Abstract P1-10-06: A randomized phase II trial evaluating the endocrine activity and efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix versus triptorelin in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole for primary endocrine responsive breast cancer (TREND; IBCSG 41-13)

Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and aromatase inhibitors is effective in selected premenopausal patients (pts). Degarelix, an antagonist of GnRH, has immediate onset of action through binding to GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland and thereby suppressing the production of LH and FSH. Its suppressing activity in premenopausal women might be faster and free of estrodial breakthrough on continued treatment compared with a GnRH angonist, and thereby provide significant clinical value for pts who are candidates for short-term NET.

Methods: Eligible pts were premenopausal women with cT2-4b, any nodal stage, ER and PgR >50%, HER2-negative (by IHC and/or ISH) breast cancer who were not candidates for breast conserving surgery. Premenopausal status was determined locally with estradiol (E2) levels >54 pg/mL (or >198 pmol/L), measured within 14 days prior to randomization. Pts were randomized 1:1 to Triptorelin (T) 3.75 mg i.m. on day 1 of every cycle or Degarelix (D) 240 mg s.c. given as two injections of 120 mg on day 1 of cycle 1, then 80 mg s.c. on day 1 of cycles 2-6 with letrozole (L) 2.5 mg/day for 6 cycles. Each cycle was 28 days. Definitive surgery was performed within 2-3 weeks after the last administration of T or D. Serum was collected prior to the first injection (baseline), 24 and 72 hours, 7 and 14 days, then prior to injection on day 1 of cycles 2-6. The primary endpoint was time to optimal ovarian function suppression (OFS) calculated as time from the first injection of D or T to the first assessment of centrally assessed 17-β-estradiol (E2) level in the range of optimal OFS (≤2.72 pg/mL or ≤10 pmol/L) during the 6 cycles of NET. The trial had 90% power to detect a difference using a logrank test, 2-sided α=0.05. Secondary endpoints included tolerability, Ki67changes, PEPI score, best overall response. NCT02005887

Results: TREND completed accrual of 51 pts in January 2017. A preliminary analysis based on the first 45 pts is reported here. 89% of patients were ≥40 yrs, 76% had T1-2 and 22% T3 tumors, and 51% were node-positive. Dominant histology type was ductal (93%). The table summarizes centrally-assessed E2 according to treatment at baseline and for the first 5 assessment time points indicating immediate suppression for the D+L arm. E2 levels on day 1 of cycles 2-6 were all below the limit of quantification (0.625 pg/mL) for the D+L arm. For the T+L arm continued OFS was not maintained in 4 pts.

 BaselineCycle 1Cycle 2Day:01371429No. Pts      D+L222221212221T+L232321232222Median (IQR)     D+L96.2 (64.2,206.8)10.1 (4.0,21.8)0.6 (0.6,1.0)0.6 (0.6,0.6)0.6 (0.6,0.6)0.6 (0.6, 0.6)T+L85.1 (49.7,118.0)37.4 (17.9,59.2)12.8 (7.7,23.8)9.0 (1.2,29.7)0.6 (0.6,1.4)0.6 (0.6, 0.6)

Conclusion: Evidence from this first analysis demonstrates rapid and maintained OFS with the combination of D+L as a NET in premenopausal breast cancer patients. The final analysis of the total population, including secondary endpoints, will be presented at the symposium.

Citation Format: Colleoni M, Gray K, Munzone E, Dellapasqua S, Zamagni C, Gianni L, Johansson H, Viale G, Kammler R, Maibach R, Rabaglio-Poretti M, Di Leo A, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Regan MM, Goldhirsch A. A randomized phase II trial evaluating the endocrine activity and efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix versus triptorelin in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole for primary endocrine responsive breast cancer (TREND; IBCSG 41-13) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-06.

Abstract P5-18-01: Extended continuous vs intermittent adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women with lymph node-positive, early breast cancer (IBCSG 37-05/BIG 1-07 SOLE): Impact on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life

Background: SOLE efficacy results presented at ASCO 2017 showed that extended intermittent vs continuous letrozole for 5 years did not improve disease-free survival in postmenopausal women who had received 4-6 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone-receptor positive (HR+), lymph-node positive breast cancer. Previous studies showed that the burden by symptoms related to endocrine therapy can be substantial. Even if symptoms improve during the treatment course, extending treatment implies continuation of symptoms. We compared differences in patient-reported symptoms (PRS) and quality of life (QoL) between extended continuous and intermittent letrozole over the first two years of trial treatment.

Methods: From Nov 2007 to Dec 2010, 956 postmenopausal women who were disease-free following 4-6 years of prior adjuvant endocrine therapy for HR+, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled in the QoL substudy of the randomized phase III trial SOLE at selected centers. Patients receive extended continuous letrozole (2.5 mg daily) for 5 years or intermittent letrozole, taken for the first 9 months of years 1-4, and 12 months in year 5. 955 patients completed the 18-item Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) Symptom Scales and further symptom-specific and global QoL indicators at baseline, and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after randomization. Differences in change of PRS and QoL from baseline between the two administration schedules were tested at 12 and 24 months for 8 symptom scales, 4 additional symptom and 4 global QoL indicators using mixed models with repeated measures.

Results: Small changes in PRS and QoL scores were observed between baseline and 12 months after randomization, i.e. at the end of the first treatment-free interval in the intermittent arm. These changes showed a consistent pattern of greater worsening for patients receiving continuous compared to patients receiving intermittent letrozole. Patients receiving continuous letrozole reported a significantly greater worsening in vaginal problems (p<.02), musculoskeletal pain (p<.03), sleep disturbance (p<.01), physical wellbeing (p<.01) and mood (p<.03). At 24 months (after 2nd treatment-free interval) patients with intermittent letrozole reported a greater improvement in hot flushes (p<.03) than those with continuous letrozole. Changes in the other outcomes did not significantly differ between arms at 24 months.

Conclusion: Although changes in PRS and QoL were small, there was a consistent pattern favoring the intermittent arm. For several symptoms and global QoL indicators, significantly less worsening was observed with the intermittent administration, mainly during the first year of extended treatment, due to small improvements during the treatment-free interval. Froma QoL perspective, women who suffer from endocrine side-effects in the extended setting may benefit from an intermittent administration.

Citation Format: Ribi K, Luo W, Colleoni M, Karlsson P, Chirgwin J, Aebi S, Jerusalem G, Neven P, Di Lauro V, Gomez HL, Ruhstaller T, Abdi E, Di Leo A, Müller B, Maibach R, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Coates AS, Regan MM, Bernhard J. Extended continuous vs intermittent adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women with lymph node-positive, early breast cancer (IBCSG 37-05/BIG 1-07 SOLE): Impact on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-01.

Abstract P5-18-02: Nab-Paclitaxel-based therapy in the first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (IBCSG 42-12/BIG 2-12 SNAP): Impact of different schedules on quality of life

Background: The randomized phase II SNAP trial assessed three alternative reduced maintenance chemotherapy regimens using nab-Paclitaxel after a short term induction phase at conventional doses as first line treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). For all three regimens median progression-free survival was greater than achieved with full dose docetaxel (historical reference). Symptom palliation and quality of life (QoL) are important when deciding on therapeutic agents and schedules in MBC pts.

Methods: Of the 258 pts with MBC enrolled from April 2013 to August 2015 in the SNAP trial, 255 were included in the QoL analysis. Pts were randomized to three arms, each receiving the same induction chemotherapy based on 3 cycles of nab-Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 dd 1, 8, 15 Q28, which was reduced to 125 mg/m2 after a safety review. The schedules of nab-Paclitaxel in maintenance therapy differed in each arm: Arm A) 150 mg/m2 dd 1,15 Q28; Arm B) 100 mg/m2 dd 1,8,15 Q28; Arm C) 75 mg/m2 dd 1,8,15,22 Q28. Pts completed a QoL form to assess global and symptom-specific indicators (range 0-100) at baseline, and at day 1 of every cycle for the first 12 cycles on treatment, or until treatment discontinuation. Changes in QoL scores during induction (day 1 cycle 4 − baseline) and maintenance (day 1 cycle 12 – day 1 cycle 4) therapy were summarized descriptively per arm. Treatment effects on changes in QoL during maintenance therapy were analyzed by repeated measurement models including timepoints (from day 1 of cycle 4 to day 1 of cycle 12), induction start dose, age, and treatment arms as covariates.

Results: During induction therapy, mean changes [SD] in hair loss (Arm A:−70.2 [41.9]; Arm B: −77.3 [34.5]; Arm C: −72.6 [32.8]), sensory neuropathy (Arm A: −19.0 [25.2]; Arm B: −20.6 [22.7]; Arm C: −18.8 [23.8]), and treatment burden (Arm A: −12.9 [33.4]; Arm B: −13.4 [33.5]; Arm C: −11.4 [34.8]) showed the most pronounced worsening. During maintenance therapy, scores for sensory neuropathy remained impaired without worsening. No significant differences in changes for sensory neuropathy or the other symptoms were seen between arms, except for hair loss, with pts in arm C (mean difference 10.91; 95% CI [0.35, 21.48]; p=0.04) ] and B (mean difference 18.55; 95% CI [7.52, 29.59]; p=0.001) reporting a greater improvement compared to those in arm A. Pts in arm C reported a significantly greater improvement in mood compared to arm A (mean difference 13.34; 95% CI [6.08, 20.60]; p<0.001) and arm B (mean difference 9.62; 95% CI [2.84, 16.40]; p=0.01)].

Conclusion: The effectiveness of alternative maintenance chemotherapy schedules with reduced doses after a short term induction phase at conventional doses must be weighed against a substantial worsening in sensory neuropathy during induction therapy, and scores continuing to be impaired without worsening with prolonged administration. During maintenance therapy, improvements were seen in the perception of hair loss and in mood, particularly in Arm B and C, with a similar tendency seen for some other QoL domains. A more frequent administration of reduced dose chemotherapy agents is favorable with respect to QoL in this setting.

Citation Format: Ribi K, Sun Z, Jerusalem G, Hasler-Strub U, Colleoni M, von Moos R, Cortés J, Vidal M, Hennessy B, Walshe J, Amillano Parraga K, Morales Muriilo S, Pagani O, Barbeaux A, Bortsnar S, Maibach R, Regan MM, Gennari A, Bernhard J. Nab-Paclitaxel-based therapy in the first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (IBCSG 42-12/BIG 2-12 SNAP): Impact of different schedules on quality of life [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-02.

Abstract P6-11-16: PYTHIA: A phase II study of palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant for pretreated patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer

This abstract was not presented at the symposium.

Abstract P5-15-05: Randomized phase II study evaluating different schedules of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Results of the SNAP study

Background

Longer chemotherapy (CT) duration is associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and a moderate, but significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in MBC patients (pts). Prolonged CT administration, however, must be weighed against the side effects of continuous CT delivery. The SNAP trial was designed to improve the tolerability of prolonged CT by studying alternative treatment schedules.

Methods

The SNAP trial enrolled 258 women from April 2013 to Aug 2015. Eligibility criteria included HER2- MBC, no prior CT for advanced disease, measurable and/or non-measurable disease.

All eligible pts were randomized to one of three arms. Pts received the same induction chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles of nab-Paclitaxel given days 1,8,15 Q28, followed by one of the three maintenance therapy schedules. Originally, the dose of the induction chemotherapy was 150 mg/m2, but this was reduced to 125 mg/m2 following the first safety review of 48 treated pts. The three schedules of nab-Paclitaxel used as maintenance therapy were (Arm A) nab-Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 d 1,15 Q28; (Arm B) nab-Paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 d 1,8,15 Q28; (Arm C) nab-Paclitaxel 75 mg/m2 d 1,8,15,22 Q28.

The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of three nab-Paclitaxel regimens as measured by progression-free survival (PFS), using the historical reference of PFS (based on AVADO study) of docetaxel for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Each of the three regimens is compared to the historic 7-month median PFS to determine whether any of the three regimens are worthy of further investigation. Secondary endpoints include tolerability, feasibility, response rate, OS and QoL.

Results

Two-hundred-fifty-eight pts have been randomised and 255 are available for primary endpoint evaluation. At 18.2 months' median follow-up, 182 PFS events and 85 deaths have been observed. Median PFS was 7.9 months (90%CI 6.8-8.4) in Arm A, 9.0 months (90%CI 8.1-10.9) in Arm B and 8.5 (90%CI 6.7-9.5) in Arm C. PFS in Arm B was significantly longer than the historic PFS of first-line docetaxel (one-sided log-rank p=0.03).

As expected, neurotoxicity was the most frequent adverse event. In the induction phase, grade≥2 sensory neuropathy was reported in 14.8% of pts at the starting dose of 150 mg/m2 and 7.5% at the starting dose of 125 mg/m2; grade≥3 sensory neuropathy occurred in 2.5% and 0% of the pts, respectively. In the maintenance phase, grade≥2 sensory neuropathy was reported in 37.9% of pts in Arm A, 36.1% in Arm B and 31.2% in Arm C; grade≥3 sensory neuropathy occurred in 9.1%, 5.6% and 6.6% of the pts, respectively.

199 pts started the maintenance phase. The median number of maintenance cycles was 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Stopping maintenance for reasons other than objective progression occurred in 41%, 58%, and 53%, respectively.

Conclusion

The SNAP trial indicates that alternative maintenance chemotherapy schedules with reduced doses after a short term induction phase at conventional doses are feasible and significantly more active than the historical PFS of docetaxel in the first line treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Citation Format: Gennari A, Sun Z, Hasler-Strub U, Colleoni M, Kennedy J, von Moos R, Cortes J, Vidal M, Hennessy B, Walshe J, Amillano Parraga K, Morales Murrillo S, Pagani O, Barbeaux A, Borstnar S, Rabaglio M, Maibach R, Regan MM, Jerusalem G. Randomized phase II study evaluating different schedules of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Results of the SNAP study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-05.

Abstract OT3-01-05: PANACEA (IBCSG 45-13/BIG 4-13): A phase Ib/II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in patients with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer

Background

Preclinical and correlative clinical data suggest that HER2-positive breast cancer could be amenable to immunotherapeutic approaches. We hypothesize that immune evasion contributes to tumor growth and progression in HER2-positive tumors and anti-PD1 restores T cell cytotoxicity reverting trastuzumab resistance.

Eligibility criteria

Patients with HER2-positive, PD-L1 expressing, unresectable loco-regional or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression during treatment with trastuzumab or subsequent anti-HER2 therapy of not more than 3 lines.

HER2 overexpression and PD-L1 expression confirmed in central laboratories based on tissue obtained within 1 year prior to study entry.

Objective

The primary objectives of this phase Ib/II study are to determine the recommended dose (RP2D) of pembrolizumab in combination with standard dose trastuzumab, and to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the drug combination in patients with PD-L1 positive, HER2 overexpressing unresectable loco-regional or metastatic breast cancer.

Trial design

The phase Ib portion of the trial will use a standard 3+3 design to determine the RP2D of standard-dose trastuzumab with three pembrolizumab dose levels: 2 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or a fall-back dose of 1 mg/kg. A Simon optimal two-stage design will be used in the phase II portion to assess the primary outcome of objective response. Pembrolizumab at the RP2D will be given with trastuzumab (6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks) until disease progression or lack of tolerability. The null hypothesis that the true objective response rate (ORR) is 7% will be tested against a one-sided alternative rate of 22%. In the first stage, 17 patients will be enrolled. If there are zero or one responses, enrollment will stop. Otherwise, 23 additional patients will be accrued. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 6 or more objective responses are observed in 40 evaluable patients. This design has a type-I error of 0.05 and 85% power. If the null hypothesis is true, the probability is 0.66 that enrollment will stop at the end of the first stage.

Two concurrent analyses of the data will take place at the end of the first stage. One analysis will assess ORR using the criteria described above. The second will be a detailed review of safety data.

Statistical methods

Primary and secondary endpoints will be based on patients enrolled in the phase II trial. ORR will be presented with a two-sided 90% confidence interval calculated using the method of Atkinson and Brown. The distributions of time-to-event secondary endpoints, such as duration of response and time to progression, will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier.

Present accrual and target accrual

As of 3 June 2015 11 patients have been screened for HER2 and PD-L1 positivity, and 3 successfully enrolled, completing the first dose cohort. Target enrollment of this phase Ib/II trial is 6-46 evaluable patients. Discussions are ongoing to include a PD-L1 negative cohort.

Contact information

Conducted by the International Breast Cancer Study Group and the Breast International Group in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Citation Format: Loi S, Andre F, Maibach R, Hui R, Bartsch R, Jerusalem G, Gombos A, Campone M, Bonnefoi H, Bachelot T, Curigliano G, Biganzoli L, Giobbie-Hurder A. PANACEA (IBCSG 45-13/BIG 4-13): A phase Ib/II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in patients with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-05.

Abstract OT3-1-02: The SNAP trial: Schedules of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer, International breast cancer study group (IBCSG 42-12) and breast International group (BIG 2-12)

Background

The SNAP trial aims to improve the tolerability of prolonged chemotherapy administration by studying alternative treatment schedules, while preserving and possibly improving treatment efficacy.

Trial Design

Randomized phase II study (1:1:1 randomization) evaluates each of 3 treatment arms versus a historical reference to determine whether any of the three are worthy of further investigation. All patients will begin with 3 cycles of nab-Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 days 1,8,15 every 28 days. Maintenance nab-Paclitaxel will be given every 28 days until disease progression: (A) 150 mg/m2 days 1, 15, (B) 100 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, (C) 75 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, 22.

Major Eligibility Criteria

• Histologically or cytologically confirmed HER2-negative metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer

• No prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

• Measurable or non-measurable, but radiologically evaluable, disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria

• Either ER-positive or ER-negative disease. Patients with ER-positive disease must be endocrine resistant, defined as having failed at least one prior endocrine therapy for breast cancer, or must be candidates for first-line chemotherapy

• Normal hematologic, renal, liver and cardiac functions

• No peripheral neuropathy grade 2 or higher

Specific Aim

To evaluate the efficacy of three different schedules of nab-Paclitaxel for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, measured by progression-free survival (PFS), using the historical reference of PFS for docetaxel.

Statistical Methods

The primary efficacy endpoint of PFS will be evaluated among each of the three treatment arms separately, in three independent tests, and compared to the historic PFS of first-line docetaxel. Assuming the median PFS of docetaxel is 7 months and the median PFS of a new regimen is 10 months, with 76 patients in each arm, and an accrual rate of 8 patients per month for an accrual period of 30 months plus 12 months additional follow-up, the study will have 88% power to detect an improvement in PFS in a new regimen relative to docetaxel, using a one-sample log-rank test at the one-sided significance level of 0.05. The target number of events per group is 63. The sample size of 80 patients per arm assumes a 5% drop out rate.

Accrual

Target: 240; Present: 1 (June 1, 2013)

Related Research

Translational research will investigate the prognostic role of putative markers SPARC and caveolin determined in FFPE tumor tissue from primary surgery and, if available, from metastatic biopsy. Material will be banked centrally.

Quality-of-life assessments will be conducted to explore the change in QL over time until treatment discontinuation by LASA scales for physical well-being, mood, coping effort, overall treatment burden, appetite, tiredness, hair loss and feeling sick (nausea/vomiting). Sensory neuropathy will be assessed by the 4-item subscale of the FACT/GOG-Ntx.

The SNAP trial is a collaboration through the Breast International Group (BIG). For more information about SNAP contact Dr. Rudolf Maibach, IBCSG Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland, rudolf.maibach@ibcsg.org, or the Trial Coordinators at ibcsg42_SNAP@fstrf.org.

Pharmaceutical Support Celgene; Sponsor: IBCSG.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT3-1-02.

Abstract OT3-2-06: TREND: A randomized phase II clinical trial evaluating the endocrine activity and efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix versus triptorelin in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole for locally advanced endocrine responsive breast cancer (IBCSG 41-13)

Background

The TREND trial compares endocrine activity of neoadjuvant triptorelin (Trip) and degarelix (Deg) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole for primary endocrine responsive breast cancer. Recent studies suggest that combined neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with GnRH analogues and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is effective for a selected group of premenopausal patients; degarelix, a GnRH antagonist, may induce faster ovarian suppression compared with other GnRH analogues.

Trial Design

This randomized phase II trial compares Trip and Deg in terms of time to optimal ovarian function suppression (OFS). The primary endpoint is defined as time from the first injection of Trip or Deg to the first assessment of centrally assessed 17-β-estradiol (E2) level in the range of optimal ovarian function suppression (≤2.72 pg/mL or ≤10 pmol/L) during the 6 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment. All patients receive 6 28-day cycles of neoadjuvant therapy: Trip: 3.75mg i.m. on day 1 of each cycle; Deg: 240mg s.c. cycle 1 day 1 and 80mg s.c. cycles 2-6 day 1. All patients receive 2.5mg/day continuous letrozole for all 6 cycles. Secondary endpoints include tolerability, Ki67 changes, preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score, and best overall disease response.

Major Eligibility Criteria

• Premenopausal status confirmed (E2 > 54 pg/mL (or above 198 pmol/L) within 14 days of randomization

• Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer

• ER and PgR > 50% of the cells and HER2-negative

• No hormonal treatment in previous 2 months

• No GnRH analogue, SERM or AI within 12 months prior to randomization

• Normal hematologic, renal, liver and cardiac function

Specific Aim

To compare the endocrine activity of neoadjuvant Deg and Trip in premenopausal patients also receiving letrozole.

Statistical Methods

Randomized patients receiving at least one injection in both arms will be included in primary analysis. The primary endpoint will be evaluated in both treatment arms using stratified two-sample log-rank test (two-sided Type I error) with age as stratification factor. Assuming accrual of 25 patients per treatment arm (2 patients/month over approx. 24 months), the trial will have at least 90% power to detect a targeted or pre-specified difference in time to optimal OFS. Kaplan Meier method will be used to estimate distribution of the primary endpoint.

Accrual: Target: 50 (Arm A: 25; Arm B: 25); Present: 0

Translational research

A tumor block from the diagnostic core biopsy and one from final surgery will be collected and banked for central review and future translational research.

Patient Reported Symptoms (PRS)

PRS scores will be measured at baseline, day 1 of cycles 2 and 4 and prior to surgery. E2 will be correlated with the PRS scores. Individual endocrine symptoms (FACT-ES) will be summarized over time.

Contact Information

The TREND trial is conducted and sponsored by the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Contact Dr. Rudolf Maibach, IBCSG Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland, rudolf.maibach@ibcsg.org, or the Trial Coordinators at ibcsg41_TREND@fstrf.org.

Pharmaceutical Support: Ferring.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT3-2-06.

Adjuvant perioperative portal vein or peripheral intravenous chemotherapy for potentially curative colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The perioperative use of a single course adjuvant portal vein infusion chemotherapy in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer has been shown to significantly improve overall survival but did not reduce the occurrence of liver metastases (SAKK 40/81) [Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Lancet 345(8946):349-353, 1995]. The objective of the present prospective, three-arm randomized multicenter trial was to assess whether peripheral venous administration of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C decreases the occurrence of liver metastases as well as prolongs disease-free and overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stages I-III colorectal cancer patients (n = 753) were randomized to receive either surgery alone (control arm), surgery plus postoperative portal venous infusion of 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) plus heparin given for 24 hours for seven consecutive days plus mitomycin C 10 mg/m(2) given on the first day (arm 2), or surgery and the same chemotherapy regimen administered by peripheral venous route (arm 3).

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival for the three treatment groups were 65% (control group), 60% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.18, p = 0.23), and 64% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.76); the 5-year overall survival was 72% (control group), 69% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.21, p = 0.2), and 74% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.03, p = 0.86), respectively. A significant accumulation of early deaths were observed in the portal vein infusion group (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The present prospective randomized multicenter trial provides compelling evidence that short-term perioperative chemotherapy does not improve disease-free and overall survival in patients with potentially curative colorectal cancer. In contrary, the chemotherapy regimen administered in the present investigation seems to have potentially harmful effects, a finding which should be carefully considered in the planning of future trials. Postoperative short-term administration of 5-FU plus mitomycin C either through portal infusion or a central venous catheter is not recommended for routine use in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer.

Premenopausal endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: who receives chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

The role of chemotherapy in addition to combined endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer remains an open question, yet trials designed to answer it have repeatedly failed to adequately accrue. The International Breast Cancer Study Group initiated two concurrent trials in this population: in Premenopausal Endocrine Responsive Chemotherapy (PERCHE), chemotherapy use is determined by randomization and in Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT) by physician choice. PERCHE closed with inadequate accrual; TEXT accrued rapidly.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2006, 1317 patients (890 with baseline data) were randomly assigned to receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus tamoxifen or OFS plus exemestane for 5 years in TEXT. We explore patient-related factors according to whether or not chemotherapy was given using descriptive statistics and classification and regression trees.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy was chosen for 64% of patients. Lymph node status was the predominant determinant of chemotherapy use (88% of node positive treated versus 46% of node negative). Geography, patient age, tumor size and grade were also determinants, but degree of receptor positivity and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status were not.

CONCLUSIONS

The perceived estimation of increased risk of relapse is the primary determinant for using chemotherapy despite uncertainties regarding the degree of benefit it offers when added to combined endocrine therapy in this population.

Sequential high dose chemotherapy as initial treatment for aggressive sub-types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results of the international randomized phase III trial (MISTRAL)

INTRODUCTION

Sequential high dose (SHiDo) chemotherapy with stem cell support has been shown to prolong the event-free survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

To confirm this result in a multicenter trial, we randomized patients with aggressive NHL, to receive either eight cycles of CHOP or SHiDo. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

129 evaluable patients were randomized to receive either CHOP or SHiDo: median age, 48 years; 62% male; stage III+IV: 73%; age adjusted International Prognostic Index 1/2/3: 21%/52%/27%. Toxicity grades 3+4 were more pronounced in the SHiDo-arm with 13% versus 3% of patients with fever; 34% versus 13% with infections; 13% versus 2% with esophagitis/dysphagia/gastric ulcer. The remission rates were similar in SHiDo and CHOP arms with 34%/37% complete remissions and 31%/31% partial remissions, respectively. After a median observation time of 48 months, there was no difference in overall survival at 3 years, with 46% for SHiDo and 53% for CHOP (P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter trial, early intensification with SHiDo did not confer any survival benefit in previously untreated patients with aggressive NHL and was associated with a higher incidence of grades 3/4 toxicity.

5-Fluorouracil as protracted continuous intravenous infusion can be added to full-dose docetaxel (Taxotere)-cisplatin in advanced gastric carcinoma: a phase I-II trial

BACKGROUND

A phase I-II multicenter trial was conducted to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) according to tolerance and toxicity (primary objective), as well as to describe the clinical activity, in terms of response and survival (secondary objectives), of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in protracted continuous intravenous infusion (p.i.v.) with docetaxel and cisplatin for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, World Health Organization performance status < or =1, normal hematological and renal functions, adequate hepatic function and not pretreated for advanced disease by chemotherapy, received up to eight cycles of a combination of docetaxel on day 1, cisplatin on day 1 and 5-FU p.i.v. on days 1-14 (TCF) every 3 weeks, which was escalated up to the MTD, defined by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in two patients in one dose level.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were accrued and treated (43 in the phase I part of the trial and nine additional at the recommended dose level). A median of five cycles/patient was given. The recommended dose of TCF was docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 5-FU p.i.v. 300 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14. Grade > or =3 toxicities were neutropenia 79%, alopecia 46%, fatigue 23%, mucositis 10%, diarrhea 19%, nausea/vomiting 13%, neurological 4% and palmar-plantar 2%. Ten non-fatal febrile neutropenia episodes were recorded in eight patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Among 41 patients with measurable disease (79%), we observed one complete and 20 partial responses for an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 51% (95% confidence interval 35-67%). Five patients (20%) had stable disease for > or =12 weeks (four cycles). The median overall survival was 9.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

5-FU p.i.v. at 300 mg/m(2)/day for 2 weeks out of three could be safely added to the docetaxel-cisplatin (TC) combination, but the dose of docetaxel had to be reduced to 75 mg/m(2) in a subsequent phase II trial. This drug regimen seems to be very active in advanced gastric cancer. Comparison with both TC and ECF in a randomized SAKK trial is ongoing.

Risk-adapted treatment for childhood hepatoblastoma. final report of the second study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology--SIOPEL 2

SIOPEL 2 was a pilot study designed to test the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy (CT) regimens, one for patients with hepatoblastoma (HB) confined to the liver and involving no more than three hepatic sectors ('standard-risk (SR) HB'), and one for those with HB extending into all four sectors and/or with lung metastases or intra-abdominal extra hepatic spread 'high-risk (HR) HB'. SR-HB patients were treated with four courses of cisplatin (CDDP), at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) every 14 days, delayed surgery, and then two more similar CDDP courses. HR-HB patients were given CDDP alternating every 14 days with carboplatin (CARBO), 500 mg/m(2), and doxorubicin (DOXO), 60 mg/m(2). Two courses of CARBO/DOXO and one of CDDP were given postoperatively. Between October 1995 and May 1998, 77 SR-HB (10 of whom were actually treated with the HR protocol) and 58 HR-HB patients were registered and all 135 could be evaluated. Response rates for the entire SR-HB and HR-HB groups were 90% (95% CI 80-96%) and 78% (95% CI 65-87%), and resection rates were 97% (95% CI 87-99%) and 67% (95% CI 54-79%) including several children undergoing liver transplantation. For SR-HB patients, 3-year overall and progression-free survivals were 91% (+/-7%) and 89% (+/-7%) and for the HR-HB group 53% (+/-13%) and 48% (+/-13%), respectively. The short-term toxicity of these regimens was acceptable, with no toxic deaths. A treatment strategy based on CDDP monotherapy and surgery thus appears effective in SR-HB but, despite CT intensification, only half of the HR-HB patients are long-term survivors. For SR-HB patients, the efficacy of CDDP monotherapy and the CDDP/DOXO ('PLADO') combination are now being compared in a prospective randomised trial (SIOPEL 3).

Liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma: results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) study SIOPEL-1 and review of the world experience

BACKGROUND

For hepatoblastoma (HB) that remains unresectable by partial hepatectomy after chemotherapy, total hepatectomy with orthotopic liver transplantation (LTX) has been advocated as the best treatment option. The role of LTX in the overall management of HB is still, however, unclear.

PROCEDURE

The results of LTX from the first study of HB by the International Society of Pediatric Oncology, SIOPEL-1, were analyzed. In addition, the world experience of LTX for HB was extensively reviewed. Twelve patients in the SIOPEL-1 study underwent a LTX. Median (range) follow-up at Dec. 31, 2001 was 117 months (52-125) since LTX.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 10 years post-LTX was 85% for the seven children who received a "primary LTX" and 40% for the 5 children who underwent a "rescue LTX" after previous partial hepatectomy. In the world experience (147 cases), the overall survival rate at 6 year post-LTX was 82% for 106 patients who received a "primary LTX" and 30% for 41 patients who underwent a "rescue LTX." Multivariate analysis of patients undergoing primary LTX showed that only macroscopic venous invasion had a significant impact (P-value: 0.045 with a hazard ratio of 2.96) on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthotopic LTX has added a new dimension to the treatment of HB unresectable by partial hepatectomy. Because of the rarity of the disease and to optimize results, children with extensive HB should be treated in centers with surgical expertise in pediatric major liver resection and LTX, in close collaboration with pediatric oncologists, radiologists, and histopathologists.

A randomized double-blind trial to compare the clinical efficacy of granisetron with metoclopramide, both combined with dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis

BACKGROUND

The prophylactic use of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists (setrons), after the first 24 h (acute phase) of exposure to emetic chemotherapy, to decrease the incidence of 'delayed phase' emesis increases costs. We designed a study to evaluate the efficacy of a setron (granisetron) in the delayed phase, compared with metoclopramide, each combined with a corticosteroid.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients on their first course of single-day emetic chemotherapy (cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and others) received granisetron 2 mg p.o. and dexamethasone 8 mg p.o. on day 1, followed for 5 days by dexamethasone 4 mg p.o. od combined with either metoclopramide 20 mg p.o. tds or granisetron 1 mg bd in a double-blinded double-dummy protocol. Patients evaluated the results using a diary card. Randomization was stratified by institution, sex, emetic chemotherapy naïve versus previous, alcohol consumption and platinum versus non-platinum regimen.

RESULTS

131 evaluable patients received granisetron in the delayed phase, and 127 received metoclopramide. Control of acute emesis in both arms was similar (86% granisetron; 85% metoclopramide). The 35 patients experiencing acute emesis had poor control in the delayed phase, with only four granisetron and three metoclopramide patients having no or mild nausea and no vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

In daily practice, a combination of oral dexamethasone and oral granisetron achieves an extremely high control of acute emesis (86% protection). Our data suggest that routine prescription of setrons for delayed phase control is not advisable as it increases costs without any benefit for the majority of patients. Delayed emesis in the rare patients with acute phase emesis remains an unsolved problem.

Patients' estimation of overall treatment burden: why not ask the obvious?

PURPOSE

We investigated the clinical validity of patients' estimation of overall treatment burden. This measure was expected to be responsive to the wide spectrum of reactions on treatment and thus less precise for specific effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After the first chemotherapy within a randomized, double-blind trial of the prophylaxis for delayed emesis (SAKK 90/95), 249 patients documented nausea and vomiting daily for 6 days. Over the whole period, they estimated nausea/vomiting (N/V) burden and overall treatment burden by linear analog-self assessment (LASA) indicators and documented other side effects.

RESULTS

At day 6, the two burden indicators were moderately correlated (r = 0.58) in accordance with their different concepts. No, partial, or total control of delayed emesis (days 2 to 6) was reflected in a consistent pattern by both indicators, with a stronger and more significant effect (P <.001) on changes in N/V burden than overall treatment burden. In contrast, toxicity other than N/V, assessed independently by patients and physicians, was mainly associated with overall treatment burden. Patients who indicated at least one other side effect rated their overall burden substantially higher than those with no indication of other toxicity (P <.0001). Physician-rated toxicity had a similar effect (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

A direct patient estimation of overall treatment burden by a LASA indicator may serve as an end point in clinical trials, particularly when treatments with different toxicity profiles are being compared. It is complementary to physicians' ratings of specific toxicities and a major component of patient-rated symptom checklists and quality-of-life measures.

Antibodies against recombinant heat shock protein 65 of Tropheryma whipplei in patients with and without Whipple's disease

Tropheryma whipplei is the causative agent of Whipple's disease (WD), a chronic, life-threatening infection. Laboratory diagnosis is mainly based on PCR and histopathological analysis in duodenal biopsies and other specimens requiring invasive procedures. We have examined the presence of antibodies to recombinant heat shock protein (Hsp65) of T. whipplei in patients with Whipple's disease as well as in control subjects by Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A recombinant plasmid carrying the entire T. whipplei hsp65 gene was constructed, and the expression yielded a 65-kDa histidine-tagged protein. Among four patients with Whipple's disease, two showed an IgG- and one an IgA-response, respectively, when analyzed by Western blotting, whereas from 10 patients without Whipple's disease, only two patients showed a positive IgG-response. The differences between the sera from patients and controls were thus not significant. Successful purification of the protein was achieved by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. Quantitative analysis of serum antibodies by ELISA demonstrated that antibody levels in the sera of 14 patients were not significantly higher than in those of 89 control subjects. The established ELISA test is not useful to clinical diagnostics.

Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation. an explorative investigation

We previously showed that patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer change the internal standards on which they base their quality of life estimation. In the present investigation, we explored whether this response shift similarly affects the perception of health for utility evaluation in cancer clinical trials. After radical resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon (pT1-4 pN>0 M0 and pT3-4 pN0 M0) and perioperative chemotherapy, patients were randomised to three treatment arms: observation only (A), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m(2) plus levamisol (B), or 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) (C). Subjective health was assessed by a linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) scale anchored at 'perfect health-worst health' developed for serial assessment of utility values (Hürny C, van Wegberg B, Bacchi M, et al. Subjective health estimations (SHE) in patients with advanced breast cancer: an adapted utility concept for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 1998, 77, 985-991). Patients estimated their pre-surgery health among various quality of life indicators both before surgery and retrospectively thereafter, and their pre-adjuvant health both at the beginning of randomly assigned chemotherapy or observation and retrospectively approximately 2 months later. Thereafter, current subjective health was assessed. Paired t-tests were used to test the hypotheses of no change. Patients' estimated pre-surgery health was worse after surgery than before (n=127, mean change=-6.7, standard deviation (S.D.)=30, P=0.01), and their estimated pre-adjuvant health was worse under treatment or observation than at the beginning (n=132, mean change=-7.1, S.D.=23.8, P=0.001), in agreement with the quality of life indicators. Chemotherapy had no impact on these changes attributed to a response shift. Conventionally assessed changes between the beginning of adjuvant treatment or observation and 2 months later indicated no change in subjective health. Change scores relative to patients' retrospective estimation revealed an improvement (n=122, mean change=6.6, S.D.=24.8, P=0.004) in this period. Patients with colon cancer substantially reframe their internal standard of health as they do for quality of life. This explorative finding questions the assumption, generally made in decision models, that health estimates for utility evaluation are independent of time. Given that patients may change their standards, comparisons of health estimates across different populations and clinical situations are to be interpreted with caution.

[Transfusion use in curatively operated patients with colorectal carcinomas. Swiss Study Group for Clinical Cancer Research]

OBJECTIVE

Is there an improvement of the behaviour for restrective blood transfusions after the data in the literature and especially the preliminary data of the SAKK 40/81 study have been published? They have shown a worsening of the prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer after pre-/postoperative blood transfusions have been given.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analysis of the retrospective transfusion data of the SAKK 40/81 study in comparison with the prospective transfusion data of the study SAKK 40/87.

RESULTS

The analysis of the data showed that in the SAKK 40/81 study more patients received blood transfusions than in the SAKK 40/87 study (77% versus 49%). Especially there was a diminution from 90% in the SAKK 40/81 to 59% in the SAKK 40/87 study for the rectal cancer patients respectively from 70% to 44% in the colon cancer patients having received blood transfusions. The mean value of hemoglobin of the patients not having received transfusions has decreased from 11.2 (7.8-15) g/100 ml in the SAKK 40/81 to 10.6 (5.4-15) g/100 ml in the SAKK 40/87 study (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The data of the two SAKK studies showed that in Switzerland the donation of blood transfusions in patients with colorectal cancer has continuously been handled more and more restrictive. An even more restrective use may be possible in future due to new operation techniques and the possibility of preoperative administration of erythropoetin to increase the hemoglobin level.

Prostate specific antigen in as a dynamic model in advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) is a prognostic factor after radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy respectively for prostate cancer. However, its role in patients receiving chemotherapy has not been evaluated to date.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients (pts.) with hormone resistant prostate cancer were enrolled in a prospective phase II study to receive oral Idarubicin. The drug was administered at a dose of 35 mg on day 1 and 8 of each cycle, and treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Fully evaluable for response were 26 pts. 13 of these 26 had measurable disease and 3 out of 13 had no change (NC) after therapy. Ten pts. had progression. All 13 pts. with non-measurable disease showed no response. PSA values increased exponentially over time in all pts., except for the 3 pts. with NC, in whom PSA values remained stable. Median PSADT of pts. with a rising PSA was 2.1 months (mean 2.6; range 0.7-6.1).

CONCLUSIONS

PSA levels in pts. not responding to treatment with Idarubicin rose in an exponential fashion similar to pts. who were only on hormonal therapy. PSADT should be evaluated in a larger number of hormone resistant prostate cancer pts. as a possible surrogate endpoint.

Incidence of lethal adverse drug reactions in the comprehensive hospital drug monitoring, a 20-year survey, 1974-1993, based on the data of Berne/St. Gallen

OBJECTIVES

Realising the limitations of spontaneous drug monitoring systems concerning the epidemiological aspects, a comprehensive program was founded. It was based on previous publications from the US, Canada and Northern Ireland, mainly those of the BCDSP (Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Programme).

METHODS

Drug monitoring was carried out by a group of physicians which included the medical head of each of the divisions of internal medicine, a statistician and an informatician. Only probable or definite drug event relationships were included. A probable event is defined as one in which the drug interaction was more likely to be the cause than any non-drug-related cause. The same criteria were valid for the lethal reactions.

RESULTS

In the present evaluation, we found 26 probable lethal adverse drug reactions out of a total of 48,005 patients consecutively admitted to the divisions of internal medicine of three Swiss teaching hospitals during the years 1974-1993, an incidence of 0.054%. The median age of the cohort was 68 years (range 11-103 years), of which 49% were women. The median hospital stay was 14 days and the median number of drugs was eight per patient.

CONCLUSION

The patients with a lethal outcome were presented under the eight pharmacologic-therapeutic classes of drugs and the classification proposed by NS Irey. This is based on long histopathologic experience and helps to identify preventable risks.

Docetaxel (Taxotere)-cisplatin (TC): an effective drug combination in gastric carcinoma. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), and the European Institute of Oncology (EIO)

PURPOSE

A multi-centric trial was performed to explore the clinical activity, in terms of response and toxicity (primary objectives), duration of response and survival (secondary objectives), of docetaxel with cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, performance status < or = 1, normal hematological, hepatic and renal functions and not pretreated for advanced disease by chemotherapy received up to eight cycles of TC (docetaxel 85 mg/m2 dl, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 dl) q3w. Dose escalation to 100 mg/m2 was performed in five patients and was discontinued for excessive toxicity.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were accrued. A median of 5 cycles/patient was given. We observed 2 complete and 25 partial responses for an overall intent to treat response rate of 56% (95% CI: 41%-71%). Twelve patients had stable disease for > or = 9 weeks (3 cycles). The median time to progression and overall survival were 6.6 and 9 months, respectively. Grade > or = 3 toxicities were neutropenia 81%, anemia 32%, thrombocytopenia 4%, alopecia 36%, fatigue 9%, mucositis 9%, diarrhea 6%, nausea/vomiting 4%, neurologic 2%, and one anaphylaxis precluding treatment administration. We recorded nine episodes of non-fatal febrile neutropenia in eight patients, two of them with docetaxel at 100 mg/m2. There were no direct treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

TC is active in AGC with a high response rate in a multicentric trial. Despite its hematotoxicity, this regimen is well tolerated and can be recycled as originally planned in 78% of the cases. These results may serve as basis for further developments of docetaxel containing regimens in this disease.

Response and palliation in a phase II trial of gemcitabine in hormone-refractory metastatic prostatic carcinoma. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

BACKGROUND

In a phase II trial, 43 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with gemcitabine at a dose of 1,200 mg/m2 over 2 hours (later decreased to 1,000 mg/m2 due to hematological toxicity) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were proven tumor progression after hormonal treatment and increased PSA levels, a WHO PS < or = 2, adequate bone marrow reserve, liver and renal function and age < or =, 80 years. Response criteria were based on PSA levels (CR: normalization of PSA, PR: > 50% decrease). Quality of life (QL) was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 on day 1 of each treatment cycle and on day 8 of the first cycle (range of scales 0-100). Physician-rated pain intensity and use of pain medication were assessed at the same timepoints.

RESULTS

Hematological toxicity of gemcitabine led to a dose-reduction in 48% of all cycles. Three of forty-three patients (RR = 7%) showed a PSA response: one CR and three PR with time to treatment failure of 8.7, 6.6 and > or = 9.3 months. Seven patients (16%) had stable disease (NC) for a median duration of 7.1 months (range 6.1-11.7 months). There was one case with objective regression of lymph node metastases. Patients reported a considerably impaired health status/QL (n = 41, median = 50) and severe fatigue (n = 41, median = 55.6) at baseline, with no change under treatment. Pain (QLQ-C30) was also severe at baseline (N=41, median=50) but was improved at the end of cycles 1 (n = 33, median change = -16.7, P = 0.0002), 2 (n = 19, median change = -33.3, P = 0.0006), 3 (n = 14, median change = -16.7, P = 0.06) and 4 (n = 9, median change = -33.3, P = 0.04). Patient-rated pain and use of analgesics as combined endpoint yielded palliation for at least 8 weeks in 14 patients (32%). Nine of these patients showed at least stable disease (CR/PR or NC by PSA level), five indicated a benefit in spite of progressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine in the dose and schedule indicated above has a significant beneficial impact on pain in patients with hormone-refractory prostatic carcinoma despite its limited activity in terms of PSA response and considerable, especially hematological, toxicity.

Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

We examined whether patients with colon cancer undergoing surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy change the internal standards on which they base their quality-of-life (QL) estimation, and, if they do so, whether this reframing alters interpretation of QL findings. These questions were addressed within a randomized clinical trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK 40/93).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After radical resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon (pT1-4pN > 0M0 and pT3-4pN0M0) and perioperative chemotherapy, patients were randomized to three treatment arms: observation only (A), 5-FU 450 mg/m2 plus Levamisol (B), or 5-FU 600 mg/m2 (C). QL was measured by linear analogue self-assessment indicators. Patients estimated their pre-surgery QL both before surgery and retrospectively thereafter, and their pre-adjuvant QL both at the beginning of randomly assigned chemotherapy or observation and retrospectively about two months later. Thereafter, current QL was assessed. Paired t-tests were used to test the hypotheses of no change.

RESULTS

Overall, 187 patients with at least one pair of corresponding questionnaires were analyzed. Patients estimated their pre-surgery QL after surgery significantly lower than before and their pre-adjuvant QL under treatment or observation also lower than at the beginning. In the adjuvant phase, in contradiction to our hypothesis, chemotherapy had almost no impact on these changes attributed to reframing. Conventionally assessed changes indicated an improvement in QL. Patients with treatment C reported less improvement in functional performance than those with B or those under observation (P = 0.04). Patients with treatment B indicated a greater worsening in nausea/vomiting than those with C, whereas patients with observation only showed an improvement (P = 0.0009). After adjustment of current QL scores under treatment or observation to patients' retrospective estimation, the treatment effects were diluted but the overall improvement was substantially amplified in most QL indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with colon cancer substantially reframe their perception in estimating QL both under radical resection and under adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. This effect is an integral part of patients' adaptation to disease and treatment. An understanding of this phenomenon is of particular relevance for patient care. Its role in evaluating QL endpoints in clinical trials needs further investigation.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus chlorambucil, methotrexate, and fluorouracil--11-year results of Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research trial SAKK 27/82

PURPOSE

To compare two adjuvant combination chemotherapies, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) and chlorambucil, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (LMF), for patients who had undergone potentially curative surgery for unilateral breast cancer, in terms of relapse, survival, and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Selection criteria was as follows: stage pT1-3a, N+ or N-, M0, less than 72 years of age. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) on days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 I.V. on days 1 and 8) or LMF (Leukeran [Wellcome A.G., Bern, Switzerland] 5 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 14 with the some I.V. cytostatic drugs). Follow-up examinations were performed every 3 months during the first 3 years after mastectomy, and every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were randomized, of whom 232 who were fully eligible and contribute to the analyses presented here. No statistically significant difference in favor of adjuvant CMF over LMF emerges after a median follow-up duration of 11.2 years, for either overall survival (P = .15) or disease-free survival (P = .14). A consistent trend suggestive of a possible relative benefit associated with CMF should be pointed out. However, CMF presents a significantly worse toxicity profile as concerns hematologic parameters as well as alopecia, nausea, and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

This prospective trial has not identified a statistically significant difference in disease-free survival or overall survival between the two adjuvant regimens LMF and CMF. Although a trend in favor of CMF has been observed in premenopausal patients, this has to be weighted against its definitely more pronounced toxicity profile.

A phase II study of oral idarubicin as a treatment for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma with special focus on prostate specific antigen doubling time. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Berne, Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma with chemotherapy is purely palliative, and reported response rates have been low. At the time this study was conducted, there was an urgent need for a trial using potentially efficacious drugs, with quality of life (QL), and serial prostate specific antigen (PSA) behavior as endpoints.

METHODS

In this Swiss multicenter Phase II study, 30 patients were enrolled to receive oral idarubicin. Patients were administered 35 mg idarubicin on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle, and treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Assessment was based on response rates, sequential PSA measurements in serum, toxicity, and selected aspects of QL.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 30 patients were evaluable for response, and none of them achieved a response. Three patients had stable disease as their best response, and their PSA levels also remained stable. In all other patients, PSA increased exponentially over time; the median PSA doubling time was 2.1 months (mean, 2.6; range, 0.7-6.1). Toxicity was minimal and consisted mainly of myelosuppression and nausea/vomiting. QL did not change significantly during therapy with regard to general well-being, fatigue, or nausea/vomiting. However, there were improvements in patient-rated and physician-rated pain.

CONCLUSIONS

At the dose and schedule used in this study, oral idarubicin showed only minimal efficacy against hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. In patients who did not respond, PSA doubling times were similar to those in patients who relapsed while receiving only antiandrogen therapy. In future clinical trials, QL and serial PSA behavior should be included in analysis.

Diuretic-related hypokalaemia: the role of diuretics, potassium supplements, glucocorticoids and beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists. Results from the comprehensive hospital drug monitoring programme, berne (CHDM)

All 5,047 consecutive inpatients admitted to the Internal Medicine Division of a teaching hospital (Zieglerspital, Berne) between 1982 and 1985 were registered in accordance with the CHDM (Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring) questionnaire of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Of them, 2,439 were treated with at least one potassium losing diuretic. The hospital records of the patients were reviewed with particular regard to serum potassium levels, and on the basis of this evaluation, the patients were assigned to four different diuretic treatment groups, and the incidence of hypokalaemia related to diuretic treatment was estimated. The overall rate of occurrence of hypokalaemia was 21.1% at a serum potassium level < 3.5 mmol.l-1, and 3.8% < 3.0 mmol.l-1. Hypokalaemia of less than 3.5 mml.l-1 developed 24.9% (217/870) of patients treated with potassium losing diuretics alone; in 19.7% (101/513) treated with potassium losing diuretics in conjunction with potassium substitution, in 15.1% (66/438) treated with a combination of diuretics (potassium losing with potassium sparing), and in 20.0% (12/60) treated with combined diuretics and potassium substitution. Only the differences between the first and the two subsequent groups were statistically significant. The overall incidence of hypokalaemia below 3.0 + mmol.l-1 was significantly lower in the patients on combined diuretics without potassium substitution than in the patients on potassium losing diuretics with potassium substitution. Oral or parenteral administration of glucocorticoids (prednisone 5 to 2,000 mg/d) was a significant risk factor for hypokalaemic events. beta 2-Adrenoceptor agonists had not effect. The patient's age, sex, renal function and numbers of drugs received were evaluated in a multivariate analysis, in order to take into account their influence on the risk of developing hypokalaemia. The number of drugs above 12 (and, less importantly, female sex) was the main risk factor for this ADR. The comparison between hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia in this group of inpatients showed the significance of reduced renal function in the occurrence of hyperkalaemia.

Early hematological toxicity of adjuvant perioperative intraportal and intravenous chemotherapy with fluorouracil, mitomycin and heparin in colorectal cancer. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research

BACKGROUND

From 1987 to 1993 the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) performed a randomized phase III adjuvant trial in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma with the objective of comparing intraportal versus intravenous perioperative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients younger than 75 years had a curative en bloc resection of their cancer and were then randomized into three arms: 1. adjuvant perioperative portal liver infusion with fluorouracil, mitomycin and heparin, 2. adjuvant subclavian intravenous infusion with the same regimen and 3. no adjuvant treatment. The hematological toxicity was evaluated by hemoglobin determination and leucocyte and thrombocyte counting before and during ten days after surgery.

RESULTS

Hemoglobin showed a median decrease of 22% in the control group. This decrease is aggravated significantly by 3% through the chemotherapy. Leucocytes showed a median decrease of 7% in the control group. Perioperative chemotherapy caused a significantly higher median drop; 23% when given into the liver through the portal vein and 34% when given systemically through a subclavian catheter. Thrombocytes revealed a median decrease of 25% in the control group. Chemotherapy was not associated with a significant additional drop.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil, mitomycin and Heparin as given in this study is associated with a significant mild drop in hemoglobin and leucocytes during the first 10 postoperative days. If drug dose increases are planned in future trials the addition of hematopoietic growth factors might be considered.

Type I skin reactivity to native and recombinant phospholipase A2 from honeybee venom is similar

Phospholipase A2 is the major allergen in honeybee venom. Recombinant phospholipase A2 was produced in prokaryotes and tested for its biologic activity by intracutaneous skin testing with serial 10-fold dilutions in comparison with native and deglycosylated phospholipase A2 in patients allergic to bee venom. Linear regressions of the log of the wheal area versus the log of the allergen concentration were calculated for all allergens in each patient. The relative allergenic potency of the various preparations was analyzed by comparing the linear regressions. Native phospholipase A2 was about 10 times more potent than whole bee venom. None of 58 patients allergic to bee venom was missed by testing with native phospholipase A2 alone. This allergen and deglycosylated native phospholipase A2 resulted in similar skin reactions, indicating that the sugar residues were of little relevance for IgE-binding in the patients tested. Native phospholipase A2 also had relative potency similar to that of recombinant refolded phospholipase A2, whereas recombinant nonrefolded phospholipase A2 had almost no biologic activity in skin testing. These results demonstrate in vivo activity of the recombinant bee venom allergen phospholipase A2. Although correct refolding is a prerequisite for type I skin reactivity, glycosylation seems to be less important.

[Frequency of antibiotics-associated colitis in hospitalized patients in 1974-1991 in "Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring", Bern/St. Gallen]

In 3 divisions of internal medicine of teaching hospitals of the Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring (CHDM) Foundation Bern/St Gallen, 42,920 patients consecutively admitted between 1974-1991 were investigated for adverse drug reactions. Of these 16,150 patients (38%) had received at least one systemically administered antibacterial drug during the hospital stay. Antibiotic-associated colitis included the following diagnoses: pseudomembranous colitis, hemorrhagic colitis and milder forms of colitis. We collected the data of these patients by searching for all diagnoses which might represent antibiotic-associated colitis (from the list of WHO adverse drug reaction terminology). 9 individual patients with one episode of probable antibiotic-associated colitis were found. In 5 of these cases, only one drug given during the hospital stay seemed to be implicated. An additional 32 patients were admitted with antibiotic-associated colitis in relation to treatment with the same groups of drugs before hospital admission. Based on the exposure pattern of the 9 patients with antibiotic-associated colitis compared to all patients exposed during hospital stay, we estimated the following frequencies related to the drug groups with at least 1,000 patients exposed: for all antibacterial chemotherapeutics 0.6/1000 (0.25-1.06); all penicillins 0.6/1000 (0.22-1.32), for benzyl-, phenoxy-, ureido-, isoxazolyl penicillins and methicillin 2.0/1000 (0.42-5.92) and aminopenicillin or analogues, with or without clavulanic acid 0.6/1000 (0.18-1.35). For cephalosporins the frequency is 1.4/1000 (0.17-5.12). Under sulfonamides combined with trimethoprim or related substances (5077 exposed patients) and fluoroquinolones (1043 exposed patients) no case was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Percutaneous palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice with the Wallstent endoprosthesis: follow-up and reintervention in patients with hilar and non-hilar obstruction

PURPOSE

The authors analyzed the follow-up data of 58 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who underwent percutaneous palliative treatment with Wallstents over a 4-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients had obstruction at the hilar level, and 19 patients had common bile duct obstruction without hilar involvement. Stent patency and survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Early complications occurred in 14 patients (24%) and were managed conservatively. There were two procedure-related deaths (3.4%) due to sepsis and pancreatitis, and the overall 30-day mortality was 14%. Forty-eight patients have died, nine patients are surviving (average, 11 months), and one patient was lost to follow-up. Forty-four patients (77%) experienced relief of their initial symptoms, with bilirubin levels returning to normal in 63%. The 12-month patency rate of the endoprostheses was 46% in patients with hilar obstruction and 89% in patients with non-hilar obstruction (P = .029). Late biliary complications were documented in 20 patients (35%). Thirteen patients with hilar obstruction and two patients with common duct obstruction required at least one reintervention; stent patency was restored in all patients but one. The overall 6-month survival rate was 50%, and the 12-month survival rate, 36%; no significant difference was found between patients with hilar and non-hilar obstruction.

CONCLUSION

The long-term patency of the Wallstent endoprosthesis was excellent if common duct obstruction was treated but was significantly lower in the presence of hilar involvement. Use of the Wallstent did not result in a lower complication rate compared with the reported results of plastic endoprostheses. Reinterventions to restore stent patency were successful in almost all cases. The survival of patients with hilar and with non-hilar obstruction was similar.

[Incidence of drug side effects by symptoms and syndromes. From the experiences of the Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring and the Swiss Drug Side Effect Center. As an example: allergic and pseudo-allergic reactions with mild analgesics and NSAID]

From 1974 to 1989, 37,392 patients were admitted to the divisions of general internal medicine of the CHDM hospitals. 19,082 of them were treated with a minor analgesic or an NSAID. In 95 of the exposed patients, an allergic or a pseudoallergic reaction to one or two of these drugs was observed. From 1981 to 1990, general practitioners, hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry reported to SANZ 158 individual cases with comparable reactions to 175 exposures of the same kind. Of the 15 different syndromes and symptoms registered in both institutions, most were reactions of the skin, mainly the usual maculopapular exanthemas (rash), urticaria and angioedema. In the CHDM, allergic or pseudoallergic reactions were observed in 0.23% of patients exposed to minor analgesics (including ASA preparations on a daily dose up to 1.0 g and pyrazolones, mainly metamizole, propyphenazone) and in 0.81% of patients exposed to NSAIDs (including the pyrazolone oxyphenbutazone). In the experience of the Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring in Berne and St. Gallen (CHDM) and the Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Center of Switzerland (SANZ).

[The incidence of drug side effects with reference to organ systems. Experience of the spontaneous reporting system of the Swiss Drug Side Effect Center and Comprehensive Drug Monitoring]

The reporting system of the Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Center (SANZ) and the Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring (CHDM) in Berne and St. Gallen are complementary ADR reporting institutions. The first collects data from the whole patient population as well as all drugs prescribed in Switzerland. The adverse drug reactions reported most frequently are easily detectable skin reactions, psychic disorders and reactions concerning the body as whole. From these reports signals can be generated, contributing to enhanced drug safety. The CHDM provides detailed information on all adverse drug reactions in a selected patient population. Because the number of patients exposed to a drug is known, a quantitative risk assessment can be calculated. The system contributes also to the detection of new ADRs. This relies partly on statistical analysis, partly on thorough clinical observations, but mostly on the combination of both. Allergic and pseudoallergic reactions were studied with some priority.

[Staging and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma]

Three different systems in staging colorectal cancer (TNM3, ACPS, TNM4/Dukes) have been compared in 318 patients treated at some stage of their disease at Berne University Hospital. Simultaneously, the role of some prognostic factors for survival and relapse has been analyzed. The estimated 5 years' survival rate for all patients is 42%. After complete removal of the tumor 49% of patients relapsed. In a multivariate analysis the stage, age above 80 years and the site of the primary tumor have an influence on survival and relapse. Blood transfusions had no effect on either in this analysis. The concordance of the three staging systems is good and the resultant survival curves are similar. TNM3 puts some patients with a bad prognosis into stage I. ACPS classifies patients with residual tumor after surgery with patients with distal metastasis. It has no further advantages over TNM4. TNM4 seems at present to be the best staging system. It incorporates the advantages of the well-known Dukes classification and, with possible refinements, has the qualities to be used as a standard method.