Impact of an Expanded Definition of Family History on Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Despite family history being an established risk factor for prostate cancer, the role of a broader definition of family history inclusive of not just prostate cancer but other genetically related malignancies has not been investigated in the active surveillance population. Here, we evaluate the impact of an expanded definition of family history on active surveillance outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital from 1997-2019 with detailed data available on family cancer history were identified. Primary outcome was biopsy progression-free survival, and secondary outcomes were treatment-free survival, adverse pathological features at prostatectomy, and biochemical recurrence after treatment. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Among 855 evaluable patients, 300 (35.1%) patients had any family history of prostate cancer, and 95 (11.1%) had a family history of related malignancies suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome (family history of hereditary cancer syndrome). Family history of prostate cancer alone was not associated with biopsy progression, whereas family history of hereditary cancer syndrome was associated with a significantly increased risk of biopsy progression (HR 1.43, 95%CI 1.01-2.02), independent of other known clinicopathological risk factors in multivariable analysis. Similarly, family history of hereditary cancer syndrome was associated with significantly lower treatment-free survival (HR 1.58, 95%CI 1.14-2.18) in multivariable analysis. No significant association was found between family history and adverse features on surgical pathology or biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

An expanded family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome is an independent predictor of biopsy progression during active surveillance. Men with such a family history may still be offered active surveillance but should be counseled regarding the higher risk of disease progression.

Pretest Genetic Education Video Versus Genetic Counseling for Men Considering Prostate Cancer Germline Testing: A Patient-Choice Study to Address Urgent Practice Needs

PURPOSE

Germline testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCA) is now central to treatment and hereditary cancer assessment. With rising demand for and shortage of genetic counseling (GC), tools to deliver pretest informed consent across practice settings are needed to improve access to GT and precision care. Here, we report on Evaluation and Management for Prostate Oncology, Wellness, and Risk (EMPOWER), a patient-choice study for pretest video-based genetic education (VBGE) versus GC to inform urgent practice needs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men with PCA or at risk for PCA (family history of PCA) were eligible and could choose pretest VBGE or GC. Outcomes included decisional conflict for GT, change in genetics knowledge, satisfaction, and intention to share results with family and/or providers. Descriptive statistics summarized results with counts and percentages for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Data were compared with Fisher's exact, chi-squared, or Wilcoxon two-sample tests. Mean change in genetics knowledge was compared with t tests. The significance level was set a priori at .05.

RESULTS

Data on the first 127 participants were analyzed. Characteristics were White (85.8%), bachelor's degree (66.9%), and PCA diagnosis (90.6%). The majority chose VBGE (71%) versus GC (29%; P < .001). No differences were observed in decisional conflict for GT or satisfaction. Cancer genetics knowledge improved in both groups without significant difference (+0.9 VBGE, +1.8 GC, P = .056). Men who chose VBGE had higher intention to share GT results (96.4% VBGE v 86.4% GC, P = .02). Both groups had high rates of GT uptake (VBGE 94.4%, GC 92%).

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of men opted for pretest VBGE, with comparable patient-reported outcomes and uptake of GT. The results support the use of pretest video to address the critical GC shortage in the precision era.

The impact of a positive family history on clinical and pathologic outcomes of active surveillance for prostate cancer

225

Background: Active surveillance (AS) is the preferred management strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer. However, approximately one in three men on AS experience progression of disease leading to treatment within 5 years, highlighting an urgent unmet need to reliably distinguish indolent from aggressive prostate cancer and improve patient selection criteria for AS. Germline genetic testing for DNA repair gene mutations is now recommended for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and a strong family history of prostate cancer or BRCA1/2-related cancers, as such mutations have been associated with more aggressive forms of the disease. Here, we investigated the impact of family history on AS outcomes, under the hypothesis that men at high genetic risk for prostate cancer are at greater risk for progression to treatment on AS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed detailed family history data of 958 patients from our institutional database of men enrolled in AS between 1997-2019. Data on family history of prostate cancer and hereditary cancer syndrome ( BRCA1/2-related prostate, breast, ovarian and/or pancreatic cancers) were collected and integrated into a composite family history score incorporating the number of relatives with each cancer weighted by degree of relatedness. A strong family history was defined as a composite score representing > 1 first-degree relative equivalent. The primary outcome was biopsy progression and secondary outcomes were adverse pathologic features at prostatectomy and biochemical recurrence. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: In univariate analysis, a strong family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome (HR 1.37 [1.03-1.90], P = 0.033) was associated with a significant increased risk of biopsy progression; however, any family history of prostate cancer (HR 1.10 [0.89-1.35], P = 0.38) and a strong family history of prostate cancer (HR 1.35 [0.92-1.98], P = 0.13) were not significant. In multivariate analysis, a strong family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome remained a statistically significant predictor of biopsy progression (HR 1.42 [1.03-1.96], P = 0.03), after adjusting for age, percent core involvement on initial biopsy and PSA density. No significant association was found between family history and adverse features on surgical pathology or biochemical recurrence. Conclusions: A positive family history suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome is associated with an increased risk of biopsy progression on AS and is an independent predictor of biopsy progression. Men with such a family history may still be safely offered AS but should be counseled about the higher risk of progression. Further work to investigate the underlying genetic factors responsible for this increased risk is warranted.

Video vs. in-person genetic counseling for men considering germline prostate cancer testing: A patient-choice study

1577

Background: Germline testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCA) is rapidly increasing with higher demand for genetic counseling (GC). Alternate GC strategies need to be studied to address pretest informed consent. Here we conducted a patient-choice study of pretest video-based genetic education (VBGE) or in-person GC (IPGC) and assessed men’s preference and patient-reported outcomes from the first cohort of the Evaluation and Management for Prostate Oncology, Wellness, and Risk (EMPOWER) study. Methods: Eligibility for EMPOWER includes any male with PCA or at-risk for PCA based on family history or African American race. Men may choose pretest IPGC or VBGE. All receive results by a genetic professional. Demographics and PCA features were collected at baseline. The following outcomes and scales were assessed: baseline anxiety (GAD-7 scale), change in cancer genetics knowledge from baseline (Giri 2019), decisional conflict for GT (O’Connor 1993), and satisfaction (DeMarco 2004). Understanding of personal GT results was assessed after disclosure (Giri 2019). Descriptive statistics summarized results with counts and percentages for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Data were compared with Fisher’s exact, Chi-squared, or Wilcoxon two-sample tests, as appropriate. Mean change in cancer genetics knowledge was compared with t-tests. Significance level was set a priori at 0.05. All analyses were performed with SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC). Results: At the time of this analysis, 94 men were enrolled. Characteristics of the cohort were: White (88.3%), bachelor’s degree (67%), PCA diagnosis (93%), mean age of consent 59 years (IPGC) and 61 years (VBGE), Gleason > = 8 (32%), and > = T3 (31%). The majority preferred VBGE (77%) vs. IPGC (23%). Men who opted for IPGC had lower educational levels ( < = high school/GED) (18% IPGC vs 7% VBGE) and reported higher baseline anxiety (45% IPGC vs. 24% VBGE). Cancer genetics knowledge improved significantly with IPGC vs. VBGE (+2.5 vs +0.8; p < 0.01). No differences were observed in decisional conflict, satisfaction, or understanding of personal GT results between IPGC vs. VBGE. Both groups had high rates of GT uptake (IPGC 91%, VBGE 93%). Pathogenic mutations were identified in 15% in IPGC group and 10.4% in VBGE group. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of men opted for VBGE, and results suggest that VBGE is comparable to IPGC for men considering PCA GT. IPGC may be more suitable for men with lower knowledge of cancer genetics and greater levels or anxiety. Further study is warranted.

Methods for extracellular vesicle isolation from cancer cells

Cells are known to release different types of vesicles such as small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) and large extracellular vesicles (LEVs). sEVs and LEVs play important roles in intercellular communication, pre-metastatic niche formation, and disease progression; both can be detected cell culture media and biological fluids. sEVs and LEVs contain a variety of protein and RNA cargo, and they are believed to impact many biological functions of the recipient cells upon their internalization or binding to cell surface proteins. It has recently been established that standard isolation techniques, such as differential ultracentrifugation, yield a mixed population of EVs. However, density gradient ultracentrifugation has been reported to allow the isolation of sEVs without cellular debris. Here, we describe the most common methods used to isolate sEVs from cell culture medium, mouse and human plasma, and a new technique for isolating sEVs from tissues as well. This article also provides detailed procedures to isolate LEVs.

Exosomal αvβ6 integrin is required for monocyte M2 polarization in prostate cancer

Therapeutic approaches aimed at curing prostate cancer are only partially successful given the occurrence of highly metastatic resistant phenotypes that frequently develop in response to therapies. Recently, we have described αvβ6, a surface receptor of the integrin family as a novel therapeutic target for prostate cancer; this epithelial-specific molecule is an ideal target since, unlike other integrins, it is found in different types of cancer but not in normal tissues. We describe a novel αvβ6-mediated signaling pathway that has profound effects on the microenvironment. We show that αvβ6 is transferred from cancer cells to monocytes, including β6-null monocytes, by exosomes and that monocytes from prostate cancer patients, but not from healthy volunteers, express αvβ6. Cancer cell exosomes, purified via density gradients, promote M2 polarization, whereas αvβ6 down-regulation in exosomes inhibits M2 polarization in recipient monocytes. Also, as evaluated by our proteomic analysis, αvβ6 down-regulation causes a significant increase in donor cancer cells, and their exosomes, of two molecules that have a tumor suppressive role, STAT1 and MX1/2. Finally, using the Pten^pc-/- prostate cancer mouse model, which carries a prostate epithelial-specific Pten deletion, we demonstrate that αvβ6 inhibition in vivo causes up-regulation of STAT1 in cancer cells. Our results provide evidence of a novel mechanism that regulates M2 polarization and prostate cancer progression through transfer of αvβ6 from cancer cells to monocytes through exosomes.

The association between imported factors and prisoners' mental health: Implications for adaptation and intervention

In the United Kingdom (UK) the prison population has increased by around one third since the turn of the millennium amid growing concern over the correctional mission of prisons, the number of prisoners exhibiting mental health difficulties and high levels of recidivism. This study aims to explore the relationship between 'imported' (pre-prison) factors and prisoner mental health status. Prisoners (N = 756) from two UK prisons completed an established measure of mental health (General Health Questionnaire: GHQ-12) and a bespoke survey on pre-prison characteristics and experiences (for example, dispositions, childhood abuse, substance misuse, learning difficulties and employment). Prevalence of mental health difficulties was high, with 40.3% reaching the 'caseness' threshold. Binary logistic regression and odds ratio analyses were used to explore the ability of imported factors to predict mental health 'caseness' and the direction of influence. Collectively, the imported factors correctly predicted the caseness category of 76.5% of participants (p < .001). Pre-prison dispositions proved to be strong predictors of caseness as did childhood sexual abuse and learning difficulties at school. We found the direction of influence of three imported factors differed from all others: unemployment, prior experience of prison and a history of substance misuse. These three factors are associated with a lower rate of mental health caseness. It is of concern that, on release, these same factors are likely to militate against re-integration into society. Imported factors can serve as powerful predictors of 'within-prison' mental health status, but practitioners need to be cognisant of the relative importance and direction of influence of factors, as evidenced by these findings.

Reply to 'Civilizing the "Barbarian": a critical analysis of behaviour modification programmes in forensic psychiatry settings'

AIM

To consider ethical propositions relating to nursing in UK forensic settings.

BACKGROUND

A previous paper considered behavioural programmes with a Canadian forensic population.

METHOD

Some literature and personal reflections are presented.

RESULTS

Whilst some similarities with the nature of Canadian forensic settings are identified, the UK is developing its' own cognitive-behavioural tradition of working.

CONCLUSIONS

The skills necessary for working with forensic patients are a development of a wider mental health nursing and therapy skill-set.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

Nurse managers within forensic services need to be clear about the values of their services and ensure that therapeutic approaches are consistent with these values. Managers must consider how to support nurses acquire the requisite skill-set.

An audit of psychiatric case notes in relation to antipsychotic medication and information giving

This paper reports upon a Welsh Office funded "clinical effectiveness" project. The project aimed to produce evidence-based practice guidelines for depot neuroleptic medication. An audit was conducted to establish current practice regarding the provision of illness and treatment specific information to out-patients and their informal carers. Sixty-five patients' case-notes, under the care of a single community mental health team were examined for evidence of the type, nature and frequency of information given to patients receiving typical depot neuroleptic medications. Service guidelines were produced and are presented.