Distinction of ALK fusion gene- and EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer with tumor markers

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to predict gene mutations individually based on clinical background alone. Tumor markers may help to predict each gene mutation. Identifying tumor markers that can predict gene mutation will facilitate timely genetic testing and intervention.

METHODS

We selected 134 cases of advanced or recurrent ALK-positive and 172 cases of advanced or recurrent EGFR-positive lung cancer from our clinical database. The cutoff values for the tumor markers were defined as 5.0 ng/mL or higher for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and 3.5 ng/mL or higher for soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA21-1) in accordance with the institutional standards. A positive CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio was defined as 0.7 or higher.

RESULTS

The CEA-positivity rate was 49% for ALK-positive lung cancers and 73% for EGFR-positive lung cancers, which was significantly different (p < 0.001). The CYFRA21-1 positivity rate was significantly higher in ALK-positive lung cancer (36%) compared with EGFR-positive lung cancer (23%) (p = 0.034). The median CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio was 0.395 for the ALK group, which was significantly higher compared with 0.098 for the EGFR group (p < 0.001). These trends were similar when excluding histology other than adenocarcinoma. The median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) for initial tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was 308 days for the high CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio group and 617 days for the low CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio group for ALK-positive lung cancer (p = 0.100).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher proportion of patients with ALK-positive lung cancer were CYFRA21-1 positive and had higher CYFRA21-1:CEA ratios compared with EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.

KEYNOTE-434 part B: A phase 1 study evaluating the combination of epacadostat, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy in Japanese patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 inhibitor) was well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors in part A of the nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1 KEYNOTE-434 study (NCT02862457). We report results from part B, which evaluated epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients aged ≥ 20 years had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with no prior systemic therapy, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received epacadostat 100 mg orally twice-daily, pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every-3-weeks for ≤ 35 cycles, and 4 cycles of chemotherapy (cohort 1: cisplatin plus pemetrexed, non-squamous; cohort 2: carboplatin plus pemetrexed, non-squamous; cohort 3: carboplatin plus paclitaxel, squamous or non-squamous). Primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Following unfavorable results from other studies, a protocol amendment removed epacadostat from the treatment combination.

RESULTS

Of 19 patients, 7 were enrolled in cohort 1, and 6 each in cohorts 2 and 3. Median follow-up was 13.7 (range, 4.2-27.8) months. Five of 17 (29%) DLT-evaluable patients experienced ≥ 1 DLT (cohort 1, n = 1; cohorts 2 and 3, n = 2 each); most commonly maculopapular rash (grade 3, n = 3) and increased alanine aminotransferase (grade 2, n = 1; grade 3, n = 2). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs); 58% experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs. Objective response rate was 47%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was found to be tolerable in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02862457.

Atezolizumab and Platinum Plus Pemetrexed With or Without Bevacizumab for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The combination of an antibody to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or to its ligand (PD-L1) with chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy not only of chemotherapy but also of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies through blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression, but further data are needed to support this.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab administered with platinum combination therapy and atezolizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

An open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 37 hospitals in Japan. Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without genetic driver alterations or those with genetic driver alterations who had received treatment with at least 1 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor were enrolled between January 20, 2019, and August 12, 2020.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atezolizumab plus carboplatin with pemetrexed (APP) or atezolizumab, carboplatin plus pemetrexed, and bevacizumab (APPB). After 4 cycles of induction therapy, maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or with atezolizumab, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab was administered until evidence of disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or the elapse of 2 years from the initiation of protocol treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.

Results

A total of 412 patients were enrolled (273 men [66%]; median age, 67.0 [range, 24-89] years) and randomly assigned, with 205 in the APPB group and 206 in the APP group of the ITT population after exclusion of 1 patient for good clinical practice violation. The median BICR-assessed PFS was 9.6 months with APPB vs 7.7 months with APP (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07; 1-sided stratified log-rank test; P = .92). According to prespecified subgroup analysis of BICR-assessed PFS, an improved PFS with APPB vs APP was apparent specifically in driver oncogene-positive patients (median, 9.7 vs 5.8 months; stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98). Toxic effects related to bevacizumab were increased in the APPB group.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this trial did not show superiority of APPB over APP for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC; however, this regimen showed a similar tolerability and improved survival relative to APP in patients with driver oncogenes.

Trial Registration

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080224500.

Prophylactic pegfilgrastim reduces febrile neutropenia in ramucirumab plus docetaxel after chemoimmunotherapy in advanced NSCLC: post hoc analysis from NEJ051

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on FN prevention, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis after RD have not been fully evaluated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received RD as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade were included. Patients were divided into groups with and without prophylactic pegfilgrastim, and adverse events, efficacy, and prognosis were compared between both groups. Of the 288 patients, 247 received prophylactic pegfilgrastim and 41 did not. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 62 patients (25.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 28 (68.3%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The frequency of FN was 25 patients (10.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 10 (24.4%) in the control group (p = 0.018). The objective response rate was 31.2% and 14.6% in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.039), respectively. The disease control rate was 72.9% in the pegfilgrastim group and 51.2% in the control group (p = 0.009). Median progression free survival was 4.3 months in the pegfilgrastim group and 2.5 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The median overall survival was 12.8 and 8.1 months in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.004), respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim for RD reduced the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and did not appear to be detrimental to patient outcome RD.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333.

Efficacy of osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

As an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), osimertinib has emerged as a standard EGFR-mutation positive treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of osimertinib for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of osimertinib on time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, comparing those with and without MPE.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with osimertinib at our hospital between April 2016 and June 2021. TTF was defined as the duration from osimertinib initiation to discontinuation, and OS as the duration until death, irrespective of the reason.

RESULTS

Among 229 patients receiving osimertinib, 84 had MPE before administration, 39 acquired EGFR exon20 T790M mutation following previous EGFR-TKI therapy, and 45 were EGFR-TKI-naive. Among EGFR-TKI-naive patients, median TTF was 14.8 and 19.8 months for those with and without MPE, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-2.18; p = 0.12). Median OS was 32.0 and 42.0 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.43; 95% CI: 0.86-2.38; p = 0.16). Among patients with T790M mutation, median TTF was 12.3 and 13.1 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.55; p = 0.88). Median OS for patients with and without MPE was 23.2 and 24.7 months, respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.72-1.67; p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, the evidence of MPE has little effect on survival with osimertinib.

NOTCH1 and CREBBP co-mutations negatively affect the benefit of adjuvant therapy in completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC: translational research of phase III IMPACT study

The phase III IMPACT study (UMIN000044738) compared adjuvant gefitinib with cisplatin plus vinorelbine (cis/vin) in completely resected epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was not met, we searched for molecular predictors of adjuvant gefitinib efficacy. Of 234 patients enrolled in the IMPACT study, 202 patients were analyzed for 409 cancer-related gene mutations and tumor mutation burden using resected lung cancer specimens. Frequent somatic mutations included tumor protein p53 (TP53; 58.4%), CUB and Sushi multiple domains 3 (CSMD3; 11.8%), and NOTCH1 (9.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that NOTCH1 co-mutation was a significant poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in the gefitinib group and cAMP response element binding protein (CREBBP) co-mutation for DFS and OS in the cis/vin group. In patients with NOTCH1 co-mutations, gefitinib group had a shorter OS than cis/vin group (Hazard ratio 5.49, 95% CI 1.07-28.00), with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.039). In patients with CREBBP co-mutations, the gefitinib group had a longer DFS than the cis/vin group, with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.058). In completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, NOTCH1 and CREBBP mutations might predict poor outcome in patients treated with gefitinib and cis/vin, respectively.

Osimertinib with or without Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. Evidence suggests that the addition of chemotherapy may extend the benefits of EGFR-TKI therapy.

METHODS

In this phase 3, international, open-label trial, we randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received treatment for advanced disease to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) with chemotherapy (pemetrexed [500 mg per square meter of body-surface area] plus either cisplatin [75 mg per square meter] or carboplatin [pharmacologically guided dose]) or to receive osimertinib monotherapy (80 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Response and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 557 patients underwent randomization. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group than in the osimertinib group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.79; P<0.001). At 24 months, 57% (95% CI, 50 to 63) of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and 41% (95% CI, 35 to 47) of those in the osimertinib group were alive and progression-free. Progression-free survival as assessed according to blinded independent central review was consistent with the primary analysis (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.80). An objective (complete or partial) response was observed in 83% of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and in 76% of those in the osimertinib group; the median response duration was 24.0 months (95% CI, 20.9 to 27.8) and 15.3 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.4), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events from any cause was higher with the combination than with monotherapy - a finding driven by known chemotherapy-related adverse events. The safety profile of osimertinib plus pemetrexed and a platinum-based agent was consistent with the established profiles of the individual agents.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line treatment with osimertinib-chemotherapy led to significantly longer progression-free survival than osimertinib monotherapy among patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04035486.).

Clinical characteristics of patients with KRAS mutation detected by liquid biopsy

BACKGROUND

KRAS mutation positive lung cancer is known to be clinically characterized by older age, males, and smokers. It is reported to be more common in mucinous adenocarcinoma, but all reports are based on analysis of tissue samples. Recently, blood samples have become available for analysis, suggesting a low detection rate of circulating tumor DNA in histological types, especially mucinous adenocarcinoma. In this study, we investigated the clinical characteristics of KRAS mutation-positive cases in the analysis of blood specimens, as these remain unclear.

METHODS

The clinical background of patients with KRAS mutation among those who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis using blood samples was evaluated.

RESULTS

NGS analysis was performed on 214 blood samples. KRAS mutations were detected in blood samples in 33 cases (15.4%), of which 31 cases (14.5%) had a histological pathology diagnosis. Mucinous adenocarcinoma accounted for 28.6% of cases with positive blood and tissue specimens, 10.0% of cases with positive blood specimens only, and 57.1% of cases with positive tissue specimens only. Mucinous adenocarcinoma tended to be less common in cases with positive blood specimens. In KRAS-positive patients with lung metastasis only, only one nonmucinous adenocarcinoma had a positive blood sample, and the others all had mucinous adenocarcinomas with positive tissue samples only.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the detection rate of KRAS-positive lung cancers detected by blood and tissue samples differs, and that the detection rate of blood samples may be poor, especially in the case of mucinous adenocarcinoma with lung metastases only.

Subsequent treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that progressed after definitive chemoradiotherapy and consolidation therapy with durvalumab: a multicenter retrospective analysis (TOPGAN 2021-02)

PURPOSE

For patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) that progressed after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and durvalumab consolidation therapy, no subsequent standard treatment exists. The type of treatment selected for each timing of disease progression and its efficacy have not been investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with LA-NSCLC or inoperable NSCLC that progressed after definitive CRT and durvalumab consolidation therapy at 15 Japanese institutions. Patients were classified into the following: Early Discontinuation group (disease progression within 6 months after durvalumab initiation), Late Discontinuation group (disease progression from 7 to 12 months after durvalumab initiation), and Accomplishment group (disease progression from 12 months after durvalumab initiation).

RESULTS

Altogether, 127 patients were analyzed, including 50 (39.4%), 42 (33.1%) and 35 (27.5%) patients from the Early Discontinuation, Late Discontinuation, and Accomplishment groups, respectively. Subsequent treatments were Platinum plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in 18 (14.2%), ICI in 7 (5.5%), Platinum in 59 (46.4%), Non-Platinum in 35 (27.6%), and tyrosine kinase inhibitor in 8 (6.3%) patients. In the Early Discontinuation, Late Discontinuation, and Accomplishment groups, 4 (8.0%), 7 (16.7%), and 7 (20.0%) patients were receiving Platinum plus ICI; 21 (42.0%), 22 (52.4%), and 16 (45.7%) were receiving Platinum, and 20 (40.0%), 8 (19.0%), and 7 (20.0%) were receiving Non-Platinum, respectively. No significant difference in progression-free survival was observed in the timing of disease progression.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LA-NSCLC hat progressed after definitive CRT and durvalumab consolidation therapy, subsequent treatment may change depending on the timing of disease progression.

Real-World Outcome Analysis of Patients With Stage IV NSCLC Treated With Tyrosine Kinase and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Introduction

Only a few reports have determined whether recently advanced anticancer drugs, particularly next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), prolong the survival of patients with NSCLC in the real world.

Methods

To evaluate the association between recently advanced drugs and patient survival, survival data of 2078 patients with stage IV NSCLC from 1995 to 2022 were analyzed in the present study. The patients were classified into the following six groups in terms of the date of diagnosis: period A, 1995 to 1999; period B, 2000 to 2004; period C, 2005 to 2009; period D, 2010 to 2014; period E, 2015 to 2019; and period F, 2000 to 2022. They were further grouped in terms of EGFR mutation and ALK fusion.

Results

The median overall survival (mOS) times were 8.9, 11.0, 13.6, 17.9, and 25.2 months in periods A to E, respectively, and the mOS time was not reached in period F. This time was significantly longer in period E than in period D (25.2 versus 17.9 mo, p < 0.005). Moreover, the mOS times of patients with EGFR mutation, those with ALK fusion, and those without both alterations were significantly longer in period E than in period D (46.0 versus 32.0 mo, p < 0.005; not reached versus 36.2 mo, p = 0.018; 14.6 versus 11.7 mo, p < 0.005). The history of treatment with next-generation TKIs and ICIs was found to be associated with overall survival.

Conclusions

The survival of patients with NSCLC was improved from period D to period E, regardless of the presence of driver gene alteration. We found that next-generation TKIs and ICIs may be associated with improvements in overall survival.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor as a predictive biomarker for poor efficacy of combination treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) suppresses effector T-cells. Few studies have assessed serum sIL-2R in patients receiving immunotherapy. We evaluated the association between serum sIL-2R levels and the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibody combined with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We prospectively enrolled NSCLC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with platinum-based chemotherapy between 8/2019 and 8/2020 and measured their serum sIL-2R. The patients were divided into high and low sIL-2R groups based on the median of sIL-2R levels at pretreatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the high and low sIL-2R groups were compared. The Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS were evaluated using the log-rank test. The multivariate analysis of PFS and OS was performed using the Cox proportional hazard models. Among 54 patients (median age 65, range 34-84), 39 were male and 43 had non-squamous cell carcinoma. The sIL-2R cut-off value was 533 U/mL. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-7.5 months) and 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-not reached [NR] months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.007), respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.0-NR months) and NR (95% CI, 10.3-NR months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.005), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high sIL-2R was significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS. SIL-2R may be a biomarker for the poor efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with chemotherapy.

Advances in the treatment of postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer and their impact on survival in Asian patients

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy on survival after postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or more with complete pathological resection between 2008 and 2018 (N = 2254). Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Survival trends and the effect of TKIs/immunotherapy were analyzed using Joinpoint (National Cancer Institute) and Cox regression.

RESULTS

In 443 (19.7%) postoperative recurrences, median time to recurrence was 1.1 years; epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFR+), 191 (43.1%); anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement (ALK+), 13 (2.9%); not detected or unknown (ND), 239 (54.0%). In multivariable analysis, age, time to recurrence, adenocarcinoma, symptomatic recurrence, any treatment for recurrence, use of the epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, use of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase TKI, and use of immunotherapy were significant prognostic factors. Survival was significantly better in the EGFR+/ALK+ group than in the ND group (median, 4.7 vs 2.1 years; P < .01). Between 2010 and 2018, 2-year postrecurrence survival improved significantly (annual percentage change [APC], 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0). In subset analyses, neither change in 2-year survival nor TKI use was significant over time in the EGFR+/ALK+ group, but the ND group experienced significant improvement in 2-year survival (APC, 13.5; 95% CI, 5.4-22.2) and increasing trend in immunotherapy use (APC, 23.0; 95% CI, -5.9 to 60) after 2013.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after postoperative recurrence of NSCLC has improved significantly since 2010. Use of immunotherapy in patients without driver mutations may have contributed to that improvement. Prognosis in patients with driver mutations remains favorable with the TKIs introduced before the study period.

Multicentre real-world data of ramucirumab plus docetaxel after combined platinum-based chemotherapy with programmed death-1 blockade in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NEJ051 (REACTIVE study)

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) is a promising treatment for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its clinical significance after platinum-based chemotherapy plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade remains unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the clinical significance of RD as a second-line treatment after the failure of chemo-immunotherapy in NSCLC?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective study, 288 patients with advanced NSCLC who received RDas second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade, at 62 Japanese institutions from January 2017 to August 2020, were included. Prognostic analyses were performed using the log-rank test. Prognostic factor analyses were performed using a Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 288 patients were enrolled: 222 were men (77.1%), 262 were aged <75 years (91.0%), 237 (82.3%) had smoking history and 269 (93.4%) had a performance status (PS) of 0-1. One hundred ninety-nine patients (69.1%) were classified as adenocarcinoma (AC) and 89 (30.9%) as non-AC. The types of PD-1 blockade used in the first-line treatment were anti-PD-1 antibody and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody in 236 (81.9%) and 52 (18.1%) patients, respectively. The objective response rate for RD was 28.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7-34.4). The disease control rate was 69.8% (95% CI, 64.1-75.0).The median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-4.6) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.9), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, non-AC and PS 2-3 were independent prognostic factors for worse progression free survival , while bone metastasis on diagnosis, PS 2-3 and non-AC were identified as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival.

INTERPRETATION

RD is a feasible second-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC who had received combined chemo-immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000042333.

Effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab monotherapy in previously treated Japanese patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter, prospective, observational study (J-TAIL)

Introduction

The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in previously treated patients with NSCLC have been established in the registrational phase 3 OAK trial. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab monotherapy in a large real-world cohort to confirm the reproducibility of the results of the registrational trial.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with previously treated NSCLC scheduled to receive atezolizumab monotherapy were enrolled. The primary end point was the 18-month overall survival (OS) rate. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs was evaluated.

Results

Overall, 1002 patients were included in the safety analysis set and 1000 in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. Of the full analysis set, 62% were ineligible for the OAK trial (OAK-unlike subpopulation). The 18-month OS rate was 41.1%, with a median OS of 13.0 months (95% confidence interval: 12.2-15.1). The 18-month OS rate was 49.4% and 36.1% in OAK-like and OAK-unlike subpopulations, respectively; that in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2 was 14.3%. The incidence of AEs overall, in the OAK-like, and OAK-unlike subpopulations was 43.9%, 46.2%, and 42.5%; that of immune-related AEs was 19.0%, 20.1%, and 18.3%, respectively.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that atezolizumab may be effective and safe for previously treated patients with NSCLC in real-world settings; however, atezolizumab administration should be considered carefully regarding the benefit-risk balance for the OAK-unlike subpopulation, especially in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2.

Clinical efficacy of amrubicin in patients with small cell lung cancer relapse after first-line treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective multicenter study (TOPGAN 2021-01)

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic efficacy of cytotoxic anticancer drugs has been reported to be enhanced after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in non-small cell lung cancer; however, it is unclear whether the same is applicable for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We evaluated the efficacy of second-line amrubicin (AMR) following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI combination therapy (chemo-ICI) in SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with SCLC treated with AMR as a second-line following chemo-ICI as first-line between July 2019 and April 2021 from 16 institutions throughout Japan. We investigated the therapeutic effectiveness, safety, and efficacy-enhancing variables of AMR.

RESULTS

Overall, 89 patients treated with AMR after first-line chemo-ICI were analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29.2% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 20.1-39.8) and median PFS (m PFS) was 2.99 months (95% CI, 2.27-3.65). Patients who relapsed more than 90 days after receiving first-line platinum combination therapy (sensitive relapse) exhibited greater ORR (58.3% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.035) and m PFS (5.03 vs. 2.56 months, p = 0.019) than patients who relapsed in <90 days (refractory relapse). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were mainly hematological toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that the therapeutic effect of AMR was not enhanced after ICI on SCLC. However, AMR may be effective in cases of sensitive relapse after chemo-ICI. There was no increase in severe toxicity associated with AMR after ICI.

EGFR-TKI re-administration after osimertinib failure in T790M mutation loss cases with re-biopsy

Data on the re-administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after osimertinib failure in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration efficacy may vary between patients with T790M loss and those with T790M persistent with re-biopsy after osimertinib treatment. Patients who received EGFR-TKI re-administration (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) after osimertinib failure were identified from our database. T790M mutation status before EGFR-TKI re-administration was analyzed via repeat biopsy. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of EGFR-TKI re-administration, especially differences according to the T790M mutation status, via repeat biopsy. Until June 2020, 28 patients received EGFR-TKI re-administration and 17 underwent repeat biopsy after osimertinib failure. Patients were divided into three groups, including the T790M loss group, where active mutation persisted and T790M was lost (13/17); T790M remaining group, where both the active mutation and T790M persisted (3/17); and active mutation loss group where both the active mutation and T790M were lost (1/17). The overall response rate (ORR) of EGFR-TKI re-administration in the T790M loss group was 31% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 54%, which were higher than the ORR of 21% and DCR of 43% in the entire patient population. ORR and DCR of the not re-biopsy group were low (9% and 27%, respectively). The therapeutic effect of EGFR-TKI re-administration in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC after osimertinib failure is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration may be considered in cases of T790M loss after repeat biopsy.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 overexpression mediates ALK inhibitor resistance in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

The rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) occurs in 3%‐5% of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confers sensitivity to ALK–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). For the treatment of patients with ALK‐rearranged NSCLC, various additional ALK‐TKIs have been developed. Ceritinib is a second‐generation ALK‐TKI and has shown great efficacy in the treatment of patients with both newly diagnosed and crizotinib (a first‐generation ALK‐TKI)‐refractory ALK‐rearranged NSCLC. However, tumors can also develop ceritinib resistance. This may result from secondary ALK mutations, but other mechanisms responsible for this have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we explored the mechanisms of ceritinib resistance by establishing ceritinib‐resistant, echinoderm microtubule‐associated protein‐like 4 (EML4)‐ALK–positive H3122 cells and ceritinib‐resistant patient‐derived cells. We identified a mechanism of ceritinib resistance induced by bypass signals that is mediated by the overexpression and activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). FGFR3 knockdown by small hairpin RNA or treatment with FGFR inhibitors was found to resensitize the resistant cells to ceritinib in vitro and in vivo. FGFR ligands from either human serum or fetal bovine serum were able to activate FGFR3 and induce ceritinib resistance. A detailed analysis of ceritinib‐resistant patient‐derived specimens confirmed that tyrosine‐protein kinase Met (cMET) amplification induces ceritinib resistance. Amplified cMET counteractivated EGFR and/or Her3 and induced ceritinib resistance. These results reveal multiple ceritinib resistance mechanisms and suggest that ceritinib resistance might be overcome by identifying precise resistance mechanisms.

Machine learning-based gene alteration prediction model for primary lung cancer using cytologic images

BACKGROUND

Understanding the gene alteration status of primary lung cancers is important for determining treatment strategies, but gene testing is both time-consuming and costly, limiting its application in clinical practice. Here, potential therapeutic targets were selected by predicting gene alterations in cytologic specimens before conventional gene testing.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study to develop a cytologic image-based gene alteration prediction model for primary lung cancer. Photomicroscopic images of cytology samples were collected and image patches were generated for analyses. Cancer-positive (n = 106) and cancer-negative (n = 32) samples were used to develop a neural network model for selecting cancer-positive images. Cancer-positive cases were randomly assigned to training (n = 77) and validation (n = 26) data sets. Another neural network model was developed to classify cancer images of the training data set into 4 groups: anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-fusion, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), or Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutated groups, and other (None group), and images of the validation data set were classified. A decision algorithm to predict gene alteration for cases with 3 probability ranks was developed.

RESULTS

The accuracy and precision for selecting cancer-positive patches were 0.945 and 0.991, respectively. Predictive accuracy for the EGFR and KRAS groups in the validation data set was ~0.95, whereas that for the ALK and None groups was ~0.75 and ~ 0.80, respectively. Gene status was correctly predicted in the probability rank A cases. The model extracted characteristic conventional cytologic findings in images and a novel specific feature was discovered for the EGFR group.

CONCLUSIONS

A gene alteration prediction model for lung cancers by machine learning based on cytologic images was successfully developed.

TRUST-II: A global phase II study for taletrectinib in ROS1 fusion–positive lung cancer and other solid tumors

TPS8601

Background: Taletrectinib (AB-106/DS-6051b) is a next-generation, brain-penetrant, ROS1/ NTRK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and has shown clinically meaningful effect and safety profile in ROS1+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients in phase 1 studies (Fujiwara et al, Oncotarget 2018; 9(34): 23729-23737; Ou et al, JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020 Oct 21;2(1):100108). Taletrectinib has also demonstrated activity against ROS1 G2032R resistance mutation and CNS metastases in the ongoing phase 2 TRUST study (NCT04395677) in China. Also, taletrectinib has shown preliminary efficacy against NTRK positive solid tumors in an ongoing phase 2 study (NCT04617054). Methods: TRUST-II study (NCT04919811) is a phase 2, global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm multi-cohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of taletrectinib for ROS1 fusion-positive advanced metastatic NSCLC and other solid tumors. Taletrectinib will be given at 600 mg once daily in 21-day cycle. The patients with ROS1 fusions detected by local tests are eligible to enroll with retrospective confirmation by a central laboratory. The study consists of four cohorts: cohort 1: systemic chemotherapy naïve or ≤ one prior line and ROS1 TKI naïve NSCLC (N = 53); cohort 2: previously treated with one ROS1 TKI (crizotinib or entrectinib) and with progression who are either chemotherapy naïve or ≤ one line of platinum and/or pemetrexed based therapy for NSCLC (N = 46); cohort 3: ≤ 2 prior ROS1 TKIs and with progression who are either chemotherapy naïve or ≤ 2 lines of platinum and/or pemetrexed based therapy for NSCLC (N = 10); and cohort 4: systemic chemotherapy naïve or ≤ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, but ROS1-TKI naïve ROS1 positive solid tumor other than NSCLC (N = 10). The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1) by independent review committee (IRC) assessment for cohorts 1 and 2. Key secondary endpoints include IRC-assessed duration of response, IRC-assessed intra-cranial ORR, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. This study is currently recruiting in Japan, Republic of Korea, and USA. Additional accrual is planned in Canada, China, and European Union. Clinical trial information: NCT04919811.

Clinical efficacy of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective analysis (TOPGAN2020-02)

Background

Dacomitinib is the second‐generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR‐TKIs are often re‐administered in Japan after the disease progression prior EGFR‐TKI. There is little evidence of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of dacomitinib in rechallenge setting.

Methods

Patients who received dacomitinib for advanced EGFR‐mutant NSCLC who had progressed after EGFR‐TKI in nine institutions in Japan were included in the analyses.

Results

In total, 43 patients were analyzed. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5–5.6). The overall survival (OS) was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.4–not reached). The overall response rate was 25.5% (95% CI, 13.1–33.7). Subset analysis indicated that patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R showed longer PFS than those with EGFR exon 19 deletion (5.8 vs. 4.1 months) (p = 0.018). The most common adverse events leading to dose modification were diarrhea, paronychia, rash, and oral mucositis.

Conclusion

In the real practice in Japan, dacomitinib showed a worthwhile treatment option for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation after failure of previous EGFR‐TKI. The benefit was especially pronounced in patients with the exon 21 mutation.

GSK3 inhibition circumvents and overcomes acquired lorlatinib resistance in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is found in ~3%–5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Although the third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lorlatinib shows high clinical efficacy in ALK-positive NSCLC, most of the patients eventually relapse with acquired resistance. Recently, drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells have been considered an important seed of acquired resistance cells. In this study, we established lorlatinib intermediate resistant cells from a patient-derived cell model. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) inhibitions significantly suppressed lorlatinib intermediate resistant cell growth. GSK3 inhibition also sensitized acquired resistance cells derived from alectinib-treated patients with or without secondary mutations to lorlatinib. Therefore, GSK3 plays a crucial role in developing acquired resistance against lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC mediated by lorlatinib intermediate resistant cells and could be a potential molecular target to prevent acquired lorlatinib resistance and overcome ALK-TKI resistance.

Trastuzumab emtansine for patients with non-small cell lung cancer positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 exon-20 insertion mutations

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutations are present in ∼3% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with exon-20 insertions accounting for ∼90% of such HER2 mutations and having been identified as driver oncogenic alterations. Antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugates including trastuzumab deruxtecan have shown an excellent efficacy for NSCLC with HER2 mutations. We have now performed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for NSCLC positive for HER2 exon-20 insertion mutations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with HER2 exon-20 insertion mutations confirmed by next-generation sequencing or multiplex polymerase chain reaction platforms and a history of one or two lines of chemotherapy received T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg) intravenously every 21 days. The primary end-point of the study was the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Between February 2019 and July 2020, 22 patients were enrolled in the study. A775_G776insYVMA was the most frequent HER2 exon-20 insertion mutation, accounting for 19 (86.4%) of the 22 patients. The ORR was 38.1% (90% confidence interval, 23.0-55.9%), and the disease control rate was 52.4%. The median duration of response was 3.5 months, and the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 2.8 and 8.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was mild, with the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥3 being low.

CONCLUSION

T-DM1 is a potential treatment option for patients with NSCLC with HER2 exon-20 insertion mutations. Further investigation of biomarkers for T-DM1 is warranted to improve its efficacy for NSCLC with such mutations.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

JapicCTI-194620.

Soluble PD-L1 through alternative polyadenylation works as a decoy in lung cancer immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint therapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a novel development in anticancer therapy and has been applied to clinical medicine. However, there are still some problems, including a relatively low response rate, innate mechanisms of resistance against immune checkpoint blockades, and the absence of reliable biomarkers to predict responsiveness. In this study of in vitro and in vivo models, we demonstrate that PD-L1-vInt4, a splicing variant of PD-L1, plays a role as a decoy in anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment. First, we showed that PD-L1-vInt4 was detectable in clinical samples and that it was possible to visualize the secreting variants with IHC. By overexpressing the PD-L1-secreted splicing variant on MC38 cells, we observed that an immune-suppressing effect was not induced by their secretion alone. We then demonstrated that PD-L1-vInt4 secretion resisted anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment, compared with wild type PD-L1, which was explicable by the PD-L1-vInt4's decoying of the anti-PD-L1 antibody. The decoying function of PD-L1 splicing variants may be one of the reasons for cancers being resistant to anti-PD-L1 therapy. Measuring serum PD-L1 levels might be helpful in deciding the therapeutic strategy.

Osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed in newly diagnosed epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: safety run-in results from the FLAURA2 study

Background

The phase III FLAURA2 (NCT04035486) study will evaluate efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib with platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy versus osimertinib monotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The safety run-in, reported here, assessed the safety and tolerability of osimertinib with chemotherapy prior to the randomized phase III evaluation.

Patients and methods

Patients (≥18 years; Japan: ≥20 years) with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC received oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD), with either intravenous (IV) cisplatin 75 mg/m² or IV carboplatin target area under the curve 5, plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 3 weeks (Q3W) for four cycles. Maintenance was osimertinib 80 mg QD with pemetrexed 500 mg/m² Q3W until progression/discontinuation. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of the osimertinib–chemotherapy combination.

Results

Thirty patients (15 per group) received treatment [Asian, 73%; female, 63%; median age (range) 61 (45-84) years]. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 27 patients (90%): osimertinib–carboplatin–pemetrexed, 100%; osimertinib–cisplatin–pemetrexed, 80%. Most common AEs were constipation (60%) with osimertinib–carboplatin–pemetrexed and nausea (60%) with osimertinib–cisplatin–pemetrexed. In both groups, 20% of patients reported serious AEs. No specific pattern of AEs leading to dose modifications/discontinuations was observed; one patient discontinued all study treatments including osimertinib due to pneumonitis (study-specific discontinuation criterion). Hematologic toxicities were as expected and manageable.

Conclusions

Osimertinib–chemotherapy combination had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in EGFRm advanced/metastatic NSCLC, supporting further assessment in the FLAURA2 randomized phase.

•

FLAURA2 aims to assess efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib with platinum–pemetrexed in EGFRm advanced NSCLC.

•

In the FLAURA2 safety run-in period, 30 patients received osimertinib and pemetrexed with carboplatin or cisplatin.

•

Most common AEs were constipation and nausea; no AE patterns leading to dose modifications/discontinuations were observed.

•

The FLAURA2 safety run-in study showed that the safety profile of this combination was as expected and manageable.

Association Between the Efficacy of Pembrolizumab and Low STK11/LKB1 Expression in High-PD-L1-expressing Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

STK11/LKB1 mutation has been suggested as a poorly responding candidate biomarker of the anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody; however, the association between STK11/LKB1 expression and the effects of anti-PD-1 antibodies is uncertain. The aim of the study was to correlate the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy and STK11/LKB1 expression in untreated patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and high PD-ligand 1 expression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2017 to January 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 30 previously untreated patients with NSCLC and a tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. STK11/LKB1 expression in tumor tissue was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (76.7%) of the 30 patients were classified with low-STK11/LKB1 expression. The median progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with low-STK11/LKB1 expression was shorter than those with high-STK11/LKB1 expression, although the results were not statistically significant. The disease progression rate for the low-STK11/LKB1 group was higher than that of the high-STK11/LKB1 group.

CONCLUSION

STK11/LKB1 expression, as measured by immunohistochemistry, could be a useful biomarker associated with the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy for patients with NSCLC and a TPS ≥50%.

Characteristics of central nervous system progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib or alectinib

Background

Most patients treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors for ALK‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop resistance, leading to metastasis, with progression to the central nervous system (CNS) being a primary concern. Although alectinib has better CNS penetration than crizotinib, patients treated with alectinib also develop CNS progression. CNS metastases more likely occurs during crizotinib treatment due to less blood‐brain barrier (BBB) penetration capability than alectinib. CNS progression pattern may be different during crizotinib and alecitinib treatment. Understanding the characteristics of CNS progression is important for developing treatment strategies.

Aims

We compared the clinical‐radiographic characteristics of CNS metastases among patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatment for ALK‐positive NSCLCs.

Methods and results

We retrospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical characteristics of CNS progression in ALK‐positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib or alectinib at our hospital between July 2011 and May 2020. CNS and systemic tumor progression were evaluated using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty‐three and 65 patients were treated with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively. Baseline CNS metastasis was observed in 18 and 27 patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups, respectively. Among the patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups who developed disease progression, 15/49 (30.6%) and 9/44 (20.5%) had CNS progression, respectively (P = .344). Intra‐CNS progression‐free survival was significantly longer in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group (median: 14.0 vs 5.6 months, P = .042). The number of CNS metastases sized ≥3 cm, rate of peritumoral brain edema, and the second progression pattern after treatment continuation was not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

We observed no significant difference in the clinical‐radiographic characteristics of CNS progression between patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatments. Local therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery, for CNS progression may be suitable and important following alectinib and crizotinib treatment.

Monitoring epidermal growth factor receptor C797S mutation in Japanese non-small cell lung cancer patients with serial cell-free DNA evaluation using digital droplet PCR

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is effective in treating both naïve and T790M-mutated EGFR-TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer patients. The EGFR C797S mutation is the major osimertinib resistance mechanism. The present study monitored the EGFR C797S mutation during osimertinib treatment in Japanese patients using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). In our first cohort, C797S detection was validated with tumor specimens and/or plasma samples from 26 patients using ddPCR with custom-designed probes detecting and discriminating T790M and C797S in cis and trans positions. In our second cohort, 18 patients with EGFR-T790M who were going to start osimertinib were analyzed using ddPCR by collecting the plasma samples every month from the beginning of the course of osimertinib. In the first cohort, C797S was detected in 15.4% of patients. C797S and T790M in cis and trans positions were distinguished using ddPCR. In the second cohort, serial cfDNA evaluation revealed that the rate of EGFR mutation changes with disease state. Increases of EGFR mutation were detected, including C797S several months before the diagnosis of disease progression. As with the first cohort, C797S and T790M in cis and trans position were distinguished by ddPCR at disease progression. Coincidentally, in the first cohort, next generation sequencing detected NRAS Q61K mutation and the resistance with NRAS Q61K mutation was overcome by trametinib. In the second cohort, serial cfDNA analysis was useful for evaluating bone oligo-progression and local radiation therapy.

Microsecond-timescale MD simulation of EGFR minor mutation predicts the structural flexibility of EGFR kinase core that reflects EGFR inhibitor sensitivity

Approximately 15–30% of patients with lung cancer harbor mutations in the EGFR gene. Major EGFR mutations (>90% of EGFR-mutated lung cancer) are highly sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Many uncommon EGFR mutations have been identified, but little is known regarding their characteristics, activation, and sensitivity to various EGFR-TKIs, including allosteric inhibitors. We encountered a case harboring an EGFR-L747P mutation, originally misdiagnosed with EGFR-del19 mutation using a routine diagnostic EGFR mutation test, which was resistant to EGFR-TKI gefitinib. Using this minor mutation and common EGFR-activating mutations, we performed the binding free energy calculations and microsecond-timescale molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, revealing that the L747P mutation considerably stabilizes the active conformation through a salt-bridge formation between K745 and E762. We further revealed why several EGFR inhibitors, including the allosteric inhibitor, were ineffective. Our computational structural analysis strategy would be beneficial for future drug development targeting the EGFR minor mutations.

Impact of Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors on the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies in NSCLC Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

The Renin-Angiotensin system (RAS) induces immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, and RAS inhibitors (RASi) improve the tumor immune microenvironment. We evaluated the impact of RASi on the efficacy anti-programmed cell death-1/Ligand-1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies monotherapy as second- or later-line treatment. We classified patients into those with or without use of RASi.

RESULTS

A total of 256 NSCLC patients were included and 37 patients used RASi. The median PFS of patients treated with RASi was significantly longer than that of patients treated without (HR=0.59, 95%CI=0.40-0.88). The median OS of patients treated with RASi tended to be longer than that of patients treated without (HR=0.71, 95%CI=0.45-1.11).

CONCLUSION

The use of RASi was associated with a significantly longer PFS in NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. RASi use may enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.

Clinical influence of switching companion diagnostic tests for EGFR-TKs from Therascreen to Cobas v2

Background

Several companion diagnostic (CDx) tests for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) have been approved. In our institute, the CDx test for EGFR‐TKIs was changed from the Therascreen test (Therascreen) to the Cobas EGFR v2 test (Cobas) because only Cobas was approved for the use of osimertinib in patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with T790M mutations. The clinical influence of switching the CDx test has not yet been examined comprehensively.

Methods

All serial patients with lung cancer tested for EGFR mutations with CDx tests between February 2014 and February 2016 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR) were enrolled in this analysis.

Results

Therascreen was used as a CDx test for EGFR‐TKI therapy in 607 patients between February 2014 and January 2015, and Cobas was used in 621 patients between February 2015 and February 2016. EGFR mutations were detected in 218 patients (35.9%) and 244 patients (39.3%) tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. At the initial diagnosis, 400 and 459 patients were tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. EGFR mutation subtypes, including del19, L858R, and others, were detected in 13.0%, 17.0%, and 2.5% of patients using Therascreen and 17.4%, 14.4%, and 1.5% of patients using Cobas, respectively.

Conclusions

No significant impact of switching from Therascreen to Cobas as the CDx test for EGFR mutations in clinical practice was observed. However, the detection pattern of the EGFR mutation subtypes between the two CDx tests was slightly different.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

We examined the influence of changing the EGFR test in 1228 patients in total. The detection rate of EGFR mutations was similar. However, the detection pattern for EGFR subtype mutations was slightly different between the two tests.

What this study adds

Switching CDx tests from target polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐ to next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based methods may lead to obvious changes in clinical practice. When the CDx test is required to change, the investigation of this influence is warranted in future studies.

Rapid genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer using Oncomine Precision Assay with GenexusTM integrated sequencer

Background

Genomic profiling of tumors from cancer patients facilitates molecular-guided therapy. The turnaround time is one of important issues to deliver results timely for clinical decisions. The Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer automates all next generation sequencing (NGS) workflows and delivers results within a day.

Methods

In this study, we conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the detection rate of genomic alterations from cell-free total nucleic acid (cfTNA, containing cfDNA and cfRNA) of 119 non-small cell lung cancer using Oncomine Precision Assay on Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer. Oncomine Precision Assay (OPA) covers actionable mutations, copy number variations and fusion genes and that are applicable for the selection of targeted therapy. cfTNA isolated from plasma (derived from 14 ml of blood) were subjected to the Genexus system for library construction, templating, sequencing, and data analyses.

Results

The sequencing resulted in median overall depth of 35,773× and median molecular coverage of 2,192× with cfTNA input ranged from 11 to 36 ng. Among the 119 samples evaluated, we detected at least one genomic alteration in plasma cfTNA of 79 cases (66%). When comparing to standard-of-care testing, the sensitivity and specificity of mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer related genes using liquid biopsy with Genexus-OPA ranged between 49–67% and 93–100%, respectively. 59% of actionable mutations, which were present in tumor tissues, were detected by the Genexus- Oncomine Precision Assay using plasma cfTNA. Among the 5 mutations detected from liquid biopsy only, three mutations are of level 1 evidence according to OncoKB database, highlighting the clinical utilities of liquid biopsy in addressing tumor heterogeneity. Extrathoracic metastasis and levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) are found to be associated with increased circulating tumor DNA detection.

Conclusions

The Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer system is an automated, accurate NGS system with short turnaround time (TAT) that could assist clinicians to make more timely decision.

Phase 1/2 study of alectinib in RET-rearranged previously-treated non-small cell lung cancer (ALL-RET)

Background

Rearranged during transfection (RET) rearrangements occur in 1–2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Alectinib administered at doses of 300 mg and 600 mg twice daily (BID) is approved for

ALK

rearranged NSCLC in Japan and other countries, respectively. Since alectinib has activity against RET, we conducted a phase (P) 1/2 study of alectinib to determine its activity in Japanese patients with

RET

rearranged NSCLC.

Methods

This study was a single-arm, open-label, multi-institutional P1/2 trial. Previously treated patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC, screened by nation-wide network (LC-SCRUM-Japan), were recruited. In P1, alectinib (600 or 450 mg BID) was administered following a 3+3 design and its safety was assessed. During P2, alectinib was administered at the recommended dose (RD) determined in P1. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in RET inhibitor-naïve patients treated with the RD of alectinib.

Results

Thirty-four patients were administered alectinib. In cohort 1 (600 mg BID) of P1, we observed 5 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), including grade 3 rash and thromboembolic event, in 3 of 6 patients. In cohort 2 (450 mg BID), we observed no DLTs in 3 patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that AUC_0–10 to 600 mg BID was higher than that previously reported in global trials. We determined 450 mg BID as the RD for P2. In 25 RET inhibitor-naïve patients, one achieved an objective response (4%) and 13 achieved disease control at 8 weeks (52%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.0–5.4), while the median overall survival was 19.0 months (5.4–NE). We observed grade 3 adverse events (AEs) (4%) including pneumonitis in P2.

Conclusions

Alectinib exerts limited activity against RET-rearranged NSCLC. Further investigation to elucidate the mechanisms underlying sensitivity and resistance of RET inhibitors is required to improve outcomes for these patients.

Feasibility of next-generation sequencing test for patients with advanced NSCLC in clinical practice

Background

The usefulness of the Oncomine Dx Target test (Oncomine Dx), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test, has already been proven in clinical trials. However, NGS requires high‐quality tumor samples and takes a long time to generate results. The feasibility of NGS for use in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in clinical practice has not yet been determined.

Methods

Patients serially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in our hospital. The Oncomine Dx, Cobas EGFR mutation test (Cobas EGFR), and ALK‐IHC were performed. The patients were divided into four sets: the full analysis set (FAS) that referred to patients diagnosed with NSCLC, the intent to perform companion diagnostics (CDx) set (IPS) that referred to patients in which CDx had been ordered regardless of sample quality, the per‐performed CDx set (PPS) that referred to patients who could undergo CDx regardless of the results, and the per‐completed CDx set (CCS) that referred to patients in which informative results were received from the CDx.

Results

The total number of patients analyzed in the study was 167. The IPS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (80.2%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (85.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.8%). The CCS/FAS of Oncomine Dx (65.9%) was lower than that of the ALK‐IHC (82.0%) and Cobas EGFR (92.2%). PPS/IPS and CCS/PPS of the Oncomine Dx with nonsurgical biopsy ranged between 78.6% and 90.9%, which was lower than those patients who underwent surgical resection (95.0% and 100%).

Conclusions

The feasibility of Oncomine Dx in clinical practice was lower than the other CDx. The feasibility of Oncomine Dx will increase by improving the biopsy procedure.

Key points

Significant study findings

The usefulness of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) test has been proven in clinical trials.

The feasibility of NGS is lower than other diagnostics in clinical practice especially with regard to nonsurgical biopsy.

What this study adds

It is necessary to improve the feasibility of NGS in clinical practice.

To improve NGS feasibility, turnaround time must be shortened, and larger samples must be obtained during surgical procedures.

Association between continuous decrease of plasma VEGF-A levels and the efficacy of chemotherapy in combination with anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody in non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) plays important roles in tumor immune suppression and thus correlates with the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies. We aimed to determine the association between change in plasma VEGF-A levels and the efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (chemo-PD1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We included NSCLC patients treated with chemo-PD1. Plasma VEGF-A levels were measured at baseline (Pre) and days 7 (D7) and 14 (D14) after the initiation of chemo-PD1. Continuous VEGF-A decrease was determined by comparing Pre with the median value of maximum change rate of posttreatment VEGF-A as cutoff. Patients whose change rates of VEGF-A at both D7 and D14 were consistently lower than the cutoff value were classified into the VEGF-A decrease group, whereas those whose VEGF-A at D7 or D14 were higher than the cutoff level were classified into the VEGF-A no-decrease group. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were evaluated. The median Pre VEGF-A levels was 49 (range, 13-257). The median change rate of VEGF-A at D7 and D14 was -25.6% (range, -77.5-376.9) and -42.3% (range, -100-138.5) respectively. The cutoff value of posttreatment VEGF-A change rate was -9.3%. The PFS was significantly longer in the VEGF-A decrease group than that in the VEGF-A no-decrease group (median, not reached vs 2.4 months; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous decrease of plasma VEGF-A levels during treatment may be associated with the efficacy of chemo-PD1.

Phase II study of the combination of S-1 with bevacizumab for patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and S-1 chemotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This was a prospective single-arm study, including patients with non-squamous NSCLC who had received at least one chemotherapy regimen along with a platinum-based regimen. Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was intravenously administered every 3 weeks, and S-1 40 mg/m² was orally administered twice daily from day 1 (evening) through day 15 (morning). The treatment continued for 3 weeks/cycle until disease progression or until unacceptable toxicities occurred. During the lead-in part, six patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate. In phase II, the primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

In the lead-in part, we evaluated the safety in the first six patients and observed no DLT. In phase II, a total of 46 patients were enrolled from September 2012 to December 2018. The median follow-up duration was 13.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-72.0]. The ORR was 28.3%. The median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI 2.9-5.9) and 15.0 months (95% CI 9.8-30.3), respectively. The most common adverse events were hypertension (65.2%), diarrhea (47.8%), mucositis oral (45.7%), and proteinuria (43.5%), and the most common grade 3 adverse events were hypertension (23.9%) and proteinuria (6.5%). Grade 4/5 adverse events were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab and S-1 combination chemotherapy showed high activity and were well tolerated in patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

A Novel System to Detect Circulating Tumor Cells Using Two Different Size-selective Microfilters

BACKGROUND/AIM

Clusters of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) increase metastatic potential compared to single CTC. However, conventional technologies have been unable to generate an accurate analysis of single and cluster CTCs in the peripheral blood. We propose an effective strategy to detect and isolate both single and cluster CTCs using two size-selective microfilters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five ml of whole blood were collected from 10 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Single and cluster CTCs were identified using precision microfiltration membranes with two distinct pore sizes together with anti-EpCAM antibody labeling.

RESULTS

Single and cluster CTCs were detected by simultaneously using two size-selective microfilters. The EGFR-L858R mutation was detected in the DNA from cells captured using both microfilters.

CONCLUSION

Our method can be used to detect and isolate single and cluster CTCs in the whole blood and may facilitate the development of a liquid biopsy strategy.

Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients having EGFR-activating mutations with or without BIM polymorphisms

PURPOSE

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with BIM deletion polymorphism may have a limited response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, some results of previous reports are discordant. It is necessary to evaluate the relationship between BIM polymorphism and the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. We collected serum samples from patients before EGFR-TKI administration. We analyzed BIM deletion polymorphism and BIM single nucleotide polymorphism in exon 5 c465C > T by the Invader^® assay.

RESULTS

BIM deletion polymorphism was identified in 27 of 194 patients (13.9%). BIM single nucleotide polymorphism was identified in 29 of 194 patients (14.9%). The overall response ratio was 81.5% in patients with BIM deletion polymorphism, 89.7% with BIM single nucleotide polymorphism, and 83.6% with BIM wild type. Median progression-free survival was 10.3 months with BIM deletion polymorphism, 8.5 months with BIM single nucleotide polymorphism, and 10.4 months with BIM wild type. Overall survival was 38.4 months with BIM deletion polymorphism, 29.1 months with BIM single nucleotide polymorphism, and 31.6 months with BIM wild type. There were no significant differences between the groups in overall response ratio, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

BIM polymorphism does not affect EGFR-TKI efficacy.

Poor efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 antibody monotherapy (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy) in patients with active brain metastases (BMs) is not established. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with active BMs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included NSCLC patients treated with second-line or later-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy between December 2015 and August 2019. Patients were classified into those with or without active BMs, including symptomatic BMs requiring systemic steroids and untreated BMs. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients with and without active BMs were compared. Intracranial and extracranial tumor responses were evaluated in patients with active BMs.

RESULTS

We analyzed 197 patients who had received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Among them, 24 had active BMs. Among those without active BMs, 145 had no BMs and 28 had treated asymptomatic BMs. The PFS and OS of patients with active BMs were significantly shorter than those of patients without active BMs (1.3 vs. 2.7 months; P < 0.001, and 4.5 vs. 16.3 months; P = 0.001 respectively). For patients with active BMs, the intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, active BMs, poor performance status (PS), and EGFR/ALK positivity were significant factors associated with shorter PFS. Active BMs and poor PS were significant factors associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was not effective for NSCLC patients with active BMs. Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs.

KEY POINTS

Significant findings of the study: The present study showed that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody monotherapy was not effective for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases. Intracranial and extracranial response rates were 13.3% and 26.7%, respectively.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Further studies on immunotherapy are needed for patients with active BMs.

Phase II trial of S-1 treatment as palliative-intent chemotherapy for previously treated advanced thymic carcinoma

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer with minimal evidence of survival following palliative-intent chemotherapy. Sunitinib, everolimus, and pembrolizumab have been proposed as active agents based on previous phase II trials. In this phase II study, TC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients received S-1 orally twice daily at a dose of 40-60 mg/m² for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off until the progression of the disease or the presence of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The sample size of 26 patients was planned to reject the ORR of 10% under the expectation of 30% with a power of 0.80 and a type I error of 0.05 (one-sided). Twenty-six patients were recruited between 2013 and 2016; 23 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 10 had an ECOG performance status of 0. One patient showed complete response and seven patients showed partial responses, resulting in a 30.8% response rate (90% confidence interval [CI], 18.3-46.9) and an 80.8% disease control rate (90% CI, 65.4-90.3). The median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3-10.3 months) and median OS was 27.4 months (95% CI, 16.6-34.3). Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (12%), skin rash (8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase, and fatigue (4%). No treatment-related death was observed. S-1 confirmed clinical activity with tolerability in patients with previously treated TC. (UMIN000010736).

Addition of ramucirumab enhances docetaxel efficacy in patients who had received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment

OBJECTIVES

Docetaxel (DTX) efficacy increases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/L1) therapy. However, the effect of ramucirumab (Ram) on DTX efficacy following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy is unknown. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effect of Ram on DTX efficacy following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 99 patients with NSCLC, who were divided into those who had (pre-ICI group) or had not (no-ICI group) received anti-PD-1/L1 antibody before DTX. Both groups were then treated with DTX or DTX plus Ram (DTX/Ram). Patient characteristics were compared between the DTX and DTX/Ram groups and adjusted with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores and the following confounding variables: age, sex, performance status, smoking status, histology, driver mutation, and line of treatment. We compared DTX/Ram and DTX in terms of efficacy in both the pre-ICI and no-ICI groups.

RESULTS

In the pre-ICI group, 18 and 21 patients received DTX and DTX/Ram, respectively. In the no-ICI group, 35 and 25 patients received DTX and DTX/Ram. In the no-ICI group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between DTX/Ram- and DTX-treated patients (median PFS, 2.6 versus 1.6 months; p = 0.30, median OS; 8.2 versus 8.0 months; p = 0.30). In the pre-ICI group, PFS was significantly longer in DTX/Ram-treated than in DTX-treated patients (median, 5.9 versus 2.8 months; p = 0.03). Hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.96). The OS of DTX/Ram-treated patients tended to be longer than that of DTX-treated patients (median, 19.8 versus 8.6 months; p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

DTX efficacy following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy may be enhanced by Ram. Further studies are needed to validate the efficacy of inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway following anti-PD-1/L1 therapy.

Efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients with active brain metastases

e14511

Background: The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) for active brain metastases (BMs) is not established, because most clinical trials excluded patients (pts) with active BMs such as untreated, symptomatic, or unstable BMs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pts with active BMs. Methods: This retrospective study included NSCLC pts who had received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy in 2nd or later line between December 2015 and August 2019. Pts who had not evaluated BMs by CT/MRI before anti-PD-(L)1 were excluded. Pts were classified into those with or without active BMs which were defined as untreated or symptomatic BMs or BMs requiring systemic steroids. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of pts with or without active BMs were compared. Intra-cranial and extra-cranial tumor responses were evaluated in pts with active BMs. Results: In this study, 242 pts who had received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were identified and 197 pts were analyzed. Twenty-four pts were classified to pts with active BMs. Among pts without active BMs, 145 pts had no BMs and 28 pts had treated asymptomatic BMs. PFS of pts with active BMs was significantly shorter than that of pts without active BMs (1.3 versus 2.7 months; p < 0.001). OS of pts with active BMs was significantly shorter than that of pts without active BMs (4.5 vs 16.3 months; p = 0.001). Intracranial response rate (RR) was 13.3% (2/15) and extracranial RR was 26.7% (4/15) in pts with active BMs. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, active BM, poor PS and EGFR/ALK(+) were selected as significant factors associated with poor PFS. Active BM and poor PS were selected as significant factors associated with poor OS. Conclusions: Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy is not recommend for pts with active BMs.