Advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Impact of age on the safety and efficacy of cemiplimab and the prognostic significance of blood biomarkers

INTRODUCTION

Age-related differences in the safety profile of cemiplimab for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) have not been well described. We investigated the association of increasing age with immune related adverse events (irAE) from cemiplimab, efficacy outcomes, and the prognostic significance of pre-treatment blood biomarkers in contemporary practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients starting first-line cemiplimab for locally advanced or metastatic cSCC at British Columbia Cancer between April 2019 and January 2023 were identified. Landmark four-month logistic regression analysis compared the odds of developing irAE or sequelae amongst patients aged <75 years to those aged 75-84 or ≥ 85. Objective responses were determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Univariable Cox proportional hazard (PH) regression modelling of factors associated with overall survival (OS) was performed.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients, the proportions aged <75, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years were 34%, 45%, and 21%, respectively. Overall, the proportion of patients with irAE ≥ grade 3, cemiplimab discontinuation, and hospitalization for immune toxicity was 27.4%, 31.1%, and 11.3%, respectively. There was no clear association between age and the odds of high grade irAE. However, increased odds of cemiplimab discontinuation was observed in patients aged 75-84 years (p = 0.05). Patients ≥85 years had increased hospitalizations due to irAE (OR = 5.00, 95% CI = 0.97-37.52) with two treatment-related deaths. Objective responses were similar across age cohorts (50.0%, 60.4%, and 54.5%) but progressive disease was higher in the age ≥ 85 group (22.2%, 18.8%, and 31.8%). On Cox PH regression analysis, age ≥ 85 years (vs. <75), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-3 (vs. 0-1), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥7.80 (vs. <7.80) were associated with shorter survival.

DISCUSSION

While the odds of high grade irAE were similar across age groups, significant age-related differences in treatment discontinuation and hospitalization due to immune toxicity were observed. Despite a higher incidence of primary progression and shorter OS in the oldest cohort, cemiplimab yielded robust objective responses regardless of age. Higher pre-treatment NLR was associated with shorter survival and the cut-point identified requires further study.

First-line osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: efficacy and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The FLAURA trial demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with first-line osimertinib for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in a cohort treated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC between 11 March 2020 to 31 December 2021 who received first-line osimertinib in British Columbia, Canada were identified retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier curves of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of osimertinib were plotted. The associations of baseline characteristics with PFS, and development of pneumonitis or dose reductions due to toxicity with OS were evaluated with hazard ratios estimated using univariable and multivariable Cox models.

Results

The cohort comprised 231 individuals. 58.7% of patients with de novo advanced NSCLC were initially diagnosed after presentation to the Emergency Room. At osimertinib initiation, 31.6% were aged ≥75 years and 45.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2. Median PFS and OS were 18.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.1-26.2] and 25.4 months (95% CI: 20.3-not reached), respectively. On multivariable analysis, age ≥75 years (vs. <75), ECOG PS 2/3 (vs. 0/1), ECOG PS 4 (vs. 0/1), current smokers (vs. never smokers), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% (vs. <1%), and L858R mutation (vs. exon 19 deletion) were associated with shorter PFS. Among 110 patients who progressed, 33.6% received subsequent therapy. A proportion of 16.5% of the cohort developed grade ≥3 adverse events. Pneumonitis from osimertinib (3.9% incidence) was weakly associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio: 2.59, 95% CI: 0.94-7.12, P=0.066); dose reductions were not associated with worse OS. 10.8% of patients developed COVID-19.

Conclusions

In a cohort receiving first-line osimertinib during the COVID-19 pandemic, ECOG PS ≥2 was observed in nearly half of patients at treatment initiation contributing to a median OS shorter than in FLAURA. The incidence of severe adverse events was low and dose reduction for drug toxicity did not impact OS. Identifying and reducing barriers to the diagnosis of NSCLC during the COVID-19 pandemic are required.

Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma Treated With Whole-Lung Radiation

Background and objective

There is a scarcity of research on outcomes in patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma limited to pulmonary metastases who receive whole-lung radiotherapy (WLRT). In light of this, this study aimed to evaluate the use of WLRT and compare the survival outcomes between patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma who received treatment with WLRT and those who did not.

Materials and methods

Patients of all ages with metastatic Ewing sarcoma restricted to the lung who were referred to the British Columbia (BC) Cancer from 1995 to 2017 were identified from the Sarcoma Outcomes Unit (SARCOU). Patient demographics and tumor and treatment characteristics were compared between cohorts treated with WLRT versus those who did not undergo WLRT. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates and compared between treatment groups with log-rank tests.

Results

The study cohort comprised 30 patients (median follow-up time: 6.8 years). Overall, the median age of the patients was 16 years (range: 4-86 years) and 60% were female; the primary disease sites were as follows: 27% axial skeleton, 53% appendicular skeleton, 20% visceral, 86% had ≥2 lung metastases, and 60% had bilateral disease. Fifteen (50%) patients received WLRT (median of 1500 cGy in 10 fractions). Chemotherapy was used in 97% of patients. The rate of surgery for lung metastases was 40%, which was similar between the WLRT and non-WLRT groups. The median size of the largest lung metastasis in the WLRT cohort was 1 cm (range: 0.3-1.8 cm), compared to 2 cm (range 0.5-6.7 cm) in the non-WLRT cohort (p=0.05). Demographics and tumor characteristics were otherwise not significantly different between the two treatment groups (all p>0.05). Among patients who received WLRT, 53% had complete response (CR), 7% partial response (PR), and 40% had disease progression. The five-year PFS was 86% vs. 59% (p=0.33) and OS was 78% vs. 54% (p=0.24) respectively for patients in the WLRT group vs. those in the non-WLRT group. The five-year PFS outcomes were higher on univariate analysis in patients with appendicular skeletal compared to axial skeletal and visceral primary sites (87.5% vs. 58% vs. 50%, respectively, p=0.02) and in patients with the size of the largest lung metastasis <2 cm vs. those with a size ≥2 cm (80% vs. 25%, p=0.04).

Conclusions

Patients treated with WLRT had a smaller-volume lung disease and over half of the patients who received WLRT had either complete or partial response. Trends of improved PFS and OS at five years were observed among patients who received WLRT compared to the non-WLRT group, but these were not statistically significant.

A multi-institutional prediction model to estimate the risk of recurrence and mortality after mastectomy for T1-2N1 breast cancer

Background

Post‐mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in women with pathologic stage T1‐2N1M0 breast cancer is controversial.

Methods

Data from five North American institutions including women undergoing mastectomy without neoadjuvant therapy with pT1‐2N1M0 breast cancer treated from 2006 to 2015 were pooled for analysis. Competing‐risks regression was performed to identify factors associated with locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), overall recurrence (OR), and breast cancer mortality (BCM).

Results

A total of 3532 patients were included for analysis with a median follow‐up time among survivors of 6.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4.5–9.5 years). The 2154 (61%) patients who received PMRT had significantly more adverse risk factors than those patients not receiving PMRT: younger age, larger tumors, more positive lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular extension, and positive margins (p < .05 for all). On competing risk regression analysis, receipt of PMRT was significantly associated with a decreased risk of LRR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14–0.31; p < .001) and OR (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62–0.94; p = .011). Model performance metrics for each end point showed good discrimination and calibration. An online prediction model to estimate predicted risks for each outcome based on individual patient and tumor characteristics was created from the model.

Conclusions

In a large multi‐institutional cohort of patients, PMRT for T1‐2N1 breast cancer was associated with a significant reduction in locoregional and overall recurrence after accounting for known prognostic factors. An online calculator was developed to aid in personalized decision‐making regarding PMRT in this population.

In a large multi‐institutional cohort of patients, post‐mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for T1‐2N1 breast cancer was associated with a significant reduction in locoregional and overall recurrence after accounting for known prognostic factors. An online calculator was developed to aid in personalized decision‐making regarding PMRT in this population.

Locoregional Treatments for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in British Columbia: A Retrospective Cohort Study from January 2008 to December 2017

Simple Summary

It is not known if surgery, radiation treatment (RT) or other types of locolregional treatment (LRT) may be beneficial for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (mGIST) in addition to systemic treatment. Our study aims to address this question by analyzing a cohort of 127 mGIST patients in British Columbia over a decade (from January 2008 to December 2017). We showed that mGIST patients who underwent surgery and LRT seemed to have better survival when compared to patients who did not undergo surgery and LRT. However, this treatment strategy should only be considered in patients with limited volume metastatic disease or oligoprogression while the rest of the disease is well controlled with systemic treatment. In addition, RT can offer palliative benefits such as pain relief and bleeding control. Our study, consistent with other retrospective studies, supports LRT consideration in selected mGIST patients within a multidisciplinary setting. This approach is not considered as a “standard of care” due to lack of prospective clinical trials but may improve clinical outcome for some mGIST patients.

Abstract

Introduction: The role of surgery and non-surgical locoregional treatments (LRT) such as radiation therapy (RT) and local ablation techniques in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is unclear. This study examines LRT practice patterns in metastatic GIST and their clinical outcomes in British Columbia (BC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with either recurrent or de novo metastatic GIST from January 2008 to December 2017 were identified. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed in patients who underwent LRT, including surgical resection of the primary tumor or metastectomy, RT, or other local ablative procedures. Results: 127 patients were identified: 52 (41%) had de novo metastasis and 75 (59%) had recurrent metastasis. Median age was 67 (23–90 years), 58.2% were male, primary site was 33.1% stomach, 40.2% small intestine, 11% rectum/pelvis, and 15.7% others. 37 (29.1%) of patients received palliative surgery, the majority of which had either primary tumor removal only (43.3%) or both primary tumor removal and metastectomy (35.1%). A minority of patients underwent metastectomy only (21.6%). A total of 12 (9.5%) patients received palliative RT to metastatic sites only (58.3%) or primary tumors only (41.7%), mostly for symptomatic control (n = 9). A few patients (n = 3) received local ablation for liver metastatic deposits with 1 patient receiving microwave ablation (MWA) and 2 receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Most patients (n = 120, 94.5%) received some type of systemic treatment. It is notable that prolonged progression free survival (PFS) was observed for the majority of patients who underwent surgery in the metastatic setting with a median PFS of 20.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 14.29–40.74) months. In addition, significantly higher median overall survival (mOS) was observed in patients who underwent surgery (97.15 months; 95% CI: 77.7-not reached) and LRT (78.98 months; 95% CI: 65.58-not reached) versus no surgery (45.37 months; 95% CI: 38.7–64.69) and no LRT (45.27 months; 95% CI: 33.25–58.66). Almost all patients (8 out of 9) achieved symptomatic improvement after palliative RT. All 3 patients achieved partial response and 2 out of 3 patients had relatively durable responses of 1 year or more after local ablation. Discussion: This study is among the first to systematically examine the use of various LRT in metastatic GIST management. Integration of LRT with systemic treatments may potentially provide promising durable response and prolonged survival for highly selected metastatic GIST patients with low volume disease, limited progression and otherwise well controlled on systemic treatments. These observations, consistent with others, add to the growing evidence that supports the judicious use of LRT in combination with systemic treatments to further optimize the care of metastatic GIST patients.

Time to Treatment With Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab for Patients With Advanced Melanoma in Everyday Practice

Background The anti-programmed cell death one antibodies (Anti-PD-1 Ab) pembrolizumab or nivolumab are commonly prescribed to patients with advanced melanoma. The purpose of the current study is to identify baseline clinical characteristics associated with time to treatment initiation (TTI) of pembrolizumab or nivolumab for advanced melanoma and whether treatment delays are associated with differences in survival outcomes. Methods All patients receiving Anti-PD-1 Ab as a first-line treatment for advanced melanoma outside of clinical trials at British Columbia Cancer Agency between 10/2015 and 10/2019 were identified retrospectively. TTI was defined as the interval from pathologic diagnosis of advanced melanoma to first Anti-PD-1 Ab treatment. To determine the association between TTI and baseline characteristics, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses provided an estimate of the instantaneous relative risk of starting treatment at any time point (hazard ratio [HR] >1 indicates shorter TTI). To describe changes in overall survival (OS) observed for each four-week delay in treatment initiation, multivariable cox proportional hazard regression modelling was also performed. Results In a cohort of 302 patients, the median TTI was 52 days (interquartile range 30.2-99.0). Pulmonary metastases (M1b)/non-central nervous system visceral metastases (M1c) vs. metastases to skin or non-regional lymph nodes (M1a)(HR=1.50, 95% CI=1.12-2.02; p=0.007) and pre-treatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) >1 (vs 0/1, HR=1.50, 95% CI= 1.11-2.01; p=0.008) were associated with earlier TTI. An association between treatment delay and improved OS was observed. Conclusion Patients having visceral metastases and poor baseline ECOG PS were more likely to initiate Anti-PD-1 Ab sooner. The association of shorter TTI with worse OS likely represents confounding by indication (urgent treatment offered to patients with aggressive disease).

Immune related adverse events and treatment discontinuation in patients older and younger than 75 years with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab or pembrolizumab

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell-death 1 antibodies (PD-1 Ab) improve overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced melanoma in trials; however, safety data in patients ≥75 years are lacking. The prognostic significance of and risk factors for PD-1 Ab discontinuation due immune related adverse events (irAE) are also uncertain.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma receiving frontline PD-1 Ab at British Columbia Cancer outside of clinical trials between 10/2015-10/2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence and subtypes of irAE were compared between age subgroups <75 and ≥ 75 years. Univariable logistic regression identified variables associated with treatment discontinuation within four months of PD-1 Ab initiation. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine factors significantly associated with OS.

RESULTS

302 patients were identified, of whom 126 (41.7%) were ≥ 75 years. During all follow-up, 15.9% of patients experienced irAE grade 3/4 and 27.2% of the cohort stopped PD-1 Ab due to immune toxicity. irAE incidence, hospitalization, and need for steroids by the four-month landmark were similar amongst age groups. Advanced age was not associated with risk of PD-1 Ab discontinuation from irAE on logistic regression. For the entire cohort, pre-treatment factors associated with shorter OS on multivariable analysis were ECOG performance status ≥1, M1d stage, lactate dehydrogenase >224, and neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio ≥ 5. On four-month landmark multivariable analysis, treatment discontinuation due to irAE was significantly associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSION

Patients aged ≥75 years experienced similar irAE rates and treatment discontinuation for immune toxicity compared to younger patients. As PD-1 Ab discontinuation due to irAE was associated with shorter OS, efforts to treat irAE early are warranted to potentially avoid therapy cessation.

Survival Outcomes Following Discontinuation of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Advanced Melanoma in a Population-based Cohort

AIMS

Induction ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab improve overall survival compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma, but immune-related adverse events (irAE) occur commonly. The need for induction discontinuation because of irAE and the relationship between irAE and survival in non-trials patients are unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma receiving first-line combination immunotherapy at one of six centres between December 2017 and February 2020 outside of trials were identified retrospectively. Landmark 12-week Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate associations between discontinuation of induction therapy on overall survival and time to treatment failure (TTF). Multivariable analysis of factors influencing overall survival and TTF was undertaken.

RESULTS

Among 95 patients, the median age was 62 years, 38.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1 and 22.1% had brain metastases. The median follow-up for the whole cohort was 19.8 months by the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Any grade and grade 3-4 irAE were noted in 78.9% and 44.2% of the cohort, respectively. 44.2% of patients completed induction immunotherapy, whereas 41.1% did not due to irAE. Twelve-week landmark overall survival and TTF were similar in patients who completed induction versus those who did not due to irAE. On multivariable analysis, any grade irAE (versus none) was associated with longer overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.82, P = 0.02) and TTF (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.81, P = 0.01). Grade 3-4 irAE correlated with longer TTF (hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-1.01, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based cohort, discontinuation of induction immunotherapy as a result of irAE did not adversely affect overall survival or TTF. irAE observed during ipilimumab and nivolumab induction were associated with improved survival outcomes.

Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Is Effective for Patients With Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis

PURPOSE

This study evaluated long-term, population-based, breast cancer-specific outcomes in patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) to the breast/chest wall plus regional nodes using hypofractionated (HF) (40-42.5 Gy/16 fractions) versus conventionally fractionated (CF) regimens (50-50.4 Gy/25-28 fractions).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A prospective provincial database was used to identify patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer treated with curative-intent breast/chest wall + regional nodal RT from 1998 to 2010. The effect of RT fractionation on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was assessed for the entire cohort and for high-risk subgroups: grade 3, ER-/HER2-, HER2+, and ≥4 positive nodes. Multivariable analysis and 2:1 case-match comparison of HF versus CF were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 5487 patients met the inclusion criteria (4006 HF and 1481 CF). Median age was 55 years, and median follow-up was 12.7 years. On multivariable analysis, no statistically significant differences were identified in 10-year LRRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.27; P = .46), DRFS (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; P = .19), or BCSS (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.10; P = .36) between the HF and CF cohorts. There was no statistical difference in breast cancer-specific outcomes in the high-risk subgroups. On analysis of 2962 HF cases matched to 1481 CF controls, no statistical difference was observed in LRRFS (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.71-1.33; P = .87), DRFS (HR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85-1.11; P = .68), or BCSS (HR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87-1.16; P = .92).

CONCLUSIONS

This large, population-based analysis with long-term follow-up after locoregional RT demonstrated that modest HF provides similar breast cancer-specific outcomes compared with CF. HF is an effective option for patients with stage I to III breast cancer receiving nodal RT.

Comparison of Nodal Target Volume Definition in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy According to RTOG Versus ESTRO Atlases: A Practical Review From the TransAtlantic Radiation Oncology Network (TRONE)

Regional nodal irradiation has gained interest in recent years with the publication of several important randomized trials and the availability of more conformal techniques. Target volume delineation represents a critical step in the radiation planning process. Adequate coverage of the microscopic tumor spread to regional lymph nodes must be weighed against exposure of critical structures such as the heart and lungs. Among available guidelines for delineating the clinical target volume for the breast/chest wall and regional nodes, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines are the most widely used internationally. These guidelines have been formulated based on anatomic boundaries of areas historically covered in 2-dimensional field-based radiation therapy but have not been validated by patterns-of-failure studies. In recent years, an important body of data has emerged from mapping studies documenting patterns of local and regional recurrence. We aim to review, discuss, and compare contouring guidelines for breast cancer radiation therapy in the context of contemporary data on locoregional relapse to improve their implementation in modern practice.

Hypofractionated radiation treatment for breast cancer: The time is now

While there is now Level I data with long-term follow-up supporting the routine use of hypofractionated (HF) whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) after breast-conserving surgery, its adoption has been slow and variable. This article will review the literature supporting the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation for breast cancer, discuss the radiobiological rationale specific to breast tumors, and make an argument for justifying the routine adoption of shorter, HF-WBRT courses when delivering breast radiation. Data using HF with regional nodal irradiation and in the post-mastectomy setting will also be reviewed. The aim is to provide an in-depth understanding of the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer, its applicability, and topics warranting future research.

Local Relapse and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Scalp Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study of 95 Patients Treated in a Provincial Cancer Care Institution Over 25 Years

Objectives

There is limited literature on the optimal treatment of sarcoma arising in the scalp. This study evaluates local relapse (LR) and survival outcomes of patients with scalp sarcoma treated at a provincial cancer care institution.

Methods

A retrospective review of 95 patients with a primary diagnosis of scalp sarcoma referred from 1990-2015 was completed. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to estimate LR-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were compared using log-rank tests. Regression analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The median age at diagnosis was 77 years. The most common histologies were angiosarcoma (27%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (24%), and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (21%). Final margins were 36% positive, 28% close, 31% negative, and 5% unknown. Of 73 patients treated with curative-intent, 32 (44%) experienced LR. Five-year LRFS was 56.0% and overall survival was 48.3%. Patients with close or positive margins who received pre- or post-operative radiotherapy (n=19) had similar LR risk compared to patients who did not (n=34) (five-year LRFS 41.8% vs 69.1%; p=0.145). On multivariate analysis, angiosarcoma was associated with a higher LR risk (Hazard ratio (HR) 12.06, p<0.001). The use of radiotherapy showed a trend towards reduced LR risk but did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.37, p=0.066).

Conclusions

Patients with scalp sarcoma have high risk of LR, particularly in cases with positive margins. Adjuvant radiation was not associated with improved local control for close or positive margins. Complete surgical excision to establish negative margins remains the primary standard treatment for patients with this rare disease.

Subventricular Zone Radiation Dose and Outcome for Glioblastoma Treated Between 2006 and 2012

Objective Stem cells residing in the subventricular zone (SVZ) may be related to recurrence, potentially affecting outcome in glioblastoma (GBM). This study investigated the relationship of SVZ radiation dose and survival in a large cohort treated with surgery and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods Patients with GBM treated between 2006 and 2012 (n = 370) were identified. SVZs were contoured from planning computed tomography (CT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration where available. Dose was extracted from dose volume histograms. Kaplan-Meier (KM) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were compared with log-rank tests for SVZ doses. Multivariate analysis (MVA) identified clinical and treatment-related factors significantly associated with outcome. Results Median follow-up was 16.4 months, 48.1% underwent gross total resection (GTR), 37.5% subtotal resection, and 14.4% biopsy without resection. Median PFS was 8.9 months (95% CI: 8.3-9.8 months), and OS was 16.5 months (95% CI: 15.2-17.6 months). PFS was significantly lower for older age (>50 years, P = 0.045), poor Karnofsky performance status (KPS, P = 0.049), multifocality (P < 0.001), and incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001). Worse OS was associated with poor KPS (P = 0.001), biopsy only (P = 0.003), multifocality (P = 0.009), and failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001). SVZ dose was not associated with outcome for any of the dose levels assessed. On MVA, multifocality was associated with worse PFS (P < 0.01). Poor performance status and biopsy only were associated with worse OS (both P < 0.01). Conclusion In this analysis of a large cohort of GBM treated with surgery and CRT, increased SVZ dose was not associated with improved survival.

Abscopal Effect after Palliative Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus

The abscopal effect is a rare phenomenon in the treatment of metastatic cancer where tumor regression occurs distant from the irradiated volume. It is thought that local radiation induces immunogenic cell death by systemically enhancing the host’s antitumor immune system. We present a rare case of the abscopal effect in esophageal adenocarcinoma. After palliative radiation therapy to the primary tumor and adjacent lymph nodes, a complete response was observed not only in the irradiated tissues, but also in non-irradiated metastatic lymph nodes. The patient remains cancer-free one year later. A better understanding of the abscopal effect may lead to novel research to improve patient outcome in the often dismal case of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Radiation generates an abscopal response and complete resolution of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: a case report

The abscopal effect is a rare phenomenon in the setting of radiation therapy (RT) for metastatic cancer where tumor regression occurs distant from the site of treatment. A proposed mechanism of the abscopal effect is the activation of a systemic antitumor immune response by localized RT. We report the first case, to our knowledge, of the abscopal effect in squamous carcinoma of the anal canal with metastases to pelvic lymph nodes, liver and bone. After palliative RT to the pelvis with sensitizing chemotherapy, complete response was observed not only in the primary tumor but also in bone and multiple liver metastases at 4 months after treatment, an effect that remained durable at 4-year follow-up. Understanding of the abscopal effect and the immune mechanisms associated with anal cancer may lead to new avenues of research to improve outcome for patients with this rare disease.

Malignant Epithelial Transformation in Phyllodes Tumor: A Population-Based Case Series

Background Phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast is an uncommon fibroepithelial neoplasm. Malignant epithelial transformation in PT is rare. This study reports clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with malignant epithelial transformation in PT. Methods From an institutional database of 183 patients with newly diagnosed PT referred to a Canadian provincial cancer institution between 1999 and 2014, 11 cases of PT with concomitant in situ or invasive carcinoma were identified. Descriptive analysis was performed to document the characteristics, treatment and outcomes of this cohort. Results Prevalence of malignant epithelial transformation in PT was 6.0%. Median (range) age was 54 (35-75) years. Types of carcinoma were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 6), lobular carcinoma in situ (n = 4), and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (n = 1). Median PT size was 5 (1-15) cm. Three PTs were classified as benign (27%), five as borderline (45%), and three as malignant (27%). Mastectomy was performed in six (55%) and breast conserving surgery in five (45%) patients. Hormonal therapy was used in two cases: one with a 1 cm, grade 2 DCIS, and one with an 11 cm, grade 1 IDC, the latter also receiving radiotherapy. Mean follow-up duration was 54 (6-175) months. None of the cases showed any evidence of disease after treatment at the time of their last follow-up. Conclusion This case series showed a higher prevalence of malignant epithelial transformation in PT than reported in previous literature. Outcomes were favourable despite the presence of either in situ or invasive carcinoma within PT.

Association of Radiotherapy Boost for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Local Control After Whole-Breast Radiotherapy

Importance

The use of a radiotherapy (RT) boost to the tumor bed after whole-breast RT (WBRT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is largely extrapolated from invasive cancer data, but robust evidence specific to DCIS is lacking.

Objective

To compare ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in women with DCIS treated with vs without the RT boost after breast-conserving surgery and WBRT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective analysis pooled deidentified patient-level data from 10 academic institutions in the United States, Canada, and France from January 1, 1980, through December 31, 2010. All patients had newly diagnosed pure DCIS (no microinvasion), underwent breast-conserving surgery, and received WBRT with or without the boost with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up required for inclusion in the analysis. Given the limited events after WBRT, an a priori power analysis was conducted to estimate the DCIS sample size needed to detect the anticipated benefit of the boost. Data were uniformly recoded at the host institution and underwent primary and secondary reviews before analysis. Sample size calculations (ratio of patients who received the boost dose to those who did not, 2:1; α = .05; power = 80%) estimated that 2982 cases were needed to detect a difference of at least 3%. The final analysis included 4131 patients (2661 in the boost group and 1470 in the no-boost group) with a median follow-up of 9 years and media boost dose of 14 Gy. Data were collected from July 2011 through February 2014 and analyzed from March 2014 through August 2015.

Interventions

Radiotherapy boost vs no boost.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.

Results

The analysis included 4131 patients (median [SD] age, 56.1 [10.9] years; range, 24-88 years). Patients with positive margins, unknown estrogen receptor status, and comedo necrosis were more likely to have received an RT boost. For the entire cohort, the boost was significantly associated with lower IBTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .01) and with IBTR-free survival (boost vs no-boost groups) of 97.1% (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) vs 96.3% (95% CI, 0.95-0.97) at 5 years, 94.1% (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) vs 92.5% (95% CI, 0.91-0.94) at 10 years, and 91.6% (95% CI, 0.90-0.93) vs 88.0% (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) at 15 years. On multivariable analysis accounting for confounding factors, the boost remained significantly associated with reduced IBTR (HR compared with no boost, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = .01) independent of age and tamoxifen citrate use.

Conclusions and Relevance

This patient-level analysis suggests that the RT boost confers a statistically significant benefit in decreasing IBTR across all DCIS age groups, similar to that seen in patients with invasive breast cancer. These findings suggest that a DCIS RT boost to the tumor bed could be considered to provide an added incremental benefit in decreasing IBTR after a shared discussion between the patient and her radiation oncologist.

Acute Inflammatory Response During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Case Report

We report on a 56-year-old Caucasian female, diagnosed with locally advanced, hormone-receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancer of the left breast. The patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by docetaxel/trastuzumab. A partial clinical and radiographical response was documented after four cycles of AC. Approximately one week after the first cycle of docetaxel and trastuzumab, the patient presented with diffuse edema, erythema, and induration involving the entire left breast. The differential diagnoses included infection, inflammatory response/reaction to docetaxel, or cancer progression. After a multidisciplinary review, the decision was made to stop the docetaxel and deliver neoadjuvant radiation treatment concurrent with trastuzumab. Approximately four weeks after radiation therapy completion, the patient underwent a left total mastectomy and axillary dissection, with pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast and axillary nodal disease. After surgery, systemic therapy was resumed with paclitaxel and trastuzumab, with a plan to start adjuvant endocrine therapy after completion of chemotherapy. We will discuss clinical considerations in the management of the unexpected findings of acute inflammatory response in the breast and nodal regions during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Associations between intrinsic breast cancer subtype and pCR in locally advanced breast cancer will also be reviewed.

Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

Objective

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. This study examined long-term outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with pure DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, BCS + radiotherapy (RT), and mastectomy. Outcomes were compared between patients referred versus not referred for oncologic assessment after definitive surgery.

Materials and methods

Subjects were 2575 women diagnosed between 1985 and 1999. Data from several electronic databases were linked and analyzed. Outcomes were invasive local recurrence-free survival (ILRFS), mastectomy-free survival (MFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Median follow-up time was 9.8 years. Overall, 56% (n = 1448) of subjects were referred to a cancer centre. Factors associated with non-referral were older age, comorbidities, and travel distance. Ten-year MFS, BCSS, and OS were higher among referred patients (all p ≤ 0.001). In cohorts treated with BCS alone (n = 1314) vs. BCS + RT (n = 510) vs. mastectomy (n = 751), 10-year ILRFS were 93.7% vs. 96.6% vs. 97.7%, (p < 0.001) and BCSS were 97.6% vs. 99.8% vs. 98.6%, (p = 0.01). Corresponding rates of ipsilateral invasive breast relapse at 10 years were 6.3% after BCS alone, 3.4% after BCS + RT, and 2.3% after mastectomy (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with improved ILRFS were older age at diagnosis, low comorbidity score, absence of comedo histology, mastectomy, and post-BCS RT.

Conclusion

Patients with DCIS referred for oncologic assessment were more likely to undergo post-BCS RT, resulting in lower mastectomy and higher survival rates compared to non-referred patients. Patients with significant comorbidities were less likely to be referred and experienced lower ILRFS and BCSS. Referral for multidisciplinary oncologic assessment after surgery is warranted to individualize management and optimize outcomes for patients with DCIS.

Abstract P5-08-13: Phyllodes tumours of the breast: The British Columbia cancer agency experience

Background

Phyllodes tumours (PT) of the breast are uncommon fibroepithelial lesions for which optimal management remains unclear. This population-based study reports treatment and outcomes for patients with PT and evaluates characteristics that influence outcome.

Methods

Data were analysed on 183 patients with newly diagnosed PT referred to the BC Cancer Agency from 1999-2014. Follow-up was obtained from chart and death records and letters to general practitioners. Five-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) local recurrence (LR) and survival were compared between cohorts with benign (n=83), borderline (n=50) and malignant PT (n=49) histology. Subtype was unknown in 1 patient who did not receive surgery due to severe comorbidity. Univariate analysis was performed using Cox regression modeling.

Results

Median follow-up was 65 (range 0.5-197) months. Median age was 48 (range 14–87) years. Median tumour size was 4 (range 1-23) cm. Heterologous sarcomatous differentiation was seen in 15 and malignant epithelial transformation in 11 patients. Local excision was performed in 163 (89%) and mastectomy in 19 (10%) patients. Margin status after local excision were: negative (&gt;1mm, n=121, 74%), close (≤1mm, n=21, 13%), positive (tumour touching ink, n=20, 12%), or unknown (n=1, 1%). Margin status after mastectomy were negative (n=14, 74%) or close (n=5, 26%). Tumour borders were pushing (n=62, 34%), intermediate (n=22, 12%), infiltrative (n=38, 21%) or unknown (n=60, 33%). Eleven patients with malignant PT received radiation therapy as part of initial treatment. In these cases median tumour size was 8 cm and heterologous sarcomatous differentiation was present in 46% compared to 4 cm and 16% in malignant cases who did not receive RT.

LR occurred in 16 cases (5 benign, 4 borderline and 7 malignant). Distant metastases (DM) occurred in 7 patients with malignant PT leading to 6 cause specific deaths.

Five-year KM outcomes among women with benign, borderline, and malignant PT were: LR 6% vs 9% vs 21%, P=0.131; overall survival 96% vs 100% vs 82%, P=0.002; and disease free survival 94% vs 91% vs 67%, P&lt;0.001. DM-free and cause specific survival at 5 years for malignant cases were 82% and 88% respectively.

Five-year KM LR among women with negative vs close vs positive margins were 8% vs 6% vs 37%, P&lt;0.001. Corresponding rates for intermediate vs pushing vs infiltrative borders were 6% vs 6% vs 33%, P=0.006.

On univariate analyses, large tumour size, postmenopausal status, malignant classification, necrosis, positive margins, and infiltrative borders were factors associated with increased risk of any type of relapse (all P≤0.014). Positive margins and infiltrative tumour border were associated with increased LR (all P≤0.006), and the latter remained significant in exploratory analyses after adjusting for margin status and PT classification. Advanced age at diagnosis and large tumour size were predictors of DM (all P≤0.001).

Conclusion

In this population-based series, 5-year outcomes among women with PT are comparable to those reported in the literature. Exploratory analysis suggests that infiltrative tumour borders may be used in conjunction with margin status to assess LR risk. While close margin was not associated with increased LR, re-excision is warranted for cases with positive margins.

Citation Format: Rodrigues MF, Truong PT, Weir LM, Knowling MA, Wai ES. Phyllodes tumours of the breast: The British Columbia cancer agency experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-13.

Patient preferences for timing and access to radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Patient preferences for radiation therapy (rt) access were investigated.

METHODS

Patients completing a course of rt at 6 centres received a 17-item survey that rated preferences for time of day; day of week; actual, ideal, and reasonable travel times for rt; and actual, ideal, and reasonable times between referral and first oncologic consultation. Patients receiving single-fraction rt or brachytherapy alone were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the respondents who returned surveys (n = 1053), 54% were women, and 74% had received more than 15 rt fractions. With respect to appointment times, 88% agreed or strongly agreed that rt between 08h00 and 16h30 was preferred; 14%-15% preferred 07h30-08h00 or 16h30-17h00; 10% preferred 17h00-18h00; and 6% or fewer preferred times before 07h30 or after 18h00. A preference not to receive rt before 07h30 or after 18h00 was expressed by 30% or more of the respondents. When days of the week were considered, 18% and 11% would have preferred to receive rt on a Saturday or Sunday respectively; 52% and 55% would have preferred not to receive rt on those days. A travel time of 1 hour or less for rt was reported by 82%, but 61% felt that a travel time of 1 hour or more was reasonable. A first consultation within 2 weeks of referral was felt to be ideal or reasonable by 88% and 73% of patients respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An rt service designed to meet patient preferences would make most capacity available between 08h00 and 16h30 on weekdays and provide 10%-20% of rt capacity on weekends and during 07h30-08h00 and 16h30-18h00 on weekdays. Approximately 80%, but not all, of the responding patients preferred a 2-week or shorter interval between referral and first oncologic consultation.

Population-based analysis of the impact and generalizability of the NSABP-B24 study on endocrine therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

In 1999, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)-B24 trial demonstrated that tamoxifen reduced relapse risk in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT). In 2002, Allred's subgroup analysis showed that tamoxifen mainly benefitted estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease. This study evaluates the impact and generalizability of these trial findings at the population level.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1989 to 2009, 2061 women with DCIS underwent BCS + RT in British Columbia. The following cohorts were analyzed: (1) pre-NSABP-B24 era (1989-1998, N = 417); (2) post-NSABP-B24 era (2000-2009, N = 1548). Cohort 2 was further divided into pre- and post-Allred eras.

RESULTS

Endocrine therapy (ET) was used in 404/2061 (20%) patients. Median age of patients treated with compared with without ET, was 53 versus 57 years, (P < 0.0005). One of 417 (0.2%) versus 399/1548 (26%) patients took ET before versus after NSABP-B24. Among the post-Allred era cohort treated with ET (N = 227), tumors were ER-positive in 65%, ER-negative in 1%, and ER-unknown in 33%; whereas of those treated without ET (N = 801), ER was positive in 43%, negative in 15%, and unknown in 42% (P < 0.0005). On multivariable analysis of the post-NSABP-B24 era, ET was associated with improved event-free survival (EFS) (hazard ratio 0.6; P = 0.02); 5-year EFS were 96.9% with ET versus 94.5% without ET.

CONCLUSIONS

ET use in DCIS patients treated with BCS + RT increased significantly after the NSABP-B24 study. ER+ disease and younger age were associated with increased ET use. ET was associated with improved EFS, confirming the generalizability of trial data at a population level.

Should women younger than 40 years of age with invasive breast cancer have a mastectomy? 15-year outcomes in a population-based cohort

PURPOSE

Optimal local management for young women with early-stage breast cancer remains controversial. This study examined 15-year outcomes among women younger than 40 years treated with breast-conserving surgery plus whole-breast radiation therapy (BCT) compared with those treated with modified radical mastectomy (MRM).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Women aged 20 to 39 years with early-stage breast cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 2003 were identified in a population-based database. Primary outcomes of breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes of local relapse-free survival (LRFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between BCT and MRM cohorts using log-rank tests. A planned subgroup analysis was performed on patients considered "ideal" for BCT (ie, T1N0, negative margins and no extensive ductal carcinoma in situ) and in whom local therapy may have the largest impact on survival because of low systemic risk.

RESULTS

965 patients were identified; 616 had BCT and 349 had MRM. The median follow-up time was 14.4 years (range, 8.4-23.3 years). Overall, 15-year rates of BCSS (76.0% vs 74.1%, P=.62), OS (74.2% vs 73.0%, P=.75), LRFS (85.4% vs 86.5%, P=.95), LRRFS (82.2% vs 81.6%, P=.61), and DRFS (74.4% vs 71.6%, P=.40) were similar between the BCT and MRM cohorts. In the "ideal" for BCT subgroup, there were 219 BCT and 67 MRM patients with a median follow-up time of 15.5 years. The 15-year BCSS (86.1% vs 82.9%, P=.57), OS (82.6% vs 82.9%, P=.89), LRFS (86.2% vs 84.2%, P=.50), LRRFS (83.1% vs 78.3%, P=.24), and DRFS (84.8% vs 79.1%, P=.17) were similar in the BCT and MRM cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based analysis with long-term follow-up confirmed that women younger than 40 years treated with BCT had similar 15-year outcomes compared with MRM. Young age alone is not a contraindication to BCT.

Identification of patients at very low risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery

PURPOSE

To identify clinical and pathological factors that identify groups of women with stage I breast cancer with a 5-year risk of local recurrence (LR) ≤1.5% after breast-conserving therapy (BCS) plus whole-breast radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Study subjects were 5974 patients ≥50 years of age whose cancer was diagnosed between 1989 and 2006, and were referred with pT1 pN0 invasive breast cancer treated with BCS and RT. Cases of 5- and 10-year LR were examined using Kaplan-Meier methods. Recursive partitioning analysis was performed in patients treated with and without endocrine therapy to identify combinations of factors associated with a 5-year LR risk ≤1.5%.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 8.61 years. Median age was 63 years of age (range, 50 to 91). Overall 5-year LR was 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2%-1.9%) and 10-year LR was 3.4% (95% CI, 2.8%-4.0%). Of 2830 patients treated with endocrine therapy, patient subsets identified with 5-year LR ≤1.5% included patients with grade 1 histology (n=1038; LR, 0.2%; 95% CI, 0%-0.5%) or grade 2 histology plus ≥60 years of age (n=843; LR, 0.5%; 95% CI, 0%-1.0%). Ten-year LR for these groups were 0.8% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.6%) and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.6%), respectively. Of 3144 patients treated without endocrine therapy, patients with grade 1 histology plus clear margins had 5-year LR ≤1.5% (n=821; LR, 0.6%; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.2%). Ten-year LR for this group was 2.2% (95% CI, 1.0%-3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic grade, age, margin status, and use of endocrine therapy identified 45% of a population-based cohort of female patients over age 50 with stage I breast cancer with a 5-year LR risk ≤1.5% after BCS plus RT. Prospective study is needed to evaluate the safety of omitting RT in patients with such a low risk of LR.

Local recurrence in women with stage I breast cancer: declining rates over time in a large, population-based cohort

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether local recurrence (LR) risk has changed over time among women with stage I breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Subjects were 5974 women aged ≥50 years diagnosis with pT1N0 breast cancer from 1989 to 2006, treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and LR outcomes were compared among 4 cohorts stratified by year of diagnosis: 1989 to 1993 (n=1077), 1994 to 1998 (n=1633), 1999 to 2002 (n=1622), and 2003 to 2006 (n=1642). Multivariable analysis was performed, with year of diagnosis as a continuous variable.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 8.6 years. Among patients diagnosed in 1989 to 1993, 1994 to 1998, 1999 to 2002, and 2003 to 2006, the proportions of grade 1 tumors increased (16% vs 29% vs 40% vs 39%, respectively, P<.001). Surgical margin clearance rates increased from 82% to 93% to 95% and 88%, respectively (P<.001). Over time, the proportions of unknown estrogen receptor (ER) status decreased (29% vs 10% vs 1.2% vs 0.5%, respectively, P<.001), whereas ER-positive tumors increased (56% vs 77% vs 86% vs 86%, respectively, P<.001). Hormone therapy use increased (23% vs 23% vs 62% vs 73%, respectively, P<.001), and chemotherapy use increased (2% vs 5% vs 10% vs 13%, respectively, P<.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence rates of LR over the 4 time periods were 2.8% vs 1.7% vs 0.9% vs 0.8%, respectively (Gray's test, P<.001). On competing risk multivariable analysis, year of diagnosis was significantly associated with decreased LR (hazard ratio, 0.92 per year, P=.0003). Relative to grade 1 histology, grades 2, 3, and unknown were associated with increased LR. Hormone therapy use was associated with reduced LR.

CONCLUSION

Significant changes in the multimodality management of stage I breast cancer have occurred over the past 2 decades. More favorable-risk tumors were diagnosed, and margin clearance and systemic therapy use increased. These changes contributed to the observed declining LR rates among patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Optimizing locoregional control and survival for women with breast cancer: a review of current developments in postmastectomy radiotherapy

For women who opt for mastectomy as primary surgery in breast cancer, indications for adjuvant radiotherapy are also being redefined in light of evidence demonstrating that postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), when given in conjunction with systemic therapy, improves, not only locoregional control, but also survival. However, in certain settings, particularly in patients wih intermediate-risk disease, and in some patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the role of PMRT remains controversial. Here, the authors review modern data pertaining to the benefits and risks of PMRT and discuss controversies related to the indications for PMRT, focusing on patients with T1-2 breast cancer with 0-3 positive nodes and patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. They also summarize key issues related to the integration of PMRT with other treatment modalities.

Interim cosmetic and toxicity results from RAPID: a randomized trial of accelerated partial breast irradiation using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To report interim cosmetic and toxicity results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT) with whole-breast irradiation (WBI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women age > 40 years with invasive or in situ breast cancer ≤ 3 cm were randomly assigned after breast-conserving surgery to 3D-CRT APBI (38.5 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily) or WBI (42.5 Gy in 16 or 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions ± boost irradiation). The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Secondary outcomes were cosmesis and toxicity. Adverse cosmesis was defined as a fair or poor global cosmetic score. After a planned interim cosmetic analysis, the data, safety, and monitoring committee recommended release of results. There have been too few IBTR events to trigger an efficacy analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2011, 2,135 women were randomly assigned to 3D-CRT APBI or WBI. Median follow-up was 36 months. Adverse cosmesis at 3 years was increased among those treated with APBI compared with WBI as assessed by trained nurses (29% v 17%; P < .001), by patients (26% v 18%; P = .0022), and by physicians reviewing digital photographs (35% v 17%; P < .001). Grade 3 toxicities were rare in both treatment arms (1.4% v 0%), but grade 1 and 2 toxicities were increased among those who received APBI compared with WBI (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

3D-CRT APBI increased rates of adverse cosmesis and late radiation toxicity compared with standard WBI. Clinicians and patients are cautioned against the use of 3D-CRT APBI outside the context of a controlled trial.

Coplanar versus noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning for fronto-temporal high-grade glioma

The purpose of this study was to compare dosimetric and radiobiological parameters of treatment plans using coplanar and noncoplanar beam arrangements in patients with fronto‐temporal high‐grade glioma (HGG) generated for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Ten cases of HGG overlapping the optic apparatus were selected. Four separate plans were created for each case: coplanar IMRT, noncoplanar IMRT (ncIMRT), VMAT, and noncoplanar VMAT (ncVMAT). The prescription dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Dose‐volume histograms and equivalent uniform doses (EUD) for planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) were generated. The four techniques resulted in comparable mean, minimum, maximum PTV doses, and PTV EUDs (p≥0.33). The mean PTV dose and EUD averaged for all techniques were 59.98 Gy (Standard Deviation (SD)±0.15) and 59.86 Gy (SD±0.27). Noncoplanar IMRT significantly reduced contralateral anterior globe EUDs (6.7 Gy versus 8.2 Gy, p=0.05), while both ncIMRT and ncVMAT reduced contralateral retina EUDs (16 Gy versus 18.8 Gy, p=0.03). Noncoplanar techniques resulted in lower contralateral temporal lobe dose (22.2 Gy versus 24.7 Gy). Compared to IMRT, VMAT techniques required fewer monitor units (755 vs. 478, p≤0.001) but longer optimization times. Treatment delivery times were 6.1 and 10.5 minutes for coplanar and ncIMRT versus 2.9 and 5.0 minutes for coplanar and ncVMAT. In this study, all techniques achieved comparable target coverage. Superior sparing of contralateral optic structures was seen with ncIMRT. The VMAT techniques reduced treatment delivery duration but prolonged plan optimization times, compared to IMRT techniques. Technique selection should be individualized, based on patient‐specific clinical and dosimetric parameters.

PACS number: 87

Limited M1 disease: a significant prognostic factor for stage IV breast cancer

PURPOSE

The prognosis of patients with breast cancer presenting with distant metastasis can vary depending on disease extent. This study evaluates a definition of limited M1 disease in association with survival in a cohort of women presenting with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 692 women referred to the BC Cancer Agency between 1996 and 2005 with M1 breast cancer at presentation. Limited M1 disease was defined as <5 metastatic lesions confined to one anatomic subsite. Extensive M1 disease was defined as ≥ 5 lesions or disease in more than one subsite. Clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared between subjects with limited (n = 233) versus extensive (n = 459) M1 disease. Multivariable analysis was performed by Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 1.9 years. Five-year Kaplan-Meier OS was significantly higher in patients with limited compared to extensive M1 disease (29.7 vs. 13.1 %, p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, limited M1 disease was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.51, 95 % confidence interval 0.40-0.66, p < 0.001). The only patient subsets with limited M1 disease with poor 5-year OS <15 % were patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥ 2 or estrogen receptor-negative status.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited M1 disease, defined as <5 metastatic lesions confined to one anatomic subsite, is a relevant favorable prognostic factor in patients with stage IV breast cancer. This definition may be used in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors to select patients for more aggressive systemic and locoregional treatments.

A debate on locoregional treatment of the primary tumor in patients presenting with stage IV breast cancer

Approximately 5-10% of patients with breast cancer present with distant metastasis (stage IV disease) at diagnosis. Systemic therapy is usually the main treatment for these patients. Other than in the context of palliation, the use of radical locoregional therapy, such as surgery or radiotherapy, is controversial. Recent studies have suggested that definitive locoregional treatment of the primary breast tumor can improve survival for patients presenting with metastatic breast cancer. This article reviews available literature pertaining to the benefits and disadvantages of locoregional treatment, focusing on data from institutional and registry studies. The effect of locoregional treatment on outcome for patients with stage IV breast cancer and related key issues will be discussed. Information on ongoing prospective randomized trials designed to address this issue will be provided.

Does the intent to irradiate the internal mammary nodes impact survival in women with breast cancer? A population-based analysis in British Columbia

PURPOSE

To determine the value of the intent to include internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in the radiation therapy (RT) volume for patients receiving adjuvant locoregional (breast or chest wall plus axillary and supraclavicular fossa) RT for breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

2413 women with node-positive or T3/4N0 invasive breast cancer, treated with locoregional RT from 2001 to 2006, were identified in a prospectively maintained, population-based database. Intent to include IMNs in RT volume was determined through review of patient charts and RT plans. Distant relapse free survival (D-RFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Prespecified pN1 subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 6.2 years. Forty-one percent of study participants received IMN RT. The 5-year D-RFS for IMN inclusion and exclusion groups were 82% vs. 82% (p = 0.82), BCSS was 87% vs. 87% (p = 0.81), and OS was 85% vs. 83% (p = 0.06). In the pN1 subgroup, D-RFS was 90% vs. 88% (p = 0.31), BCSS was 94% vs. 92% (p = 0.18), and OS was 91% vs. 88% (p = 0.01). After potential confounding variables were controlled for, women who received IMN RT did not have significantly different D-RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.24; p = 0.85), BCSS (HR = 0.98 (95% CI, 0.79-1.22; p = 0.88), or OS (HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.15; p = 0.57). In the pN1 subgroup, IMN RT was associated with trends for improved survival that were not statistically significant: D-RFS (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.63-1.22; p = 0.42), BCSS (HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57-1.25; p = 0.39), and OS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56-1.09; p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

After a median follow-up time of 6.2 years, although intentional IMN RT was not associated with a significant improvement in survival, this population-based study suggests that IMN RT may contribute to improved outcomes in selected patients with N1 disease.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer

Introduction

Infiltration of breast tumors by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has been associated with sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. However, it is unclear whether this is true within the estrogen receptor-alpha (ER)-negative subset of breast tumors that frequently manifest high TIL levels.

Methods

The association of TIL with short-term and long-term clinical response to anthracycline-based therapy was assessed in two independent ER-negative breast cancer cohorts in which patients were categorized as TIL-high or TIL-low. We defined an eight-gene lymphocyte mRNA expression signature (including CD19, CD3D, CD48, GZMB, LCK, MS4A1, PRF1, and SELL) and used unsupervised hierarchical clustering to examine the association between TIL and short-term response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a previously published cohort of ER-negative tumors (n = 113). We also examined the association between TIL and long-term chemotherapeutic efficacy in a second cohort of ER-negative tumors (n = 255) with longer than 6 years of median follow-up by using tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detection of CD3, CD8, CD4, CD20, and TIA-1.

Results

In patients with ER-negative tumors treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, pathologic complete responses (pCRs) were achieved by 23 (74%) of 31 TIL-high patients and 25 (31%) of 80 TIL-low patients (odds ratio (OR), 6.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.49 to 16.08; P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression with standard clinicopathologic features demonstrated that only tumor size (P = 0.037) and TIL status (P = 0.001) were independent predictors of anthracycline response. In the second cohort, adjuvant anthracycline-based therapy was associated with increased disease-free survival (DFS) only in patients with high levels of intraepithelial CD3⁺ TIL (P = 0.0023). In contrast, outcomes after CMF treatment (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) showed no association with CD3 status. In both cohorts, cytotoxic T-cells were the primary TIL subtype associated with anthracycline sensitivity. Finally, TIL significantly predicted anthracycline sensitivity for both the Her2-positive and triple-negative tumor phenotypes.

Conclusions

ER-negative breast cancers with high levels of TIL have heightened sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy, as assessed by the immediate response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term outcome following adjuvant therapy. Investigations of TIL-based predictive tests to identify patients likely to benefit from anthracycline-based treatments are warranted.

Intratumoral Immune Responses Can Distinguish New Primary and True Recurrence Types of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrences (IBTR)

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is an increasingly common clinical challenge. IBTRs include True Recurrences (TR; persistent disease) and New Primaries (NP; de novo tumors), but discrimination between these is difficult. We assessed tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TIL) as biomarkers for distinguishing these types of IBTR using primary tumors and matched IBTRs from 24 breast cancer patients, half of which were identified as putative TRs and half as NPs using a previously reported clinical algorithm. Intratumoral lymphocyte populations (CD3, CD8, CD4, CD25, FOXP3, TIA1, CD20) and macrophages (CD68) were quantified by immunohistochemistry in each tumor. Compared to matched primaries, TRs showed significant trends towards increased CD3(+) and CD8(+) TIL, while these populations were often diminished in NPs. Comparison of IBTRs showed that TRs had significantly higher levels of CD3(+) (P = 0.0136), CD8(+) (P = 0.0092), and CD25(+) (P = 0.0159) TIL than NPs. We conclude that TIL may be a novel diagnostic biomarker to distinguish NP from TR IBTRs.

Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy

PURPOSE

(1) To examine the effect of surgical margin status on local recurrence (LR) and survival following breast-conserving therapy; (2) To identify subsets with close or positive margins with high LR risk despite whole breast radiotherapy (RT) plus boost.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Subjects were 2,264 women with pT1-3, any N, M0 invasive breast cancer, treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast ± boost RT. Five-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LR, breast cancer-specific and overall survival (BCSS and OS) were compared between cohorts with negative (n = 1,980), close (n = 222), and positive (n = 62) margins. LR rates were analyzed according to clinicopathologic characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression modeling and matched analysis of close/positive margin cases and negative margin controls were performed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5.2 years. Boost RT was used in 92% of patients with close or positive margins. Five-year KM LR rates in the negative, close and positive margin cohorts were 1.3%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). BCSS and OS were similar in the three margin subgroups. In the close/positive margin cohort, LR rates were 10.2% with age <45 years, 11.8% with Grade III, 11.3% with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 26.3% with ≥4 positive nodes. Corresponding rates in the negative margin cohort were 2.3%, 2.4%, 1.0%, and 2.4%, respectively. On Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort, close or positive margin, Grade III histology, ≥4 positive nodes, and lack of systemic therapy were significantly associated with higher LR risk. When close/positive margin cases were matched to negative margin controls, the difference in 5-year LR remained significant (4.25% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

On univariable analysis, subsets with close or positive margins, in combination with age <45 years, Grade III, LVI, and ≥4 positive nodes, have 5-year LR >10% despite whole breast plus boost RT. These patients should be considered for more definitive surgery.