Low frequency of community-acquired bacterial co-infection in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 based on clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We defined the frequency of respiratory community-acquired bacterial co-infection in patients with COVID-19, i.e. patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR or a COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) score ≥ 4, based on a complete clinical assessment, including prior antibiotic use, clinical characteristics, inflammatory markers, chest computed tomography (CT) results and microbiological test results.

METHODS

Our retrospective study was conducted within a cohort of prospectively included patients admitted for COVID-19 in our tertiary medical centres between 1-3-2020 and 1-6-2020. A multidisciplinary study team developed a diagnostic protocol to retrospectively categorize patients as unlikely, possible or probable bacterial co-infection based on clinical, radiological and microbiological parameters in the first 72 h of admission. Within the three categories, we summarized patient characteristics and antibiotic consumption.

RESULTS

Among 281 included COVID-19 patients, bacterial co-infection was classified as unlikely in 233 patients (82.9%), possible in 35 patients (12.4%) and probable in 3 patients (1.1%). Ten patients (3.6%) could not be classified due to inconclusive data. Within 72 h of hospital admission, 81% of the total study population and 78% of patients classified as unlikely bacterial co-infection received antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 patients are unlikely to have a respiratory community-acquired bacterial co-infection. This study underpins recommendations for restrictive use of antibacterial drugs in patients with COVID-19.

Quantification and Explanation of the Variability of First-Dose Amikacin Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis

BACKGROUND

There may be a difference between the determinants of amikacin exposure in emergency department (ED) versus intensive care (ICU) patients, and the peak amikacin concentration varies widely between patients. Moreover, when the first dose of antimicrobials is administered to septic patients admitted to the ED, fluid resuscitation and vasopressors have just been initiated. Nevertheless, population pharmacokinetic modelling data for amikacin in ED patients are unavailable.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to quantify the interindividual variability (IIV) in the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in patients admitted to the ED and to identify the patient characteristics that explain this IIV.

METHODS

Patients presenting at the ED with severe sepsis or septic shock were randomly assigned to receive amikacin 25 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg intravenously. Blood samples were collected at 1, 6 and 24 h after the onset of the first amikacin infusion. Data were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.

RESULTS

A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on 279 amikacin concentrations from 97 patients. The IIV in clearance (CL) and central distribution volume (V₁) were 71% and 26%, respectively. Body mass index (BMI), serum total protein level, serum sodium level, and fluid balance 24 h after amikacin administration explained 30% of the IIV in V₁, leaving 18% of the IIV unexplained. BMI and creatinine clearance according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation 24 h after amikacin administration explained 46% of the IIV in CL, and 39% remained unexplained.

CONCLUSION

The IIV of amikacin pharmacokinetics in ED patients is large. Higher doses may be considered in patients with low serum sodium levels, low total protein levels, or a high fluid balance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02365272.

Pharmacokinetic Modelling to Predict FVIII:C Response to Desmopressin and Its Reproducibility in Nonsevere Haemophilia A Patients

Background Nonsevere haemophilia A (HA) patients can be treated with desmopressin. Response of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) differs between patients and is difficult to predict.

Objectives Our aims were to describe FVIII:C response after desmopressin and its reproducibility by population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling.

Patients and Methods Retrospective data of 128 nonsevere HA patients (age 7–75 years) receiving an intravenous or intranasal dose of desmopressin were used. PK modelling of FVIII:C was performed by nonlinear mixed effect modelling. Reproducibility of FVIII:C response was defined as less than 25% difference in peak FVIII:C between administrations.

Results A total of 623 FVIII:C measurements from 142 desmopressin administrations were available; 14 patients had received two administrations at different occasions. The FVIII:C time profile was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Interindividual variability of the estimated baseline FVIII:C, central volume of distribution and clearance were 37, 43 and 50%, respectively. The most recently measured FVIII:C (FVIII-recent) was significantly associated with FVIII:C response to desmopressin (p < 0.001). Desmopressin administration resulted in an absolute FVIII:C increase of 0.47 IU/mL (median, interquartile range: 0.32–0.65 IU/mL, n = 142). FVIII:C response was reproducible in 6 out of 14 patients receiving two desmopressin administrations.

Conclusion FVIII:C response to desmopressin in nonsevere HA patients was adequately described by a population PK model. Large variability in FVIII:C response was observed, which could only partially be explained by FVIII-recent. FVIII:C response was not reproducible in a small subset of patients. Therefore, monitoring FVIII:C around surgeries or bleeding might be considered. Research is needed to study this further.

Predicting the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid: a computer simulation

The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was investigated with a computer simulation model. For a fixed-dose (FD) and a concentration-controlled (CC) MMF dosing regimen exposure to mycophenolic acid (MPA) was compared. A nonlinear mixed-effects model (NONMEM) for MPA based on extensive pharmacokinetic data from 140 renal transplant recipients who all used cyclosporine and corticosteroids as maintenance immunosuppressive therapy provided Bayesian estimates for MPA oral clearance on 9 occasions during the first 24 weeks after transplantation. In 45 of these patients, the estimates for MPA oral clearance were used to calculate values for the area under the curve (AUC) of MPA. In the CC group, MMF doses were adjusted based on the calculated AUC, targeting at an AUC level of 45 mg.h/L. In the FD group, MMF doses were fixed at 1000 mg. On day 7 after transplantation, significantly more AUC values were on target (AUC range 30-60 mg.h/L) in the CC group than in the FD group: 76% versus 13%, respectively, P < 0.001. To accomplish this, a doubling of MMF dose was necessary in more than half of the patients after the AUC assessment on day 3 after transplantation. Between-patient variability (BPV) in AUC (average CV% for all occasions) was reduced in the CC regimen: 23% versus 44% in the FD group. By using TDM, adequate MPA exposure appears to be obtained more rapidly, and BPV in exposure is reduced. To reach target AUC levels as soon as possible in this cyclosporine-treated population, it appears that larger MMF doses as currently recommended are necessary in the first month after transplantation.