Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus: A Subgroup Analysis of the ADAPTABLE Trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) must be on the most effective dose of aspirin to mitigate risk of future adverse cardiovascular events.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

ADAPTABLE, an open-label, pragmatic study, randomized patients with stable, chronic ASCVD to 81 mg or 325 mg of daily aspirin. The effects of aspirin dosing was assessed on the primary effectiveness outcome, a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke, and the primary safety outcome of hospitalization for major bleeding. In this prespecified analysis, we used Cox proportional hazards models to compare aspirin dosing in patients with and without DM for the primary effectiveness and safety outcome.

RESULTS

Of 15,076 patients, 5,676 (39%) had DM of whom 2,820 (49.7%) were assigned to 81 mg aspirin and 2,856 (50.3%) to 325 mg aspirin. Patients with versus without DM had higher rates of the composite cardiovascular outcome (9.6% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001) and bleeding events (0.78% vs. 0.50%; P < 0.001). When comparing 81 mg vs. 325 mg of aspirin, patients with DM had no difference in the primary effectiveness outcome (9.3% vs. 10.0%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.98 [95% CI 0.83-1.16]; P = 0.265) or safety outcome (0.87% vs. 0.69%; subdistribution HR 1.25 [95% CI 0.72-2.16]; P = 0.772).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the inherently higher risk of patients with DM irrespective of aspirin dosing. Our findings suggest that a higher dose of aspirin yields no added clinical benefit, even in a more vulnerable population.

Aspirin Dosing for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Treated With P2Y12 Inhibitors

Background The ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness) was a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that found no difference between high- versus low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Whether concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor therapy modifies the effect of aspirin dose on clinical events remains unclear. Methods and Results Participants in ADAPTABLE were stratified according to baseline use of clopidogrel or prasugrel (P2Y12 group). The primary effectiveness end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and the primary safety end point was major bleeding requiring blood transfusions. We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the relative effectiveness and safety of aspirin dose within P2Y12 and non-P2Y12 groups. Of 13 815 (91.6%) participants with available data, 3051 (22.1%) were receiving clopidogrel (2849 [93.4%]) or prasugrel (203 [6.7%]) at baseline. P2Y12 inhibitor use was associated with higher risk of the primary effectiveness end point (10.86% versus 6.31%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 1.22-1.62]) but was not associated with bleeding (0.95% versus 0.53%; adjusted HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.91-2.22]). We found no interaction in the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Overall, dose switching or discontinuation was more common in the high-dose compared with low-dose aspirin group, but the pattern was not modified by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Conclusions In this prespecified analysis of ADAPTABLE, we found that the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin was not modified by baseline P2Y12 inhibitor use. Registration https://www.clinical.trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02697916.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of 2 aspirin doses in secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A subgroup analysis of ADAPTABLE

BACKGROUND

Among patients with established cardiovascular disease, the ADAPTABLE trial found no significant differences in cardiovascular events and bleeding rates between 81 mg and 325 mg of aspirin (ASA) daily. In this secondary analysis from the ADAPTABLE trial, we studied the effectiveness and safety of ASA dosing in patients with a history of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

ADAPTABLE participants were stratified based on the presence or absence of CKD, defined using ICD-9/10-CM codes. Within the CKD group, we compared outcomes between patients taking ASA 81 mg and 325 mg. The primary effectiveness outcome was defined as a composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke and the primary safety outcome was hospitalization for major bleeding. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to report differences between the groups.

RESULTS

After excluding 414 (2.7%) patients due to missing medical history, a total of 14,662 patients were included from the ADAPTABLE cohort, of whom 2,648 (18%) patients had CKD. Patients with CKD were older (median age 69.4 vs 67.1 years; P < .0001) and less likely to be white (71.5% vs 81.7%; P < .0001) when compared to those without CKD. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months, CKD was associated with an increased risk of both the primary effectiveness outcome (adjusted HR 1.79 [1.57, 2.05] P < .001 and the primary safety outcome (adjusted HR 4.64 (2.98, 7.21), P < .001 and P < .05, respectively) regardless of ASA dose. There was no significant difference in effectiveness (adjusted HR 1.01 95% CI 0.82, 1.23; P = .95) or safety (adjusted HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.52, 1.64; P = .79) between ASA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKD were more likely than those without CKD to have adverse cardiovascular events or death and were also more likely to have major bleeding requiring hospitalization. However, there was no association between ASA dose and study outcomes among these patients with CKD.

Importance of patient engagement in the conduct of pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trials: The ADAPTABLE experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Actively engaging patient partners in the conduct of trials is crucial to ensure the studies answer genuine, patient-centered, unmet clinical needs, and to facilitate participant recruitment and retention. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the feasibility of patient engagement within a large pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial, specifically for the purposes of dissemination of study information/updates and to favorize recruitment and retention.

METHODS

In the patient-centric, pragmatic ADAPTABLE randomized trial, transparent and timely dissemination of information on the study updates to the trial participants was undertaken to create meaningful engagement and to facilitate retention. A national panel of patient partners, the Adaptors, were directly involved in this information dissemination strategy, and study participants were engaged both nationally and locally to design recruitment methods iteratively during the conduct of the trial. All Adaptors had a lived experience with cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Adaptors attended bi-weekly meetings facilitated by the director of the study's patient-powered research network. They drafted and/or edited newsletters and ad hoc educational information written in a lay-friendly manner for study participants, which were regularly distributed to the ADAPTABLE community, in addition to online forums where participants could share their experience of their involvement in ADAPTABLE. To spur recruitment, a patient-driven initiative was to draft letters sharing their story, which were distributed by the local study teams. Patient partners thought that using patients' voice to provide their perspectives on why they believed this project was important would be more engaging for prospective participants than traditional approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

ADAPTABLE's experience has demonstrated the feasibility of engaging patients as partners in the conduct of a large-scale, multi-center, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Future trials should embrace and iteratively improve this model by engaging patient partners as early as study protocol development and funding applications, and quantify its impact on the effectiveness and value of the trial.

0854 A case of complete heart block in a patient with severe obstructive sleep apnea

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been associated with bradycardic arrythmias and cases of transient heart block. Heart block occurring during sleep has been described in up to 10% of patients with obstructive sleep apnea, most commonly during stage R sleep and through a mechanism known as vagal activation. Stage R sleep is associated with desynchronization of respiratory and cardiovascular functions, and the excessive autonomic response (vagal activation) occurs due to the stronger stimulation of chemoreceptors and baroreceptors induced by hypoxemia, intrathoracic pressure swings, and hemodynamic alterations. Treatment of the underlying sleep-disordered breathing will typically treat the bradycardic arrythmia as well.

Report of Cases: A 49-year-old male with a BMI of 30 kg/m , neck circumference of 16 inches, and obstructive sleep apnea presented to the sleep center to establish care for management of his preexisting OSA. He was previously diagnosed with moderate OSA in 2007 but had discontinued therapy shortly after due to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) intolerance. The patient complained of snoring, nocturia, and excessive daytime sleepiness (18/24 on Epworth Sleepiness Scale). During the split night study, the patient was noted to have 2:1 second degree heart block followed by a transient episode of complete heart block, manifested by 4 non-conducted p-waves. The patient remained asymptomatic throughout the night. Upon study completion, the patient denied any prior chest pain, presyncope, syncope, or medications that might cause heart block.

Conclusion

Bradyarrythmias can be seen in severe obstructive sleep apnea in the setting of excessive vagal stimulation through increased stimulation of chemoreceptors and baroreceptors. Treatment with PAP therapy can lead to prevention of heart block in 80-90% of these patients.

Support (If Any)

 

Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

The appropriate dose of aspirin to lower the risk of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke and to minimize major bleeding in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a subject of controversy.

METHODS

Using an open-label, pragmatic design, we randomly assigned patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to a strategy of 81 mg or 325 mg of aspirin per day. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of death from any cause, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. The primary safety outcome was hospitalization for major bleeding, also assessed in a time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15,076 patients were followed for a median of 26.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 19.0 to 34.9). Before randomization, 13,537 (96.0% of those with available information on previous aspirin use) were already taking aspirin, and 85.3% of these patients were previously taking 81 mg of daily aspirin. Death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke occurred in 590 patients (estimated percentage, 7.28%) in the 81-mg group and 569 patients (estimated percentage, 7.51%) in the 325-mg group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.14). Hospitalization for major bleeding occurred in 53 patients (estimated percentage, 0.63%) in the 81-mg group and 44 patients (estimated percentage, 0.60%) in the 325-mg group (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.77). Patients assigned to 325 mg had a higher incidence of dose switching than those assigned to 81 mg (41.6% vs. 7.1%) and fewer median days of exposure to the assigned dose (434 days [IQR, 139 to 737] vs. 650 days [IQR, 415 to 922]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pragmatic trial involving patients with established cardiovascular disease, there was substantial dose switching to 81 mg of daily aspirin and no significant differences in cardiovascular events or major bleeding between patients assigned to 81 mg and those assigned to 325 mg of aspirin daily. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; ADAPTABLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02697916.).

Rationale and Design of the Aspirin Dosing-A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) Trial

Importance

Determining the right dosage of aspirin for the secondary prevention treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains an unanswered and critical question.

Objective

To report the rationale and design for a randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal dosage of aspirin to be used for secondary prevention of ASCVD, using an innovative research method.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This pragmatic, open-label, patient-centered, randomized clinical trial is being conducted in 15 000 patients within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), a distributed research network of partners including clinical research networks, health plan research networks, and patient-powered research networks across the United States. Patients with established ASCVD treated in routine clinical practice within the network are eligible. Patient recruitment began in April 2016. Enrollment was completed in June 2019. Final follow-up is expected to be completed by June 2020.

Interventions

Participants are randomized on a web platform in a 1:1 fashion to either 81 mg or 325 mg of aspirin daily.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy end point is the composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for a nonfatal stroke. The primary safety end point is hospitalization for major bleeding associated with a blood-product transfusion. End points are captured through regular queries of the health systems' common data model within the structure of PCORnet's distributed data environment.

Conclusions and Relevance

As a pragmatic study and the first interventional trial conducted within the PCORnet electronic data infrastructure, this trial is testing several unique and innovative operational approaches that have the potential to disrupt and transform the conduct of future patient-centered randomized clinical trials by evaluating treatments integrated in clinical practice while at the same time determining the optimal dosage of aspirin for secondary prevention of ASCVD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697916.

Electrocardiomatrix Facilitates Accurate Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients

Background and Purpose- Cardiac telemetry is a routine part of inpatient ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack evaluation to assess for atrial fibrillation (AF). Yet, tools to assist stroke clinicians in the evaluation of the large quantities of telemetry data are limited. The investigators developed a new method to evaluate electrocardiographic signals, electrocardiomatrix, that was applied to stroke unit telemetry data to determine its feasibility, validity, and usefulness. Electrocardiomatrix displays telemetry data in a 3-dimensional matrix that allows for more accurate and less time consuming P-wave analysis. Methods- In this single-center, prospective, observational study conducted in a stroke unit, all telemetry data from ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients were collected (April 2017-January 2018) for examination facilitated by electrocardiomatrix. AF>30 seconds was identified through review of electrocardiomatrix-generated matrices by a nonphysician researcher. Electrocardiomatrix results were compared with the clinical team's medical record documentation of AF identified through telemetry. A study cardiologist reviewed the standard telemetry associated with all AF episodes identified by electrocardiomatrix and each case of disagreement. Results- Telemetry data (median 46 hours [interquartile range: 22-90]) were analyzed among 265 unique subjects (88% ischemic stroke). Electrocardiomatrix was successfully applied in 260 (98%) of cases. The positive predictive value of electrocardiomatrix compared with the clinical documentation was 86% overall and 100% among the subset with no prior history of AF. For the 5 false-positive and 5 false-negative cases, expert overview disagreed with the clinical documentation and confirmed the electrocardiomatrix-based diagnosis. Conclusions- The application of electrocardiomatrix to stroke unit-acquired telemetry data is feasible and appears to have superior accuracy compared with traditional monitor analysis by noncardiologists.

Surge of corticocardiac coupling in SHRSP rats exposed to forebrain cerebral ischemia

Sudden death is an important but underrecognized consequence of stroke. Acute stroke can disturb central control of autonomic function and result in cardiac dysfunction and sudden death. Previous study showed that bilateral common carotid artery ligation (BCCAL) in the spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone rat strain (SHRSP) is a well-established model for forebrain ischemic sudden death. This study aims to investigate the temporal dynamic changes in electrical activities of the brain and heart and functional interactions between the two vital organs following forebrain ischemia. EEG and ECG signals were simultaneously collected from nine SHRSP and eight Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. RR interval was analyzed to investigate the cardiac response to brain ischemia. EEG power and coherence (CCoh) analysis were conducted to study the cortical response. Corticocardiac coherence (CCCoh) and directional connectivity (CCCon) were analyzed to determine brain-heart connection. Heart rate variability (HRV) was analyzed to evaluate autonomic functionality. BCCAL resulted in 100% mortality in SHRSP within 14 h, whereas no mortality was observed in WKY rats. The functionality of both the brain and the heart were significantly altered in SHRSP compared with WKY rats after BCCAL. SHRSP, but not WKY rats, exhibited intermittent surge of CCCoh, which paralleled the elevated CCCon and reduced HRV, following the onset of ischemia until sudden death. Elevated brain-heart coupling invariably associated with the disruption of the autonomic nervous system and the risk of sudden death. This study may improve our understanding of the mechanism of forebrain ischemia-induced sudden death. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrates a marked surge of corticocardiac coupling in rats dying from focal cerebral ischemia, consistent with our earlier data in rats exposed to fatal asphyxia. Since the bidirectional electrical signal coupling (corticocardiac coherence) and communication (corticocardiac connectivity) between the brain and the heart are only identified in dying animals, they could be used as potential biomarkers to predict the risk of sudden death.

Accurate detection of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter using the electrocardiomatrix technique

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AFIB) and atrial flutter (AFL) are two common cardiac arrhythmias that predispose patients to serious medical conditions. There is a need to accurately detect these arrhythmias to prevent diseases and reduce mortality. Apart from accurately detecting these arrhythmias, it is also important to distinguish between AFIB and AFL due to differing clinical treatments.

METHODS

In this study, we applied a new technology, the electrocardiomatrix (ECM) invented in our lab, in detecting AFIB and AFL in human patients. ECM converts 2D ECG signals into a 3D color matrix, which renders arrhythmia detection intuitive, fast, and accurate. Using ECM, we analyzed the ECG signals from the online MIT-BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database (PhysioNet), and compared our ECM-based results to manual annotations based on ECG by physicians.

RESULTS

Results demonstrate that ECM and PhysioNet annotations of AFIB and AFL agree more than 99% of the time. The sensitivities of the ECM for AFIB and AFL detection were 99.2% and 98.0%, respectively, and the specificities of the ECM for AFIB and AFL were both at 99.8% and 99.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that ECM is a reliable method for accurate identification of AFIB and AFL.

Adrenergic Blockade Bi-directionally and Asymmetrically Alters Functional Brain-Heart Communication and Prolongs Electrical Activities of the Brain and Heart during Asphyxic Cardiac Arrest

Sudden cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in the United States. The neurophysiological mechanism underlying sudden death is not well understood. Previously we have shown that the brain is highly stimulated in dying animals and that asphyxia-induced death could be delayed by blocking the intact brain-heart neuronal connection. These studies suggest that the autonomic nervous system plays an important role in mediating sudden cardiac arrest. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of phentolamine and atenolol, individually or combined, in prolonging functionality of the vital organs in CO₂-mediated asphyxic cardiac arrest model. Rats received either saline, phentolamine, atenolol, or phentolamine plus atenolol, 30 min before the onset of asphyxia. Electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were simultaneously collected from each rat during the entire process and investigated for cardiac and brain functions using a battery of analytic tools. We found that adrenergic blockade significantly suppressed the initial decline of cardiac output, prolonged electrical activities of both brain and heart, asymmetrically altered functional connectivity within the brain, and altered, bi-directionally and asymmetrically, functional, and effective connectivity between the brain and heart. The protective effects of adrenergic blockers paralleled the suppression of brain and heart connectivity, especially in the right hemisphere associated with central regulation of sympathetic function. Collectively, our results demonstrate that blockade of brain-heart connection via alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockers significantly prolonged the detectable activities of both the heart and the brain in asphyxic rat. The beneficial effects of combined alpha and beta blockers may help extend the survival of cardiac arrest patients.

Sleep as an Activity of Daily Living and Improved Outcomes in Acute Care

Date Presented 4/9/2016

Occupational therapy sleep tool intervention demonstrates a positive effect on pain reduction associated with sleep deprivation. To improve patient outcomes, hospital-based occupational therapist roles should routinely include sleep education as part of their domain.

Primary Author and Speaker: Kristen Clore

Additional Authors and Speakers: Mary Whitehouse Barber, Melissa Johnson, Christelle David

Contributing Authors: Steven Heidt, Julia Meireles, Brittany Gappy, Bridget Higgy, Zainab Rasheed, Ryan Scott, Giancarlo Vanini, Peter Farrehi

Sleep-Enhancing Education Intervention Effect on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hospitalized Adults

Date Presented 4/8/2016

Simple sleep-enhancing education can significantly improve perceptions of sleep quality, wake disturbance, and fatigue in hospitalized adults. Occupational therapists have the opportunity to implement this education in their daily roles.

Primary Author and Speaker: Steven Heidt

Contributing Authors: J. Ryan Scott, Kristen Clore, Christelle David, Melissa Johnson, Brittany Gappy, Bridget Higgins, Zainab Rasheed, Julia Meireles, Peter Farrehi

Abstract 236: Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Comparing Exercise Tolerance, Cardiac Remodeling, Clinical and Genetic Data

Background: Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is estimated between 32% and 71%. Individuals with HCM and OSA have increased blood pressure, BMI, , ascending aorta size, left atrial size, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, E/e’ ratio, atrial fibrillation rates and NYHA functional class. It has been suggested that treatment of OSA can decrease the need for septal reduction. However, studies have found no effect of OSA on septal thickness or outflow gradient. It is not known how OSA affects exercise performance or cardiac remodeling assessed by MR. Genetic propensity toward OSA in HCM has not been reported. We propose that OSA predicts decrease exercise tolerance and that cardiac remodeling could be identified using MR. We sought to report on HCM genotype in OSA as well as compare our clinical and echo data with other investigators.

Methods: Subjects were identified through our institution’s HCM database. They were surveyed using the STOP-BANG (SB) questionnaire, a validated questionnaire to identify individuals at high risk for OSA. We stratified patients into high risk (HR) and low risk (LR) groups, based on a cut point of greater than or equal to 3 on SB. Demographics and clinical characteristics were extracted from our database. Prevalence and means were compared between the two groups, using Chi-square and t-tests. Differences between the groups were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI using linear mixed models for continuous measures and logistic regression for dichotomous measures.

Results: There were 206 respondents, of those 160 (78%) scored high risk for OSA, 60 of which had a history of polysomnogram (PSG) confirming OSA. Having a HR vs. LR SB was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of stroke, CHF hospitalization, NYHA functional class >2, reduced peak VO2, reduced anaerobic threshold and increased LA diameter. Adjusted comparisons for age, gender, and BMI showed that had significantly higher PAWP and LV mass index. Of those with a prior diagnosis of OSA we compared therapy compliant and non-compliant individuals and found they differed on LV mass index (HR=98.7 g/m2 vs. LR=62.0 g/m2, p=0.01).

Conclusions: OSA occurs frequently in HCM and is associated with decreased exercise tolerance, worse hemodynamics, poor outcome as well as increased LV mass, which may be attenuated by therapy. OSA is an important and modifiable risk factor in HCM. Prospective evaluation utilizing PSG based diagnosis and positive pressure therapy is warranted.