Association of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index [ALI: body mass index × serum albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)] reflects systemic host inflammation, and is easily reproducible. We hypothesized that ALI could assist guidance of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included 672 stage IV NSCLC patients treated with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy in 25 centers in Greece and Germany, and a control cohort of 444 stage IV NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy without subsequent targeted or immunotherapy drugs. The association of clinical outcomes with biomarkers was analyzed with Cox regression models, including cross-validation by calculation of the Harrell's C-index.

Results

High ALI values (>18) were significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) for patients receiving ICI monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.402, P < 0.0001, n = 460], but not chemo-immunotherapy (HR = 0.624, P = 0.111, n = 212). Similar positive correlations for ALI were observed for objective response rate (36% versus 24%, P = 0.008) and time-on-treatment (HR = 0.52, P < 0.001), in case of ICI monotherapy only. In the control cohort of chemotherapy, the association between ALI and OS was weaker (HR = 0.694, P = 0.0002), and showed a significant interaction with the type of treatment (ICI monotherapy versus chemotherapy, P < 0.0001) upon combined analysis of the two cohorts. In multivariate analysis, ALI had a stronger predictive effect than NLR, PD-L1 tumor proportion score, lung immune prognostic index, and EPSILoN scores. Among patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥50% receiving first-line ICI monotherapy, a high ALI score >18 identified a subset with longer OS and time-on-treatment (median 35 and 16 months, respectively), similar to these under chemo-immunotherapy.

Conclusions

The ALI score is a powerful prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-L1 inhibitors alone, but not in combination with chemotherapy. Its association with outcomes appears to be stronger than that of other widely used parameters. For PD-L1-high patients, an ALI score >18 could assist the selection of cases that do not need addition of chemotherapy.

•

ALI is prognostic and predictive for patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy monotherapy, but not chemo-immunotherapy.

•

Its association with outcomes is stronger than that of other parameters (PD-L1 TPS, NLR, lung immune prognostic index, EPSILoN).

•

For PD-L1-high patients, an ALI score >18 could assist the selection of cases that do not need addition of chemotherapy.

Access to Genetic Testing Impacts Oncologists´ Decisions on Ovarian Cancer Personalized Treatment: Lessons Learned From a National Program in Greece

Background: State health insurance authorities in Greece do not reimburse genetic testing for cancer predisposition. The Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology has launched and carries out a national program covering genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations detection, with the financial support of pharmaceutical industry. Aim: This analysis evaluates how, during this program, access to genetic testing transformed the oncologists' therapeutic approach toward their ovarian cancer patients and how the results impacted treatment decisions concerning PARP inhibitors. Adoption of testing by healthy relatives and timing of testing in the disease continuum were also evaluated. Methods: Adult patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma, irrespectively of family history or age at diagnosis were eligible for this program. Genetic counseling was recommended before testing, and both were offered at no financial cost. First degree family members of pathogenic mutation carriers were also offered free counseling and testing. Results: From March 2015 through January 2018, 708 patients were enrolled and tested. One hundred and forty seven (20.7%) mutation carriers were identified, 102 (14.4%) in BRCA1 and 45 (6.3%) in BRCA2 gene. Testing was more often pursued at initial diagnosis (61%) than at recurrence (39%), as recorded for 409 patients with available relevant information. During the 1st year of the program, average monthly tests performed were 25.1, while during the 3rd year this number increased to 34.3 tests per month. Among patients who tested positive for deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations, relapse was reported in 58 patients, 94.8% of which (n= 55) received treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib as per its indication. Family members of 21 patients (14.3%), out of the 147 who tested positive, received genetic counseling and testing for the mutation identified in the context of the program. Conclusion: Free access to genetic testing for BRCA1/2 for ovarian cancer patients and genetic consultation facilitates testing uptake, affects common clinical practice & has major impact on patients and their families. Still, diffusion of genetic information and broader testing of family members require further efforts by the oncological community.

High-Dose Epirubicin as a Single Agent in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer

Fifty-two women with advanced breast cancer were treated with 6 cycles of epirubicin. Even though the study was started with a dose schedule of 110 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, the average treatment interval was 26 days and the median weekly dose 78% of the protocol requirement. Forty-eight patients were evaluable for response; 3 achieved a complete remission which lasted for 17, 24 and 65 weeks, respectively, and 14 a partial remission. Median survival was 32 weeks. Toxicity included nausea/vomiting (68%), anemia (24%), leukopenia (37 %), thrombocytopenia (8 %), alopecia (81 %), stomatitis (24%), diarrhea (14%), fever (19%) and fatigue (14%). Also 1 treatment-related death occurred and 2 cases of arrhythmia. Monotherapy with high doses of epirubicin has definite activity in advanced breast cancer and deserves further study in combination with hematopoietic growth factors which might allow a higher dose Intensity.

Radiation and Concurrent Carboplatin Administration in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Aims and Background

To improve local control in patients with locally advanced inoperable head and neck cancer we administered carboplatin concurrently with radiation.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients entered the study. There were 35 men and 4 women with a median age of 58 years (range, 24-74) and a median performance status of 90 (range, 60-100) of the Karnofsky scale. The primary site included nasopharynx (5 patients), oropharynx (n=10), hypopharynx (n=5), larynx (n=12), oral cavity (n=2), paranasal sinuses (n=3), salivary glands (n=1) and unknown (n=1). Histology was squamous cell carcinoma in all cases. All patients were irradiated with a 60Co unit. According to the protocol, they should receive 66-70 Gy to the tumor area and 45 Gy to the tumor-free area of the neck. Carboplatin was administered at a dose of 400 mg/m2 on days 2, 22 and 42.

Results

Totally, 112 cycles of carboplatin were administered, of which 106 (95%) were at full dose. Median dose intensity of carboplatin actually delivered was 170 mg/m2/week (range, 57-200). All patients were irradiated, although only 30 (77%) received >66 Gy. After the completion of combined treatment, 23 (59%, 95% C.I. 42-74%) achieved a CR and 10 (26%, 95% C.I. 13-42%) a PR. Grade 3-4 myelotoxicity was noticed in 60% of the patients. Other grade 3-4 toxicities included stomatitis (13%), dysphagia (5%) and weight loss (3%). Median time to progression was 18 months (range, 2-25).

Conclusions

Radiation and concurrent administration of carboplatin determined a high CR rate in patients with HNC, although the superiority of this combined modality approach over radiation alone has to be proven in phase III trials.

Carboplatin, Continuous Infusion Fluorouracil and Mid-cycle High-dose Methotrexate as Initial Treatment in Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Forty-nine patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy prior to definitive local treatment (surgery and/or radiation therapy). Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin 300 mg/m2 on day 1, fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 daily as a continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 and high-dose methotrexate 1.2 g/m2 with leucovorin rescue on day 14. After completing the induction chemotherapy, 9 patients (18%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 26 (54%) a partial remission (PR), 7 had stable disease and 7 a progression. The response rates increased to 53% CR and 18% PR following locoregional treatment. Survival at 12 months was 61% and its actuarial probability at 24 months 31%. Median time to progression was 14 months. Toxicity from chemotherapy was generally mild. Nausea was observed in 35%, vomiting in 26%, stomatitis in 57%, anemia in 22%, leukopenia in 36%, thrombocytopenia in 26% and diarrhea in 6% of the patients. In conclusion, the combination of carboplatin, 5-day continuous-infusion fluorouracil and mid-cycle high-dose methotrexate is a moderately effective, well tolerated regimen in patients with SCCHN but does not seem superior to the combination of carboplatin and fluorouracil only.

A Randomized Open-Label Parallel-Group Study Comparing Ondansetron with Ondansetron plus Dexamethasone in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving High-Dose Epirubicin. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

The purpose of this multicenter randomized, open-label, parallel-group study was to assess whether the addition of low-dose dexamethasone to ondansetron results in improved control of chemotherapy-induced emesis in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin.

METHODS & STUDY DESIGN

Patients were randomized to receive either 24 mg of ondansetron or 24 mg of ondansetron plus 8 mg of dexamethasone administered as an intravenous infusion 30 minutes prior to administration of chemotherapy. Both groups of patients received 8 mg of ondansetron given orally from day 2 to 5 two times daily. Fifty-three patients received ondansetron and 50 received ondansetron plus dexamethasone. The patients recorded nausea and the number of vomits and retches daily on diary cards.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients in the ondansetron plus dexamethasone group experienced neither vomiting nor retching during the first day of the first course of chemotherapy compared to those receiving ondansetron alone (79.6% vs 53.8%, P = 0.0062). Furthermore, there was a trend in favor of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the control of nausea. There was no statistically significant difference between ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus ondansetron alone in protecting patients from emesis between days 2 and 5 of the first course of chemotherapy (66.7% vs 62.7%, P = 0.68). This was probably due to the small sample size. Ondansetron was well tolerated, with 15 patients (15%) reporting adverse events such as headache or constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that ondansetron given intravenously in combination with dexamethasone is more effective than ondansetron alone in the control of acute emesis in patients undergoing their first course of chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin. No difference between the regimens was found with regard to nausea and delayed emesis control.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), α-fetoprotein, CA 19.9 and CA 125 in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (ACC)

In 111 patients with ACC we studied CEA, FP, CA-125 and CA 19.9 during therapy and follow-up. Marker determination was performed every two months. CEA was elevated (> 5 ng/ml) in 82%, αFP(> 15 ng/ml) in 0%, CA-125 (>38 U/ml) in 37%, CA 19.9 (> 30 U/ml) in 64% of the patients. We did not find significant differences between the sensititivity of CEA alone and that of the combination of CEA + CA-125 (86%), CEA + CA 19.9 (87%), CA-125 + CA-19.9 (71%) and CEA + CA-125 + CA 19.9 (88%). We did not find any correlation between the level of positivity of the markers and the clinical parameters we examined. When serial determinations were carried out, CEA showed the best indication of response to treatment, followed by CA 19.9. In the evaluation of the response to chemotherapy we found that CA 125 presented significant percentages of false-positive (9%) (P < 0.008) and false-negative (8.1%) (P < 0.008) results, compared to CEA and CA 19.9. CA 125 did not demonstrate any utility for the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer although increased values were found in 37%. We conclude that CEA is currently the best marker for the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. The combination of CEA and CA 19.9 had some utility in follow-up, without significantly improving CEA results

Abstract P1-07-03: Evaluation of the prognostic value of CD3, CD8 and FOXP3 mRNA expression in early breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy

Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been shown to be of prognostic value in several cancer types. In early breast cancer, TILs have a prognostic utility, as well, especially in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TILs presence is broadly associated with improved survival, however there is controversy regarding TILs subpopulations. In general, T cell infiltration is higher in non-luminal and more aggressive tumors, like the basal-like subtype. Among TILs subpopulations, CD8-positive T cell infiltration is associated with better outcome, whereas high numbers of FOXP3-positive T regulatory cells are associated with worse outcome in ER-positive tumors and better outcome in HER2-positive and TNBC tumors.

Patients and Methods: Early breast cancer patients, treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy within two randomized trials (HE10/97 and HE10/00) were included in the study. We evaluated, by qRT-PCR, 826 macrodissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples for mRNA expression of CD3, CD8 and FOXP3for potential prognostic significance in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). TILs were evaluated in whole sections as percent of total cells.

Results: Median age was 52.7 years, while 54.2% of the patients were postmenopausal and 79.0% ER/PgR-positive. After a median follow-up of 133.0 months, 255 patients (30.9%) had died and 314 (38.0%) had disease progression. All three mRNA markers were positively correlated with TILs (Spearman's r=0.52 for CD3, 0.41 for CD8 and 0.47 for FOXP3, all p-values &lt;0.001), while Ki67 protein expression was greater in tumors with high mRNA expression (median cut-off) of the markers (Mann-Whitney, all p-values &lt;0.001). Additionally, tumors of higher histological grade and negative ER/PgR status were more frequent in patients with high CD3, CD8 or FOXP3 mRNA expression, as compared to patients with low expression, (chi-square, p-values &lt;0.010). In the univariate analysis, high CD3 and CD8 mRNA expression was found to be of favorable prognostic value for DFS (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92, Wald's p=0.007 and HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.95, p=0.016, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the association of high CD8 mRNA expression with increased DFS was retained (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99, p=0.048), whereas that of high CD3 mRNA expression was of marginal statistical significance (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.59-1.01, p=0.059). Moreover, a significant interaction was observed between HER2 status and CD3 mRNA expression with respect to DFS (interaction p=0.032). In the HER2-positive subgroup, the hazard ratio associated with high CD3 mRNA expression was of greater magnitude (HR=0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.76, p=0.002) compared to the hazard ratio presented above, for the entire cohort. No significant findings were observed for FOXP3 in terms of DFS, while none of the studied markers were of prognostic value for OS.

Conclusions: High CD3 and CD8 mRNA expression in early breast cancer patients is of prognostic value for decreased risk for relapse and, in the future, could potentially be of importance in deciding the most appropriate therapeutic strategy in light of the recent immune-related treatment developments.

Citation Format: Tsiatas M, Kalogeras KT, Manousou K, Wirtz RM, Gogas H, Veltrup E, Zagouri F, Lazaridis G, Koutras A, Christodoulou C, Pentheroudakis G, Petraki C, Bafaloukos D, Pectasides D, Kosmidis P, Samantas E, Karanikiotis C, Papakostas P, Dimopoulos M-A, Fountzilas G. Evaluation of the prognostic value of CD3, CD8 and FOXP3 mRNA expression in early breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-03.

Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with weekly docetaxel

The aim of the study was to evaluate the association of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genotypes with treatment efficacy in a phase II trial. This study evaluated weekly docetaxel, as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Existing data from in vitro and animal model experiments suggest that docetaxel at low doses has anti-angiogenic activity. DNA was extracted from blood samples of 86 patients participating in the trial. Genotyping was performed for selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; VEGF-2578, -1498, -1154, and +936). Moreover, due to the highly polymorphic nature of the studied areas, we were able to analyze additional registered SNPs. All candidate genotypes were evaluated for associations with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. The VEGF-1154 GG genotype was more frequent in patients not responding to treatment compared with responders (42.9% vs 0.0%, P=0.048). Moreover, the VEGF-2578 AA genotype was associated with longer PFS compared with CC (hazard ratio (HR)=0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.98; pairwise P=0.0457). Patients with the VEGF-1190 GG genotype demonstrated shorter PFS compared with those with the alternative genotypes (GA and AA) combined (HR=3.85; 95% CI: 1.20-12.50; P=0.0224). In addition, the VEGF-2551/-2534 homozygous del18bp and VEGF-2430/-2425 homozygous ins1bp genotypes were associated with worse PFS compared with no deletion and no insertion, respectively (HR=2.49; 95% CI: 1.02-6.07; pairwise P=0.0442 and HR=2.57; 95% CI: 1.05-6.27; pairwise P=0.0385, respectively). Furthermore, patients with the VEGF-1498 CC genotype exhibited longer median OS compared with those with the alternatives genotypes (CT and TT) combined (HR=0.27; 95% CI: 0.08-0.89; P=0.0311). In multivariate analysis, the VEGF-2578 AA genotype retained its significance (P=0.0220) for PFS. Our results support the association of specific VEGF genotypes with clinical outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with a potentially anti-angiogenic regimen, such as weekly docetaxel. However, current results should be validated prospectively in larger cohorts.

Adjuvant therapy in primary GIST: state-of-the-art

BACKGROUND

The management of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) has evolved with the introduction of adjuvant therapy. Recently reported results of the SSG XVIII/AIO trial by the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) and the German Working Group on Medical Oncology (AIO) represent a significant change in the evidence for adjuvant therapy duration. The objectives of this European Expert Panel meeting were to describe the optimal management and best practice for the systemic adjuvant treatment of patients with primary GISTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A panel of medical oncology experts from European sarcoma research groups were invited to a 1-day workshop. Several questions and discussion points were selected by the organising committee prior to the conference. The experts reviewed the current literature of all clinical trials available on adjuvant therapy for primary GISTs, considered the quality evidence and formulated recommendations for each discussion point.

RESULTS

Clinical issues were identified and provisional clinical opinions were formulated for adjuvant treatment patient selection, imatinib dose, duration and patient recall, mutational analysis and follow-up of primary GIST patients. Adjuvant imatinib 400 mg/day for 3 years duration is a standard treatment in all patients with significant risk of recurrence following resection of primary GISTs. Patient selection for adjuvant therapy should be based on any of the three commonly used patient risk stratification schemes. R1 surgery (versus R0) alone is not an indication for adjuvant imatinib in low-risk GIST. Recall and imatinib restart could be proposed in patients who discontinued 1-year adjuvant imatinib within the previous 3 months and may be considered on a case-by-case basis in patients who discontinued within the previous year. Mutational analysis is recommended in all cases of GISTs using centralised laboratories with good quality control. Treatment is not recommended in an imatinib-insensitive D842V-mutated GIST. During adjuvant treatment, patients are recommended to be clinically assessed at 1- to 3-month intervals. Upon discontinuation, computed tomography scan (CT) scans are recommended every 3 to 4 months for 2 years when the risk of relapse is highest, followed by every 6 months until year 5 and annually until year 10 after treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Key points in systemic adjuvant treatment and clinical management of primary GISTs as well as open questions were identified during this European Expert Panel meeting on GIST management.

Zoledronic acid in patients with stage IIIA/B NSCLC: results of a randomized, phase III study

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases are common in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can have devastating consequences. Preventing or delaying bone metastases may improve outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated whether zoledronic acid (ZOL) delayed disease progression or recurrence in patients with controlled stage IIIA/B NSCLC after first-line therapy. Patients received vitamin D and calcium supplementation and were randomized to i.v. ZOL (every 3-4 weeks) or no treatment (control). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

No significant intergroup differences were observed in PFS or overall survival (OS). Median PFS was 9.0 months with ZOL versus 11.3 months for control. Fifteen ZOL-treated (6.6%) and 19 control patients (9.0%) developed bone metastases. Estimated 1-year OS was 81.8% for each group. ZOL safety profile was consistent with previous clinical data, but with higher discontinuations versus control. Fifteen ZOL-treated (6.6%) and five control patients (2.3%) had renal adverse events. Two cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

ZOL did not significantly affect PFS or OS in stage IIIA/B NSCLC patients with controlled disease, with a trend toward worsening PFS in the longer-term follow-up. Few patients experienced bone metastases, possibly limiting the potential ZOL impact on disease course.

Third CECOG consensus on the systemic treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The current third consensus on the systemic treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) builds upon and updates similar publications on the subject by the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG), which has published such consensus statements in the years 2002 and 2005 (Zielinski CC, Beinert T, Crawford J et al. Consensus on medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer--update 2004. Lung Cancer 2005; 50: 129-137). The principle of all CECOG consensus is such that evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment are given upon which all participants and authors of the manuscript have to agree (Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al. Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20 (11): 1771-1785). This is of particular importance in diseases in which treatment options depend on very particular clinical and biologic variables (Zielinski CC, Beinert T, Crawford J et al. Consensus on medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer--update 2004. Lung Cancer 2005; 50: 129-137; Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al. Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20 (11): 1771-1785). Since the publication of the last CECOG consensus on the medical treatment of NSCLC, a series of diagnostic tools for the characterization of biomarkers for personalized therapy for NSCLC as well as therapeutic options including adjuvant treatment, targeted therapy, and maintenance treatment have emerged and strongly influenced the field. Thus, the present third consensus was generated that not only readdresses previous disease-related issues but also expands toward recent developments in the management of NSCLC. It is the aim of the present consensus to summarize minimal quality-oriented requirements for individual patients with NSCLC in its various stages based upon levels of evidence in the light of a rapidly expanding array of individual therapeutic options.

Mechanisms of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical and molecular considerations

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is anticipated to respond to small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the EGFR tyrosine kinase. There are, however, patients with EGFR mutated tumors who do not demonstrate tumor response. The most widely accepted mechanism of 'de novo' (inherent) resistance to these TKIs involves mutations of the KRAS gene. KRAS is a downstream mediator of EGFR-induced cell signaling, such mutations appear to be mutually exclusive from EGFR mutations in lung cancer. The first molecular modifier of resistance identified in patients who developed resistance (termed 'acquired resistance') to TK inhibition was a new acquired somatic EGFR mutation (T790M). Today there is an ever-growing series of molecular events that have recently come to the forefront to explain other instances of TKI resistance not attributable to T790M or KRAS. These include a number of molecules that interact with EGFR or form part of its downstream signaling pathway such as HER-2, IGFR-1, MET and B-RAF. Considering that the majority of studies carried out to date with respect to the identification of resistant clones have not used highly sensitive techniques (e.g. allelic discrimination to identify somatic mutations), coupled with the relatively low number of studies examining multiple molecular markers and the accepted molecular heterogeneity of NSCLC raise question as to the existence of 'acquired' versus 'de-novo' resistance. By examining the current knowledge base with respect to mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs in NSCLC, we explore whether 'acquired' resistance is 'de-novo' resistance in disguise, and discuss the promises and limitations of molecular stratification with respect to strategies incorporating TKIs in the treatment of NSCLC.

EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number as a potential biomarker of survival for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving single-agent treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

We systematically identified articles investigating EGFR gene copy number by fluorescent or chromogenic in situ hybridization in patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with the TKIs erlotinib or gefitinib, (last search: 31 June 2009). Eligible studies had to report on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or time-to-progression (TTP), stratified by EGFR gene copy number. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Among 255 identified studies, 20 (1689 patients, 594 with increased gene copy number), 10 (822 patients, 290 with increased gene copy number) and 5 (294 patients, 129 with increased gene copy number) were eligible for the OS, PFS and TTP meta-analyses, respectively. Increased EGFR gene copy number was associated with increased OS (HR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.89; P = 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.46-0.79; P<0.001) and TTP (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.28-0.91; P = 0.02). Among predominantly white populations, increased EGFR gene copy number was strongly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82; P<0.001), whereas it did not influence survival in East Asians (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.82-1.50; P=0.50). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Among TKI-treated patients, increased EGFR gene copy number appears to be associated with improved survival outcomes. The effect on OS appears to be limited to patients of non-Asian descent.

Non small cell lung cancer in the elderly: clinico-pathologic, management and outcome characteristics in comparison to younger patients

It is controversial whether non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the elderly constitutes a distinct clinico-biological entity compared to younger counterparts. As reported data are scant and discordant, we sought to analyze retrospectively the medical records of Hellenic NSCLC patients aged >70 years and compare them with those of age (70-45 years) and younger (<45 years) patients. Records were abstracted from the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) cancer registry database. Presentation, management and outcome data of 417 elderly patients aged > or =70, 1374 age 70-45 years old and 115 patients aged < or =45 years old with histologically confirmed NSCLC managed from 1989 until 2004 were retrieved and compared. Elderly patients differed significantly in terms of presence of symptoms (p<0.001), including thoracic pain (p=0.003), dyspnea (p<0.001), cough (p<0.001) and fatigue (p<0.001), eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 2-3 (p<0.001), and histological type (more commonly diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (p<0.002) and less frequently with adenocarcinoma). Although elderly patients had significantly higher rates of PS 2-3, they had significantly better median time to disease progression (TTP) compared to the younger counterpart (6.4 versus 4.3 months p=0.047). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between elderly and young patients (median OS 11.8 versus 11.5 months; p=0.6), but platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy were variables associated favorably with TTP and survival in the elderly. This large retrospective series presents strong evidence that NSCLC constitutes a similar clinicopathologic entity in elderly and young individuals with discretely differing biological behavior and that elderly symptomatic patients should be considered for effective anticancer treatment whenever possible.

Paclitaxel versus oral vinorelbine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with performance status (PS) 2: A randomized phase II study

e19035

Background: The optimal treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and PS 2 is not well established. Our group has shown that single agent is equally effective to doublets. Purpose of this study was to compare efficacy and toxicity of two single agents Paclitaxel and oral Vinorelbine. Methods: 75 stage IIIb wet and IV chemotherapy-naïve for metastatic disease patients with PS 2 were randomized to either Paclitaxel 90mg/m2 weekly (group A: 36pts) or Vinorelbine 60mg/m2 weekly (group B: 34pts). Both agents were given for three weeks on and one week off. Results: A total of 70 out of 75 patients were eligible for analysis. All patient and disease characteristics were well balanced. Partial response rate (PR) was 14% (95% CI, 4.7%-29.5%) and 6% (95% CI, 0.7%- 19.7%) for groups A and B respectively. Stable disease (SD) was 17% (95% CI, 6.4%-32.8%) and 12% (95% CI, 3.3%-27.5%) respectively. These rates did not differ significantly. Median survival (OS) was 5.3m (95% CI, 3.1–7.5 m) and 3.5m (95% CI, 1.6 - 5.4 m) respectively (P=0.6). Progression free survival (PFS) was 3.2m (95% CI, 1.9 - 4.6 m) and 2.1m (95% CI, 1.8 - 2.3 m) respectively (P=0.2). There was a non-statistically significant trend for more myelotoxicity in the vinorelbine group. Conclusions: A trend for higher efficacy and less toxicity of Paclitaxel in comparison to oral Vinorelbine was observed, without however reaching statistical significance.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-operable localized non-small cell lung cancer. A hellenic cooperative oncology group (HeCOG) phase II study

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has become a standard therapy for locoregionally advanced inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy following induction with non-platinum chemotherapy in patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with locally advanced inoperable NSCLC ECOG performance status (PS): 0-1 following staging received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 in a 3-h infusion on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for two cycles. The patients with a response or stable disease (SD) continued to receive paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 weekly and radiotherapy 63 Gy given at 1.8 Gy once a day for 7 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-three eligible patients entered the study. The median age was 63 years (range 42-76), male 93%, IIIB 63% and IIIA 37%. Following induction 15 (36.5%) of the patients responded: complete response (CR), 2%; partial response (PR), 33%; and 19 (46.5%) SD. From those with SD, 7 (37%) improved to a PR following concurrent chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 44 months (95% CI: range 36-53) the median survival was 20.8 months (95% CI: range 15.4-26.3) and time-to-progression 8.4 months (95% CI: range 6.2-10.6). The median survival of those who had improved response from SD to PR was 31.4 months (95% CI: range 18.7-44.1) versus 20.8 months (95% CI: range 5.5-11.3) for those who had no improvement (p=0.20). The commonest grade 3/4 toxicity in induction was neutropenia 12% with 2 febrile neutropenic patients whereas in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy neutropenia, neurotoxicity and oesophagitis were observed in 6% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy following induction chemotherapy in patients with stage III NSCLC is feasible with reasonable efficacy and acceptable toxicity.

Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study of the Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan as first-line treatment in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (E-SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemo-naïve adult patients with a performance status (PS) of 0-2 and adequate organ function were eligible. Patients received cisplatin 20mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days, etoposide 75mg/m(2) i.v. daily for three consecutive days and irinotecan 120mg/m(2) i.v. on day 2, every 21 days for six to eight cycles. Administration of G-CSF was given in the presence of febrile neutropenia and as a 5-day prophylaxis around the recorded nadir day in patients who developed grades 3-4 neutropenia.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were assessable. The median age was 62.2 years; 96.4% had PS 0-1, 33.5% had >3 metastatic sites. The overall response rate was 80.4% with 8 (14.3%) patients achieving a complete response. The median time to tumor progression was 7.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.1-8.6 months] with a median survival of 15.1 months [95% CI, 9.7-20.5 months] and 1-year survival rate of 56.5%. One patient died from toxicity. Grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37.5% of patients, grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 10.9% of patients and 11 (19.6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicities were primarily nausea-vomiting 3.6%, diarrhea 7.1% and fatigue 3.6%.

CONCLUSION

This study strongly suggests that cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan combination is very effective for the treatment of E-SCLC with good safety profile. The triplet regimen currently seems a promising regimen and has to be further explored in phase III trials.

Gemcitabine (G) combined with gefitinib in patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. A phase II trial

15016

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers, with a high incidence of overexpression of EGFR and its ligands. Gemcitabine (G) is the treatment of choice in this tumor. Patients and Methods: From June 2004 to May 2006, 54 patients were registered in the study. Median age was 65 years (range 44–80) and median Karnofsky performance status was 80%. G (1000 mg/m2) was administered weekly for 7 cycles. Gefitinib (250 mg) was given orally. EGFR, HER-2 and PTEN were assessed by IHC and FISH. Biopsies containing =70% tumor were evaluated for the presence of somatic mutations in exons 18–21 of EGFR and exon 2 of RAS by bi-directional sequencing. Results: Ten patients (19%) completed treatment, while 36 patients (67%) progressed before the completion of the treatment. Three patients (6%) had a partial response and 11 patients (20%) had stable disease. After a median follow-up of 9 months, median survival time was 7.4 months, while median time to disease progression (TTP) was 3.9 months. The one-year survival rate was 23%. Rash of any grade was reported in 28 patients (52%). Most common severe toxicities were neutropenia (13%) and leucopenia (6%). RAS mutations were identified in 18/34 patients (53%). Two additional patients had an EGFR point mutation in exon 20. EGFR expression was found in 23/30 patients (77%), while EGFR amplification was not observed. HER-2 gain was detected in 4/20 patients and PTEN deletion in 14/20 patients. PTEN expression was noticed in 7/30 patients and was the only marker associated with significantly increased TTP (p=0.008). Conclusions: The results from this small single arm study were similar to those seen with G plus erlotinib with respect to median and one-year survival. These findings, and the selection of patients with better prognosis based on molecular markers, need to be confirmed in a larger study.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Simultaneous deregulation of p16 and cyclin D1 genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a combined immunohistochemistry and image analysis study based on tissue microarrays

PURPOSE

Deregulation of cell cycle control molecules, such as cyclins and their inhibitors, is a crucial event in the carcinogenetic process. Our aim was to identify potential correlations between p16 and cyclin D1 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that affect the biological behavior of this neoplasm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using tissue microarray (TMA) technology, 50 paraffin-embedded tissue samples of histologically confirmed primary PDACs were cored twice and re-embedded to the final recipient block. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using monoclonal anti-p16 and anti-cyclin D1 antibodies. Protein expression levels were determined by performing computerized image analysis (CIA; estimation of Nuclear Labeling Index-NLI). SPSS (chi square test and interrater Cohen's kappa) was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Cyclin D1 overexpression was observed in 24/50 (48%) of the examined carcinomas, whereas p16 loss or reduced expression was detected in 40/50 (80%) cases. Statistical significance was noted when correlating grade to cyclin D1 (p=0.038), stage to p16 (p=0.012) and also to cyclin D1 (p=0.011). Interestingly, combined protein alterations (p16 loss and cyclin D1 overexpression) were observed in 23/50 (46%) cases associated with advanced stage (p=0.019). Overall combined expression of the two molecules demonstrated a significantly low value (kappa=0.012; 95% confidence interval-CI: 0.010-0.014).

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of PDACs is characterized by simultaneous protein alterations regarding p16 and cyclin D1 genes. This mechanism of genetic deregulation in cell cycle potentially explains in part the aggressive phenotype of this neoplasm.

Mitoxantrone plus gemcitabine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Gemcitabine and mitoxantrone have both shown significant antitumor activity in patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination as second or third-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Forty-six previously treated patients with MBC were enrolled from June 2000 to November 2002. Mean age was 56 years and ECOG performance status was < or =2. All patients received mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, D8 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, D1+8 every 21 days for 6 cycles. There were no complete responders. Objective response was observed in 12 patients (26%), 15 (33%) patients had stable disease, 15 (33%) had progressive disease and 4 (9%) were non-evaluable. At median follow-up of 27.8 months, overall survival was 13.3 months (range 0.6-33.8+) and the median time to disease progression (TTP) was 4.4 months (range 0.2-33.8). Toxicities (grade 3-4) were as follows: leukopenia 18 (39%), neutropenia 19 (41%), thrombocytopenia 4 (8.5%), anemia 6 (13%) and alopecia 1 (2%). Febrile neutropenia was recorded in 2 (4%) patients. There were no treatment related deaths. The authors conclude that the combination of mitoxantrone and gemcitabine is an effective regimen in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Toxicity was manageable.

Vinflunine -- an active chemotherapy for treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with a platinum-based regimen: results of a phase II study

A multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial designed to determine the efficacy of single-agent vinflunine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with a platinum-based regimen. The objectives were to assess efficacy in terms of tumour response rate (primary end point), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and to evaluate the toxicity associated with this treatment. Patients with advanced NSCLC with progressive disease having failed prior platinum-based first-line treatment for advanced disease. Five responses out of the 63 treated patients were documented by WHO criteria and validated by an independent panel review (IRP), yielding a response rate of 7.9% (95% CI: 2.6–17.6) in the intent-to-treat analysis and 8.3% (95% CI: 2.8–18.4) in the evaluable population. Disease control was achieved in 35 out of 60 evaluable patients (58.3%). The median duration of response (complete response+partial response), according to modified WHO criteria was 7.8 months (95% CI: 4.6–NR). Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.4–3.8), and the median survival was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.8–9.2). Grades 3–4 neutropenia was reported in 50% of patients; febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients (3.2%); grades 3–4 myalgia and grade 3 constipation were experienced by 10 (15.9%) and six (9.5%) of patients, respectively. Constipation was manageable, noncumulative and could be prevented with laxative prophylaxis. The encouraging results from this phase II study with vinflunine warrant further investigations in phase III trials as second- or first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma, as a single agent or in combination with other active drugs.

Non-small cell lung cancer in the young: a retrospective analysis of diagnosis, management and outcome data

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in young patients is uncommon and is thought to constitute a distinct oncological entity with characteristic clinicopathological patterns. Since the reported data are scant and discordant, the presentation, management and outcome data of NSCLC patients aged under 45 years of age were analyzed and compared with those of patients over 45 years old. Prognostic factors for risk classification were also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data were abstracted from the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) cancer registry database. The presentation, management and outcome data of patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, managed from 1989 until 2004 in HeCOG participating centers, were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients aged < and > than 45 years old were compared and evaluated for prognostic significance regarding outcome.

RESULTS

The data for NSCLC patients (1906), of whom 115 were aged <45, were retrieved. In comparative analysis, the young patients were more frequently asymptomatic at diagnosis, while older patients presented significantly higher rates of thoracic pain, cough and fatigue (p<0.01). The young patients were more commonly diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and less frequently with squamous cancer than patients aged over 45. Although the stage distribution was distinct, with older patients presenting higher rates of stage IV disease (21.9% vs. 12.2%), the rates of early lung cancer (stages I-IIIa) were similar. The overall survival (OS) was not significantly different (median OS 12 vs. 11.5 months, p=0.277). Among patients who underwent first-line palliative chemotherapy, young individuals had a significantly shorter time to progression: 4.3 vs. 5.8 months (p=0.0049). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses established the prognostic usefulness of the performance status, disease stage and disease-free interval for the risk of death, both in the total number of patients (1906) and in young patients (115).

CONCLUSION

This large retrospective series failed to present strong evidence that NSCLC among young individuals constitutes a distinct clinicopathological entity with differing biological behavior, since the same clinicopathological prognostic factors were valid in both age groups. Molecular phenotypic studies are needed to shed light on this controversial subject.

A randomised phase II study comparing irinotecan (IRI) plus leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) versus IRI-LV-5FU followed be oxaliplatin (OXA) plus LV-5FU in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)

3583

Background: IRI and OXA are both effective in the treatment of CRC. A theoretical framework supports the hypothesis that sequential administration of cytotoxic drugs at adequate doses can maximize the cell kill and overcome drug resistance. The aim of the study was to compare the response rate (RR), the time to tumor progression (TTP), the overall survival (OS) and to assess the toxicity profile of previously untreated patients with advanced CRC randomly assigned between IRI-LV-5FU (arm A) versus IRI-LV-5FU followed by OXA-LV-5FU (arm B). Methods: Intent to treat analysis was performed on 429 patients (219 in arm A and 210 in arm B) who were randomized from 31/10/2001 to 21/10/2004. The treatment schedules consisted of weekly IRI, 80 mg/m2 or OXA, 45 mg/m2 plus LV 200 mg/m2 followed immediately by intravenous bolus 5FU, 450 mg/m2 for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment was continued for 4 cycles, patients in arm B were treated initially with IRI-LV-5FU for 2 cycles followed by sequential administration of 2 cycles of OXA-LV-5FU. Results: The study failed to show any superiority of the sequential regimen. There were no significant differences between the two arms in the overall RR (26% versus 28%, p=0.631), TTP (Median, 7.8 versus 8.4 months, p=0.149). Toxicity profiles (grade III and IV) were equally frequent in both arms (diarrhea 13% versus 13.5%, febrile neutropenia 2% versus 1.5%, neurotoxicity 0% versus 0.5%). Conclusions: IRI-LV-5FU or IRI-LV-5FU followed by QXA-LV-5FU show equally substantial activities with manageable toxicity profile in advanced CRC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Carboplatin and paclitaxel versus cisplatin, paclitaxel and doxorubicin for frontline chemotherapy of advanced ovarian carcinoma (AOC): A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study

5074

Background: Carboplatin combined with paclitaxel are considered treatment of choice as initial chemotherapy for AOC. We compared this combination with a regimen combining cisplatin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin. In the pre-taxane era the addition of doxorubicin to the cisplatin-based regimens appeared to improve survival. Therefore, there was a significant interest in assessing the role of a taxane/platinum/ anthracycline combination therapy in a randomized study. Methods: Patients with AOC after the initial cytoreductive surgery were stratified according to the FIGO stage and the presence of residual disease and randomized to either 6 courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as 3h infusion plus carboplatin 7AUC (group A) or paclitaxel at the same dose plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 and G-CSF (Lenograsim) 0.263 mg sc from day 7 to day 11 (group B). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). At alpha = 5%, 400 patients were required, to detect with power of 80%, a ±15% difference to a baseline survival rate of 50% at the 3-year time point. Results: Intent to treat analysis was performed on 432 patients (group A: 210, B: 222). The treatment groups were well balanced in terms of major patient and tumor characteristics. 70% of the patients had stage III and 23% stage IV disease. Significantly more patients developed febrile neutropenia in group B (p = 0.01). No other significant differences were observed in terms of severe toxicity and no difference was found between the two groups in complete and overall response rate. With a median follow up of 44 months, median survival was 37.2 months in group A and 45.2 months in group B (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Both regimens are well tolerated and effective as first line chemotherapy of AOC. Combination of cisplatin, paclitaxel and doxorubicin does not seem to improve survival as compared with the standard carboplatin/paclitaxel regimen.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Predictive markers for the treatment of colorectal cancer with cetuximab

13500

Background: Cetuximab is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody with activity in colorectal cancer. Patients most likely to benefit should be identified using molecular markers. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with cetuximab who had paraffin embedded tissue available for testing. Tumor specimens were tested for EGFR (31G7, Zymed), PTEN (28H6, Novocastra) and pAkt 1/2/3 (Thr 308, Santa Cruz) expression by IHC. The EGFR gene status was investigated by FISH (Vysis). Results: Seventy-two patients were identified. EGFR expression was detected in 32/68 patients tested. PTEN was positive in all cases tested (64/64) and pAkt in 52 of 64 patients, in >70% of cells in 21/64 cases. Most patients were treated with cetuximab in various combinations, three patients received it as a single agent and 7 patients in more than one line of therapy. Median follow-up from diagnosis was 30.7 months and from Cetuximab initiation 6.9 months. Median survival from diagnosis has not been reached yet but from initiation of Cetuximab it is 13.6 months. 19 patients achieved a PR and 1 a CR. Most patients with PR were treated in first or second line however, 6 patients achieved a PR in 3rd line and 3 in subsequent lines. The patient with complete response, was treated in first line with CPT 11 and Cetuximab. TTP was 7.4 months for patients treated with Cetuximab in 1st line, 7.5 in 2nd line and 5.3 in 3rd line. Survival did not correlate significantly with any of the immunohistochemically assessed parameters. TTP correlated significantly with pAkt overexpression for patients treated in 3rd line (p=0.0065). The CR was seen in the only patient with EGFR amplification.The presence of skin toxicity did not correlate with response to therapy. Conclusions: Overexpression of pAkt may correlate with response to Cetuximab in colorectal cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Epoetin alfa in platinum-treated ovarian cancer patients: results of a multinational, multicentre, randomised trial

This multicentre, open-label, controlled clinical trial assessed the effects of epoetin alfa treatment on haematologic and quality of life (QOL) parameters in 182 anaemic (Hb⩽12 g dl⁻¹) ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum chemotherapy. Patients were randomised 2 : 1 to receive epoetin alfa 10 000–20 000 IU three times weekly plus best standard treatment (BST) or BST only. Main study end points were changes from baseline in haemoglobin (Hb) level, transfusion requirements, and QOL. For the epoetin alfa group, mean Hb increased by 1.8 g dl⁻¹ by weeks 4–6 and was significantly increased from baseline through study end (P<0.001). The mean change in Hb from baseline was significantly (P<0.001) greater for epoetin alfa than BST patients at all postbaseline evaluations. Significantly fewer epoetin alfa than BST patients required transfusion(s) after the first 4 weeks of treatment (7.9 vs 30.5%; P<0.001). Also, significant (P⩽0.04) differences favouring the epoetin alfa group over the BST group were found for all three median CLAS scores (Energy Level, Ability to Do Daily Activities, Overall QOL) and the median average CLAS score during chemotherapy. These findings support use of epoetin alfa to increase Hb levels, reduce transfusion use, and improve QOL in anaemic ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum chemotherapy.