Immune checkpoint inhibition and targeted therapy for melanoma: A patient‐oriented cross‐sectional comparative multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Choosing the adequate systemic treatment for melanoma is driven by clinical parameters and personal preferences.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the impact of disease and treatment on the daily life of patients receiving systemic therapy for melanoma.

METHODS

A German-wide, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at 13 specialized skin cancer centres from 08/2020 to 03/2021. A questionnaire was distributed to assess patients' perception of disease and symptoms, the impact of their current treatment on quality of life (QOL) and activities, adverse events (AEs), therapeutic visits, as well as believe in and satisfaction with their current systemic melanoma treatment. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were rated on a continuous numerical rating scale or selected from a given list.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fourteen patients with systemic melanoma therapy were included. 359 (87%) received immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and 55 (13%) targeted therapy (TT). About 1/3 of patients were adjuvantly treated, the remaining because of unresectable/metastatic melanoma. In subgroup analyses, only in the adjuvant setting, TT patients reported a significant decrease in their treatment associated QOL compared to patients with ICI (p = 0.02). Patients with TT were 1.9 times more likely to report AEs than patients with ICI, a difference being significant just for the adjuvant setting (p = 0.01). ICI treatment intervals differed significantly between adjuvant and unresectable/metastatic setting (p = 0.04), though all patients, regardless of their specific ICI drug, evaluated their treatment frequency as adequate. TT patients with dabrafenib/trametinib (n = 37) or encorafenib/binimetinib (n = 15) did not differ regarding the strain of daily pill intake. Patients older than 63 years rated various PROs better than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients evaluated their treatment mainly positively. ICI might be preferred over TT regarding QOL and patient-reported AEs in the adjuvant setting. Older melanoma patients appeared to be less impacted by their disease and more satisfied with their treatment.

Cemiplimab in der Anwendung bei hochbetagten Patienten

Wir berichten über den erfolgreichen Einsatz von Cemiplimab bei insgesamt 23 hochbetagten Patienten mit fortgeschrittenen und/oder metastasierten Plattenepithelkarzinomen, die bei guter Verträglichkeit trotz Komorbiditäten nephrogener oder kardialer Genese, Diabetes und auch bei Vorliegen von Zweitmalignomen ein gutes Ansprechen boten.

Eine komplette Remission konnte bei 10 Patienten, eine partielle Remission bei 8 Patienten erreicht werden. 6 der 7 Patienten mit Zweittumoren zeigten ein Ansprechen. Ein Ansprechen zeichnete sich meist schon nach wenigen Therapiezyklen ab.

[Merkel cell carcinoma in chronic lymphocytic leukemia : Successful treatment with PD-L 1 inhibition, avelumab and chlorambucil]

We report the case of an 85-year-old chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient with a local metastatic MCVPyV-negative Merkel cell carcinoma at initial diagnosis. Therapy comprised surgical excision and radiotherapy but without lymphadenectomy. Six months after the primary diagnosis, liver metastases were detected. They responded to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab for more than 15 months. Thus, we postulate a synergistic effect of combined therapy with chlorambucil and avelumab through a mutual improvement of immune function, from which both diseases benefit.

[Phlebology in German departments of dermatology. An analysis on behalf of the German Society of Phlebology]

BACKGROUND

Phlebologic diseases have become extremely common and have major socio-economic impact. However, the percentage of dermatologists working in phlebology appears to be decreasing according to the data of the German Society of Phlebology (DGP).

METHODS

To investigate the reasons for this development, we--on behalf of the DGP--sent a questionnaire to 120 German Departments of Dermatology in autumn 2012.

RESULTS

In 76 returned questionnaires, the number of physicians with additional fellowship training in phlebology averaged 1.5; the average number of those who fulfill the criteria for training fellows in phlebology was 0.9. In 71.1 % of the departments there was a phlebologist. A special phlebologic outpatient clinic existed in 73.7 % of the departments. Sonography with Doppler (89.5 %) and duplex (86.8 %) was used as the most frequent diagnostic tool. For therapy, compression (94.7 %), sclerotherapy (liquid 78.9 %, foam 63.2 %, catheter 18.4 %), endoluminal thermic procedures (radio wave 28.9 %, laser 17.1 %) and surgery (especially crossectomy and stripping 67.1 %, phlebectomy of tributaries 75 %) were used. The average number of treatments was very heterogenous in the different departments.

CONCLUSIONS

Phlebology definitely plays an important role in dermatology. Most departments fulfill the formal criteria for the license to conduct advanced training in phlebology. A wide spectrum of phlebological diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is available.

[Two cases of side effects of a fumaric acid ester--local therapy]

We report on two cases of adverse reactions to topical treatment with monoethyl fumarate. One patient suffering from atopic dermatitis reacted with contact dermatitis; the other, suffering from psoriasis, developed a generalized, partly pustulous exanthema as well as signs of systemic involvement, such as tachycardia and dyspnea. As the causative mechanism we suggest non-immunological contact urticaria syndrome.

[Malignant melanoma in café-au-lait spot]

A 17-year-old female patient developed a superficially spreading malignant melanoma (level III, thickness 0.91 mm) on a typical café-au-lait spot. There were no metastases, as yet. On the basis of this unusual case, we discuss the incidence of development of malignant melanoma on melanotic spots.