Influence of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on inspiratory muscle activity in obese subjects

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) can improve ventilation in obese subjects during the postoperative period after abdominal surgery. Compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP), NPPV was superior in correcting blood gas abnormalities both during the night-time and during the daytime in a subgroup of patients with the obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). However, as it is unknown, if and to what extent NPPV can unload the respiratory muscles in the face of the increased impedance of the respiratory system in obesity, this is what was investigated. Eighteen obese subjects with a body mass index > or = 40 kg x m(-2) were investigated during the daytime, which included five healthy controls (simple obesity (SO)), seven patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and six patients with the obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). Assisted PPV was performed with bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP), applied via a face mask. Inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) was set to 1.2 or 1.6 kPa and expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) was set to 0.5 kPa. Inspiratory muscle activity was measured as diaphragmatic pressure time product (PTPdi). Comparison of spontaneous breathing with BiPAP ventilation showed no significant difference in breathing pattern, although there was a tendency towards an increase in tidal volume (VT) in all three groups and a decrease in respiratory frequency (fR) in patients with OSA and OHS. End-tidal carbon dioxide (PET,CO2) with BiPAP was unchanged in SO and OSA, but was decreased in OHS. In contrast, inspiratory muscle activity was reduced by at least 40% in each group. This was indicated by a decrease in PTPdi with BiPAP 1.2/0.5 kPa from mean+/-SD 39+/-5 to 20+/-9 kPa x s (p<0.05) in SO, from 42+/-7 to 21+/-8 kPa x s (p<0.05) in OSA, and from 64+/-20 to 38+/-17 kPa x s (p<0.05) in OHS. With BiPAP 1.6/0.5 kPa, PTPdi was further reduced to 17+/-6 kPa x s in SO, and to 17+/-6 kPa x s in OSA, but not in OHS (40+/-22 kPa x s). We conclude that noninvasive assisted ventilation unloads the inspiratory muscles in patients with gross obesity.

[Effect of noninvasive ventilation on work of breathing in obesity]

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive ventilation with nose- or face-masks has been increasingly used in the past. The objective of mechanical ventilation is in addition to improve gas exchange to reduce breathing work. While improvement on breathing work has been shown mainly on normal-weight patients with different respiratory diseases, there is no existing data about the effect of noninvasive ventilation on the breathing work of patients with massive obesity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Assisted mask-ventilation with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) was carried out on 5 overweight control subjects (overweight controls), 7 overweight patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), 6 patients with obesitas-hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), and 7 overweight patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD). Inspiratory pressure assist (IPAP) was set to 12 or 16 cm H2O, exspiratory pressure (EPAP) was set to 5 cm H2O. All, subjects were massive overweight (body mass index [BMI] 42.2 +/- 5.8; range 31.8 to 55.4 kg/m2). Respiratory muscle activity was measured as esophageal pressure change (delta Pes) and transdiaphragmatic pressure change (delta Pdi) and calculated as pressure time integral.

RESULTS

With noninvasive ventilation respiratory muscle activity was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in all groups at least 40% compared to baseline values during spontaneous respiration.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive ventilation via face masks can efficiently reduce work of breathing in subjects with massive obesity.