Boosting Vaccine Response in Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease Patients With Inadequate Seroconversion: An Analysis of the Immunogenicity of Vector-Based and Inactivated Vaccines

BACKGROUND

An additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine is being offered to vaccinated people, especially those immunocompromised. The most widely available vaccines in India are the adenoviral vector-based AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) and the heat-inactivated (BBV152). This study investigated the efficacy of both vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD).

OBJECTIVES

 To compare final anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, neutralization of pseudovirions by these antibodies, and T cell responses between patients of AIRD who had received the third dose of AZD1222 and BBV152 vaccines.

METHODS

Patients with stable AIRD who had completed two doses of COVID-19 vaccination but had a suboptimal response (anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody<212) were randomized (1:1) to receive either AZD1222 or BBV152 as a booster dose. Patients with previous hybrid immunity or those who developed COVID-19 during the trial were excluded. Antibody titers, neutralization of Wuhan and Omicron pseudovirions, and interferon release by T cells (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot)) in response to the Spike antigen were measured four weeks after this booster dose.

RESULTS

146 were screened, 91 were randomized, and 67 were analyzed per protocol. The third dose improved antibody titers (p<0.001), neutralization of the Wuhan strain (p<0.001), and T cell interferon release (p<0.001) but not neutralization of the Omicron strain (p=0.24). Antibody titers were higher (p<0.005) after ADZ1222 boost (2,414 IU (interquartile range (IQR): 330-10,315)) than BBV1222 (347.7 IU (0.4-973)). Neutralization of the Wuhan stain was better (AZD1222: 76.6%(23.0-95.45) versus BBV152 (32.7% (0-78.9), p=0.03 by ANCOVA). Neutralization of Omicron (0 (0-28.4) vs 0 (0-4.8)) and T cell interferon release (57.0 IU (23.5-95) vs 50.5 IU (13.2-139)) were similar.

CONCLUSION

The third dose improved all parameters of immunogenicity in AIRD patients with previous inadequate responses except Omicron neutralization. The vector-based vaccine exhibits notable efficacy, particularly in antibody titers and neutralizing the Wuhan strain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CTRI/2021/12/038928.

Exploratory clinical subgroup clustering in systemic sclerosis: Results from the Indian Progressive Systemic Sclerosis Registry

Objective

To conduct an exploratory cluster analysis of systemic sclerosis patients from the baseline data of the Indian systemic sclerosis registry.

Methods

Patients satisfying American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis were included. The clusters formed using clinical and immunological parameters were compared.

Results

Of the 564 systemic sclerosis registry participants, 404 patients were included. We derived four clusters of which three were anti-topoisomerase I predominant and one was anti-centromere antibody 2 dominant. Cluster 1 (n-82 (20.3%)) had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with the most severe skin disease, anti-topoisomerase I positivity, males, younger age of onset and high prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 2 (n-141 (34.9%)) was also diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-topoisomerase I predominant but with less severe skin phenotype than cluster 1 and a lesser prevalence of musculoskeletal, vasculopathic and gastrointestinal features. Cluster 3 (n-119 (29.5%)) had limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with anti-topoisomerase I positivity along with other antibodies. The proximal muscle weakness was higher and digital pitting scars were lower, while other organ involvement was similar between clusters 2 and 3. Cluster 4 (n-62 (15.30%)) was the least severe group with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and anti-centromere antibody predominance. Age of onset was higher with low musculoskeletal disease and a higher presence of upper gastrointestinal features. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease was similar in the three anti-topoisomerase I predominant clusters.

Conclusion

With exploratory cluster analysis, we confirmed the possibility of subclassification of systemic sclerosis along a spectrum based on clinical and immunological characteristics. We also corroborated the presence of anti-topoisomerase I in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis and the association of interstitial lung disease with anti-topoisomerase I.

Efficacy and safety of curcumin in maintaining remission during disease-modifying antirheumatic drug withdrawal in rheumatoid arthritis at 52 weeks: a phase III double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

Curcumin has anti-inflammatory properties but current evidence is limited to advocate its use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We explored whether curcumin could maintain remission in patients with RA while tapering conventional synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (csDMARD). In this patient-and investigator-blinded trial, adults with RA in sustained remission for more than six months were randomized to oral curcumin (1 g) with piperine (5 mg) twice daily or matching placebo. Patients who had received biological DMARDs or curcumin supplements in the last 6 months were excluded. csDMARD were tapered and stopped sequentially as per a fixed protocol. The primary outcome was flare-free survival at 52 weeks. The secondary outcomes were flare rate, correlation of serum curcuminoid levels with flares and safety. 200 patients (100 per arm) entered the trial with comparable baseline characteristics. Per protocol analysis included 92 and 93 participants in the curcumin and the placebo group, respectively. Flare-free survival at week 52 was similar between both groups (60% versus 64%; p = 0.76). The median time to flare was similar [Curcumin: 219 days (IQR: 123) versus placebo: 214 days (95.8); p = 0.067]. Cox proportionate regression modelling showed that the flare-free survival was independent of serum curcuminoid levels [adjusted HR = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.0)]. The model showed that flare-free survival was not associated with age, gender, seropositivity, or csDMARD used at baseline. No serious adverse effects were noted. Curcumin did not impact the flare-free survival in patients with RA in remission during the tapering of csDMARDs despite achieving adequate serum levels.Trial registration: CTRI/2018/04/013279.

Correlates of breakthrough Omicron (B.1.1.529) infections in a prospective cohort of vaccinated patients with rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

Data on the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the durability of protection against the prevalent Omicron variant are scarce, especially in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). Hence, we prospectively studied Omicron breakthrough infections in patients with AIRDs and attempted to isolate associated risk factors.

METHODS

Patients with AIRDs who had completed primary vaccination with either AZD1222 or BBV152 vaccines were included and prospectively followed up from January 2022 onwards for the development of breakthrough Omicron infections. The time interval from the last event [2nd dose of vaccination (V) or past COVID-19 infection (I) whichever was later] to Omicron infection was recorded. Patients were divided based on the events and their order of occurrence into V + V, V + I, I + V, V + I + V, and V + V + I groups. The incidence of breakthrough infections and their predictors were studied with a focus on the vaccine type and hybrid (H) immunity (vaccinated individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection).

RESULTS

We included 907 patients with AIRDs (53.5 ± 11.7 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:5.1), and the majority of patients had received AZD1222 (755, 83.2%). Breakthrough infections were observed in 158 of 907(17.4%) of which 97 (10.4%) were confirmed by RT-PCR. Breakthrough infections were significantly greater in the V versus the H group (15.7% and 3.5%, log-rank test, p =  < 0.01). Among the hybrid group, the order of infection and vaccination had no bearing on the risk of breakthrough infections. On multivariate analysis, breakthrough infections were significantly lesser in the H versus the V group [HR: 0.2(0.1-0.4); p = 0.01].

CONCLUSION

The risk of breakthrough Omicron infections in fully vaccinated patients with AIRDs was 17.4% with a significantly lower risk in patients with hybrid immunity.

Delay in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: reasons and trends over a decade

INTRODUCTION

Delay in diagnosis and treatment initiation often lead to poorer outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Most of the data on delay in diagnosis and management are from western population with no data from India. Additionally, with improved health care services, whether the delay has changed over years is not known. In this longitudinal observational study, we investigated delay to diagnosis and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) initiation over past 9 years.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years having RA fulfilling 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria were enrolled from January to June in years 2012, 2017 and 2021. Diagnoses received before presenting to clinic, socioeconomic status, educational level and other demographic variables were recorded.

RESULTS

Each year, 323 patients (mean age 49.5-52.01 years) were enrolled. There was a significant reduction in delay in diagnosis from a median (IQR) of 36 (12-84, range 1-288) months in 2012 to 12 (4-36, range 1-180) months in 2017 and 10 (5-24, range 1-120) months) in 2021 (p < 0.0001). A significant improvement in time to initiating DMARDs from 2012 [48 (24-96) months] to 2017 [12 (6-36) months] (p < 0.0001) and from 2017 to 2021 [12 (5-24) months] (p = 0.03) was seen. Higher education, more patients opting for treatment from rheumatologists, and urbanisation contributed significantly to improvement in delay. There was no impact of age or gender on delay.

CONCLUSION

Delay in diagnosis has improved significantly between 2012 and 2021. However, delay still remains long as most patients miss the 3-month therapeutic window. Future work focussing on reasons for delays in the patient pathway could help improve consultation pathways in India.

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis: an expert group consensus statement

This expert group consensus statement emphasises the need for standardising the definition of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), with an accurate initial diagnosis being of paramount importance in ensuring appropriate initial management. Equally, case-by-case decisions on monitoring and management are essential, given the varying presentations of F-ILDs and the varying rates of progression. The value of diagnostic tests in risk stratification at presentation and, separately, the importance of a logical monitoring strategy, tailored to manage the risk of progression, are also stressed. The term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) exactly describes the entity that clinicians often face in practice. The importance of using antifibrotic therapy early in PPF (once initial management has failed to prevent progression) is increasingly supported by evidence. Artificial intelligence software for high-resolution computed tomography analysis, although an exciting tool for the future, awaits validation. Guidance is provided on pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen and the use of non-invasive ventilation focused specifically on the needs of ILD patients with progressive disease. PPF should be differentiated from acute deterioration due to drug-induced lung toxicity or other forms of acute exacerbations. Referral criteria for a lung transplant are discussed and applied to patient needs in severe diseases where transplantation is not realistic, either due to access limitations or transplantation contraindications. In conclusion, expert group consensus guidance is provided on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of F-ILDs with specific focus on the recognition of PPF and the management of pulmonary fibrosis progressing despite initial management.

Effects of the second dose of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases with hybrid immunity

Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases with a previous infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus have exaggerated responses to a single dose of COVID-19 vaccination as compared to fully vaccinated infection naive patients. The second dose is currently recommended at an extended gap after the infection, but the information available regarding response to the second dose in this subgroup is limited. Patients with AIRDs previously infected with COVID-19, who have received at least one dose of AZD1222/ChAdOx1 (n = 200) were included and stratified based on vaccine doses (V), and infection (I) into I + V, I + V + V, V + I, V + V + I. Anti-RBD (receptor binding domain) antibodies were compared across the four groups. In 49 patients of the I + V + V group (AZD12222), paired sera were compared for antibody levels and neutralization after each vaccine dose. Thirty patients with hybrid immunity after BBV152 and 25 with complete vaccination without infection were included as controls. The highest anti-RBD antibody levels were observed in the V + V + I group (18,219 ± 7702 IU/ml) with statistically similar titers in the I + V + V (10,392 ± 8514 IU/ml) and the I + V (8801 ± 8122 IU/ml). This was confirmed in the 49 paired samples that paradoxically showed a lowering of antibody titers after the second dose [9626 (IQR: 4575-18,785)-5781 (2484-11,906); p < 0.001]. Neutralization of the Delta variant was unaffected but Omicron neutralization was significantly reduced after the second dose [45.7 (5.3-86.53)-35% (7.3-70.9); p = 0.028]. Ancillary analyses showed that only the hybrid immune sera could neutralize the Omicron variant and AZD1222 hybrids performed better than BBV152 hybrids. The second dose of AZD1222 did not boost antibody titers in patients with RD who had COVID-19 previously. In the analysis of paired sera, the second dose led to a statistically significant reduction in antibody titers and also reduced neutralization of the Omicron variant.

Risk factors associated with COVID-19 in systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a longitudinal prospective cohort

INTRODUCTION

Patients with SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus) have a higher risk of infection due to dysregulated immune system as well as long-term use of immunosuppressants (IS). This could influence the risk of COVID-19 and its outcome.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal prospective study across 15 rheumatology centres during the first wave of the pandemic to understand the risk factors contributing to COVID-19 in SLE patients. During the 6 months follow-up, those who tested positive for COVID-19, their clinical course and outcome information were recorded.

RESULTS

Through the study period (April-December 2020), 36/1379 lupus patients (2.9%) developed COVID-19. On analysing the COVID-19 positive versus negative cohort during the study period, male gender (adjusted RR 3.72, 95% C.I. 1.85,7.51) and diabetes (adjusted RR 2.94, 95% C.I. 1.28, 6.79) emerged as the strongest risk factors for COVID-19, in the adjusted analysis. There was no significant influence of organ involvement, hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoid dosage (prednisolone< 7.5 mg or ≥ 7.5 mg/day) or IS on the risk of COVID-19. There was only one death (1/36) among the lupus patients due to COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

Traditional risk factors rather than lupus disease process or IS influenced the risk of COVID-19 in our cohort.

Withholding methotrexate after vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov19 in patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis in India (MIVAC I and II): results of two, parallel, assessor-masked, randomised controlled trials

Background

There is a necessity for an optimal COVID-19 vaccination strategy for vulnerable population groups, including people with autoimmune inflammatory arthritis on immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, which inhibit vaccine-induced immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Thus, we aimed to assess the effects of withholding methotrexate for 2 weeks after each dose of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca) vaccine (MIVAC I) or only after the second dose of vaccine (MIVAC II) compared with continuation of methotrexate, in terms of post-vaccination antibody titres and disease flare rates.

Methods

MIVAC I and II were two parallel, independent, assessor-masked, randomised trials. The trials were done at a single centre (Dr Shenoy's Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatism Excellence; Kochi, India) in people with either rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis with stable disease activity, who had been on a fixed dose of methotrexate for the preceding 6 weeks. Those with previous COVID-19 or who were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies were excluded from the trials. People on high-dose corticosteroids and rituximab were also excluded, whereas other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were allowed. In MIVAC I, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to stop methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks after each vaccine dose or to continue methotrexate treatment. In MIVAC II, participants who had continued methotrexate during the first dose of vaccine were randomly assigned (1:1) to withhold methotrexate for 2 weeks after the second dose of vaccine or to continue to take methotrexate. The treating physician was masked to the group assignments. The primary outcome for both MIVAC I and MIVAC II was the titre (absolute value) of anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody measured 4 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. All analyses were done per protocol. The trials were registered with the Clinical Trials Registry- India, number CTRI/2021/07/034639 (MIVAC I) and CTRI/2021/07/035307 (MIVAC II).

Findings

Between July 6 and Dec 15, 2021, participants were recruited to the trials. In MIVAC I, 250 participants were randomly assigned and 158 completed the study as per the protocol (80 in the methotrexate hold group and 78 in the control group; 148 [94%] were women and 10 [6%] were men). The median post-vaccination antibody titres in the methotrexate hold group were significantly higher compared with the control group (2484·0 IU/mL, IQR 1050·0–4388·8 vs 1147·5 IU/mL, 433·5–2360·3; p=0·0014). In MIVAC II, 178 participants were randomly assigned and 157 completed the study per protocol (76 in the methotrexate hold group and 81 in the control group; 135 [86%] were women and 22 [14%] were men). The methotrexate hold group had higher post-vaccination antibody titres compared with the control group (2553·5 IU/ml, IQR 1792·5–4823·8 vs 990·5, 356·1–2252·5; p<0·0001). There were no reports of any serious adverse events during the trial period.

Interpretation

Withholding methotrexate after both ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine doses and after only the second dose led to higher anti-RBD antibody titres compared with continuation of methotrexate. However, withholding methotrexate only after the second vaccine dose resulted in a similar humoral response to holding methotrexate after both vaccine doses, without an increased risk of arthritis flares. Hence, interruption of methotrexate during the second dose of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine appears to be a safe and effective strategy to improve the antibody response in patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis.

Funding

Indian Rheumatology Association.

Burden of osteoarthritis in India and its states, 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of disease study 2019

OBJECTIVE

To describe the burden of osteoarthritis (OA) in India from 1990 to 2019.

DESIGN

Data from Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 were used. The burden of OA -knee OA, hip OA, hand OA, and other OA- was estimated for India and its states from 1990 to 2019 through a systematic analysis of prevalence, incidence, years lived with disability (YLD), and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) using methods reported in GBD 2019 study.

RESULT

Around 23.46 million individuals in India had OA in 1990; this increased to 62.35 million in 2019. The age-standardised prevalence of OA increased from 4,895 (95% uncertainty interval (UI):4,420-5,447) in 1990-5313 (95%UI:4,799-5,898) in 2019, per 100,000 persons. Similarly, DALYs due to OA increased from 0.79 million (95%UI:0.40-1.55) to 2.12 million (95%UI:1.07-4.23); while age-standardised DALYs increased from 164 (95%UI:83-325) to 180 (95%UI:91-361) per 100,000 persons from 1990 to 2019. OA was the 20^th most common cause of YLDs in India in 2019, accounting for 1.48% (95%UI:0.88-2.78) of all YLDs; increasing from 23rd most common cause in 1990 (1.25%(95%UI:0.74-2.34)). Knee OA was the most common form of OA, followed by hand OA. The prevalence, incidence, and DALYs for OA and knee OA were consistently higher in females than males.

CONCLUSION

The burden and impact of OA in India are substantial and is increasing. Adopting suitable control and preventive community measures to reduce modifiable risk factors (obesity, injuries, occupational stress) are needed to reduce the current and future burden of OA in India.

A prospective longitudinal study evaluating the influence of immunosuppressives and other factors on COVID-19 in autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Background

We conducted this study to identify the influence of prolonged use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressants (IS) on occurrence and outcome of COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs).

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional longitudinal study across 15 specialist rheumatology centers. Consecutive AIRD patients on treatment with immunosuppressants were recruited and followed up longitudinally to assess parameters contributing to development of COVID-19 and its outcome.

Results

COVID-19 occurred in 314 (3.45%) of 9212 AIRD patients during a median follow up of 177 (IQR 129, 219) days. Long term HCQ use had no major impact on the occurrence or the outcome of COVID-19. Glucocorticoids in moderate dose (7.5–20 mg/day) conferred higher risk (RR = 1.72) of infection. Among the IS, Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), Cyclophosphamide (CYC) and Rituximab (RTX) use was higher in patients with COVID 19. However, the conventional risk factors such as male sex (RR = 1.51), coexistent diabetes mellitus (RR = 1.64), pre-existing lung disease (RR = 2.01) and smoking (RR = 3.32) were the major contributing risk factors for COVID-19. Thirteen patients (4.14%) died, the strongest risk factor being pre-existing lung disease (RR = 6.36, p = 0.01). Incidence (17.5 vs 5.3 per 1 lakh (Karnataka) and 25.3 vs 7.9 per 1 lakh (Kerala)) and case fatality (4.1% vs 1.3% (Karnataka) and 4.3% vs 0.4% (Kerala)) rate of COVID-19 was significantly higher (p < 0.001) compared to the general population of the corresponding geographic region.

Conclusions

Immunosuppressants have a differential impact on the risk of COVID-19 occurrence in AIRD patients. Older age, males, smokers, hypertensive, diabetic and underlying lung disease contributed to higher risk. The incidence rate and the case fatality rate in AIRD patients is much higher than that in the general population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00264-0.

AB1582-PARE ASSIGNING A VALUE TO THE ‘PASS’ CONCEPT IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS: A SINGLE CENTER DATA

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a chronic, heterogeneous disease, needs long-term management. The concept of ‘Patient acceptable symptom state’ (PASS), evaluated with a dichotomized question on patients’ overall satisfaction with their current state of symptoms, represents the overall health state at which patients consider themselves well. Therapeutic compliance improves when the patient’s perspective of wellness is recognized while modifying treatment.

Objectives

To identify cut-off points for composite disease activity scores (DAS) and patient reported outcomes (PROs) that can reciprocate the PASS status of a patient with PsA.

Methods

A cross sectional study was conducted in patients with PsA attending a rheumatology centre in Kerala between March 2020 and Aug 2021. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, composite DAS [disease activity index for PsA (DAPSA), clinical (c) DAPSA] and PROs [PsA impact of disease (PsAID), patient pain visual analogue scale (VAS), patient global assessment (PGA), 12-item short-form survey (SF-12)] were compared in patients who responded ‘yes’ and ‘no’ to the ‘PASS’ question. Cut-off values for PASS in composite DAS and PROs were quantified using the Receiver Operator characteristic curve (ROC) curve. Regression models assessed the impact of different variables on the PASS status.

Results

From a total of 314 patients, 302 who fulfilled the inclusion, exclusion criteria were chosen for analysis. Of them, 171 (56.62%) patients were males. Mean age (S.D) and median disease duration (range) were found to be 50.50 ±11.77 years and 8 (4-14) years respectively. Among the study patients, 215 (70.46%) had acceptable PASS status. Median values for composite scores and patient reported characters in patients who accepted their symptoms and in patients who did not accept their symptoms, are represented in Table 1. Cut-off values for patient pain VAS, Pat GA, DAPSA, cDAPSA and PsAID, with the best tradeoffs between sensitivity and specificity, were found to be 17.5, 25, 10.95, 4.75 and 1.95, respectively (Figure 1A and B). Patients with active psoriatic lesions indicated by higher PASI score, presence of nail involvement, and moderate to high disease activity DAPSA value tended not to attain PASS (OR: 0.793; 95% CI: 0.67-0.93, OR: 0.438; 95% CI: 0.22-0.87, OR:0.168; 95% CI: 0.081-0.349).

Figure 1.Table 1.

Patient characteristics according to PASS status

parameters (median (IQR)PASS+vePASS –vep valueN=215N= 87DAPSA6.7 (3.54 -11.10)13 (7.15-18.85)0.00cDAPSA3 (1-7)11(6-15)0.00Dactylitis0 (0-0)0 (0-1)0.00HAQ0.25 (0-0.5)0.5 (0.13-0.88)0.00PsAID1 (0.5-1.9)2.55 (1.6 -4.3)0.00VAS (0-100)10 (0-20)40 (10-50)0.00Pat GA (0-10)1 (1-2)3 (2-5)0.00SF 12 PCS (physical component score)49.67 (42.99-54.31)40.77 (34.58)-50.12)0.00SF12MCS (mental component score)58.82 (53.96-60.73)47.16 (39.65-54.83)0.00Physician global assessment (1-10)1 (0-2)3 (2-4)0.00PASI0.30 (0-0.8)1 (0.2-4.9)

*P<0.05 is considered as significant

Conclusion

The determined cut-off values for PASS lay in the low disease activity range. A significant number of patients who did not attain PASS, received treatment intensification. Patients with increased PASI, presence of nail dystrophy, and moderate to high disease activity DAPSA value tended to not accept their state.

References

[1]Fei JZ, Perruccio AV, Ye JY, Gladman DD, Chandran V. The relationship between patient acceptable symptom state and disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2020 Jan 1;59(1):69-76.

[2]Lubrano E, Scriffignano S, Azuaga AB, Ramirez J, Cañete JD, Perrotta FM. Assessment of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in psoriatic arthritis: association with disease activity and quality of life indices. RMD open. 2020 Mar 1;6(1):e001170.

[3]Maksymowych WP, Richardson R, Mallon C, van der Heijde D, Boonen A. Evaluation and validation of the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. 2007 Feb 15;57(1):133-9.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

LB0003 WITHDRAWING METHOTREXATE AFTER BOTH VERSUS ONLY SECOND DOSE OF THE ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 VACCINE IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: TWO INDEPENDENT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS (MIVAC I AND II)

Background

Pausing methotrexate (MTX) for two to four weeks, improved immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), albeit a risk of disease flare (1). This guided the framing of guidelines on MTX withdrawal for COVID-19 vaccination (2). However, evidence for MTX withdrawal for COVID-19 vaccination is limited to observational studies only.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of holding MTX after each (MIVAC 1) and only after the second dose (MIVAC II) of the ChAdOx1 vaccine versus continuation of MTX in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

Two single centre, investigator-blinded, RCTs were conducted in patients with RA or Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on stable doses of MTX without prior COVID-19 (CTRI reg. no. MIVAC I: CTRI/2021/07/03463 & MIVAC II: CTRI/2021/07/035307). In MIVAC I, unvaccinated patients were randomised (1:1) to hold or continue MTX for two weeks after each dose of the vaccine. MIVAC II included patients who had continued MTX during the first dose of ChAdOx1 and were randomised (1:1) to hold or continue MTX for 2 weeks after the second vaccine dose. The primary outcome for both the trials was the anti-Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) antibody titres measured four weeks after the second vaccine dose (per protocol analysis). Secondary outcome was the flare rate, defined as an increase in disease activity scores (DAS28/cDAPSA) or physician intent to hike DMARDs.

Results

250 patients were randomized for MIVAC 1 and 178 for MIVAC II and after due exclusions, 158 and 157 were eligible for analysis respectively (Figure 1). In MIVAC I, median anti-RBD titres were significantly high in the MTX hold group [2484 (1050-4388) versus 1147(433-2360), p=0.001] but the flare rate was higher in the hold group [20 (25%) versus 6(8%) p=0.005] compared to continue group. In MIVAC II median anti-RBD titres were significantly high for the MTX hold group [2553 (1792-4823) versus 990 (356-2252), p=0.001] when compared to continue group but there was no difference in the flare rate between the groups [9(11.8%) and 4(7.9%), p=0.15] (Table 1). Since both were parallel studies in similar population, MTX hold arms across both the trials were compared for anti-RBD titres and flare. There was no difference in the anti-RBD titres [p=0.2] between the groups. In MIVAC I, 29(36.25%) patients had reported flare (19 in either first or second dose, 10 for both doses) when compared to MIVAC II where only 9(11.84%) patients had reported flare after the second dose (P <0.001).

Table 1.

Baseline demographics and key results

VariableMIVAC IMIVAC IIMTX HoldMTX ContinuePMTX HoldMTX ContinueP valueN=80N=78valueN=76N=81Age†48 (38-53.3)49 (39-59)0.1953 (42.3-59)53(50-62)0.14Female (%) ‡73 (91.3)75 (96.2)0.3365 (85.5)70 (86.4)>0.99RA (%) ‡69(86.3)69 (93.2)70 (85.6)80 (87.7)PsA (%) ‡11(13.8)6 (8.1)0.316 (7.9)1 (1.2)0.057DAS28†2.7 (2.4-3.2)2.6 (2-3.3)0.62.7(2.3-3.4)2.8 (2.1-3.5)0.78cDAPSA †2(3-4.5)2.5(1.3-3.8)0.463(2.8-3)30.15Prednisolone (%) ‡29 (36.3)23(31.1)0.424(31.6)26 (32.1)>0.99MTX mg/week†17.5 (10-25)15 (10-20)0.05715 (9.4-25)17.5(7.5-25)0.92Anti- RBD antibody titres post second dose (IU/mL) †2484 (1050-4388.8)1147.5 (433.5-2360.3)<0.0012553.5 (1792.5-4823.8)990.5 (356.1-2252.5)<0.001Flare (N%) ‡Post first dose20 (25)6 (8)0.005NANAPost second dose19 (23.8)10(13.3)0.19 (11.8)4 (7.9)0.15

All analysis as per protocol population.

†Median (interquartile range): Mann Whitney U test.

‡ N (%): Fisher Exact test

. Bolded if p<0.05.

Conclusion

Holding MTX after both the doses or only after the second dose of ChAdOx1 yields higher anti-RBD antibody titres as compared to continuing MTX. Comparing across the trials, holding MTX only after the second dose appears to be non-inferior to holding MTX after both doses of the vaccine with a lesser risk of flare.

References

[1]Park JK et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Feb; 39(2):375-379.

[2]Curtis JR, et al. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2021 Oct;73(10): e60-75.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments to all participating investigators, patients and their families

Disclosure of Interests

Anu Sreekanth: None declared, Teny Skaria: None declared, Sneha Joseph: None declared, Rashwith Umesh: None declared, Manju Mohanan: None declared, Aby Paul: None declared, Sakir Ahmed Speakers bureau: Sakir Ahmed had received honorarium as speaker from Pfizer, Dr Reddy’s, Cipla, and Novartis unrelated to this Comment, Pankti Mehta: None declared, Seena Oomen: None declared, Janet Benny: None declared, Justin George: None declared, Anagha Paulose: None declared, K Narayanan: None declared, Sanjana Joseph: None declared, Anuroopa Vijayan: None declared, Kaveri Nalianda: None declared, Padmanabha Shenoy: None declared

POS1425 THE BURDEN OF OSTEOARTHRITIS ACROSS THE STATES OF INDIA, 1990–2019: FINDINGS FROM THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE STUDY 2019

Background

Few studies have reported the burden of osteoarthritis (OA) in different parts of India. However, no study has reported the detailed estimates of incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) and its trends for OA (and its various sites) across the states of India over a long period of time.

Objectives

We aim to describe the state-wise prevalence, incidence, and YLDs for osteoarthritis (OA) in India from 1990 to 2019 according to age and sex.

Methods

Data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 were used. The burden of OA –including knee OA, hip OA, hand OA, and other OA– was estimated for India and its states from 1990 to 2019 through a systematic analysis of prevalence, incidence, and YLDs modelled data using the methods reported in the GBD 2019 Study. All estimates are presented as counts and age-standardised rates per 100,000 population, with uncertainty intervals (UIs).

Results

Around 23.46 million individuals in India had OA in 1990; this increased to 62.35 million in 2019. The age-standardised prevalence of OA increased from 4,895 (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 4,420–5,447) in 1990 to 5313 (95%UI: 4,799–5,898) in 2019, per 100,000. OA was the 20th most common cause of YLDs in India in 2019, accounting for 1·48% (95%UI: 0·88–2·78) of all YLDs; increasing from 23rd most common cause in 1990 (1·25% (95%UI: 0·74–2·34)). Knee OA was the most common form of OA, followed by hand OA. The prevalence, incidence, and YLDs for OA and knee OA were consistently higher in females than males. Uttar Pradesh (8.53 million (95%UI: 7.63–9.53), Maharashtra (6.37 million (95%UI: 5.75–7.06), and West Bengal (4.90 million (95%UI: 4.39–5.46) had the three highest levels of OA prevalence. Goa (5689 (95%UI: 5,125–6,282)), Rajasthan (5667 (95%UI: 5,097–6,305)), and Kerala (5658 (95%UI: 5,107–6,263)) had the highest age-standardised prevalence of OA in 2019, per 100,000 (Figure 1 A and B).

Conclusion

The burden and impact of OA in India are substantial and is increasing; however, it varied among states. Females were affected more commonly than males. Knee OA was the most prevalent site. With improvement in life expectancy and population ageing, greater increases are expected. Adopting suitable control and preventive community measures to reduce modifiable risk factors (such as obesity, injuries, occupational stress) are needed now to reduce the current and future burden of OA in India.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Postvaccination antibody titres predict protection against COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune diseases: survival analysis in a prospective cohort

INTRODUCTION

To assess the incidence and risk factors for breakthrough COVID-19 infection in a vaccinated cohort of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) and determine whether antibodies to receptor binding domain of spike protein (anti-RBD) serve as a reliable predictor of susceptibility to such infections.

METHODS

Patients with AIRDs who had completed two doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccines were included and anti-RBD antibodies were determined 4-6 weeks post the second vaccine dose and stratified into good responders (GR) (>212 IU), inadequate responders (IR) (0.8-212 IU) and non-responders (NR) (<0.8 IU). Patients who had completed a minimum of 8 weeks interval after the second dose of vaccine were followed up every 2 months to identify breakthrough infections. All sero converted patients who had contact with COVID-19 were also analysed for neutralising antibodies.

RESULTS

We studied 630 patients of AIRDs (mean age 55.2 (±11.6) years, male to female ratio of 1:5.2). The majority of patients had received AZD1222 (495, 78.6%) while the remaining received the BBV152 vaccine. The mean antibody titre was 854.1 (±951.9), and 380 (60.3%) were GR, 143 (22.7%) IR and 107 (16.9%) NR.Breakthrough infections occurred in 47 patients (7.4%) at a mean follow-up of 147.3 (±53.7) days and were proportionately highest in the NR group (19; 17.75%), followed by the IR group (13; 9.09%) and least in the GR group (15; 3.95%). On log-rank analysis, antibody response (p<0.00001), vaccine(p=0.003) and mycophenolate mofetil (p=0.007) were significant predictors of breakthrough infections. On multivariate Cox regression, only NR were significantly associated with breakthrough infections (HR: 3.6, 95% CI 1.58 to 8.0, p=0.002). In sero converted patients with contact with COVID-19, neutralisation levels were different between those who developed and did not develop an infection.

CONCLUSION

Breakthrough infections occurred in 7.4% of patients and were associated with seronegativity following vaccination. This provides a basis for exploring postvaccination antibody titres as a biomarker in patients with AIRD.

The emerging role of mycophenolate mofetil in interstitial lung diseases

INTRODUCTION

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), initially approved to prevent rejection in solid organ allograft, is now being increasingly used for other conditions. Over the last decade, MMF has emerged as a useful therapy for a variety of immune-mediated diseases.

AREAS COVERED

There has been a growing interest in the clinical use of MMF in the treatment of ILDs due to its versatile anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, anti-fibrotic and anti-proliferative properties. In this focussed review, we summarize the available literature using the Pubmed, Science Direct and EMBASE databases published until June 2021 on the efficacy and tolerability of MMF in various ILDs.

EXPERT OPINION

Other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and its broader category of progressive fibrosing ILD, there have been no drugs approved by relevant regulatory agencies for the treatment of the multiple other forms of ILD. Though results are limited, immunosuppressants such as MMF have shown promise as an effective and well-tolerated steroid-sparing agent, providing hope that the limited treatment armamentarium for ILDs can be expanded.

Safety of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and the BBV152 vaccines in 724 patients with rheumatic diseases: a post-vaccination cross-sectional survey

Patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal (RMD) diseases may be at higher risks for COVID-19 infection. Data on the safety of the adenoviral vector-borne ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and the heat-inactivated BBV152 Vaccines in this group are limited. 724 patients with RMD who had received at least one dose of either the ChAdOx1 or the BBV152 were audited to find out post-vaccination adverse effect (AE) or disease flares. The AE rates in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD) were compared with those with non-AIRD RMDs. The mean age of the cohort was 59.9 (± 10.43) years with a female (n = 581; 80.24%) majority. 523 (70.8%) had AIRD. The ChAdOx1 and the BBV152 vaccines were received by 624 (86.18%) and 77 (10.63%), respectively. 23 (3.17%) were unaware of which vaccine they had received. 238 (32.87%) of patients had at least one comorbidity. 436 (60.22%) participants [306 (59.64%) of those with AIRD and 130 (61.61%) with other RMDs] had at least one adverse effect (AE). Four patients reported flare of arthritis that resolved within 5 days. No patient had any severe AE or required hospitalization. All AEs were self-limiting. Both the ChAdOx1 and the BBV152 vaccines appear safe in RMDs. AEs do not differ between patients with AIRD or non-AIRD. This information can help negate vaccine hesitancy amongst all stakeholders.

POS0889 CO PRESCRIPTION OF ANTI-ACID THERAPY REDUCES THE BIO AVAILABILITY OF MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS PATIENTS

Background:

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective treatment option for systemic sclerosis (SSC). However, many patients require co administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or H2 receptor blockers (HRB) because of significant gastrointestinal manifestations in SSC. Co-treatment with PPI or HRB have shown to be associated with reduced drug exposure in post-transplant patients.1, 2 There is scarcity of data among patients with SSC. We evaluated the drug concentration of MMF over 12 hours of exposure and assessed the impact of ranitidine and PPI in twenty patients with SSC.

Objectives:

To assess the effect of esomeprazole or ranitidine on the bioavailability of MMF in SSC patients who are on a stable dose of MMF.

Methods:

Twenty SSC patients, who were on a stable dose of MMF (1.5-3 g) for the past 3 months were selected for the study after obtaining informed written consent. All patients were given either MMF (without PPI or HRB), MMF + esomeprazole, MMF + ranitidine for one month each. At the end of each month, EDTA plasma samples were collected at various time points including 0, 1/2, 1, 1½, 2, 2½, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 hours following drug administration to determine the 12-hour area under curve (AUC) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) levels. Estimation of MPA levels was carried out using reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Total gastrointestinal score was calculated at the end of each month using UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 scoring. To compare the mean AUC, linear mixed effect model was fit by considering treatment as the fixed effect and subject as the random effect. MMF was set as the reference treatment for the other three treatments and these were analysed together using Linear mixed effect model.

Results:

All patients were females with mean age of 45 years. Addition of either ranitidine or esomeprazole significantly reduced the mean AUC and C max of the MMF over 12-hour time period. On the other hand, PPI or HRB helped in reduction of the total GI score at the end of 1 month. Details of pharmacokinetics are depicted in the table 1.

Table 1.

Pharmacokinetics and GI score with MMF in combination with PPI / HRB

MMFMMF+ RMMF + EpAUCmean (95% CI)67.97 (62.73, 73.20)53.04 (44.80, 61.27)45.69 (41.10, 50.28)<0.001*T- MAXmean (95% CI)42.00 (33.60, 50.40)46.50 (32.48, 60.52)79.50 (58.99, 100.01)<0.001*C-MAXmean (95% CI)29.61(26.74, 32.48)15.14 (11.32, 18.97)12.62 (10.58, 14.66)<0.001*Mean GI scoremean (95% CI)0.28 (0.15,0.40)0.19 (0.09, 0.30)0.14 (0.06,0.23)0.009

AUC, area under curve Mycophenolic acid; C-MAX, maximum concentration of MPA in 12 hours following MMF; CI confidence interval;Mean GI score, UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium GIT 2.0 scoring; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MMF+E, mycophenolate mofetil + esomeprazole; MMF+R, mycophenolate mofetil+ ranitidine;

*p value < 0.05 considered as significant

Conclusion:

As co administration of PPI or HRB can significantly reduce the bioavailability of MMF in patients with systemic sclerosis. To avoid therapeutic failure of MMF drug level monitoring is essential when these agents re prescribed with MMF.

References:

[1]Schaier M, Scholl C, Scharpf D, Hug F, Bönisch-Schmidt S, Dikow R, et al. Proton pump inhibitors interfere with the immunosuppressive potency of mycophenolate mofetil. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2010;49:2061–7.

[2]Rissling O, Glander P, Hambach P, Mai M, Brakemeier S, Klonower D, et al. No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2015;80:1086–96.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Clinical and psychosocioeconomic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients of the Indian Progressive Systemic Sclerosis Registry (IPSSR)

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on access to health care among patients with scleroderma and to analyse the economic and psychosocial impacts and the infection prevention measures taken by them during the pandemic.

METHODS

A 25-item questionnaire designed to assess the components of the objectives was tele-administered between October 2020 and January 2021 to the patients enrolled in the Indian Progressive Systemic Sclerosis Registry.

RESULTS

Of the 428 patients in the registry, 336 took part in the study. A scheduled outpatient visit was missed by 310 (92.3%) patients, and 75 (22.3%) skipped prescription drugs. During the pandemic, 75 (22.3%) had a family member lose a job. Financial difficulties were reported by 155 (46.1%), with 116 (34.5%) patients having to spend an additional INR 4000 (2000-10 000) [USD 54.9 (27.0-137.4)] to continue treatment. Although 35 patients (10.4%) had at least one symptom suggestive of COVID-19, infection was confirmed in only 4. None of them needed hospitalization or had adverse outcomes. Worsening of scleroderma was seen in 133 (39.6%) individuals, with 15 (4.5%) requiring hospitalization. Most (96%) of the patients were aware of infection prevention measures, and 91 (27.1%) had taken unproven prophylactic medications.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with scleroderma in India have been affected during the pandemic owing to closure of hospital services, lack of transport, loss of jobs and the additional financial burden. Health-care providers should continue to educate patients to stay on their medications and encourage them to be vaccinated for COVID-19.

Low-dose rituximab protocol in rheumatoid arthritis-outcome and economic impact

OBJECTIVES

A significant proportion of RA patients, particularly those associated with poor prognostic factors, fail on conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). Although rituximab (RTX) has been effective in these patients, the cost of therapy makes it unaffordable, particularly in poor and developing countries. Numerous, albeit small, studies using lower doses have shown contradictory results. We aimed to analyse the effectiveness of a low-dose RTX protocol based on clinical outcomes in RA patients.

METHODS

Seropositive RA patients with moderate to high disease activity (DAS28-ESR > 3.2) despite combination cDMARDs, treated with RTX, were included in retrospective analysis. All patients were treated according to a predefined protocol, using 500 mg RTX with ongoing cDMARDs at baseline and repeat dosing at 6 weeks or beyond, on lack of moderate to good EULAR response. The B cell count was assessed at baseline, 2 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, 93% of 166 patients [mean (s.d.) age, 51.5 (11.96) years, 25 men and 141 women, with a disease duration of 10.4 (6.29) years] achieved moderate to good EULAR response. At 24 weeks, 90.8% of patients achieved moderate to good EULAR response, 19.8% achieved low disease activity and 29.5% achieved remission, with a mean change in DAS28-ESR from baseline of 2.9 (1.3). RTX failure and relapse were seen in 5.4% and 3.6%, respectively. The response was maintained for 12.3 (7.2) months with a mean RTX dose 521.1 (100.8) mg. Adverse events were seen in 9.6%. When compared with the standard dosing regimen with the originator molecule, a cost reduction of 90% was achieved.

CONCLUSION

A low-dose RTX regimen achieved reasonably good clinical outcomes at the end of 6 months, with a significantly lower cost.

Switching to teleconsultation for rheumatology in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: feasibility and patient response in India

The emergent COVID-19 pandemic dictates an urgent switch to teleconsultation. India has high patient to rheumatologist ratio, and patients have limited concepts about telemedicine. Thus, we attempted to find the feasibility and acceptance of patients in switching to teleconsultation. The CARE rheumatology clinic at Kerala, India, caters to average 170 (range: 140–240) patients per day. Patients with prefixed appointments had two-level screening for eligibility for teleconsultation. Those eligible were given the option for teleconsultation on the widely available WhatsApp app. Of those who completed teleconsultations, 100 were chosen at random to provide feedback. In the first 7 days, out of 1469 appointments, 975 were found eligible for teleconsultation. Of these, 723 (74%) opted for it. The average footfall in the clinic was reduced to 67 (range 29–117). The proportion of patients accepting teleconsultations increased with time. Amongst the 100 respondents, median satisfaction was 9 (IQR 8–10) and recommendation for continuing was 9.5 (IQR 8–10) on a 0–10 scale. Multivariate analysis showed the recommendation score was dependent on beliefs about social distancing, perceptions about clinical examination, and the satisfaction score of the first teleconsultation. Age, sex, availability of personal video conferencing app or of vehicles did not independently influence this score. Without teleconsultation facilities, three-fourths of the respondents would have stopped drugs or self-medicated. The switch was feasible and accepted by patients. It enabled quick reduction in the number of persons travelling to the centre. Not making the switch could have deprived approximately three-quarters of these patients of proper medical care.

Key Points • Patient to rheumatologist ratios in India is heavily skewed and awareness about telemedicine is limited. • Switch to telemedicine was feasible and allowed a decrease in the number of people attending the clinic. • Not switching could have lead to disruption of care or self-medication in a majority of patients.

In Vitro Evaluation of Substantivity, Staining Potential, and Biofilm Reduction of Guava Leaf Extract Mouth Rinse in Combination with its Anti-Inflammatory Effect on Human Gingival Epithelial Keratinocytes

This study aimed to assess the biofilm reduction, staining potential, and cytotoxicity of guava extract mouth rinse compared to chlorhexidine (CHX). Substantivity, staining, and antibiofilm potential were investigated by spectrophotometry, colony-forming units, and luminosity color meter, respectively. The cell viability assay was conducted using a colorimetric assay to determine nontoxic levels of guava (0.15%) and CHX in human gingival epithelial keratinocytes (HGEK-16). Cells were treated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS, 1μg/mL) and guava to assess inflammatory gene expression levels of interleukin-β1, tumor necrosis factor-α, and Prostaglandin E2. A scratch wound healing assay investigated the effects of guava on cell migration. The teeth coated in guava mouth rinse displayed 19.4% higher substantivity compared to CHX (0.2%), and the anti-biofilm reduction was observed with both guava and CHX mouth rinses (P < 0.05). The overall discoloration changes were higher with CHX and distilled water compared to guava. Also, guava significantly enhanced HGEK-16 cell viability (P < 0.05), and IL-β1, TNFα and PGE2 expression presented a 0.6-fold decrease when exposed to guava and LPS (P < 0.05). The present study showed that guava mouth rinse fulfilled the requirement for an effective and useful oral care product with desirable substantivity and anti-biofilm action. In addition, guava reduced the inflammation response in HGEK-16 and may be a potential oral rinse for oral anti-inflammatory therapies.

P64 Connecting the dots: towards patient-centric outcome-based RA management: a patient initiative

Background

A chronic illness like RA which can result in crippling, chronic pain and disability, needs a fourfold approach to address the wellbeing of the patient, namely physical medicine, suitable diet, mild to moderate exercise and mental/emotional wellbeing. This need for multipronged approach brings its own challenges in the current ecosystem of medical care in India. Adding to the fact that any treatment aimed at control/cure of RA can last for months and years makes the whole process tedious and frustrating at times.

The organisation Parihaar aims to address this challenge by providing continuous support to the patient in order to equip them to become an active partaker in their treatment, and also aims to bring relevant stakeholders together.

Methods

Parihaar addresses the gaps in current ecosystem in chronic autoimmune illness management with help from technology and the internet.

Results

Parihaar is a project that is underway. It is a patient initiative supported by a rheumatologist.

Conclusion

Parihaar is a small step that is addressing a large issue. It is complementary to the current healthcare ecosystem in India, and its success truly depends on adoption and usage.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rare case of atypical femoral fracture with blocked medullary canal associated with bisphosphonate therapy

Bisphosphonates are widely used for treatment of osteoporosis and its use is increasing in geriatric population. Atypical femoral fractures are associated with bisphosphonate therapy. We report an unusual case of femoral shaft fracture following bisphosphonate therapy where the femoral canal of the proximal and distal fracture fragments was blocked and its management.

Identification of prolargin expression in articular cartilage and its significance in rheumatoid arthritis pathology

Qualitative 2D gel-electrophoresis (2DE) protein profiling for osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is challenging because of selective protein loss due to discrepancies in protein precipitation methodologies. Thus, we aimed at developing qualitative protein representation from OA/RA articular cartilage without protein precipitation towards identification of clinically relevant proteins. Chondroitinase digested human articular cartilages from RA patients were subjected to protein extraction using guanidinium hydrochloride (GuHCl) or 8 M urea with 10 or 2% ASB-14-4 or 0.45 M urea with 2% ASB-14-4 with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). The GuHCl extract is further protein precipitated with acetone or ammonium acetate-methanol or centricon-fractionated using 100 kDa cut filters and protein precipitated using ethanol. Processed extracts were subjected to 2DE to identify protein profiles. Poor proteins representations were observed in 2D gels with protein precipitated samples compared to qualitative protein representations seen in 2D gels of 0.45 M urea and 2%ASB-14-4 extraction procedure reproducibly. The strategy circumventing protein precipitation generated qualitative 2D gels. RA vs OA gel comparison showed elevated prolargin levels in RA with biglycan levels remaining unaltered. Up regulation of prolargin in RA suggests the likelihood of an adaptive mechanism to control the increased osteoclastogenesis in RA and may have therapeutic value in controlling the disease.

A Rare Cause of Portal Hypertension: Behcet's Disease and Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia of the Liver

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is a rare liver condition in which widespread benign transformation of the hepatic parenchyma into small regenerative nodules occur, leading to development of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Conditions associated with NRH include rheumatologic, hematological, autoimmune, infectious, neoplastic, or drug-related etiology. Accurate diagnosis is made on liver biopsy, showing diffuse micronodular transformation in the absence of fibrosis. Here, we present the second case in world literature of a middle-aged man presenting with recent onset sleep reversal and memory loss with darkening of skin for four years associated with systemic manifestations, in whom porto-systemic shunt syndrome due to NRH secondary to Behcet’s disease was eventually diagnosed.

Arthropathy in dermatology: A comprehensive review

Dermatology and rheumatology are two specialties that deal with significant overlap. In this context, it is important that the dermatologists acquaint themselves with conditions presenting with arthropathy. As the first step, it is essential to know whether the origin of musculoskeletal symptom is articular or extra-articular; inflammatory or noninflammatory; acute or chronic; oligo- or poly-articular. This will help in narrowing down the differential diagnoses as well as in better correlation with the cutaneous symptoms. In this review, we discuss the skin and articular manifestations of common inflammatory and noninflammatory arthropathies including rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, connective tissue disorders, vasculitis, crystal arthropathies, infective arthritis, arthritis associated with degenerative, endocrine and metabolic conditions, etc. We have also added a section on the common cutaneous features associated with the treatment of rheumatologic diseases. A basic understanding of the joint pathologies and associated skin changes will help a long way in the better management of these conditions.

Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome presenting as acute respiratory distress and cor pulmonale

We describe a 7-year-old boy with staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome who presented with acute respiratory distress and cor pulmonale. We wish to highlight this unusual presentation as the diagnosis of toxic shock syndrome depends chiefly on a high degree of clinical suspicion. Early diagnosis and prompt institution of appropriate therapy will significantly reduce morbidity and mortality.

Bortezomib plus modified R-CHOP as initial therapy for indolent B-cell lymphomas: Phase I results

8577

Background: Adding rituximab (R) to chemotherapy improves survival for patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL) and other indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), but not all pts respond. Bortezomib (B) + RCHOP has a high complete response (CR) rate, but higher doses of B with standard vincristine produced severe neuropathy. We developed a phase I/II trial to test if adding B to RCHOP with modified vincristine dosing can be well-tolerated and yield a high CR rate. Methods: Untreated pts with indolent NHL and indications for treatment based on GELF criteria or FLIPI ≥3 received R 375mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2, vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (capped at 1.5mg) on day 1, B 1.0- 1.6mg/m2 days 1 and 8, and prednisone 100mg days 1–5 for 6–8 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the regimen at which <30% grade ≥3 non-hematological or grade ≥4 hematological toxicity (>14 days) occurs. Dose escalation used the Escalation with Overdose Control Bayesian method with upper bound (θ=0.3). This facilitated MTD finding with fewer pts given prior data on B+RCHOP. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Neurotoxicity (11-item; 4 point scale), EMG, nerve conduction velocity and epidermal nerve fiber density measures were taken at baseline and after cycle 4. Results: 11 pts with FL (n=6) or other indolent NHL enrolled in phase I. Median age was 59 years (range 29–69). 6 pts (55%) had stage IV disease; 8 (64%) had FLIPI ≥2. Pts received RCHOP + B at 1.0 mg/m2 (n=1), 1.3 mg/m2 (n= 6) or 1.6 mg/m2 (n= 4) and together completed 67 cycles. Treatment was well tolerated. Neuropathy occurred in 4 pts (36%), with 2 grade 1, 1 grade 2 and 1 grade 3 toxicity ( Table ). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 4 pts (36%), but none >14 days. Overall response rate was 100% with 5/8 finished pts (63%) achieving CR. 3 continue on treatment. Mean FACT Neurotoxicity after cycle 4 remained < 1 for all items. Conclusions: Adding bortezomib to RCHOP produces limited toxicity when vincristine is capped at 1.5 mg. Phase II will explore the efficacy of this regimen.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]