Divarasib plus cetuximab in KRAS G12C-positive colorectal cancer: a phase 1b trial

KRAS G12C mutation is prevalent in ~4% of colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Divarasib, a KRAS G12C inhibitor, has shown modest activity as a single agent in KRAS G12C-positive CRC at 400 mg. Epidermal growth factor receptor has been recognized as a major upstream activator of RAS-MAPK signaling, a proposed key mechanism of resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition in CRC. Here, we report on divarasib plus cetuximab (epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor) in patients with KRAS G12C-positive CRC (n = 29) from arm C of an ongoing phase 1b trial. The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Secondary objectives included preliminary antitumor activity. The safety profile of this combination was consistent with those of single-agent divarasib and cetuximab. Treatment-related adverse events led to divarasib dose reductions in four patients (13.8%); there were no treatment withdrawals. The objective response rate was 62.5% (95% confidence interval: 40.6%, 81.2%) in KRAS G12C inhibitor-naive patients (n = 24). The median duration of response was 6.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval: 5.5, 12.3). As an exploratory objective, we observed a decline in KRAS G12C variant allele frequency associated with response and identified acquired genomic alterations at disease progression that may be associated with resistance. The manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity of divarasib plus cetuximab support the further investigation of this combination in KRAS G12C-positive CRC.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04449874.

The impact of COVID-19 on cancer care and oncology clinical research: an experts' perspective

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic promises to have lasting impacts on cancer clinical trials that could lead to faster patient access to new treatments. In this article, an international panel of oncology experts discusses the lasting impacts of the pandemic on oncology clinical trials and proposes solutions for clinical trial stakeholders, with the support of recent data on worldwide clinical trials collected by IQVIA. These lasting impacts and proposed solutions encompass three topic areas. Firstly, acceleration and implementation of new operational approaches to oncology trials with patient-centric, fully decentralized virtual approaches that include remote assessments via telemedicine and remote devices. Geographical differences in the uptake of remote technology, including telemedicine, are discussed in the article, focusing on the impact of the local adoption of new operational approaches. Secondly, innovative clinical trials. The pandemic has highlighted the need for new trial designs that accelerate research and limit risks and burden for patients while driving optimization of clinical trial objectives and endpoints, while testing is being minimized. Areas of considerations for clinical trial stakeholders are discussed in detail. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the underrepresentation of minority groups in clinical trials; the approach for oncology clinical trials to improve generalizability of efficacy and outcomes data is discussed. Thirdly, a new problem-focused collaborative framework between oncology trial stakeholders, including decision makers, to leverage and further accelerate the innovative approaches in clinical research developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This could shorten timelines for patient access to new treatments by addressing the cultural and technological barriers to adopting new operational approaches and innovative clinical trials. The role of the different stakeholders is described, with the aim of making COVID-19 a catalyst for positive change in oncology clinical research and eventually in cancer care.

Abstract P5-04-06: Reprogramming the suppressive tumor microenvironment of breast cancer

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide benefit for immunogenic cancers that naturally attract T cell infiltration, but have limited benefit for patients with tumors that lack natural T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) including many breast cancers. Suboptimal and inconsistent immune responsiveness in many cancers is likely the result of a lack of tumor antigen expression and/or recognition together with multiple suppressive signals within the TME that provide a formidable barrier to T cell infiltration. Emerging data suggest that these factors can be overcome by combining epigenetic modulation that reprograms myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and upregulate T cell-attracting signals within the TME, with ICIs. Our paralleled preclinical and clinical trial investigates the mechanisms and efficacy of the epigenetic modulator, entinostat (ENT) to reprogram the immune suppressive cells within the TME.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02453620) of entinostat combined with nivolumab +/- ipilimumab in patients with advanced cancers including hormone-receptor positive or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Mandatory tumor samples are being obtained pre-treatment, post-treatment with 2 weeks of entinostat, and 8 weeks post combination therapy with ICIs. We used immunohistochemical (IHC) for CD8 and FoxP3 to determine a ratio representative of immune infiltration in response to therapy. Preclinical studies utilize mouse models of breast cancer (NeuN and 4T1) and mirror the treatment scheme used in the clinical trial. We employed multiparameter flow cytometry, single cell RNA sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing of tumor specimens and patient samples to specifically interrogate the role of ENT in modulating STAT3 as a master regulator of downstream inflammatory pathways.

Results: With regard to the clinical trial, out of 35 patients enrolled, 11 were diagnosed with breast cancer. We observed 4 partial responses, 2 responses in patients with breast cancer, with an ORR of 12%. We have almost completed accrual of our expansion cohort of 15 patients with advanced HER2 negative breast cancer. The primary outcomes of the clinical trial will be reported elsewhere, here we are focusing on important correlative findings which suggest a combination of ENT with ICIs alters CD8/FoxP3 ratios in certain patients. Bulk-RNA sequencing or patient samples is underway. Preliminary data from animal models obtained using scRNA-seq has begun to elucidate altered MDSC signaling pathways, and to identify gene expression changes in immune, stromal, and tumor cells following treatment with ENT. These data are also expected to identify new targets for ICI sensitization.

Conclusions: Preliminary results with IHC staining suggests increased immune infiltration with combination therapy. Sequencing analysis will likely provide deeper insight into mechanisms driving response. The mechanisms of response to ICIs in patients with breast cancer have yet to be elucidated. These studies will provide the necessary scientific evidence to uncover mechanisms behind the transformation of the immunosuppressive TME and provide new targets that could improve clinical response to ICIs to maximize patient survival. The core biological themes explored will likely have a broad impact in the field of breast cancer and affect the paradigm of therapies available to patients in the clinic. These findings will help determine how treatment with ICIs will be successful to obtain durable responses for breast cancer patients.

Citation Format: Evanthia T Roussos Torres, Luciane Tsukamoto Kagohara, Emily Davis, Christine Rafie, Brian Christmas, Qingfeng Zhu, Chenguang Wang, David Lim, Robert Anders, Elana Fertig, Vincent Chung, Patricia Lorusso, Adam Brufsky, Elizabeth M Jaffee, Vered Stearns, Roisin Connolly. Reprogramming the suppressive tumor microenvironment of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-06.

Cephalometric changes after headgear anchored to the deciduous second molars in the early mixed dentition

AIM

The present study aimed to evaluate the cephalometric effects of a headgear anchored to the deciduous second molars in the early mixed dentition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design: The study followed a retrospective longitudinal design and enrolled 31 consecutive patients (17 females and 14 males) treated with high pull (HP) headgear anchored to the deciduous second molars, average age 8y 5m± 5m at pre-treatment time (T0) and 9y 8m± 6m at post-treatment time (T1). All the patients wore the headgear for approximately 8-10 hours at night, with a force of 250 g per side. The active phase of treatment ended once patients obtained a distal step on permanent molars of at least 2 mm. Lateral cephalograms at T0 and T1 were taken; 10 angular measurements were chosen as variables of the study. The paired sample t-test was employed to assess the significance of the differences of each variable between T0 and T1.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In this group of Class II patients, HP headgear anchored to the deciduous second molars in the early mixed dentition produced: significant reduction of SNA angle, significant increase of SN/NL angle with no significant change in SN/ML angle, significant labial flaring of upper incisors. As clinically evaluated, the correction of the Class II occlusal relationship and the anterior crowding of maxillary arch were also accomplished.

Evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients

AIM

The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between masseter size, maxillary intermolar width and craniofacial vertical skeletal pattern.

STUDY DESIGN

The study followed a prospective longitudinal design and enrolled 61 subjects (30 males and 31 females), 9-14 years of age (mean age 11.5) at 2-3 CVM stage. The participants were divided into three groups based on their vertical skeletal pattern which was estimated using the Frankfurt-mandibular plane angle: low-angle group (L-A), normal-angle group (N-A), high-angle group (H-A). An additional gender-based distinction was made. Maxillary intermolar width was measured on the maxillary cast of each patient by means of an electronic caliper; masseter volume was estimated by using magnetic resonance (MR) and masseter thickness was measured by means of ultrasonography (US). The US registrations were performed during the relaxation state (RS) and the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the muscle. The indipendent samples T- test was used for sex comparisons; the analysis of variance test (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the differences between the three groups in males and females, and the Pearson r correlation coefficient was employed to assess the correlation between maxillary intermolar width and masseter volume.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Maxillary intermolar width, masseter volume and thickness showed significant gender differences; all the tested variables decreased significantly according to the facial vertical pattern, with greater values in females, especially in low- and normal-angle subjects; maxillary intermolar width and masseter volume showed significant correlations, higher in females.

Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

AZD7762 is a Chk1 kinase inhibitor which increases sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, including gemcitabine. We evaluated the safety of AZD7762 monotherapy and with gemcitabine in advanced solid tumor patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this Phase I study, patients received intravenous AZD7762 on days 1 and 8 of a 14-day run-in cycle (cycle 0; AZD7762 monotherapy), followed by AZD7762 plus gemcitabine 750-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, in ascending AZD7762 doses (cycle 1; combination therapy).

RESULTS

Forty-two patients received AZD7762 6 mg (n = 9), 9 mg (n = 3), 14 mg (n = 6), 21 mg (n = 3), 30 mg (n = 7), 32 mg (n = 6), and 40 mg (n = 8), in combination with gemcitabine. Common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue [41 % (17/42) patients], neutropenia/leukopenia [36 % (15/42) patients], anemia/Hb decrease [29 % (12/42) patients] and nausea, pyrexia and alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increase [26 % (11/42) patients each]. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 19 and 52 % of patients in cycles 0 and 1, respectively. Cardiac dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two patients (both AZD7762 monotherapy): grade 3 troponin I increase (32 mg) and grade 3 myocardial ischemia with chest pain, electrocardiogram changes, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, and increased troponin I (40 mg). AZD7762 exposure increased linearly. Gemcitabine did not affect AZD7762 pharmacokinetics. Two non-small-cell lung cancer patients achieved partial tumor responses (AZD7762 6 mg/gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) and AZD7762 9 mg cohort).

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum-tolerated dose of AZD7762 in combination with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) was 30 mg. Although development of AZD7762 is not going forward owing to unpredictable cardiac toxicity, Chk1 remains an important therapeutic target.

Predictive value of phase I trials for safety in later trials and final approved dose: analysis of 61 approved cancer drugs

Phase I trials use a small number of patients to define a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety of new agents. We compared data from phase I and registration trials to determine whether early trials predicted later safety and final dose. We searched the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website for drugs approved in nonpediatric cancers (January 1990-October 2012). The recommended phase II dose (R2PD) and toxicities from phase I were compared with doses and safety in later trials. In 62 of 85 (73%) matched trials, the dose from the later trial was within 20% of the RP2D. In a multivariable analysis, phase I trials of targeted agents were less predictive of the final approved dose (OR, 0.2 for adopting ± 20% of the RP2D for targeted vs. other classes; P = 0.025). Of the 530 clinically relevant toxicities in later trials, 70% (n = 374) were described in phase I. A significant relationship (P = 0.0032) between increasing the number of patients in phase I (up to 60) and the ability to describe future clinically relevant toxicities was observed. Among 28,505 patients in later trials, the death rate that was related to drug was 1.41%. In conclusion, dosing based on phase I trials was associated with a low toxicity-related death rate in later trials. The ability to predict relevant toxicities correlates with the number of patients on the initial phase I trial. The final dose approved was within 20% of the RP2D in 73% of assessed trials.

Results of a phase I, open-label, randomized, crossover study evaluating the effects of linifanib on QTc intervals in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

Linifanib is a selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor family of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The purpose of this high-precision QT study was to evaluate the effects of linifanib on cardiac repolarization in patients with advanced metastatic tumors.

METHODS

Enrolled patients (n = 24) had measurable disease refractory to standard therapies, ECOG performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ function. Patients were randomized in a 2-sequence, 2-period crossover design. Serial ECG measurements and pharmacokinetic samples were collected for each crossover period. An intersection-union test was performed for time-matched baseline-adjusted QTcF intervals. An exposure-response analysis was explored to correlate the plasma concentration and QTcF.

RESULTS

The maximum 95 % upper confidence bound for the baseline-adjusted QTcF was 4.3 ms at hour 3 at the maximum tolerated linifanib dose of 0.25 mg/kg. Linifanib did not meet the regulatory threshold (10 ms) for QT prolongation. Exposure-response modeling showed that the QTcF change was not significant at the maximum plasma concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Linifanib does not significantly affect cardiac repolarization in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of circulating biomarkers of anti-NRP1, a novel antiangiogenesis agent, in two phase I trials in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

MNRP1685A is a monoclonal antibody to neuropilin-1 (NRP1). We evaluated blood-based pharmacodynamic biomarkers of MNRP1685A in two phase I studies to assess exposure/response relationships to inform target dose and regimen selection.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The phase I studies evaluated escalating doses of MNRP1685A as a single agent or in combination with bevacizumab. Plasma placental growth factor (PlGF), VEGF, and circulating NRP1 (cNRP1) were evaluated at multiple time points using meso-scale discovery (MSD) assays and ELISA, respectively. Plasma PlGF was also measured in a phase I/II trial of bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer (AVF0776). The association between PlGF and MNRP1685A dose was described by a sigmoid E(max) model. cNRP1 and MNRP1685A PK profiles were described using a two-target quasi-steady state (QSS) model.

RESULTS

A dose- and time-dependent increase in plasma PlGF and cNRP1 was observed in all patients treated with MNRP1685A. PK/PD analysis showed that bevacizumab and MNRP1685A had an additive effect in elevating PlGF. Predictions based on the two-target QSS model showed that the free drug concentration to maintain greater than 90% saturation of membrane NRP1 (mNRP1) and cNRP1 is about 8 μg/mL.

CONCLUSION

These data show that MNRP1685A inhibits the VEGF pathway in humans as assessed by an increase in plasma PlGF. MNRP1685A seems to enhance bevacizumab-mediated VEGF pathway blockade, as showed by an increase in the magnitude of PlGF elevation when combined with bevacizumab. PK/PD analysis of biomarkers in the phase I population allowed identification of doses at which apparent maximal pathway modulation was observed.

Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study

BACKGROUND

ALK fusion genes occur in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). We assessed the tolerability and activity of crizotinib in patients with NSCLC who were prospectively identified to have an ALK fusion within the first-in-man phase 1 crizotinib study.

METHODS

In this phase 1 study, patients with ALK-positive stage III or IV NSCLC received oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. Endpoints included tumour responses, duration of response, time to tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival at 6 and 12 months, and determination of the safety and tolerability and characterisation of the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of crizotinib after oral administration. Responses were analysed in evaluable patients and PFS and safety were analysed in all patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00585195.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 27, 2008, and June 1, 2011, 149 ALK-positive patients were enrolled, 143 of whom were included in the response-evaluable population. 87 of 143 patients had an objective response (60·8%, 95% CI 52·3-68·9), including three complete responses and 84 partial responses. Median time to first documented objective response was 7·9 weeks (range 2·1-39·6) and median duration of response was 49·1 weeks (95% CI 39·3-75·4). The response rate seemed to be largely independent of age, sex, performance status, or line of treatment. Median PFS was 9·7 months (95% CI 7·7-12·8). Median overall survival data are not yet mature, but estimated overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 87·9% (95% CI 81·3-92·3) and 74·8% (66·4-81·5), respectively. 39 patients continued to receive crizotinib for more than 2 weeks after progression because of perceived ongoing clinical benefit from the drug (12 for at least 6 months from the time of their initial investigator-defined disease progression). Overall, 144 (97%) of 149 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were mostly grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events were visual effects, nausea, diarrhoea, constipation, vomiting, and peripheral oedema. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=9), raised alanine aminotransferase (n=6), hypophosphataemia (n=6), and lymphopenia (n=6).

INTERPRETATION

Crizotinib is well tolerated with rapid, durable responses in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. There seems to be potential for ongoing benefit after initial disease progression in this population, but a more formal definition of ongoing benefit in this context is needed.

Phase I pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic study of the gamma secretase (Notch) inhibitor MK-0752 in adult patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

Aberrant Notch signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many human cancers. MK-0752 is a potent, oral inhibitor of γ-secretase, an enzyme required for Notch pathway activation. Safety, maximum-tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor efficacy were assessed in a phase I study of MK-0752.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MK-0752 was administered in three different schedules to patients with advanced solid tumors. Hair follicles were collected at higher dose levels to assess a gene signature of Notch inhibition.

RESULTS

Of 103 patients who received MK-0752, 21 patients received a continuous once-daily dosing at 450 and 600 mg; 17 were dosed on an intermittent schedule of 3 of 7 days at 450 and 600 mg; and 65 were dosed once per week at 600, 900, 1,200, 1,500, 1,800, 2,400, 3,200, and 4,200 mg. The most common drug-related toxicities were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. PKs (area under the concentration-time curve and maximum measured plasma concentration) increased in a less than dose proportional manner, with a half-life of approximately 15 hours. Significant inhibition of Notch signaling was observed with the 1,800- to 4,200-mg weekly dose levels, confirming target engagement at those doses. One objective complete response and an additional 10 patients with stable disease longer than 4 months were observed among patients with high-grade gliomas.

CONCLUSION

MK-0752 toxicity was schedule dependent. Weekly dosing was generally well tolerated and resulted in strong modulation of a Notch gene signature. Clinical benefit was observed, and rational combination trials are currently ongoing to maximize clinical benefit with this novel agent.

Simultaneous determination of 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosyl) uracil (FAU) and 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosyl) 5-methyluracil (FMAU) in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

A liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosyl) uracil (FAU) and its active metabolite 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosyl) 5-methyluracil (FMAU) in human plasma. FAU and FMAU were extracted from plasma samples using solid-phase extraction with Waters Sep-Pak® Vac C₁₈ cartridge. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters Atlantis T3 C₁₈ column with a gradient mobile phase consisting of methanol and water with 0.45% formic acid (v/v) running at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The analytes were monitored by triple quadrupole mass spectrometer under positive ionization mode. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 10 and 2 ng/ml for FAU and FMAU in plasma, respectively. Calibration curves were linear over FAU and FMAU plasma concentration range of 10-2000 and 2-1000 ng/ml, respectively. The intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision were within the generally accepted criteria for bioanalytical method (<15%). The method has been successfully employed to characterize the plasma pharmacokinetics of FAU and FMAU in cancer patients receiving 1-h intravenous infusion of FAU 50 mg/m².

Physicians' Use of Patients' Daily Reports of Quality of Life to Evaluate Treatment Response in Phase I Cancer Trials

For cancer patients on Phase I trials, one of the most important physician decisions is whether or not patients are deriving benefit from therapy. With an increasing number of cytostatic treatment agents, the criteria to determine patient response to Phase I treatment has become harder to define. Physicians are increasingly looking to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as quality of life (QOL) to help evaluate treatment response. Electronic daily diary (EDD) devices can be used by patients to report their QOL over extended periods of time, thereby providing a more accurate picture of how patients are affected by treatment on a daily basis. However, questions remain about how to integrate this patient-reported information into decisions about Phase I treatment. This study investigated how physicians use patients' daily QOL reports to evaluate patient response to Phase I treatment. Data were collected over a 4-month period from Phase I patients (N = 30) and physicians (N = 3) in an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center. Patients completed daily QOL reports using EDD devices and physicians were provided with a summary of patients' QOL before each visit. After the visit, doctors recorded their treatment decision and also rated the importance of four biomedical factors (Toxicity, Imaging, Labs, and Performance Status) and QOL in their treatment decision for that visit. Although physicians rated QOL as being very important in evaluating treatment response, in practice, when predictors of their decisions were analyzed, results showed they relied exclusively on biomedical data (Toxicity, Imaging) to make Phase I treatment decisions. Questions remain about the utility and effective integration of QOL and biomedical data in clinical decision-making processes in Phase I clinical trials.

Targeting the Hedgehog pathway in cancer

The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is a major regulator of many fundamental processes in vertebrate embryonic development including stem cell maintenance, cell differentiation, tissue polarity and cell proliferation. Constitutive activation of the Hh pathway leading to tumorigenesis is seen in basal cell carcinomas and medulloblastoma. A variety of other human cancers, including brain, gastrointestinal, lung, breast and prostate cancers, also demonstrate inappropriate activation of this pathway. Paracrine Hh signaling from the tumor to the surrounding stroma was recently shown to promote tumorigenesis. This pathway has also been shown to regulate proliferation of cancer stem cells and to increase tumor invasiveness. Targeted inhibition of Hh signaling may be effective in the treatment and prevention of many types of human cancers. The discovery and synthesis of specific Hh pathway inhibitors have significant clinical implications in novel cancer therapeutics. Several synthetic Hh antagonists are now available, several of which are undergoing clinical evaluation. The orally available compound, GDC-0449, is the farthest along in clinical development. Initial clinical trials in basal cell carcinoma and treatment of select patients with medulloblastoma have shown good efficacy and safety. We review the molecular basis of Hh signaling, the current understanding of pathway activation in different types of human cancers and we discuss the clinical development of Hh pathway inhibitors in human cancer therapy.

Association of human cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) polymorphisms with differential metabolism and cytotoxicity of aminoflavone

Aminoflavone (AF), a clinically investigational novel anticancer agent, requires sequential metabolic activation by CYP1A1 and SULT1A1 to exert its antitumor activities. The purpose of this study was to determine the functional significance of common polymorphisms of human CYP1A1 and SULT1A1 on the metabolism and cytotoxicity of AF. To this end, Chinese Hamster V79 cells were genetically engineered to stably express human CYP1A1*1 (wild-type), CYP1A1*2C (I462V), or CYP1A1*4 (T461N) and coexpress human CYP1A1*1 with human SULT1A1*1 (wild-type), SULT1A1*2 (R213H), or SULT1A1*3 (M223V). The metabolism and cytotoxicity of AF were evaluated in these cellular models. All common variants of CYP1A1 and SULT1A1 were actively involved in the metabolic activation of AF, but with a varying degree of activity. Whereas CYP1A1 I462V variant exhibited a superior activity (mainly caused by a significantly higher V(max)) for hydroxylations of AF, expression of different CYP1A1 variants did not confer cell differential sensitivity to AF. The cells coexpressing CYP1A1*1 with SULT1A1*1, SULT1A1*2, or SULT1A1*3 displayed SULT1A1 allele-specific sensitivity to AF: SULT1A1*3 exhibited the highest sensitivity (IC(50), 0.01 μmol/L), followed by SULT1A1*1 (IC(50), 0.5 μmol/L), and SULT1A1*2 showed the lowest sensitivity (IC(50), 4.4 μmol/L). These data suggest that the presence of low-activity SULT1A1*2 may predict poor response to AF, whereas the presence of high-activity CYP1A1/SULT1A1 alleles, especially combination of CYP1A1*2C and SULT1A1*3 or SULT1A1*1, may be beneficial to patients receiving AF. The present study provides a foundation for future clinical investigations of potential genetic biomarkers that may enable selection of patients for the greatest potential benefit from AF treatment.

Effect of coadministration of ketoconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on pharmacokinetics and tolerability of motesanib diphosphate (AMG 706) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Motesanib diphosphate is a novel angiogenesis inhibitor selectively targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptor and stem cell factor receptor. The purpose of this phase 1b, drug-drug interaction study was to investigate the effect of ketoconazole, a strong inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme, on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of motesanib diphosphate. Fourteen patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment were enrolled and received motesanib diphosphate 50 mg once daily from day 1 through 15. Patients were randomized to receive a single oral dose of ketoconazole 400 mg either on day 8 (Sequence 1; n = 7) or day 15 (Sequence 2; n = 7), while pharmacokinetic samples were collected. After completion of this part (day 16), 13 patients received an escalated once-daily dose of motesanib diphosphate 125 mg. Evaluable pharmacokinetic data (n = 12) suggest that ketoconazole modestly increased motesanib exposure. The motesanib area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 h increased by 86% (90% CI, 1.50-2.29; P < 0.001) and the maximum plasma concentration (C (max)) by 35% (90% CI, 1.12-1.64; P = 0.02), compared with motesanib diphosphate administration alone. The tolerability profile (with or without ketoconazole coadministration) was consistent with that from other motesanib diphosphate monotherapy studies. Treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate and commonly included fatigue (50% of patients), hypertension (43%), diarrhea (21%), dizziness (14%), paresthesia (14%), and vomiting (14%). Hypertension was the most common related grade 3 event (21%). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred.