To fight or not to fight: activation of the mPFC during decision to engage in aggressive behavior after ethanol consumption in a novel murine model

RATIONALE

Alcohol consumption is a common antecedent of aggressive behavior. The effects of alcohol on the decision to engage in aggression in preference over pro-social interaction are hypothesized to arise from augmented function within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC).

OBJECTIVE

In a newly developed procedure, we studied social decision-making in male C57BL/6 J mice based on preferentially seeking access to either sociosexual interactions with a female partner or the opportunity to attack an intruder male. While deciding to engage in aggressive vs. sociosexual behavior, corresponding neural activation was assessed via c-Fos immunoreactivity in cortical, amygdaloid and tegmental regions of interest. A further objective was to investigate how self-administered alcohol impacted social choice.

METHODS

During repeated confrontations with an intruder male in their home cage, experimental mice engaged in species-specific sequence of pursuit, threat, and attack behavior within < 2 min. Mice were then conditioned to respond at one of two separate illuminated operanda in an experimental chamber (octagon) attached to their home cage; completion of 10 responses (fixed ratio 10; FR10) was reinforced by access to either a female or a male intruder which were presented in the resident's home cage. Brains were harvested following choice between the concurrently available aggressive and sociosexual options and processed for c-Fos immunoreactivity across 10 brain regions. In two separate groups, mice were trained to rapidly self-administer ethanol prior to a social choice trial in order to examine the effects of alcohol on social choice, sociosexual, aggressive acts and postures, and concurrent c-Fos activity in the mPFC and limbic regions.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Eight out of 65 mice consistently chose to engage in aggressive behavior in preference to sociosexual contact with a female when each outcome was concurrently available. Self-administered alcohol (experiment 1: 1.2 ± 0.02 g/kg; experiment 2: 0, 1.0, 1.5, and 1.8 g/kg) increased responding for the aggressive option in mice that previously opted predominantly for access to sociosexual interactions with the female. When choosing the aggressive, but not the sociosexual option, the prelimbic area of the mPFC revealed increased c-Fos activity, guiding future detailed inquiry into the neural mechanisms for aggressive choice.

Neurobiological Bases of Alcohol Consumption After Social Stress

The urge to seek and consume excessive alcohol is intensified by prior experiences with social stress, and this cascade can be modeled under systematically controlled laboratory conditions in rodents and non-human primates. Adaptive coping with intermittent episodes of social defeat stress often transitions to maladaptive responses to traumatic continuous stress, and alcohol consumption may become part of coping responses. At the circuit level, the neural pathways subserving stress coping intersect with those for alcohol consumption. Increasingly discrete regions and connections within the prefrontal cortex, the ventral and dorsal striatum, thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei, tegmental areas as well as brain stem structures begin to be identified as critical for reacting to and coping with social stress while seeking and consuming alcohol. Several candidate molecules that modulate signals within these neural connections have been targeted in order to reduce excessive drinking and relapse. In spite of some early clinical failures, neuropeptides such as CRF, opioids, or oxytocin continue to be examined for their role in attenuating stress-escalated drinking. Recent work has focused on neural sites of action for peptides and steroids, most likely in neuroinflammatory processes as a result of interactive effects of episodic social stress and excessive alcohol seeking and drinking.

Don't Ditch the Laptop Just Yet: A Direct Replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer's (2014) Study 1 Plus Mini Meta-Analyses Across Similar Studies

In this direct replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer's (2014) Study 1, participants watched a lecture while taking notes with a laptop (n = 74) or longhand (n = 68). After a brief distraction and without the opportunity to study, they took a quiz. As in the original study, laptop participants took notes containing more words spoken verbatim by the lecturer and more words overall than did longhand participants. However, laptop participants did not perform better than longhand participants on the quiz. Exploratory meta-analyses of eight similar studies echoed this pattern. In addition, in both the original study and our replication, higher word count was associated with better quiz performance, and higher verbatim overlap was associated with worse quiz performance, but the latter finding was not robust in our replication. Overall, results do not support the idea that longhand note taking improves immediate learning via better encoding of information.