1
|
Bougas N, Allodji RS, Fayech C, Haddy N, Mansouri I, Journy N, Demoor C, Allard J, Thebault E, Surun A, Pacquement H, Pluchart C, Bondiau PY, Berchery D, Laprie A, Boussac M, Jackson A, Souchard V, Vu-Bezin G, Dufour C, Valteau-Couanet D, de Vathaire F, Fresneau B, Dumas A. Surveillance after childhood cancer: are survivors with an increased risk for cardiomyopathy regularly followed-up? Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1298-1305. [PMID: 37604931 PMCID: PMC10575933 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02400-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to study adherence to cardiac screening in long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS) at high risk of cardiomyopathy. METHODS This study involved 976 5-year CCS at high risk for cardiomyopathy from the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Determinants of adherence to recommended surveillance were studied using multivariable logistic regression models. Association of attendance to a long-term follow-up (LTFU) visit with completion of an echocardiogram was estimated using a Cox regression model. RESULTS Among participants, 32% had an echocardiogram within the 5 previous years. Males (adjusted RR [aRR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86), survivors aged 36-49 (aRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98), Neuroblastoma (aRR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.91) and CNS tumour survivors (aRR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.89) were less likely to adhere to recommended surveillance. Attendance to an LTFU visit was associated with completion of an echocardiogram in patients who were not previously adherent to recommendations (HR 8.20, 95% CI 5.64-11.93). CONCLUSIONS The majority of long-term survivors at high risk of cardiomyopathy did not adhere to the recommended surveillance. Attendance to an LTFU visit greatly enhanced the completion of echocardiograms, but further interventions need to be developed to reach more survivors.
Collapse
Grants
- Institut National Du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute)
- This study was supported by the INCa/ARC foundation (CHART project). The FCCSS cohort is supported and funded by the French Society of Cancer in Children and adolescents (SFCE), the Gustave Roussy Foundation (Pediatric Program “Guérir le Cancer de l’Enfant”), the Foundation ARC (POPHarC program) and The French National Research Agency (ANR, HOPE-EPI project), the ‘Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer’, and the ‘Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique’.
- This work was supported by the INCa/ARC foundation (CHART project). The FCCSS cohort is supported and funded by the French Society of Cancer in Children and adolescents (SFCE), the Gustave Roussy Foundation (Paediatric Program “Guérir le Cancer de l’Enfant”), the Foundation ARC (POPHarC program) and The French National Research Agency (ANR, HOPE-EPI project), the ‘Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer’, and the ‘Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique’.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Bougas
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm, ECEVE UMR 1123, F-75010, Paris, France.
| | - Rodrigue S Allodji
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Chiraz Fayech
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Villejuif, F-94805, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Imene Mansouri
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Neige Journy
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Demoor
- SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Julie Allard
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Villejuif, F-94805, France
| | - Eric Thebault
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Department of Tumor Pediatrics, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Aurore Surun
- SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Pacquement
- SIREDO Oncology Center (Care, Innovation and Research for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Claire Pluchart
- Institut de Cancérologie Jean Godinot, F-51100, Reims, France
| | | | - Delphine Berchery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Institute of Cancer Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Institute of Cancer Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Marjorie Boussac
- Santé publique France, the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France
- French National Health Insurance (Cnam), Paris, France
| | - Angela Jackson
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent Souchard
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Giao Vu-Bezin
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Christelle Dufour
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Villejuif, F-94805, France
| | - Dominique Valteau-Couanet
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Villejuif, F-94805, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Villejuif, F-94805, France
| | - Agnès Dumas
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm, ECEVE UMR 1123, F-75010, Paris, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, F-94805, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lach M, Otto J, Bondiau PY, Boulahssass R, Schiappa R, Jazmati D, von Krüchten R, Martin N, Doyen J. Safety and efficacy of two-drug combination in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and validation of the Charlson Index as a predictor of survival. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15:3764-3775. [PMID: 37559621 PMCID: PMC10407508 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best platinum-based chemotherapy regimen remains to be determined in elderly patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Predictive indexes for toxicity and survival are also needed to give the safest and most effective treatment for this population. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC NSCLC over 70 years of age, treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were included. Patients from two cancer centers treated between 12/2006 and 08/2019 were included in the data analysis. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 76.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 71.6-83.4]. Thirty-nine patients were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy and 19 with a sequential strategy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted in a combination of platinum and taxanes. At a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR: 7-69), the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.5% and 66.9%, respectively. Male sex and a high Charlson index were identified as independent prognostic factors for worse OS. Acute grade 3-5 toxicities occurred in 34.4% of patients, including 1 grade 5 toxicity, and grade 3-4 late toxicities occurred in 17.2% of patients. In the whole cohort a high Charlson index was the only predictive factor for a higher risk of grade 3-5 acute toxicities (statistical trend in the concurrent cohort, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS The Charlson index correlated with toxicity and survival in elderly patients treated with chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC. The addition of taxanes to platinum chemotherapy was safe in the present study and warrants further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Lach
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| | - Josiane Otto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| | - Rabia Boulahssass
- Geriatric Coordination Unit for Geriatric Oncology (UCOG) PACA Est, CHU of Nice, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| | - Danny Jazmati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Ricarda von Krüchten
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nicolas Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| | - Jérôme Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delacourt L, Allodji R, Chappat J, Haddy N, El-Fayech C, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Journy N, Bolle S, Thomas-Teinturier C, Zidane M, Rubino C, Veres C, Vu-Bezin G, Berchery D, Pluchart C, Bondiau PY, Dumas A, Bougas N, Grill J, Dufour C, Fresneau B, Pacquement H, Diallo I, Doz F, de Vathaire F. Risk factors for obesity in adulthood among survivors of childhood cancer. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2023. [PMID: 37318080 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for obesity in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). METHODS The study included 3199 patients of the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort, with 303 patients with obesity who had returned the self-questionnaire. Analyses were adjusted for social deprivation index and sex. RESULTS CCSs were less likely to have obesity (9.5%; 95% CI: 8.5%-10.5%) than expected from the general French population rates (12.5%; p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, brain tumor survivors were significantly more likely to develop obesity than the general French population (p = 0.0001). Compared with patients who did not receive radiotherapy to the pituitary gland, those who received a dose >5 Gy had an increased risk of obesity: relative risk 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2-3.1), 2.5 (95% CI: 1.7-3.7), and 2.6 (95% CI: 1.6-4.3), respectively, for participants with 6 to 20 Gy, 20 to 40 Gy, and ≥40 Gy of radiation. Etoposide administration significantly increased the risk of obesity (relative risk 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.6). High social deprivation index was also a risk factor, just like BMI at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Long-term follow-up of CCSs should include weight follow-up during adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurène Delacourt
- SIREDO Center (Care, Innovation, Research in Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Rodrigue Allodji
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Juliette Chappat
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- Department of Supportive Care, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Neige Journy
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cécile Thomas-Teinturier
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes AP-HP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Monia Zidane
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Rubino
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Giao Vu-Bezin
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Claire Pluchart
- Pediatric Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Reims, France
| | | | - Agnès Dumas
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Jacques Grill
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Inserm U981, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Brice Fresneau
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Hélène Pacquement
- SIREDO Center (Care, Innovation, Research in Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Inserm U1030, Villejuif, France
| | - François Doz
- SIREDO Center (Care, Innovation, Research in Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Department of Research, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benzaquen J, Bondiau PY, Otto J, Marquette CH, Berthet JP, Naghavi AO, Schiappa R, Hannoun-Levi JM, Padovani B, Doyen J. Comparison of outcome after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of patients with metachronous lung versus primary lung cancer. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:97. [PMID: 37287020 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02286-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-stage lung cancer, primarily treated with surgery, often occur in poor surgical candidates (impaired respiratory function, prior thoracic surgery, severe comorbidities). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive alternative that provides comparable local control. This technique is particularly relevant for surgically resectable metachronous lung cancer, in patients unable to undergo surgery.. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with SABR for stage I metachronous lung cancer (MLC) versus stage I primary lung cancer (PLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS 137 patients treated with SABR for stage I non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed, of which 28 (20.4%) were MLC and 109 (79.6%) were PLC. Cohorts were evaluated for differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival, local control (LC), and toxicity. RESULTS After SABR, patients treated for MLC have comparable median age (76.6 vs 78.6, p = 0.2), 3-year LC (83.6% vs. 72.6%, p = 0.2), PFS (68.7% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.9), and OS (78.6% vs. 52.1%, p = 0.9) as PLC, along with similar rates of total (54.1% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.6) and grade 3 + toxicity (3.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.9). Previous treatment of MLC patients was either surgery (21/28, 75%) or SABR (7/28, 25%). The median follow-up was 53 months. CONCLUSION SABR is a safe and effective approach for localized metachronous lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Benzaquen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Nice University Hospital, Pasteur Hospital, FHU OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 30, Voie Romaine, 06000, Nice, France.
- CNRS, INSERM, Institute of Research On Cancer and Aging, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France.
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Josiane Otto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Charles-Hugo Marquette
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Nice University Hospital, Pasteur Hospital, FHU OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 30, Voie Romaine, 06000, Nice, France
- CNRS, INSERM, Institute of Research On Cancer and Aging, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Berthet
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nice University Hospital, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Bernard Padovani
- Department of Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France
| | - Jérôme Doyen
- CNRS, INSERM, Institute of Research On Cancer and Aging, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li G, Xia YF, Huang YX, Okat D, Qiu B, Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Benezery K, Gao J, Qian CN. Better preservation of erectile function in localized prostate cancer patients with modern proton therapy: Is it cost-effective? Prostate 2022; 82:1438-1446. [PMID: 35915875 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has gradually been recognized as favorable curative treatment for localized prostate cancer (PC). However, the high rate of erectile dysfunction (ED) after traditional photon-based SBRT remains an ongoing challenge that greatly impacts the quality of life of PC survivors. Modern proton therapy allows higher conformal SBRT delivery and has the potential to reduce ED occurrence but its cost-effectiveness remains uninvestigated. METHODS A Markov decision model was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of proton SBRT versus photon SBRT in reducing irradiation-related ED. Base-case evaluation was performed on a 66-year-old (median age of PC) localized PC patient with normal pretreatment erectile function. Further, stratified analyses were performed for different age groups (50, 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 years) and threshold analyses were conducted to estimate cost-effective scenarios. A Chinese societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (37,653 US dollars [$])/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) was adopted. RESULTS For the base case, protons provided an additional 0.152 QALY at an additional cost of $7233.4, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $47,456.5/QALY. Protons was cost-effective for patients ≤62-year-old at the WTP of China (≤66-year-old at a WTP of $50,000/QALY; ≤73-year-old at a WTP of $100,000/QALY). For patients at median age, once the current proton cost ($18,000) was reduced to ≤$16,505.7 or the patient had a life expectancy ≥88 years, protons were cost-effective at the WTP of China. CONCLUSIONS Upon assumption-based modeling, the results of current study support the use of proton SBRT in younger localized PC patients who are previously potent, for better preservation of erectile function. The findings await further validation using data from future comparative clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yi-Xiang Huang
- Department of Health Management, Public Health Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Deniz Okat
- Department of Finance, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
- Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
- Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
- Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Jin Gao
- Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li G, Xia YF, Huang YX, Okat D, Qiu B, Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Benezery K, Gao J, Qian CN. Cost-effectiveness of using protons for breast irradiation aiming at minimizing cardiotoxicity: A risk-stratification analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:938927. [PMID: 36091675 PMCID: PMC9452743 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.938927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Incidental exposure of the heart to ionizing irradiation is associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease and subsequent fatality in patients with breast cancer after radiotherapy. Proton beam therapy can limit the heart dose in breast irradiation to a negligible level. However, compared with conventional photon modality, proton breast irradiation is more expensive. In this study, we performed cost-effectiveness analyses to identify the type of patients who would be more suitable for protons. Methods A Markov decision model was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of protons vs. photons in reducing the risk of irradiation-related ischemic heart disease. A baseline evaluation was performed on a 50-year-old woman patient without the preexisting cardiac risk factor. Furthermore, risk-stratification analyses for photon mean heart dose and preexisting cardiac risk were conducted on 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old women patients under different proton cost and willingness-to-pay (WTP) settings. Results Using the baseline settings, the incremental effectiveness (protons vs. photons) increased from 0.043 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to 0.964 QALY when preexisting cardiac risk increased to 10 times its baseline level. At a proton cost of 50,000 US dollars ($), protons could be cost-effective for ≤ 60-year-old patients with diabetes and ≤50-year-old patients with grade II–III hypertension at the WTP of China ($37,653/QALY); for ≤ 60-year-old patients with diabetes and ≤ 50-year-old patients with grade II–III hypertension or ≥ 2 major cardiac risk factors at a WTP of $50,000/QALY; and for ≤ 60-year-old patients with diabetes, grade II–III hypertension or ≥ 2 major cardiac risk factors and ≤ 50-year-old patients with total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dL at a WTP of $100,000/QALY. Conclusion Patients' preexisting cardiac risk status was a key factor affecting the cardiac benefits gained from protons and should therefore be a major consideration for the clinical decision of using protons; cost-effective scenarios of protons exist in those patients with high risk of developing cardiac diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Xiang Huang
- Department of Health Management, Public Health Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Deniz Okat
- Department of Finance, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
- Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
- Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
- Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Jin Gao
- Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Chao-Nan Qian ;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li G, Xia YF, Huang YX, Okat D, Qiu B, Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Benezery K, Gao J, Qian CN. Intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy as a radical treatment modality for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Head Neck 2021; 44:431-442. [PMID: 34837286 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to conventional intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy (IMRT), intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT) has potential to reduce irradiation-induced late toxicities while maintaining excellent tumor control in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the relevant cost-effectiveness remains controversial. METHODS A Markov decision tree analysis was performed under the assumption that IMPT offered normal tissue complication probability reduction (NTCP reduction) in long-term dysphagia, xerostomia, and hearing loss, compared to IMRT. Base-case evaluation was performed on T2N2M0 NPC of median age (43 years old). A Chinese societal willingness-to-pay threshold (33558 US dollars [$])/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) was adopted. RESULTS For patients at median age and having NTCP reduction of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%, their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $102684.0/QALY, $43161.2/QALY, $24134.7/QALY, $13991.6/QALY, $8259.8/QALY, and $4436.1/QALY, respectively; IMPT should provide an NTCP reduction of ≥24% to be considered cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS IMPT has potential to be cost-effective for average Chinese NPC patients and should be validated clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Xiang Huang
- Department of Health Management, Public Health Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Deniz Okat
- Department of Finance, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, Nice, France
| | - Jin Gao
- Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li G, Xia YF, Huang YX, Okat D, Qiu B, Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Benezery K, Gao J, Qian CN. Optimizing oropharyngeal cancer management by using proton beam therapy: trends of cost-effectiveness. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:944. [PMID: 34419008 PMCID: PMC8380358 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08638-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a new-emerging cancer treatment in China but its treatment costs are high and not yet covered by Chinese public medical insurance. The advanced form of PBT, intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT), has been confirmed to reduce normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) as compared to conventional intensity-modulated photon-radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Herein, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness and applicability of IMPT versus IMRT for OPC patients in China, aiming at guiding the proper use of PBT. Methods A 7-state Markov model was designed for analysis. Base-case evaluation was performed on a 56-year-old (median age of OPC in China) patient under the assumption that IMPT could provide a 25% NTCP-reduction in long-term symptomatic dysphagia and xerostomia. Model robustness was examined using probabilistic sensitivity analysis, cohort analysis, and tornado diagram. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify the cost-effective scenarios. IMPT was considered as cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was below the societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Results Compared with IMRT, IMPT provided an extra 0.205 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at an additional cost of 34,926.6 US dollars ($), and had an ICER of $170,082.4/ QALY for the base case. At the current WTP of China ($33,558 / QALY) and a current IMPT treatment costs of $50,000, IMPT should provide a minimum NTCP-reduction of 47.5, 50.8, 55.6, 63.3 and 77.2% to be considered cost-effective for patient age levels of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50-year-old, respectively. For patients at the median age level, reducing the current IMPT costs ($50,000) to a $30,000 level would make the minimum NTCP-reduction threshold for “cost-effective” decrease from 91.4 to 44.6%, at the current WTP of China (from 69.0 to 33.5%, at a WTP of $50,000 / QALY; and from 39.7 to 19.1%, at a WTP of $100,000 / QALY). Conclusions Cost-effective scenarios of PBT exist in Chinese OPC patients at the current WTP of China. Considering a potential upcoming increase in PBT use in China, such cost-effective scenarios may further expand if a decrease of proton treatment costs occurs or an increase of WTP level. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08638-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510095, P. R. China
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Yi-Xiang Huang
- Department of Health Management, Public Health Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, P. R. China
| | - Deniz Okat
- Department of Finance, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, P. R. China
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Jin Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230031, P. R. China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510045, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Doyen J, Aloi D, Groulier A, Vidal M, Lesueur P, Calugaru V, Bondiau PY. Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:550-553. [PMID: 34284969 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Reirradiation and irradiation of sarcoma is often difficult due to the frequent need for a high dose of radiation in order to increase tumor control. This can result in a greater risk of toxicity which can be mitigated with the use of proton therapy. The present review aims to summarize the role of proton therapy in these 2 clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Doyen
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - D Aloi
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - A Groulier
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - M Vidal
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - P Lesueur
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Centre de Protonthérapie de Normandie, University of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - V Calugaru
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - P Y Bondiau
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Doyen J, Sunyach MP, Almairac F, Bourg V, Naghavi AO, Duhil de Bénazé G, Claren A, Padovani L, Benezery K, Noël G, Hannoun-Lévi JM, Guedea F, Giralt J, Vidal M, Baudin G, Opitz L, Claude L, Bondiau PY. Early Toxicities After High Dose Rate Proton Therapy in Cancer Treatments. Front Oncol 2021; 10:613089. [PMID: 33520724 PMCID: PMC7842185 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.613089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The conventional dose rate of radiation therapy is 0.01–0.05 Gy per second. According to preclinical studies, an increased dose rate may offer similar anti-tumoral effect while dramatically improving normal tissue protection. This study aims at evaluating the early toxicities for patients irradiated with high dose rate pulsed proton therapy (PT). Materials and Methods A single institution retrospective chart review was performed for patients treated with high dose rate (10 Gy per second) pulsed proton therapy, from September 2016 to April 2020. This included both benign and malignant tumors with ≥3 months follow-up, evaluated for acute (≤2 months) and subacute (>2 months) toxicity after the completion of PT. Results There were 127 patients identified, with a median follow up of 14.8 months (3–42.9 months). The median age was 55 years (1.6–89). The cohort most commonly consisted of benign disease (55.1%), cranial targets (95.1%), and were treated with surgery prior to PT (56.7%). There was a median total PT dose of 56 Gy (30–74 Gy), dose per fraction of 2 Gy (1–3 Gy), and CTV size of 47.6 ml (5.6–2,106.1 ml). Maximum acute grade ≥2 toxicity were observed in 49 (38.6%) patients, of which 8 (6.3%) experienced grade 3 toxicity. No acute grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. Maximum subacute grade 2, 3, and 4 toxicity were discovered in 25 (19.7%), 12 (9.4%), and 1 (0.8%) patient(s), respectively. Conclusion In this cohort, utilizing high dose rate proton therapy (10 Gy per second) did not result in a major decrease in acute and subacute toxicity. Longer follow-up and comparative studies with conventional dose rate are required to evaluate whether this approach offers a toxicity benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Doyen
- Université Côte d'Azur, Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Fédération Claude Lalanne, Nice, France
| | | | - Fabien Almairac
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Véronique Bourg
- Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Gwenaëlle Duhil de Bénazé
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Audrey Claren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Laetitia Padovani
- Oncology Radiotherapy Department, CRCM Inserm, UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, AMU UM105, Genome Instability and Carcinogenesis, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (Icans), Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi
- Université Côte d'Azur, Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Fédération Claude Lalanne, Nice, France
| | - Ferran Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) and University of Barcelona (UB), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Giralt
- Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marie Vidal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Guillaume Baudin
- Department of Radiology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Lucas Opitz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiotherapy, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carrie C, Kieffer V, Figarella-Branger D, Masliah-Planchon J, Bolle S, Bernier V, Laprie A, Supiot S, Leseur J, Habrand JL, Alapetite C, Kerr C, Dufour C, Claude L, Chapet S, Huchet A, Bondiau PY, Escande A, Truc G, Nguyen TD, Pasteuris C, Vigneron C, Muracciole X, Bourdeaut F, Appay R, Dubray B, Colin C, Ferlay C, Dussart S, Chabaud S, Padovani L. Exclusive Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy and Reduced Boost Volume for Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma: Pooled Analysis of the 2 French Multicentric Studies MSFOP98 and MSFOP 2007 and Correlation With Molecular Subgroups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:1204-1217. [PMID: 32768563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Medulloblastoma has recently been characterized as a heterogeneous disease with 4 distinct molecular subgroups: wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), group 3, and group 4, with a new definition of risk stratification. We report progression-free survival, overall survival, and long-term cognitive effects in children with standard-risk medulloblastoma exclusively treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT), reduced boost volume, and online quality control, and we explore the prognostic value of biological characteristics in this chemotherapy-naïve population. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma were enrolled in 2 successive prospective multicentric studies, MSFOP 98 and MSFOP 2007, and received exclusive HFRT (36 Gy, 1 Gy/fraction twice daily) to the craniospinal axis followed by a boost at 68 Gy restricted to the tumor bed (1.5 cm margin), with online quality assurance before treatment. Patients with MYC or MYCN amplification were not excluded at the time of the study. We report progression-free survival and overall survival in the global population, and according to molecular subgroups as per World Health Organization 2016 molecular classification, and we present cognitive evaluations based on the Wechsler scale. RESULTS Data from 114 patients included in the MSFOP 98 trial from December 1998 to October 2001 (n = 48) and in the MSFOP 2007 from October 2008 to July 2013 (n = 66) were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 16.2 (range, 6.4-19.6) years for the MSFOP 98 cohort and 6.5 (1.6-9.6) years for the MSFOP 2007 cohort, 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival in the global population were 84% (74%-89%) and 74% (65%-81%), respectively. Molecular classification was determined for 91 patients (WNT [n = 19], SHH [n = 12], and non-WNT/non-SHH [n = 60]-including group 3 [n = 9], group 4 [n = 29], and not specified [n = 22]). Our results showed more favorable outcome for the WNT-activated subgroup and a worse prognosis for SHH-activated patients. Three patients had isolated extra-central nervous system relapse. The slope of neurocognitive decline in the global population was shallower than that observed in patients with a normofractionated regimen combined with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS HFRT led to a 5-year survival rate similar to other treatments combined with chemotherapy, with a reduced treatment duration of only 6 weeks. We confirm the MSFOP 98 results and the prognostic value of molecular status in patients with medulloblastoma, even in the absence of chemotherapy. Intelligence quotient was more preserved in children with medulloblastoma who received exclusive HFRT and reduced local boost, and intelligence quotient decline was delayed compared with patients receiving standard regimen. HFRT may be appropriate for patients who do not consent to or are not eligible for prospective clinical trials; for patients from developing countries for whom aplasia or ileus may be difficult to manage in a context of high cost/effectiveness constraints; and for whom shortened duration of RT may be easier to implement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Carrie
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leon Berard Cancer Center, and University of Lyon, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1044, INSA, Lyon, France.
| | - Virginie Kieffer
- Neuropsychologue CSI (Saint-Maurice hospital)/Gustave Roussy, Département de cancérologie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Dominique Figarella-Branger
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Institute of Neurophysiopathology, Marseille, France; Department of AnatomoPathology and Neuropathology, AP-HM, University Hospital Center la Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Valérie Bernier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Alexis Vautrin Cancer Center, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Institute of Cancer Toulouse-Oncopôle, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Julie Leseur
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiotherapy, François Baclesse Cancer Center, Caen, France
| | | | - Christine Kerr
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut regional du Cancer, Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leon Berard Cancer Center, and University of Lyon, CNRS UMR 5220, INSERM U1044, INSA, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Chapet
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Center of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Aymeri Huchet
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Center of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Truc
- Department of Radiotherapy, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Tan Dat Nguyen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jean Godinot Institute, Reims, France
| | - Caroline Pasteuris
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Center of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Céline Vigneron
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Franck Bourdeaut
- SIREDO Pediatric Cancer Center, Institut Curie, Paris-Sciences-Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Romain Appay
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Institute of Neurophysiopathology, Marseille, France; Department of AnatomoPathology and Neuropathology, AP-HM, University Hospital Center la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Bernard Dubray
- Department of Radiotherapy, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Carole Colin
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Institute of Neurophysiopathology, Marseille, France; Department of AnatomoPathology and Neuropathology, AP-HM, University Hospital Center la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Céline Ferlay
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Dussart
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Leon Berard Cancer center, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kinj R, Doyen J, Hannoun-Lévi JM, Naghavi AO, Chand ME, Baudin G, Ferrero JM, François E, Evesque L, Borchiellini D, Benezery K, Bondiau PY. Stereotactic Pelvic Reirradiation for Locoregional Cancer Relapse. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:e15-e21. [PMID: 32641243 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Up to 40% of patients who have received radiation for a pelvic malignancy will develop locoregional recurrence in the previously irradiated volume. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been used in the oligometastatic setting, and provides an ablative approach ideal for reirradiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after SBRT reirradiation of extraosseous recurrences in the pelvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single institution retrospective study evaluated patients treated with SBRT reirradiation in the pelvis from January 2011 to February 2018. Patients with more than five oligometastatic lesions, >7 cm in size, and recurrence within the prostate were excluded. RESULTS In total, 30 patients were treated with SBRT with a median follow-up of 29.4 months. The primary tumour sites were most commonly rectum (30.8%) and prostate (30.8%). The median time interval between irradiation for the primary and SBRT reirradiation was 48 months (3-245). The typical reirradiation treatment was 35 Gy in five fractions, the median gross tumour volume size was 10.2 (0.3-110.5) ml and the most common target was the iliac nodes (40%). There were three (10%) acute grade 3 toxicities and no late grade 3 or more toxicities. At 12/24 months, local relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival were 67.7%/50.7%, 67%/41.7%, 34.8%/14.9% and 83.2%/62.5%, respectively. On univariate analysis, improved local control was associated with low gross tumour volume (<10 ml) (P = 0.003) and prostate primary (P = 0.02), but was no longer significant on multivariate analysis. The proximity of organ at risk to the target did not significantly correlate with worse toxicity (P = 0.14) or tumour coverage (gross tumour volume: P = 0.8, planning target volume: P = 0.4). CONCLUSION SBRT pelvic reirradiation in oligometastatic patients is a safe and effective treatment modality. Careful consideration should be taken with larger tumour size, as it may be associated with worse oncological and toxicity outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kinj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - J Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - J M Hannoun-Lévi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - A O Naghavi
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - M E Chand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - G Baudin
- Department of Radiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - J M Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - E François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - L Evesque
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - D Borchiellini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - K Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - P Y Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li G, Qiu B, Huang YX, Doyen J, Bondiau PY, Benezery K, Xia YF, Qian CN. Cost-effectiveness analysis of proton beam therapy for treatment decision making in paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:599. [PMID: 32590957 PMCID: PMC7320568 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07083-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cost-effectiveness is a pivotal consideration for clinical decision making of high-tech cancer treatment in developing countries. Intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT, the advanced form of proton beam therapy) has been found to improve the prognosis of the patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers compared with intensity-modulated photon-radiation therapy (IMRT). However, the cost-effectiveness of IMPT has not yet been fully evaluated. This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of IMPT versus IMRT for treatment decision making of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in Chinese settings. Methods A 3-state Markov model was designed for cost-effectiveness analysis. A base case evaluation was performed on a patient of 47-year-old (median age of patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China). Model robustness was examined by probabilistic sensitivity analysis, Markov cohort analysis and Tornado diagram. Cost-effective scenarios of IMPT were further identified by one-way sensitivity analyses and stratified analyses were performed for different age levels. The outcome measure of the model was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A strategy was defined as cost-effective if the ICER was below the societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China (30,828 US dollars ($) / quality-adjusted life year (QALY)). Results IMPT was identified as being cost-effective for the base case at the WTP of China, providing an extra 1.65 QALYs at an additional cost of $38,928.7 compared with IMRT, and had an ICER of $23,611.2 / QALY. Of note, cost-effective scenarios of IMPT only existed in the following independent conditions: probability of IMPT eradicating cancer ≥0.867; probability of IMRT eradicating cancer ≤0.764; or cost of IMPT ≤ $52,163.9. Stratified analyses for different age levels demonstrated that IMPT was more cost-effective in younger patients than older patients, and was cost-effective only in patients ≤56-year-old. Conclusions Despite initially regarded as bearing high treatment cost, IMPT could still be cost-effective for patients with paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China. The tumor control superiority of IMPT over IMRT and the patient’s age should be the principal considerations for clinical decision of prescribing this new irradiation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510095, P. R. China
| | - Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Yi-Xiang Huang
- Department of Health Management, Public Health Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, P. R. China
| | - Jerome Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06189, Nice, France.,Mediterranean Institute of Proton Therapy, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University of Nice-Sophia, 06200, Nice, France
| | - Yun-Fei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China
| | - Chao-Nan Qian
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, P. R. China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510045, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mlynarski P, Delingette H, Alghamdi H, Bondiau PY, Ayache N. Anatomically consistent CNN-based segmentation of organs-at-risk in cranial radiotherapy. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2020; 7:014502. [PMID: 32064300 PMCID: PMC7016364 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.7.1.014502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Planning of radiotherapy involves accurate segmentation of a large number of organs at risk (OAR), i.e., organs for which irradiation doses should be minimized to avoid important side effects of the therapy. We propose a deep learning method for segmentation of OAR inside the head, from magnetic resonance images (MRIs). Our system performs segmentation of eight structures: eye, lens, optic nerve, optic chiasm, pituitary gland, hippocampus, brainstem, and brain. We propose an efficient algorithm to train neural networks for an end-to-end segmentation of multiple and nonexclusive classes, addressing problems related to computational costs and missing ground truth segmentations for a subset of classes. We enforce anatomical consistency of the result in a postprocessing step. In particular, we introduce a graph-based algorithm for segmentation of the optic nerves, enforcing the connectivity between the eyes and the optic chiasm. We report cross-validated quantitative results on a database of 44 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRIs with provided segmentations of the considered OAR, which were originally used for radiotherapy planning. In addition, the segmentations produced by our model on an independent test set of 50 MRIs were evaluated by an experienced radiotherapist in order to qualitatively assess their accuracy. The mean distances between produced segmentations and the ground truth ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 mm across different organs. A vast majority (96%) of the produced segmentations were found acceptable for radiotherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Mlynarski
- Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, Epione Research Team, Nice, France
| | - Hervé Delingette
- Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, Epione Research Team, Nice, France
| | - Hamza Alghamdi
- Université Côte d’Azur, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | - Nicholas Ayache
- Université Côte d’Azur, Inria, Epione Research Team, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Humbert O, Bourg V, Mondot L, Gal J, Bondiau PY, Fontaine D, Barriere J, Saada-Bouzid E, Paquet M, Chardin D, Almairac F, Vandenbos F, Darcourt J. Correction to: 18F-DOPA PET/CT in brain tumors: impact on multidisciplinary brain tumor board decisions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:1581. [PMID: 30980100 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04321-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Jérôme Barriere was inadvertently missing in the original version of this article. He has participated to the study design, protocol writing and inclusion of a significant number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Humbert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France. .,TIRO-UMR E 4320, UCA/CEA, Nice, France. .,Clinical Research and Innovation Office, UCA, Nice, France.
| | - Véronique Bourg
- Department of Neurology, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Lydiane Mondot
- Department of Neuroradiology, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France
| | | | - Denys Fontaine
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Jérôme Barriere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pôle de Santé Saint Jean, Cagnes-sur-Mer, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Marie Paquet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.,TIRO-UMR E 4320, UCA/CEA, Nice, France
| | - David Chardin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France
| | - Fabien Almairac
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Fanny Vandenbos
- Central Laboratory of Pathology, Pasteur I University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Jacques Darcourt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.,TIRO-UMR E 4320, UCA/CEA, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Allodji RS, Haddy N, Vu-Bezin G, Dumas A, Fresneau B, Mansouri I, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, El-Fayech C, Pacquement H, Munzer M, Bondiau PY, Berchery D, Oberlin O, Rubino C, Diallo I, de Vathaire F. Risk of subsequent colorectal cancers after a solid tumor in childhood: Effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27495. [PMID: 30345604 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Very few previous studies have addressed the question of colorectal cancer (CRC) after childhood cancer treatment. We aimed to quantify the roles of radiation therapy and chemotherapy agents in the occurrence of subsequent CRC. METHODS A nested case-control study was conducted using 36 CRC cases and 140 controls selected from 7032 five-year survivors of the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (FCCSS) cohort, treated from 1945 to 2000 in France. The radiation dose-distribution metrics at the site of CRC and doses of individual chemotherapeutic agents were calculated. Conditional logistic regressions were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS Overall, patients who received radiotherapy with estimated dose to colon had a 4.3-fold (95% CI, 1.3-17.6) increased risk for CRC compared with patients who did not receive radiotherapy, after adjustment for chemotherapy. This risk increased to 8.9-fold and 19.3-fold among patients who received radiation doses ranging from 20 to 29.99 Gy and ≥30 Gy, respectively. Our data reported a significantly elevated OR for anthracyclines, after controlling for radiotherapy and MOPP regimen. But, restricted analyses excluding patients who had received ≥30 Gy showed that only radiation doses ranging from 20 to 29.99 Gy produced a significant increase in subsequent CRC risk (OR = 7.8; 95% CI, 1.3-56.0), after controlling for anthracyclines and MOPP regimen. CONCLUSIONS The risk of subsequent CRC was significantly increased after radiation dose (even < 30 Gy). This novel finding supports the need to update monitoring guidelines for CRC to optimize the long-term follow-up for subsequent CRC in survivors of childhood cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigue S Allodji
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Giao Vu-Bezin
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Agnès Dumas
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Pediatric Oncology, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Imene Mansouri
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Chu Angers, Pediatric Oncology, F-49933 Angers, France
| | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Pediatric Oncology, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Odile Oberlin
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Department of Pediatric Oncology, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Rubino
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, Villejuif, France.,INSERM, CESP, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France.,Gustave Roussy, Department of Clinical Research, Cancer and Radiation Team, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bondiau PY, Gal J, Chapellier C, Haudebourg J, Courdi A, Levy J, Gerard A, Sumodhee S, Maurin M, Château Y, Barranger E, Ferrero JM, Thariat J. Robotic Stereotactic Boost in Early Breast Cancer, a Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:374-380. [PMID: 30612961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of a single-fraction 8-Gy stereotactic boost after whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer. The primary aim of this phase 2 study was to evaluate cutaneous breast toxicity using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4) 3 months after the boost. Secondary objectives were local control, survival, and patient-reported quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and breast-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR 23 questionnaires. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with invasive ductal or lobular pT1-2 breast cancer treated with lumpectomy with clear margins and pN0 were included. Patients requiring chemotherapy were excluded. RESULTS Twenty-eight eligible patients received the planned boost, and 26 had hormonal therapy. The procedure was technically successful without procedural complications. A median of 3 fiducials were tracked, and 115 beams were used. There were 22 acute grade 1 breast skin toxicities, including fibrosis, pain, erythema, or pigmentation. There were 2 acute grade 2 erythemas. Median skin boost dose was inversely correlated with acute skin toxicity (P = .028). QLQ-C30 scores revealed acute dyspnea and arm symptoms without correlation to the boost dose. Breast symptom QLQ-BR23 scores did not deteriorate, although upset with hair loss and systemic side effects of hormonal therapy were observed. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 1 patient had in-boost-field relapse, and there were 5 late grade 1 and 1 grade 2 skin toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Single-fraction stereotactic boost after conventional whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer is feasible with minor toxicities. Quality of life and specific breast items showed excellent patient acceptance.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Breast Neoplasms/psychology
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/psychology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/psychology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/radiotherapy
- Feasibility Studies
- Female
- Fibrosis
- Humans
- Mastectomy, Segmental/methods
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Prospective Studies
- Quality of Life
- Radiosurgery/methods
- Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
- Severity of Illness Index
- Skin/radiation effects
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | | | - Adel Courdi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Johan Levy
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Anais Gerard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Shakeel Sumodhee
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Maeva Maurin
- Department of Clinical Research, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Yann Château
- Department of Clinical Research, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | | | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France - Unicaen - Normandie Universite
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Humbert O, Bourg V, Mondot L, Gal J, Bondiau PY, Fontaine D, Saada-Bouzid E, Paquet M, Chardin D, Almairac F, Vandenbos F, Darcourt J. 18F-DOPA PET/CT in brain tumors: impact on multidisciplinary brain tumor board decisions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:558-568. [PMID: 30612162 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the therapeutic impact and diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases. METHODS Patients with histologically proven glioblastoma or brain metastases were prospectively included in this monocentric clinical trial (IMOTEP). Patients were included either due to a clinical suspicion of relapse or to assess residual tumor infiltration after treatment. Multimodality brain MRI and 18F-DOPA PET were performed. Patients' data were discussed during a Multidisciplinary Neuro-oncology Tumor Board (MNTB) meeting. The discussion was first based on clinical and MRI data, and an initial diagnosis and treatment plan were proposed. Secondly, a new discussion was conducted based on the overall imaging results, including 18F-DOPA PET. A second diagnosis and therapeutic plan were proposed. A retrospective and definitive diagnosis was obtained after a 3-month follow-up and considered as the reference standard. RESULTS One hundred six cases were prospectively investigated by the MNTB. All patients with brain metastases (N = 41) had a clinical suspicion of recurrence. The addition of 18F-DOPA PET data changed the diagnosis and treatment plan in 39.0% and 17.1% of patients' cases, respectively. Concerning patients with a suspicion of recurrent glioblastoma (N = 12), the implementation of 18F-DOPA PET changed the diagnosis and treatment plan in 33.3% of cases. In patients evaluated to assess residual glioblastoma infiltration after treatment (N = 53), 18F-DOPA PET data had a lower impact with only 5.7% (3/53) of diagnostic changes and 3.8% (2/53) of therapeutic plan changes. The definitive reference diagnosis was available in 98/106 patients. For patients with tumor recurrence suspicion, the adjunction of 18F-DOPA PET increased the Younden's index from 0.44 to 0.53 in brain metastases and from 0.2 to 1.0 in glioblastoma, reflecting an increase in diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION 18F-DOPA PET has a significant impact on the management of patients with a suspicion of brain tumor recurrence, either glioblastoma or brain metastases, but a low impact when used to evaluate the residual glioblastoma infiltration after a first-line radio-chemotherapy or second-line bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Humbert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
- TIRO-UMR E 4320, UCA/CEA, Nice, France.
- Clinical Research and Innovation Office, UCA, Nice, France.
| | - Véronique Bourg
- Department of Neurology, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Lydiane Mondot
- Department of Neuroradiology, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France
| | | | - Denys Fontaine
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Marie Paquet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France
- TIRO-UMR E 4320, UCA/CEA, Nice, France
| | - David Chardin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France
| | - Fabien Almairac
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pasteur 2 University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Fanny Vandenbos
- Central Laboratory of Pathology, Pasteur I University Hospital, UCA, Nice, France
| | - Jacques Darcourt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France
- TIRO-UMR E 4320, UCA/CEA, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mansouri I, Allodji RS, Hill C, El-Fayech C, Pein F, Diallo S, Schwartz B, Vu-Bezin G, Veres C, Souchard V, Dumas A, Bolle S, Thomas-Teinturier C, Pacquement H, Munzer M, Bondiau PY, Berchery D, Fresneau B, Oberlin O, Diallo I, De Vathaire F, Haddy N. The role of irradiated heart and left ventricular volumes in heart failure occurrence after childhood cancer. Eur J Heart Fail 2018; 21:509-518. [PMID: 30592114 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paediatric cancer survivors have a high risk of developing cardiac diseases, and the most frequent cardiac disease is heart failure (HF). The radiation dose-volume effects in the heart and cardiac substructures have not been explored in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Therefore, the role of irradiated heart volume in the occurrence of HF among this population remains unclear. The aims of this study were to determine the doses and irradiated volumes of the heart and left ventricle (LV) related to the risk of HF in CCS and to investigate the impact of anthracycline exposure on this risk. METHODS AND RESULTS A case-control study nested in the French Childhood Cancer Survivors Study cohort. The mean heart and left ventricular doses and volumes indicators were estimated by reconstruction of individual treatments. A total of 239 HF cases and 1042 matched controls were included. The median age of HF diagnosis was 25.1 years. The median volume of the heart that received ≥ 30 Gy was 61.1% for cases and 16.9% for controls. In patients who did not receive anthracycline, the risk of HF was increased 3.6-fold when less than 10% of the LV received ≥ 30 Gy when compared to patients who were not exposed to any cardiac radiation and anthracycline. CONCLUSIONS Small irradiated volumes of the heart or LV were significantly associated with HF risk. To the author's knowledge, this is the first study to report a dose-response relationship based on dose-volume indicators in CCS, which can be translated efficiently into current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imène Mansouri
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Rodrigue S Allodji
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Catherine Hill
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Department of Childhood and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - François Pein
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest ICO Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain (Nantes), France
| | - Stéphanie Diallo
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Gonesse, France
| | - Boris Schwartz
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Giao Vu-Bezin
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Souchard
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Agnès Dumas
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Departement of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cécile Thomas-Teinturier
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, AP-HP Hôpitaux Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Brice Fresneau
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Department of Childhood and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Odile Oberlin
- Department of Childhood and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Florent De Vathaire
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,CESP, INSERM U 1018, Cancer and Radiation team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chaikh A, Calugaru V, Bondiau PY, Thariat J, Balosso J. Impact of the NTCP modeling on medical decision to select eligible patient for proton therapy: the usefulness of EUD as an indicator to rank modern photon vs proton treatment plans. Int J Radiat Biol 2018; 94:789-797. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1486516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulhamid Chaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (CHUGA), Grenoble, France
- France HADRON National Research Infrastructure, IPNL, Lyon, France
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN—UMR6534—Unicaen—Normandy University, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN—UMR6534—Unicaen—Normandy University, Caen, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (CHUGA), Grenoble, France
- France HADRON National Research Infrastructure, IPNL, Lyon, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
- University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bondiau PY, Chaikh A, Balosso J, GFRP. Impact of Radiobiological Models on the Medical Decision for Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy: Average Clinical Data Versus Individual Clinical Data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
22
|
Thouvenin-Doulet S, Berger C, Casagranda L, Oberlin O, Marec-Berard P, Pacquement H, Guibout C, Freycon C, N'Guyen TD, Bondiau PY, Laprie A, Berchery D, El-Fayech C, Trombert-Paviot B, de Vathaire F. Fecundity and Quality of Life of Women Treated for Solid Childhood Tumors Between 1948 and 1992 in France. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 7:415-423. [PMID: 29851372 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe fecundity in female survivors of childhood cancer and consider the correlation with quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS Of 1744 women treated for childhood cancer before the age of 15 years at one of eight French cancer treatment centers between 1948 and 1992, 1187 who were alive in 2005 were sent a self-administered questionnaire, including questions about health status, QOL (MOS SF-36), and fecundity. A standardized fecundity ratio (SFR) was calculated (SFR: observed/expected number of children) for each individual based on a national reference. RESULTS Of the 972 individuals (82%) who responded, 53% had at least 1 child. The overall SFR, 0.65, was dependent upon the initial diagnosis, more decreased in Central Nervous System tumors (0.24; p < 10-3) than in Germ cell (0.46; p = 0.03) or Sympathetic Nervous System tumors (0.79; p = 0.02). The average QOL motor score was 72.5 ± 19.5, and the average mental score was 61.4 ± 16.7. After adjusting for age, pathology, and self-reported sequelae in the questionnaires, it was determined that SF-36 mental (p = 0.002) and motor (p < 0.0002) scores correlated positively with fecundity, and SF-36 scores correlated negatively with locomotor late effects (p < 0.0001), growth insufficiency (p = 0.002), and psychological disorders (p < 0.001). Gonadal insufficiency was correlated with neither motor nor mental scores. CONCLUSION Women treated for childhood cancer demonstrated impaired fecundity that correlated with poor QOL, as registered by the SF-36. Patients should be warned of the risk of impaired fecundity early during the follow-up. If possible, preservation of fertility should be prioritized at initiation of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claire Berger
- 1 Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Unit, University Hospital , Saint-Etienne, France .,2 Childhood Cancer Registry of the Rhône-Alpes Region, University of Saint Etienne , Saint-Etienne, France .,3 Clinical and Exercise Physiology Laboratory, (EA 4607 SNA EPIS), University Hospital , Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Léonie Casagranda
- 1 Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Unit, University Hospital , Saint-Etienne, France .,2 Childhood Cancer Registry of the Rhône-Alpes Region, University of Saint Etienne , Saint-Etienne, France .,3 Clinical and Exercise Physiology Laboratory, (EA 4607 SNA EPIS), University Hospital , Saint-Etienne, France .,4 Department of Public Health and Medical Informatics, University of Saint Etienne , Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Odile Oberlin
- 5 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif, France
| | - Perrine Marec-Berard
- 6 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institute of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology , Lyon, France
| | | | - Catherine Guibout
- 5 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif, France .,8 Inserm, U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health , Villejuif, France .,9 Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris XI , Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Freycon
- 10 Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Grenoble , Grenoble, France
| | - Tan Dat N'Guyen
- 11 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot , Reims, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- 12 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne , Nice, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- 13 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Centre Claudius Régaud , Toulouse, France
| | - Delphine Berchery
- 13 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Centre Claudius Régaud , Toulouse, France
| | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- 5 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif, France .,8 Inserm, U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health , Villejuif, France .,9 Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris XI , Villejuif, France
| | - Béatrice Trombert-Paviot
- 2 Childhood Cancer Registry of the Rhône-Alpes Region, University of Saint Etienne , Saint-Etienne, France .,3 Clinical and Exercise Physiology Laboratory, (EA 4607 SNA EPIS), University Hospital , Saint-Etienne, France .,4 Department of Public Health and Medical Informatics, University of Saint Etienne , Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- 5 Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy , Villejuif, France .,8 Inserm, U1018, Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health , Villejuif, France .,9 Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris XI , Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Doyen J, Poudenx M, Gal J, Otto J, Guerder C, Naghavi AO, Gérard A, Leysalle A, Cohen C, Padovani B, Ianessi A, Schiappa R, Chamorey E, Bondiau PY. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy after concomitant chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A TITE-CRM phase 1 trial. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:239-245. [PMID: 29650404 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2017] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Platinum based chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With evidence that NSCLC can have a dose dependent response with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), we hypothesize that a SABR boost on residual tumor treated with chemoradiotherapy could increase treatment efficacy. The purpose of this study was to determine feasibility of such an approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective phase I trial was performed including 26 patients. Time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM) was used for dose escalation which ranged from 3 × 7 to 3 × 12 Gy for the stereotactic boost, after 46 Gy (2 Gy per day) of chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS Median follow-up was of 37.1 months (1.7-60.7), and 3, 4, 3, 3, 9 and 4 patients were included at the dose levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively. During chemoradiotherapy, 9 patients experienced grade 3 toxicity. After stereotactic radiotherapy, 1 patient experienced an esophageal fistula (with local relapse) at the 3 × 11 Gy level, and 1 patient died from hemoptysis at the 3 × 12 Gy level. The 2-year rate of local control, locoregional free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival was 70.3%, 55.5%, 44.5% and 50.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION In the treatment of NSCLC with chemoradiotherapy followed by a stereotactic boost, the safe recommended dose in our protocol was a boost dose of 3 × 11 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - Michel Poudenx
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Josiane Otto
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Caroline Guerder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital de la croix-rouge française, Toulon, France
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, United States
| | - Anais Gérard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Axel Leysalle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Charlotte Cohen
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nice, France
| | - Bernard Padovani
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nice, France
| | - Antoine Ianessi
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Department of Radiology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Emmanuel Chamorey
- University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Padovani L, Chapon F, André N, Boucekine M, Geoffray A, Bourdeau F, Masliah-Planchon J, Claude L, Huchet A, Laprie A, Supiot S, Coche-Dequéant B, Kerr C, Alapetite C, Leseur J, Nguyen T, Chapet S, Bernier V, Bondiau PY, Noel G, Habrand JL, Bolle S, Doz F, Dufour C, Muracciole X, Carrie C. Hippocampal Sparing During Craniospinal Irradiation: What Did We Learn About the Incidence of Perihippocampus Metastases? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:980-986. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
25
|
ElAlfy E, Doyen J, Bondiau PY. The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy using the CyberKnife system in limited hepatic metastases. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
481 Background: CyberKnife has shown increasing evidence supporting its use for liver metastases with high rates of local control (LC) and low toxicity. we aim to investigate its safety and efficacy for patients with limited hepatic metastases. Methods: 48 patients (pts) with 63 metastatic liver lesions were treated with Cyberknife between March 2007 and November 2012. Most of pts were aged more than 65 years (ys) (n = 25) and males (n = 25). ECOG Performance status was 2 in 20 pts and 1 in 17 pts. Primary tumors were from GIT (n = 34), breast (6), ovary (2), choroidal melanoma (2), lung (1), kidney (1), thyroid (1) and CUP (1). Number of lesions treated per pt was 1 in 36, 2 in 9 and 3 in 3. GTV volume ranged from 0.81 to 164.07 cm³ (median = 22.53). Median volume of PTV was 23.73 cm³ and mean was 44.11 cm³ (range 2.03 - 215.40). We do not use margin (CTV = GTV). Dose per fraction ranged from 5 Gy to 15 Gy, median total dose was 43.5 Gy (range 25 - 45) in 3 fractions (3-5) and 143 beams prescribed to 80 % isodose line. The delivered median min GTV dose was 39.01 Gy and the prescribed median min PTV dose was 35.55 Gy. Results: Treatment was well tolerated with minimal grade 1 toxicity. 2 acute toxicities as nausea, asthenia and moderate colics. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Median follow-up was 11.9 months, overall survival (OS) was 83.6% and 57% at 1 and 2 yrs respectively, disease free survival (DFS) was 69.5% and 46.1% at 1 and 2 yrs and LC was 76.3% and 57.9% at 1 and 2 yrs. OS influenced by; Age < 65 years (P = 0.033), Males (P = 0.050), PTV volume < 50 cm3 (P = 0.002), Coverage > 95% for GTV (P = 0.041). Factors affected DFS were ; Age < 65 years (P = 0.034), Males (P = 0.017), Total dose of 45 Gy (P = 0.001), Dose per fraction equal to 15 Gy (P = 0.001), P.S = 2 (P = 0.024), Max dose > 55 Gy for GTV (P = 0.000), CTV (P = 0.000), PTV (P = 0.000), coverage > 95% for GTV (P = 0.048), CTV (P = 0.031), PTV (P = 0.001), min dose > 35 Gy for GTV (P = 0.032), CTV (p = 0.013), LC affected by; Females (P = 0.013). min dose > 35 Gy for PTV (P = 0.05). Conclusions: Cyberknife is an effective modality with good LC and minimal side effects for limited hepatic metastases. We recommend further studies to define the role of combined modality treatment, clarify treatment parameters and illustrate the related quality of life.
Collapse
|
26
|
Tardy MP, Gal J, Chamorey E, Almairac F, Vandenbos F, Bondiau PY, Saada-Bouzid E. Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Adult Patients with High-Grade Gliomas. Oncologist 2017; 23:337-345. [PMID: 29133516 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard to objectively assess the effect of treatments. To help improve the quality of RCTs, experts established a list of recommendations, the CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement. In this study, we evaluated the implementation of the CONSORT Statement in the field of high-grade gliomas in adult patients and looked for criteria associated with higher quality of RCTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched all high-grade gliomas RCTs published in PubMed between January 1990 and December 2016. The quality of these RCTs was assessed by completing a modified CONSORT Score (CS). RESULTS Ninety-six published RCTs were identified. The median CS was 19.5 on a scale of 0-33. Items were not equally reported. Items regarding the method of randomization or the blinding were reported in less than 25% of RCTs. However, the CS has constantly improved over the years. Before the implementation of the CONSORT Statement in 1996, the median CS was 13, whereas it was 17 for the period 1996-2004 and 22 after 2005. A higher CS was observed when RCTs were published in a journal with an impact factor above 10 (p < .001) or after 2010 (p = .001), when the primary outcome was clearly defined (p < .001) and for RCTs that enrolled more than 200 patients (p = .004). CONCLUSION Although there has been a steady improvement in the CS over the years in the field of high-grade gliomas, a major effort must be made in the reporting methods for randomization and blinding. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study showed that the quality of reporting of randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning the treatment of high-grade gliomas is poor. Factors associated with a better quality of reports were identified and should be incorporated into the design of future RCTs. When clinicians read the results of RCTs, they should be aware of the possible inadequate reporting from these trials and take it into account for the management of their patients. This study identifies how RCTs can be improved in their reporting but also in their design, in order to advance care for patients with high-grade gliomas in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magalie P Tardy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Emmanuel Chamorey
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Fabien Almairac
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pasteur II University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Fanny Vandenbos
- Central Laboratory of Pathology, Pasteur I University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Radiotherapy, Cancer Research Center, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kinj R, Bondiau PY, François E, Gérard JP, Naghavi AO, Leysalle A, Chamorey E, Evesque L, Padovani B, Ianessi A, Benezery K, Doyen J. Radiosensitivity of Colon and Rectal Lung Oligometastasis Treated With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2017; 16:e211-e220. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2016] [Revised: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
28
|
Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Drui D, Doutriaux I, Michel G, Auquier P, Dumas A, Berger C, Bernier V, Bohrer S, Bondiau PY, Filhon B, Fresneau B, Freycon C, Stefan D, Helfre S, Jackson A, Kerr C, Laprie A, Leseur J, Mahé MA, Oudot C, Pluchard C, Proust S, Sudour-Bonnange H, Vigneron C, Lassau N, Schlumberger M, Conter CF, de Vathaire F. A French national breast and thyroid cancer screening programme for survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancers - DeNaCaPST programme. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:326. [PMID: 28499444 PMCID: PMC5427546 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3318-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Survival of childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancers has increased with progress in the management of the treatments and has reached more than 80% at 5 years. Nevertheless, these survivors are at great risk of second cancers and non-malignant co-morbidities in later life. DeNaCaPST is a non-interventional study whose aim is to organize a national screening for thyroid cancer and breast cancer in survivors of CAYA cancers. It will study the compliance with international recommendations, with the aim, regarding a breast screening programme, of offering for every woman living in France, at equal risk, an equal screening. Method DeNaCaPST trial is coordinated by the INSERM 1018 unit in cooperation with the LEA (French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study for Leukaemia) study’s coordinators, the long term follow up committee and the paediatric radiation committee of the SFCE (French Society of Childhood Cancers). A total of 35 centres spread across metropolitan France and la Reunion will participate. FCCSS (French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study), LEA and central registry will be interrogated to identify eligible patients. To participate, centers agreed to perform a complete “long-term follow-up consultations” according to good clinical practice and the guidelines of the SFCE (French Society of Children Cancers). Discussion As survival has greatly improved in childhood cancers, detection of therapy-related malignancies has become a priority even if new radiation techniques will lead to better protection for organs at risk. International guidelines have been put in place because of the evidence for increased lifetime risk of breast and thyroid cancer. DeNaCaPST is based on these international recommendations but it is important to recognize that they are based on expert consensus opinion and are supported by neither nonrandomized observational studies nor prospective randomized trials in this specific population. Over-diagnosis is a phenomenon inherent in any screening program and therefore such programs must be evaluated. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3318-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.
| | - Delphine Drui
- Department of endocrinology, CHU de Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Isabelle Doutriaux
- Department of radiology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - René Gauducheau, 44800, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Gérard Michel
- Service d'hématologie et oncologie pédiatrique, Hôpital d'enfants La Timone, Marseille, France.,Unité de recherche EA 3279, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Pascal Auquier
- Unité de recherche EA 3279, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.,Service de santé publique, assistance publique - hôpitaux de Marseille et université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Agnès Dumas
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Berger
- Claire Berger, hemato-oncology pediatric department, chu nord st Etienne, cedex, 42055, St Etienne, France
| | - Valérie Bernier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Sandrine Bohrer
- Oncology and Hematology Unit, CHU de Saint Denis de La Réunion, Saint Denis, France
| | | | - Bruno Filhon
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Pediatric oncology department, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Freycon
- Service d'hématologie et d'oncologie pédiatrique du CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Sylvie Helfre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Angela Jackson
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France
| | - Christine Kerr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Julie Leseur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Eugène-Marquis, Rennes, France
| | | | - Caroline Oudot
- Pediatric Oncology Department, Hôpital de la Mère et de l'Enfant, 87042, Limoges, France
| | - Claire Pluchard
- Pediatric Oncology Department, chu Reims, hôpital américain, Reims, France
| | | | | | - Céline Vigneron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre de lutte contre le Cancer Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Imaging Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, IR4M UMR8081, Université Paris Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Martin Schlumberger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Florent de Vathaire
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mbeutcha A, Chauveinc L, Bondiau PY, Chand ME, Durand M, Chevallier D, Amiel J, Kee DLC, Hannoun-Lévi JM. Salvage prostate re-irradiation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy or focal stereotactic body radiotherapy for local recurrence after definitive radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:49. [PMID: 28274241 PMCID: PMC5343540 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0789-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Optimal management of locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation therapy is still challenging. With the development of highly accurate radiotherapy devices, prostate salvage re-irradiation might generate lower toxicity rates than classical salvage therapies. We retrospectively evaluated the toxicity and the feasibility of a prostate re-irradiation after definitive radiation therapy failure. Two modalities were investigated: high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) on whole prostate gland and focal stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) using CyberKnife® linac. Methods Between 2011 and 2015, 28 patients with imaged and/or biopsy-proven intra-prostatic recurrence of cancer after definitive radiation therapy underwent a salvage re-irradiation using HDRB (n = 10) or focal SBRT (n = 18). The schedule of re-irradiation was 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Biological response (defined as post-salvage radiation PSA variation) and biochemical no-evidence of disease (bNED) were evaluated in the whole cohort. For patients who had a positive biological response after salvage radiation, biochemical recurrence (BCR) and survival after salvage radiotherapy were evaluated. Post-salvage toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 and were compared to baseline status. Results Within a median follow-up of 22.5 months (IQR = 8–42), 9 (90%) patients experienced a positive biological response after salvage HDRB and 5 (50%) remained bNED at the end of the follow-up. Among patients who initially responded to salvage HDRB, the BCR rate was 44.4% after a median interval of 19.5 months (IQR = 11.5–26). Only one patient experienced a transient grade 3 urinary complication. In the SBRT group, the median follow-up was 14.5 months (IQR = 7–23) and 10 (55.6%) out of the 18 patients remained bNED. Among the 15 patients who initially responded to salvage SBRT, 5 (33.3%) experienced a BCR. One patient experienced a transient grade 4 urinary complication. At the end of the follow-up, all evaluated patients had a urinary status grade variation ≤ +1 grade. No grade 3–4 digestive toxicity was observed. Conclusions Salvage prostate re-irradiation for locally recurrent cancer is feasible and generate low toxicities rates when using with HDRB or focal SBRT. However, further investigations are necessary to confirm these findings and to determine predictive features for patients who might benefit from such an approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Mbeutcha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Cancer Canter, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06189, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France.,Department of Urology, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Laurent Chauveinc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Hartmann, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Cancer Canter, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06189, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France
| | - Marie-Eve Chand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Cancer Canter, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06189, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France
| | - Matthieu Durand
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Daniel Chevallier
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Jean Amiel
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Daniel Lam Cham Kee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Cancer Canter, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06189, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Cancer Canter, University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, 33, avenue Valombrose, 06189, Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dumas A, Allodji R, Fresneau B, Valteau-Couanet D, El-Fayech C, Pacquement H, Laprie A, Nguyen TD, Bondiau PY, Diallo I, Guibout C, Rubino C, Haddy N, Oberlin O, Vassal G, de Vathaire F. The right to be forgotten: a change in access to insurance and loans after childhood cancer? J Cancer Surviv 2017; 11:431-437. [PMID: 28130711 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0600-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Access to insurance for a loan or a mortgage is an important issue for childhood cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to describe difficulties experienced by adult survivors. METHODS A total of 1920 survivors treated before the age of 18 in five French cancer centers responded to a questionnaire in 2010. Survivors who had tried to obtain a loan were asked if they had experienced difficulties, which were defined as experiencing rejection, higher premiums, or exclusions. The questionnaire investigated health problems related to the circulatory, respiratory, digestive, urinary, endocrine, hormonal, and nervous systems. Second tumors, diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, and stroke were ascertained from a physician's report or medical records. Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify the characteristics of survivors reporting difficulties. RESULTS Difficulties were experienced by 10.4% of those who had tried to obtain a small loan (n = 787) and by 30.1% of those who had tried to obtain a home loan (n = 909). Disclosure of childhood cancer to the insurer and amputation surgery were negatively associated with insurance accessibility, even when controlling for age, gender, education, health-related unemployment, familial situation, and severe or life-threatening conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, second cancers, or diabetes. CONCLUSION This study showed that the financial burden of cancer can extend decades after diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Thanks to a 2016 law, French cancer survivors no longer have to disclose their cancer to insurers after a fixed number of years. This law will probably lessen the socioeconomic burden of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnès Dumas
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France. .,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Rodrigue Allodji
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.,Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Hélène Pacquement
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Institut Curie, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Claudius Regaud, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Tan Dat Nguyen
- Radiotherapy Department, Centre Jean Godinot, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06100, Nice, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Catherine Guibout
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Rubino
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Odile Oberlin
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Gilles Vassal
- Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Cancer and Radiation team, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807, Villejuif, France.,Department of Clinical Research, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chaikh A, Docquière N, Bondiau PY, Balosso J. Impact of dose calculation models on radiotherapy outcomes and quality adjusted life years for lung cancer treatment: do we need to measure radiotherapy outcomes to tune the radiobiological parameters of a normal tissue complication probability model? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2016; 5:673-680. [PMID: 28149761 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.11.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The equivalent uniform dose (EUD) radiobiological model can be applied for lung cancer treatment plans to estimate the tumor control probability (TCP) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) using different dose calculation models. Then, based on the different calculated doses, the quality adjusted life years (QALY) score can be assessed versus the uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP) concept in order to predict the overall outcome of the different treatment plans. METHODS Nine lung cancer cases were included in this study. For the each patient, two treatments plans were generated. The doses were calculated respectively from pencil beam model, as pencil beam convolution (PBC) turning on 1D density correction with Modified Batho's (MB) method, and point kernel model as anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) using exactly the same prescribed dose, normalized to 100% at isocentre point inside the target and beam arrangements. The radiotherapy outcomes and QALY were compared. The bootstrap method was used to improve the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) estimation. Wilcoxon paired test was used to calculate P value. RESULTS Compared to AAA considered as more realistic, the PBCMB overestimated the TCP while underestimating NTCP, P<0.05. Thus the UTCP and the QALY score were also overestimated. CONCLUSIONS To correlate measured QALY's obtained from the follow-up of the patients with calculated QALY from DVH metrics, the more accurate dose calculation models should be first integrated in clinical use. Second, clinically measured outcomes are necessary to tune the parameters of the NTCP model used to link the treatment outcome with the QALY. Only after these two steps, the comparison and the ranking of different radiotherapy plans would be possible, avoiding over/under estimation of QALY and any other clinic-biological estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulhamid Chaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France; ; France HADRON National Research Infrastructure, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas Docquière
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- France HADRON National Research Infrastructure, Lyon, France; ; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France; ; France HADRON National Research Infrastructure, Lyon, France; ; University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lobón MJ, Bautista F, Riet F, Dhermain F, Canale S, Dufour C, Blauwblomme T, Zerah M, Beccaria K, Saint-Rose C, Puget S, Carrie C, Lartigau E, Bondiau PY, Valteau-Couanet D, Grill J, Bolle S. Re-irradiation of recurrent pediatric ependymoma: modalities and outcomes: a twenty-year survey. Springerplus 2016; 5:879. [PMID: 27386327 PMCID: PMC4920736 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2562-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Standard treatment for recurrent ependymomas is not defined. Re- irradiation has been proposed but its modalities and results are still to be explored. Patients and methods From June 1994 to December 2013, 32 pediatric patients with ependymoma were re-irradiated for local (n = 15) or metastatic (n = 17) relapses. Files were reviewed retrospectively. Results Local relapses were treated with hypofractionated focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT) (n = 8) or focal fractionated radiotherapy (FFRT) (n = 7). Metastatic relapses were treated with hypoFFRT (n = 3), FFRT (n = 3), spinal radiotherapy (n = 4) and craniospinal irradiation (CSI) (n = 7). Median PFS and OS after re-irradiation were 1.2 and 3.5 years respectively with a median follow-up of 2.1 years (0.2–11.4). For local relapses, median PFS was 2.5 years for patients treated with hypoFFRT versus 1.2 years for patients treated with FFRT (p = 0.2). For metastatic relapses, median PFS was 0.7 years for patients treated with focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT, FFRT, spinal radiotherapy) versus 6.8 years for patients treated with CSI (p = 0.073). 15 patients achieved greater PFS after second radiotherapy (RT2) than after first radiotherapy (RT1). 27 patients (84 %) had surgery before re-irradiation. PFS was better for patients with GTR before RT2 (14.7 vs 6.7 months) (p = 0.05). 5 patients developed radionecrosis; only one required corticosteroids. Conclusion Re-irradiation at relapse is a safe, feasible and potentially curative treatment. Metastatic relapse may require CSI even when isolated and re-operated. For local relapses, considering conflicting results in the literature, a randomized trial is warranted to explore fractionated focal radiotherapy versus hypofractionated focal irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jesus Lobón
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Francisco Bautista
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - François Riet
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| | - Frederic Dhermain
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| | - Sandra Canale
- Department of Radiology Gustave Roussy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| | - Christelle Dufour
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Thomas Blauwblomme
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Michel Zerah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Beccaria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | | | - Stephanie Puget
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Dominique Valteau-Couanet
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Jacques Grill
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Stephanie Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Paris Sud Villejuif, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Haddy N, Diallo S, El-Fayech C, Schwartz B, Pein F, Hawkins M, Veres C, Oberlin O, Guibout C, Pacquement H, Munzer M, N’Guyen TD, Bondiau PY, Berchery D, Laprie A, Scarabin PY, Jouven X, Bridier A, Koscielny S, Deutsch E, Diallo I, de Vathaire F. Cardiac Diseases Following Childhood Cancer Treatment. Circulation 2016; 133:31-8. [DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.016686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2015] [Accepted: 10/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background—
Cardiac disease (CD) is one of the major side effects of childhood cancer therapy, but until now little has been known about the relationship between the heart radiation dose (HRD) received during childhood and the risk of CD.
Methods and Results—
The cohort comprised 3162 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. Chemotherapy information was collected and HRD was estimated. There were 347 CDs in 234 patients, 156 of them were rated grade ≥3. Cox and Poisson regression models were used. The cumulative incidence of any type of CD at 40 years of age was 11.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5–12.7) and 7·4% (95% CI, 6.2–8.9) when only the CDs of grade ≥3 were considered. In comparison with patients who received no anthracycline and either no radiotherapy or an HRD<0·1Gy, the risk was multiplied by 18·4 (95% CI, 7.1–48.0) in patients who had received anthracycline and no radiotherapy or a HRD <0.1Gy, by 60.4 (95% CI, 22.4–163.0) in those who had received no anthracycline and an HRD≥30Gy, and 61.5 (95% CI, 19.6–192.8) in those who had received both anthracycline and an HRD≥30Gy.
Conclusions—
Survivors of childhood cancers treated with radiotherapy and anthracycline run a high dose-dependent risk of developing CD. CDs develop earlier in patients treated with anthracycline than in those treated without it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Haddy
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Stéphanie Diallo
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Boris Schwartz
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - François Pein
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Mike Hawkins
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Cristina Veres
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Odile Oberlin
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Catherine Guibout
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Hélène Pacquement
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Martine Munzer
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Tan Dat N’Guyen
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Delphine Berchery
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Anne Laprie
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Pierre-Yves Scarabin
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Xavier Jouven
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - André Bridier
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Serge Koscielny
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Eric Deutsch
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- From Radiation Epidemiology Group, INSERM, UMR1018, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., S.K., I.D., F.d.V.); Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., O.O., C.G., A.B., S.K., E.D., I.D., F.d.V.); Université Paris XI, Villejuif, France (N.H., C.E.-F., B.S., C.V., C.G., I.D., F.d.V.); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Service Pharmacie, Gonesse, France (S.D.); Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, site René Gauducheau CLCC Nantes-Atlantique, Département de
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
de Vathaire F, Haddy N, Allodji RS, Hawkins M, Guibout C, El-Fayech C, Teinturier C, Oberlin O, Pacquement H, Diop F, Kalhouche A, Benadjaoud M, Winter D, Jackson A, Bezin Mai-Quynh G, Benabdennebi A, Llanas D, Veres C, Munzer M, Nguyen TD, Bondiau PY, Berchery D, Laprie A, Deutsch E, Lefkopoulos D, Schlumberger M, Diallo I, Rubino C. Thyroid Radiation Dose and Other Risk Factors of Thyroid Carcinoma Following Childhood Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:4282-90. [PMID: 26327481 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-1690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Thyroid carcinoma is a frequent complication of childhood cancer radiotherapy. The dose response to thyroid radiation dose is now well established, but the potential modifier effect of other factors requires additional investigation. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the role of potential modifiers of the dose response. DESIGN We followed a cohort of 4338 5-year survivors of solid childhood cancer treated before 1986 over an average of 27 years. The dose received by the thyroid gland and some other anatomical sites during radiotherapy was estimated after reconstruction of the actual conditions in which irradiation was delivered. RESULTS Fifty-five patients developed thyroid carcinoma. The risk of thyroid carcinoma increased with a radiation dose to the thyroid of up to two tenths of Gy, then leveled off for higher doses. When taking into account the thyroid radiation dose, a surgical or radiological splenectomy (>20 Gy to the spleen) increased thyroid cancer risk (relative risk [RR] = 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.0), high radiation doses (>5 Gy) to pituitary gland lowered this risk (RR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.6). Patients who received nitrosourea chemotherapy had a 6.6-fold (95% CI, 2.5-15.7) higher risk than those who did not. The excess RR per Gy of radiation to the thyroid was 4.7 (95% CI, 1.7-22.6). It was 7.6 (95% CI, 1.6-33.3) if body mass index at time of interview was equal or higher than 25 kg/m(2), and 4.1 (95% CI, 0.9-17.7) if not (P for interaction = .1). CONCLUSION Predicting thyroid cancer risk following childhood cancer radiation therapy probably requires the assessment of more than just the radiation dose to the thyroid. Chemotherapy, splenectomy, radiation dose to pituitary gland, and obesity also play a role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent de Vathaire
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Rodrigue S Allodji
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Mike Hawkins
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Catherine Guibout
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Chiraz El-Fayech
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Cécile Teinturier
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Odile Oberlin
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Hélène Pacquement
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Fara Diop
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Amar Kalhouche
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Mohamedamine Benadjaoud
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - David Winter
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Angela Jackson
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Giao Bezin Mai-Quynh
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Aymen Benabdennebi
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Damien Llanas
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Martine Munzer
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Tan Dat Nguyen
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Delphine Berchery
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Dimitri Lefkopoulos
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Martin Schlumberger
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| | - Carole Rubino
- Radiation Epidemiology Group (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., I.D., C.R.), INSERM U1018 Villejuif, F-94805, France; Institut Gustave Roussy (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., D.L., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94805, France; Université Paris-Sud (F.d.V., N.H., R.S.A., C.G., C.E.-F., C.T., O.O., F.D., A.K., M.B., A.J., G.B.M.-Q., A.B., D.L., C.V., E.D., M.S., I.D., C.R.), Villejuif, F-94800, France; Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology (M.H., D.W.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institut Curie (H.P.), Paris F-75005 Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot (M.M., T.D.N.), F-51092 Reims, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne (P.-Y.B.), F-06100 Nice, France; and Centre Claudius Régaud (D.B., A.L.), F-51100 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
ElAlfy E, Bondiau PY, Rostom YA, Benezery K, Doyen J. Results of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for management of primary and secondary hepatic tumors: Analysis of early outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e15160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eman ElAlfy
- Medical Research Institute Hospital Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schwartz B, Benadjaoud MA, Cléro E, Haddy N, El-Fayech C, Guibout C, Teinturier C, Oberlin O, Veres C, Pacquement H, Munzer M, N'guyen TD, Bondiau PY, Berchery D, Laprie A, Hawkins M, Winter D, Lefkopoulos D, Chavaudra J, Rubino C, Diallo I, Bénichou J, de Vathaire F. Risk of second bone sarcoma following childhood cancer: role of radiation therapy treatment. Radiat Environ Biophys 2014; 53:381-90. [PMID: 24419490 PMCID: PMC3996275 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-013-0510-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2013] [Accepted: 12/23/2013] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Bone sarcoma as a second malignancy is rare but highly fatal. The present knowledge about radiation-absorbed organ dose-response is insufficient to predict the risks induced by radiation therapy techniques. The objective of the present study was to assess the treatment-induced risk for bone sarcoma following a childhood cancer and particularly the related risk of radiotherapy. Therefore, a retrospective cohort of 4,171 survivors of a solid childhood cancer treated between 1942 and 1986 in France and Britain has been followed prospectively. We collected detailed information on treatments received during childhood cancer. Additionally, an innovative methodology has been developed to evaluate the dose-response relationship between bone sarcoma and radiation dose throughout this cohort. The median follow-up was 26 years, and 39 patients had developed bone sarcoma. It was found that the overall incidence was 45-fold higher [standardized incidence ratio 44.8, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 31.0-59.8] than expected from the general population, and the absolute excess risk was 35.1 per 100,000 person-years (95 % CI 24.0-47.1). The risk of bone sarcoma increased slowly up to a cumulative radiation organ absorbed dose of 15 Gy [hazard ratio (HR) = 8.2, 95 % CI 1.6-42.9] and then strongly increased for higher radiation doses (HR for 30 Gy or more 117.9, 95 % CI 36.5-380.6), compared with patients not treated with radiotherapy. A linear model with an excess relative risk per Gy of 1.77 (95 % CI 0.6213-5.935) provided a close fit to the data. These findings have important therapeutic implications: Lowering the radiation dose to the bones should reduce the incidence of secondary bone sarcomas. Other therapeutic solutions should be preferred to radiotherapy in bone sarcoma-sensitive areas.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Bone Neoplasms/chemically induced
- Bone Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Bone Neoplasms/etiology
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Cohort Studies
- Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
- Female
- Humans
- Infant
- Infant, Newborn
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Models, Statistical
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/chemically induced
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/chemically induced
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology
- Radiotherapy/adverse effects
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Risk
- Sarcoma/chemically induced
- Sarcoma/epidemiology
- Sarcoma/etiology
- Survivors
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Schwartz
- Radiation Epidemiology Group, Unit 1018 INSERM, Institut Gustave Roussy, Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Marcy PY, Palussière J, Descamps B, Magné N, Bondiau PY, Ciais C, Bruneton JN. Erratum to Percutaneous cementoplasty for pelvic bone metastasis. Support Care Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s005200000188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
38
|
Lartigau EF, Tresch E, Thariat J, Graff P, Coche-Dequeant B, Benezery K, Schiappacasse L, Degardin M, Bondiau PY, Peiffert D, Lefebvre JL, Lacornerie T, Kramar A. Multi institutional phase II study of concomitant stereotactic reirradiation and cetuximab for recurrent head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:281-5. [PMID: 24262821 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2013] [Revised: 07/17/2013] [Accepted: 08/07/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recurrent head and neck cancer is associated to a poor survival prognosis. A high toxicity rate is demonstrated when surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy are combined. Furthermore, the duration of treatment is often not ethically compatible with the expected survival (median survival<1year). Normal tissues tolerance limits the use of reirradiation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could offer precise irradiation while sparing healthy tissues. After completion of a feasibility study, results of a multicentric study (Lille, Nancy & Nice) using SBRT with cetuximab are reported. The aim of the study was to deliver non toxic short course SBRT (2weeks) in order to get the same local control as the one demonstrated with longer protocols. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with inoperable recurrent, or new primary tumor in a previously irradiated area, were included (WHO<3). Reirradiation (RT) dose was 36Gy in six fractions of 6Gy to the 85% isodose line covering 95% of the PTV with 5 injections of concomitant cetuximab (CT). All patients had previous radiotherapy, 85% had previous surgery and 48% previous chemotherapy. RESULTS Between 11/2007 and 08/2010, 60 were included (46 men and 14 women), 56 received CT+RT, 3 were not treated and 1 received only CT. Median age was 60 (42-87)) and all 56 patients had squamous carcinoma and received concomitant cetuximab. Mean time between previous radiotherapy and the start of SBRT was 38months. Cutaneous toxicity was observed for 41 patients. There was one toxic death from hemorrhage and denutrition. Median follow-up was 11.4months. At 3months, response rate was 58.4% (95% CI: 43.2-72.4%) and disease control rate was 91.7% (95% CI: 80.0-97.7%). The one-year OS rate was 47.5% (95% CI: 30.8-62.4). CONCLUSION These results suggest that short SBRT with cetuximab is an effective salvage treatment with good response rate in this poor prognosis population with previously irradiated HNC. Treatment is feasible and, with appropriate care to limiting critical structure, acute toxicities are acceptable. This combination may be the reference treatment is this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric F Lartigau
- Centre Oscar Lambret, University Lille II & ONCOLille Consortium, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bondiau PY, Courdi A, Bahadoran P, Chamorey E, Queille-Roussel C, Lallement M, Birtwisle-Peyrottes I, Chapellier C, Pacquelet-Cheli S, Ferrero JM. Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Concomitant With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85:1193-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Revised: 10/12/2012] [Accepted: 10/22/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
40
|
Poudenx M, Bondiau PY, Chamorey E, Venissac N, Otto J, Pourel N, Castelnau O, Tessier E, De Surmont Salasc B, Berdah JF, Pop D, Michel C, Mouroux J. Cisplatin-docetaxel induction plus concurrent 3-D conformal radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase II trial. Oncology 2012; 83:321-8. [PMID: 22986621 DOI: 10.1159/000342081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2012] [Accepted: 07/23/2012] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) is the standard of care for unresectable locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer. However, the optimal combination remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 induction chemotherapy cycles (days 1 and 22) with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) followed by concurrent chemotherapy (weekly docetaxel-cisplatin, 20 mg/m(2)) and 3-D conformal radiotherapy for 6 weeks (66 Gy/5 fractions per week/2 Gy per fraction). The primary endpoint was the response rate. Secondary objectives were toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. Forty-four patients were included and 40 were eligible. The mean age was 60.5 years (range 40.7-72.1), and 75% had stage IIIB disease. Six patients underwent complete R0 resection including 2 pathologic complete responses after a planned intermediate evaluation. Thirty-three patients completed CHRT. The objective response rate was 65% (95% CI 50.2-79.8). Grade 3-4 hematologic and digestive toxicities were observed mainly during the induction phase. Grade 3 esophagitis (5%) was experienced during CHRT. With a median follow-up of 38.7 months, the median progression-free survival was 28.3 months (95% CI 11.0-35.0) and the median survival rate was 31.4 months. Cisplatin-docetaxel induction followed by concurrent 3-D conformal radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy is a feasible protocol associated with a promising response rate and acceptable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Poudenx
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France. michel.poudenx @ nice.unicancer.fr
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lang-Lazdunski L, Barrington S, Bille A, Bondiau PY. Cyberknife radiosurgery for focal paravertebral recurrence after radical pleurectomy/decortication in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41:1393-4. [PMID: 22290898 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
We present a case of malignant pleural mesothelioma with focal relapse in the Azygos arch region after radical pleurectomy/decortication and adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumour recurrence was successfully treated by Cyberknife radiosurgery (70 Gy in five fractions). Patient remains disease-free at 40 months without any other treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïc Lang-Lazdunski
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Braccini AL, Bondiau PY, Litrico S, Burel-Vandenbos F, Thyss A. Long term survival of an atlas osteosarcoma treated by surgery, chemotherapy and robotic stereotactic radiotherapy: a case report. Radiother Oncol 2010; 97:608-9. [PMID: 21074877 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2010] [Accepted: 10/19/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
43
|
Pop D, Venissac N, Bondiau PY, Mouroux J. Peroperative fiducial placement for postoperative stereotactic Cyberknife radiosurgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10:1034-6. [DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
44
|
Konukoglu E, Clatz O, Bondiau PY, Delingette H, Ayache N. Extrapolating glioma invasion margin in brain magnetic resonance images: suggesting new irradiation margins. Med Image Anal 2009; 14:111-25. [PMID: 20042359 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2009.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2008] [Revised: 10/12/2009] [Accepted: 11/23/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy for brain glioma treatment relies on magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images. These images provide information on the spatial extent of the tumor, but can only visualize parts of the tumor where cancerous cells are dense enough, masking the low density infiltration. In radiotherapy, a 2 m constant margin around the tumor is taken to account for this uncertainty. This approach however, does not consider the growth dynamics of gliomas, particularly the differential motility of tumor cells in the white and in the gray matter. In this article, we propose a novel method for estimating the full extent of the tumor infiltration starting from its visible mass in the patients' MR images. This estimation problem is a time independent problem where we do not have information about the temporal evolution of the pathology nor its initial conditions. Based on the reaction-diffusion models widely used in the literature, we derive a method to solve this extrapolation problem. Later, we use this formulation to tailor new tumor specific variable irradiation margins. We perform geometrical comparisons between the conventional constant and the proposed variable margins through determining the amount of targeted tumor cells and healthy tissue in the case of synthetic tumors. Results of these experiments suggest that the variable margin could be more effective at targeting cancerous cells and preserving healthy tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ender Konukoglu
- Asclepios Research Project-INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902, Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gibbs IC, Levendag PC, Fariselli L, Bondiau PY, Lartigau E, Loo BW, Gagnon GJ, Koong A. Re: “The safety and efficacy of robotic image-guided radiosurgery system treatment for intra- and extracranial lesions: A systematic review of the literature” [Radiotherapy and Oncology 89 (2009) 245–253]. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93:656-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2009] [Accepted: 08/14/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
46
|
Peyrade F, Triby C, Slama B, Fontana X, Gressin R, Broglia JM, Lepeu G, Carrier P, Peyrottes I, Darcourt J, Bondiau PY, Thyss A. Radioimmunotherapy in relapsed follicular lymphoma previously treated by autologous bone marrow transplant: a report of eight new cases and literature review. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 49:1762-8. [DOI: 10.1080/10428190802273278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
47
|
Barrière J, Thariat J, Vandenbos F, Bondiau PY, Peyrottes I, Peyrade F. Diplopia as the first symptom of an aggressive metastatic rectal stromal tumor. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 32:345-7. [PMID: 19521122 DOI: 10.1159/000215712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms, and metastatic disease is present at diagnosis in about 50%. Most common metastatic sites are the liver, the lungs, and the peritoneum. Bony metastases are uncommon and of unknown prognosis. CASE REPORT A 57-year-old man presented with diplopia due to a clival metastastic lesion from an asymptomatic rectal stromal tumor. This patient also had liver and vertebral metastases. Treatment with imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, led to a partial response of the primary tumor and hepatic metastasis, but the patient developed aggressive bone metastases that proved refractory to 3 different tyrosine kinase inhibitors. CONCLUSION Different drug distribution or different mutation patterns of key prognostic receptors (e.g. cKIT receptor) in bone and soft tissues may explain the unusually aggressive pattern of these bony metastases of a GIST. Pharmacodynamic and molecular investigations are warranted to check these hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Barrière
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bondiau PY, Bahadoran P, Lallement M, Birtwisle-Peyrottes I, Chapellier C, Chamorey E, Courdi A, Quielle-Roussel C, Thariat J, Ferrero JM. Robotic stereotactic radioablation concomitant with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75:1041-7. [PMID: 19386428 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2008] [Revised: 12/11/2008] [Accepted: 12/11/2008] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Robotic stereotactic radioablation (RSR) allows stereotactic irradiation of thoracic tumors; however, it has never been used for breast tumors and may have a real potential. We conducted a Phase I study, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), a two-level dose-escalation study (6.5 Gy x 3 fractions and 7.5 Gy x 3 fractions) using RSR and breast-conserving surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS To define toxicity, we performed a dermatologic exam (DE) including clinical examination by two independent observers and technical examination by colorimetry, dermoscopy, and skin ultrasound. DE was performed before NACT (DE0), at 36 days (DE1), at 56 days (DE2), after the NACT treatment onset, and before surgery (DE3). Surgery was performed 4-8 weeks after the last chemotherapy session. A pathologic examination was also performed. RESULTS There were two clinical complete responses and four clinical partial responses at D56 and D85. Maximum tolerable dose was not reached. All patients tolerated RSR with no fatigue; 2 patients presented with mild pain after the third fraction of the treatment. There was no significant toxicity measured with ultrasound and dermoscopy tests. Postoperative irradiation (50 Gy) has been delivered without toxicity. CONCLUSION The study showed the feasibility of irradiation with RSR combined with chemotherapy and surgery for breast tumors. There was no skin toxicity at a dose of 19.5 Gy or 22.5 Gy delivered in three fractions combined with chemotherapy. Lack of toxicity suggested that the dose could be increased further. Pathologic response was acceptable.
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
For para- and intraspinal tumors, precise spinal cord delineation is critical for CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) stereotactic radiotherapy. We evaluated whether computed tomographic (CT) myelography is superior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for accurate spinal cord delineation. Treatment parameters and short-term outcome and toxicity are also presented.
METHODS
The planning CT scan, the gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted, 3-dimensional (3D) fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition MRI scan, and the CT myelogram were fused before volume-of-interest delineation. The planning target volume margin was less than 1 mm using the Xsight Spine tracking system (Accuray). We present data from 11 heavily pretreated patients who underwent CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery between November 2006 and January 2008.
RESULTS
Spatial resolution was 0.46 and 0.93 mm/pixel for CT myelography and 3D-fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition MRI, respectively. The contrast between cerebrospinal fluid and spinal cord was excellent with CT myelography. A transient postmyelography headache occurred in 1 patient. The mean gross tumor volume was 51.1 mL. The mean prescribed dose was 34 Gy in 4 fractions (range, 2–7 fractions) with 147 beams (range, 79–232 beams) to the 75% reference isodose line (range, 68–80%), covering 95% (range, 86–99%) of the gross tumor volume with a mean conformity index of 1.4 (range, 1.1–1.8). No short-term toxicity on the spinal cord was noted at 1- to 6-months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION
CT myelography was more accurate for spinal cord delineation than 3D-fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition MRI (used for its myelographic effect), particularly in the presence of ferromagnetic artifacts in heavily pretreated patients or in patients with severe spinal compression. Because other MRI sequences (T2 and gadolinium-enhanced T1) provide excellent tumor characterization, we suggest trimodality imaging for spinal tumor treatment to yield submillimetric delineation accuracy. Combined with CyberKnife technology, CT myelography can improve the feasibility of dose escalation or reirradiation of spinal tumors in selected patients, thereby increasing local control while avoiding myelopathy. Further follow-up and prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Anti-Cancer Center, Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
| | - Joel Castelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Anti-Cancer Center, Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
| | - Stephane Chanalet
- Department of Radiodiagnostics, University Hospital Pasteur, Nice, France
| | - Serge Marcie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Anti-Cancer Center, Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
| | - Hamid Mammar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Anti-Cancer Center, Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Anti-Cancer Center, Sophia Antipolis University, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bondiau PY, Clatz O, Sermesant M, Marcy PY, Delingette H, Frenay M, Ayache N. Biocomputing: numerical simulation of glioblastoma growth using diffusion tensor imaging. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:879-93. [PMID: 18263946 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive tumors of the central nervous system. It can be represented by two components: a proliferative component with a mass effect on brain structures and an invasive component. GBM has a distinct pattern of spread showing a preferential growth in the white fiber direction for the invasive component. By using the architecture of white matter fibers, we propose a new model to simulate the growth of GBM. This architecture is estimated by diffusion tensor imaging in order to determine the preferred direction for the diffusion component. It is then coupled with a mechanical component. To set up our growth model, we make a brain atlas including brain structures with a distinct response to tumor aggressiveness, white fiber diffusion tensor information and elasticity. In this atlas, we introduce a virtual GBM with a mechanical component coupled with a diffusion component. These two components are complementary, and can be tuned independently. Then, we tune the parameter set of our model with an MRI patient. We have compared simulated growth (initialized with the MRI patient) with observed growth six months later. The average and the odd ratio of image difference between observed and simulated images are computed. Displacements of reference points are compared to those simulated by the model. The results of our simulation have shown a good correlation with tumor growth, as observed on an MRI patient. Different tumor aggressiveness can also be simulated by tuning additional parameters. This work has demonstrated that modeling the complex behavior of brain tumors is feasible and will account for further validation of this new conceptual approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Yves Bondiau
- Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique, Sophia Antipolis, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|