1
|
Etheve L, Courcelles E, Lefaudeux D, Kurbatova P, Gomez G, Kahoul R, Boissel JP, Kulesza A, Dwivedi G, Schmidely N, Bertocchio JP, Gittoes N, Siebert U, Bechet E. 4Essais cliniques in silico, une approche innovante visant à compléter les essais cliniques dans le domaine des maladies rares : validation d'un modèle computationnel chez les patients atteints d'hypoparathyroïdie. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2022.09.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
2
|
Bastounis A, Langley T, Davis S, Paskins Z, Gittoes N, Leonardi-Bee J, Sahota O. Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:1223-1233. [PMID: 35188591 PMCID: PMC9106630 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06350-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures; however, high rates of adherence are needed to preserve clinical benefits. OBJECTIVE To investigate persistence and compliance to oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate). METHODS Searches of 12 databases, unpublished sources, and trial registries were conducted, covering the period from 2000 to April 2021. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool 1.0 & ROBINS-I) were independently undertaken by two study authors. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patients' adherence were included. Network meta-analyses (NMA) embedded within a Bayesian framework were conducted, investigating users' likelihood in discontinuing bisphosphonate treatment. Where meta-analysis was not possible, data were synthesised using the vote-counting synthesis method. RESULTS Fifty-nine RCTs and 43 observational studies were identified, resulting in a total population of 2,656,659 participants. Data from 59 RCTs and 24 observational studies were used to populate NMAs. Zoledronate users were the least likely to discontinue their treatment HR = 0.73 (95%CrI: 0.61, 0.88). Higher rates of compliance were observed in those receiving intravenous treatments. The paucity of data and the heterogeneity in the reported medication possession ratio thresholds precluded a NMA of compliance data. CONCLUSIONS Users of intravenously administered bisphosphonates were found to be the most adherent to treatment among bisphosphonates' users. Patterns of adherence will permit the more precise estimation of clinical and cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020177166.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Bastounis
- grid.412920.c0000 0000 9962 2336Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB UK
| | - T. Langley
- grid.412920.c0000 0000 9962 2336Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB UK
| | - S. Davis
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Z. Paskins
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG UK
- grid.500956.fHaywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent , Staffordshire UK
| | - N. Gittoes
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- grid.412563.70000 0004 0376 6589Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK
| | - J. Leonardi-Bee
- grid.412920.c0000 0000 9962 2336Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB UK
| | - O. Sahota
- grid.240404.60000 0001 0440 1889Queens Medical Centre (QMC), University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lithgow K, Siqueira I, Senthil L, Chew HS, Chavda SV, Ayuk J, Toogood A, Gittoes N, Matthews T, Batra R, Meade S, Sanghera P, Khan N, Ahmed S, Paluzzi A, Tsermoulas G, Karavitaki N. Pituitary metastases: presentation and outcomes from a pituitary center over the last decade. Pituitary 2020; 23:258-265. [PMID: 32189207 PMCID: PMC7181548 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-020-01034-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Highlight and characterize manifestations, diagnostic/management approaches and outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients with pituitary metastases (PM) from a large European pituitary center-over 10 years. METHODS Retrospective review of PM cases between 1/2009 and 12/2018. Clinical, laboratory, imaging data at PM detection and during follow-up were analysed. RESULTS 18 cases were identified (14 females; median age at diagnosis 61.5 years). Most common primary malignancies were lung (39%) and breast (32%). Most frequent presenting manifestation was visual dysfunction (50%). Gonadotrophin, ACTH, TSH deficiency were diagnosed in 85%, 67%, 46% of cases, respectively; diabetes insipidus (DI) was present in 17%. 33% of cases were detected during investigation for symptoms unrelated to PM. PM management included radiotherapy (44%), transsphenoidal surgery (17%), transsphenoidal surgery and radiotherapy (6%) or monitoring only (33%). One-year survival was 49% with median survival from PM detection 11 months (range 2-47). CONCLUSIONS In our contemporary series, clinical presentation of PM has evolved; we found increased prevalence of anterior hypopituitarism, decreased rates of DI and longer survival compared with older literature. Increased availability of diagnostic imaging, improvements in screening and recognition of pituitary disease and longer survival of patients with metastatic cancer may be contributing factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Lithgow
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Siqueira
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Senthil
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - H S Chew
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S V Chavda
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Ayuk
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Toogood
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - N Gittoes
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Matthews
- Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Batra
- Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Meade
- Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Sanghera
- Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - N Khan
- Department of Ear, Nose & Throat, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Ahmed
- Department of Ear, Nose & Throat, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Paluzzi
- Department of Neurosugery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - G Tsermoulas
- Department of Neurosugery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - N Karavitaki
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK.
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Condurache CI, Chiu S, Chotiyarnwong P, Johansson H, Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Khioe RFS, Fordham R, Gittoes N, Harvey I, Harvey NC, Heawood A, Holland R, Howe A, Kanis JA, Marshall T, O'Neill TW, Peters TJ, Redmond NM, Torgerson D, Turner D, McCloskey E. Screening for high hip fracture risk does not impact on falls risk: a post hoc analysis from the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:457-464. [PMID: 31960099 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05270-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A reduction in hip fracture incidence following population screening might reflect the effectiveness of anti-osteoporosis therapy, behaviour change to reduce falls, or both. This post hoc analysis demonstrates that identifying high hip fracture risk by FRAX was not associated with any alteration in falls risk. INTRODUCTION To investigate whether effectiveness of an osteoporosis screening programme to reduce hip fractures was mediated by modification of falls risk in the screening arm. METHODS The SCOOP study recruited 12,483 women aged 70-85 years, individually randomised to a control (n = 6250) or screening (n = 6233) arm; in the latter, osteoporosis treatment was recommended to women at high risk of hip fracture, while the control arm received usual care. Falls were captured by self-reported questionnaire. We determined the influence of baseline risk factors on future falls, and then examined for differences in falls risk between the randomisation groups, particularly in those at high fracture risk. RESULTS Women sustaining one or more falls were slightly older at baseline than those remaining falls free during follow-up (mean difference 0.70 years, 95%CI 0.55-0.85, p < 0.001). A higher FRAX 10-year probability of hip fracture was associated with increased likelihood of falling, with fall risk increasing by 1-2% for every 1% increase in hip fracture probability. However, falls risk factors were well balanced between the study arms and, importantly, there was no evidence of a difference in falls occurrence. In particular, there was no evidence of interaction (p = 0.18) between baseline FRAX hip fracture probabilities and falls risk in the two arms, consistent with no impact of screening on falls in women informed to be at high risk of hip fracture. CONCLUSION Effectiveness of screening for high FRAX hip fracture probability to reduce hip fracture risk was not mediated by a reduction in falls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C I Condurache
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Chiu
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - P Chotiyarnwong
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - H Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Shepstone
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - E Lenaghan
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Clarke
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R F S Khioe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - R Fordham
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Harvey
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - A Heawood
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R Holland
- Leicester Medical School, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - A Howe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T Marshall
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - T W O'Neill
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - T J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - N M Redmond
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation, Bristol, UK
| | - D Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - D Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - E McCloskey
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parsons CM, Harvey N, Shepstone L, Kanis JA, Lenaghan E, Clarke S, Fordham R, Gittoes N, Harvey I, Holland R, Redmond NM, Howe A, Marshall T, Peters TJ, Torgerson D, O'Neill TW, McCloskey E, Cooper C. Systematic screening using FRAX ® leads to increased use of, and adherence to, anti-osteoporosis medications: an analysis of the UK SCOOP trial. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:67-75. [PMID: 31606826 PMCID: PMC6952271 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05142-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In the large community-based SCOOP trial, systematic fracture risk screening using FRAX® led to greater use of AOM and greater adherence, in women at high fracture risk, compared with usual care. INTRODUCTION In the SCreening of Older wOmen for Prevention of fracture (SCOOP) trial, we investigated the effect of the screening intervention on subsequent long-term self-reported adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications (AOM). METHODS SCOOP was a primary care-based UK multicentre trial of screening for fracture risk. A total of 12,483 women (70-85 years) were randomised to either usual NHS care, or assessment using the FRAX® tool ± dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), with medication recommended for those found to be at high risk of hip fracture. Self-reported AOM use was obtained by postal questionnaires at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Analysis was limited to those who initiated AOM during follow-up. Logistic regression was used to explore baseline determinants of adherence (good ≥ 80%; poor < 80%). RESULTS The mean (SD) age of participants was 75.6 (4.2) years, with 6233 randomised to screening and 6250 to the control group. Of those participants identified at high fracture risk in the screening group, 38.2% of those on treatment at 6 months were still treated at 60 months, whereas the corresponding figure for the control group was 21.6%. Older age was associated with poorer adherence (OR per year increase in age 0.96 [95% CI 0.93, 0.99], p = 0.01), whereas history of parental hip fracture was associated with greater rate adherence (OR 1.67 [95% CI 1.23, 2.26], p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Systematic fracture risk screening using FRAX® leads to greater use of AOM and greater adherence, in women at high fracture risk, compared with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Parsons
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - N Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Institute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - S Clarke
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R Fordham
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Harvey
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - R Holland
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N M Redmond
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR CLAHRC West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - A Howe
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - T J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - T W O'Neill
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N, Hope S, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Poole KES, Reid DM, Selby P, Thompson F, Thurston A, Vine N. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 2017; 12:43. [PMID: 28425085 PMCID: PMC5397452 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 500] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2008, the UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) produced a guideline on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, with an update in 2013. This paper presents a major update of the guideline, the scope of which is to review the assessment and management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women and men age 50 years or over. METHODS Where available, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials were used to provide the evidence base. Conclusions and recommendations were systematically graded according to the strength of the available evidence. RESULTS Review of the evidence and recommendations are provided for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, fracture-risk assessment, lifestyle measures and pharmacological interventions, duration and monitoring of bisphosphonate therapy, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, osteoporosis in men, postfracture care and intervention thresholds. CONCLUSION The guideline, which has received accreditation from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment and management of osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals who are involved in its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Compston
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - A. Cooper
- Crawley Fracture Liaison Service, Crawley, Sussex, UK
| | - C. Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - N. Gittoes
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham & Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - C. Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol and Royal United Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - N. Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S. Hope
- Metabolic Bone, Nuffield Orthopaedic Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - J. A. Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - K. E. S. Poole
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - D. M. Reid
- Emeritus Professor of Rheumatology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - P. Selby
- Metabolic Bone Disease, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - N. Vine
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - The National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG)
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Crawley Fracture Liaison Service, Crawley, Sussex, UK
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Birmingham & Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol and Royal United Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
- Metabolic Bone, Nuffield Orthopaedic Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Metabolic Bone, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Emeritus Professor of Rheumatology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Metabolic Bone Disease, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Osteoporosis Society, Camerton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shipman KE, Stammers J, Doyle A, Gittoes N. Delivering a quality-assured fracture liaison service in a UK teaching hospital-is it achievable? Osteoporos Int 2016; 27:3049-56. [PMID: 27193285 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3639-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED To determine whether new national guidance on the specifications of a fracture liaison service are realistically deliverable, 1 year of data on the performance of such a service were audited. Audit targets were mostly met. This audit demonstrates that these standards are deliverable in a real world setting. INTRODUCTION UK service specifications for a fracture liaison service (FLS) have been produced (National Osteoporosis Society, NOS) to promote effective commissioning and delivery of the highest quality care to patients with fragility fractures. How deliverable these standards are has not as yet been methodically reported. Our FLS was modelled on the ten NOS standards; performance was audited after 1 year to determine whether these standards could be delivered and to describe the lessons learnt. METHODS Performance was audited against the NOS FLS Service Standards, with management based on the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®), the four-item Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the National Osteoporosis Guideline Groups (NOGG) guidance. Data were recorded prospectively on a database. The FLS commenced in May 2014, was fully operational in August 2014 and data were captured from 1 September 2014 to 1 September 2015. RESULTS The FLS detected 1773 patients and standards were largely achieved. Most, 94 %, patients were seen within 6 weeks, 533 DXA requests were generated, 804 outpatient FRAT assessments were recorded (134 required falls intervention) and 773 patients had bone treatments started. On follow-up at 3 months, between 78-79 % were still taking medication. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary evaluation of a FLS implemented according to UK NOS standards demonstrates that the model is practical to apply to a large teaching hospital population. Collection and review of outcome and cost effectiveness data is required to determine the performance of this model in comparison with existing models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Shipman
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - J Stammers
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Doyle
- Falls and Fracture Prevention Service, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - N Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners & Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 3rd Floor Heritage Building, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shepstone L, Fordham R, Lenaghan E, Harvey I, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Heawood A, Peters TJ, O'Neill T, Torgerson D, Holland R, Howe A, Marshall T, Kanis JA, McCloskey E. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening older women for the prevention of fractures: rationale, design and methods for the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23:2507-15. [PMID: 22314936 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1876-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2011] [Accepted: 11/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
SCOOP is a UK seven-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with 5-year follow-up, including 11,580 women aged 70 to 85 years, to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a community-based screening programme to reduce fractures. It utilises the FRAX algorithm and DXA to assess the 10-year probability of fracture. Introduction Osteoporotic, or low-trauma, fractures present a considerable burden to the National Health Service and have major adverse effects on quality of life, disability and mortality for the individual. Methods Given the availability of efficacious treatments and a risk assessment tool based upon clinical risk factors and bone mineral density, a case exists to undertake a community-based controlled evaluation of screening for subjects at high risk of fracture, under the hypothesis that such a screening programme would reduce fractures in this population. Results This study is a UK seven-centre, unblinded, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with a 5-year follow-up period. A total of 11,580 women, aged 70 to 85 years and not on prescribed bone protective therapy will be consented to the trial by post via primary care providing 90% power to detect an 18% decrease in fractures. Conclusions Participants will be randomised to either a screening arm or control. Those undergoing screening will have a 10-year fracture probability computed from baseline risk factors together with bone mineral density measured by DXA in selected subjects. Individuals above an age-dependent threshold of fracture probability will be recommended for treatment for the duration of the trial. Subjects in the control arm will receive 'usual care'. Participants will be followed up 6 months after randomisation and annually by postal questionnaires with independent checking of hospital and primary care records. The primary outcome will be the proportion of individuals sustaining fractures in each group. An economic analysis will be carried out to assess cost-effectiveness of screening. A qualitative evaluation will be conducted to examine the acceptability of the process to participants.
Collapse
|
9
|
McCarron N, Meystre C, Wells S, Jones A, Gittoes N, Armour K, Hodson J, Webster C. Hypovitaminosis D in Hospice patients in a Caucasian West Midlands Population. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2012. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000264.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
10
|
Beech TJ, Rokade A, Gittoes N, Johnson AP. A haemangiopericytoma of the ethmoid sinus causing oncogenic osteomalacia: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36:956-8. [PMID: 17498926 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2006] [Revised: 03/04/2007] [Accepted: 03/16/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Oncogenic osteomalacia is a rare cause of osteomalacia. It is caused by a tumour which is generally benign. These tumours, when identified, are often found in the head and neck region. The case is reported here of a haemangiopericytoma isolated in the ethmoid sinus, and the literature regarding tumours at this site is reviewed. Including the present case there are five reported in the world literature of an ethmoid sinus tumour causing oncogenic osteomalacia. The treatment for this disease is excision of the mass, which is where the head and neck specialist's expertise is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Beech
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Kilby MD, Gittoes N, McCabe C, Verhaeg J, Franklyn JA. Expression of thyroid receptor isoforms in the human fetal central nervous system and the effects of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000; 53:469-77. [PMID: 11012572 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01074.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital hypothyroidism is known to be associated with mental retardation which, if recognized promptly, is largely prevented by thyroid hormone replacement. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity, and is also associated with neurodevelopmental delay. Fetuses with IUGR have reduced circulating concentrations of free thyroxine (T4) and free triiodothyronine (T3), leading to the hypothesis that a reduction in the tissue effects of thyroid hormones in the central nervous system (CNS) may contribute to neurodevelopmental morbidity. Since thyroid hormone effects are mediated through binding to specific nuclear thyroid hormone receptors (TRs), we have defined the pattern of TR isoform expression in the CNS throughout normal human development and have compared TR expression in the CNS of normal fetuses with those affected by IUGR. METHODS Samples of normal human fetal brain from first and second trimesters were obtained at surgical termination of pregnancy. Appropriately grown and third trimester fetuses affected by Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) were also investigated after unexplained stillbirth at post mortem examination. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to examine the expression of TR isoform mRNAs in frozen cerebral cortex from 10 to 16 weeks gestation. TR protein expression in human fetal brains (both cerebral hemispheres and cerebellum) was also examined in formalin fixed sections and expression of TR alpha1, alpha2, beta1 and beta2 isoforms being defined using semiquantitative immunocytochemistry. RESULTS RT-PCR revealed the presence of mRNAs encoding TR alpha1, beta1 and beta2 isoforms and the nonfunctional TRalpha2 variant in the fetal cerebral cortex from week 10 of human pregnancy. Immunostaining of the fetal brain revealed TR alpha1 and alpha2 protein from week 11 of human gestation. Expression of all TR isoform proteins was largely confined to the pyramidal neurones of the cerebral cortex and the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum with increasing receptor expression evident with gestational age. Semiquantitative observer scoring showed that by the second trimester, there was a marked increase in the proportion of pyramidal and Purkinje cells expressing TR isoforms, while by the third trimester, all these cells immunostained. Comparison of TR immunostaining in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum from IUGR fetuses (n = 18) matched for gestational age to normal fetuses revealed a lower intensity of expression of all the TR isoforms confirmed by observer scoring and quantification using TR protein immunofluoresence (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate both pre- and post-translational expression of TR alpha and beta isoforms in the cerebral cortex of first trimester fetuses. These findings support the view that the transplacental passage of thyroid hormone in early gestation may be critical to neurological development. Our finding that in severe IUGR the expression of TR isoforms in the human fetal cerebral cortex and cerebellum was significantly reduced, in association with reduced circulating thyroid hormone concentrations indicate that changes in free ligand and receptors may affect CNS development. These findings should prompt further investigation of the potential therapeutic role of peripartum thyroid hormone treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Kilby
- Department of Fetal Medicine, Division of Human Reproduction and Childhealth, Division of Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kilby MD, Verhaeg J, Gittoes N, Somerset DA, Clark PM, Franklyn JA. Circulating thyroid hormone concentrations and placental thyroid hormone receptor expression in normal human pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:2964-71. [PMID: 9709977 DOI: 10.1210/jcem.83.8.5002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Thyroid hormones are critical to growth and development of the human fetus. Abnormal placental development, a major cause of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), is associated with a high perinatal mortality and morbidity. Thyroid status has been postulated to play a role in the pathogenesis of such morbidity. In the present study, we have investigated fetal thyroid function and placental expression of thyroid hormone receptor (TR) alpha and beta variants during normal human pregnancy and in pregnancy associated with IUGR. Measurement of free thyroid hormones and TSH concentrations revealed significant rises in free T4 and free T3 between the second and third trimesters of normal pregnancy. Serum concentrations of free T4 and free T3 were lower in fetuses affected by IUGR, although serum TSH levels were not significantly different. Immunocytochemistry demonstrated the presence of TR alpha1, alpha2, and beta1 proteins within the nuclei of trophoblast and stromal placental cells. Immunostaining for these TR variants increased with increasing gestation in normal placenta. Comparison of IUGR placental samples with normal samples revealed greater immunostaining for TR alpha1, alpha2, and beta1 variants in IUGR. Examination of pretranslational expression of TR alpha1, alpha2, beta1, and beta2 variants by semiquantitative RT-PCR revealed increasing expression of TR alpha1, alpha2, and beta2 messenger RNAs with increasing gestation in normal pregnancy, which "mirrored" post-translational expression. However, and in contrast, there were no significant differences in expression of TR messenger RNAs in normal and IUGR placenta. The present findings of reduction in serum free thyroid hormones and increased expression of TR alpha and beta proteins in association with IUGR highlight the potential importance of thyroid status in influencing long-term fetal outcome in this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Kilby
- Department of Fetal Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Griffith J, Gittoes N. Atypical patterns in the CT diagnosis of aortic dissection. Clin Radiol 1995; 50:349-50. [PMID: 7743731 DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83436-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
15
|
Fellows G, Gittoes N, Scott DG, Coppock JS, Wainwright A, Goodall M, Turner BM. Individual variation in the isotype profile of anti-histone autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Immunol 1988; 72:440-5. [PMID: 3262462 PMCID: PMC1541560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Using a solid-phase radioimmunoassay we have measured levels of anti-histone autoantibodies of the IgG, IgA and IgM heavy chain classes in 40 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Twenty-two patients (55%) had significantly elevated levels of at least one anti-histone isotype. Our results reveal four characteristics of the anti-histone response. (1) There is wide variation between patients in the isotype profile of anti-histone antibodies and these isotype profiles are a consistent individual characteristic. (2) There is no significant correlation between the level of IgG, IgA and IgM anti-histone in individual patients and a marked tendency for a single isotype (either IgG, IgA or IgM) to predominate in any one patient. (3) IgG anti-histone antibodies are predominantly of the IgG1 subclass. (4) Among 12 patients tested, IgG and IgA antibodies showed a preference for histones 1 and 2B whereas IgM antibodies showed no consistent preference for individual histones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Fellows
- Department of Anatomy, University of Birmingham Medical School, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|