Association of baseline factors with 1-year outcomes in the SB11-ranibizumab equivalence trial: A post hoc analysis

PURPOSE

To identify baseline factors associated with 1-year outcomes when treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 or reference ranibizumab (rRBZ), and to compare efficacy of the two products within subgroups judged to be clinically relevant.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of a prospective, equivalence phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) METHODS: 705 patients with nAMD were randomized 1:1 to receive SB11 or rRBZ for 48 weeks. Pooled and randomized groups were used to identify baseline factors associated with clinical outcomes at Week 52 using multiple linear regression models. Significant factors identified in regression analyses were confirmed in analyses of variance. Subgroup analyses comparing best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes between SB11 and rRBZ were conducted.

RESULTS

634 (89.9%) participants completed the 52-week visit. Regression analyses showed that younger age, lower BCVA, and smaller total lesion area at baseline were associated with greater BCVA gain at Week 52, while older age, lower BCVA, and thicker central subfield thickness (CST) at baseline were predictors of greater CST reduction in the pooled group. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that BCVA outcomes appeared comparable for the SB11 and rRBZ groups.

CONCLUSION

Post hoc analyses of the SB11-rRBZ equivalence study showed that baseline age, BCVA, CST, and total lesion area were prognostic factors for visual and anatomical outcomes of nAMD, while subgroup analyses demonstrated comparable results for SB11 and rRBZ. Collectively, the results appear comparable to similar RCTs of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor reference products for nAMD and strengthen confidence in the biosimilarity of SB11.

Safe Viewing of Solar Eclipses

This JAMA Patient Page describes solar eclipses and how to view them safely.

Retinal characteristics in eyes with pathologic myopia among individuals self-identifying as Black

OBJECTIVE

Investigate retinal characteristics of pathologic myopia (PM) among patients self-identifying as Black.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort single-institution retrospective medical record review.

METHODS

Adult patients between January 2005 and December 2014 with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes consistent with PM and given 5-year follow-up were evaluated. The Study Group consisted of patients self-identifying as Black, and the Comparison Group consisted of those not self-identifying as Black. Ocular features at study baseline and 5-year follow-up visit were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 428 patients with PM, 60 (14%) self-identified as Black and 18 (30%) had baseline and 5-year follow-up visits. Of the remaining 368 patients, 63 were in the Comparison Group. For the study (n = 18) and Comparison Group (n = 29), median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) baseline visual acuity was 20/40 (20/25, 20/50) and 20/32 (20/25, 20/50) in the better-seeing eye and 20/70 (20/50, 20/1400) and 20/100 (20/50, 20/200), respectively, in the worse-seeing eye. In the eyes that did not have choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the study and Comparison Group, median study baseline optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness was 196 μm (169, 306 μm) and 225 μm (191, 280 μm), respectively, in the better-seeing eye and 208 μm (181, 260 μm) and 194 μm (171, 248 μm), respectively, in the worse-seeing eye. Baseline prevalence of CNV was 1 Study Group eye (3%) and 20 Comparison Group eyes (34%). By the 5-year visit, zero (0%) and 4 (15%) additional eyes had CNV in the study and Comparison Group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the prevalence and incidence of CNV may be lower in patients with PM self-identifying as Black when compared with individuals of other races.

Severe Intraocular Inflammation Following Intravitreal Faricimab

Importance

Monitoring for and reporting potential cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in clinical practice despite limited occurrences in clinical trials, including experiences with relatively new intravitreal agents, such as brolucizumab, pegcetacoplan, or faricimab, helps balance potential benefits and risks of these agents.

Objective

To provide descriptions of 3 initially culture-negative cases of acute, severe, posterior-segment IOI events occurring within the same month following intravitreal faricimab injections at a single institution.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this case series, 3 patients manifesting acute, severe IOI following intravitreal injection of faricimab were identified between September 20, 2023, and October 20, 2023.

Exposure

Faricimab, 6 mg (0.05 mL of 120 mg/mL solution), for neovascular age-related macular degeneration among patients previously treated with aflibercept; 1 patient also had prior exposure to bevacizumab.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Visual acuity, vitreous taps for bacterial or fungal cultures, and retinal imaging.

Results

All 3 patients received intravitreal faricimab injections between September 20 and October 20, 2023, from 2 different lot numbers (expiration dates, July 2025) at 3 locations of 1 institution among 3 of 19 retina physicians. Visual acuities with correction were 20/63 OS for patient 1, 20/40 OD for patient 2, and 20/20 OS for patient 3 prior to injection. All 3 patients developed acute, severe inflammation involving the anterior and posterior segment within 3 to 4 days after injection, with visual acuities of hand motion OS, counting fingers OD, and hand motion OS, respectively. Two patients were continuing faricimab treatment while 1 patient was initiating faricimab treatment. All received intravitreal ceftazidime, 2.2 mg/0.1 mL, and vancomycin, 1 mg/0.1 mL, immediately following vitreous taps. All vitreous tap culture results were negative. One patient underwent vitrectomy 1 day following presentation. Intraoperative vitreous culture grew 1 colony of Staphylococcus epidermidis, judged a likely contaminant by infectious disease specialists. All symptoms resolved within 1 month; visual acuities with correction were 20/100 OS for patient 1, 20/50 OD for patient 2, and 20/30 OS for patient 3.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series, 3 patients with acute, severe IOI within 1 month at 3 different locations among 3 ophthalmologists of 1 institution following intravitreal faricimab could represent some unknown storage or handling problem. However, this cluster suggests such inflammatory events may be more common than anticipated from faricimab trial reports, emphasizing the continued need for vigilance to detect and report such cases following regulatory approval.

Biosimilars of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for ophthalmic diseases: A review

The development of intravitreally injected biologic medicines (biologics) acting against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with common VEGF-driven retinal diseases. The relatively high cost of branded agents, however, represents a financial burden for most healthcare systems and patients, likely resulting in impaired access to treatment and poorer clinical outcomes for some patients. Biosimilar medicines (biosimilars) are clinically equivalent, potentially economic alternatives to reference products. Biosimilars approved by leading health authorities have been demonstrated to be similar to the reference product in a comprehensive comparability exercise, generating the totality of evidence necessary to support analytical, pre-clinical, and clinical biosimilarity. Anti-VEGF biosimilars have been entering the field of ophthalmology in the US since 2022. We review regulatory and scientific concepts of biosimilars, the biosimilar development landscape in ophthalmology, with a specific focus on anti-VEGF biosimilars, and discuss opportunities and challenges facing the uptake of biosimilars.

High Myopia Normative Database of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness to Detect Myopic Glaucoma in a Chinese Population

PURPOSE

To develop and validate the performance of a high myopia (HM)-specific normative database of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness in differentiating HM from highly myopic glaucoma (HMG).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional multicenter study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1367 Chinese participants (2325 eyes) with nonpathologic HM or HMG were included from 4 centers. After quality control, 1108 eyes from 694 participants with HM were included in the normative database; 459 eyes from 408 participants (323 eyes with HM and 136 eyes with HMG) and 322 eyes from 197 participants (131 eyes with HM and 191 eyes with HMG) were included in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. Only HMG eyes with an intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg were included.

METHODS

The pRNFL thickness was measured with swept-source (SS) OCT. Four strategies of pRNFL-specified values were examined, including global and quadrantic pRNFL thickness below the lowest fifth or the lowest first percentile of the normative database.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the HM-specific normative database for detecting HMG.

RESULTS

Setting the fifth percentile of the global pRNFL thickness as the threshold, using the HM-specific normative database, we achieved an accuracy of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.95) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.89), and, using the first percentile as the threshold, we acheived an accuracy of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) in detecting HMG in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The fifth percentile of the global pRNFL thickness achieved high sensitivities of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.82) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81) and specificities of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00) in the internal and external validation datasets, respectively. Compared with the built-in database of the OCT device, the HM-specific normative database showed a higher sensitivity and specificity than the corresponding pRNFL thickness below the fifth or first percentile (P < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The HM-specific normative database is more capable of detecting HMG eyes than the SS OCT built-in database, which may be an effective tool for differential diagnosis between HMG and HM.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Visual acuity time in range: a novel concept to describe consistency in treatment response in diabetic macular oedema

OBJECTIVE

To assess 'time in range' as a novel measure of treatment response in diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of the Protocol T randomised clinical trial included 660 individuals with centre-involved DMO and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score ≤78-≥24 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/32-20/320). Study participants received intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg, repackaged (compounded) bevacizumab 1.25 mg, or ranibizumab 0.3 mg given up to every 4 weeks using defined retreatment criteria. Mean time in range was calculated using a BCVA letter score threshold of ≥69 (20/40 or better; minimum driving requirement in many regions), with sensitivity analyses using BCVA thresholds from 100 to 0 (20/10 to 20/800) in 1-letter increments.

RESULTS

Time in range was defined as either the absolute or relative duration above a predefined BCVA threshold, measured in weeks or as a percentage of time, respectively. Using a BCVA letter score threshold of ≥69 (20/40 or better), the least squares mean time in range (adjusted for baseline BCVA) in Year 1 was 41.2 weeks with intravitreal aflibercept, 4.0 weeks longer (95% CI: 1.7, 6.3; p = 0.002) than bevacizumab and 3.6 weeks longer (1.3, 5.9; p = 0.004) than ranibizumab. Overall, mean time in range was numerically longer for intravitreal aflibercept for all BCVA letter score thresholds between 92 and 30 (20/20 to 20/250). In the Day 365-728 analysis, time in range was 3.9 (1.3, 6.5) and 2.4 (0.0, 4.9) weeks longer with intravitreal aflibercept vs bevacizumab and vs ranibizumab (p = 0.011 and 0.106), respectively.

CONCLUSION

BCVA time in range may represent another way to describe visual outcomes and potential impact on vision-related functions over time for patients with DMO and provide a better understanding, for physicians and patients, of the consistency of treatment efficacy.

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Estimating Best-Corrected Visual Acuity From Fundus Photographs in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema

Importance

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is a measure used to manage diabetic macular edema (DME), sometimes suggesting development of DME or consideration of initiating, repeating, withholding, or resuming treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Using artificial intelligence (AI) to estimate BCVA from fundus images could help clinicians manage DME by reducing the personnel needed for refraction, the time presently required for assessing BCVA, or even the number of office visits if imaged remotely.

Objective

To evaluate the potential application of AI techniques for estimating BCVA from fundus photographs with and without ancillary information.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Deidentified color fundus images taken after dilation were used post hoc to train AI systems to perform regression from image to BCVA and to evaluate resultant estimation errors. Participants were patients enrolled in the VISTA randomized clinical trial through 148 weeks wherein the study eye was treated with aflibercept or laser. The data from study participants included macular images, clinical information, and BCVA scores by trained examiners following protocol refraction and VA measurement on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts.

Main Outcomes

Primary outcome was regression evaluated by mean absolute error (MAE); the secondary outcome included percentage of predictions within 10 letters, computed over the entire cohort as well as over subsets categorized by baseline BCVA, determined from baseline through the 148-week visit.

Results

Analysis included 7185 macular color fundus images of the study and fellow eyes from 459 participants. Overall, the mean (SD) age was 62.2 (9.8) years, and 250 (54.5%) were male. The baseline BCVA score for the study eyes ranged from 73 to 24 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/40 to 20/320). Using ResNet50 architecture, the MAE for the testing set (n = 641 images) was 9.66 (95% CI, 9.05-10.28); 33% of the values (95% CI, 30%-37%) were within 0 to 5 letters and 28% (95% CI, 25%-32%) within 6 to 10 letters. For BCVA of 100 letters or less but more than 80 letters (20/10 to 20/25, n = 161) and 80 letters or less but more than 55 letters (20/32 to 20/80, n = 309), the MAE was 8.84 letters (95% CI, 7.88-9.81) and 7.91 letters (95% CI, 7.28-8.53), respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

This investigation suggests AI can estimate BCVA directly from fundus photographs in patients with DME, without refraction or subjective visual acuity measurements, often within 1 to 2 lines on an ETDRS chart, supporting this AI concept if additional improvements in estimates can be achieved.

Biosimilar SB11 versus reference ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year phase III randomised clinical trial outcomes

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To provide longer-term data on efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 compared with the reference ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

Setting: Multicentre. Design: Randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, phase III equivalence study. Patient population: ≥50 years old participants with nAMD (n=705), one 'study eye'.

INTERVENTION

1:1 randomisation to monthly intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg SB11 or RBZ. Main outcome measures: Visual efficacy endpoints, safety, immunogenicity and PK up to 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Baseline and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Of 705 randomised participants (SB11: n=351; RBZ: n=354), 634 participants (89.9%; SB11: n=307; RBZ: n=327) completed the study until week 52. Previously reported equivalence in primary efficacy remained stable up to week 52 and were comparable between SB11 and RBZ. The adjusted treatment difference between SB11 and RBZ in full analysis set at week 52 of change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity was -0.6 letters (90% CI -2.1 to 0.9) and of change from baseline in central subfield thickness was -14.9 µm (95% CI -25.3 to -4.5). The incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB11: 32.0% vs RBZ: 29.7%) and serious ocular TEAE (SB11: 2.9% vs RBZ: 2.3%) appeared comparable between treatment groups, and no new safety concerns were observed. The PK and immunogenicity profiles were comparable, with a 4.2% and 5.5% cumulative incidence of antidrug antibodies up to week 52 for SB11 and RBZ, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer-term results of this study further support the biosimilarity established between SB11 and RBZ.

Immunogenicity With Ranibizumab Biosimilar SB11 (Byooviz) and Reference Product Lucentis and Association With Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

SB11 and reference ranibizumab (RBZ) are monoclonal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A antibodies approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and other retinal diseases. The association of ranibizumab immunogenicity and treatment outcomes in patients with nAMD is unclear but relevant regarding concerns about immunogenicity of anti-VEGF biological products.

Objective

To examine the association of immunogenicity to ranibizumab products (SB11 and RBZ) with efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group phase 3 equivalence study with participants from 75 centers in 9 countries conducted from March 14, 2018, to December 9, 2019. Included were participants 50 years or older with nAMD and active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization lesions.

Interventions

Intravitreal injection of SB11 or RBZ, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks through week 48.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Serum antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were analyzed during the study period until week 52 to measure immunogenicity. Analyses were performed on immunogenicity (overall ADA positivity) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Adverse events associated with intraocular inflammation (IOI) and serum ranibizumab levels were compared between overall ADA-positive and ADA-negative participants.

Results

A total of 705 participants (mean [SD] age, 74.1 [8.5] years; 403 female individuals [57.2%]) were included in the study. The overall incidence of ADA-positivity was 32 of 657 (4.9%) at week 52. The least-squares mean (SE) differences between overall ADA-positive and ADA-negative participants up to week 52 for BCVA and CST, respectively, were 1.6 (2.2) letters (95% CI, -2.7 to 5.8; P = .46) and 3 (13) μm (95% CI, -23 to 29; P = .83). IOI-related events occurred in 1 of 32 overall ADA-positive participants (3.1%) and 4 of 620 overall ADA-negative participants (0.6%). Mean (SD) serum ranibizumab concentrations over time were slightly lower in overall ADA-positive participants compared with those of ADA-negative participants, with a maximum value of 1389.3 (875.4) pg/mL at week 16 vs 1665.4 (1124.0) pg/mL at week 36, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this post hoc analysis of an equivalence trial suggest that immunogenicity was not associated with efficacy and safety of SB11 and RBZ in participants with nAMD. With a low overall ADA incidence, no clear association was identified between overall ADA positivity and pharmacokinetics. These findings support the biosimilarity of SB11 and RBZ, with no safety concern identified for SB11 vs RBZ associated with immunogenicity.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03150589.

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Based on Non-ICGA Criteria in White Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To determine prevalence of probable polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) among White patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using non-indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) criteria DESIGN: Multicenter, multinational, retrospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

A total of 208 treatment-naive eyes from Hispanic and non-Hispanic White individuals diagnosed with nAMD were included. All underwent color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FFA). De-identified images of study eyes were sent to 2 groups of graders. Group 1 reviewed CFP, OCT, and FFA to confirm nAMD diagnosis. Group 2 reviewed CFP and OCT to determine highly suggestive features for PCV. Probable PCV diagnosis defined as the presence of ≥2 of 4 highly suggestive features for PCV: notched or fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED) on CFP, sharply-peaked PED, notched PED, and hyperreflective ring on OCT.

RESULTS

Eleven eyes were excluded because of poor image quality (6) or non-nAMD diagnosis (5). Of 197 eligible eyes (197 patients), the mean age (SD) was 78.8 years (8.9), 44.2% were men, 26.4% were Hispanic, and 73.6% were non-Hispanic White individuals; 41.1%, 23.4%, 9.1%, and 2.5% had ≥1, ≥2, ≥3, and 4 highly suggestive features. Results showed that 23.4% (95% CI, 17.6%-29.9%) had probable PCV diagnosis. Predominantly occult CNV was more frequently found in probable PCV than nAMD subgroup (84.8% vs 64.9%, P = .01). Hispanic White individuals had a lower prevalence of probable PCV than non-Hispanic White individuals (9.6% vs 28.2%, P = .006) CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that probable PCV occurs between 17.6% and 29.9% in White individuals with nAMD, and more commonly in non-Hispanic than in Hispanic White individuals.

Optical Coherence Tomography Features for Identifying Posttreatment Complete Polypoidal Regression in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

PURPOSE

To determine accuracy and relative risk (RR) of posttreatment optical coherence tomography (OCT) features in identifying complete or incomplete polypoidal regression in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

DESIGN

Validity analysis.

METHODS

Treatment-naive PCV eyes undergoing OCT and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) at baseline and posttreatment were included. Two graders confirmed diagnosis and identified posttreatment complete or incomplete regression on ICGA. Two other graders classified OCT characteristics of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) (polypoidal lesion) based on 5 prespecified features: "A," no PED; "B," PED with internal homogeneous reflectivity with predominant "BUN" (blended retinal pigment epithelium with underlying structure) sign; "C," PED with internal homogeneous reflectivity with minimal "BUN"; "D," heterogeneous PED; and "E," PED with hyporeflectivity.

RESULTS

Among 130 polypoidal lesions (65 pretreatment and 65 posttreatment) of 39 PCV eyes (39 patients; 54% female; mean age±SD: 64.6±8.2), all pretreatment lesions showed feature D on OCT. Posttreatment lesions with complete regression (31 lesions) showed OCT features A, B, C, D, and E in 32%, 45%, 13%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. Posttreatment lesions with incomplete regression (34 lesions) showed OCT features A, B, C, D, and E in 0%, 6%, 15%, 79%, and 0%, respectively. Presence of either feature A or B had highest accuracy (86%; 95% confidence interval: 75%-93%); 77% sensitivity; 94% specificity; RR 5.0 (3.5-7.1, P<0.001) for complete regression. Presence of feature D had highest accuracy (85%; 95% confidence interval: 74%-92%); 79% sensitivity; 90% specificity; RR 4.6 (3.0-6.9, P<0.001) for incomplete regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Without ICGA, OCT features could provide high accuracy in identifying posttreatment complete or incomplete polypoidal regression in PCV.

Correlation of Change in Macular Thickness With Change in Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema: Post Hoc Analysis of VISTA and VIVID Trials

Purpose: To assess the correlation between the change in central subfield thickness (CST) and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with fixed-dosing intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI). Methods: This post hoc analysis of the VISTA and VIVID randomized controlled clinical trials, in which 862 eyes with central-involved DME were randomly assigned to IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4; 290 eyes), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8; 286 eyes), or macular laser (286 eyes) and followed through 100 weeks. Correlations between the change in CST and change in BCVA from baseline to weeks 12, 52, and 100 were assessed using the Pearson correlation. Results: The respective correlations ( r [95% CI]) at weeks 12, 52, and 100 were −0.39 (−0.49 to −0.29), −0.27 (−0.38 to −0.15), and −0.30 (−0.41 to −0.17) in the 2q4 arm and −0.28 (−0.39 to −0.17), −0.29 (−0.41 to −0.17), and −0.33 (−0.44 to −0.20) in the 2q8 arm. Linear regression analysis of the correlation at week 100, adjusted for relevant baseline factors, showed CST changes accounted for 17% of the variance in BCVA changes; every 100-µm decrease in CST was associated with a 1.2-letter increase in BCVA ( P = .001). Conclusions: Correlations between the change in CST and change in BCVA after 2q4 or 2q8 fixed-dosing IAI for DME were modest. Although a change in CST might be important in determining the need for antivascular endothelial growth factor for DME at follow-up, it was not a good surrogate for VA outcomes.

Correlation between change in central subfield thickness and change in visual acuity in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion: post hoc analysis of COPERNICUS, GALILEO, and VIBRANT

Purpose

Assess correlation between change in central subfield thickness (CST) and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) that received intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAI).

Methods

Post hoc analysis of COPERNICUS and GALILEO trials for CRVO and VIBRANT trial for BRVO with relationships determined using Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

In COPERNICUS, correlations (r) between change in CST and change in BCVA from baseline at weeks 12, 24, 52, and 100 were −0.36 (95% CI: −0.52, −0.18; P < 0.001), −0.38 (95% CI: −0.53, −0.20; P < 0.001), −0.44 (95% CI: −0.58, −0.27; P < 0.001), and −0.41 (95% CI: −0.56, −0.23; P < 0.001), respectively. CST changes accounted for only 21% of the variance in BCVA changes; every 100-µm decrease in CST was associated with a 2.1-letter increase in BCVA (P = 0.003). Similar findings were noted for GALILEO (r, −0.45 to −0.23) and VIBRANT (r, −0.36 to −0.32) trials.

Conclusion

In eyes treated with IAI for macular edema due to RVO, correlation between change in CST and change in BCVA was weak to moderate. While change in CST may be helpful in determining the need for anti-VEGF therapy, these findings do not support using changes in CST as a surrogate for changes in visual acuity outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00417-022-05697-4.

Scleral Cross-Linking in Form-Deprivation Myopic Guinea Pig Eyes Leads to Glaucomatous Changes

Purpose

To investigate the potential glaucomatous changes caused by scleral cross-linking (CXL) in a guinea pig form-deprivation (FD) myopia model.

Methods

Eighty 4-week-old tricolor guinea pigs were divided into four groups: FD only, genipin CXL only, FD plus CXL, and control. Refractive error, axial length (AL), intraocular pressure (IOP), and structural and vasculature optic disc changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) were measured at baseline and day 21. CXL efficacy was evaluated by scleral rigidity Young's modulus values. Histological and molecular changes in the anterior chamber angle, retina, and sclera were assessed.

Results

Baseline parameters were similar among groups (P > 0.05). The FD plus CXL group at day 21 had the least increase of AL (0.14 ± 0.08 mm) and highest IOP elevation (31.5 ± 3.6 mmHg) compared with the FD-only group (AL: 0.68 ± 0.17 mm; IOP: 22.2 ± 2.6 mmHg) and the control group (AL: 0.24 ± 0.09 mm; IOP: 17.4 ± 1.8 mmHg) (all P < 0.001). OCT and OCTA parameters of the optic disc in the FD plus CXL group at day 21 showed glaucomatous changes and decreased blood flow signals. Sclera rigidity increased in the CXL and FD plus CXL groups. Advanced glycation end products deposited extensively in the retina, choroid, and sclera of FD plus CXL eyes.

Conclusions

CXL causes increased IOP and subsequent optic disc, anterior segment, and scleral changes while inhibiting myopic progression and axial elongation in FD guinea pig eyes. Therefore, applying CXL to control myopia raises safety concerns.

Detecting Anomalies in Retinal Diseases Using Generative, Discriminative, and Self-supervised Deep Learning

IMPORTANCE

Anomaly detectors could be pursued for retinal diagnoses based on artificial intelligence systems that may not have access to training examples for all retinal diseases in all phenotypic presentations. Possible applications could include screening of population for any retinal disease rather than a specific disease such as diabetic retinopathy, detection of novel retinal diseases or novel presentations of common retinal diseases, and detection of rare diseases with little or no data available for training.

OBJECTIVE

To study the application of anomaly detection to retinal diseases.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

High-resolution retinal images from the publicly available EyePACS data set with fundus images with a corresponding label ranging from 0 to 4 for representing different severities of diabetic retinopathy. Sixteen variants of anomaly detectors were designed. For evaluation, a surrogate problem was constructed, using diabetic retinopathy images, in which only retinas with nonreferable diabetic retinopathy, ie, no diabetic macular edema, and no diabetic retinopathy or mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy were used for training an artificial intelligence system, but both nonreferable and referable diabetic retinopathy (including diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy) were used to test the system for detecting retinal disease.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Anomaly detectors were evaluated by commonly accepted performance metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, F1 score, and accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 88 692 high-resolution retinal images of 44 346 individuals with varying severity of diabetic retinopathy were analyzed. The best performing across all anomaly detectors had an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.808 (95% CI, 0.789-0.827) and was obtained using an embedding method that involved a self-supervised network.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests when abnormal (diseased) data, ie, referable diabetic retinopathy in this study, were not available for training of retinal diagnostic systems wherein only nonreferable diabetic retinopathy was used for training, anomaly detection techniques were useful in identifying images with and without referable diabetic retinopathy. This suggests that anomaly detectors may be used to detect retinal diseases in more generalized settings and potentially could play a role in screening of populations for retinal diseases or identifying novel diseases and phenotyping or detecting unusual presentations of common retinal diseases.

Prevention of vision-threatening complications in diabetic retinopathy: two perspectives based on results from the DRCR Retina Network Protocol W and the Regeneron-sponsored PANORAMA

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of intravitreous antivascular endothelial growth factor to prevent center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with vision loss and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) has been investigated and recently reported in two randomized clinical trials. Although both trials showed substantial superiority of aflibercept at preventing the development of vision-threatening complications (VTCs) of CI-DME or PDR compared with sham at 1 or 2 years, without a concomitant benefit in visual acuity outcomes, the interpretation of the results and its application to clinical practice resulted in two disparate opinions. In this review, we discuss these two trials including their similarities and differences, other relevant studies, and considerations regarding the interpretation and the application of these results into clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Retina Network Protocol W and the PANORAMA study demonstrated significantly lower probabilities of developing CI-DME or PDR at 2 years with intravitreous aflibercept compared with sham in eyes with moderate (Protocol W) or moderately severe (PANORAMA) to severe non-PDR (NPDR). However, visual acuity outcomes were not different.

SUMMARY

Although intravitreous aflibercept injections reduce the risk of VTCs in eyes with moderate-to-severe NPDR, the absence of visual acuity benefits supports the need for four-year results.

Costs of Managing Diabetic Macular Edema With Good Visual Acuity With Aflibercept, Laser, or Observation: DRCR Retina Network Protocol V

PURPOSE

Because eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) and good baseline visual acuity (VA) showed no difference in VA loss when managed initially with observation, laser, or aflibercept, understanding the estimated costs of these strategies to the US population is relevant for health care planning.

DESIGN

Preplanned cost analysis from a randomized controlled trial (DRCR Retina Network Protocol V).

METHODS

Total costs for managing participants with CI-DME and good baseline VA assigned to aflibercept (n = 226), laser (n = 240), or observation (n = 236) during the 2-year multicenter trial were calculated. Observation or laser groups initiated aflibercept if VA decreased. The aflibercept group received injections up to every 4 weeks. Using epidemiological data and extrapolating costs, 10-year costs of care for all persons with CI-DME and good baseline VA throughout the United States were caluclated.

RESULTS

Assuming that all patients in the United States with CI-DME and good baseline VA received aflibercept initially, 10-year costs were projected to be $28.80 billion compared with $14.42 billion if initially receiving laser treatment or $15.70 billion if initially observed, with aflibercept added if VA worsened in the laser or observation arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar VA outcomes on average are obtained by initially managing CI-DME and good baseline VA with laser or observation strategies instead of immediately using aflibercept. Although any 1 of these 3 strategies might be warranted depending on an individual's specific circumstances, on a societal level, cost savings might be achieved with these first 2 approaches.

Patient Use of Dietary Supplements, Home Monitoring, or Genetic Testing for Nonneovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose:

This work evaluated the use and type of dietary supplements and home monitoring for nonneovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), as well as the prevalence of genetic testing among patients with AMD.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted of 129 participants older than 50 years who completed self-administered questionnaires regarding usage and type of dietary supplements and home monitoring, as well as the participants’ use of genetic testing for AMD.

Results:

Of 91 participants with AMD, 83 (91.2%) took vitamins, including 55 (60.4%) who used an Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) or AREDS2 formulation. Of 38 without AMD, 31 (81.6%) took vitamins (difference from participants with AMD = 9.6% [95% CI, 0%-23.2%]), including 2 on an AREDS formulation. Among 82 participants with AMD who were AREDS candidates (intermediate or advanced AMD in 1 or both eyes), 51 (62.2%; 95% CI, 51.7%-72.7%) took an AREDS or AREDS2 formulation, and 31 (37.8%) did not (5 were unsure). Additionally, 50 (61.0%; 95% CI, 50.4%-71.6%) AREDS candidates did some type of home monitoring. Only 1 (1.2%; 95% CI, 0%-3.6%) underwent genetic testing for AMD. Among 9 with AMD who were not AREDS candidates, 4 (44.4%) used an AREDS formulation, 4 (44.4%) did not, and 1 (11.1%) was unsure; only 1 (11.1%) of these 9 performed home monitoring.

Conclusions:

Despite similar results from past surveys and AREDS2 data supporting supplement use in 2013 and home monitoring in 2014, these findings suggest about one-third of AREDS candidates do not do so, providing further support for improving education regarding appropriate supplement and home monitoring usage. Genetic testing for AMD also appears infrequent.