The proportion of tumor-stroma as a strong prognosticator for stage II and III colon cancer patients: validation in the VICTOR trial

BACKGROUND

The intra-tumor stroma percentage in colon cancer (CC) patients has previously been reported by our group as a strong independent prognostic parameter. Patients with a high stroma percentage within the primary tumor have a poor prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tissue samples from the most invasive part of the primary tumor of 710 patients (52% Stage II, 48% Stage III) participating in the VICTOR trial were analyzed for their tumor-stroma percentage. Stroma-high (>50%) and stroma-low (≤50%) groups were evaluated with respect to survival times.

RESULTS

Overall and disease-free survival times (OS and DFS) were significantly lower in the stroma-high group (OS P<0.0001, hazard ratio (HR)=1.96; DFS P<0.0001, HR=2.15). The 5-year OS was 69.0% versus 83.4% and DFS 58.6% versus 77.3% for stroma-high versus stroma-low patients.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the intra-tumor stroma ratio as a prognostic factor. This parameter could be a valuable and low cost addition to the TNM status and next to current high-risk parameters such as microsatellite instability status used in routine pathology reporting. When adding the stroma-parameter to the ASCO criteria, the rate of 'undertreated' patients dropped from 5.9% to 4.3%, the 'overtreated' increased with 6.8% but the correctly classified increased with an additional 14%.

TERC polymorphisms are associated both with susceptibility to colorectal cancer and with longer telomeres

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Shorter telomeres have been associated with increased risk of malignancy, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Telomere length is heritable and may be an intermediate phenotype linked to genetic susceptibility to CRC.

METHODS

In a large sample, the study investigated whether candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 'telomere biology' genes were associated with telomere length in leucocytes. SNP associated with an increased risk of CRC were searched for separately.

RESULTS

Carriers of the common allele at SNP rs10936599, near the telomerase RNA component (TERC) locus, had significantly longer telomeres. It was independently found that the same rs10936599 allele was associated with increased risk of both CRC and colorectal adenomas. Neither telomere length nor CRC risk was associated with variation near telomerase reverse transcriptase or other telomere biology genes. In silico analysis showed that SNP rs2293607 was strongly correlated with rs10936599, mapped within TERC transcripts, had a predicted effect on messenger RNA folding and lay at a reported transcription factor binding site. TERC mRNA were expressed, differing only at the alleles of rs2293607, in CRC cell line HCT116. The long-telomere/CRC-risk allele was associated with higher levels of TERC mRNA and the formation of longer telomeres.

CONCLUSIONS

Common genetic variation at TERC is associated with both longer telomeres and an increased risk of CRC, a potential mechanism being reduced levels of cell senescence or death. This finding is somewhat paradoxical, given retrospective studies reporting that CRC cases have shorter telomeres than controls. One possibility is that that association actually results from poorer survival in patients with longer telomeres.

A phase II trial of lomeguatrib and temozolomide in metastatic colorectal cancer

To evaluate the tumour response to lomeguatrib and temozolomide (TMZ) administered for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Patients with stage IV metastatic colorectal carcinoma received lomeguatrib (40 mg) and TMZ (50–200 mg m⁻²) orally for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Response was determined every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of lomeguatrib and TMZ as well as their pharmacodynamic effects in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were determined. Nineteen patients received 49 cycles of treatments. Despite consistent depletion of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in PBMC, none of the patients responded to treatment. Three patients had stable disease, one for the duration of the study, and no fall in carcinoembryonic antigen was observed in any patient. Median time to progression was 50 days. The commonest adverse effects were gastrointestinal and haematological and these were comparable to those of TMZ when given alone. This combination of lomeguatrib and TMZ is not efficacious in metastatic colorectal cancer. If further studies are to be performed, emerging data suggest that higher daily doses of lomeguatrib and a dosing period beyond that of TMZ should be evaluated.

Systemic treatment of colorectal cancer

Palliative and adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer has been, until recently, largely dependent on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Oral fluoropyrimidines have been evaluated in the advanced disease setting and they appear to be as effective as 5-FU, but are safer and more convenient for most patients. Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are new cytotoxic agents, which are active in 5-FU-resistant disease, but which may also be combined with 5-FU as initial therapy in advanced disease. Initial combination therapy leads to improved response rates and more prolonged progression-free survival compared with 5-FU monotherapy. Standard regimens for adjuvant therapy usually involve 6 months of chemotherapy using 5-FU and folinic acid. Recent trials of capecitabine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan in the adjuvant setting are ongoing, or have recently completed accrual, and may lead to a change in future clinical practice. Biological therapies are playing an increasing role in the management of colorectal cancer. Farnesyl transferase inhibition, inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are undergoing evaluation in advanced disease. In the adjuvant setting, both passive and active immunotherapeutic approaches have been studied. In addition, a large trial will evaluate the role of cyclo-oxygenase(COX)-2 inhibitors as adjuvant therapy. Further research is required in order to define the optimal sequence and combination of these different cytotoxic and biological therapies, in order to secure the best possible outcome for various subgroups of patients with both early and advanced stage colorectal cancer.

Conventional cytotoxic and novel therapeutic concepts in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of death, particularly in the Western world, leading to 400,000 deaths each year. Of the patients, 30% have advanced disease at presentation, either locally or at distant sites and chemotherapy in this setting has an established role in improving survival and palliating symptoms. In addition, approximately 50% of those patients initially believed to be cured by surgery, subsequently relapse and die of their disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy administered for six months after surgery for Dukes C colon cancer improves absolute survival by 5-10%. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in Dukes B colon or Dukes B/C rectal tumours is still controversial and is only recommended within the scope of a randomised clinical trial. Cytotoxic drug development for colorectal cancer has traditionally followed the established pathway of Phase I, Phase II and then Phase III trials in advanced disease, with subsequent translation into the adjuvant setting. For the purpose of this review current conventional chemotherapy for advanced CRC is described, followed by an explanation of newer developments that are predicated upon our increasing understanding of the molecular processes underpinning malignant transformation, invasion and metastasis. Paradigm shifts in trial design necessitated by a mechanistic approach to drug development are also discussed.

Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a challenge to clinical trial design

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with about 18 000 deaths in the UK and 56 000 in the USA each year. Despite improvements in surgical technique, radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy, 50% of patients apparently 'cured' by surgery subsequently relapse and die of the disease. There is an obvious need to develop novel rational therapies based on understanding the molecular signatures that separate tumour from normal colorectal epithelium.

Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with about 300,000 new cases and 200,000 deaths in Europe and the USA each year. Published trials have established a role for chemotherapy in colorectal cancer, in the adjuvant setting for Dukes C colon cancer, with an absolute survival benefit of about 5% and in advanced colorectal cancer, for which it improves quality of life and increases survival by 6-12 months. For rectal cancer, radiotherapy decreases rates of local recurrence and, in locally advanced disease, successfully palliates pain, tenesmus, and bleeding. The evolving understanding of colorectal carcinogenesis, in particular recognition of vital genes that may be mutated or lost during tumour development, has been translated into innovative gene therapy techniques. Finally it is increasingly apparent that surgical site specialisation and a multidisciplinary approach (including surgeons, pathologists, and oncologists) may lead to optimum outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer.