1
|
Bakouny Z, Labaki C, Grover P, Awosika J, Gulati S, Hsu CY, Alimohamed SI, Bashir B, Berg S, Bilen MA, Bowles D, Castellano C, Desai A, Elkrief A, Eton OE, Fecher LA, Flora D, Galsky MD, Gatti-Mays ME, Gesenhues A, Glover MJ, Gopalakrishnan D, Gupta S, Halfdanarson TR, Hayes-Lattin B, Hendawi M, Hsu E, Hwang C, Jandarov R, Jani C, Johnson DB, Joshi M, Khan H, Khan SA, Knox N, Koshkin VS, Kulkarni AA, Kwon DH, Matar S, McKay RR, Mishra S, Moria FA, Nizam A, Nock NL, Nonato TK, Panasci J, Pomerantz L, Portuguese AJ, Provenzano D, Puc M, Rao YJ, Rhodes TD, Riely GJ, Ripp JJ, Rivera AV, Ruiz-Garcia E, Schmidt AL, Schoenfeld AJ, Schwartz GK, Shah SA, Shaya J, Subbiah S, Tachiki LM, Tucker MD, Valdez-Reyes M, Weissmann LB, Wotman MT, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Xie Z, Yang YJ, Thompson MA, Shah DP, Warner JL, Shyr Y, Choueiri TK, Wise-Draper TM, Gandhi R, Gartrell BA, Goel S, Halmos B, Makower DF, O' Sullivan D, Ohri N, Portes M, Shapiro LC, Shastri A, Sica RA, Verma AK, Butt O, Campian JL, Fiala MA, Henderson JP, Monahan RS, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Zhou AY, Bitran JD, Hallmeyer S, Mundt D, Pandravada S, Papaioannou PV, Patel M, Streckfuss M, Tadesse E, Gatson NTN, Kundranda MN, Lammers PE, Loree JM, Yu IS, Bindal P, Lam B, Peters MLB, Piper-Vallillo AJ, Egan PC, Farmakiotis D, Arvanitis P, Klein EJ, Olszewski AJ, Vieira K, Angevine AH, Bar MH, Del Prete SA, Fiebach MZ, Gulati AP, Hatton E, Houston K, Rose SJ, Steve Lo KM, Stratton J, Weinstein PL, Garcia JA, Routy B, Hoyo-Ulloa I, Dawsey SJ, Lemmon CA, Pennell NA, Sharifi N, Painter CA, Granada C, Hoppenot C, Li A, Bitterman DS, Connors JM, Demetri GD, Florez (Duma) N, Freeman DA, Giordano A, Morgans AK, Nohria A, Saliby RM, Tolaney SM, Van Allen EM, Xu WV, Zon RL, Halabi S, Zhang T, Dzimitrowicz H, Leighton JC, Graber JJ, Grivas P, Hawley JE, Loggers ET, Lyman GH, Lynch RC, Nakasone ES, Schweizer MT, Vinayak S, Wagner MJ, Yeh A, Dansoa Y, Makary M, Manikowski JJ, Vadakara J, Yossef K, Beckerman J, Goyal S, Messing I, Rosenstein LJ, Steffes DR, Alsamarai S, Clement JM, Cosin JA, Daher A, Dailey ME, Elias R, Fein JA, Hosmer W, Jayaraj A, Mather J, Menendez AG, Nadkarni R, Serrano OK, Yu PP, Balanchivadze N, Gadgeel SM, Accordino MK, Bhutani D, Bodin BE, Hershman DL, Masson C, Alexander M, Mushtaq S, Reuben DY, Bernicker EH, Deeken JF, Jeffords KJ, Shafer D, Cárdenas AI, Cuervo Campos R, De-la-Rosa-Martinez D, Ramirez A, Vilar-Compte D, Gill DM, Lewis MA, Low CA, Jones MM, Mansoor AH, Mashru SH, Werner MA, Cohen AM, McWeeney S, Nemecek ER, Williamson SP, Peters S, Smith SJ, Lewis GC, Zaren HA, Akhtari M, Castillo DR, Cortez K, Lau E, Nagaraj G, Park K, Reeves ME, O'Connor TE, Altman J, Gurley M, Mulcahy MF, Wehbe FH, Durbin EB, Nelson HH, Ramesh V, Sachs Z, Wilson G, Bardia A, Boland G, Gainor JF, Peppercorn J, Reynolds KL, Rosovsky RP, Zubiri L, Bekaii-Saab TS, Joyner MJ, Riaz IB, Senefeld JW, Shah S, Ayre SK, Bonnen M, Mahadevan D, McKeown C, Mesa RA, Ramirez AG, Salazar M, Shah PK, Wang CP, Bouganim N, Papenburg J, Sabbah A, Tagalakis V, Vinh DC, Nanchal R, Singh H, Bahadur N, Bao T, Belenkaya R, Nambiar PH, O’Cearbhaill RE, Papadopoulos EB, Philip J, Robson M, Rosenberg JE, Wilkins CR, Tamimi R, Cerrone K, Dill J, Faller BA, Alomar ME, Chandrasekhar SA, Hume EC, Islam JY, Ajmera A, Brouha SS, Cabal A, Choi S, Hsiao A, Jiang JY, Kligerman S, Park J, Razavi P, Reid EG, Bhatt PS, Mariano MG, Thomson CC, Glace M(G, Knoble JL, Rink C, Zacks R, Blau SH, Brown C, Cantrell AS, Namburi S, Polimera HV, Rovito MA, Edwin N, Herz K, Kennecke HF, Monfared A, Sautter RR, Cronin T, Elshoury A, Fleissner B, Griffiths EA, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Jain P, Kariapper A, Levine E, Moffitt M, O'Connor TL, Smith LJ, Wicher CP, Zsiros E, Jabbour SK, Misdary CF, Shah MR, Batist G, Cook E, Ferrario C, Lau S, Miller WH, Rudski L, Santos Dutra M, Wilchesky M, Mahmood SZ, McNair C, Mico V, Dixon B, Kloecker G, Logan BB, Mandapakala C, Cabebe EC, Jha A, Khaki AR, Nagpal S, Schapira L, Wu JTY, Whaley D, Lopes GDL, de Cardenas K, Russell K, Stith B, Taylor S, Klamerus JF, Revankar SG, Addison D, Chen JL, Haynam M, Jhawar SR, Karivedu V, Palmer JD, Pillainayagam C, Stover DG, Wall S, Williams NO, Abbasi SH, Annis S, Balmaceda NB, Greenland S, Kasi A, Rock CD, Luders M, Smits M, Weiss M, Chism DD, Owenby S, Ang C, Doroshow DB, Metzger M, Berenberg J, Uyehara C, Fazio A, Huber KE, Lashley LN, Sueyoshi MH, Patel KG, Riess J, Borno HT, Small EJ, Zhang S, Andermann TM, Jensen CE, Rubinstein SM, Wood WA, Ahmad SA, Brownfield L, Heilman H, Kharofa J, Latif T, Marcum M, Shaikh HG, Sohal DPS, Abidi M, Geiger CL, Markham MJ, Russ AD, Saker H, Acoba JD, Choi H, Rho YS, Feldman LE, Gantt G, Hoskins KF, Khan M, Liu LC, Nguyen RH, Pasquinelli MM, Schwartz C, Venepalli NK, Vikas P, Zakharia Y, Friese CR, Boldt A, Gonzalez CJ, Su C, Su CT, Yoon JJ, Bijjula R, Mavromatis BH, Seletyn ME, Wood BR, Zaman QU, Kaklamani V, Beeghly A, Brown AJ, Charles LJ, Cheng A, Crispens MA, Croessmann S, Davis EJ, Ding T, Duda SN, Enriquez KT, French B, Gillaspie EA, Hausrath DJ, Hennessy C, Lewis JT, Li X(L, Prescott LS, Reid SA, Saif S, Slosky DA, Solorzano CC, Sun T, Vega-Luna K, Wang LL, Aboulafia DM, Carducci TM, Goldsmith KJ, Van Loon S, Topaloglu U, Moore J, Rice RL, Cabalona WD, Cyr S, Barrow McCollough B, Peddi P, Rosen LR, Ravindranathan D, Hafez N, Herbst RS, LoRusso P, Lustberg MB, Masters T, Stratton C. Interplay of Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy Among Patients With Cancer and COVID-19. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:128-134. [PMID: 36326731 PMCID: PMC9634600 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Importance Cytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation. Objective To determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings. Exposures Immunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm. Results The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chris Labaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Punita Grover
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Joy Awosika
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Shuchi Gulati
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Chih-Yuan Hsu
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Saif I Alimohamed
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Babar Bashir
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Aakash Desai
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arielle Elkrief
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Omar E Eton
- Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mohamed Hendawi
- Aurora Cancer Center, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Emily Hsu
- Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Clara Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Roman Jandarov
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | - Monika Joshi
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Hina Khan
- Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Shaheer A Khan
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Natalie Knox
- Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- UCSF, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | | | - Daniel H Kwon
- UCSF, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - Sara Matar
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, UCSD, San Diego, California
| | - Sanjay Mishra
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Feras A Moria
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Nora L Nock
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Justin Panasci
- Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Yuan J Rao
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Jacob J Ripp
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Andrea V Rivera
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Andrew L Schmidt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Gary K Schwartz
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | - Justin Shaya
- Moores Cancer Center, UCSD, San Diego, California
| | - Suki Subbiah
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, LSU, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Lisa M Tachiki
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhuoer Xie
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael A Thompson
- Aurora Cancer Center, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.,Tempus Labs, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dimpy P Shah
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Yu Shyr
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Trisha M Wise-Draper
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Omar Butt
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ang Li
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Lau
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | - Kyu Park
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ting Bao
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ji Park
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Erin Cook
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | - Susie Lau
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anup Kasi
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Li C Liu
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chris Su
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tan Ding
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara Saif
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tolaney S, Chan A, Petrakova K, Delaloge S, Campone M, Iwata H, Peddi P, Kaufman P, de Kermadec E, Liu Q, Cohen P, Paux G, Im SA. 212MO AMEERA-3, a phase II study of amcenestrant (AMC) versus endocrine treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with endocrine-resistant ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (aBC). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
3
|
Grivas P, Khaki AR, Wise-Draper TM, French B, Hennessy C, Hsu CY, Shyr Y, Li X, Choueiri TK, Painter CA, Peters S, Rini BI, Thompson MA, Mishra S, Rivera DR, Acoba JD, Abidi MZ, Bakouny Z, Bashir B, Bekaii-Saab T, Berg S, Bernicker EH, Bilen MA, Bindal P, Bishnoi R, Bouganim N, Bowles DW, Cabal A, Caimi PF, Chism DD, Crowell J, Curran C, Desai A, Dixon B, Doroshow DB, Durbin EB, Elkrief A, Farmakiotis D, Fazio A, Fecher LA, Flora DB, Friese CR, Fu J, Gadgeel SM, Galsky MD, Gill DM, Glover MJ, Goyal S, Grover P, Gulati S, Gupta S, Halabi S, Halfdanarson TR, Halmos B, Hausrath DJ, Hawley JE, Hsu E, Huynh-Le M, Hwang C, Jani C, Jayaraj A, Johnson DB, Kasi A, Khan H, Koshkin VS, Kuderer NM, Kwon DH, Lammers PE, Li A, Loaiza-Bonilla A, Low CA, Lustberg MB, Lyman GH, McKay RR, McNair C, Menon H, Mesa RA, Mico V, Mundt D, Nagaraj G, Nakasone ES, Nakayama J, Nizam A, Nock NL, Park C, Patel JM, Patel KG, Peddi P, Pennell NA, Piper-Vallillo AJ, Puc M, Ravindranathan D, Reeves ME, Reuben DY, Rosenstein L, Rosovsky RP, Rubinstein SM, Salazar M, Schmidt AL, Schwartz GK, Shah MR, Shah SA, Shah C, Shaya JA, Singh SRK, Smits M, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Stover DG, Streckfuss M, Subbiah S, Tachiki L, Tadesse E, Thakkar A, Tucker MD, Verma AK, Vinh DC, Weiss M, Wu JT, Wulff-Burchfield E, Xie Z, Yu PP, Zhang T, Zhou AY, Zhu H, Zubiri L, Shah DP, Warner JL, Lopes G. Association of clinical factors and recent anticancer therapy with COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer: a report from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:787-800. [PMID: 33746047 PMCID: PMC7972830 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer may be at high risk of adverse outcomes from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We analyzed a cohort of patients with cancer and coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) to identify prognostic clinical factors, including laboratory measurements and anticancer therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with active or historical cancer and a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis recorded between 17 March and 18 November 2020 were included. The primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on an ordinal scale (uncomplicated, hospitalized, admitted to intensive care unit, mechanically ventilated, died within 30 days). Multivariable regression models included demographics, cancer status, anticancer therapy and timing, COVID-19-directed therapies, and laboratory measurements (among hospitalized patients). RESULTS A total of 4966 patients were included (median age 66 years, 51% female, 50% non-Hispanic white); 2872 (58%) were hospitalized and 695 (14%) died; 61% had cancer that was present, diagnosed, or treated within the year prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Older age, male sex, obesity, cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, non-Hispanic black race, Hispanic ethnicity, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, recent cytotoxic chemotherapy, and hematologic malignancy were associated with higher COVID-19 severity. Among hospitalized patients, low or high absolute lymphocyte count; high absolute neutrophil count; low platelet count; abnormal creatinine; troponin; lactate dehydrogenase; and C-reactive protein were associated with higher COVID-19 severity. Patients diagnosed early in the COVID-19 pandemic (January-April 2020) had worse outcomes than those diagnosed later. Specific anticancer therapies (e.g. R-CHOP, platinum combined with etoposide, and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors) were associated with high 30-day all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS Clinical factors (e.g. older age, hematological malignancy, recent chemotherapy) and laboratory measurements were associated with poor outcomes among patients with cancer and COVID-19. Although further studies are needed, caution may be required in utilizing particular anticancer therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER NCT04354701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Grivas
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA.
| | - A R Khaki
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA; Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | | | - B French
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - C Hennessy
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - C-Y Hsu
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Y Shyr
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - X Li
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | | | - C A Painter
- Broad Institute, Cancer Program, Cambridge, USA
| | - S Peters
- Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - B I Rini
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | | | - S Mishra
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - D R Rivera
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA
| | - J D Acoba
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - M Z Abidi
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
| | - Z Bakouny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - B Bashir
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - S Berg
- Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, USA
| | | | - M A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - P Bindal
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - R Bishnoi
- University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - N Bouganim
- McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - D W Bowles
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
| | - A Cabal
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, USA
| | - P F Caimi
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, USA; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - D D Chism
- Thompson Cancer Survival Center, Knoxville, USA
| | - J Crowell
- St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Edgewood, USA
| | - C Curran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - A Desai
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | - B Dixon
- St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Edgewood, USA
| | - D B Doroshow
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - E B Durbin
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
| | - A Elkrief
- McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - D Farmakiotis
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
| | - A Fazio
- Tufts Medical Center Cancer Center, Boston and Stoneham, USA
| | - L A Fecher
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - D B Flora
- St. Elizabeth Healthcare, Edgewood, USA
| | - C R Friese
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - J Fu
- Tufts Medical Center Cancer Center, Boston and Stoneham, USA
| | - S M Gadgeel
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | - M D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - D M Gill
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | - S Goyal
- George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
| | - P Grover
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, USA
| | - S Gulati
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, USA
| | - S Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, USA
| | | | | | - B Halmos
- Albert Einstein Cancer Center/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | - D J Hausrath
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - J E Hawley
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - E Hsu
- Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, USA; University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA
| | - M Huynh-Le
- George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
| | - C Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | - C Jani
- Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, USA
| | | | - D B Johnson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - A Kasi
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| | - H Khan
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
| | - V S Koshkin
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - N M Kuderer
- Advanced Cancer Research Group, LLC, Kirkland, USA
| | - D H Kwon
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - A Li
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | | | - C A Low
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | - G H Lyman
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA
| | - R R McKay
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, USA
| | - C McNair
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - H Menon
- Penn State Health/Penn State Cancer Institute/St. Joseph Cancer Center, Hershey, USA
| | - R A Mesa
- Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson, San Antonio, USA
| | - V Mico
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - D Mundt
- Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, USA
| | - G Nagaraj
- Loma Linda University Cancer Center, Loma Linda, USA
| | - E S Nakasone
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA
| | - J Nakayama
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
| | - A Nizam
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, USA
| | - N L Nock
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, USA; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - C Park
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, USA
| | - J M Patel
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - K G Patel
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, USA
| | - P Peddi
- Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - N A Pennell
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, USA
| | | | - M Puc
- Virtua Health, Marlton, USA
| | | | - M E Reeves
- Loma Linda University Cancer Center, Loma Linda, USA
| | - D Y Reuben
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | | | - R P Rosovsky
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | - M Salazar
- Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson, San Antonio, USA
| | | | - G K Schwartz
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - M R Shah
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | - S A Shah
- Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - C Shah
- University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - J A Shaya
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, USA
| | - S R K Singh
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | - M Smits
- ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center, Appleton, USA
| | | | - D G Stover
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | | | - S Subbiah
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, USA
| | - L Tachiki
- University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA
| | - E Tadesse
- Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, USA
| | - A Thakkar
- Albert Einstein Cancer Center/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | - M D Tucker
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - A K Verma
- Albert Einstein Cancer Center/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA
| | - D C Vinh
- McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - M Weiss
- ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center, Appleton, USA
| | - J T Wu
- Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | | | - Z Xie
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | - P P Yu
- Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, USA
| | - T Zhang
- Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - A Y Zhou
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - H Zhu
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - L Zubiri
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D P Shah
- Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson, San Antonio, USA
| | - J L Warner
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - GdL Lopes
- University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuderer NM, Choueiri TK, Shah DP, Shyr Y, Rubinstein SM, Rivera DR, Shete S, Hsu CY, Desai A, de Lima Lopes G, Grivas P, Painter CA, Peters S, Thompson MA, Bakouny Z, Batist G, Bekaii-Saab T, Bilen MA, Bouganim N, Larroya MB, Castellano D, Del Prete SA, Doroshow DB, Egan PC, Elkrief A, Farmakiotis D, Flora D, Galsky MD, Glover MJ, Griffiths EA, Gulati AP, Gupta S, Hafez N, Halfdanarson TR, Hawley JE, Hsu E, Kasi A, Khaki AR, Lemmon CA, Lewis C, Logan B, Masters T, McKay RR, Mesa RA, Morgans AK, Mulcahy MF, Panagiotou OA, Peddi P, Pennell NA, Reynolds K, Rosen LR, Rosovsky R, Salazar M, Schmidt A, Shah SA, Shaya JA, Steinharter J, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Subbiah S, Vinh DC, Wehbe FH, Weissmann LB, Wu JTY, Wulff-Burchfield E, Xie Z, Yeh A, Yu PP, Zhou AY, Zubiri L, Mishra S, Lyman GH, Rini BI, Warner JL. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395:1907-1918. [PMID: 32473681 PMCID: PMC7255743 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31187-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1193] [Impact Index Per Article: 298.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on patients with COVID-19 who have cancer are lacking. Here we characterise the outcomes of a cohort of patients with cancer and COVID-19 and identify potential prognostic factors for mortality and severe illness. METHODS In this cohort study, we collected de-identified data on patients with active or previous malignancy, aged 18 years and older, with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection from the USA, Canada, and Spain from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) database for whom baseline data were added between March 17 and April 16, 2020. We collected data on baseline clinical conditions, medications, cancer diagnosis and treatment, and COVID-19 disease course. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis of COVID-19. We assessed the association between the outcome and potential prognostic variables using logistic regression analyses, partially adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and obesity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Of 1035 records entered into the CCC19 database during the study period, 928 patients met inclusion criteria for our analysis. Median age was 66 years (IQR 57-76), 279 (30%) were aged 75 years or older, and 468 (50%) patients were male. The most prevalent malignancies were breast (191 [21%]) and prostate (152 [16%]). 366 (39%) patients were on active anticancer treatment, and 396 (43%) had active (measurable) cancer. At analysis (May 7, 2020), 121 (13%) patients had died. In logistic regression analysis, independent factors associated with increased 30-day mortality, after partial adjustment, were: increased age (per 10 years; partially adjusted odds ratio 1·84, 95% CI 1·53-2·21), male sex (1·63, 1·07-2·48), smoking status (former smoker vs never smoked: 1·60, 1·03-2·47), number of comorbidities (two vs none: 4·50, 1·33-15·28), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher (status of 2 vs 0 or 1: 3·89, 2·11-7·18), active cancer (progressing vs remission: 5·20, 2·77-9·77), and receipt of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine (vs treatment with neither: 2·93, 1·79-4·79; confounding by indication cannot be excluded). Compared with residence in the US-Northeast, residence in Canada (0·24, 0·07-0·84) or the US-Midwest (0·50, 0·28-0·90) were associated with decreased 30-day all-cause mortality. Race and ethnicity, obesity status, cancer type, type of anticancer therapy, and recent surgery were not associated with mortality. INTERPRETATION Among patients with cancer and COVID-19, 30-day all-cause mortality was high and associated with general risk factors and risk factors unique to patients with cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to better understand the effect of COVID-19 on outcomes in patients with cancer, including the ability to continue specific cancer treatments. FUNDING American Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health, and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dimpy P Shah
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Yu Shyr
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Samuel M Rubinstein
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Donna R Rivera
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | - Chih-Yuan Hsu
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Gerald Batist
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Deborah B Doroshow
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela C Egan
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Arielle Elkrief
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Navid Hafez
- Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Jessica E Hawley
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Hsu
- University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA; Hartford Health Care, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Ali R Khaki
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Colleen Lewis
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Tyler Masters
- Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kerry Reynolds
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Rachel Rosovsky
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Salazar
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Justin A Shaya
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Suki Subbiah
- Stanley S Scott Cancer Center, LSU Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Donald C Vinh
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Firas H Wehbe
- The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Zhuoer Xie
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Albert Yeh
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Alice Y Zhou
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Leyre Zubiri
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sanjay Mishra
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian I Rini
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jeremy L Warner
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pathan S, Benzar T, Master S, Peddi P. Iatrogenic constipation from barium blockade: A case report. Clin Case Rep 2019; 7:1562-1564. [PMID: 31428392 PMCID: PMC6692969 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Barolith, a mixture of inspissated barium and feces, is a rare complication of barium-contrast studies that lead to intestinal obstruction. With the high morbidity associated with barolith impaction, we recommend that physicians be more aware of complications, increase prompt diagnosis, and initiation of laxatives once discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shajadi Pathan
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center Louisiana State UniversityShreveportLouisiana
| | - Taras Benzar
- Department of Internal MedicineLouisiana State University ShreveportLouisiana
| | - Samip Master
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center Louisiana State UniversityShreveportLouisiana
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center Louisiana State UniversityShreveportLouisiana
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peddi P, Master SR, Dwary AD, Ravipati HP, Patel AH, Pasam A, Katikaneni PK, Shi R, Burton GV, Chu QD. Utility of routine pretreatment evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction in breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. Breast J 2019; 25:62-68. [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Samip R. Master
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Ashish D. Dwary
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Hari P. Ravipati
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Abhishek H. Patel
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Avinash Pasam
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Pavan K. Katikaneni
- Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Runhua Shi
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Gary V. Burton
- Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| | - Quyen D. Chu
- Department of Surgery Division of Surgical Oncology Louisiana State University Health Science Center‐Shreveport Shreveport Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou M, Peddi P, Chu QD. Radiation Therapy for Positive Surgical Margins in Women ≥70 Years with Stage I, Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer. Anticancer Res 2018; 38:5253-5260. [PMID: 30194175 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM A re-excision for positive margin(s) following a lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer is a standard recommendation. However, for elderly women with stage I estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors, who may be at higher surgical risk, whether radiation therapy without re-excision will be adequate is not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated a cohort of 53,950 women aged ≥70 years with Stage I, ER+ breast cancer who had lumpectomy and anti-hormone therapy diagnosed between 2004 and 2011 in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were divided into four groups: 1) negative margins without radiation (XRT), 2) negative margins with XRT, 3) positive margins without XRT, and 4) positive margins with XRT. Clinicopathological and sociodemographic variables were compared among these groups. Univariable and multivariable analysis were employed. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for the groups were as follows: 1) negative margins without radiation (XRT); 77.1%, 2) negative margins with XRT; 90.0%, 3) positive margins without XRT; 62.9%, and 4) positive margins with XRT; 86.8% (p<0.0001). Significant predictors (p<0.01) of OS include treatment groups, age, income status, facility type, facility location, tumor size, tumor grade, and comorbidities. CONCLUSION Radiation therapy for positive surgical margins without re-excision may be a viable option for elderly women with stage I, ER+ tumor treated with lumpectomy and hormonal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meijiao Zhou
- Louisiana Tumor Registry & Biostatistics and LTR & Epidemiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A
| | - Quyen D Chu
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A. .,Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paul A, Shi R, Peddi P, Burton G. Abstract 675: Analysis of post mastectomy radiation outcomes in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes : A review of the National Cancer Database. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The benefit of Post mastectomy radiation (PMRT) has been confirmed in breast cancer patients with ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes (PALN). The role of PMRT in patients with 1-3 PALN is not well defined.
Methods: We identified 102,103 breast cancer patients with mastectomy and 1-3 PALN registered to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004- 2012. Primary outcome was overall survival. Adjusted variables include age, race, comorbidity, insurance, income, education, distance travelled, diagnosing/treating facility, treatment delays, hormone receptor status, regional lymph nodes, stage and treatment modalities. 8 treatment modalities were defined: +/- radiation, +/- adjuvant chemotherapy, +/- adjuvant hormone therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that predict overall survival.
Results: Patients with 1, 2, and 3 PALN comprised 55.7%, 27.6% and 16.6% of the population, respectively. 58.4% of patients received radiation. Younger age (<50years), Asian race, private insurance, annual income >$46,000, lower AJCC tumor stage, hormone receptor positive status and lower number of PALN were independently associated with a lower risk of death in multivariate analysis. Compared to patients who did not receive additional therapy, radiation alone was associated with a non-significant increased risk of death HR 1.10 (95% CI [0.92-1.31]). The addition of hormone and chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death HR 0.36 (95% CI [0.33- 0.3]). Stratified by regional lymph nodes, patients with 1 or 2 PALN had a trend towards increased risk of death with radiation alone compared to patients who did not receive radiation, hormone or chemotherapy. In patients with 3 PALN, there was a trend towards reduced mortality with radiation alone HR 0.89 (95% CI [0.63- 1.23]).
Conclusions: To our knowledge this retrospective study is the largest such review of the outcomes of breast cancer patients with 1-3 PALN receiving adjuvant radiation following mastectomy. Our study found no measurable reduction in risk of death for those patients who received radiation therapy compared to those who did not. We also note that, with an increasing number of PALN, patients receiving PMRT either alone, or with chemotherapy or hormonal therapy, appeared to have a decrease in the risk of death compared to the populations that had not received PMRT. Based on this analysis, the routine addition of radiation following mastectomy is not indicated in patients with 1-3 PALN. The addition of adjuvant hormone and/or chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival advantage.
Citation Format: Anu Paul, Runhua Shi, Prakash Peddi, Gary Burton. Analysis of post mastectomy radiation outcomes in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes : A review of the National Cancer Database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 675.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chu QD, Zhou M, Peddi P, Medeiros KL, Wu XC. Outcomes in real-world practice are different than cooperative trial for elderly patients with early breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation therapy. Surgery 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
10
|
Apte NM, Hanna M, Dherange P, Dawson D, Atkins J, Peddi P, Reddy P, McLarty J, Mansour R. CHARACTERISTICS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN CANCER PATIENTS: A CASE CONTROL STUDY. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(18)30722-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
11
|
Chu QD, Zhou M, Peddi P, Medeiros KL, Zibari GB, Shokouh-Amiri H, Wu XC. Influence of facility type on survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19:1046-1057. [PMID: 28967535 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Revised: 02/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although a volume-outcome relationship has been well established for pancreatectomy, little is known about differences in mortality by facility type. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of facility type on short-term and long-term survival outcomes for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy and identify determinants of overall survival (OS). METHODS A cohort of 33,382 patients with Stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1998 and 2011 were evaluated from the National Cancer Data Base. Clinicopathological, sociodemographic and treatment variables were compared among three facility types where patients received resection: (i) community cancer program (CCP), (ii) comprehensive community cancer program (CCCP), and (iii) academic research program (ARP). 5-year OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Despite ARP having significantly higher percentage of poorly differentiated tumors, higher T-stage tumors, more positive lymph nodes, and greater circle distance compared to the other facilities, it had the highest 5-yr OS. The 5-yr OS for CCP, CCCP, and ARP was 11.2%, 13.2%, and 16.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001) and the median survival time (months) was 12.4, 15.6 and 19.1, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients receiving pancreatic resection at an ARP yielded a higher 5-year OS compared to CCP or CCCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quyen D Chu
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA; The Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Meijiao Zhou
- Louisiana Tumor Registry & Epidemiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA; School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA; The Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
| | - Kaelen L Medeiros
- Louisiana Tumor Registry & Epidemiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA; School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Gazi B Zibari
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA; John C McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Health System, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Hosein Shokouh-Amiri
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA; John C McDonald Regional Transplant Center, Willis Knighton Health System, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana Tumor Registry & Epidemiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA; School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sommerhalder D, Takalkar AM, Shackelford R, Peddi P. Spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome in colon cancer: a case report and literature review. Clin Case Rep 2017; 5:2121-2126. [PMID: 29225869 PMCID: PMC5715407 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Although tumor lysis syndrome is well described, it is rarely seen or suspected in solid malignancies. Early recognition of this entity is paramount in reducing morbidity and mortality. Treating physicians should be aware of this possibility in solid tumor patients with either bulky disease or extensive liver involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sommerhalder
- Department of MedicineLouisiana State University Health Science Center‐ShreveportShreveportLouisiana71130
- Division of Hematology and OncologyLouisiana State University Health Science Center‐ShreveportShreveportLouisiana71130
| | - Amol M. Takalkar
- Department of RadiologyLouisiana State University Health Science Center‐ShreveportShreveportLouisiana71130
| | - Rodney Shackelford
- Department of PathologyLouisiana State University Health Science Center‐ShreveportShreveportLouisiana71130
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of MedicineLouisiana State University Health Science Center‐ShreveportShreveportLouisiana71130
- Division of Hematology and OncologyLouisiana State University Health Science Center‐ShreveportShreveportLouisiana71130
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chu QD, Zhou M, Medeiros KL, Peddi P, Wu XC. Impact of CALGB 9343 Trial and Sociodemographic Variation on Patterns of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Practice for Elderly Women (≥70 Years) with Stage I, Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Anticancer Res 2017; 37:5585-5594. [PMID: 28982874 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 trial demonstrated that adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted in women 70 years or older, with small (≤2 cm), negative lymph nodes, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. We examined whether RT usage following the CALGB publication had decreased over time and evaluated sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with RT omission. MATERIALS AND METHODS From the National Cancer Data Base, we analyzed a cohort of 120,308 women aged 70 years or older with stage I, ER-positive breast cancer who underwent lumpectomy. Patients were classified into two groups based on the time of CALGB 9343 publication: (i) pre-CALGB (up to 2004), and (ii) post-CALGB (2005-2012). Clinicopathological and sociodemographic variables were compared between pre- and post-CALGB groups. Chi-square and multivariable logistic regression were employed, with the omission of adjuvant RT as the primary outcome in the regression analysis. RESULTS Radiation therapy usage decreased by 4.1% after CALGB publication (on average 71.6% pre-CALGB vs. 67.5% post-CALGB; p<0.0001). Almost one-third of women aged ≥85 years received RT in the post-CALGB group. In a multivariable model, the variables significantly associated with increased odds for omission of RT in the post-CALGB group were: advanced age, African-American, increased great circle distance, therapy under academic research program, residents of East South-Central region, living in a rural population <2,500 not adjacent to a metropolitan area, low income level, Medicaid recipients, high comorbidity index, small tumor, well-differentiated histology, residual tumor, and lack of receipt of chemotherapy and anti-hormonal therapy. CONCLUSION During the study period, the CALGB trial publication had a minimal impact on the rate of adjuvant RT use among elderly women with small, ER-positive breast cancers. Significant variation in RT usage existed across sociodemographic strata.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quyen D Chu
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, LA, U.S.A.,Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A
| | - Meijiao Zhou
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A
| | - Kaelen L Medeiros
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A. .,Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, LA, U.S.A
| | - Xiao Cheng Wu
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paul A, Shi R, Peddi P, Burton G. Abstract 2761: Adjuvant chemotherapy outcomes of node negative, T1a,T1b,T1c hormone receptor-negative HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-2761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Patients (pts) with early stage HER2neu-positive breast cancers have a higher risk of recurrence and death compared to hormone receptor positive patients. NCCN guidelines recommends adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II and above HER2-positive breast cancer patients. It is unclear what benefit patients with Stage I HER2-positive breast cancer receive from adjuvant chemotherapy. The current study evaluates the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of early stage ER/PR negative, HER2-positive breast cancer patients registered to the National Cancer Data base (NCDB) from 2010-2012.
Patients and Methods: 3416 women from the NCDB were identified with Stage I ER, PR negative, HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosed between 2010-2012. The primary measured outcome was overall survival. Pts were grouped by tumor size (T1a,T1b,T1c) and adjuvant chemotherapy or no adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, patients were also grouped into lumpectomy with radiation and mastectomy with or without radiation. Adjusted variables included age, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), payer status, income, education, distance travelled, diagnosing/treating facility and treatment delay. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival while adjusting for other factors.
Results: There were a total of 3416 patients, mean age at diagnosis of 57.9 (range 22-90). The mean age was 56.2 years for the chemotherapy group and 61.8 for the no chemotherapy group. Pathological stage distribution was T1a (24.9%), T1b (24.7%) and T1c (50.2%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by 49.5% of T1a, 83.5% of T1b and 95% of T1c pts. Mean patient follow up was 2.7 years (range 0.05-5 years)
In univariate analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) of death for chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy in each T stage was: T1a; 1.22 (0.46-3.28), T1b; 0.221 (0.095-0.512), T1c; 0.217 (0.094-0.498).
In multivariate analysis, adjusting for other factors in the model, HR of death was 0.51 (95%CI: 0.26-1.03) for chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy. The HR of death was 1.92 (95%CI: 1.11-3.32) for pts who received mastectomy without radiation compared to lumpectomy with radiation. In addition, we observed a HR of 5.16 for CCI score of 2 or above as compared to score of 0. There was no difference in outcome based on payer status or race.
Conclusion: Patients with early stage T1 a-c HER2-positive breast cancer had a marginal improvement in overall survival with the addition of chemotherapy. Patients who underwent lumpectomy with radiation were also found to have better overall survival compared to mastectomy without radiation. However, the relatively short follow up and the lack of cancer recurrence information preclude making definitive conclusions relative to adjuvant therapy for pts with these tumors. Longer follow-up and prospective controlled trials will be needed to quantify these potential benefits.
Citation Format: Anu Paul, Runhua Shi, Prakash Peddi, Gary Burton. Adjuvant chemotherapy outcomes of node negative, T1a,T1b,T1c hormone receptor-negative HER2-positive breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2761. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2761
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Fibrosing mediastinitis (FM) is a rare disorder resulting from abnormal immunological-mediated fibro-proliferative reaction in the mediastinum. Here, we describe a case of a 46-year-old female with an incidentally found 11×9 cm posterior mediastinal mass. Multiple biopsies of this unresectable, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose avid mass revealed marked fibrosis without any evidence of malignancy, suggesting idiopathic fibrosing mediastinitis as our initial diagnosis. Multiple interventions including a trial of steroids, fluconazole, and azathioprine to target fibrosing mediastinitis were not successful. Repeat biopsy was consistent with primary mediastinal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma. The manuscript highlights the heightened need for suspecting occult malignancies in cases of FM presenting with an indeterminate cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank Reddy Cingam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Majd Al Shaarani
- Department of Pathology and Translational Pathobiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Amol Takalkar
- Center for Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Lousiana State University Health, Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tano SV, Kavanaugh MM, Peddi P, Mansour RP, Shi R, Burton GV. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Analysis of age and stage distribution and survival between African American and Caucasian women in a predominant low-income population. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e12586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e12586 Background: Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) represent roughly 15% of all breast cancer and are associated with decreased overall survival. A higher incidence of TNBC has been seen in younger and African American patients. We investigated the effect of age and race relative to outcomes of patients with TNBC seen at a state charity hospital system. Methods: This retrospective review identified 194 pts with TNBC diagnosed between 1993-2011 at LSUHSC-Shreveport, a state charity hospital. TNBC was defined as ER/PR both <1% and HER2neu not overexpressed by FISH analysis. The patient’s race, age at diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, treatment, relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival and survival following confirmed metastatic disease were analyzed. Results: There was no statistical difference in frequency of stage between groups. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend to worse RFS in AA and in young pts of both races. Younger age at diagnosis did have an inferior median survival as compared to older pts regardless of race or stage (p=0.0476). There was no difference in median survival following confirmation of metastatic disease between races (p=0.3574) or between age groups (p=0.8548); (median survival = 31 mos, 2.56-204 mos). Conclusions: In a predominantly low income patient population the incidence of TNBC was higher in the AA and in the young (age ≤ 50) as expected. There was no difference in stage or frequency within the populations. However, outcomes appeared to be worse in the younger pts and in AA patients with higher recurrence rate. Survival following first recurrence was similar regardless of age and race. Further analysis of etiologies for racial and age disparities is needed. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Prakash Peddi
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | | | - Runhua Shi
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dwary AD, Gupta A, Burton GV, Peddi P. Primary brain tumor and risk of venous thromboembolism. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e13518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e13518 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently associated with primary brain tumors (PBT). Brain tumors have been associated with higher rates of VTE in multiple studies. Studies comparing VTE incidence in meningioma (MEN), astrocytoma (AA), oligodendroglioma (OG) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are lacking. The aim of this retrospective study is to report the VTE outcomes in all of the above brain tumors. Methods: Retrospective data from 476 patients with PBTs diagnosed between 1995-2015 at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport was analyzed. The incidence of VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) was studied in these patients. Results: Out of 476 patients, 298 were females and 179 were male. One hundred and twenty seven (127) patients had GBM, 52 had AA, 33 had OG and 264 had MEN. Only two patients out of 264 with MEN had VTE (one patient had central line catheter associated DVT). VTE incidence did not correlate with the type of primary treatment i.e surgery verses radiation verses observation in this patient group. The incidence of VTE was 7.8 % in GBM patients. The risk of VTE in AA and OG patients were 7.7% and 9.0 % respectively. The VTE event in the OG, AA and GBM occurred during all phases of treatment including inpatient hospitalization for surgical resection, during concurrent chemo-radiation and in maintenance phase. Biopsy versus partial resection versus complete resection of GBM didn’t correlate with VTE occurrence. Conclusions: VTE is prevalent among adult patients with both low and high grade glial tumors. The thrombotic events occur during all phases of therapy indicating hypercoagulable state for many patients. Life-long anticoagulation may be necessary in these patients with thrombotic events. Thrombotic events in patients with MEN, however, are rare ( < 1%). MEN do not appear to be a hypercoagulable and life-long anticoagulation is probably unnecessary in those with VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Prakash Peddi
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cingam SR, Koshy N, Veillon D, Peddi P. Reversal of isolated 20q deletion with vitamin B 12 replacement in a patient with pernicious anaemia. BMJ Case Rep 2017; 2017:bcr-2016-218689. [PMID: 28275019 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-218689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe vitamin B12 deficiency is well known to cause morphological alterations in bone marrow. In rare instances, these myelodysplastic and megaloblastic changes can coexist with cytogenetic abnormalities. Here, we report a case of a 38-year-old African-American woman with pernicious anaemia, who was found to have an isolated 20q deletion and which resolved after vitamin B12 replacement. We also discuss various mechanisms in which vitamin B12 deficiency can lead to chromosomal abnormalities. A literature review is also performed to evaluate various other chromosomal aberrations associated with B12 deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank Reddy Cingam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center- Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Nebu Koshy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center- Shreveport, LA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Diana Veillon
- Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center- Shreveport, LA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Koshy N, Master S, Leary C, Bozeman A, Peyton-Thomas B, Peddi P, Devarakonda S, Mansour R, Mills G. Eltrombopag Improves Poor Graft Function after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.12.195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
20
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage IA triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has not been defined. In general, patients with T1a and T1b lesions have not been included in adjuvant chemotherapy trials and the inclusion of T1c tumors has been limited. In this study using National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) we investigated the actual use of adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage IA TNBC patients relative to tumor size (T1a, T1b, T1c) and report their survival outcomes.
Patients and Methods: Using NCDB we evaluated a cohort of 13,065 women with TNBC diagnosed between 2010-2012 who had American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IA (node-negative with pathological T1a, T1b or T1c) tumors. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome variable. Based on the tumor size, patients were stratified on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Patients were also stratified according to receipt of adjuvant radiation, radiation with boost, or none. Other adjusted variables included: age, race, Charlson comorbidity index, payer status, income, education, distance traveled, treating facility, and treatment delays. Multivariate Cox regression was employed to analyze the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival.
Results: The mean patient age for the entire cohort was 59.2 years (range 22-90 years), 55.8 years for the chemotherapy group, and 67.8 years for the non-chemotherapy group. There were 1275 T1a, 3197 T1b, and 7729 T1c patients. Tumor size was a very strong predictor of survival. Compared to T1a tumors, HR for death was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.86 –2.37) for T1b tumors and 3.00 (95% CI: 1.86 – 4.83) for T1c tumors. Out of all T1a, T1b, and T1c tumors in this cohort, 48.1 %, 72.6%, and 89.3% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy respectively. A hazard ratio (HR) of death was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.31 – 0.57) for all patients who received chemotherapy compared to non-chemotherapy group. 4-year OS by tumor size and chemotherapy usage is listed in the table indicating an absolute increase of OS with adjuvant chemotherapy employment. HR for death was 0.90 (CI: 0.62 – 1.31) with use of radiation only and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.53 – 0.85) with use of radiation with boost when compared to no radiation therapy.
4-year OS (in percentage) with and without adjuvant chemotherapy use for node-negative T1a, T1b, and T1c TNBCTumor sizeNo ChemotherapyChemotherapyP ValueT1a93.78 %98.36 %0.146T1b91.91 %97.10 %<0.0001T1c80.62 %94.41 %<0.0001
Conclusion: NCDB indicated that the majority of patients with Stage IA TNBC received adjuvant chemotherapy, including 48% of patients with T1a lesions. Our data analysis demonstrated a statistically significant 4-year OS benefit in patients with T1b and T1c tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who did not. The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T1a tumors, however, did not reach statistical significance. Prospective randomized trials could define the potential benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage IA TNBC, particularly for those with T1a and T1b tumors.
Citation Format: Patel AN, Shi R, Peddi P, Burton GV. Triple negative breast cancer - Adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival outcomes in Stage IA disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AN Patel
- Feist Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shrveport, LA
| | - R Shi
- Feist Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shrveport, LA
| | - P Peddi
- Feist Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shrveport, LA
| | - GV Burton
- Feist Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shrveport, LA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Anand K, Cingam S, Peddi P. Recurrent Malignant Melanoma Presenting as Isolated Pleural Metastases in a Patient with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Case Rep Oncol 2017; 10:86-90. [PMID: 28203169 PMCID: PMC5301116 DOI: 10.1159/000455827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Isolated pleural metastasis with pleural effusion is a rare occurrence in malignant melanoma. We report an unusual case of a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and recurrent pleural effusions. The pleural fluid cytology and immunohistochemistry profile were consistent with the diagnosis of CLL. However, chemotherapy with pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab did not result in any meaningful clinical response. A video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and biopsy of the affected nodular parietal layer of the pleura were consistent with malignant melanoma. Our case underlines the importance of having a suspicion for secondary causes of effusion in patients with CLL. We briefly discuss the mechanisms of an increased incidence of secondary cancers in CLL and the diagnosis of isolated pleural metastases in malignant melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kartik Anand
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Methodist Hospital Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shashank Cingam
- Department of Internal Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Feist Weiller Cancer Center/LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Peddi P, Ajit NE, Burton GV, El-Osta H. Regression of a glioblastoma multiforme: spontaneous versus a potential antineoplastic effect of dexamethasone and levetiracetam. BMJ Case Rep 2016; 2016:bcr-2016-217393. [PMID: 28011886 PMCID: PMC5237800 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-217393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with grade IV astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have a median survival of <12 months, increased to 14.6 months by maximal safe resection with radiation and temozolamide. In the absence of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, spontaneous regression of GBM or regression while only being on dexamethasone (DEX) and levetiracetam (LEV) have seldom been reported. Here, we present a case of a patient who had significant regression of the GBM with DEX and LEV alone. In this study, we hypothesise a plausible antineoplastic role of DEX and or LEV in GBM and highlight molecular, preclinical and clinical studies supporting this role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Nisha Elizabeth Ajit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gary Von Burton
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Hazem El-Osta
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Lung cancer is the major cause for cancer-related death in the US. Although advances in chemotherapy and targeted therapy have improved the outcome of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, its prognosis remains dismal. A deeper understanding of the complex interaction between the immune system and tumor microenvironment has identified immune checkpoint inhibitors as new avenue of immunotherapy. Rather than acting directly on the tumor, these therapies work by removing the inhibition exerted by tumor cell or other immune cells on the immune system, promoting antitumoral immune response. To date, two programmed death-1 inhibitors, namely nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have received the US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that failed platinum-based chemotherapy. This manuscript provides a brief overview of the pathophysiology of cancer immune evasion, summarizes pertinent data on completed and ongoing clinical trials involving checkpoint inhibitors, discusses the different strategies to optimize their function, and outlines various challenges that are faced in this promising yet evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazem El-Osta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Kamran Shahid
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Glenn M Mills
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chu QD, Zhou M, Medeiros K, Peddi P. Positive surgical margins contribute to the survival paradox between patients with stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1-2N1, T1N2a) colon cancer. Surgery 2016; 160:1333-1343. [PMID: 27425043 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2016] [Revised: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The underlying reasons for the survival paradox between stage IIB/C and stage IIIA colon cancer are elusive. We hypothesized that positive margins contribute to this paradox. METHODS We evaluated a cohort of 16,471 patients with stage IIIA and stage IIB/C colon cancer from 709,583 cases diagnosed between 2003-2012 in the National Cancer Data Base. All patients had chemotherapy, and all stage IIB/C patients had ≥12 lymph nodes retrieved. Patients with stage IIIA were subdivided further into those with <12 lymph nodes retrieved and those with ≥12 lymph nodes retrieved. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were used. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival rate was 70.8% for stage IIB/C, 81.6% for stage IIIA with <12 lymph nodes, and 85.6% for stage IIIA with ≥12 lymph nodes (P < .0001). The 5-year overall survival rate was 84.3% for stage IIIA with no residual tumor, 74.8% for stage IIIA with residual tumor, 73.3% for stage IIB/C with no residual tumor, and 60.5% for stage IIB/C with residual tumor (P < .0001). Independent predictors (P < .01) of poor overall survival include stage IIB/C, advanced age, African American ethnicity, community cancer program, uninsured and Medicaid, low education level, high comorbidity index, and positive surgical margins. CONCLUSION Positive surgical margins may contribute to the survival paradox between stage IIB/C and stage IIIA colon cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quyen D Chu
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA; Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA.
| | - Meijiao Zhou
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology, New Orleans, LA; School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Kaelen Medeiros
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology, New Orleans, LA; School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA; Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chu QD, Zhou M, Medeiros KL, Peddi P, Kavanaugh M, Wu XC. Poor survival in stage IIB/C (T4N0) compared to stage IIIA (T1-2 N1, T1N2a) colon cancer persists even after adjusting for adequate lymph nodes retrieved and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:460. [PMID: 27412163 PMCID: PMC4944507 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2446-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A survival paradox between Stage IIB/C and Stage IIIA colon cancers exists. It is unclear how adequate lymph nodes dissection (LN) and post-surgery chemotherapy contribute to the survival paradox. We intended to assess the impact of these two factors on the survival paradox. Results We evaluated 34,999 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA or stage IIB/C colon cancer in 2003–2012 from the National Cancer Data Base. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 73.5 % for stage IIIA and 51.1 % for stage IIB/C (P < 0.0001). The 5-year OS was 84.1 % for stage IIIA with post-surgery chemotherapy, 70.8 % for stage IIB/C with ≥ 12 LNs retrieved with chemotherapy, 53.9 % for stage IIB/C < 12 LNs with chemotherapy, 49.5 % for stage IIIA without chemotherapy, 43.7 % for stage IIB/C ≥ 12 LNs retrieved without chemotherapy, to 27.7 % for stage IIB/C < 12 LNs without chemotherapy. Even among stage IIB/C who had optimal treatment (≥12 LNs retrieved, received chemotherapy), OS remains lower than stage IIIA with chemotherapy. After adjusting LN dissection and chemotherapy in addition to the adjustment of other clinical factors, the survival paradox was reduced from HR = 1.76 (95 % CI: 1.68–1.85) to HR 1.51 (95 % CI: 1.44–1.59). Conclusions LN dissection and post-surgery chemotherapy partially explained the survival paradox. More research is warranted to identify other factors that contribute to this paradox. Future iteration of TNM staging system should take this into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quyen D Chu
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130, USA.,Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130, USA
| | - Meijiao Zhou
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology, New Orleans, Louisiana, 71102, USA.,School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, 71102, USA
| | - Kaelen L Medeiros
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology, New Orleans, Louisiana, 71102, USA.,School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, 71102, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130, USA. .,Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130, USA.
| | - Mindie Kavanaugh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130, USA.,Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, 71130, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology, New Orleans, Louisiana, 71102, USA.,School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, 71102, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chu QD, Peddi P. Should Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients with Early Breast Cancer Be Abandoned? Not So Fast. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2016; 10:67-9. [PMID: 27398043 PMCID: PMC4934171 DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s32817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2016] [Revised: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
As major advances are made in the management of early breast cancer, the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) has been called into question. However, before abandoning SLNBx, a critical appraisal of its role should be done because we believe that it remains a critical component of care, especially when tailoring patient's adjuvant therapy. This commentary provides cogent arguments in favor of SLNBx in the management of patients with early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quyen D Chu
- Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.; Professor and Chief of Surgical Oncology Charles D. Knight, Sr. Endowed Professor of Surgery Director, Vice-Chair of Academic Affairs, Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Program, Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU-Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine, The Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.; Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Peddi P, Master SR, Ravipati HP, Patel AH, Dwary AD, Pasam A, Chu Q, Shi R, Burton GV. Pre-treatment evaluation of LVEF for breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines: Is it necessary? J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.6608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Samip R. Master
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | | | | | | | | | - Quyen Chu
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Runhua Shi
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Medeiros K, Peddi P, Zhou M, Chu Q. Can radiation therapy adequately address positive surgical margins in elderly women (≥70 years) with stage I ER+ breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.1045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kaelen Medeiros
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Shreveport, LA
| | | | - Quyen Chu
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gao W, Peddi P, Burton GV, Shi R. Survival outcomes after adjuvant radiation in women ≥ 65 years diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in-situ: Analysis of National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.1058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wenli Gao
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Louisiana State Univ of Health Sci Shreveport, Shreveport, LA
| | | | - Runhua Shi
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ansari J, Naqash AR, Munker R, El-Osta H, Master S, Cotelingam JD, Griffiths E, Greer AH, Yin H, Peddi P, Shackelford RE. Histiocytic sarcoma as a secondary malignancy: pathobiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur J Haematol 2016; 97:9-16. [PMID: 26990812 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare non-Langerhans cell disorder with an aggressive course and limited treatment options. Recent advances in molecular/genetic sequencing have suggested a common clonal origin between various hematolymphoid disorders and cases of secondary HS. Deriving conclusions from previously reported cases of HS arising secondarily to certain hematolymphoid disorders, here we have tried to provide insight into the mechanisms influencing this evolution. We also discuss a clinical case of a 72-year-old man with a diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), presenting subsequently with a heterogeneous liver mass positive with a diagnosis of HS. The liver mass showed a retained BCR-ABL1 translocation suggesting clonality between the CML and HS. As seen in our case and other reported cases of HS derived secondarily, the concurrent expression of immunoglobulin heavy (IGH)-/light-chain rearrangements or cytogenetic markers common to the primary malignancy suggests an evolutionary mechanism involving lineage switching that could potentially be influenced by genetic or epigenetic cues which may occur at the level of a progenitor or the malignant cell itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junaid Ansari
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Abdul Rafeh Naqash
- University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.,Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Reinhold Munker
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Hazem El-Osta
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Samip Master
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | | | | | - Adam H Greer
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Hong Yin
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chu QD, Medeiros KL, Zhou M, Peddi P, Wu XC. RETRACTED: Impact of Cooperative Trial and Sociodemographic Variation on Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Usage in Elderly Women (≥70 Years) with Stage I, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222:667-78. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
32
|
Peddi P, Paryani B, Takalkar A, Bundrick P, Ponugupati J, Nair B, El-Osta H. Exceptional response to cetuximab monotherapy in a patient with metastatic oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a molecular insight. Onco Targets Ther 2016; 9:705-9. [PMID: 26929641 PMCID: PMC4755421 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s99667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) carries a very poor prognosis. A better understanding of the molecular driver of the disease and the identification of biomarkers of response remain paramount for an effective personalized therapy. Case report We report an original case of a 56-year-old patient diagnosed with metastatic HNSCC to both kidneys, who experienced a long-lasting complete response to a single-agent cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody-targeting EGFR. Comprehensive multiplatform biomarker analysis of the tumor revealed the presence of phosphatidyl-inositol 3 kinase mutation, EGFR overexpression, and the absence of PD-1/PD-L1 expression. Since PI3K, a downstream effector of EGFR, is activated, the tumor regression may have occurred mainly through a cetuximab-induced immune-mediated response, rather than EGFR signal blockade. It is plausible that this effect was enhanced by the lack of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression. Conclusion Our case proposes that the absence of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in conjunction with EGFR overexpression may correlate with better response to cetuximab in HNSCC. This hypothesis needs to be examined through a large clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Bhavna Paryani
- Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Amol Takalkar
- Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Paige Bundrick
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - John Ponugupati
- Oncology Department, Herbert J Thomas Memorial Hospital, South Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Binu Nair
- Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Waxahachie, Waxahachie, TX, USA
| | - Hazem El-Osta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pai S, Master S, Dwary A, Patel A, Shi R, Mills G, Peddi P, Koshy N. Outcomes of American Burkitt's Lymphoma in HIV and Non HIV Patients Treated with Rituxan-Hyper CVAD Regimen. a Single Center Retrospective Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.11.632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
34
|
Abstract
Charcot's arthropathy or neuropathic osteoarthropathy is a form of destructive arthropathy associated with decreased sensory innervation. We present an unusual case of a patient referred to oncology clinic for further evaluation of a spindle cell neoplasm of the humerus concerning for malignancy. The mass presented as a lytic lesion associated with a right humerus fracture. This was later diagnosed as Charcot's shoulder secondary to cervical syringomyelia. A detailed case report and discussion are presented here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingdong Su
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Firas Al-Delfi
- Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Glenn Mills
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shi Z, Peddi P, Burton G, Mills G, Shi R. Effect of Postmastectomy Radiation on Survival of AJCC pN2/N3 Breast Cancer Patients. Anticancer Res 2016; 36:261-269. [PMID: 26722052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) in breast cancer patients with N2 and N3 nodal status is often evaluated in combination with other postmastectomy adjuvant treatments. To account for interaction effects and determine the individual impact of PMRT alone, the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was analyzed from 2004-2011. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated a cohort of 38,442 women diagnosed with pathological stage N2/N3 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy between 2004 and 2011 from the NCDB. Overall survival was the outcome variable; primary predictor variable was treatment (PMRT, adjuvant anti-hormonal therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy). Additional variables addressed and adjusted for included: age, race, Charlson Comorbidity index, education, income, payer status, distance traveled, facility type, diagnosing/treating facility, treatment delay, grade of tumor, tumor size, and stage at diagnosis, tumor histology, ER/PR status, and lymph node invasion as well as PMRT boost and dosage. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of PMRT on overall survival while adjusting for secondary predictive factors. RESULTS The majority of patients received one or more postmastectomy procedures such as radiation (69.31%), chemotherapy (88.79%), and/or hormone therapy (62.66%). The median overall survival for all patients was 8.41 years. In multivariate analysis, effects of treatment on survival were significant for chemotherapy alone, hormonal therapy alone, and a combination of PMRT with either chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both. Compared to patients without treatment, patients who received PMRT alone were not significantly associated with an increased risk of death; patients who received hormone therapy alone or chemotherapy alone had a reduced risk of death by 15% and 31%, respectively. With the combination of all three treatments, risk of death was reduced by 64%. CONCLUSION PMRT was not found to be a significant predictor of risk of death for pN2/N3 breast cancer patients when adjusting for socioeconomic factors, disease characteristics, and interaction effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. The benefit of PMRT in addition to chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or both on overall survival seems to be marginal and not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenzhen Shi
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine & Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A
| | - Gary Burton
- Department of Medicine & Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A
| | - Glenn Mills
- Department of Medicine & Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A
| | - Runhua Shi
- Department of Medicine & Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Peddi P, Shi R, Nair B, Ampil F, Mills GM, Jafri SH. Cisplatin, cetuximab, and radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer: a retrospective review. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2015; 9:1-7. [PMID: 25628515 PMCID: PMC4283547 DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s18682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2014] [Revised: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Efficacy of cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) was evaluated. A total of 96 patients with newly diagnosed LAHNC treated at our institution between 2006 and 2011 with concurrent radiation and cisplatin (group A, n = 45), cetuximab (group B, n = 24), or started with cisplatin but switched to cetuximab because of toxicity (group C, n = 27) were reviewed. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test were used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for median age, T stage, albumin levels, hemoglobin levels, performance status, and comorbidities. A complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17%, and 67% of patients (P < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between groups A and C. The median OS for groups A and C was not reached (>65 months), even though it was significantly longer than median OS for group B (11.6 months; P ≤ 0.001). The 2-year OS in groups A and C is significantly higher than that in group B (70% for groups A and C, 22% for group B). There is no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between groups A and C. The median PFS for these groups was not reached (>62 months), and is significantly longer than that for group B (4.3 months; P ≤ 0.001). The 2-year PFS of group A (67%) and group C (76%) was significantly longer than that of group B (20%). Cisplatin with radiation appears to be more efficacious even in suboptimal dosing than cetuximab with radiation in LAHNC but the two groups were not well matched.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, LA, USA. ; Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Runhua Shi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, LA, USA. ; Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Binu Nair
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, LA, USA. ; Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Fred Ampil
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, LA, USA. ; Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Glenn M Mills
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Louisiana State University Health, Shreveport, LA, USA. ; Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Syed H Jafri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kodali MD, Takalkar A, Shi R, Peddi P, Mills GM, Jafri SHR. SUV max of the most intense lesion on fdgpet/CT scan at baseline as a potential prognostic factor in stage IV (NSCLC): A retrospective review. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e19070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e19070 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality in United States and worldwide. Stage IV lung cancer has poor prognosis with 5-year survival of 2%. Limited numbers of factors are known to predict survival in stage IV NSCLC (Non Small Cell Lung Cancer) including stage at diagnosis, Performance Status (PS), genomic expression profile. Earlier studies have found SUV max (Maximum Standardized Uptake Value) of primary lung tumor on FDGPET/CT (Fluoro Deoxy Glucose –Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography) correlates with tumor doubling time and survival. However prior studies included stage I-IV NSCLC patients and SUVmax of primary lung tumor. Hence we performed this study with only clinical stage IVNSCLC who underwent FDGPET/CT scan at baseline to determine whether SUVmax value of most intense lesion has any prognostic significance. Methods: Retrospective review identified 46 patients (September 2004- September 2011) that were diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC at our institution. SUVmax of most intense lesion on FDG PET/CT scan was determined utilizing an automated program on a dedicated PET/CT workstation by a single nuclear medicine specialist. Cox regression analysis and Log-rank test were used to analyze data. Results: Descriptive statistics: Median age 61.6 (43.8-77.8), Females 17 (36%), African Americans 26 (56%), Performance status 0-1=36 (80%), number of metastatic sites 1-2=30 (65%), Adenocarcinoma 32 (70%), Chemotherapy 31 (61%), SUV max- primary (65%), other sites (35%). The patient population was subdivided into two groups using the median SUVmax of 17.8. The median survival of patients having SUV max ≤17.8 and SUVmax > 17.8 was 13.4 months and 4.5 months respectively (P =0.0269). Multivariate analysis indicated PS (HR=2.8), any chemotherapy (HR=2.56) and SUV max ≤ 17.8 (HR=1.98, P=0.04) predicted survival. Conclusions: SUV max of the most intense lesion at the time of presentation predicts worse outcome in stage IVNSCLC and needs to be validated in a prospective study. PETCT may be able to predict the areas that harbor resistant clones of cells, described in previous studies as tumor heterogeneity, which may confer prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Runhua Shi
- LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Lousiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Volodin L, Peddi P, Takalkar A, Comeau JM, Shahan JL, Hildebrandt GC. Successful treatment of first and second recurrence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia after related allogeneic bone marrow transplant at unusual sites using single-dose vincristine followed by interferon-α2b and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Leuk Lymphoma 2012; 54:1107-9. [PMID: 23020692 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2012.734617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
39
|
Peddi P, Shi R, Panu L, Ampil F, Nathan CA, Armaghany T, Mills GM, Jafri SHR. Cisplatin (CDDP) and radiation versus cetuximab (Cx) and radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (SCHNC): A retrospective review. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e16009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e16009 Background: SCHNC is a common malignancy and approximately 60% of patients present with locally advanced disease. There is paucity of data directly comparing Cx and CDDP with concurrent radiation in locally advanced SCHNC. We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients treated with CDDP and/or Cx along with radiation in locally advanced SCHNC comparing efficacy and outcomes in an academic cancer center. Methods: Ninety-five patients with locally advanced SCHNC were treated with concurrent CDDP (100 mg/m2 day 1, 22, 43) or Cx (400mg/m2 on day -7 and 250mg/m2 weekly) at our institution between January 2006 and June 2011. Forty-four patients were treated with CDDP (group A), 24 with Cx (group B) and 27 were initially started on CDDP but were switched to Cx secondary to toxicity (group C). All patients received concurrent radiation treatments (66-70 Gy, 2.0 Gy/fraction). The selection of CDDP versus Cx was largely based on ECOG performance status (PS) and baseline renal function of the patients. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test was used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics except for mean age of 61, 56 and 55 years in group A, B and C respectively; T4 tumors consisted of 44%, 75% and 41% in groups A, B and C respectively. Groups A, B and C had a combined ECOG 0 and I (PS) of 93%, 75% and 92%. Patients with ECOG III PS were excluded. Results: Oropharynx was the most common treated site (38%) followed by Larynx (35%). Complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17% and 67% in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 16.6, 4.3 and 22.8 in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.001) and median overall survival (OS) was >35, 11.6 and >32 months in groups A, B and C respectively (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Concurrent CDDP with radiation leads to better response rate PFS and OS as opposed to Cx though many patients treated with CDDP could not complete treatment due to toxicity. Randomized trial comparing the two should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Lousiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Runhua Shi
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | - Lori Panu
- Lousiana State University Health Science, Shreveport, LA
| | - Fred Ampil
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA
| | | | - Tannaz Armaghany
- Louisiana State University Health-Feist Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tamkus D, Wiese D, Sikorskii A, Chivu S, Peddi P, Chitneni S. P5-01-19: Endothelin-1 Expression in Breast Cancer Tissue, Surrounding Stroma, Correlation with Tumor Microvessel Density and Clinical Outcome. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p5-01-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a peptide which regulates normal biological processes such as vascular tone. In addition, endothelin signaling pathway is dysregulated in pathophysiological conditions such as cancer and fibrosis. It has been shown that endothelin-1 is expressed in breast cancer tissue but little is known with regard to ET-1 expression in surrounding tumor stroma. In the present study, we investigated ET-1 expression in breast tumor cells, surrounding stroma, association with tumor microvessel density (MVD) and impact on clinical outcome.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study. Patients from 3 medical centers with histologically documented stage I-III invasive breast cancer were included in the study. Paraffin embedded formalin fixed breast cancer tissue and surrounding stroma were evaluated for ET-1 and CD34 (marker for MVD) by IHC. ET-1 cytoplasmic expression was scored as positive (3+ by IHC) or negative (0, 1+, 2+). Stained vessels by CD34 were counted in five consecutive fields at 40 x magnification and their mean was recorded. Demographics, clinical data and recurrence free interval (RFI) in months were available for statistical analysis.
Results: The study included 92 patients with average age of 55 years at diagnosis. Median follow up of patients at the time of analysis was 72 months. Total of 29 patients experienced disease progression ( 17 locoregional and 12 distant). Tumor ET-1 expression positively correlated with earlier stage: odds ratio (OR) = 22 for stage I and OR=20 for stage II as compared with stage III. Positive ET-1 staining in tumor was detected in 72.8 % of cases, while ET-1 positive expression in stroma was detected only in 6.5% of cases. Interestingly, all ET-1 stroma positive tumors were estrogen receptor (ER) positive. The means of CD34 were not different according to ET-1 expression either in the tumor or stroma. Triple negative breast cancer tumors exhibited higher MVD (p=0.0177). In the logistic regression model relating ET-1 expression in tumor to clinical variables, ET-1 positive tumors showed a trend for the association with higher relapse rate (p=0.058). Multivariate analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in the recurrence free interval (RFI) between the ET-1 positive and ET-1 negative groups (long-rank test p-value = 0.71). Survival analysis identified stage as a significant predictor of RFI in the Cox proportional hazard model that included ET-1 expression and other clinical variables.
Conclusions: The significant predictor for ET-1 expression in the tumor was early stage. High tumor ET-1 expression was more common in patients who experienced breast cancer recurrence. No association was found between ET-1 expression and MVD, and between ET-1 expression and time to recurrence. Further studies with larger sample size are needed to better delineate a role of ET-1 as prognostic biomarker in early stage breast cancer.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Tamkus
- 1Michigan State University (MSU); McLaren Regional Medical Center (MRMC)
| | - D Wiese
- 1Michigan State University (MSU); McLaren Regional Medical Center (MRMC)
| | - A Sikorskii
- 1Michigan State University (MSU); McLaren Regional Medical Center (MRMC)
| | - S Chivu
- 1Michigan State University (MSU); McLaren Regional Medical Center (MRMC)
| | - P Peddi
- 1Michigan State University (MSU); McLaren Regional Medical Center (MRMC)
| | - S Chitneni
- 1Michigan State University (MSU); McLaren Regional Medical Center (MRMC)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Peddi P, Chitneni S, Noel M, Schwartz KA. Weight loss: An important but often overlooked clue for the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e19661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
42
|
Peddi P, Loftin CW, Dickey JS, Hair JM, Burns KJ, Aziz K, Francisco DC, Panayiotidis MI, Sedelnikova OA, Bonner WM, Winters TA, Georgakilas AG. DNA-PKcs deficiency leads to persistence of oxidatively induced clustered DNA lesions in human tumor cells. Free Radic Biol Med 2010; 48:1435-43. [PMID: 20193758 PMCID: PMC2901171 DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2009] [Revised: 01/22/2010] [Accepted: 02/23/2010] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a key non-homologous-end-joining (NHEJ) nuclear serine/threonine protein kinase involved in various DNA metabolic and damage signaling pathways contributing to the maintenance of genomic stability and prevention of cancer. To examine the role of DNA-PK in processing of non-DSB clustered DNA damage, we have used three models of DNA-PK deficiency, i.e., chemical inactivation of its kinase activity by the novel inhibitors IC86621 and NU7026, knockdown and complete absence of the protein in human breast cancer (MCF-7) and glioblastoma cell lines (MO59-J/K). A compromised DNA-PK repair pathway led to the accumulation of clustered DNA lesions induced by gamma-rays. Tumor cells lacking protein expression or with inhibited kinase activity showed a marked decrease in their ability to process oxidatively induced non-DSB clustered DNA lesions measured using a modified version of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis or single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). In all cases, DNA-PK inactivation led to a higher level of lesion persistence even after 24-72h of repair. We suggest a model in which DNA-PK deficiency affects the processing of these clusters first by compromising base excision repair and second by the presence of catalytically inactive DNA-PK inhibiting the efficient processing of these lesions owing to the failure of DNA-PK to disassociate from the DNA ends. The information rendered will be important for understanding not only cancer etiology in the presence of an NHEJ deficiency but also cancer treatments based on the induction of oxidative stress and inhibition of cluster repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Charles W. Loftin
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Jennifer S. Dickey
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20895, USA
| | - Jessica M. Hair
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Kara J. Burns
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Khaled Aziz
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Dave C. Francisco
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Mihalis I. Panayiotidis
- Department of Pathology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Olga A. Sedelnikova
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20895, USA
| | - William M. Bonner
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20895, USA
| | - Thomas A. Winters
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Alexandros G. Georgakilas
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
- Corresponding author: Alexandros G. Georgakilas, Address: Biology Department, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, Howell Science Complex N418, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858. Tel: 252-328-5446, Fax: 252-328-4178,
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Peddi P, Slay LE, Lilien DL, Fowler MR, Cotelingam J, Veillon DM, Ayirookuzhi S, Koshy N, Mills GM, Munker R. Metastatic malignant melanoma in a patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma in remission. J La State Med Soc 2010; 162:47-50. [PMID: 20336959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Peddi P, Francisco DC, Cecil AM, Hair JM, Panayiotidis MI, Georgakilas AG. Processing of clustered DNA damage in human breast cancer cells MCF-7 with partial DNA-PKcs deficiency. Cancer Lett 2008; 269:174-83. [PMID: 18550272 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2008] [Revised: 04/22/2008] [Accepted: 04/22/2008] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Complex DNA damage such as double strand breaks (DSBs) and non-DSB bistranded oxidative clustered DNA lesions (OCDL) (two or more DNA lesions within a short DNA fragment of 1-10bp on opposing DNA strands) are considered the hallmark of ionizing radiation. Clustered DNA lesions are hypothesized to be repair-resistant lesions challenging the repair mechanisms of the cell. The DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) plays an important role during the processing of DSBs. To evaluate the role of DNA-PKcs in the processing of complex DNA damage in human MCF-7 breast cancer cells we used small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to target the silencing of the gene Prkdc coding for DNA-PKcs. MCF-7 cells with knockdown DNA-PKcs expression showed a marked decrease in their efficiency to process DSBs and OCDL after exposure to radiotherapy-relevant gamma ray doses. For the detection and measurement of complex DSBs and OCDL, we used the gamma-H2AX assay and an adaptation of pulsed field gel electrophoresis with Escherichia coli repair enzymes as DNA damage probes. An accumulation of all types of DNA damage was detected for the siRNA-treated MCF-7 cells compared to controls. These findings point to the important role of DNA-PKcs in the processing of complex DNA damage and its potential association with breast cancer development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Peddi
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Howell Science Complex, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Francisco DC, Peddi P, Hair JM, Flood BA, Cecil AM, Kalogerinis PT, Sigounas G, Georgakilas AG. Induction and processing of complex DNA damage in human breast cancer cells MCF-7 and nonmalignant MCF-10A cells. Free Radic Biol Med 2008; 44:558-69. [PMID: 18005669 DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.10.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2007] [Revised: 10/12/2007] [Accepted: 10/13/2007] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Oxidatively induced stress and DNA damage have been associated with various human pathophysiological conditions, including cancer and aging. Complex DNA damage such as double-strand breaks (DSBs) and non-DSB bistranded oxidatively induced clustered DNA lesions (OCDL) (two or more DNA lesions within a short DNA fragment of 1-10 bp on opposing DNA strands) are hypothesized to be repair-resistant lesions challenging the repair mechanisms of the cell. To evaluate the induction and processing of complex DNA damage in breast cancer cells exposed to radiotherapy-relevant gamma-ray doses, we measured single-strand breaks (SSBs), DSBs, and OCDL in MCF-7 and HCC1937 malignant cells as well as MCF-10A nonmalignant human breast cells. For the detection and measurement of SSBs, DSBs, and OCDL, we used the alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis, gamma-H2AX assay, and an adaptation of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with E. coli repair enzymes as DNA damage probes. Increased levels for most types of DNA damage were detected in MCF-7 cells while the processing of DSBs and OCDL was deficient in these cells compared to MCF-10A cells. Furthermore, the total antioxidant capacity of MCF-7 cells was lower compared to their nonmalignant counterparts. These findings point to the important role of complex DNA damage in breast cancer and its potential association with breast cancer development especially in the case of deficient BRCA1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dave C Francisco
- Department of Biology, Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lally BE, Geiger GA, Kridel S, Arcury-Quandt AE, Robbins ME, Kock ND, Wheeler K, Peddi P, Georgakilas A, Kao GD, Koumenis C. Identification and biological evaluation of a novel and potent small molecule radiation sensitizer via an unbiased screen of a chemical library. Cancer Res 2007; 67:8791-9. [PMID: 17875720 PMCID: PMC3610568 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
For patients with solid tumors, the tolerance of surrounding tissues often limits the dose of radiation that can be delivered. Thus, agents that preferentially increase the cytotoxic effects of radiation toward tumor cells would significantly alter the therapeutic ratio and improve patient survival. Using a high-throughput, unbiased screening approach, we have identified 4'-bromo-3'-nitropropiophenone (NS-123) as a radiosensitizer of human glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. NS-123 radiosensitized U251 glioma cells in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner, with dose enhancement ratios ranging from 1.3 to 2.0. HT-29 colorectal carcinoma and A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells were also radiosensitized by NS-123 in vitro, whereas NS-123 did not increase the radiation sensitivity of normal human astrocytes or developmental abnormalities or lethality of irradiated Zebrafish embryos. In a novel xenograft model of U251 cells implanted into Zebrafish embryos, NS-123 enhanced the tumor growth-inhibitory effects of ionizing radiation (IR) with no apparent effect on embryo development. Similar results were obtained using a mouse tumor xenograft model in which NS-123 sensitized U251 tumors to IR while exhibiting no overt toxicity. In vitro pretreatment with NS-123 resulted in accumulation of unrepaired IR-induced DNA strand breaks and prolonged phosphorylation of the surrogate markers of DNA damage H2AX, ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein, DNA-dependent protein kinase, and CHK2 after IR, suggesting that NS-123 inhibits a critical step in the DNA repair pathway. These results show the potential of this cell-based, high-throughput screening method to identify novel radiosensitizers and suggest that NS-123 and similar nitrophenol compounds may be effective in antiglioma modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian E. Lally
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Geoffrey A. Geiger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven Kridel
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Alice E. Arcury-Quandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Michael E. Robbins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Nancy D. Kock
- Department of Pathology/Comparative Medicine, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kenneth Wheeler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Prakash Peddi
- Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | | | - Gary D. Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|