering the similar improvements observed in both groups, careful consideration is needed regarding the priority research question to be addressed in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bateman
- University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK; School of Medicine, Keele University, UK.
| | - A Skeggs
- Derby Clinical Trials Support Unit, Derby, UK
| | - E Whitby
- University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | | | - G Stephens
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Dawes
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Davis
- Derby Clinical Trials Support Unit, Derby, UK
| | | | - K Cooper
- Patient Representative, Derby, UK
| | - B Saunders
- School of Medicine, Keele University, UK
| | | | - B Vicenzino
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N E Foster
- School of Medicine, Keele University, UK; STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J C Hill
- School of Medicine, Keele University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sarigiovannis P, Foster NE, Jowett S, Saunders B. Delegation of workload from musculoskeletal physiotherapists to physiotherapy assistants/support workers: A UK online survey. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62:102631. [PMID: 35964497 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are approximately 9000 physiotherapy assistants/support workers in the UK. Many of them work in NHS physiotherapy outpatient services treating patients with musculoskeletal conditions, but their role(s) are relatively undefined and as such there is considerable variation in the duties and tasks they undertake. This study aimed to explore current practice of UK musculoskeletal physiotherapists in relation to delegation to physiotherapy assistants/support workers. METHODS An online cross-sectional descriptive survey was designed and collected data on delegation practice and training in delegation. The survey was piloted with 10 physiotherapists. The final questionnaire was distributed via the interactive Chartered Society of Physiotherapy's website and the authors' professional networks via Twitter. Responses were collected over a five-week-period from October to November 2020. RESULTS Of 302 survey responses, 232 were analysed (46 incomplete, 24 ineligible). The majority of respondents (66.3%, 154/232) had worked as physiotherapists for over 10 years. Most respondents indicated they had neither formal training (84%, 195/232) nor informal training (60.3%, 140/232) regarding how to delegate tasks. The clinical tasks most commonly delegated by physiotherapists were supervision of exercises (81.0%, 188/232) and walking aid provision (78.5%, 182/232) whereas the least delegated clinical task was the application of electrotherapy (19.8%, 46/232). CONCLUSION These survey results provide evidence for the need to improve training in delegation for both physiotherapists and physiotherapy assistants, and to ensure clearer delegation processes to facilitate good delegation practice in the musculoskeletal setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sarigiovannis
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom; Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 1QG, United Kingdom.
| | - N E Foster
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom; STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Brisbane, Australia
| | - S Jowett
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - B Saunders
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bateman M, Saunders B, Littlewood C, Davis D, Beckhelling J, Cooper K, Skeggs A, Foster NE, Vicenzino B, Hill JC. Comparing an optimised physiotherapy treatment package with usual physiotherapy care for people with tennis elbow - protocol for the OPTimisE pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:178. [PMID: 35953842 PMCID: PMC9367116 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01132-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physiotherapy is recommended for people with tennis elbow, but whilst a wide array of treatments is available, the optimal approach remains uncertain. We have therefore recently developed an optimised physiotherapy treatment package for tennis elbow based on a synthesis of the evidence, patient input and clinical consensus. It consists of detailed advice and education, a structured progressive exercise programme and provision of a counter-force elbow brace. Here, we report the protocol for our multicentre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to (a) examine the feasibility of our optimised physiotherapy treatment package and (b) to pilot trial processes for a future fully powered RCT to test clinical and cost-effectiveness compared with usual physiotherapy treatment. METHODS A multicentre pilot and feasibility RCT will be conducted across three sites in England, recruiting up to 50 patients (or for a maximum of 12 months). Participants with tennis elbow, identified from physiotherapy clinic waiting lists and general practice surgeries, will be randomly allocated to receive the optimised physiotherapy treatment package or usual physiotherapy care. Analysis will focus on feasibility measures including consent rate, intervention fidelity, follow-up rate and outcome completion rate. A nested qualitative study will explore the acceptability of the study processes and patient and physiotherapist experiences of the new optimised intervention. DISCUSSION This study will determine the feasibility of a new optimised physiotherapy treatment package for people with tennis elbow and pilot the processes for a future fully powered RCT. In the longer term, this treatment package may provide superior clinical outcomes for patients, in terms of pain and quality of life, and be more cost-effective for the health service. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered with the ISRCTN database 19/7/2021, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN64444585.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bateman
- University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK. .,School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
| | - B Saunders
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - C Littlewood
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - D Davis
- Derby Clinical Trials Support Unit , Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - J Beckhelling
- Derby Clinical Trials Support Unit , Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - K Cooper
- Patient Representative, Derby, UK
| | - A Skeggs
- Derby Clinical Trials Support Unit , Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - N E Foster
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.,STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Australia
| | - B Vicenzino
- School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J C Hill
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lambe K, Guerra S, Salazar de Pablo G, Ayis S, Cameron ID, Foster NE, Godfrey E, Gregson CL, Martin FC, Sackley C, Walsh N, Sheehan KJ. Effect of inpatient rehabilitation treatment ingredients on functioning, quality of life, length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality among older adults with unplanned admission: an overview review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:501. [PMID: 35689181 PMCID: PMC9188066 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03169-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To synthesise the evidence for the effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation treatment ingredients (versus any comparison) on functioning, quality of life, length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality among older adults with an unplanned hospital admission. METHODS A systematic search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, PEDro, BASE, and OpenGrey for published and unpublished systematic reviews of inpatient rehabilitation interventions for older adults following an unplanned admission to hospital from database inception to December 2020. Duplicate screening for eligibility, quality assessment, and data extraction including extraction of treatment components and their respective ingredients employing the Treatment Theory framework. Random effects meta-analyses were completed overall and by treatment ingredient. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the inconsistency-value (I2). RESULTS Systematic reviews (n = 12) of moderate to low quality, including 44 non-overlapping relevant RCTs were included. When incorporated in a rehabilitation intervention, there was a large effect of endurance exercise, early intervention and shaping knowledge on walking endurance after the inpatient stay versus comparison. Early intervention, repeated practice activities, goals and planning, increased medical care and/or discharge planning increased the likelihood of discharge home versus comparison. The evidence for activities of daily living (ADL) was conflicting. Rehabilitation interventions were not effective for functional mobility, strength, or quality of life, or reduce length of stay or mortality. Therefore, we did not explore the potential role of treatment ingredients for these outcomes. CONCLUSION Benefits observed were often for subgroups of the older adult population e.g., endurance exercise was effective for endurance in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and early intervention was effective for endurance for those with hip fracture. Future research should determine whether the effectiveness of these treatment ingredients observed in subgroups, are generalisable to older adults more broadly. There is a need for more transparent reporting of intervention components and ingredients according to established frameworks to enable future synthesis and/or replication. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO Registration CRD42018114323 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Lambe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - S Guerra
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - G Salazar de Pablo
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - I D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - N E Foster
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Queensland, Australia
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - E Godfrey
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - F C Martin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - C Sackley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - N Walsh
- Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - K J Sheehan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hall M, van der Esch M, Hinman RS, Peat G, de Zwart A, Quicke JG, Runhaar J, Knoop J, van der Leeden M, de Rooij M, Meulenbelt I, Vliet Vlieland T, Lems WF, Holden MA, Foster NE, Bennell KL. How does hip osteoarthritis differ from knee osteoarthritis? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30:32-41. [PMID: 34600121 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are leading causes of global disability. Most research to date has focused on the knee, with results often extrapolated to the hip, and this extends to treatment recommendations in clinical guidelines. Extrapolating results from research on knee OA may limit our understanding of disease characteristics specific to hip OA, thereby constraining development and implementation of effective treatments. This review highlights differences between hip and knee OA with respect to prevalence, prognosis, epigenetics, pathophysiology, anatomical and biomechanical factors, clinical presentation, pain and non-surgical treatment recommendations and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hall
- Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - M van der Esch
- Reade, Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R S Hinman
- Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - G Peat
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, UK
| | - A de Zwart
- Reade, Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J G Quicke
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, UK
| | - J Runhaar
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Knoop
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van der Leeden
- Reade, Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M de Rooij
- Reade, Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - W F Lems
- Reade, Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M A Holden
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, UK; STARS Research and Education Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
| | - K L Bennell
- Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stynes S, Jordan KP, Hill JC, Wynne-Jones G, Cottrell E, Foster NE, Goodwin R, Bishop A. Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: patient characteristics and outcomes. Physiotherapy 2021; 113:199-208. [PMID: 34656297 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) is a primary care model where expert musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapists undertake the first patient consultation, to enhance MSK-patient care and free-up GP capacity. The authors report the quantitative findings from the FCP National Evaluation (Phase 3) which evaluated the FCP model against success criteria. DESIGN AND SETTING A mixed-methods 24-month service evaluation involving 40 FCP sites and 240 FCPs across England. METHODS An online platform collected patient-reported experience and outcomes following the FCP consultation and at 1, 2 and 3-months follow-up. These included the Keele STarT MSK Tool, pain intensity (0-10 NRS scale), Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ, range 0-56), and Friends-and-Family Test. RESULTS Over 13 months, 2825 patients were invited by email and 24% (n=680) completed their initial questionnaire. Their mean age was 56.2 (SD 14.9), 61% were female, ethnicity was 97% white, mean pain intensity was 6.1 (SD 2.13) and mean MSK-HQ score was 33.8 (SD 9.5). At 3-months follow-up (n=370) there was a 2.8 (CI 2.5 to 3.1) mean pain intensity reduction from baseline, a mean 7.1 (6.0 to 8.2) score improvement in MSK-HQ and 64% reporting overall improvement (much better/better) since seeing the FCP. One of the six success criteria was not met; 29% of those in employment reported receiving specific work advice from the FCP (target ≥75%). CONCLUSION Ahead of the planned scale-up of the FCP primary care model across the UK, this evaluation provides useful data on patients who access this service, their short-term clinical outcomes and whether key success criteria are being met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Stynes
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele, United Kingdom; Midlands Partnership Foundation NHS Trust, Haywood Hospital Spinal Interface Service, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
| | - K P Jordan
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele, United Kingdom.
| | - J C Hill
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele, United Kingdom.
| | - G Wynne-Jones
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele, United Kingdom.
| | - E Cottrell
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele, United Kingdom.
| | - N E Foster
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele, United Kingdom; Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
| | - R Goodwin
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
| | - A Bishop
- Keele University, School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Realpe AX, Foster NE, Dickenson EJ, Jepson M, Griffin DR, Donovan JL. Patient experiences of receiving arthroscopic surgery or personalised hip therapy for femoroacetabular impingement in the context of the UK fashion study: a qualitative study. Trials 2021; 22:211. [PMID: 33726810 PMCID: PMC7962311 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05151-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND UK FASHIoN was a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing hip arthroscopic surgery (HA) with personalised hip therapy (PHT, physiotherapist-led conservative care), for patients with hip pain attributed to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. Our aim was to describe the treatment and trial participation experiences of patients, to contextualise the trial results and offer further information to assist treatment decision-making in FAI. METHODS We conducted in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of trial participants from each of the trial arms. They were interviewed after they received treatment and completed their first year of trial participation. Thematic analysis and constant comparison analytical approaches were used to identify themes of patient treatment experiences during the trial. RESULTS Forty trial participants were interviewed in this qualitative study. Their baseline characteristics were similar to those in the main trial sample. On average, their hip-related quality of life (iHOT-33 scores) at 12 months follow-up were lower than average for all trial participants, indicating poorer hip-related quality of life as a consequence of theoretical sampling. Patient experiences occurred in five patient groups: those who felt their symptoms improved with hip arthroscopy, or with personal hip therapy, patients who felt their hip symptoms did not change with PHT but did not want HA, patients who decided to change from PHT to HA and a group who experienced serious complications after HA. Interviewees mostly described a trouble-free, enriching and altruistic trial participation experience, although most participants expected more clinical follow-up at the end of the trial. CONCLUSION Both HA and PHT were experienced as beneficial by participants in the trial. Treatment success appeared to depend partly on patients' prior own expectations as well as their outcomes, and future research is needed to explore this further. Findings from this study can be combined with the primary results to inform future FAI patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Arthroscopic surgery for hip impingement versus best conventional care ( ISRCTN64081839 ). 28/02/2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A X Realpe
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall 4.07, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - N E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - E J Dickenson
- University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - M Jepson
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall 4.07, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - D R Griffin
- University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - J L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall 4.07, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hill JC, Garvin S, Chen Y, Cooper V, Wathall S, Saunders B, Lewis M, Protheroe J, Chudyk A, Dunn KM, Hay E, van der Windt D, Mallen C, Foster NE. Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2020; 21:30. [PMID: 32046647 PMCID: PMC7014664 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-1074-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain from the five most common presentations to primary care (back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain), where the majority of patients are managed, is a costly global health challenge. At present, first-line decision-making is based on clinical reasoning and stratified models of care have only been tested in patients with low back pain. We therefore, examined the feasibility of; a) a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), and b) General Practitioners (GPs) providing stratified care at the point-of-consultation for these five most common MSK pain presentations. METHODS The design was a pragmatic pilot, two parallel-arm (stratified versus non-stratified care), cluster RCT and the setting was 8 UK GP practices (4 intervention, 4 control) with randomisation (stratified by practice size) and blinding of trial statistician and outcome data-collectors. Participants were adult consulters with MSK pain without indicators of serious pathologies, urgent medical needs, or vulnerabilities. Potential participant records were tagged and individuals sent postal invitations using a GP point-of-consultation electronic medical record (EMR) template. The intervention was supported by the EMR template housing the Keele STarT MSK Tool (to stratify into low, medium and high-risk prognostic subgroups of persistent pain and disability) and recommended matched treatment options. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of recruitment and follow-up rates, selection bias, and GP intervention fidelity. To capture recommended outcomes including pain and function, participants completed an initial questionnaire, brief monthly questionnaire (postal or SMS), and 6-month follow-up questionnaire. An anonymised EMR audit described GP decision-making. RESULTS GPs screened 3063 patients (intervention = 1591, control = 1472), completed the EMR template with 1237 eligible patients (intervention = 513, control = 724) and 524 participants (42%) consented to data collection (intervention = 231, control = 293). Recruitment took 28 weeks (target 12 weeks) with > 90% follow-up retention (target > 75%). We detected no selection bias of concern and no harms identified. GP stratification tool fidelity failed to achieve a-priori success criteria, whilst fidelity to the matched treatments achieved "complete success". CONCLUSIONS A future definitive cluster RCT of stratified care for MSK pain is feasible and is underway, following key amendments including a clinician-completed version of the stratification tool and refinements to recommended matched treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION Name of the registry: ISRCTN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 15366334. Date of registration: 06/04/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Hill
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
| | - S Garvin
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Y Chen
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK
| | - V Cooper
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - S Wathall
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK
| | - B Saunders
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - M Lewis
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK
| | - J Protheroe
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - A Chudyk
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - K M Dunn
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - E Hay
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - D van der Windt
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - C Mallen
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Traynor JM, Doyle-Thomas KAR, Hanford LC, Foster NE, Tryfon A, Hyde KL, Anagnostou E, Evans AC, Zwaigenbaum L, Hall GBC. Indices of repetitive behaviour are correlated with patterns of intrinsic functional connectivity in youth with autism spectrum disorder. Brain Res 2018; 1685:79-90. [PMID: 29453959 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to examine how repetitive behaviour in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is related to intrinsic functional connectivity patterns in a number of large-scale, neural networks. Resting-state fMRI scans from thirty subjects with ASD and thirty-two age-matched, typically developing control subjects were analysed. Seed-to-voxel and ROI-to-ROI functional connectivity analyses were used to examine resting-state connectivity in a number of cortical and subcortical neural networks. Bivariate correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between repetitive behaviour scores from the Repetitive Behaviour Scale - Revised and intrinsic functional connectivity in ASD subjects. Compared to control subjects, ASD subjects displayed marked over-connectivity of the thalamus with several cortical sensory processing areas, as well as over-connectivity of the basal ganglia with somatosensory and motor cortices. Within the ASD group, significant correlations were found between functional connectivity patterns and total RBS-R scores as well as one principal component analysis-derived score from the RBS-R. These results suggest that thalamocortical resting-state connectivity is altered in individuals with ASD, and that resting-state functional connectivity is associated with ASD symptomatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Traynor
- McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - K A R Doyle-Thomas
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - L C Hanford
- McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - N E Foster
- International Laboratory for Brain Music and Sound (BRAMS), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - A Tryfon
- International Laboratory for Brain Music and Sound (BRAMS), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - K L Hyde
- International Laboratory for Brain Music and Sound (BRAMS), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - E Anagnostou
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A C Evans
- Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - L Zwaigenbaum
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - G B C Hall
- McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Healey EL, Jinks C, Foster NE, Chew-Graham CA, Pincus T, Hartshorne L, Cooke K, Nicholls E, Proctor J, Lewis M, Dent S, Wathall S, Hay EM, McBeth J. The feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity intervention for older people with chronic musculoskeletal pain: The iPOPP pilot trial protocol. Musculoskeletal Care 2017; 16:118-132. [PMID: 29218808 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This pilot trial will inform the design and methods of a future full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) and examine the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of the Increasing Physical activity in Older People with chronic Pain (iPOPP) intervention, a healthcare assistant (HCA)-supported intervention to promote walking in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain in a primary care setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The iPOPP study is an individually randomized, multicentre, three-parallel-arm pilot RCT. A total of 150 participants aged ≥65 years with chronic pain in one or more index sites will be recruited and randomized using random permuted blocks, stratified by general practice, to: (i) usual care plus written information; (ii) pedometer plus usual care and written information; or (iii) the iPOPP intervention. A theoretically informed mixed-methods approach will be employed using semi-structured interviews, audio recordings of the HCA consultations, self-reported questionnaires, case report forms and objective physical activity data collection (accelerometry). Follow-up will be conducted 12 weeks post-randomization. Collection of the quantitative data and statistical analysis will be performed blinded to treatment allocation, and analysis will be exploratory to inform the design and methods of a future RCT. Analysis of the HCA consultation recordings will focus on the use of a checklist to determine the fidelity of the iPOPP intervention delivery, and the interview data will be analysed using a constant comparison approach in order to generate conceptual themes focused around the acceptability and feasibility of the trial, and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework to understand barriers and facilitators to behaviour change. A triangulation protocol will be used to integrate quantitative and qualitative data and findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E L Healey
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - C Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - C A Chew-Graham
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - T Pincus
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.,Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
| | - L Hartshorne
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - K Cooke
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - E Nicholls
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - J Proctor
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - M Lewis
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - S Dent
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - S Wathall
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - E M Hay
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - J McBeth
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salt E, van der Windt DA, Chesterton L, Mainwaring F, Ashwood N, Foster NE. Physiotherapist-led suprascapular nerve blocks for persistent shoulder pain: Evaluation of a new service in the UK. Musculoskeletal Care 2017; 16:214-221. [PMID: 28703390 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This service evaluation explored and reported findings from a new physiotherapist-led service offering suprascapular nerve blocks (SSNBs) to patients with persistent shoulder pain. METHODS We collected data before the SSNB injection and at the 6-weeks and 6-month follow-up from consecutive patients with persistent shoulder pain being treated by physiotherapists or an anaesthetist. Outcomes were patient-reported pain (numerical rating scale [NRS 0 to 10]), patient-specific functional score (PSFS) and health-related quality of life [the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D-5 L)]. Exploratory analyses compared baseline and follow-up scores within each clinician delivery group (physiotherapists, anaesthetist). RESULTS Forty patients (mean age 57 years [standard deviation {SD} 12]; 63% female) received an SSNB from a physiotherapist, eight patients (mean age 59 years [SD 11]; female 88%) received an SSNB from an anaesthetist. At the 6-week follow-up, the physiotherapy group showed a mean reduction in pain (on the NRS): 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 3.0) and an improvement in function (on the PSFS): -1.3 (95% CI -1.9 to -0.4). Similar changes were found in those treated by the anaesthetist (pain: 1.3 [95% CI -1.18 to 3.80]; function: -1.4 (95% CI -3.18 to 0.35]). Very small changes, that were not statistically significant, were found in EQ5D-5 L scores. At the 6-month follow-up, the mean reduction in pain (NRS) was maintained at 2.0 (95% CI 0.99 to 2.95) for the physiotherapy group. CONCLUSION The results provide early, exploratory evidence that patients with persistent shoulder pain treated by physiotherapists using palpation-guided SSNBs achieve clinically important changes in pain and function in the short and medium term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Salt
- Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Burton on Trent, UK
| | - D A van der Windt
- Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - L Chesterton
- Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - F Mainwaring
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Burton on Trent, UK
| | - N Ashwood
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Burton on Trent, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
MacPherson H, Vertosick EA, Foster NE, Lewith G, Linde K, Sherman KJ, Witt CM, Vickers AJ. The persistence of the effects of acupuncture after a course of treatment: a meta-analysis of patients with chronic pain. Pain 2017; 158:784-793. [PMID: 27764035 PMCID: PMC5393924 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
There is uncertainty regarding how long the effects of acupuncture treatment persist after a course of treatment. We aimed to determine the trajectory of pain scores over time after acupuncture, using a large individual patient data set from high-quality randomized trials of acupuncture for chronic pain. The available individual patient data set included 29 trials and 17,922 patients. The chronic pain conditions included musculoskeletal pain (low back, neck, and shoulder), osteoarthritis of the knee, and headache/migraine. We used meta-analytic techniques to determine the trajectory of posttreatment pain scores. Data on longer term follow-up were available for 20 trials, including 6376 patients. In trials comparing acupuncture to no acupuncture control (wait-list, usual care, etc), effect sizes diminished by a nonsignificant 0.011 SD per 3 months (95% confidence interval: -0.014 to 0.037, P = 0.4) after treatment ended. The central estimate suggests that approximately 90% of the benefit of acupuncture relative to controls would be sustained at 12 months. For trials comparing acupuncture to sham, we observed a reduction in effect size of 0.025 SD per 3 months (95% confidence interval: 0.000-0.050, P = 0.050), suggesting approximately a 50% diminution at 12 months. The effects of a course of acupuncture treatment for patients with chronic pain do not seem to decrease importantly over 12 months. Patients can generally be reassured that treatment effects persist. Studies of the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture should take our findings into account when considering the time horizon of acupuncture effects. Further research should measure longer term outcomes of acupuncture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H MacPherson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
| | - EA Vertosick
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - NE Foster
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - G Lewith
- University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - K Linde
- Institute of General Practice, Technische Universität München, Germany
| | - KJ Sherman
- Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - CM Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - AJ Vickers
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hill JC, Afolabi EK, Lewis M, Dunn KM, Roddy E, van der Windt DA, Foster NE. Does a modified STarT Back Tool predict outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients than back pain? A secondary analysis of cohort data. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012445. [PMID: 27742627 PMCID: PMC5073547 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The STarT Back Tool has good predictive performance for non-specific low back pain in primary care. We therefore aimed to investigate whether a modified STarT Back Tool predicted outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients, and assessed the consequences of using existing risk-group cut-points across different pain regions. SETTING Secondary analysis of prospective data from 2 cohorts: (1) outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy services (PhysioDirect trial n=1887) and (2) musculoskeletal primary-secondary care interface services (SAMBA study n=1082). PARTICIPANTS Patients with back, neck, upper limb, lower limb or multisite pain with a completed modified STarT Back Tool (baseline) and 6-month physical health outcome (Short Form 36 (SF-36)). OUTCOMES Area under the receiving operator curve (AUCs) tested discriminative abilities of the tool's baseline score for identifying poor 6-month outcome (SF-36 lower tertile Physical Component Score). Risk-group cut-points were tested using sensitivity and specificity for identifying poor outcome using (1) Youden's J statistic and (2) a clinically determined rule that specificity should not fall below 0.7 (false-positive rate <30%). RESULTS In PhysioDirect and SAMBA, poor 6-month physical health was 18.5% and 28.2%, respectively. Modified STarT Back Tool score AUCs for predicting outcome in back pain were 0.72 and 0.79, neck 0.82 and 0.88, upper limb 0.79 and 0.86, lower limb 0.77 and 0.83, and multisite pain 0.83 and 0.82 in PhysioDirect and SAMBA, respectively. Differences between pain region AUCs were non-significant. Optimal cut-points to discriminate low-risk and medium-risk/high-risk groups depended on pain region and clinical services. CONCLUSIONS A modified STarT Back Tool similarly predicts 6-month physical health outcome across 5 musculoskeletal pain regions. However, the use of consistent risk-group cut-points was not possible and resulted in poor sensitivity (too many with long-term disability being missed) or specificity (too many with good outcome inaccurately classified as 'at risk') for some pain regions. The draft tool is now being refined and validated within a new programme of research for a broader musculoskeletal population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN55666618; Post results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Hill
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - E K Afolabi
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - M Lewis
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - K M Dunn
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - E Roddy
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - D A van der Windt
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, Wall PDH, Donovan JL, Foster NE, Hutchinson CE, Parsons N, Petrou S, Realpe A, Achten J, Achana F, Adams A, Costa ML, Griffin J, Hobson R, Smith J. Protocol for a multicentre, parallel-arm, 12-month, randomised, controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery versus conservative care for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FASHIoN). BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012453. [PMID: 27580837 PMCID: PMC5013508 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is a recognised cause of young adult hip pain. There has been a large increase in the number of patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for FAI; however, a recent Cochrane review highlighted that there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating treatment effectiveness. We aim to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery versus best conservative care for patients with FAI syndrome. METHODS We will conduct a multicentre, pragmatic, assessor-blinded, two parallel arm, RCT comparing arthroscopic surgery to physiotherapy-led best conservative care. 24 hospitals treating NHS patients will recruit 344 patients over a 26-month recruitment period. Symptomatic adults with radiographic signs of FAI morphology who are considered suitable for arthroscopic surgery by their surgeon will be eligible. Patients will be excluded if they have radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis, previous significant hip pathology or previous shape changing surgery. Participants will be allocated in a ratio of 1:1 to receive arthroscopic surgery or conservative care. Recruitment will be monitored and supported by qualitative intervention to optimise informed consent and recruitment. The primary outcome will be pain and function assessed by the international hip outcome tool 33 (iHOT-33) measured 1-year following randomisation. Secondary outcomes include general health (short form 12), quality of life (EQ5D-5L) and patient satisfaction. The primary analysis will compare change in pain and function (iHOT-33) at 12 months between the treatment groups, on an intention-to-treat basis, presented as the mean difference between the trial groups with 95% CIs. The study is funded by the Health Technology Assessment Programme (13/103/02). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is granted by the Edgbaston Research Ethics committee (14/WM/0124). The results will be disseminated through open access peer-reviewed publications, including Health Technology Assessment, and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN64081839; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D R Griffin
- University of Warwick, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - E J Dickenson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - P D H Wall
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J L Donovan
- University of Bristol, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences NIHR, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - C E Hutchinson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - N Parsons
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - S Petrou
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - A Realpe
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Achten
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - F Achana
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - A Adams
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - M L Costa
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Griffin
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - R Hobson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Smith
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Quicke JG, Foster NE, Thomas MJ, Holden MA. Is long-term physical activity safe for older adults with knee pain?: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23:1445-56. [PMID: 26003947 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2014] [Revised: 04/24/2015] [Accepted: 05/10/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether long-term physical activity is safe for older adults with knee pain. DESIGN A comprehensive systematic review and narrative synthesis of existing literature was conducted using multiple electronic databases from inception until May 2013. Two reviewers independently screened, checked data extraction and carried out quality assessment. Inclusion criteria for study designs were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies or case control studies, which included adults of mean age over 45 years old with knee pain or osteoarthritis (OA), undertaking physical activity over at least 3 months and which measured a safety related outcome (adverse events, pain, physical functioning, structural OA imaging progression or progression to total knee replacement (TKR)). RESULTS Of the 8614 unique references identified, 49 studies were included in the review, comprising 48 RCTs and one case control study. RCTs varied in quality and included an array of low impact therapeutic exercise interventions of varying cardiovascular intensity. There was no evidence of serious adverse events, increases in pain, decreases in physical function, progression of structural OA on imaging or increased TKR at group level. The case control study concluded that increasing levels of regular physical activity was associated with lower risk of progression to TKR. CONCLUSIONS Long-term therapeutic exercise lasting 3 to 30 months is safe for most older adults with knee pain. This evidence supports current clinical guideline recommendations. However, most studies investigated selected, consenting older adults carrying out low impact therapeutic exercise which may affect result generalizability. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014006913.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G Quicke
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
| | - N E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
| | - M J Thomas
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
| | - M A Holden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lewis M, Wynne-Jones G, Barton P, Whitehurst DGT, Wathall S, Foster NE, Hay EM, van der Windt D. Should General Practitioners Issue a Sick Certificate to Employees Who Consult for Low Back Pain in Primary Care? J Occup Rehabil 2015; 25:577-88. [PMID: 25595331 PMCID: PMC4540785 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9564-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Back pain is a common problem and has significant societal impact. Sickness certification is commonly issued to patients consulting their general practitioner with low back pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of certification for low back pain with clinical outcomes and cost consequences. METHODS A prospective cohort study using linked questionnaire and medical record data from 806 low back pain patients in 8 UK general practices: comparison of 116 (14.4%) who received a sickness certificate versus 690 who did not receive certification. The primary clinical measure was the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Data on back pain consultation and work absenteeism were used to calculate healthcare and societal costs. RESULTS Participants issued a sickness certificate had higher back-related disability at baseline consultation and 6-month follow-up [mean difference 3.1 (95% CI 1.8, 4.4) on the RMDQ], indicating worse health status. After fully adjusting for baseline differences, most changes in clinical outcomes at 6 months were not significantly different between study groups. Productivity losses were significantly higher for the certification group, with most absence occurring after the expected end of certification; mean difference in costs due to absenteeism over 6 months was £1,956 (95% CI £941, £3040). CONCLUSIONS There was no clear evidence of a difference in clinical outcomes between individuals issued a sickness certificate and those not issued a certification for their back pain. With little overall contrast in clinical outcomes, policy makers and care providers may wish to draw on the likely difference in societal costs alongside issues in ethical and moral care in their consideration of patient care for low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Lewis
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - G. Wynne-Jones
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - P. Barton
- Health Economics, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - D. G. T. Whitehurst
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6 Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
| | - S. Wathall
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - N. E. Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - E. M. Hay
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| | - D. van der Windt
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Allen KD, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Foster NE, Golightly YM, Hawker G. OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Design and conduct of implementation trials of interventions for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23:826-38. [PMID: 25952353 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Revised: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Rigorous implementation research is important for testing strategies to improve the delivery of effective osteoarthritis (OA) interventions. The objective of this manuscript is to describe principles of implementation research, including conceptual frameworks, study designs and methodology, with specific recommendations for randomized clinical trials of OA treatment and management. This manuscript includes a comprehensive review of prior research and recommendations for implementation trials. The review of literature included identification of seminal articles on implementation research methods, as well as examples of previous exemplar studies using these methods. In addition to a comprehensive summary of this literature, this manuscript provides key recommendations for OA implementation trials. This review concluded that to date there have been relatively few implementation trials of OA interventions, but this is an emerging area of research. Future OA clinical trials should routinely consider incorporation of implementation aims to enhance translation of findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D Allen
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Health Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - N E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
| | - Y M Golightly
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - G Hawker
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bishop A, Holden MA, Ogollah RO, Foster NE. Current management of pregnancy-related low back pain: a national cross-sectional survey of U.K. physiotherapists. Physiotherapy 2015; 102:78-85. [PMID: 26050136 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Accepted: 02/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy-related low back pain (LBP) is very common. Evidence from a systematic review supports the use of exercise and acupuncture, although little is known about the care received by women with pregnancy-related back pain in the U.K. OBJECTIVE To describe current acupuncture and standard care management of pregnancy-related LBP by U.K. physiotherapists. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey of physiotherapists with experience of treating women with pregnancy-related LBP from three professional networks of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. METHODS In total, 1093 physiotherapists were mailed a questionnaire. The questionnaire captured respondents' demographic and practice setting information, and experience of managing women with pregnancy-related back pain, and investigated the reported management of pregnancy-related LBP using a patient case vignette of a specific, 'typical' case. RESULTS The overall response rate was 58% (629/1093). Four hundred and ninety-nine physiotherapists had experience of treating women with pregnancy-related LBP and were included in the analysis. Most respondents worked wholly or partly in the U.K. National Health Service (78%). Most respondents reported that they treat patients with pregnancy-related LBP in three to four one-to-one treatment sessions over 3 to 6 weeks. The results show that a range of management strategies are employed for pregnancy-related LBP, and multimodal management is common. The most common reported treatment was home exercises (94%), and 24% of physiotherapists reported that they would use acupuncture with the patient described in the vignette. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first robust data on the management of pregnancy-related LBP by U.K. physiotherapists. Multimodal management is common, although exercise is the most frequently used treatment for pregnancy-related LBP. Acupuncture is used less often for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bishop
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
| | - M A Holden
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - R O Ogollah
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Keeley T, Al-Janabi H, Nicholls E, Foster NE, Jowett S, Coast J. A longitudinal assessment of the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A in a randomised controlled trial of a knee pain intervention. Qual Life Res 2015; 24:2319-31. [PMID: 25894061 PMCID: PMC4564441 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-0980-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The ICECAP-A is a simple measure of capability well-being for use with the adult population. The descriptive system is made up of five key attributes: Stability, Attachment, Autonomy, Achievement and Enjoyment. Studies have begun to assess the psychometric properties of the measure, including the construct and content validity and feasibility for use. This is the first study to use longitudinal data to assess the responsiveness of the measure. METHODS This responsiveness study was completed alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing three physiotherapy-led exercise interventions for older adults with knee pain attributable to osteoarthritis. Anchor-based methodologies were used to explore the relationship between change over time in ICECAP-A score (the target measure) and change over time in another measure (the anchor). Analyses were completed using the non-value-weighted and value-weighted ICECAP-A scores. The EQ-5D-3L was used as a comparator measure to contextualise change in the ICECAP-A. Effect sizes, standardised response means and t tests were used to quantify responsiveness. RESULTS Small changes in the ICECAP-A scores were seen in response to underlying changes in patients' health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression. Non-weighted scores were slightly more responsive than value-weighted scores. ICECAP-A change was of comparable size to change in the EQ-5D-3L reference measure. CONCLUSION This first analysis of the responsiveness using longitudinal data provides some positive evidence for the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A measure. There is a need for further research in those with low health and capability, and experiencing larger underlying changes in quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Keeley
- MRC Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. .,Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - H Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - E Nicholls
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - S Jowett
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - J Coast
- MRC Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Salisbury C, Foster NE, Hopper C, Bishop A, Hollinghurst S, Coast J, Kaur S, Pearson J, Franchini A, Hall J, Grove S, Calnan M, Busby J, Montgomery AA. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'PhysioDirect' telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy. Health Technol Assess 2013; 17:1-157, v-vi. [PMID: 23356839 DOI: 10.3310/hta17020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a result of long delays for physiotherapy for musculoskeletal problems, several areas in the UK have introduced PhysioDirect services in which patients telephone a physiotherapist for initial assessment and treatment advice. However, there is no robust evidence about the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness or acceptability to patients of PhysioDirect. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether or not PhysioDirect is equally as clinically effective as and more cost-effective than usual care for patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) problems in primary care. DESIGN Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to assess equivalence, incorporating economic evaluation and nested qualitative research. Patients were randomised in 2 : 1 ratio to PhysioDirect or usual care using a remote automated allocation system at the level of the individual, stratifying by physiotherapy site and minimising by sex, age group and site of MSK problem. For the economic analysis, cost consequences included NHS and patient costs, and the cost of lost production. Cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out from the perspective of the NHS. Interviews were conducted with patients, physiotherapists and their managers. SETTING Four community physiotherapy services in England. PARTICIPANTS Adults referred by general practitioners or self-referred for physiotherapy for a MSK problem. INTERVENTIONS Patients allocated to PhysioDirect were invited to telephone a senior physiotherapist for initial assessment and advice using a computerised template, followed by face-to-face care when necessary. Patients allocated to usual care were put on to a waiting list for face-to-face care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was the Short Form questionnaire-36 items, version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Score (PCS) at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included other measures of health outcome [Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EuroQol health utility measure, EQ-5D), global improvement, response to treatment], wait for treatment, time lost from work and usual activities, patient satisfaction. Data were collected by postal questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks and 6 months, and from routine records by researchers blind to allocation. RESULTS A total of 1506 patients were allocated to PhysioDirect and 743 to usual care. Patients allocated to PhysioDirect had a shorter wait for treatment than those allocated to usual care [median 7 days vs 34 days; arm-time ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.35] and had fewer non-attended face-to-face appointments [incidence rate ratio 0.55 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.73)]. The primary outcome at 6 months' follow-up was equivalent between PhysioDirect and usual care [mean PCS 43.50 vs 44.18, adjusted difference in means -0.01 (95% CI -0.80 to 0.79)]. The secondary measures of health outcome all demonstrated equivalence at 6 months, with slightly greater improvement in the PhysioDirect arm at 6 weeks' follow-up. Patients were equally satisfied with access to care but slightly less satisfied overall with PhysioDirect compared with usual care. NHS costs (physiotherapy plus other relevant NHS costs) per patient were similar in the two arms [PhysioDirect £ 198.98 vs usual care £ 179.68, difference in means £ 19.30 (95% CI -£ 37.60 to £ 76.19)], while QALYs gained were also similar [difference in means 0.007 (95% CI -0.003 to 0.016)]. Incremental cost per QALY gained was £ 2889. The probability that PhysioDirect was cost-effective at a £ 20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold was 88%. These conclusions about cost-effectiveness were robust to sensitivity analyses. There was no evidence of difference between trial arms in cost to patients or value of lost production. No adverse events were detected. CONCLUSIONS Providing physiotherapy via PhysioDirect is equally clinically effective compared with usual waiting list-based care, provides faster access to treatment, appears to be safe, and is broadly acceptable to patients. PhysioDirect is probably cost-effective compared with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Foster NE. SP0176 Management of Primary Care for People with Knee Osteoarthritis: The Beep Study (Best Evidence for Exercise in Knee Pain). Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
22
|
Williams D, Khamashta M, Ostensen M, Nelson-Piercy C, Emery P, Parmar M, Barton A, Clinch J, Silman AJ, Grahame R, Hakim A, Lemmey A, Hurkmans E, Knittle K, Vlieland TV, Manning V, Frith J, Bearne L, Macfarlane GJ, MacGregor A, Silman AJ, Dixon W, Maffulli N, Hughes C, Bull A, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Diamond B, Isenberg D, Isaacs J, Denton CP, Rahman A, Hill J, Foster NE, Hewlett S, Sanderson T, Conaghan P. Reproductive issues in rheumatology: do you know how to advise your patients? * I1. Is pregnancy a stress test for subsequent development of autoimmunity? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
McErlane F, Beresford MW, Baildam EM, Thomson W, Hyrich K, Chieng A, Davidson J, Foster HE, Gardner-Medwin J, Lunt M, Wedderburn L, Nikiphorou E, Carpenter L, Kiely P, Walsh D, Dixey J, Young A, Kapoor SR, Filer A, Fitzpatrick M, Fisher BA, Taylor PC, Buckley C, McInnes I, Raza K, Young SP, Dougados M, Kissel K, Amital H, Conaghan P, Martin-Mola E, Nasonov E, Schett G, Troum O, Veldi T, Bernasconi C, Huizinga T, Durez P, Genovese MC, Richards HB, Supronik J, Dokoupilova E, Aelion JA, Lee SH, Codding CE, Kellner H, Ikawa T, Hugot S, Ligozio G, Mpofu S, Kavanaugh A, Emery P, Fleischmann R, Van Vollenhoven R, Pavelka K, Durez P, Guerette B, Santra S, Redden L, Kupper H, Smolen JS, Wilkie R, Tajar A, McBeth J, Hooper LS, Bowen CJ, Gates L, Culliford D, Edwards CJ, Arden NK, Adams J, Ryan S, Haywood H, Pain H, Siddle HJ, Redmond AC, Waxman R, Dagg AR, Alcacer-Pitarch B, Wilkins RA, Helliwell PS, Norton S, Kiely P, Walsh D, Williams R, Young A, Halls S, Law RJ, Jones J, Markland D, Maddison P, Thom J, Parker B, Urowitz MB, Gladman DD, Bruce I, Croca SC, Pericleous C, Yong H, Isenberg D, Giles I, Rahman A, Ioannou Y, Warrell CE, Dobarro D, Handler C, Denton CP, Schreiber BE, Coghlan JG, Betteridge ZE, Woodhead F, Bunn C, Denton CP, Abraham D, Desai S, du Bois R, Wells A, McHugh N, Abignano G, Aydin S, Castillo-Gallego C, Woods D, Meekings A, McGonagle D, Emery P, Del Galdo F, Vila J, Mitchell S, Bowman S, Price E, Pease CT, Emery P, Andrews J, Bombardieri M, Sutcliffe N, Pitzalis C, Lanyon P, Hunter J, Gupta M, McLaren J, Regan M, Cooper A, Giles I, Isenberg D, Vadivelu S, Coady D, Griffiths B, Lendrem D, Foggo H, Tarn J, Ng WF, Goodhead C, Shekar P, Kelly C, Francis G, Bailey AM, Thompson L, Hamilton J, Salisbury C, Foster NE, Bishop A, Coast J, Franchini A, Hall J, Hollinghurst S, Hopper C, Grove S, Kaur S, Montgomery A, Paskins Z, Sanders T, Croft PR, Hassell AB, Coxon DE, Frisher M, Jordan KP, Jinks C, Peat G, Monk HL, Muller S, Mallen C, Hider SL, Roddy E, Muller S, Hayward R, Mallen C. Oral abstracts 3: RA Treatment and outcomes * O13. Validation of jadas in all subtypes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a clinical setting. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
24
|
Evans S, Otter S, Walker-Bone K, Prada A, Isasi C, Campos J, Oton T, Polo J, Garcia B, Mulero J, Gadallah NA, El-Hefnawy HE, El-Arousy NH, El-Hefnawy NG, Abdou TA, El Shafie EA, El Zohiery AK, Hider SL, Whitehurst DG, Thomas E, Foster NE, Devany AJ, Musonda P, Blake JC. Soft Tissue and Regional Musculoskeletal Disease, Fibromyalgia [114-118]: 114. Foot and Ankle Injuries in Footballers: A Pilot Epidemiological Study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
25
|
|
26
|
Parsons S, Breen A, Foster NE, Letley L, Pincus T, Vogel S, Underwood M. Prevalence and comparative troublesomeness by age of musculoskeletal pain in different body locations. Fam Pract 2007; 24:308-16. [PMID: 17602173 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmm027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain has large health care costs and a major impact on the health of those affected. Few studies have also considered the severity of pain in different parts of the body across all age groups. OBJECTIVES To measure the prevalence and troublesomeness of musculoskeletal pain in different body locations and age groups, in a consistent manner, without using location specific health outcome measures. METHODS A cross-sectional postal survey of 4049 adults registered with 16 MRC General Practice Research Framework practices. Frequency of chronic pain overall and troublesome pain by location and age was calculated. Logistic regression was undertaken to explore the relationship between chronic pain and demographic factors. RESULTS We received 2504 replies; response rate 60%. The prevalence of chronic pain was 41%. The prevalence of chronic pain rose from 23% in 18-24 year olds reaching a peak of 50% in 55-64 year olds. Troublesome pain over the last 4 weeks was commonest in the lower back (25%), neck (18%), knee (17%) and shoulder (17%). Troublesome wrist, elbow, shoulder, neck and lower back pain were most prevalent in the 45- to 64-year-age groups. Troublesome hip/thigh, knee and ankle/foot pain were most prevalent in those aged 75 or more. CONCLUSIONS Great efforts have been made to develop and test treatments for low back pain. Our findings suggest that the overall prevalence of troublesome neck, knee and shoulder pain approaches that of troublesome low back pain and that similar efforts may be required to improve the management these pains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Parsons
- Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carnes D, Parsons S, Ashby D, Breen A, Foster NE, Pincus T, Vogel S, Underwood M. Chronic musculoskeletal pain rarely presents in a single body site: results from a UK population study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46:1168-70. [PMID: 17488750 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the frequency and health impact of chronic multi-site musculoskeletal pain, in a representative UK sample. METHOD Population postal questionnaire survey, using 16 general practices in the southeast of England, nationally representative urban/rural, ethnic and socioeconomic mix. A random selection of 4049 registered patients, aged 18 or over, were sent a questionnaire. The main outcome measures were chronic pain location, identified using a pain drawing; distress, pain intensity and disability as measured by the GHQ12 and the Chronic Pain Grade. RESULTS A total of 2445 patients (60%) responded to the survey (44% male, mean age 52 yrs); 45% had chronic musculoskeletal pain. Of those with chronic pain, three quarters had pain in multiple sites (two or more sites). Variables significantly predicting this were: age under 55, [odds ratio (OR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4, 0.6]; psychological distress (OR 1.8, CI at 95% 1.4, 2.2) and high pain intensity (OR 5.2, CI at 95% 4.1, 6.7). Only 33% of multi-site pain distributions conformed to the American College of Rheumatology definition of chronic widespread pain. CONCLUSIONS Multi-site chronic pain is more common than single-site chronic pain and is commonly associated with other problems. Indiscriminate targeting of research and care for chronic musculoskeletal pain on single sites may often be inappropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Carnes
- Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and The London, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2 Newark St, London, E1 2AT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of acupuncture on pain and function in patients with chronic knee pain. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adequate acupuncture. Computerized databases and reference lists of articles were searched in June 2006. Studies were selected in which adults with chronic knee pain or osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized to receive either acupuncture treatment or a control consisting of sham (placebo) acupuncture, other sham treatments, no additional intervention (usual care), or an active intervention. The main outcome measures were short-term pain and function, and study validity was assessed using a modification of a previously published instrument. RESULTS Thirteen RCTs were included, of which eight used adequate acupuncture and provided WOMAC outcomes, so were combined in meta-analyses. Six of these had validity scores of more than 50%. Combining five studies in 1334 patients, acupuncture was superior to sham acupuncture for both pain (weighted mean difference in WOMAC pain subscale score = 2.0, 95% CI 0.57-3.40) and for WOMAC function subscale (4.32, 0.60-8.05). The differences were still significant at long-term follow-up. Acupuncture was also significantly superior to no additional intervention. There were insufficient studies to compare acupuncture with other sham or active interventions. CONCLUSIONS Acupuncture that meets criteria for adequate treatment is significantly superior to sham acupuncture and to no additional intervention in improving pain and function in patients with chronic knee pain. Due to the heterogeneity in the results, however, further research is required to confirm these findings and provide more information on long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A White
- Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Grant MI, Foster NE, Wright CC, Barlow JH, Cullen LA. Being a parent or grandparent with back pain, ankylosing spondylitis or rheumatoid arthritis: a descriptive postal survey. Musculoskeletal Care 2004; 2:17-28. [PMID: 17041965 DOI: 10.1002/msc.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Research that explores being a parent or grandparent with musculoskeletal problems has been fairly limited to date. The aim of this study was to describe the experience of parenting in the context of back pain (BP), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with a particular focus on the extent and nature of childcare experiences and to compare these experiences across the three groups. In addition, the possible reasons for these reported experiences, the availability of advice and support and the development of strategies for coping were explored using a cross-sectional descriptive survey. A total of 448 participants was recruited from relevant charitable organizations and the National Health Service (280 with BP, 106 with AS and 62 with RA). A combination of opportunistic and random sampling was used. Quantitative data were analysed with appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 10). Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis. Results indicate that a high proportion of all groups experienced a wide range of difficulties with parenting (81% BP, 77% AS, 97% RA). The most prevalent problems were similar for all three groups: lifting baby/child from the floor or cot, encouraging children/grandchildren to help with domestic chores and keeping up (in terms of energy) with children/grandchildren. However, the RA group reported having greater difficulties than the other two groups. Very little advice was offered to participants with parenting difficulties which may indicate a gap in service provision. However, a wide range of strategies for coping were described by respondents. The study highlighted a need for healthcare professionals to develop a greater awareness of parenting issues and to provide opportunities for these issues to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M I Grant
- School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Billis EV, Foster NE, Wright CC. Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2003; 8:223-32. [PMID: 14559045 DOI: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00017-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Location of spinal levels by palpation is an essential part of physiotherapy assessment and treatment of spinal musculoskeletal conditions. This study aimed to (i) investigate the reproducibility and repeatability of three groups of physiotherapists in locating three randomly selected spinal levels by palpation, (ii) explore whether these groups were palpating similar points at each level, and (iii) investigate whether there were differences in palpation across the spinal levels tested. Reproducibility was estimated using a convenience sample of 30 physiotherapists: 13 undergraduate students, 10 clinicians, and seven manual therapists (MTs). Repeatability was investigated using six physiotherapists (two students, two clinicians and two MTs). Each therapist palpated the spinous processes (C5, T6, L5) once for reproducibility, and 10 times for repeatability, on each asymptomatic model. The skin overlying the spinal levels was marked with an invisible pen. Using an ultra-violet light, marks were transcribed onto transparent plastic strips for analysis, and the distances were measured with an electronic caliper. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) indicated poor reproducibility across therapists at all spinal levels (F=18.43, P=0.001), but good repeatability within therapists (F=2.09, P=0.161). Students produced different mean locations of their palpatory marks from the other two groups in two spinal levels. Clinicians and MTs were more reproducible than students, and located similar levels. Palpation of L5 spinous process presented the most difficulty, for all groups. Further research is needed to compare different methods of palpation and explore whether reproducibility can be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E V Billis
- School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Foster NE. Development and Evaluation of a Multimedia Web Resource Using Computer Mediated Communication as a Tool for Learning and Teaching in a Research Project Module. Physiotherapy 2003. [DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)65893-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
32
|
Foster NE, Pincus T, Underwood MR, Vogel S, Breen A, Harding G. Understanding the process of care for musculoskeletal conditions--why a biomedical approach is inadequate. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42:401-4. [PMID: 12626788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multiagency Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) coordinates activities and plans for quality measurement and improvement across all the U.S. federal agencies involved in health care. One of its working groups focuses on the health care workforce and ways to improve the quality of care that it provides. In October 1999 four government agencies, under the aegis of the QuIC, convened a conference to examine how health care workplace quality influences the quality of care. A healthy workplace is one in which workers will be able to deliver higher-quality care and in which worker health and patients' high-quality care are mutually supportive. In October 2000 a follow-up conference was held to focus on a specific aspect of health care quality-patient safety. WHAT WE STILL NEED TO KNOW Although enough is known to justify some initiatives to improve the quality of the health care workplace, participants in both meetings agreed that the evidence to prove these associations is weak and that there has been too little research to evaluate the impact of interventions intended to improve quality through improvements in the health care workplace. New evidence-based information is needed to test the theory of the nature of the relationship between working conditions and care quality. CONCLUSION The tradition of evidence-based decision making needs to be applied to health care management as it has in medicine and nursing, to show how staffing, environment, organization, and culture can each can affect the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Eisenberg
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2101 E. Jefferson St, Suite 600, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Konstantinou K, Rushton A, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Breen A. Descriptive Survey of the Use and Effects of Mobilisation with Movement (MWMs) Techniques in Low Back Pain Management. Physiotherapy 2001. [DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)60457-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
35
|
Eisenberg JM, Foster NE, Meyer G, Holland H. Federal efforts to improve quality of care: the Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC). Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27:93-100. [PMID: 11221014 DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27009-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
FORMATION OF THE QUIC: The Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) was established in 1998 to enable the participating federal agencies to coordinate their activities to study, measure, and improve the quality of care delivered by federal health programs; provide people with information to help them in making more informed choices about their care; and develop the research base and infrastructure needed to improve the health care system, including knowledgeable and empowered workers, well-designed systems of care, and useful information systems. STUDY, MEASURE, AND IMPROVE CARE: The QuIC's initial efforts to improve the care delivered in federal health care programs have focused on diabetes, depression, and the effect of working conditions on quality of care. More recently, patient safety efforts are under way to establish a coordinating center that will enable those who are testing methods of reducing errors to share information across their projects and with experts in error reduction. DEVELOP A RESEARCH BASE AND INFRASTRUCTURE: The QuIC has coordinated efforts in credentialing, information on measures of quality, a taxonomy of quality improvement methods, and errors data collection. PROVIDE INFORMATION TO AMERICANS ABOUT HEALTH CARE QUALITY: The QuIC agencies are developing products that will enhance their ability to communicate with the American people about their health care choices: improved gateways for consumer information available from federal agencies, a glossary of commonly used terms, and guidance for producing report cards on quality of care. MOVING THE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AGENDA FORWARD: Federal efforts to improve quality of care are moving forward in a more integrated fashion on a wide number of fronts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Eisenberg
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2101 E Jefferson St, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Billis EV, Foster NE, Wright CC. Inter-tester and Intra-tester Reliability of Three Groups of Physiotherapists in Locating Spinal Levels by Palpation. Physiotherapy 1999. [DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)67196-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- NE Foster
- Psychosocial Rheumatology Research Centre, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB
| | - MI Wade
- Psychosocial Rheumatology Research Centre, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB
| | - K Harrison
- Psychosocial Rheumatology Research Centre, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB
| | - JH Barlow
- Psychosocial Rheumatology Research Centre, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Foster NE, Thompson KA, Baxter GD, Allen JM. Management of nonspecific low back pain by physiotherapists in Britain and Ireland. A descriptive questionnaire of current clinical practice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24:1332-42. [PMID: 10404576 DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A descriptive questionnaire of chartered physiotherapists. OBJECTIVE To investigate current physiotherapeutic management of low back pain throughout Britain and Ireland. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Physiotherapists play a key role in low back pain management. Although clinical guidelines for best practice have been developed recently, there has been no large-scale attempt to describe current physiotherapeutic treatment approaches within Britain or Ireland. METHODS After semi-structured interviews (n = 6) and two pilot studies (n = 77) were done, postal questionnaires were distributed to four regional cluster samples of the membership of two physiotherapy professional organizations (n = 2654). After two mailings, a random sample of 90 nonresponders were followed up. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Ltd., Woking, Surrey, UK), and precision of the survey estimates was assessed by calculation of sampling errors and intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster sampling. RESULTS Results were received from 1548 therapists (total response rate, 58.3%); of these, 813 reported that they were practicing in settings in which they treated patients with low back pain. Analysis of the results indicated the overall popularity of the Maitland mobilization and McKenzie approaches among physiotherapists. Although exercise per se was mentioned frequently by respondents, a marked difference in opinion among therapists regarding the optimal type of exercise for low back pain was obvious. Little evidence was demonstrated of the use of manipulation, fitness programs, or multidisciplinary efforts involving behavioral and physical aspects of treatment. Commonly used methods of electrotherapy were interferential therapy, ultrasound, pulsed short-wave diathermy, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study emphasize the need to evaluate further and improve the dissemination of findings regarding the effectiveness of specific physiotherapy approaches for low back pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N E Foster
- School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barlow JH, Cullen LA, Foster NE, Harrison K, Wade M. Does arthritis influence perceived ability to fulfill a parenting role? Perceptions of mothers, fathers and grandparents. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 37:141-151. [PMID: 14528541 DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00136-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The presence of a painful, disabling chronic disease may have implications for perceived ability to fulfill a parenting role. The purpose of this research was to examine the realities of parenting from the perspectives of mothers, fathers and grandparents with arthritis using a combination of methods: a cross sectional survey and in-depth focus group discussions. There was consensus that pain, fatigue and restricted physical functioning combined to interfere with the parenting role. Overall, approximately 35% of the sample had experienced difficulties attributed to arthritis. A gender difference emerged with women reporting more difficulties in relation to caring for babies and toddlers, whereas men reported more problems as children grew older. Key themes concerned: physical limitations; practical and caring issues; social factors; emotional response; hereditary risks and safety issues. Perceived inability to fulfill parenting roles resulted in feelings of frustration, guilt, anger and depression. A number of positive outcomes were mentioned including children's increased awareness of the needs of others. Limitations of the methodological approach adopted are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Barlow
- Psychosocial Rheumatology Research Centre, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Foster NE, Doonan J, Walsh DM, Baxter GD, Allen JM. An Investigation of the Analgesic Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Parameter Combinations upon Low Back Pain: A single-case series. Physiotherapy 1997. [DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)65939-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Foster NE, Baxter F, Walsh DM, Baxter GD, Allen JM. Manipulation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation variables has no effect on two models of experimental pain in humans. Clin J Pain 1996; 12:301-10. [PMID: 8969875 DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199612000-00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Two separate studies investigated the hypoalgesic effect of manipulation of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) parameters on two models of experimental pain: the Submaximal Effort Tourniquet Technique and cold-pressor pain. For the first study, 32 healthy subjects (16 male and 16 female) attended once for the purpose of cold-pressor pain induction that involved immersion of the nondominant hand in a water bath at 0 degree C. Subjects were allocated to Control, Placebo, or 1 of 2 treatment groups (110 or 4-Hz TENS). Pain threshold measurements (time to withdrawal of hand in seconds) were obtained over six standardised cold pain cycles (i.e., two before stimulation onset, three during stimulation, and one cycle after stimulation). In the second study, 48 healthy volunteers (24 male and 24 female) attended on two occasions, 48 h apart, for the purposes of ischaemic pain induction. On the first attendance, baseline data were obtained and on the second, subjects were randomly allocated to Control, Placebo, or one of four treatment groups with different combinations of stimulation frequencies and pulse durations (4 or 110 Hz and 50 or 200 microseconds). Measurements of "current pain intensity" and "worst pain experienced" were obtained via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), respectively. Analysis of variance performed on both sets of collected data revealed no significant differences between any of the groups, thus indicating no apparent relevance of manipulation of TENS parameters using these models of pain. Several hypotheses are suggested to explain these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N E Foster
- Rehabilitation Sciences Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Walsh DM, Foster NE, Baxter GD, Allen JM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Relevance of stimulation parameters to neurophysiological and hypoalgesic effects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74:199-206. [PMID: 7779330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Although Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) has become a popular modality in pain management over the past 20 yr, there is still debate over its mechanisms of action and the precise relevance of stimulation parameters to its hypoalgesic effects. Thus, confusion still surrounds the selection of optimal stimulation parameters. Two separate studies (total n = 88) were carried out to investigate the effect of four combinations of TENS pulse durations (50 microseconds & 200 microseconds) and frequencies (4 Hz and 110 Hz) on nerve conduction in the human superficial radial nerve and on Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT) within the associated sensory distribution of the nerve over the dorsum of the hand. Results showed that application of one combination of TENS parameters (110 Hz, 200 microseconds) directly over the course of the nerve produced a significant increase in both peripheral nerve conduction latency (P < or = 0.05; analysis of variance (ANOVA)) and MPT (P < or = 0.01). In addition, there was a high correlation (r = 0.9) between shifts in MPT and negative peak latency for the groups treated with this combination of TENS parameters. The results of this study thus illustrate that combinations of TENS parameters are important to the peripheral neurophysiological effects of this modality and, further, its associated hypoalgesic effects, at least on the model of pain used here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Walsh
- School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Northern Ireland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
The declining interest in primary care among U.S. medical students is an ominous trend for the national health system. The medical school environment, the powerful financial incentives promoting specialism, and the practice environment itself have contributed to the decline of generalism. During a day-long meeting sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, representatives of group practices, HMOs, community health centers, and military medicine noted the universal shortage of primary care physicians, the fact that medical education does not prepare physicians for the realities of practice, the concern that "burnout" is a significant problem for retention and physician satisfaction, and the problem that the optimal design of primary care practice is not yet known. To reverse these trends, concerted action must take place within academic medicine, by public policy makers, and by the delivery system itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L G Sandy
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ 08543-2316
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
An effective device for performing cranial autopsies is described. This device prevents the aerosolization of potentially infectious particulate material while opening the cranial vault.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Towfighi
- Department of Pathology (Anatomic Pathology), Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bradicich R, Foster NE, Hons FE, Jeffus MT, Kenner CT. Residues in food and feed. Arsenic in cottonseed products and various commodities. Pestic Monit J 1969; 3:139-41. [PMID: 5395578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
46
|
Hoelscher CE, Wolfenbarger DA, Foster NE. Parathion and methyl parathion residues on cabbage and southernpeas. J Econ Entomol 1968; 61:56-58. [PMID: 5636847 DOI: 10.1093/jee/61.1.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
|
47
|
Philpott RH, Foster NE, Crichton D. Indications and effects of exchange transfusion in adults in gynaecology and obstetrics. Br Med J 1966; 2:1630-3. [PMID: 5926130 PMCID: PMC1944525 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5530.1630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|