1
|
McDonald AM, DeMora L, Yang ES, Hoyle JM, Lenzie A, Williams GR, Michalski JM, Yee D, Bahary JP, Den RB, Roach M, Dess R, Mishra MV, Valicenti RK, Lau HY, Marcrom SR, Souhami L, Mendez LC, Chen Y, Doncals DE, Pugh SL, Feng FY, Sandler HM. Body composition and mortality in men receiving prostate radiotherapy: A pooled analysis of NRG/RTOG 9406 and NRG/RTOG 0126. Cancer 2023; 129:685-696. [PMID: 36579470 PMCID: PMC10231027 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate the association between body composition and mortality in men treated with radiation for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Secondarily, to integrate body composition as a factor to classify patients by risk of all-cause mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants of NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with archived computed tomography were included. Muscle mass and muscle density were estimated by measuring the area and attenuation of the psoas muscles on a single slice at L4-L5. Bone density was estimated by measuring the attenuation of the vertebral body at mid-L5. Survival analyses, including Cox proportional hazards models, assessed the relationship between body composition and mortality. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to create a classification tree to classify participants by risk of death. RESULTS Data from 2066 men were included in this study. In the final multivariable model, psoas area, comorbidity score, baseline prostate serum antigen, and age were significantly associated with survival. The RPA yielded a classification tree with four prognostic groups determined by age, comorbidity, and psoas area. Notably, the classification among older (≥70 years) men into prognostic groups was determined by psoas area. CONCLUSIONS This study strongly supports that body composition is related to mortality in men with localized PCa. The inclusion of psoas area in the RPA classification tree suggests that body composition provides additive information to age and comorbidity status for mortality prediction, particularly among older men. More research is needed to determine the clinical impact of body composition on prognostic models in men with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Lyudmila DeMora
- Statistics and Data Management Department, NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Statistical and Data Management Department, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eddy S. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - John M. Hoyle
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Andrew Lenzie
- School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Grant R. Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jeff M. Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Don Yee
- Radiation Oncology Department of Radiation Oncology, Edmonton Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Bahary
- Department of Radio Oncology, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert B. Den
- Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Mark V. Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland/Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard K. Valicenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Harold Y. Lau
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Samuel R. Marcrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Luis Souhami
- The Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lucas C. Mendez
- Department of Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuhchyau Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Desiree E. Doncals
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Summa Health System - Akron Campus, Akron, Ohio, USA
| | - Stephanie L. Pugh
- Statistics and Data Management Department, NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Statistical and Data Management Department, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Medical Center-Mission Bay, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Howard M. Sandler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quinn TJ, Chapman D, Parzen J, Wahl DR, McNamara A, Dess R, Chan J, Feng F, Jackson WC, Hamstra D. Validation of the Combination Gleason Score as an Independent Favorable Prognostic Factor in Prostate Cancer Treated With Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e166-e175. [PMID: 36503624 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prognostic factors for prostate cancer include tumor, node, metastases stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and pathology (via Gleason score [GS] or grade group). Of these, GS yields the largest effect on prostate cancer specific mortality. It was previously determined that those with cores with a mix of higher and lower GS at biopsy (which was termed a "ComboGS") had decreased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality after either surgical or radiation treatment. We validate the effect of ComboGS in an independent cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) at 2 institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS DE-RT was administered to 2539 men, of which 687 men had a ComboGS. To further ascertain the ComboGS effect we employed the modified Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (mCAPRA) score. Rates of biochemical event-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were compared across CAPRA scores, with and without modification, and the prognostic value of the CAPRA scores was compared using Harrel's concordance index. RESULTS On univariate analysis in Gleason 7 to 10 patients the presence of ComboGS improved 10-year biochemical event-free survival from 76.6% to 82.4% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; P = .021), 10-year distant metastasis-free survival from 89.3% to 93.2% (HR, 0.57; CI, 0.39-0.85; P = .005), 10-year prostate cancer specific survival from 93.9% to 97.4% (HR, 0.39; CI, 0.21-0.7; P = .001), and 10-year overall survival from 65.7% to 75.6% (HR, 0.69; CI, 0.57-0.83; P < .001). Multivariable analysis also supported that ComboGS is protective for biochemical failure (HR, 0.64; CI, 0.50-0.83; P < .001), distant metastasis (HR, 0.42; CI, 0.28-0.63; P < .001), death from prostate cancer (HR, 0.32; CI, 0.17-0.58; P < .001), and overall mortality (HR, 0.65; CI, 0.54-0.79; P < .001). Additionally, adjusting the mCAPRA score for ComboGS decreased the risk of biochemical failure by nearly 30% (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .003) and by 50% (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.80; P = .002) for distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS ComboGS is a useful and readily available independent prognostic factor for all clinical endpoints evaluated. Moreover, the ComboGS can be used in conjunction with the extensively validated CAPRA scoring to better risk stratify patients being treated with definitive DE-RT for GS 7 to 10 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason Chan
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Felix Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoon WS, Kim JT, Han YM, Chung DS, Park YS, Lizarraga KJ, Allen-Auerbach M, De Salles AA, Yong WH, Chen W, Ruge MI, Kickingereder P, Simon T, Treuer H, Sturm V, D'Alessandro PR, Jarrett J, Walling SA, Fleetwood IG, Kim TG, Lim DH, McGovern SL, Grosshans D, McAleer MF, Chintagumpala M, Khatua S, Vats T, Mahajan A, Beauchesne PD, Faure G, Noel G, Schmitt T, Martin L, Jadaud E, Carnin C, Astradsson A, Rosenschold PMA, Lund AKW, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Roed H, Juhler M, Kumar N, Kumar R, Sharma SC, Mukherjee KK, Khandelwal N, Kumar R, Gupta PK, Bansal A, Kapoor R, Ghosal S, Barney CL, Brown AP, Lowe MC, McAleer MF, Grosshans DR, de Groot JF, Puduvalli V, Gilbert MR, Vats TS, Brown PD, Mahajan A, Pollock BE, Stafford SL, Link MJ, Brown PD, Garces YI, Foote RL, Ryu S, Kim EY, Yechieli R, Kim JK, Mikkelsen T, Kalkanis S, Rock J, Prithviraj GK, Oppelt P, Arfons L, Cuneo KC, Vredenburgh J, Desjardins A, Peters K, Sampson J, Chang Z, Kirkpatrick J, Nath SK, Sheridan AD, Rauch PJ, Contessa JN, Yu JB, Knisely JP, Minja FJ, Vortmeyer AO, Chiang VL, Koto M, Hasegawa A, Takagi R, Sasahara G, Ikawa H, Kamada T, Iwadate Y, Matsutani M, Kanner AA, Sela G, Gez E, Matceyevsky D, Strauss N, Corn BW, Brachman DG, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Sorensen S, Redmond KJ, Mahone EM, Kleinberg L, Terezakis S, McNutt T, Agbahiwe H, Cohen K, Lim M, Wharam M, Horska A, Amendola B, Wolf A, Coy S, Blach L, Mesfin F, Suki D, Mahajan A, Rao G, Palkonda VAR, More N, Ganesan P, Kesavan R, Shunmugavel M, Kasirajan T, Maram VR, Kakkar S, Upadhyay P, Das S, Nigudgi S, Katz JS, Knisely JP, Ghaly M, Schulder M, Palkonda VAR, More N, Shunmugavel M, Kasirajan T, Ganesan P, Kakkar S, Maram VR, Nigudgi S, Upadhyay P, Das S, Kesavan R, Taylor RB, Schaner PE, Dragovic AF, Markert JM, Guthrie BL, Dobelbower MC, Spencer SA, Fiveash JB, Katz JS, Knisely JP, Ghaly M, Schulder M, Chen L, Guerrero-Cazares H, Ford E, McNutt T, Kleinberg L, Lim M, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Redmond K, Wernicke AG, Chao KC, Nori D, Parashar B, Yondorf M, Boockvar JA, Pannullo S, Stieg P, Schwartz TH, Leeman JE, Clump DA, Flickinger JC, Burton SA, Mintz AH, Heron DE, O'Neil SH, Wong K, Buranahirun C, Gonzalez-Morkos B, Brown RJ, Hamilton A, Malvar J, Sposto R, Dhall G, Finlay J, Olch A, Reddy K, Damek D, Gaspar L, Ney D, Kavanagh B, Waziri A, Lillehei K, Stuhr K, Chen C, Kalakota K, Offor O, Patel R, Dess R, Schumacher A, Helenowski I, Marymont M, Sperduto P, Chmura SJ, Mehta M, Zadeh G, Shi W, Liu H, Studenski M, Fu L, Peng C, Gunn V, Rudoler S, Farrell C, Andrews D, Chu J, Turian J, Rooney JW, Ramiscal JAB, Laack NN, Shah K, Surucu M, Melian E, Anderson D, Prabhu V, Origitano T, Sethi A, Emami B. CLIN-RADIATION THERAPY. Neuro Oncol 2012; 14:vi133-vi141. [PMCID: PMC3488792 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
|