Impact of the cost of prescription drugs on clinical outcomes in indigent patients with heart disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To measure the impact that economic relief for prescription drugs to indigent patients with cardiovascular disease has on indicators of disease control.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University inner-city outpatient clinic.

PATIENTS

One hundred sixty-three indigent patients with heart disease who were uninsured or whose insurance plan did not provide prescription drug coverage and who had baseline data.

INTERVENTION

Patients were assisted in obtaining prescription drugs, free of charge, in an attempt to improve adherence to their drug regimens.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point was to determine if cardiovascular outcome measures (i.e., international normalized ratio [INR], blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, and hospitalizations) and drug adherence improved in all patients after 6 months of prescription assistance compared with a 6-month baseline period. In patients receiving warfarin, mean INR increased from 2.44 +/- 0.64 at baseline to 2.61 +/- 0.53 at 6 months (p<0.05). In patients with hypertension, mean blood pressure decreased from 138 +/- 20/80 +/- 11 mm Hg at baseline to 138 +/- 19/78 +/- 12 mm Hg at 6 months (p<0.05 for diastolic blood pressure only). The mean LDL level for patients on lipid-lowering drugs significantly decreased from 126 +/- 39 mg/dl at baseline to 108 +/- 38 mg/dl at 6 months (p<0.001). For each disease measure, the improved disease control seen at 6 months persisted throughout 24 months of follow-up. Hospitalizations for the entire cohort decreased from 85 at baseline to 49 at 6 months. Patient drug adherence improved from 48.5% at baseline to 72.7% at 6 months (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug adherence and clinical outcomes improved, and the number of hospitalizations declined when cardiovascular drugs were obtained for patients who could not afford to pay for them. Health care insurance plans that do not provide coverage for cardiovascular prescription drugs may be more costly secondary to poor disease control and increased hospitalizations.

Analysis of the use of digoxin immune fab for the treatment of non-life-threatening digoxin toxicity

BACKGROUND

Studies indicate that digoxin toxicity often results in lengthy hospitalizations and considerable costs, both of which may be decreased through the routine use of digoxin immune Fab (FAB).

METHODS

A computer-based decision analysis model was developed to compare the treatment of non-life-threatening digoxin toxicity with either FAB or standard therapy from the hospital perspective. A cost-minimization analysis was then performed to compare overall total costs (primary endpoint) for each treatment branch. A secondary endpoint of length of hospital stay (LOS) was also compared between the 2 groups. Clinical variables (serum digoxin concentration [SDC], creatinine clearance [Clcr], and body weight), event probabilities, and other model-specific variables were varied in univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

FAB was associated with an incremental cost of $54 compared with standard therapy ($2,784 vs. $2,730, respectively) but reduced LOS by 1.5 days (1.5 days vs. 3.0 days, respectively). Sensitivity analyses show that FAB is less costly at SDC > 3.5 ng/mL and Clcr < 22 mL/min. FAB reduced LOS at SDC > 2.3 ng/mL. Monte Carlo simulation revealed that FAB was less costly in 37% of the cases and reduced LOS 72% of the time compared with standard therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The abbreviated LOS associated with the use of FAB in patients with non-life-threatening digoxin toxicity may translate into lower treatment costs in many clinical scenarios, making it a cost-saving alternative to standard therapy in patients with high SDC and renal dysfunction.

New antithrombotics for the intensive care unit setting: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors

Thromboembolic disease (TED) is a frequent problem encountered by clinicians in the intensive care unit (ICU). Traditionally, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been used in the treatment and prophylaxis of TED. However, newer antithrombotic agents have evolved as effective alternatives to UFH. Low-molecular-weight heparins are effective for both the treatment and prophylaxis of TED. Lepirudin is useful for patients with TED and a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are synergistic with UFH for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Several drugs are now available to clinicians for the treatment and prophylaxis of TED.