Impact of elevated lipoprotein(a) on coronary artery disease phenotype and severity

AIMS

A thorough characterization of the relationship between elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery disease (CAD) is lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the association of increasing Lp(a) levels and CAD severity in a real-world population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This non-interventional, cross-sectional, LipidCardio study included patients aged ≥21 years undergoing angiography (October 2016-March 2018) at a tertiary cardiology centre, who have at least one Lp(a) measurement. The association between Lp(a) and CAD severity was determined by synergy between PCI with taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX)-I and Gensini scores and angiographic characteristics. Overall, 975 patients (mean age: 69.5 years) were included; 70.1% were male, 97.5% had Caucasian ancestry, and 33.2% had a family history of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Median baseline Lp(a) level was 19.3 nmol/L. Patients were stratified by baseline Lp(a): 72.9% had < 65 nmol/L, 21.0% had ≥100 nmol/L, 17.2% had ≥125 nmol/L, and 12.9% had ≥150 nmol/L. Compared with the normal (Lp(a) < 65 nmol/L) group, elevated Lp(a) groups (e.g. ≥ 150 nmol/L) had a higher proportion of patients with prior CAD (48.4% vs. 62.7%; P < 0.01), prior coronary revascularization (39.1% vs. 51.6%; P = 0.01), prior coronary artery bypass graft (6.0% vs. 15.1%; P < 0.01), vessel(s) with lesions (68.5% vs. 81.3%; P = 0.03), diffusely narrowed vessels (10.9% vs. 16.5%; P = 0.01) or chronic total occlusion lesions (14.3% vs. 25.2%; P < 0.01), and higher median SYNTAX-I (3.0 vs. 5.5; P = 0.01) and Gensini (10.0 vs. 16.0; P < 0.01) scores.

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) was associated with a more severe presentation of CAD. Awareness of Lp(a) levels in patients with CAD may have implications in their clinical management.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) increases risk of subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and coronary revascularisation in incident ASCVD patients: A cohort study from the UK Biobank

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetic driver for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to provide novel insights into the associated risk of elevated versus normal Lp(a) levels on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in an incident ASCVD cohort.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of incident ASCVD patients. MACE counts and incidence rates (IRs) per 100-person-years were reported for patients with normal (<65 nmol/L) and elevated (>150 nmol/L) Lp(a) within the first year after incident ASCVD diagnosis and overall follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models quantified the risk of MACE associated with a 100 nmol/L increase in Lp(a).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 32,537 incident ASCVD patients; 5204 with elevated and 22,257 with normal Lp(a). Of those with elevated Lp(a), 41.2% had a subsequent MACE, versus 35.61% with normal Lp(a). Within the first year of follow-up, the IRs of composite MACE and coronary revascularisation were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with elevated versus normal Lp(a) (IR difference 6.79 and 4.66). This trend was also observed in the overall follow-up (median 4.7 years). Using time to first subsequent MACE, a 100 nmol/L increase in Lp(a) was associated with an 8.0% increased risk of composite MACE, and 18.6% increased risk of coronary revascularisation during the overall follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of elevated Lp(a) with increased risk of subsequent MACE and coronary revascularisation highlights a population who may benefit from earlier and more targeted intervention for cardiovascular risk including Lp(a), particularly within the first year after ASCVD diagnosis. Proactive Lp(a) testing as part of routine clinical practice can help identify and better manage these higher-risk individuals.

Burden of lipoprotein(a) for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A retrospective analysis from the United States

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an inherited, independent, and causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). OBJECTIVE: To assess the burden of elevated Lp(a) for patients with ASCVD in a real-world setting in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed US patients with available Lp(a) measurement and established ASCVD using Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart database (2007-2020). Index date was defined as the first diagnosis of an ASCVD event. Patient demographics, medications, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and occurrence of cardiovascular events were assessed for patients with elevated (≥150 nmol/L) vs normal (≥65 nmol/L) Lp(a) levels, within the first year of index date. HCRU was characterized by inpatient hospitalization, inpatient length of stay (LOS), outpatient visits, and emergency department (ED) visits. All comparative analyses of patients with elevated (≥150 nmol/L) vs normal (≥65 nmol/L) Lp(a) levels within the first year of index date were adjusted for age, sex, baseline statin use, and diabetes. RESULTS: 8,372 patients with ASCVD and Lp(a) measurement in nmol/L were included in this study. Patient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were similar among those with normal and elevated Lp(a). However, the proportion of patients receiving statins and β-blockers at baseline were significantly higher in the elevated vs normal Lp(a) group (54.76% vs 42.91%, P < 0.0001, and 30.92% vs 27.32%, P = 0.0183, respectively). At 1 year of follow-up, the rates per 100 person-years for ASCVD-related inpatient hospitalizations, outpatient hospitalizations, and ED visits were higher among patients with elevated Lp(a) compared with normal Lp(a) (13.33 vs 9.46, 89.08 vs 85.10, and 2.89 vs 2.29, respectively). The mean LOS per ASCVD-related hospitalization was 7.21 days in the elevated and 6.26 days in the normal Lp(a) group (P = 0.3462). During the 1-year post-index follow-up period, 15% of patients in the elevated Lp(a) group required revascularization compared with 10% of patients in the normal Lp(a) group (P = 0.0002). The odds of composite myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and revascularization occurrence of events within the first year of index was significantly higher in the elevated Lp(a) group compared with the normal Lp(a) group (1.46; 95% CI = 1.20-1.77; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HCRU within the first year of ASCVD diagnosis is substantial among patients with ASCVD and elevated Lp(a). Relatively higher rates of inpatient hospitalizations, increased LOS per hospitalization, and requirement of revascularization procedures within the first year of ASCVD index diagnosis were observed in patients with elevated Lp(a) compared with normal Lp(a) levels. Lp(a) testing in routine clinical practice could help in identification of high-risk patients with ASCVD and play an important role in the overall cardiovascular risk management, aiming to reduce the HCRU associated with ASCVD. DISCLOSURES: Ms Fonseca, Dr Laguna, Dr Itani, Dr Rachel Studer, and Dr Ferber are employees of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Ms Byrne is an employee of Novartis AG, Dublin, Ireland. Dr Costa-Scharplatz is an employee of Novartis Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden. Dr Heo and Ms Dillon are employees of Genesis Research. Genesis Research was commissioned to conduct the study (data extraction and analysis) on behalf of Novartis Pharma AG.

OUTSTEP-HF: randomised controlled trial comparing short-term effects of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on daily physical activity in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

OUTSTEP-HF compared the effect of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril on 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, non-sedentary daytime physical activity and heart failure (HF) symptoms in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ambulatory patients (n = 621) with stable symptomatic HFrEF were randomised 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan (n = 310) or enalapril (n = 311). Changes in physical activity and mean daily non-sedentary daytime activity from baseline to Week 12 were measured using 6MWT and a wrist-worn accelerometer device, respectively. After 12 weeks, 6MWT improved by 35.09 m with sacubitril/valsartan [97.5% confidence interval (CI) 27.85, 42.32] and by 26.11 m with enalapril (97.5% CI 18.78, 33.43); however, there was no significant difference between groups [least squares means treatment difference: 8.98 m (97.5% CI -1.31, 19.27); P = 0.0503]. Mean daily non-sedentary daytime activity decreased by 27 min with sacubitril/valsartan and by 21 min with enalapril [least squares means treatment difference: -6 min (97.5% CI -25.7, 13.4), P = 0.4769] after 12 weeks. 6MWT improved by ≥30 m in 51% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group vs. 44% of patients treated with enalapril (odds ratio 1.251, 95% CI 0.895, 1.748). At Week 4, non-sedentary daytime activity increased by ≥10% in 58% of patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan vs. 64% with enalapril; 58% of patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan reported improved HF symptoms as assessed by patient global assessment vs. 43% with enalapril. However, these differences did not persist at Week 12.

CONCLUSION

After 12 weeks of treatment, there was no significant benefit of sacubitril/valsartan on either 6MWT or daytime physical activity measured by actigraphy compared with enalapril.

A real-world assessment of the distribution of lipid levels across increasing lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with established cardiovascular disease in the United States

Background and purpose

Measurements of lipid levels are frequently used to assess the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), including future myocardium infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been established as an independent risk factor for developing CVD, however it is not widely measured. This real-world study assessed the distribution of lipid (Total Cholesterol [TC], low-density cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density cholesterol [HDL-C] and Triglycerides [TGs]) levels across different Lp(a) strata of patients with established CVD and at least one Lp(a) assessment.

Methods

This was a descriptive, non-interventional, retrospective cohort study of patients with established CVD and at least one Lp(a) assessment in the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset (2007–2019). The index date was defined as the date of the first established CVD (MI, ischemic stroke or peripheral artery disease diagnosis) in the identification period (1/1/2008–30/6/2018) following one-year continuous enrollment. Patients were followed for up to one year, until death or transfer out of the dataset, whichever occurred first.

Results

5,434 patients (55.5% males) with established CVD and at least one Lp(a) assessment having a mean (SD) age of 62.5 (12.6) years were evaluated. During the 12 months pre-index period, 49.9%, 46.1%, 48.1% and 49.8% of these patients had a measurement of TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TGs, respectively. Overall, the mean (SD) TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TGs levels were 182.1 (47.0) mg/dL [n=2,712], 102.6 (40.1) mg/dL [n=2,503], 52.7 (16.7) mg/dL [n=2,614], and 140.3 (108.8) mg/dL [n=2,707], respectively. More than half of these patients were treated with at least one lipid lowering drug (includes statins, ezetimibe, fibrates, niacin or PCSK9is) during the pre-index period. The mean (SD) levels of TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG in patients with Lp(a) &lt;30 mg/dL, 30–50] mg/dL, 50–70 mg/dL, 70–90 mg/dL and ≥90 mg/dL are presented in Figure 1.

Conclusions

Overall, no trends in the levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C or triglycerides were observed across increasing levels of lipoprotein(a). These findings suggest the measurement of lipoprotein(a) is required to ensure a complete characterization of a patient lipid profile.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG

Characteristics of patients with at least one lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] assessment and those with Lp(a) levels equal to or greater than 70 mg/dL: a real-world study in the US

Background and purpose

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The objective of this real-world study was to characterize the patients in the United States (US) that have an Lp(a) assessment and those with Lp(a) levels ≥70 mg/dL.

Methods

This is a descriptive, non-interventional, retrospective cohort study of patients with at least one Lp(a) assessment and one-year continuous enrollment prior to index date (first Lp(a) assessment in the identification period i.e. 1/1/2008–30/6/2019) using the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) dataset (2007–2019) in the US. Optum's longitudinal EHR repository include more than 700 Hospitals and 7000 Clinics; treating more than 95 million patients receiving care in the US.

Results

26,997 patients (50.8% females) with ≥1 Lp(a) assessment having a mean (SD) age of 52.6 (14.1) years were evaluated. Patient distribution across Lp(a) levels ≥30, ≥50, ≥70, and ≥90 mg/dL were 32.4%, 20.2%, 12.3%, and 6.6%, respectively. Patients with Lp(a) ≥70 mg/dL (N=3,314) had a mean (SD) age of 54.7 (13.2) years and 55.2% were female. The overall population that gets tested for Lp(a) and the subgroup of patients with Lp(a) ≥70 mg/dL had prior myocardial infarction (4.8% and 6.2%), prior ischemic stroke (2.2% and 2.5%), peripheral artery disease (6.7% and 8.4%), dyslipidaemia (72.6% and 80.9%), hypertension (53.0% and 60.9%), diabetes mellitus (23.5% and 26.8%) and chronic ischemic heart disease (19.6% and 24.6%) at index. The use of baseline medications included statins (37.3% and 49.1%), ACEi/ARBs (28.2% and 34.0%) and beta-blockers (19.0% and 23.6%) for the overall population and those patients with Lp(a) ≥70 mg/dL, respectively.

The mean (SD) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and total cholesterol levels were 109.8 (39.8) mg/dL [n=7,371], 138.3 (119.3) mg/dL [n=8,179] and 190.5 (46.8) mg/dL [n=8,181], respectively for overall population and 114.8 (41.5) mg/dL [n=980], 129.6 (80.5) mg/dL [n=1,063] and 195.9 (47.6) mg/dL [n=1,056] for patients with Lp(a) ≥70 mg/dL.

Conclusions

Of patients with an Lp(a) assessment in the US, more than 10% had Lp(a) levels ≥70 mg/dL. These patients were frequently diagnosed with dyslipidaemia and when reported showed elevated LDL-C and total cholesterol values. Further analyses are required to better understand any differences in patient characteristics and treatment of patients across Lp(a) levels.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma AG

Preclinical and Early Clinical Profile of a Highly Selective and Potent Oral Inhibitor of Aldosterone Synthase (CYP11B2)

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Primary hyperaldosteronism is a common cause of resistant hypertension. Aldosterone is produced in the adrenal by aldosterone synthase (AS, encoded by the gene CYP11B2). AS shares 93% homology to 11β-hydroxylase (encoded by the gene CYP11B1), responsible for cortisol production. This homology has hitherto impeded the development of a drug, which selectively suppresses aldosterone but not cortisol production, as a new treatment for primary hyperaldosteronism. We now report the development of RO6836191 as a potent (Ki 13 nmol/L) competitive inhibitor of AS, with in vitro selectivity >100-fold over 11β-hydroxylase. In cynomolgus monkeys challenged with synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone, single doses of RO6836191 inhibited aldosterone synthesis without affecting the adrenocorticotropic hormone–induced rise in cortisol. In repeat-dose toxicity studies in monkeys, RO6836191 reproduced the adrenal changes of the AS^−/− mouse: expansion of the zona glomerulosa; increased expression of AS (or disrupted green fluorescent protein gene in the AS^−/− mouse); hypertrophy, proliferation, and apoptosis of zona glomerulosa cells. These changes in the monkey were partially reversible and partially preventable by electrolyte supplementation and treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. In healthy subjects, single doses of RO6836191, across a 360-fold dose range, reduced plasma and urine aldosterone levels with maximum suppression at a dose of 10 mg, but unchanged cortisol, on adrenocorticotropic hormone challenge, up to 360 mg, and increase in the precursors 11-deoxycorticosterone and 11-deoxycortisol only at or >90 mg. In conclusion, RO6836191 demonstrates that it is possible to suppress aldosterone production completely in humans without affecting cortisol production.

New records of the Japanese seahorse Hippocampus mohnikei in Southeast Asia lead to updates in range, habitat and threats

New records of the Japanese seahorse Hippocampus mohnikei from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam, along with recently published studies from India and Singapore, have greatly expanded the known range of H. mohnikei within Southeast Asia. These new records reveal novel habitat preferences and threats to H. mohnikei in the region. Although the global conservation status of H. mohnikei is classified as Data Deficient according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, new sightings indicate that this species is found in similar habitats and faces similar threats as other Hippocampus species that are considered Vulnerable.

Definition of human apolipoprotein A-I epitopes recognized by autoantibodies present in patients with cardiovascular diseases

Autoantibodies to apolipoprotein A-I (anti-apoA-I IgG) have been shown to be both markers and mediators of cardiovascular disease, promoting atherogenesis and unstable atherosclerotic plaque. Previous studies have shown that high levels of anti-apoA-I IgGs are independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction. Autoantibody responses to apoA-I can be polyclonal and it is likely that more than one epitope may exist. To identify the specific immunoreactive peptides in apoA-I, we have developed a set of methodologies and procedures to isolate, purify, and identify novel apoA-I endogenous epitopes. First, we generated high purity apoA-I from human plasma, using thiophilic interaction chromatography followed by enzymatic digestion specifically at lysine or arginine residues. Immunoreactivity to the different peptides generated was tested by ELISA using serum obtained from patients with acute myocardial infarction and high titers of autoantibodies to native apoA-I. The immunoreactive peptides were further sequenced by mass spectrometry. Our approach successfully identified two novel immunoreactive peptides, recognized by autoantibodies from patients suffering from myocardial infarction, who contain a high titer of anti-apoA-I IgG. The discovery of these epitopes may open innovative prognostic and therapeutic opportunities potentially suitable to improve current cardiovascular risk stratification.

Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control

OBJECTIVE

Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for achieving BP control.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, 14-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various doses of valsartan +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ for maximizing BP control in 1,285 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with stage 1 hypertension and naïve to antihypertensive therapy (33.9%) started valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 2 hypertension (13.5%) or those uncontrolled on current antihypertensive monotherapy (52.6%) started valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg. At weeks 4, 8, and 11, patients not achieving BP control were up-titrated (maximum: valsartan 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg).

RESULTS

At study end, 78.8% of patients on valsartan +/- HCTZ were controlled (BP <140/90 mmHg) and still on study medication versus 67.8% on amlodipine +/- HCTZ (P < 0.0001). Amlodipine-treated patients had a higher incidence of peripheral edema (22.4% vs 2.2%) and associated discontinuations (7.3% vs <1%). Initiating therapy earlier with valsartan/HCTZ, rather than titrating monotherapy to its maximum dose before adding a second agent, was superior to amlodipine monotherapy or amlodipine +/- HCTZ for achieving BP control, and avoided excessive treatment adjustments and maintained tolerability.

Combination therapy with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide at doses up to 320/25 mg improves blood pressure levels in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled by valsartan 320 mg monotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of valsartan (Val) 320 mg once daily (o.d.), Val/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 320/12.5 mg o.d. and Val/HCTZ 320/25 mg o.d. in patients with hypertension not adequately controlled by Val monotherapy.

METHODS

This double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized trial recruited patients > or =18 years with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, defined as mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) of > or =95 mmHg and <110 mmHg without treatment. After washout, 3805 eligible patients received Val 320 mg o.d. single-blind for 4 weeks. Subsequently, patients with MSDBP > or =90 and <110 mmHg (n=2702) were randomized to double-blind treatment with Val 320 mg, Val/HCTZ 320/12.5 mg or Val/HCTZ 320/25 mg for 8 weeks. Mean changes in MSDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP) from the start of the single-blind period were analysed, as well as the proportion of responders (MSDBP <90 mmHg or > or =10 mmHg decrease from the start of the double-blind period). Tolerability and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

Reductions in MSDBP and MSSBP were observed in all groups. Both combinations were associated with significantly greater reductions than monotherapy for MSDBP and MSSBP at Weeks 8 and 12 (all p<0.0001). Both combinations also resulted in significantly greater proportion of responders at study end (74.9% and 68.8% for Val/HCTZ 320/25 mg and Val/HCTZ 320/12.5 mg, respectively) than monotherapy (52.7%; both p < 0.0001). In addition, a dose-response was observed with increasing dose of HCTZ with respect to MSSBP. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination ofVal and HCTZ at doses of 320/12.5 mg and 320/25 mg increases antihypertensive efficacy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with Val 320 mg monotherapy, without compromising tolerability.

Public health value of fixed-dose combinations in hypertension

It is well documented that reducing blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive individuals reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Despite this, many patients with hypertension remain untreated or inadequately treated, and fail to reach the recommended BP goals. Suboptimal BP control, whilst arising from multiple causes, is often due to poor patient compliance and/or persistence, and results in a significant health and economic burden on society. The use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for the treatment of hypertension has the potential to increase patient compliance and persistence. When compared with antihypertensive monotherapies, FDCs may also offer equivalent or better efficacy, and the same or improved tolerability. As a result, FDCs have the potential to reduce both the CV event rates and the non-drug healthcare costs associated with hypertension. When FDCs are adopted for the treatment of hypertension, issues relating to copayment, formulary restrictions and therapeutic reference pricing must be addressed.

Valsartan improves arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes independently of blood pressure lowering

Increased arterial stiffness, as estimated from aortic pulse wave velocity (Ao-PWV), and albuminuria are independent predictors for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Whether angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), drugs with cardio-renal protective effects, improve Ao-PWV to a greater extent than other equipotent antihypertensive medications remains unclear. After a 4-week washout phase, we compared the effects of valsartan (n=66), an ARB, with that of amlodipine (n=65), a calcium channel blocker on Ao-PWV in 131 T2DM patients with pulse pressure (PP) >or=60 mm Hg and raised albumin excretion rate (AER) in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg/d was added to valsartan 160 mg and amlodipine 5 mg/od uptitrated to 10 mg/od after 4 weeks to ensure equivalent BP control. After 24 weeks brachial and central aortic PP had fallen to a similar extent with attained mean (SD) brachial and central PP of 61.6 (13.6) and 47.3 (14.1) mm Hg in the valsartan/HCTZ group and 61.5 (12.2) and 47.3 (9.9) mm Hg in the amlodipine group, respectively. Ao-PWV showed a significantly greater reduction, mean (95% CI), -0.9 m/s (-1.4 to -0.3) for valsartan/HCTZ compared to amlodipine (P=0.002). AER fell significantly only with Val/HCTZ from 30.8(20.4, 46.5) to 18.2(12.5, 26.3) mcg/min, (P=0.01) with between treatment difference in favor of Val/HCTZ of -15.3mcg/min (P<0.001). Changes in AER and Ao-PWV were not correlated. Valsartan/HCTZ improves arterial stiffness and AER to a significantly greater extent than amlodipine despite similar central and brachial BP control. These 2 effects, which appear independent of each other, may explain the specific cardio-renal protective properties of ARBs.

Genetic variation of the platelet- surface integrin GPIIb-IIIa (PIA1/A2-SNP) shows a high association with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The gene encoding the beta(3)-subunit (GPIIIa) of the platelet alpha(2)beta(3)-integrin (fibrinogen receptor) shows a polymorphism PlA1/A2 with the A2 allele putatively associated with an increased risk of acute ischaemic events. This study investigated whether Type 2 diabetes as a particular macrovascular risk factor associates with the thrombogenic PIA2 genotype.

METHODS

The PlA genotype was determined in 112 consecutive Type 2 diabetic patients additionally classified according to the presence of macrovascular disease. Forty-four non-diabetic patients with angiografically documented cardiovascular disease (CAD/ AMI) and a further 59 non-diabetic subjects with no angiografical signs of CAD were investigated as genomic background control (n=103). PIA-genotyping was carried out by standard restriction fragment length analysis (RFLA) of PCR amplified lymphocyte template DNA.

RESULTS

The overall allelic PlA2- prevalence accounted to 34.8% (39/112) in diabetic patients as compared to 14.6% (15/103) in non-diabetic patients [OR 3.1 (1.6-6.1), p<0.01]. This odds ratio increased to 7.0 (2.5-19.7), (p<0.01) in subjects free of criteria of macrovascular disease. In non-diabetic control subjects without CAD there was an allelic PIA2 frequency of 10.2% (6/59) as compared to 20.5% (9/44) in patients with CAD and a history of AMI being less than either diabetes subgroup. The PIA2 prevalence in the subgroup of diabetes patients with macrovascular complications did not differ from the respective value in patients without macrovascular disease. [29.0% (20/69) vs. 44.2% (19/43)].

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

This study confirms a trendwise association of PlA2 with severe coronary artery disease, but rather suggests an even stronger, highly significant association with the metabolic condition of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. This justifies the speculation that pathways dependent on the platelet alpha(2)beta(3) integrin physiology could be implicated in the pathogenesis of Type 2 diabetes which lends further support to the "common soil" hypothesis of diabetes and vascular disease.

Macrovascular disease in diabetes: current status

Clearly, macrovascular complications are the prognosis limiting problem of diabetes patients which consecutively account for the majority of socio-economic burden of the disease. The overall morbidity and mortality development does not indicate improvement hallmarking better or at least adequate care for these patients. Possible explanations address the late detection problem of a clinically silent disease onset as well as unrecognised multiple comorbid conditions all of which end-up with endothelial dysfunction as representation of the so called "functional atherosclerosis" and blood hyperresponsiveness. Here, we describe new experimental aspects of the early atherosclerosis development focussing inflammation as one driving pathogenetic force for the evolution of the complicated lesion type in diabetes. However, emphasis is put on the view that inflammation, atherogenesis and thrombogenesis are severely crosslinked by soluble and cellular adhesion molecules. From a diagnostic point of view genomic detection of risk associated genes opens both the vision of early identification of high risk individuals and the targeting of drug intervention based on conditioned responsiveness. By using available drugs and evidence based risk factor intervention strategies a plea is made for a multimodal therapeutic approach fitted to the individual patient's needs aiming at endpoint reduction. This corresponds to the recent releases of guidelines from nearly all vascular medicine related scientific societies. Diabetes is a vascular disease!

Combination of hydrochlorothiazide or benazepril with valsartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to valsartan alone

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this open multicentric study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the addition of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (benazepril, 10 mg/day) or a diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg/day) for 4 weeks in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension having been treated for 4 weeks by an angiotensin II antagonist (valsartan, 80 mg/day) but still having a diastolic blood pressure (BP) > 90 mmHg on this medication given alone.

METHODS

A total of 327 patients were included in the trial and 153 patients (46%) had their diastolic BP </= 90 mmHg after 4 weeks of valsartan monotherapy. These patients continued the same treatment regimen for the next 4 weeks, but no further blood pressure reduction was observed. The remaining patients were randomized to either the valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide or the valsartan-benazepril combination.

RESULTS

The two combinations induced an additional significant BP reduction, which was of similar magnitude for diastolic BP (-4.5 during valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide treatment and -3.3 mmHg during valsartan-benazepril treatment), but of greater magnitude for systolic BP during valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide (-6.77 mmHg) than during valsartan-benazepril co-administration (-3.2 mmHg). At the end of the trial, the BP of the responders to the valsartan monotherapy was lower than that of patients having required a combination therapy. Valsartan given alone or in association with hydrochlorothiazide or benazepril was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

These data therefore show that in patients not responding sufficiently to angiotensin II receptor blockade BP can be further and safely lowered by adding a small dose of a diuretic or an ACE inhibitor, with the diuretic-containing combination tending to being more effective in controlling systolic BP.

High dose supplementation of RRR-alpha-tocopherol decreases cellular hemostasis but accelerates plasmatic coagulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased generation of free oxygen radicals and depleted scavenging potential (oxidative stress), leading to increased LDL oxidation and platelet hyperreactivity, the major components of atherothrombotic vascular lesions. A main goal of antioxidant therapy is to protect the LDL particle from atherogenic oxidation and to reduce the activated cellular hemostasis.

METHODS

We evaluated the influence of a high dose supplementation with 800 IU of the natural antioxidant RRR-alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) per day for six months on serum levels, vitamin E load of LDL particles (HPLC), lag phase of LDL oxidation (Esterbauer's assay), platelet adhesion molecules, leukocyte-platelet coaggregation (flow cytometry, D-III protocol) and coagulation (INR/PTT) in a group of 36 patients with type 2 diabetes (f/m 22/14; age 58+/-8.0; HbA1 at baseline 10.25+/-1.7).

RESULTS

Average vitamin E levels increased 2.65-fold accompanied by a 1.83-fold increase of LDL-associated vitamin E and a 12.3 min prolongation of the lag-phase of LDL oxidation (p<0.001 for all parameters at six months). Platelet expression of PECAM-1 (CD31) (-30.2% positive cells, p<0.001; antigen density -25%, p<0.001), ICAM-2 (CD102) (-2.9% positive cells, p<0.01; antigen density -10.6%, p<0.001) and fibrinogen (-1.6% positive cells, p<0.001; antigen density - 16.1 %, p<0.001) decreased. Concomitantly, platelet-leukocyte-coaggregation increased by 44% (p<0.001), correlating to an INR reduction of 10.4% (1.06+/-0.09 to 0.95+/-0.09, p<0.001, r = - 0.34). The PTT remained constant.

CONCLUSION

The antioxidant protection from the increased vitamin E was accompanied by a decreased expression of constitutive and function-dependent platelet adhesion molecules. However, increases in platelet-leukocyte coaggregates and a shortened INR time suggest extrinsic coagulation activation, possibly by induction of a leukocyte tissue factor dependent mechanism. High dose supplements of alpha-tocopherol may override the available redox balance in well controlled type 2 diabetes. However, intrinsic effects of alpha-tocopherol must be discussed.

Binding of contactin/F11 to the fibronectin type III domains 5 and 6 of tenascin is inhibited by heparin

The structural basis for the interaction between tenascin-C and the neuronal cell adhesion molecule, contactin/F11, was investigated using plasmon surface resonance technology. The binding site on tenascin-C for contactin/F11 is shown to span the two fibronectin type III homology domains 5 and 6. Either domain alone is insufficient for binding. Heparin, heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate inhibit this interaction through binding to a conserved heparin-binding site on domain 5. In contrast, chondroitin sulfates A and C have no such effect.