Leave no one behind: A global survey of the current state of geriatric oncology practice by SIOG national representatives

INTRODUCTION

The Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations include a commitment to "leave no one behind" as a universal goal. To achieve this in geriatric oncology (GO) worldwide, it is important to understand the current state of GO at an international level. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) has several National Representatives (NRs) who act as SIOG's delegates in their respective countries. The NRs took part in this international survey exploring the state of GO practice, identifying barriers and solutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The NRs answered open-ended questions by email from February 2020 to October 2022. The questionnaire domains included the demographic information of older adults for their countries, and the NRs' opinions on whether GO is developing, what the barriers are to developing GO, and proposed actions to remove these barriers. The demographic data of each country reported in the survey was adjusted using literature and database searches.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of thirty countries with NRs (70%) participated in this questionnaire study: 12 European, four Asian, two North American, two South American, and one Oceanian. The proportion of the population aged ≥75 years varied from 2.2% to 15.8%, and the average life expectancy also varied from 70 years to 86 years. All NRs reported that GO was developing in their country; four NRs (18%) reported that GO was well developed. Although all NRs agreed that geriatric assessment was useful, only three reported that it was used day-to-day in their countries' clinical practice (14%). The major barriers identified were the lack of (i) evidence to support GO use, (ii) awareness and interest in GO, and (iii) resources (time, manpower, and funding). The major proposed actions were to (i) provide new evidence through clinical trials specific for GO patients, (ii) stimulate awareness through networking, and (iii) deliver educational materials and information to healthcare providers and medical students.

DISCUSSION

This current survey has identified the barriers to GO and proposed actions that could remove them. Broader awareness seems to be essential to implementing GO. Additional actions are needed to develop GO within countries and can be supported through international partnerships.

Update on the management of older patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a perspective from medical oncology

In the context of pancreatic cancer, surgical intervention is typically recommended for localized tumours, whereas chemotherapy is the preferred approach in the advanced and/or metastatic setting. However, pancreatic cancer is closely linked to ageing, with an average diagnosis at 72 years. Paradoxically, despite its increased occurrence among older individuals, this population is often underrepresented in clinical studies, complicating the decision-making process. Age alone should not determine the therapeutic strategy but, given the high comorbidity and mortality of this disease, a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is necessary to define the best treatment, prevent toxicity, and optimize older patient care. In this review, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (Grupo Español de Tratamiento de los Tumores Digestivos, TTD), and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Cáncer Digestivo, GEMCAD) have assessed the available scientific evidence and propose a series of recommendations on the management and treatment of the older population with pancreatic cancer.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for high-grade gliomas of adulthood (2022)

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are the most common primary brain malignancies and account for more than half of all malignant primary brain tumors. The new 2021 WHO classification divides adult HGG into four subtypes: grade 3 oligodendroglioma (1p/19 codeleted, IDH-mutant); grade 3 IDH-mutant astrocytoma; grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and grade 4 IDH wild-type glioblastoma (GB). Radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CTX) are the current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed HGG. Several clinically relevant molecular markers that assist in diagnosis and prognosis have recently been identified. The treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas is not well defined and decision-making is usually based on prior strategies, as well as several clinical and radiological factors. Whereas the prognosis for GB is grim (5-year survival rate of 5-10%) outcomes for the other high-grade gliomas are typically better, depending on the molecular features of the tumor. The presence of neurological deficits and seizures can significantly impact quality of life.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guideline of systemic therapy and management of brain central nervous system metastases (2021)

Central nervous system (CNS) dissemination is a severe complication in cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common types of malignant intracranial tumors and are reported in approximately 25% of patients with metastatic cancers. The recent increase in incidence of BMs is due to several factors including better diagnostic assessments and the development of improved systemic therapies that have lower activity on the CNS. However, newer systemic therapies are being developed that can cross the blood-brain barrier giving us additional tools to treat BMs. The guidelines presented here focus on the efficacy of new targeted systemic therapies and immunotherapies on CNS BMs from breast, melanoma, and lung cancers.

Long-term results of the GEINO 1401 TRIAL: Randomizing patients to stop or to continue temozolomide until 12 cycles

2013

Background: We previously presented our results of the GEINO 1401 trial that randomized patients diagnosed with glioblastoma and treated with chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) followed by six cycles of TMZ, to receive an extended use of TMZ up to 12 cycles or to control. We found no differences in 6-months neither progression free survival (PFS) nor overall survival (OS). In this report we actualize our results and analyse long-term survivor patients (LTSP). Methods: The trial NCT02209948 randomized (ratio 1:1) 159 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma who had been treated with standard therapy to stop treatment or to continue up to 12 cycles of TMZ. Patients were stratified based on their O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferasa (MGMT) methylation status and presence or absence of measurable disease at inclusion. We update here OS outcomes and analyse the data of LTSP defined as an OS over 30 months from diagnosis. Results: At a median follow-up of 20 months, 82.4% of the patients had died and 89.9% had progressed. The median OS from randomization was 22.0 months for the control arm and 18.2 for the experimental arm: HR 0.957 (95%CI 0.806-1.136, p = 0.615). At 2 years from randomization there were a 61% of survivors in the TMZ group and 62% in the control group. There were a 49.7% of LTSP showing no differences between TMZ and control group. We found a higher prevalence of methylated MGMT in LTSP, but no differences were shown in patients with or without measurable disease at inclusion, status of IDH and the use of bevacizumab after progression. Conclusions: Adding 6 cycles of TMZ after the first 6 adjuvant cycles confers no additional benefit in OS. Nearly 50% of the patients included in GEINO 1401 who had been previously treated with TMZ 6 cycles without progressing were LTSP. Clinical trial information: NCT02209948.

Impact of surgery versus other treatment options in recurrent glioblastoma. Analysis of the Spanish Group of Neurooncology Research (GEINO) RETSINE database

e14047

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain primary tumor. Almost all patients have recurrent disease after initial treatment with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. After disease recurrence, there is no standardized treatment and reoperation is common but there is no proven benefit in randomized trials. Here we retrospectively review the Spanish national database to identify the frequency of reoperations in recurrent GBM and to analyze the impact of surgery on survival in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed relapsed GBM patients from the Spanish national database RETSINE (Registro Nacional Español de Tumores del Sistema Nervioso Central) supported by the GEINO group. Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test were used to compare survival. Results: The number of patients with recurrent GBM analyzed was 538, 40% were women and 60% were men. The MGMT status was: methylated 30.9%, unmethylated 33.8%, unknown 35.3%. A total of 89.9% of the patients received radiotherapy and 88.7% received chemotherapy after initial surgery. The median progression-free survival until first recurrence was 7.63 months (IC95% 6.97-8.29). Median overall survival (OS) from GBM diagnosis was 11.96 months (IC95% 10.69- 23.23). At the time of the first progression, surgery was performed in 75 patients, (13.9%), 18 cases were treated with a second radiotherapy (3.3%), second line CT was administered in 268 patients (49.6%), 221 cases received only chemotherapy (40.9%), 47 cases were treated with both surgery and chemotherapy (8.7%); 28 were treated with surgery without chemotherapy (5.2%), 19 cases had a surgery procedure but we have no data about CT, 223 cases did nor receive CT nor surgery (41%). Median overall survival after relapse was 4.06 months (IC95% 3.25-4.87). For those patients without surgery, median OS after relapse was 3.1 m (IC95% 2.84-3.71) and for patients reoperated, median OS was 12.2 m (IC95% 10.8-13.52) p=0.00 Median overall survival after relapse was 1.7 months (IC95% (IC 1.31-2.08) for patients that did not had CT and 7.03 for those with CT(IC95%5.9-8.16) p=0.00 We also compared the results from different treatment options: median OS was 1.6 m (IC95% 1.11-2.08), for patients without treatment; 6.33 m (IC95% 5.34-7.32) for patients treated with chemotherapy; 12.2 m (IC95%11.05-13.34) for patients treated with surgery and CT;12.1 m(IC95% 4.64-19.55) for patients with surgery. Conclusions: Recurrent glioblastoma is a very aggressive disease. In this retrospective study, patients treated with surgery and surgery and CT could have a clinical benefit in terms of survivalin comparison with those not treated with reoperation. Randomized prospective trials are needed to clarify the role of surgery in recurrent GBM.

Phase II trial of durvalumab plus tremelimumab with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) in patients (pts) with localized muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with a selective bladder preservation approach: IMMUNOPRESERVE-SOGUG trial

4505

Background: Bladder-preserving combined-modality therapies constitute an alternative to radical cystectomy for selected pts with MIBC. In preclinical studies, combination of radiation and dual checkpoint blockade appears to activate non-redundant immune mechanisms, potentiating antitumor activity. The purpose of the present study is to explore feasibility, toxicity and activity of this approach in MIBC. Methods: Pts with localized MIBC in clinical stages T2-4a N0 M0, ECOG 0-1, without contraindications to immunotherapy, who either wished for bladder preservation or were ineligible for cystectomy, were included in this phase II study. Treatment consisted of initial transurethral resection (TUR) of the tumor, followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg i.v. plus tremelimumab 75 mg i.v., every 4 weeks for 3 doses. Normofractionated external-beam RT was started 2 weeks later, at doses of 46 Gy to minor pelvis and 64-66 Gy to bladder. Pts with either residual or relapsed MIBC were offered salvage cystectomy. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) defined as absence of MIBC at post-treatment tumor site biopsy. A 2-stage sequential design was used (CR rate P0=5, P1=0.7, α=0.10, β=0.20) requiring at least 6 CR in the first 12 pts to expand to a second cohort of 20 pts. Results: From 1/2019 to 8/2020, 32 pts were enrolled at 6 centers. Median age was 71 years (49-91). PS was 0 in 24 pts,1 in 8. 25 were males. Clinical stage was T2 in 28 pts, T3 in 3 and T4a in 1. All pts received at least two immunotherapy cycles. The median dose of RT administered was 64 Gy (60-65). CR at post-treatment biopsy was documented in 26 (81%) pts, 2 pts had residual MIBC and 4 pts were not evaluated due to rejection (1), clinical impairment (1), death from COVID 19 (1) and a suspected treatment-related death from peritonitis (1). After a median follow up of 6.1 months (2.5 - 20.1), 2 pts underwent salvage cystectomy because of MIBC and T1 relapses, respectively. The estimated 6-months rates for disease-free survival (DFS) with bladder intact, DFS and overall survival were 76% (95%CI, 61%-95%), 80% (95%CI, 66%-98%) and 93% (95%CI, 85%-100%), respectively. A total of 31 (97%) pts experienced adverse events related to RT and/or immunotherapy, with diarrhea (41%) and urinary disorders (37.5%) as the most frequent. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to therapy were reported in 31% pts, being the most frequent gastrointestinal toxicity (12.5%), acute kidney failure (6%) and hepatitis (6%). Conclusions: A combined-modality approach including durvalumab + tremelimumab with concurrent RT is feasible and safe, showing high efficacy in terms of response and eliciting bladder preservation in a large number of pts. Further research on this approach as an alternative to cystectomy is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03702179.

Lenvatinib (LEN) + pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Final results of a phase 1b/2 trial

e16542

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are commonly used as first-line treatment for pts with advanced RCC. In the recent phase 3 CLEAR trial, LEN + PEMBRO showed improved objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) vs sunitinib in first-line treatment of advanced RCC (Motzer R et al. NEJM. 2021). Additional treatment options are needed for pts with disease progression on ICIs. A phase 1b trial of LEN + PEMBRO was performed in multiple tumor types and included an expansion part into a phase 2 cohort of ICI-pretreated, treatment-naïve, or previously treated ICI-naïve pts with metastatic RCC (NCT02501096). We report the final results of the RCC cohort with an extended follow-up. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥18 years old and had measurable disease. Efficacy analyses were conducted by prior therapy grouping. The primary endpoint was ORR at week 24 (ORRwk24) per immune-related (ir) RECIST by investigator assessment. Secondary endpoints included ORR, duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included tumor response assessed per RECIST v1.1 by independent review committee (IRC). Subgroup analyses of the ICI-pretreated group will be included in the poster. Results: The recommended doses determined in phase 1b were LEN 20 mg daily + PEMBRO 200 mg once every 3 weeks (Taylor M et al. JCO. 2020). The study enrolled 145 pts (efficacy analysis, n=143; safety analysis, n=145). At data cutoff (August 18, 2020), the median follow-up time was 19.8 months. The ORRwk24 was 55.8% (95% CI 45.7–65.5) for ICI-pretreated pts (n=104), 72.7% (95% CI 49.8–89.3) for treatment-naïve pts (n=22), and 41.2% (95% CI 18.4–67.1) for previously treated ICI-naïve pts (n=17). The median OS for the previously treated ICI-naïve pts was 30.3 months and was not reached in the other groups. Additional efficacy analyses are shown in the table. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 99.3% of pts; the most common were fatigue (58.6%), diarrhea (55.2%), and hypertension (40.0%). Most pts (69%) maintained the LEN starting dose or were reduced to LEN 14 mg daily (dose level −1). Conclusions: LEN + PEMBRO demonstrated promising antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in pts with metastatic RCC, including pts who were ICI-pretreated. Clinical trial information: NCT02501096. [Table: see text]

Elderly glioblastoma patients: Survival analysis according adjuvant therapy and tumor molecular analysis

e14046

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) grade IV represents the most frequent and aggressive primary brain tumor. Despite complete surgical resection, GBM infiltrative potential leads to local recurrence rates of around 100%. Standard treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) according Stupp regimen aims to reduce relapse and improve survival, but toxicities associated with these therapies represent a problem in elderly unfit population. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status has been recognized as a predictive factor of response to alkylating agents as temozolomide. We aimed to compare overall survival (OS) results in elderly GBM patients according with MGMT promoter status and systemic treatment after surgery. Methods: We performed a database from the information available from RETSINE (Registro Nacional Español de Tumores de Sistema Nervioso Central). We selected ≥ 65 years GBM diagnosed patients. Relevant information was tumor MGMT promoter methylation status and adjuvant CT and/or RT after resection. Kaplan- Meier analysis was performed. Selected outcome was OS and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p value < 0.05 were used as measures of statistical significance. Results: We identified 400 eligible GBM patients diagnosed ≥ 65 years (male = 232- 58%; female = 168-42% ). According tumor MGMT status: 125 (31.3%) methylated tumors, 115 (28.7%) non methylated and 160 unknown MGMT status. Included population median age was 72 years (65-88 years). Median global population OS was 7.93 months (IC95% 6.84-9.02). Survival analysis showed better OS for methylated tumors group, median OS 7.33 (IC 95%4.1-10.56) vs. unmethylated OS 7.06 (IC95% 4.9-9.1) (p = 0.021). Survival analysis in methylated patients showed improved OS in patients treated with RT + CT vs. no adjuvant therapy. Median OS for methylated patients treated with CT + RT was 11.46m (IC95%7.6-15.9) vs 9.6 months with only RT(IC95%3.67-7.26) and 2.1m with no treatment (IC95%2.03-3.76) p = 0,00. Unmethylated patients median OS was 9.36m (IC95%3.67-7.26) for RT-CT, 5.4 m (IC95%2.37-8.42) for RT only and 2.76 (IC95% 1.37-4.15) for no treatment p = 0.00. Conclusions: Elderly GBM patients have similar treatment options than young patients and comprise surgical resection, RT and alkylating CT with temozolomide. Comorbidities and performance status have relevant implications in elderly population treatment decisions. The MGMT promoter status has been described as a prognostic and predictive marker of response to temozolomide. In our series both methylated and unmethylated patients can benefit with systemic treatment.

Delphi consensus on strategies in the management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and bothersome adverse event related with opioid therapy in cancer patients. Despite the high prevalence, medical management of OIC is often uncertain. The current project aimed to investigate expert opinion on OIC management and provide practical recommendations to improve the clinical approach of OIC in cancer patient.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was conducted involving 46 different physicians experts in OIC. Using a structured questionnaire of 67 items this project intended to seek consensus on aspects related to diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life of cancer patients suffering with OIC.

RESULTS

After two rounds, a consensus was reached in 91% of the items proposed, all in agreement. Agreement was obtained on OIC definition (95.7%). Objective and patient-reported outcomes included in that definition should be assessed routinely in clinical practice. Responsive to symptom changes and easy-to-use assessment tools were recommended (87.2%). Successful diagnosis of OIC requires increase clinicians awareness of OIC and proactivity to discuss symptoms with their patients (100%). Successful management of OIC requires individualization of the treatment (100%), regular revaluation once is established, and keeping it for the duration of opioid treatment (91.5%). Oral Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists (PAMORAs), were considered good alternatives for the treatment of OIC in cancer patients (97.9%). This drugs and laxatives can be co-prescribed if OIC coexist with functional constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

The panelists, based on their expert clinical practice, presented a set of recommendations for the management of OIC in cancer patients.

[Sentinel lymph node in pulmonary carcinoma. Molecular study after radioisotope detection]

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic lymph node affectation is the main prognostic factor in localized lung cancer. Pathological study of the obtained samples even after an adequate lymphadenectomy, present tumoral relapses of 40% of stage I patients after oncological curative surgery. In this paper we have studied micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node by molecular methods in patients with stage I lung cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The sentinel node was marked by injecting peritumorally performed just after performing the thoracotomy with 2 mCi of nanocoloid of albumin (Nanocol®) marked with 99mTc in 0.3 ml. Guided with a Navigator® gammagraphic sensor, we proceeded to its resection. RNA of the tissue was extracted and the presence of genes CEACAM5, PLUNC and CK7 in mRNA was studied.

RESULTS

Twenty nine 29 patients were included. Of the tested genes, CEACAM5 and PLUNC were the ones that showed a high expression in lung tissue. Of the 29 analyzed sentinel lymph nodes, 7 (24%) were positive in the molecular study. A positive sentinel lymph node was found in 4/7 adenocarcinomas and 3/12 squamous-cell tumors. Affected lymph nodes were: station 5 (1/3), station 7 (0/6), station 9 (0/1); station 10 (5/11); station 11 (1/1).

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of sentinel node in patients with stage I lung cancer by marking with radioisotope is a feasible technique. The application of molecular techniques shows the tumoral affectation in cases staged as stage I.