Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Patients with a History of Oral Lichen Planus: Frequency and Outcomes

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is an inflammatory condition which affects the mucous membranes of the oral cavity. While previous studies have described the association between OLP and development of oral cavity cancer, there is currently a paucity of literature examining the impact of this disease on treatment response and prognosis. As such, we present a retrospective cohort study of Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) patients with a history of OLP to explore the course of their disease.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Using an IRB approved tertiary care registry of head and neck cancer patients, we identified patients with OCSCC who had a prior diagnosis of OLP. The number of new primary tumors, rates of local (LF), regional (RF) and distant failure (DF), as well as overall survival (OS) were assessed using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan Meier analysis for actuarial survival estimates.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients with OCSCC and OLP were identified with 109 individual OCSCC diagnoses. Patients had a median age of 67 years, were predominantly female (n = 42, 77.8%) and never smokers (n = 29, 53.7%) with a median follow up after diagnosis of OCSCC of 46.5 months. Nine patients (16.7%) had a history of immunosuppression of whom 6 (11.1%) had chronic steroid use for treatment of OLP. Within the cohort, 33 (61.1%) of OLP patients had a single OCSCC, 11 (20.4%) had 2, and 10 (18.5%) had >3 separate tumors develop. The most common oral cavity subsites were oral tongue (n = 42, 38.5%), followed by alveolar ridge (n = 14, 12.8%) and gingiva (n = 13, 11.9%). Papillary SCC subtype was identified in 10.1%. 92.7% of tumors (n = 101) were treated with primary surgery, with 23 (21.1%) receiving adjuvant RT and 10 of those patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Among resected patients, pathologic stages were predominantly T1-2 (84.1%) and N0 (50% vs N1 15.6% and N2a-3 34.4%). The mean RT dose was 62 Gy in 32 fractions. Locoregional failure occurred in 24.8% of cancers (n = 27), with local and regional failure occurring in 13.8% (n = 15) and 11% (n = 12) of lesions, respectively. Recurrence free survival at 3 and 5 years was 75% and 70.3%, respectively, with overall survival at 3 and 5 years of 71.1% and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with OCSCC and a history of OLP are predominantly female and never smokers. The tumors that develop in such patients are often early stage but a proportion of patients appear to be at higher risk of developing multiple malignancies and surveillance of this patient population to identify new tumors is crucial.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Head and Neck Cancer Re-Irradiation: Should >180˚ Carotid Encasement or Dermal Involvement Remain an Exclusion Criteria?

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) who present with carotid encasement (CE) >180˚ and skin involvement/abutment (SI/A) are often not considered for SBRT re-irradiation and are excluded from RTOG 3507. We reviewed our institutional experience of SBRT re-irradiation in such cases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

From an IRB approved registry, we identified previously irradiated HNC patients treated by SBRT with CE >180˚, SI/A, or use of bolus from 2013-2022. Toxicity as per CTCAEv4.0 and recurrence patterns were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of local progression was estimated with death as a competing risk. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were treated with SBRT to 37 sites with median follow up of 5.7 months (mo) (IQR 2.7-10.6). A total of 20 cases exhibited CE >180˚, 20 cases had SI/A, and 3 cases had both. The median time from prior radiation was 12.7 mo (range 1.9-144.1). Histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 89%. The site of SBRT was most commonly the neck (65%), 24% mucosa, 8% skull base, and 3% scalp. SBRT was delivered in 5 fractions every other day (62%) or 2 fractions per week (38%). 78% (N = 29) received ≥40 Gy while 22% (N = 8) received a lower dose. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 3 and 6 mo was 12.4% (95% CI 0.8-24.0) and 31.3% (95% CI 14.9-47.8), respectively. The median time of local and regional recurrence free survival was 7.0 and 4.9 mo. Median OS was 8.3 mo. Of the 20 cases with true SI, 40% (N = 8) completely resolved, 35% (N = 7) improved or had residual ulceration attributed to disease, and 25% (N = 5) had ulceration related to toxicity. There were no carotid bleeding events (CBE) related to SBRT, however 10% (N = 2) experienced fatal CBE related to progressive disease at 2.3 mo and 6.7 mo from SBRT. The rate of grade ≥2 treatment related skin toxicity was 19% (N = 7) and only occurred in those with pre-SBRT SI/A. These included a grade 2 neck wound and tracheostomy infection, a grade 3 infection, and two grade 3 soft tissue necrosis. One patient had cellulitis/meningitis related to scalp radiation, and one had an untreated SBRT wound as they transitioned to hospice. Dysphagia requiring PEG occurred in 5% (N = 2), one of which was related to CNX palsy. Six patients (17%) had post-SBRT nerve impairment including one each of grade 2 facial nerve paralysis, grade 2 brachial plexopathy, grade 3 CNVIII dysfunction, grade 3 CNX impairment, and two patients with grade 2 CNXII impairment.

CONCLUSION

SBRT for locally recurrent previously radiated HNC can provide effective local control in a patient population at high risk of morbidity and mortality from local disease progression. In patients who have >180˚ CE or SI/A, we observed non-trivial toxicity, but disease progression may have been more morbid. For appropriately counseled patients with limited treatment options, CE or SI/A may not be an absolute contraindication to SBRT re-irradiation.

Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) to Downstage Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma prior to Liver Transplant

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) marks the most successful treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients meeting Milan criteria. The process of reducing the disease burden of HCC patients not currently meeting criteria for OLT with local therapy is referred to as "downstaging" and has proven to be a feasible approach. RTOG 1112 recently demonstrated the efficacy and acceptable toxicity of liver SBRT for treating HCC. However, limited data currently exists describing the efficacy of SBRT for downstaging HCC patients and facilitating OLT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A single institution IRB approved prospective liver SBRT registry was surveyed for all patients outside of Milan criteria (1 lesion >5 cm; 2-3 lesions >3 cm) without vascular invasion or extrahepatic disease. Patients felt least likely to become OLT candidates with downstaging (age >80, >4 lesions, lesion >12 cm) were excluded. The primary endpoints were downstaging and OLT. Secondary endpoints were time to transplant, local control (LC), recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 38 HCC patients with a median age of 65 years (range 28 - 80) met inclusion criteria. Median follow up was 14 months (IQR 3 - 35). At baseline, median KPS was 80 (range 60 - 100) with 16 Child-Pugh (CP) A (42%), 13 CP B (34%), and 9 CP C patients (24%). All patients were outside of Milan criteria and 25 patients (66%) were outside of UCSF criteria at time of SBRT. No patients had extrahepatic disease or vascular invasion. Median number of lesions, largest tumor size, and total sum of lesions were 2 (range 1 - 4), 5.0 cm (IQR, 4.0 - 6.5), and 6.6 cm (IQR 5.9 - 9.2), respectively. Prior to SBRT, 22 patients (58%) had received non-SBRT local therapy. At time of SBRT a variety of dose fractionation schedules were selected with a median BED10 of 78 (IQR 62 - 100). Concurrent sorafenib was used in 2 patients (8%). Following completion of SBRT, 21 patients (55%) were successfully downstaged at a median 3.0 months (IQR 1.9 - 6.1) after treatment, most frequently secondary to decrease in size of the largest lesion (86%). Twelve patients (32%) proceeded to undergo OLT at a median 7 months (IQR 3 - 14) after SBRT and 105 days (IQR 18 - 344) following successful downstaging. Of the 25 patients initially exceeding UCSF criteria, 7 (28%) underwent OLT. Among those receiving OLT, 5 patients (42%) remain alive without evidence of disease, 3 patients (25%) have recurred, 3 patients (33%) died within 2 years from transplant complications, and 1 patient (8%) died from an unrelated cause. LC at 2 years was 83%. Median RFS and OS for the overall cohort were 7 months (95% CI 0 - 21) and 24 months (95% CI 11 - 36), respectively. Among the transplant recipients, the median OS was 37 months (95% CI 30 - 44) compared to 15 months (95% CI 6 - 23) among those not receiving transplant.

CONCLUSION

With careful patient selection, liver SBRT serves as a feasible downstaging method to facilitate OLT in HCC patients.

Definitive Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Gross Disease in Unresected Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

While surgery (with or without radioactive iodine (RAI)) is the mainstay of locoregional control in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), patients with unresectable disease present a clinical challenge. Uncontrolled disease in the neck can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality in DTC and obtaining locoregional control is vital to preserving quality of life and longevity. High dose definitive radiotherapy (RT) for gross disease in DTC is understudied. This study examines the efficacy of definitive RT in this setting.

MATERIALS/METHODS

From an IRB-approved registry of head and neck cancer cases treated at a tertiary care center over a period of 8 years (2014-2022), patients with incompletely resected or unresectable DTC including papillary, follicular, mixed, medullary, and poorly differentiated types were identified. All patients were treated to the neck and/or thyroid regions with visible gross disease to a definitive dose of radiation. The primary endpoint was local control within the radiated portal with a secondary endpoint of locoregional control within the neck.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were identified, of whom 74.2% were Caucasian. Fourteen were female (45.2%), and 17 (54.8%) were male. The median age was 68 years (range 26-90) and the median follow-up was 31 months. Histologically, 19 (61.3%) cases were papillary, 4 (12.9%) were follicular, 2 (6.5%) were mixed, 3 (9.7%) were medullary, and 3 (9.7%) were poorly differentiated. Among patients with non-medullary DTC 18 (69.2%) received prior RAI. Twelve patients were treated with radiation at initial diagnosis, while 19 patients were treated at the time of recurrence; two patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (90.3%) were treated with IMRT and 3 (9.7%) were treated with SBRT. The median dose to the gross disease was 66 Gy (range 30-70.4) in 32 fractions (range 5-35). Overall, 5 patients (16.1%) experienced a locoregional failure after RT and all experienced failure in the RT portal. The actuarial infield control/locoregional control of radiation therapy at 3 and 5 years was 84.8% and 74.2%, respectively. Overall survival at 3 and 5 years was 68.5% and 47.4%, respectively. Among patients who had a locoregional failure after RT, 2 patients were salvaged with systemic therapy, 2 patients with surgery, and 1 patient with SBRT re-irradiation (40 Gy/5 fractions). The patient salvaged with SBRT remains without disease 8 months post-RT.

CONCLUSION

Definitive radiotherapy is a highly effective strategy to obtain durable control of unresected DTC. It should be standard for unresected disease and considered as a viable alternative for patients with borderline resectable disease for whom resection would be highly morbid.

Frameless Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: An Institutional Series of 145 Cases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Cobalt-60 stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) typically involves single fraction treatment with frame immobilization. However, large tumor size, proximity to critical structures, and prior radiation treatment sometimes necessitate fractionated SRS with mask immobilization. We present a large institutional experience with fractionated mask-based SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this single-institution, IRB-approved study, all patients treated with mask-based fractionated SRS for brain metastases from March 2017 to January 2023 were identified. The primary outcomes were 1- and 2-year local control (LC) by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with a total of 145 metastases were treated. The median follow-up time was seven months. The median age at treatment was 64.1 years (range: 26-95 years). 55.9% of patients were female. The most common primary tumors were breast (25.5%), non-small cell lung (23.4%), small-cell lung (8.3%), and melanoma (8.3%). For most cases (59.3%), the indication for fractionation was retreatment. Large size (28.3%), critical location (9.7%), and medical comorbidity (2.1%) were other indications. For all cases, the mean maximal linear size was 34.9 mm and mean target volume was 15.6 cc. For cases fractionated due to size, the mean size was 43.9 mm and mean target volume was 23.8 cc. Median total dose was 2,700 cGy (range: 1,620-3,000), and median dose per fraction (fx) was 600 cGy (range: 405-900). The most common prescriptions were 3,000 cGy/5 fx (40.0% of patients) and 2500 cGy in 500 cGy per fraction (37.2% of patients). Mean maximum dose was 4,833 cGy (range: 2,920-7,500). For 75.2% of treatments, the prescription isodose line was 50 to 59% (mean, 56.9%). Target coverage was 100% in all but one case (99%). For lesions near the brainstem, mean brainstem maximum point dose (MPD) was 9.3 Gy ± 9.8 Gy and brainstem mean dose was 3.3 Gy ± 3.3 Gy. For lesions near the optic pathway, mean optic nerve MPD was 14.4 Gy ± 9.2, optic nerve mean dose was 6.4 Gy ± 5.4 Gy, mean optic chiasm MPD was 11.7 Gy ± 7.9 Gy, and optic chiasm mean dose was 5.4 Gy ± 4.7 Gy. 1-year LC was 88.2% and 2-year LC was 80.4%. When retreatments were excluded, 1-year LC was 98.0% and 2-year LC was 98.0%. 18% of patients had acute grade 1-2 toxicities (fatigue, headache, nausea, and/or alopecia), and one patient had acute grade 3 fatigue. There was no other grade 3+ acute toxicities. 14% of patients had grade 1-2 radiation necrosis (RN); there were no cases of grade 3+ RN.

CONCLUSION

Cobalt-60 frameless fractionated SRS for brain metastases offers excellent local control, rigorous sparing of critical structures, and minimal toxicity. Frameless fractionated SRS should be considered for large, retreated, or critically located metastases.

Using kV Triggered Imaging and Liver Dome Position to Reduce the Dosimetric Error Caused by Breath Hold Variability for Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In a previous study, we demonstrated that manual gating using kV triggered imaging and liver dome position can reduce targeting errors caused by breath hold variability for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In this study, we quantified the dosimetric error caused by breath hold variability and investigated the effect of liver dome gating on reducing dosimetric error.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Twenty-five liver SBRT patients treated with deep inspiration breath-hold were included in this IRB approved study. Volumetric modulated arc therapy was used to deliver 30-60 Gy in 1-5 fractions. To verify the breath-hold reproducibility during treatment, a KV triggered image was acquired at the beginning of each breath-hold. The liver dome position was visually compared with the expected upper/lower liver boundaries created by expanding/contracting the liver contour 5mm in the superior-inferior direction. If the liver dome position was within the boundaries, delivery continued; otherwise, beam was held manually and the patient was instructed to take another breath hold until the liver dome position was within boundaries. To calculate delivered dose, for each fraction, the treatment plan was divided into sub-beams, each corresponding to one breath hold using delivery log files. The triggered images were registered to the planning CT to determine the liver position during each breath hold. Dose delivered during each breath hold was calculated by shifting the isocenter of the sub-beam according to the liver position. Breath holds discarded by gating were excluded since no dose was delivered during these breath holds. Delivered fractional doses were compared with planned fractional doses using GTV D99 and liver Dmean. To estimate delivered dose without gating, the first "corrective" breath hold taken after the discarded breath holds was replaced with the prior discarded breath hold and dose calculation was repeated.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eleven triggered images from 91 treatment fractions were analyzed. Without gating, in 11 of the 91 fractions from 7 of the 25 patients, delivered GTV D99 reduced > 0.50 Gy from planned value (range 0.51-1.68 Gy, 3-10% of planned fractional GTV D99). Liver dome gating was able to detect/exclude irreproducible breath holds in 8 of the 11 fractions, increasing the delivered GTV D99 by 0.70 Gy per fraction on average (range 0.21-1.63 Gy). With liver dome gating, delivered fractional GTV D99 was comparable to planned value for all fractions (12.96 +/- 5.19 Gy vs 13.04 +/- 5.18 Gy, p > 0.05). Liver mean dose was not affected by breath hold variability or gating. Fractional liver Dmean was 2.26 +/- 1.19 Gy from plan, 2.27 +/- 1.21 Gy for delivery with gating and 2.27 +/- 1.20 Gy for delivery without gating.

CONCLUSION

Breath hold variability may cause tumor underdose. Liver dome gating using kV triggered imaging reduces dosimetric error and ensures tumor coverage for liver SBRT.

Partial Tongue Sparing without Marginal Failures: The Dosimetric Advantages for Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Due to a lack of internal barriers, many radiation oncologists believe whole tongue (WT) irradiation is warranted in the adjuvant setting for oral tongue cancer. Our institutional practice is to include the resection bed and flap with a 5-10 mm margin, attempting to spare unaffected oral tongue. We hypothesize that partial tongue (PT) irradiation, when feasible, results in decreased dose to surrounding normal structures without an increased risk of local recurrence (LR).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue treated with adjuvant IMRT between 2010 and 2021 were collected from an IRB approved database. PT was defined as <80% of residual tongue in the clinical target volume (CTV). Recurrence was deemed local if in the tongue or floor of mouth, and in field if within the CTV or marginal if outside of CTV. Mean dose to mandible, pharyngeal constrictors, and oral cavity were evaluated. Comparisons between groups were made using parametric one-way ANOVA. Multivariable linear regression was used to predict mean radiation dose. Local control and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients are included with median follow up 34.1 months (IQR 13.5-64.6). Radiation dose was 48-72 Gy in 24-36 fractions, most commonly 60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions (84.6%). All were treated to oral cavity, and neck irradiation included bilateral 96 (72%), unilateral 31 (24%), and none 3 (4%). PT sparing was feasible in 91 (70%) and 39 (30%) required WT. Primary tumor stage in PT included 20 pT1, 50 pT2, 17 pT3, and 4 pT4, and WT included 3 pT1, 8 pT2, 15 pT3, and 13 pT4. 3-year local control for PT and WT was 96% and 87%, respectively. LR occurred in 14 patients overall (10.8%), 6.6% (6) of patients treated with PT and 20.5% (8) treated with WT (p = 0.072). Of the LR for PT, stage was 2 pT1, 3 pT2, and 1 pT3, and all occurred within the radiation field. Of the LR for WT, stage was 1 each of pT1 and pT2, 2 pT3, and 4 pT4. Overall survival was 57%, regional and distant recurrence was each 17.7%. Dosimetric analysis for PT vs WT is described in Table 1, demonstrating lower mean dose when the primary tumor CTV is limited to PT. Unilateral neck irradiation also resulted in a lower mandible [-8.5 Gy (-11.2 - -5.8)], pharyngeal constrictor [-14.3 Gy (-18.1 - -10.5)], and oral cavity [-9.0 Gy (-13.0 - -5.0)] dose (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Limiting the primary tumor CTV to PT for adjuvant radiotherapy resulted in significant sparing of the mandible and pharyngeal constrictors, and a routinely lower oral cavity mean dose of ≥3.5 Gy. There was a low risk of LR when implementing PT, and all LR occurred in field. Given the increased sparing of normal structures, and low risk of LR outside of PT radiation field, sparing a portion of unaffected oral tongue should be considered.

Five-year outcomes of sparing level IB in node-positive, human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma: A safety and efficacy analysis

INTRODUCTION

The conformality of modern intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows avoidance of the submandibular glands (SMG) in select patients, potentially improving late xerostomia. This study explores the safety and efficacy of this approach in select oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) patients.

METHODS

Patients with T1-2N+ human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated OPC treated with definitive IMRT at one institution from 2009 to 2014 were identified. Patients were divided into 3 groups: bilateral level IB targeted (A, n = 16), a single level IB targeted (B, n = 61), and bilateral IB spared (C, n = 9). Outcomes were reviewed to identify the rate of level IB regional recurrence. Odds ratios were calculated for xerostomia between groups.

RESULTS

Level Ib was targeted in 93 instances (54.1%) and avoided in 79 instances (45.9%). Mean SMG doses were significantly lower when level IB was spared compared to when targeted (37.5 Gy vs 67.5 Gy; P < 0.0001). Median doses to oral cavity decreased with increasing level Ib sparing (40.7 Gy [A] vs 35.4 Gy [B] vs 30.7 [C]; P = 0.002). The rate of late grade ≥2 xerostomia was significantly lower in patients with bilateral 1b sparing (53% in A vs 0% in C; P = 0.007). Sparing 1b unilaterally resulted in a non-significant decrease in late grade ≥2 xerostomia (P = 0.181). No regional failures were identified in levels IB (median follow up = 59.3 months).

CONCLUSION

Sparing level IB is safe in T1-2N+ HPV+ OPC. Avoiding level Ib translates into significantly lower SMG and oral cavity doses. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and the impact of this technique.