1
|
Fabozzi G, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Vaiarelli A, Badajoz V, Aura M, Canosa S, Bongioanni F, Benini F, Livi C, Zacà C, Borini A, Alviggi E, Iussig B, Hebles M, Sànchez P, Cimadomo V, Rienzi L, Llàcer J. Association between oocyte donors' or recipients' body mass index and clinical outcomes after first single blastocyst transfers-the uterus is the most affected. Fertil Steril 2024; 121:281-290. [PMID: 37549838 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether high body mass index (BMI) in either oocyte donors or recipients is associated with poorer outcomes after the first single blastocyst transfer. DESIGN Retrospective study including 1,394 first blastocyst single embryo transfers (SETs) conducted by 1,394 recipients during oocyte donation cycles with the gametes retrieved from 1,394 women (January 2019-July 2021). Four BMI clusters were defined for both donors and recipients (underweight: <18.5 kg; normal weight: 18.5-24.9 kg; overweight: 25-29.9 kg; and obese: ≥30 kg). SETTING Network of private IVF centers. PATIENTS A total of 1,394 recipients aged 42.4 ± 4.0 and with a BMI of 23.2 ± 3.8 kg/m2, and 1,394 donors aged 26.1 ± 4.2 and with a BMI of 21.9 ± 2.5 kg/m2. INTERVENTION All oocytes were vitrified at 2 egg banks and warmed at 8 in vitro fertilization clinics that were part of the same network. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, blastocyst culture, and either fresh or vitrified-warmed SETs were conducted. Putative confounders were investigated, and the data were adjusted through regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per SET according to donors' and/or recipients' BMI. The main secondary outcome was the miscarriage rate (<22 gestational weeks) per clinical pregnancy. RESULTS The LBR per blastocyst SET showed no significant association with donors' BMI. Regarding recipients' BMI, instead, the multivariate odds ratio was significant in obese vs. normal-weight recipients (0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.91). The miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy was also significantly associated with recipients' obesity, with a multivariate odds ratio of 2.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.51) vs. normal-weight patients. A generalized additive model method was used to represent the relationship between predicted LBR or miscarriage rates and donors' or recipients' BMI; it pictured a scenario where the former outcome moderately but continuously decreases with increasing recipients' BMI to then sharply decline in the BMI range of 25-35 kg/m2. The miscarriage rate, instead, increases almost linearly with respect to both donors' and recipients' increasing BMI. CONCLUSION Obesity mostly affects the uterus, especially because of higher miscarriage rates. Yet, poorer outcomes can be appreciated already with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 in both oocyte donors and recipients. Finer markers of nutritional homeostasis are therefore desirable; recipients should be counseled about poorer expected outcomes in cases of overweight and obesity; and oocyte banks should avoid assigning oocytes from overweight donors to overweight and obese recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Fabozzi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy; IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, B-WOMAN, Rome, Italy; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy.
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Monica Aura
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GINEFIV, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Claudia Livi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, DEMETRA, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Zacà
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, 9.baby, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Borini
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, 9.baby, Bologna, Italy
| | - Erminia Alviggi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Ruesch, Naples, Italy
| | - Benedetta Iussig
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, GENERA Veneto, Marostica, Italy
| | - Maria Hebles
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GINEMED, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | - Laura Rienzi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy; Department of Biomolecular Sciences, the University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiappetta V, Innocenti F, Coticchio G, Ahlström A, Albricci L, Badajoz V, Hebles M, Gallardo M, Benini F, Canosa S, Kumpošt J, Milton K, Montanino Oliva D, Maggiulli R, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D. Discard or not discard, that is the question: an international survey across 117 embryologists on the clinical management of borderline quality blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:1901-1909. [PMID: 37649342 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do embryologists from different European countries agree on embryo disposition decisions ('use' or 'discard') about Day 7 (>144 h post-insemination) and/or low-quality blastocysts (LQB; SUMMARY ANSWER The prevalence of 'discard' answers was 38.7%; nevertheless, embryologists' agreement was overall just fair (Fleiss-k = 0.26). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The utilization of LQBs and adoption of culture beyond 144 h post-insemination is increasing worldwide. Although morphology and morphokinetics are associated with embryo developmental competence, previous studies demonstrated significant interobserver variability among embryologists regarding embryo quality assessment and disposition decisions for borderline quality blastocysts. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION An anonymous survey was run in a large network of IVF centers. A total of 117 embryologists from 6 European countries and 29 IVF centers filled in the survey. Randomly selected anonymous time-lapse videos of 50 Day 7 and/or LQB whole embryo preimplantation development were assessed by the embryologists. The key information on patients/cycles was provided along with each video. All cycles entailed preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Each embryologist specified whether he/she would have discarded or used ('transfer-fresh'/'cryopreserve'/'biopsy') any embryo. Inter-rater agreement was measured with Fleiss-k. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Examiners were asked about their years of experience, center location, average number of cycles and average maternal age, number of colleagues, and use of time-lapse incubators at their centers. All participants were blinded to artificial intelligence (AI) scores generated by two commercially available software packages, chromosomal diagnosis (all blastocysts were tested for aneuploidies), and clinical outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfer. These data were known only by one embryologist not involved in the survey. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Participants were Italian (40%, N = 47), Spanish (24%, N = 28), Portuguese (5%, N = 6), Czech (5%, N = 6), Swedish (23%, N = 27), and Icelandic (3%, N = 3). In total, 2263 (38.7%) 'discard' and 3587 (61.3%) 'use' decisions were recorded. Czech, Portuguese, and Italian embryologists expressed lower 'discard' decision rates (mean ± SD 17 ± 7%, range 8-24%; 23 ± 14% range 4-46%; and 27 ± 18% range 2-72%, respectively), while Spanish gave intermediate (37 ± 16% range 4-66%) and Nordic gave higher (67 ± 11% range 40-90%) rates. The prevalence of 'discard' answers was 38.7% out of 5850 choices (mean per embryologist: 39 ± 23% range 2-90%). Only embryologists' country and IVF group were associated with this rate. Overall agreement among embryologists was fair (Fleiss-k = 0.26). The prevalence of 'discard' responses per embryo was 37 ± 24% (range 2-87%). Only the number of sibling blastocysts influenced this rate (i.e. the larger the cohort, the higher the inclination to 'discard'). No difference was shown for the two scores between euploid and aneuploid borderline quality blastocysts, while the embryologists were, by chance, more prone to 'discard' the latter (28.3 ± 21% range 9-71% versus 41.6 ± 24.8% range 2-87%, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The survey included only private IVF clinics located in Europe. Moreover, a key variable is missing, namely patients' access to care. Indeed, all embryologists involved in the survey were part of the same network of private IVF clinics, while the embryo disposition decisions might be different in a public setting. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Decision-making by European embryologists regarding Day 7 embryos or LQBs is inconsistent with putative clinical consequences, especially in patients with low prognosis. Although the embryologists could make decisions independent from their local regulations, their mindset and clinical background influenced their choices. In the future, AI tools should be trained to assess borderline quality embryos and empowered with cost-effectiveness information to support embryologists' decisions with more objective assessments. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was obtained for this study. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Chiappetta
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Innocenti
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Laura Albricci
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Hebles
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GINEMED, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Jiří Kumpošt
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, FERTICARE, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Katarina Milton
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, CARL VON LINNÈ KLINIKEN, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Diletta Montanino Oliva
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology "Lazzaro Spallanzani", University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, GENERA, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Canosa S, Maggiulli R, Cimadomo D, Innocenti F, Fabozzi G, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, Bongioanni F, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Palmer GA, Nijs M. Cryostorage management of reproductive cells and tissues in ART: status, needs, opportunities and potential new challenges. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 47:103252. [PMID: 37451970 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Among the wide range of procedures performed by clinical embryologists, the cryopreservation of reproductive cells and tissues represents a fundamental task in the daily routine. Indeed, cryopreservation procedures can be considered a subspecialty of medically assisted reproductive technology (ART), having the same relevance as sperm injection or embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. However, although a great deal of care has been devoted to optimizing cryopreservation protocols, the same energy has only recently been spent on developing and implementing strategies for the safe and reliable storage and transport of reproductive specimens. Herein, we have summarized the content of the available guidelines, the risks, the needs and the future perspectives regarding the management of cryopreservation biorepositories used in ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Danilo Cimadomo
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gemma Fabozzi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Flippo M Ubaldi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy; Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino 'Carlo Bo', Urbino, Italy
| | - Giles A Palmer
- International IVF Initiative Inc, New York, NY, USA; Institute of Life, IASO Hospital, Athens, Greece; IVF 2.0 Ltd, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bartolacci A, Borini A, Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Maggiulli R, Lagalla C, Pignataro D, dell'Aquila M, Parodi F, Patria G, Zacà C, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Coticchio G. Humidified atmosphere in a time-lapse embryo culture system does not improve ongoing pregnancy rate: a retrospective propensity score model study derived from 496 first ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023:10.1007/s10815-023-02818-8. [PMID: 37133689 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02818-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether high relative humidity conditions (HC), when using a time-lapse system (TLS) with sequential culture media, are beneficial to embryo culture, improving ongoing pregnancy rates. METHODS We included patients undergoing their first ICSI cycle treatment from April 2021 to May 2022. Patients assigned to dry conditions (DC) or HC were 278 and 218, respectively. We used a GERI TLS, three chambers configured in humidity conditions and three in dry conditions. The effect of HC on ongoing pregnancy rate was assessed by the propensity matched sample, to reduce potential differences between women undergoing either HC or DC and reduce biased estimation of treatment effect. RESULT After adjusting for several confounding variables and applying the propensity score (PS), no significant differences were observed in the rates of normal (2PN) and abnormal (1PN and 3PN) fertilization, blastulation, top-quality blastocysts, frozen blastocysts, ongoing pregnancies, and miscarriages. The 2-cell (t2) and 4-cell (t4) stages and cell divisions between such stages occurred earlier and were more synchronous in the in DC. CONCLUSION These results suggest that HC conditions do not improve the rate of ongoing pregnancy and several embryological outcomes, under the conditions used in this study based on a time-lapse system and sequential culture with day 3 medium change-over.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Urbino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maggiulli R, Cimadomo D, Giancani A, Soscia D, Albricci L, Rubio C, Pascual CG, Sanchez LN, Capalbo A, Simon C, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. IVF culture media refresh in a reduced volume on day4 aimed at improving non-invasive embryo selection does not affect embryo competence: a prospective analysis of 2605 embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
6
|
Casciani V, Cimadomo D, Trio S, Chiappetta V, Innocenti F, Iussig B, Alviggi E, Canosa S, Barnocchi N, Maggiulli R, Berntsen J, Kragh M, Larman M, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. P-189 Association between iDAScore v1.0, senior embryologists’ grading and euploidy in 546 blastocysts obtained during 189 PGT-A cycles. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Is (intelligent data analysis) iDAScore v1.0 associated with euploidy at the blastocyst stage?
Summary answer
iDAScore v1.0 significantly correlated with euploidy (maternal age-adjusted OR:1.3 and AUC:0.72). Euploid blastocysts were ranked highest in ca.70% of the cohorts with both diagnoses.
What is known already
With machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in IVF, several studies have been published mostly aimed at providing standardized and reproducible tools for gamete/embryo assessment and selection. Several of the proposed models might not be generally applicable due to their development on only a single center, small sample size and poor representation of the numerous clinical scenarios. Furthermore, the evidence has been rarely confirmed prospectively and/or in multicenter studies. Lately, the EmbryoScope+ has incorporated the iDAScore v1.0. This algorithm scores the chance of embryo implantation based on the video of blastocyst development and with no need for timing annotations.
Study design, size, duration
Interim analysis of a prospective study. Between April-December 2021, 189 preimplantation-genetic-testing (PGT) cycles (maternal age:38.4±4yr) with ≥1 blastocyst (N = 546 blastocysts, mean±SD:2.9±1.8, range:1-13) were included. We aimed at blindly analyzing the correlation between iDAScore v1.0 and (i) blastocyst quality estimated by senior embryologists, (ii) day of blastocyst full-expansion, (iii) chromosomal constitution diagnosed by NGS on a trophectoderm biopsy, (iv) the blastocyst to prioritize for transfer within cohorts with ≥2 blastocysts.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Undisturbed culture was conducted in the EmbryoScope+. Assisted hatching was not performed and only fully-expanded blastocysts were biopsied. Morphology was assessed by 2 senior embryologists based on Gardner criteria. Average iDAScores were reported for the following groups: (i)excellent (AA)/good (AB,BA)/average (BB,AC,CA)/poor-quality (CC,BC,CB) blastocysts, (ii)day5/6/7 blastocysts, (iii)euploid/aneuploid/complex aneuploid blastocysts. Lastly, we reported how often the highest iDAScore corresponded to the highest ranked morphology (N = 143 cycles with ≥2 blastocysts) and/or euploid blastocysts (N = 79 cycles with both diagnoses).
Main results and the role of chance
In the study period, 546 blastocysts (iDAScore: 6.9±2.0, 2-9.7) were biopsied. The iDAScore was significantly different (Kruskal-Wallis<0.01) across blastocysts graded excellent (N = 256,46.9%; 8.1±1.3, 2.5-9.7), good (N = 97,17.7%; 6.9±1.6, 2.3-9.5), average (N = 75,13.9%; 5.8±1.4, 2.9-8.7) and poor (N = 118,21.5%; 4.8±1.6, 2-8.8). A significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis<0.01) was also found for the day of full-expansion (day5: N = 184,33.9%, 8.8±0.8, 4.3-9.7; day6: N = 324,59.1%, 6.0±1.6, 2.2-9.1; day7: N = 38,6.9%, 4.6±1.6, 2-7.8). Euploid blastocysts (N = 178,32.6%) had a significantly higher (Kruskal-Wallis<0.01) iDAScore (7.5±1.7, 2.4-9.6) than both simple (N = 209,38.3%, 6.7±2.1, 2.1-9.7) and complex aneuploid blastocysts (N = 159,29.1%, 6.3±2.0, 2-9.4). The logistic regression adjusted for maternal age highlighted a multivariate-OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.18-1.45, adjusted-p<0.01 for the association between iDAScore v1.0 and euploidy. The Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) curves outlined similar performance in predicting euploidy among the models encompassing iDAScore v1.0 adjusted for maternal age (AUC: 0.72, 95%CI 0.67-0.76, p < 0.01) or blastocyst quality (defined by senior embryologists) plus day of biopsy also adjusted for maternal age (AUC: 0.73, 95%CI 0.69-0.78, p < 0.01). iDAScore v1.0 and embryologists ranked the same blastocyst highest in 123 of 143 cycles with ≥2 blastocysts (86%). The highest ranked blastocyst according to iDAScore was a euploid blastocyst in 54 of the 79 cycles (68%) containing both euploid and aneuploid blastocysts.
Limitations, reasons for caution
The main purpose of iDAScore v1.0, for which the algorithm was trained, is implantation prediction of untested blastocysts. Thus, once the sample size of this blinded prospective study will be large enough, we will also examine the association between iDAScore v1.0 and the implantation of euploid blastocysts.
Wider implications of the findings
The similar predictivity on euploidy reported between subjective senior embryologists’ grading and objective AI-powered iDAscores is promising in view of IVF automation and standardization. This is especially relevant since iDAScore v1.0 has not been trained yet to specifically predict euploidy, and its future versions could be fine-tuned accordingly.
Trial registration number
Not Applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Casciani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - S Trio
- GeneraLife Milan, GeneraLife IVF , Milan, Italy
| | - V Chiappetta
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - F Innocenti
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - B Iussig
- Genera Veneto, GeneraLife IVF , Marostica, Italy
| | - E Alviggi
- Clinica Ruesch, GeneraLife IVF , Naples, Italy
| | - S Canosa
- Livet, GeneraLife IVF , Turin, Italy
| | - N Barnocchi
- Genera Umbria, GeneraLife IVF , Umbertide, Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - J Berntsen
- Vitrolife, Vitrolife A/S , Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M.F Kragh
- Vitrolife, Vitrolife A/S , Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M Larman
- Vitrolife, Vitrolife Sweden AB , Göteborg, Sweden
| | - F.M Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maggiulli R, Cimadomo D, Innocenti F, Soscia D, Giancani A, Canosa S, Albricci L, Fabozzi G, Stoppa M, Sanges F, Vereczkey A, Holte J, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. P-773 Assessment of the putative impact of culture strategies, oocyte/embryo manipulations, and operators: a retrospective analysis of 3705 blastocyst culture cycles and 2604 single blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Do the culture strategies, oocyte/embryo manipulations, and operators impact blastulation-rates per cohort of metaphase-II oocytes (BR per MII-oocytes) and/or live-birth-rates per single-embryo-transfer (LBR per SET)?
Summary answer
Undisturbed culture improved the BR per MII-oocytes, while culture drop volumes ≥80ml in the well-of-the-well system were associated with increased LBR per untested/euploid blastocyst SET.
What is known already
IVF lab performance is critical to achieve success in IVF. Yet, while a consensus exists on the main key-performance-indicators (KPIs), namely BR and LBR, and their inherent benchmark values, the strategies to fulfil them are still poorly standardized. The plasticity of human embryos along with the disparities in the patient populations might mask even largely different outcomes across clinics. Therefore, clear guidelines shall outline which procedures to standardize and carefully monitor in IVF laboratories. Here we investigated different embryo culture strategies, manipulations, and operators for their effect on BR and LBR per SET, adjusting the results for all main confounders.
Study design, size, duration
Retrospective analysis of 3705 cycles with ≥1 MII-oocyte and 2604 SETs (January2019-March2021). BR per MII-oocytes and LBR per SET were the main outcomes. Embryo-twinning was also assessed. The putative impact of culture strategies, manipulations, and operators’ expertise (0-5yr,6-11yr or > 12yr) was determined via regression analyses adjusted for possible confounders (autologous/donated oocytes, age, primary/secondary infertility and duration, sperm factor; for SET: also endometrial preparation, age at transfer, number of consecutive transfer, untested/euploid blastocyst, quality, and day).
Participants/materials, setting, methods
In donation cycles, only vitrified oocytes were used. In Preimplantation-Genetic-Testing (PGT) cycles, no assisted-hatching was performed and only euploid non-mosaic vitrified-warmed blastocysts were transferred. The culture strategies assessed were undisturbed (Embryoscope, Geri and Embryoscope-plus)/disturbed (KSystems), volume and approach (drops ≤30ml with single-culture or ≥ 80ml with well-of-the-well approaches), humidified/non-humidified atmosphere and media refreshed/not-refreshed. The manipulations assessed were oocyte/blastocyst vitrification (performed/not-performed), oocyte retrieval and denudation performed with oil overlay (yes/not), laser-assisted artificial-shrinkage (performed/not-performed), trophectoderm biopsy (performed/not-performed).
Main results and the role of chance
The only confounders on BR per MII-oocytes (overall:39.1±26.6%) were sperm factor and oocyte age. The linear regressions showed benefits for humidified atmosphere (unstandardized B-coefficient:+2.9%, p = 0.01), manipulations with oil overlay (+3.9%, p = 0.03) and drops≥80ml with a well-of-the-well approach (+4.3%, p < 0.01). However, only the positive effect of undisturbed incubators was significant when adjusting for confounders [41.7±27.8% (N = 1440 cycles) versus 37.5±25.7% in a disturbed incubator (N = 2265 cycles); unstandardized B-coefficient:+5.6%, 95%CI +3.9% to + 7.3%, standardized beta-coefficient:-0.103,p<0.01].
The main confounders on LBR per SET (overall: N = 1044/2604, 40.1%) were oocyte age, number of consecutive transfer, blastocyst chromosomal status (untested/euploid), quality and day. The univariate logistic regressions showed a benefit for undisturbed incubators (OR:1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.5, p < 0.01), humidified atmosphere (OR:1.4, 95%CI 1.1-1.7, p < 0.01) and media refresh (OR:1.3, 95% 1.01-1.8, p = 0.05). However, only the use of drops ≥80ml with a well-of-the-well approach rather than drops ≤30ml with a single-culture approach involved an improvement when adjusting for confounders (untested SETs: N = 71/171, 41.5% versus N = 434/1284, 33.8%; euploid SETs: N = 170/316, 53.8% versus N = 369/833, 44.3%; multivariate-OR:1.33, 95%CI 1.12-1.58, adjusted p-value<0.01). This result was confirmed in a sub-analysis across only first patients’ SETs.
Lastly, no feature under investigation was associated with embryo-twinning (overall: N = 23/1243, 1.9% and N = 14/1044, 1.3% per pregnancy and delivery, respectively).
Limitations, reasons for caution
Retrospective single center study. Only ICSI cycles and continuous culture media were assessed. Cleavage stage SETs were excluded. All operators had at least 3yr of experience. Perinatal and gestational outcomes were not evaluated.
Wider implications of the findings
Real-life data adjusted for confounders may unveil fluctuations in critical KPIs mainly imputable to culture strategies. An impact seldom derives from oocyte/embryo manipulations if experienced operators adopt validated protocols. An accurate interpretation of these evidence shall lead to properly designed studies with problem-solving/progress-building purposes, and guidelines to standardize culture practices.
Trial registration number
Not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - F Innocenti
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - D Soscia
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - A Giancani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - S Canosa
- Livet, GeneraLife IVF , Turin, Italy
| | - L Albricci
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - G Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - M Stoppa
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - F Sanges
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - A Vereczkey
- Versys Clinics, Human Reproduction Institute , Budapest, Hungary
| | - J Holte
- Carl von Linnè clinic, GeneraLife IVF , Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - F.M Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fabozzi G, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Badajoz V, Aura Masip M, Bongioanni F, Benini F, Degl'Innocenti A, Buffo L, Hebles Duvison M, Sànchez Martìn F, Sànchez Martìn P, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Llàcer J. P-389 Elevated BMI in oocyte donors or recipients is associated with a higher risk of miscarriage after blastocyst transfer: a multicenter analysis of 1544 procedures. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac107.366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Is an elevated BMI in either oocyte donors or recipients associated with a higher risk of miscarriage after blastocyst transfer?
Summary answer
Overweight in oocyte donors and/or obesity in recipients are associated with a 2X-higher risk of miscarriage in egg donation cycles.
What is known already
Several basic-science, clinical and epidemiological studies revealed an association between BMI and infertility, suggesting a J-shaped relationship: both underweight and especially overweight/obese women can suffer from reproductive impairments. In particular, overweight-obese women are more prone to suffer from a miscarriage even when euploid blastocysts are transferred. Yet, it is still unclear whether this is the consequence of an altered oocyte (and then embryonic) competence and/or an impaired endometrial receptivity. In this context, oocyte donation cycles represent the ideal clinical setting to shed some light on an issue with numerous social, clinical, and logistic implications.
Study design, size, duration
Retrospective study including 1544 blastocyst single embryo transfers (SETs) conducted in oocyte donation cycles (Jan2019-May2021). All oocytes were vitrified at 2 egg banks in Spain and warmed at 8 clinics part of the same network. The primary outcome was the miscarriage rate (<22nd gestational weeks) per clinical pregnancy according to donors’ and/or recipients’ BMI. Four BMI clusters were defined (underweight: <18.5; normal-weight: 18.5-24.9; over-weight: 25-30; obese: >30).
Participants/materials, setting, methods
66.1%,4.9%,20.3% and 8.7% of SETs were conducted in normal-weight, underweight, overweight, and obese recipients. 81.4%,4.5% and 14.1% of SETs with oocytes derived from normal-weight, underweight, and overweight donors. The putative confounders investigated were egg bank, IVF center, fresh/vitrified-warmed SET, blastocyst quality/day, recipient/donor age, endometrial preparation protocol, number of consecutive SET. Before SET, we requested blood test for infections and TORCH, thyroid function, coagulation and immunological assessment, cardiological, gynecologic and breast evaluation.
Main results and the role of chance
Overweight-obese recipients were slightly older (43.0±4.0yr) than normal-weight ones (42.2±3.8yr; p < 0.01). Similarly, overweight donors were slightly older (27.5±4.5yr) than normal-weight ones (26.4±4.3yr; p < 0.01). Therefore, all outcomes were adjusted for recipients’/donors’ age. The overall positive pregnancy rate per blastocyst SET and biochemical pregnancy loss rate were 51.8% and 12.6%. No association was reported between either recipients’ or donors’ BMI and both these secondary outcomes. Conversely, higher recipients’ and donors’ BMI were significantly associated with a higher risk of miscarriage after blastocyst SET (multivariate-OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.1, adjusted-p=0.05; multivariate-OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.04-1.2, adjusted-p<0.01). The most significant differences were reported for obese versus normal-weight recipients (N = 18/64,28.1% versus N = 73/448,16.3%; p = 0.03, power=60%; multivariate-OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.01-3.4, adjusted-p=0.05) and for overweight versus normo-weight donors (N = 31/111,27.9% versus N = 94/561,16.8%; p < 0.01, power=73%; multivariate-OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.16-3.0, adjusted-p=0.01). In the 14 clinical pregnancies where the oocytes derived from overweight donors and the blastocysts were transferred to obese women the miscarriage rate was 50%; the same outcome in normal-weight recipients using oocytes from normal-weight donors was 15% (N = 55/366; p < 0.01, power=85%; OR 5.6, 95%CI 1.8-16.8, p < 0.01). The data were similar across both egg banks and all IVF centers. All other parameters assessed were not associated with the primary outcome under investigation.
Limitations, reasons for caution
The study is retrospective, and the sample size in each sub-group shall be increased. Moreover, BMI is a gross marker of an individual’s metabolic status. Future studies on more accurate markers like percentage and localization of adipose tissue assessed through techniques like bioelectrical impedance analyses are desirable.
Wider implications of the findings
Both oocyte competence and endometrial receptivity might be impaired from unbalanced nutritional intakes. More studies on this topic are certainly required. Whenever possible, nutritional/lifestyle adjustments should be encouraged in obese patients because of their higher risk of miscarriage, and a BMI limit should be considered also when recruiting egg donors.
Trial registration number
Not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - V Badajoz
- Ginefiv, GeneraLife IVF , Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - F Benini
- Demetra, GeneraLife IVF , Florence, Italy
| | | | - L Buffo
- Genera Veneto, GeneraLife IVF , Marostica, Italy
| | | | | | | | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - F.M Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - J Llàcer
- Ginefiv, GeneraLife IVF , Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cimadomo D, Marconetto A, Innocenti F, Trio S, Chiappetta V, Soscia D, Albricci L, Dovere L, Giancani A, Maggiulli R, Erlich I, Ben-Meir A, Har-Vardi I, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. O-101 Elucidation of blastocyst collapse and its consequences: a comprehensive artificial intelligence-powered analysis of 1943 embryos from 643 couples. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac105.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
What are the causes and consequences of blastocyst collapse?
Summary answer
∼50% of blastocysts collapsed, especially if they are aneuploid and/or morphologically-poor. Yet, no impact on the live-birth-rate (LBR) per vitrified-warmed euploid single-embryo-transfer (SET) was reported.
What is known already
Time-lapse-microscopy (TLM) is a powerful tool to describe the peculiar dynamics of preimplantation development. Lately, artificial intelligence (AI) has been also implemented to automatize and standardize such description. Here, we adopted AI to comprehensively portray blastocyst collapse, namely the phenomenon of embryo contraction with an efflux of blastocoel fluid and the detachment of the trophectoderm (TE) from the Zona Pellucida (ZP). Although, the causes of this event are still undetermined, small blastocyst contractions have been reported beneficial for the hatching process, while a full collapse has been associated with lower competence.
Study design, size, duration
Observational study including 1943 blastocysts from 643 couples cultured in the Embryoscope between January-2013 and December-2020. TE biopsy without day3 ZP drilling and comprehensive-chromosome-testing were performed. The Fairtility® software automatically registered: (i)time of starting-blastulation (tSB), (ii)starting and ending time of each collapse (tSC and tEC), (iii)blastocysts’ areas, (iv)shrinkage% [(area at SC – area at EC)/area at SC)], (v)embryo:ZP ratio at EC (area of the collapsed embryo/area of the ZP), and (vi)time of biopsy (t-biopsy).
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Blastocyst quality was defined according to Istanbul Consensus (11, excellent; 12-21, good; 22-13-31, average; 33-23-32, poor) and with the Fairtility implantation score (IS) as well, i.e., a continuous variable from 0 to 1 generated by the KID+ software based on the TLM videos of preimplantation development. The main outcome was the LBR per euploid SET adjusted for confounders through logistic regressions. All couple and embryo features were also investigated for their association with blastocyst collapse.
Main results and the role of chance
47.3% of the blastocysts collapsed 1- to 9-times (interval between collapses: 4-8hr), and 73% of the couples had ≥1 collapsed blastocyst (1.8±1.1, range:1-8). No couple feature, though, was associated with blastocyst collapse. The longest collapses lasted 1.5±1.1 (0.13-5.1)hr, while the largest shrinkage% and embryo:ZP ratio at EC were 35±14% (10-78%) and 81±9% (33-90%), respectively. In ∼50-60% of collapses a 20-40% blastocyst volume reduction was registered, 40-60% or 20-40% in ∼15-30%, 60-80% in 0-4%. In case of multiple collapses, the first three involved smaller shrinkages. Blastocysts undergoing ≥1 collapse showed similar tSB as not-collapsing blastocysts, but progressively longer tEB and t-biopsy. The earlier the first event, the more the consecutive collapses. Notably, the poorer the morphology, the higher the risk (excellent, good, average, and poor not-collapsing blastocysts were 64%,50%,44% and 37%), number (e.g.,≥4 collapses were 0.4%,2%,4% and 8%) and duration (1.2±1.0,1.4±1.0,1.6±1.1 and 1.9±1.3hr) of blastocyst collapse. Collapsing blastocysts were significantly less euploid than non-collapsing (35% vs 47%; multivariate-OR:0.75,95%CI 0.6-0.92,p<0.01); conversely, their LBR per euploid SET (39% vs 46%) and miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy (17% vs 11%), were not significantly different (adjusted-OR:1.0,95%CI 0.69-1.48,p=0.96 and adjusted-OR:1.65,95%CI 0.79-3.42,p=0.18, respectively). All data were confirmed also by defining blastocyst quality through the Fairtility IS.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Gestational and perinatal outcomes were not assessed. Other culture strategies and media shall be assessed for their association with blastocyst collapse. Perhaps, future studies from other groups and with a larger sample size might unveil a significant impact on the clinical outcomes.
Wider implications of the findings
Collapse is common and delays blastocyst full-expansion. Moreover, poor morphology and aneuploidies involve a higher risk of collapse(s); however, no impact was reported on the clinical outcomes after euploid SET. AI appears to increase the throughput of the analysis, but additional data are required to research the causes of collapse.
Trial registration number
Not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - A Marconetto
- National University of Córdoba, University Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Córdoba , Argentina
| | - F Innocenti
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - S Trio
- GeneraLife Milan, GeneraLife IVF, Milan , Italy
| | - V Chiappetta
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - D Soscia
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - L Albricci
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - L Dovere
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - A Giancani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - I Erlich
- Fairtility Ltd., Fairtility, Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - A Ben-Meir
- Fairtility Ltd., Fairtility, Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - I Har-Vardi
- Fairtility Ltd., Fairtility, Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - F.M Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Roma , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Innocenti F, Cimadomo D, Soscia D, Casciani V, Trio S, Chiappetta V, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Fabozzi G, Erlich I, Ben-Meir A, Har-Vardi I, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. O-121 Uncovering the value of day 7 blastocysts using artificial intelligence on time lapse videos. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac105.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Which is the clinical value of day 7 blastocysts?
Summary answer
Ending embryo culture at 144 hours-post-insemination (hpi) would involve7.3%- and 4.4%-relative reductions in the patients obtaining euploid blastocysts and live birth(s)(LBs), respectively.
What is known already
Many studies showed that day 7 blastocysts are clinically valuable although less euploid and less competent than faster growing embryos. Nevertheless, a large variability exists in: (i) the definition of “day 7”; (ii) the criteria to culture embryos to day 7; (iii)the clinical setting; (iv) the local regulation; and/or (v) the culture strategies and incubators. Here,we aimed at ironing out these differences and portray day 7 blastocysts with the lowest possible risk of bias. To this end, we have also adopted an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software to automatize developmental timings annotations and standardize embryo morphological assessment.
Study design, size, duration
Observational study including 1966 blastocysts obtained from 681 patients cultured in a time lapse incubator between January 2013 and December 2020 at a private Italian IVF center.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Trophectoderm biopsy without hatching and comprehensive-chromosome-testing were performed. Blastocysts were clustered in six groups based on the time-of-biopsy every 12hr from <120hpi (control) to > 168hpi. Blastocyst quality, time-of-expanding-blastocyst (tEB) and duration of expansion were annotated through AI and confirmed manually. The main outcomes were euploidy-rate and LB-rate (LBR) per transfer. Lastly, patients obtaining (euploid) blastocysts, LBs, and supernumerary blastocysts, were reported based on a hypothetical 144hpi cut-off, and all relative reductions calculated.
Main results and the role of chance
14.6% of the blastocysts reached full expansionbeyond 144hpi (5.9% between 144-156hpi, 7.9% between 156-168hpi, and 0.8% >168hpi). Slower blastocysts were of a worse quality based on the evaluation of both embryologists and AI. Both longer tEB and a longer duration of expansion concurred to day7 development, quite independently of embryo quality. The lower euploidy rate among day7 blastocysts is due to their worse morphology and more advanced oocyte age, rather than to a slower development per se. Conversely, the lower LBR was significant even after adjusting for confounders, with a first relevant decrease for blastocysts biopsied in the range 132-144hpi (N = 76/208, 36.5% versus N = 114/215, 53.0% in the control, multivariate-OR: 0.61, 95%CI 0.40-0.92, adjusted-p=0.02), and a second step for blastocysts biopsied in the range 156-168hpi (N = 3/21, 14.3%, multivariate-OR:0.24, 95%CI 0.07-0.88, adjusted-p=0.03). Nevertheless, when the cut-off was set at 144hpi, no significant difference was reported. In this patient population, ending embryo culture at 144hpi would have caused 10.6%-, 7.3%-, 4.4%-, 13.7%-, and 5.2%-relative reductions in the number ofpatients obtaining blastocysts, euploid blastocysts, LBs, supernumerary blastocysts without a LB and after a LB, respectively.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Gestational and perinatal outcomes were not assessed, and a cost-effectiveness analysis was not performed. We encourage the production of these data in other clinical settings and regulatory contexts.
Wider implications of the findings
Day7 culture shall be supported following a careful case-by-case evaluation. Patients shall be aware of their lower competence, yet day7 blastocysts are valuable for poor-prognosis couples, couples less compliant towards other attempts in case of failures, and couples wishing for second children. AI may improve the generalizability of these evidence.
Trial registration number
Not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Innocenti
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - D Soscia
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - V Casciani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - S Trio
- GeneraLife Milan, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - V Chiappetta
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - L Albricci
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - G Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - I Erlich
- Fairtility Ltd ., Fairtility, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - A Ben-Meir
- Fairtility Ltd ., Fairtility, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - I Har-Vardi
- Fairtility Ltd ., Fairtility, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - A Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - F.M Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Canosa S, Cimadomo D, Conforti A, Maggiulli R, Giancani A, Tallarita A, Golia F, Fabozzi G, Vaiarelli A, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, Bongioanni F, Alviggi C, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. The effect of extended cryo-storage following vitrification on embryo competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:873-882. [PMID: 35119549 PMCID: PMC9050987 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02405-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Few studies explored whether prolonged cryo-storage after vitrification affects embryo competence and perinatal outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at highlighting any putative impact of cryo-storage duration on cryo-survival, miscarriage, live birth and major malformations. METHODS A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Embase databases up to June 2021. Data were combined to obtain a pooled OR, and meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Out of 1,389 screened abstracts, 22 papers were assessed for eligibility, and 5 studies were included (N = 18,047 embryos). Prolonged cryo-storage was defined as > 12 months (N = 3389 embryos). Subgroup analysis was performed for untested vitrified cleavage stage embryos (N = 1739 embryos) and for untested and euploid vitrified blastocysts (N = 13,596 and 2712 embryos, respectively). RESULTS Survival rate, miscarriage, live birth and major malformation rates were all similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION These data further support the safety of long-term cryo-storage of human embryos beyond 12 months. This is reassuring for good prognosis patients with surplus embryos, couples seeking a second child from supernumerary embryos and women postponing the transfer for clinical or personal reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Canosa
- Livet, GeneraLife IVF, Turin, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - A Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy.
| | - A Giancani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - A Tallarita
- Genera Veneto, GeneraLife IVF, Marostica, Italy
| | - F Golia
- Clinica Ruesch, GeneraLife IVF, Naples, Italy
| | - G Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - A Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - C Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - F M Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Dovere L, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, Innocenti F, Soscia D, Giancani A, Vaiarelli A, Guido M, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer are independent of cryo-storage duration. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 44:221-227. [PMID: 34862135 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION The study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of cryo-storage duration on clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer. DESIGN This was an observational study including 2688 vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers that was conducted at a private IVF centre between May 2013 and March 2020. It included a total of 1884 women (age 38 ± 3 years) undergoing at least one transfer after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. The euploid blastocysts transferred were clustered into seven groups according to the cryo-storage duration between vitrification and warming: ≤60 days (n = 646; control group), 61-90 days (n = 599), 91-180 days (n = 679), 181-360 days (n = 405), 361-720 days (n = 144), 721-1080 days (n = 118) and >1080 days (n = 97). The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per transfer. The secondary outcomes were miscarriage rate, obstetric and perinatal issues. The data were adjusted for confounders through logistic or linear regressions. RESULTS A significantly lower LBR was reported for transfers performed within 91-180 days (n = 291/679, 42.9%; P = 0.017), 181-360 days (n = 169/405, 41.7%; P = 0.016) and 361-720 days (n = 57/144, 39.6%; P = 0.034) versus ≤60 days (n = 319/646, 49.4%). However, this was mainly due to top-quality embryos being transferred first when more euploid blastocysts were available, thereby leaving lower quality ones for subsequent procedures. Indeed, the multivariate odds ratios adjusted for confounders showed similar results across all cryo-storage duration clusters. No difference was reported also for all secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Cryo-storage duration even beyond 3 years from blastocyst vitrification does not affect clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa Dovere
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Daria Soscia
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Maurizio Guido
- MeSVA Department, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Laura Rienzi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cimadomo D, Sosa Fernandez L, Soscia D, Fabozzi G, Benini F, Cesana A, Dal Canto MB, Maggiulli R, Muzzì S, Scarica C, Rienzi L, De Santis L. Inter-centre reliability in embryo grading across several IVF clinics is limited: implications for embryo selection. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 44:39-48. [PMID: 34819249 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What is the intra- and inter-centre reliability in embryo grading performed according to the Istanbul Consensus across several IVF clinics? DESIGN Forty Day 3 embryos and 40 blastocysts were photographed on three focal planes. Senior and junior embryologists from 65 clinics were invited to grade them according to the Istanbul Consensus (Study Phase I). All participants then attended interactive training where a panel of experts graded the same embryos (Study Phase II). Finally, a second set of pictures was sent to both embryologists and experts for a blinded evaluation (Study Phase III). Intra-centre reliability was reported for Study Phase I as Cohen's kappa between senior and junior embryologists; inter-centre reliability was instead calculated between senior/junior embryologists and experts in Study Phase I versus III to outline improvements after training (i.e. upgrade of Cohen's kappa category according to Landis and Koch). RESULTS Thirty-six embryologists from 18 centres participated (28% participation rate). The intra-centre reliability was (i) substantial (0.63) for blastomere symmetry (range -0.02 to 1.0), (ii) substantial (0.72) for fragmentation (range 0.29-1.0), (iii) substantial (0.66) for blastocyst expansion (range 0.19-1.0), (iv) moderate (0.59) for inner cell mass quality (range 0.07-0.92), (v) moderate (0.56) for trophectoderm quality (range 0.01-0.97). The inter-centre reliability showed an overall improvement from Study Phase I to III, from fair (0.21-0.4) to moderate (0.41-0.6) for all parameters under analysis, except for blastomere fragmentation among senior embryologists, which was already moderate before training. CONCLUSIONS Intra-centre reliability was generally moderate/substantial, while inter-centre reliability was just fair. The interactive training improved it to moderate, hence this workflow was deemed helpful. The establishment of external quality assessment services (e.g. UK NEQAS) and the avant-garde of artificial intelligence might further improve the reliability of this key practice for embryo selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daria Soscia
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Amalia Cesana
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Catello Scarica
- European Hospital, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia De Santis
- Centro Scienze Natalità, Dept Ob/Gyn, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maggiulli R, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Giancani A, Tacconi L, Fabozzi G, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives. J Vis Exp 2021. [PMID: 34605809 DOI: 10.3791/61963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Preserving female fertility is crucial in a multifunctional healthcare system that takes care of patients' future quality of life. Oocyte cryopreservation is recognized by several international scientific societies as the gold standard for fertility preservation in postpubertal women, for both medical and non-medical indications. The main medical indications are oncologic diseases, gynecologic diseases such as severe endometriosis, systemic diseases compromising the ovarian reserve, and genetic conditions involving premature menopause. This paper describes the whole clinical and laboratory work-up of a fertility preservation treatment by outlining recommendations for objective and evidence-based counseling. Furthermore, it focuses on the effectiveness of the procedure and describes the most appropriate strategies to fully exploit the ovarian reserve and maximize the number of oocytes retrieved in the shortest possible time. The evaluation of the ovarian reserve, the definition of an ideal stimulation protocol, as well as oocyte retrieval, denudation, and vitrification procedures have been detailed along with approaches to maximize their efficacy, efficiency, and safety.
Collapse
|
15
|
Maggiulli R, Cimadomo D, Dovere L, Innocenti F, Albricci L, Soscia D, Giancani A, Sanges F, Amendola MG, Tacconi L, Nastri G, Morgante V, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. P–783 Clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer are independent of cryo-storage duration. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Is cryo-storage duration associated with the outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfer?
Summary answer
Lower live-birth-rates from blastocysts cryo-stored for periods longer than 3-months are mostly imputable to the worse quality of the embryos being warmed across sequential transfers.
What is known already
Blastocyst vitrification is crucial in modern IVF. Given its widespread application, a constant comprehensive monitoring of its effect on reproductive outcomes is pivotal. For instance, the effect of cryo-storage duration on embryo implantation potential, gestational and perinatal outcomes is object of a still ongoing investigation. The evidence in this regard are contrasting especially with regard to similar or decreased live birth rates among blastocysts subject to long-term cryo-storage. When investigating the neonatal outcomes, instead, no impact of blastocyst cryo-storage duration has ever been reported to date. Yet, data on euploid blastocysts and adjusted for quality and full-blastulation day are needed.
Study design, size, duration
Retrospective observational study. We included 2688 vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers. The primary outcome was the live-birth-rates (LBR) according to cryo-storage duration clustered as ≤ 60, 61–90, 91–180, 181–360, 361–720, 721–1080 and >1080-days. The secondary outcomes were the miscarriage rate, the rates of gestational and perinatal issues among the deliveries, and the mean gestational age and birthweight among the babies born. All data were adjusted for confounders through linear or logistic regression analyses. Participants/materials, setting, methods: We included all vitrified-warmed transfers (range:1–8) conducted between May–2013 and March–2020 by 1884 patients (age:38±3yr) undergoing one blastocyst stage PGT-A cycle and obtaining ≥1 euploid embryo at our private clinic. Among putative confounders, only the number of sequential transfer from the same patient, blastocyst quality (Gardner’s scheme) and full-blastulation day (5–7) significantly associated with the LBR through univariate regressions. No association was reported for sperm factor, maternal age, incubator, and culture media.
Main results and the role of chance
The LBR of euploid blastocysts cryo-stored for ≤60-days was 49.4% (N = 319/646) versus 48.7% (N = 292/599; OR:0.98,95%CI:0.78–1.21,p=0.82) between 61–90-days, 42.9% (N = 291/679; OR:0.77,95%CI:0.62–0.96,p=0.02) between 91–180-days, 41.7% (N = 169/405; OR:0.73,95%CI:0.57–0.94,p=0.02) between 181–360-days, 34.7% (N = 50/144; OR:0.55,95%CI:0.37–0.79,p<0.01) between 361–720-days, 53.4% (N = 63/118; OR:1.17,95%CI:0.79–1.74,p=0.42) between 721–1080-days, and 50.5% (N = 49/97; OR:1.05,95%CI:0.68–1.60,p=0.83) for >1080-days. However, when these data were adjusted for blastocyst quality and full-blastulation day, all the multivariate-OR were not-significant. Indeed, the longer the cryo-storage period the worse the quality of the euploid blastocysts transferred (e.g. AA-blastocysts were 74% among embryos cryo-stored for ≤90-days, but always <70% for embryos cryo-stored for longer periods, p < 0.01; similarly, day5-blastocysts were ∼50% among embryos cryo-stored for ≤90-days, but always <50% for embryos cryo-stored for longer periods, p = 0.02). The miscarriage-rate (overall 14%, ranging 7–18%) was not associated with cryo-storage duration already from univariate regressions. Also the gestational (overall 6%, ranging 0–8%) and perinatal issues rates (overall 3%, ranging 0–5%) were not associated with cryo-storage duration already from the univariate regressions. Neither the gestational age nor the birthweight showed significant associations with cryo-storage duration, as confirmed by linear regressions. In fact the rate of newborns whose weight was normal-for-gestational-age was similar across all cryo-storage duration groups (overall 81%, ranging 80–83%).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The prevalence of first transfers decreases from ≥95% for procedures conducted ≤90-days from vitrification to 71%, 39%, 22% and 4% for procedures conducted between 91–180, 181–360, 361–720 and >720-days, respectively. However, also the sequential number of transfer was not associated with the LBR when adjusted for blastocyst-quality and full-blastulation day.
Wider implications of the findings: Cryo-storage by vitrification is confirmed safe in the hands of experienced operators, and its duration does not impact any outcome. This information is valuable for freeze-all cycles, but also for women cryo-preserving surplus embryos for second pregnancies; in this regard, 6.8% of the patients in this study delivered ≥2 LBs.
Trial registration number
Not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Dovere
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F Innocenti
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Albricci
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - D Soscia
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - A Giancani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F Sanges
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - M G Amendola
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Tacconi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - G Nastri
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - V Morgante
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - A Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sos. Fernandez LV, Cimadomo D, Soscia D, Fabozzi G, Muzzì S, Benini F, Maggiulli R, Da. Canto MB, Cesana A, Scarica C, Rienzi L, Santis LD. P–752 Embryo morphological grading across several IVF centers is not consistent but an interactive training is useful to improve its consistency. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Are the embryologists across several IVF clinics concordant when evaluating embryo morphology?
Summary answer
Embryo morphological grading is sufficiently consistent among embryologists from the same center, while an interactive training was essential to improve its accuracy across several clinics.
What is known already
Embryo morphology, mostly at the blastocyst stage, is the strongest non-invasive embryological feature that associates with implantation potential. This association is confirmed also when euploid blastocysts are transferred. At present, several embryo grading schemes exist but is still unclear which is the most effective among them. Moreover, many IVF clinics adopt internal embryo grading scores, further limiting the transferability of this crucial prognostic information across different laboratories. With the aim of assessing the level of concordance in embryo grading within and between IVF clinics, the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR) conceived this study.
Study design, size, duration
We photographed 40 cleavage-stage and 40 blastocyst-stage embryos (3 focal-planes=240 photos). Two embryologists (senior and junior) from 65 Italian IVF clinics were invited to grade them. Their evaluations were blindly collected as Phase-I (January2020-March2020). Phase-II consisted of an interactive-training on Google-Classroom during which 6 selected experts found a Consensus on the morphological evaluation of the 80 embryos (April2020). As Phase III (May2020-July2020), a second set of 240 pictures was sent to senior participants and experts.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Eighteen centers agreed to participate, and 36 embryologists were included. The embryo grading scheme adopted was the Alpha-ESHRE Istanbul Consensus (parameters: cleavage-stage blastomeres’ symmetry and fragmentation, blastocyst’s expansion, inner-cell-mass and trophectoderm quality), conventionally used in 50% of the centers (N = 9/18). The concordance within (junior versus senior) and between (senior versus experts) centers was calculated through the Cohen’s-k. The concordance between centers was compared before and after the interactive training on the two sets of pictures.
Main results and the role of chance
The centers and embryologists included were representative of the Italian IVF scenario: oocyte-retrievals per year:711±636,range100–2200; cycles with cleavage-stage embryo-transfer:322±339,0–1300; cycles with blastocyst-stage embryo-transfer:390±403,0–1100; operators per center:5.6±4.0,2–13; senior embryologists’ experience:14.8±7.4yr,7–30; junior embryologists’ experience:2.7±0.6yr,1–3. The intra-center concordance was (i)for blastomeres’ symmetry 82±15% (38–100%), k 0.59±0.27 (0.02–1), (ii)for blastomeres’ fragmentation 88±9% (65–100%), k 0.71±0.2 (0.29–1), (iii)for blastocysts’ expansion 80±16% (48–100%), k 0.66±0.27 (0.19–1), (iv)for inner-cell-mass quality 73±16% (35–95%), k 0.58±0.24 (0.07–0.92), (v)for trophectoderm quality 71±19% (38–95%), k 0.54±0.32 (0.01–0.97). Linear regressions showed no association of centers’ and embryologists’ characteristics with all k-values.
Among clinics with the highest mean number of cycles per year and intra-center concordance, we selected 6 experts for the interactive-training. We then calculated the inter-center concordance as the agreement rate between senior embryologists and the experts for phase-I and phase-III: (i)for blastomeres’ symmetry 67±15% (30–85%) and 73±17% (15–90%;Wilcoxon-signed-ranks-test=0.06), k 0.33±0.22 (–0.29–0.58) and 0.42±0.33 (–0.56–0.77); (ii)for blastomeres’ fragmentation 81±17% (23–95%) and 83±14% (50–95%;Wilcoxon-signed-ranks-test=0.8), k 0.54±0.22 (–0.05–0.84) and 0.55±0.22 (0.17–0.81); (iii)for blastocysts’ expansion 59±16% (35–85%) and 67±17% (23–90%;Wilcoxon-signed-ranks-test=0.04), k 0.35±0.20 (0.06–0.73) and 0.44±0.22 (–0.10–0.7); (iv)for inner-cell-mass quality 60±14% (33–80%) and 69±11% (48–85%;Wilcoxon-signed-ranks-test=0.02), k 0.40±0.20 (0.01–0.69) and 0.51±0.18 (0.18–0.77); (v)for trophectoderm quality 55±12% (23–70%) and 63±10% 48–78%;Wilcoxon-signed-ranks-test<0.01), k 0.29±0.15 (–0.08–0.52) and 0.42±0.15 (0.21–0.66).
Limitations, reasons for caution
Only 28% (N = 18/65) of the Italian IVF centers invited to participate responded to the survey. The conventional adoption of grading schemes other than Istanbul-Consensus by 50% of the embryologists might have biased their evaluation. The experts were not fully-concordant in grading 13.8% of the embryos (N = 22/160), which required active discussions.
Wider implications of the findings: Blastocyst-grading concordance was significantly improved after the training phase. Therefore, interactive consensus meetings and training platforms are keenly needed to standardize this practice across the centers. The “avant-garde” of artificial intelligence applied to embryo image analysis might help overcoming this issue in the future.
Trial registration number
N.A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D Cimadomo
- GeneraLife IVF- Clinica Valle Giulia, Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - D Soscia
- GeneraLife IVF- Clinica Valle Giulia, Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - G Fabozzi
- GeneraLife IVF- Clinica Valle Giulia, Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - S Muzzì
- ICSI ROMA- Clinica Villa Mafalda, Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - F Benini
- GeneraLife IVF- Demetra center, Reproductive Medicine, Florence, Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- GeneraLife IVF- Clinica Valle Giulia, Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - M B Da. Canto
- Biogenesi Reproductive Medicine Center- Istituti Clinici Zucchi, Reproductive Medicine, Monza, Italy
| | - A Cesana
- Humanitas Fertility Center- Humanitas Research Hospital, Reproductive Medicine, Rozzano, Italy
| | - C Scarica
- European Hospital- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- GeneraLife IVF- Clinica Valle Giulia, Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - L D Santis
- Centro Scienze Natalità- Dept Ob/Gyn- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Reproductive Medicine, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cimadomo D, Innocenti F, Soscia D, Giancani A, Maggiulli R, Stoppa M, Dovere L, Albricci L, Fabozzi G, Scepi E, Chimienti F, Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. P–210 Abnormal cleavage patterns during embryo preimplantation development and their effect on blastulation: an overview from IVF patients with multiple IVF cycles in a time-lapse incubator. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
How common abnormal cleavage patterns (ACP) are in IVF and what are their consequences on embryo developmental competence?
Summary answer
ACP might affect up to 25% of the 2PN-zygotes, independently from patients’/cycles’ characteristics, and mostly cause embryo developmental arrest around the 4-to–8-cell transition.
What is known already
Since its implementation in IVF, time-lapse-microscopy (TLM) allowed the standardization of embryo culture within undisturbed incubators, but it has not improved embryo selection especially if blastocyst transfer is performed. Nevertheless, TLM holds the potential for boosting our knowledge of embryo preimplantation development. In particular, a continuous observation of embryo morpho-dynamics unveiled peculiar blastomere cleavage patterns previously unidentifiable with a static morphological assessment. These events are possibly associated with massive mitotic errors, affecting both chromosomes and cytoskeletal components, as well as downstream metabolic imbalances. Still, the causes of ACP and their consequences on embryo developmental/reproductive competence require further investigation.
Study design, size, duration
Observational study including 75 patients (age:38.6±3.7yr, FSH:8.8±3.6IU/l, AMH:1.7±1.3ng/ml; BMI:21.4±2.4) who conducted multiple IVF cycles (N = 160; 8.7±5.0 cumulus-oocyte-complexes and 6.3±3.6 metaphase-II collected; 201±245 days between first and second cycles) in a time-lapse incubator between 2014–2020. All annotations were performed blindly by two operators and confirmed by a third in case of discordance. The outcomes were the blastulation rate after any ACP, their association between each other and with patients’/cycles’ characteristics.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
We included only ICSI-cycles after ovarian-stimulation with blastocyst culture conducted in the Embryoscope. Overall, 981 metaphase-II were inseminated and 677 2PN-zygotes annotated. The ACP investigated were: (i)cytokinesis-failure, formation of cytoplasmic septa without cell division; (ii)Chaotic-cleavage, disordered and uneven cleavages; (iii)Direct-unequal-cleavage (DUC), cleavage of zygotes or single blastomeres directly into 3; (iv)Rapid-cleavage, t3-t2<5hr; (v)Reverse-cleavage, fusion of 2 blastomeres into 1; (vi)Fragmentation, presence of numerous non-nucleated fragments; (vii)Blastomeres’ exclusion/extrusion, nucleated cells excluded/extruded from the morula.
Main results and the role of chance
Among the 2PN-zygotes, the prevalence of cytokinesis-failure was 5.9% (N = 40/677), 15.7% for chaotic-cleavage (N = 106/677), 18.6% for DUC (N = 126/677), 4.1% for rapid-cleavage (N = 28/677), 3.5% for reverse-cleavage (N = 24/677) and 24.1% for fragmentation (N = 163/677). Among the morulae, the prevalence of blastomere exclusion/extrusion was 27% (N = 109/410;1.5±1.2 excluded/extruded cells,range:1–7). The risk for reverse-cleavage was higher among 2PN-zygotes facing failed-cytokinesis (N = 8/40,20% versus N = 16/637,2.5%, OR:9.7,95%CI:3.9–24.3,p<0.01). Fragmentation was instead higher among 2PN-zygotes undergoing chaotic cleavage (N = 47/106,44.3% versus N = 116/571,20.3%, OR:3.1,95%CI:2–4.8,p<0.01) or DUC (N = 46/126,36.5% versus N = 117/551,21.2%, OR:2.1,95%CI:1.4–3.2,p<0.01). Lastly, higher prevalence of blastomeres’ exclusion/extrusion were reported among morulae obtained after chaotic-cleavage (N = 17/29,58.6% versus N = 92/381,24.1%, OR:4.4,95%CI:2–9.7,p<0.01), DUC (N = 26/37,70.3% versus N = 83/373,22.3%, OR:8.3,95%CI:3.9–17.4,p<0.01) and in presence of fragmentation (N = 79/195,75.2% versus N = 30/305,9.8%, OR:27.8,95%CI:15.6–49.8,p<0.01); only a higher trend after rapid-/reverse-cleavage.
No predictive factor of ACP was identified among patients’ and cycles’ characteristics, except for higher risks of fragmentation (OR:2.6,95%CI:1.1–6.3,p= 0.04) and blastomeres’ exclusion/extrusion (OR:2.7,95%CI:1.1–7.2,p=0.04) among patients with previous experience with these events.
The viable-blastocyst rate per 2PN-zygote was 45.1% (N = 305/677). It was lower in case of failed-cytokinesis (N = 12/40,30% versus N = 293/637,46%, OR:0.5,95%CI:0.25–0.99,p=0.05), chaotic cleavage (N = 20/106,18.9% versus N = 285/571,49.9%, OR:0.23,95%CI:0.14–0.39,p<0.01), DUC (N = 27/126,21.4% versus N = 278/551,50.5%, OR:0.27,95%CI:0.17–0.42,p<0.01), rapid-cleavage (N = 6/22,21.4% versus N = 299/649,46.1%, OR:0.32,95%CI:0.13–0.8,p=0.02), and reverse-cleavage (N = 5/19,20.8% versus N = 300/653,45.9%, OR:0.31, 95%CI:0.11–0.84,p=0.02). No difference was instead shown in case of fragmentation and/or blastomeres’ exclusion/extrusion.
Limitations, reasons for caution
The patients included were poor-prognosis women undergoing ≥2 cycles. We are expanding the sample size to account for all cycles conducted in time-lapse incubators. Larger sample size will provide also statistical-power to investigate the effect of ACP on blastocysts’ chromosomal and implantation competence, and more visualizations of rapid-/reverse-cleavage events.
Wider implications of the findings: After ACP,developmental-arrest mostly occurs around the 4-to–8-cell transition (50–70% versus ∼30%), when embryonic-genome-activation takes place. Surviving embryos often fragment and/or exclude/extrude blastomeres at morulation, without further impact on blastulation-rates. Moreover, ACP seem independent from patients’/cycles’ characteristics. These evidence incite future Research on the biological/genetic mechanisms triggering ACP and their consequences.
Trial registration number
None
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Cimadomo
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - F Innocenti
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - D Soscia
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - A Giancani
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - M Stoppa
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - L Dovere
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - L Albricci
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - G Fabozzi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - E Scepi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - F Chimienti
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - A Capalbo
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - F M Ubaldi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maggiulli R, Cimadomo D, Dovere L, Innocenti F, Albricci L, Soscia D, Giancani A, Sanges F, Amendola MG, Tacconi L, Nastri G, Morgante V, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. P-783 Clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer are independent of cryo-storage duration. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab125.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Is cryo-storage duration associated with the outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfer?
Summary answer
Lower live-birth-rates from blastocysts cryo-stored for periods longer than 3-months are mostly imputable to the worse quality of the embryos being warmed across sequential transfers.
What is known already
Blastocyst vitrification is crucial in modern IVF. Given its widespread application, a constant comprehensive monitoring of its effect on reproductive outcomes is pivotal. For instance, the effect of cryo-storage duration on embryo implantation potential, gestational and perinatal outcomes is object of a still ongoing investigation. The evidence in this regard are contrasting especially with regard to similar or decreased live birth rates among blastocysts subject to long-term cryo-storage. When investigating the neonatal outcomes, instead, no impact of blastocyst cryo-storage duration has ever been reported to date. Yet, data on euploid blastocysts and adjusted for quality and full-blastulation day are needed.
Study design, size, duration
Retrospective observational study. We included 2688 vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers. The primary outcome was the live-birth-rates (LBR) according to cryo-storage duration clustered as ≤ 60, 61-90, 91-180, 181-360, 361-720, 721-1080 and >1080-days. The secondary outcomes were the miscarriage rate, the rates of gestational and perinatal issues among the deliveries, and the mean gestational age and birthweight among the babies born. All data were adjusted for confounders through linear or logistic regression analyses.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
We included all vitrified-warmed transfers (range:1-8) conducted between May-2013 and March-2020 by 1884 patients (age:38±3yr) undergoing one blastocyst stage PGT-A cycle and obtaining ≥1 euploid embryo at our private clinic. Among putative confounders, only the number of sequential transfer from the same patient, blastocyst quality (Gardner’s scheme) and full-blastulation day (5-7) significantly associated with the LBR through univariate regressions. No association was reported for sperm factor, maternal age, incubator, and culture media.
Main results and the role of chance
The LBR of euploid blastocysts cryo-stored for ≤60-days was 49.4% (N = 319/646) versus 48.7% (N = 292/599; OR:0.98,95%CI:0.78-1.21,p = 0.82) between 61-90-days, 42.9% (N = 291/679; OR:0.77,95%CI:0.62-0.96,p = 0.02) between 91-180-days, 41.7% (N = 169/405; OR:0.73,95%CI:0.57-0.94,p = 0.02) between 181-360-days, 34.7% (N = 50/144; OR:0.55,95%CI:0.37-0.79,p < 0.01) between 361-720-days, 53.4% (N = 63/118; OR:1.17,95%CI:0.79-1.74,p = 0.42) between 721-1080-days, and 50.5% (N = 49/97; OR:1.05,95%CI:0.68-1.60,p = 0.83) for >1080-days. However, when these data were adjusted for blastocyst quality and full-blastulation day, all the multivariate-OR were not-significant. Indeed, the longer the cryo-storage period the worse the quality of the euploid blastocysts transferred (e.g. AA-blastocysts were 74% among embryos cryo-stored for ≤90-days, but always < 70% for embryos cryo-stored for longer periods, p < 0.01; similarly, day5-blastocysts were ∼50% among embryos cryo-stored for ≤90-days, but always < 50% for embryos cryo-stored for longer periods, p = 0.02). The miscarriage-rate (overall 14%, ranging 7-18%) was not associated with cryo-storage duration already from univariate regressions. Also the gestational (overall 6%, ranging 0-8%) and perinatal issues rates (overall 3%, ranging 0-5%) were not associated with cryo-storage duration already from the univariate regressions. Neither the gestational age nor the birthweight showed significant associations with cryo-storage duration, as confirmed by linear regressions. In fact the rate of newborns whose weight was normal-for-gestational-age was similar across all cryo-storage duration groups (overall 81%, ranging 80-83%).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The prevalence of first transfers decreases from ≥95% for procedures conducted ≤90-days from vitrification to 71%, 39%, 22% and 4% for procedures conducted between 91-180, 181-360, 361-720 and >720-days, respectively. However, also the sequential number of transfer was not associated with the LBR when adjusted for blastocyst-quality and full-blastulation day.
Wider implications of the findings
Cryo-storage by vitrification is confirmed safe in the hands of experienced operators, and its duration does not impact any outcome. This information is valuable for freeze-all cycles, but also for women cryo-preserving surplus embryos for second pregnancies; in this regard, 6.8% of the patients in this study delivered ≥2 LBs.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Dovere
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F Innocenti
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Albricci
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - D Soscia
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - A Giancani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F Sanges
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - M G Amendola
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Tacconi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - G Nastri
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - V Morgante
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - A Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fabozzi G, Cimadomo D, Allori M, Vaiarelli A, Colamaria S, Argento C, Amendola MG, Innocenti F, Soscia D, Maggiulli R, Mazzilli R, Marchetti M, Ubaldi N, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. P–519 Investigation of embryo chromosomal constitution and live birth rate after vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfer across ranges of maternal body-mass-index. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Does maternal body-mass-index (BMI) associate with blastocysts’ chromosomal constitution and clinical outcomes in infertile patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)?
Summary answer
A higher euploidy rate per biopsied blastocyst was reported among underweight women. Overweight women were instead subject to higher miscarriage (MR) and lower live-birth-rates (LBR).
What is known already
Different studies in the literature revealed an association between BMI and infertility, suggesting a J-shaped relationship: both underweight and overweight women can suffer from infertility issues. Even if IVF might increase the success rate in both these categories of patients, it seems insufficient per se to overcome the complex and multifactorial fertility impairment derived from unbalanced nutritional intakes. Miscarriage, in particular, is common in both underweight and overweight women. However, most of the literature is based on chromosomally-untested embryos. Study design, size, duration: Retrospective observational study. Only the first IVF cycle with ≥1 biopsied blastocyst from each woman was included. The primary outcome was the association between maternal BMI (underweight, BMI<18.5, n = 160; normal-weight, BMI=18–25, N = 1392; overweight, BMI>25, N = 259) and the mean euploidy rate per cohort of biopsied blastocysts (m-ER). The secondary outcomes were the association between maternal BMI with clinical (mainly MR and LBR), gestational and perinatal outcomes after first vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfers.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
We included 1811 women undergoing PGT-A at a private IVF center between April–2013 and March–2020. The secondary outcomes were investigated on 1125 first vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfers from all patients obtaining ≥1 transferable blastocyst. Only ICSI with ejaculated sperm and continuous culture in standard incubators were performed. Logistic regressions were conducted to identify putative confounders and adjust the results accordingly.
Main results and the role of chance
Except for a lower maternal age among underweight women (38.3±3.1 versus 38.9±3.4 yr, p < 0.01) and higher among overweight ones (39.3±3.6 yr, p = 0.04), no difference was reported with respect to normal-weight women in terms of duration of infertility, hormonal levels, main cause of infertility, sperm quality, and reproductive history. The mean number of biopsied blastocysts was ∼3 in all groups. The m-ER shows a decreasing trend as the maternal BMI increases between 17 and 22–23, to then plateau. In fact, a significant difference was reported between underweight (50.8%±36.4%) and normal-weight women (41.4%±37.5%, p < 0.01). A linear regression adjusted for maternal age confirmed this moderate association between increasing BMI and m-ER (unstandardized-coefficient-B –0.6%, 95%CI:–1.1% to –0.1%, p = 0.02).
Morphological quality and day of full-blastulation among transferred euploid blastocysts was similar in the three groups. Overweight women showed higher MR per pregnancy (N = 20/75, 26.7%, 95%CI:17.4%–38.3% versus N = 67/461, 14.5%, 95%CI:11.5%–18.2%; OR 2.0, 95%CI:1.1–3.6, p = 0.01) and lower LBR per transfer (N = 55/154, 35.7%, 95%CI:28.3%–43.8% versus N = 388/859, 45.2%, 95%CI:41.8%–48.6%; OR adjusted for euploid blastocysts’ features 0.67, 95%CI:0.46–0.96, p = 0.03). Clinical outcomes were instead similar among underweight and normal-weight women. All gestational and perinatal outcomes were comparable in the tree groups.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Our study is limited by its retrospective nature, and the fact that maternal BMI was measured only before oocyte retrieval and not before embryo transfer. Moreover, the reduced sample size did not allow for further relevant sub-analyses among solely obese women.
Wider implications of the findings: When possible nutritional/lifestyle modifications should be encouraged to adjust maternal BMI before IVF. Overweight patients should be especially informed of their higher risk for miscarriage. Yet, BMI is just a gross marker, future studies based on body fat localization and percentage (e.g. by bioelectrical impedance analyses) are desirable.
Trial registration number
None
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - D Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - M Allori
- University Carlo Bo, Faculty of Biology, Urbino, Italy
| | - A Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - S Colamaria
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - C Argento
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - M G Amendola
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F Innocenti
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - D Soscia
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - R Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - R Mazzilli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - M Marchetti
- University of Rome Tor Vergata, Biomedicine and Prevention, Rome, Italy
| | - N Ubaldi
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Rome, Italy
| | - L Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| | - F M Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Dovere L, Tacconi L, Soscia D, Giancani A, Scepi E, Maggiulli R, Vaiarelli A, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:929-940. [PMID: 33608730 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is there an association between patients' reproductive history and the mean euploidy rates per biopsied blastocysts (m-ER) or the live birth rates (LBRs) per first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers? SUMMARY ANSWER Patients' reproductive history (as annotated during counselling) showed no association with the m-ER, but a lower LBR was reported after euploid blastocyst transfer in women with a history of repeated implantation failure (RIF). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Several studies have investigated the association between the m-ER and (i) patients' basal characteristics, (ii) ovarian stimulation strategy and dosage, (iii) culture media and conditions, and (iv) embryo morphology and day of full blastocyst development. Conversely, the expected m-ER due to women's reproductive history (previous live births (LBs), miscarriages, failed IVF cycles and transfers, and lack of euploid blastocysts among prior cohorts of biopsied embryos) still needs investigations. Yet, this information is critical to counsel new patients about a first cycle with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), but even more so after former adverse outcomes to prevent treatment drop-out. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This observational study included all patients undergoing a comprehensive chromosome testing (CCT)-based PGT-A cycle with at least one biopsied blastocyst in the period April 2013-December 2019 at a private IVF clinic (n = 2676 patients undergoing 2676 treatments and producing and 8151 blastocysts). m-ER were investigated according to women's reproductive history of LBs: no/≥1, miscarriages: no/1/>1; failed IVF cycles: no/1/2/>2, and implantation failures after previous transfers: no/1/2/>2. Among the 2676 patients included in this study, 440 (16%) had already undergone PGT-A before the study period; the data from these patients were further clustered according to the presence or absence of euploid embryo(s) in their previous cohort of biopsied blastocysts. The clinical outcomes per first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers (n =1580) were investigated according to the number of patients' previous miscarriages and implantation failures. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The procedures involved in this study included ICSI, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy without hatching in Day 3, CCT-based PGT-A without reporting segmental and/or putative mitotic (or mosaic) aneuploidies and single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer. For statistical analysis, Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as well as linear regressions and generalised linear models among ranges of maternal age at oocyte retrieval were performed to identify significant differences for continuous variables. Fisher's exact tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses were instead used for categorical variables. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Maternal age at oocyte retrieval was the only variable significantly associated with the m-ER. We defined five clusters (<35 years: 66 ± 31%; 35-37 years: 58 ± 33%; 38-40 years: 43 ± 35%; 40-42 years: 28 ± 34%; and >42 years: 17 ± 31%) and all analyses were conducted among them. The m-ER did not show any association with the number of previous LBs, miscarriages, failed IVF cycles or implantation failures. Among patients who had already undergone PGT-A before the study period, the m-ER did not associate with the absence (or presence) of euploid blastocysts in their former cohort of biopsied embryos. Regarding clinical outcomes of the first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer, the implantation rate was 51%, the miscarriage rate was 14% and the LBR was 44%. This LBR was independent of the number of previous miscarriages, but showed a decreasing trend depending on the number of previous implantation failures, reaching statistical significance when comparing patients with >2 failures and patients with no prior failure (36% versus 47%, P < 0.01; multivariate-OR adjusted for embryo quality and day of full blastocyst development: 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, P < 0.01). No such differences were shown for previous miscarriage rates. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The sample size for treatments following a former completed PGT-A cycle should be larger in future studies. The data should be confirmed from a multicentre perspective. The analysis should be performed also in non-PGT cycles and/or including patients who did not produce blastocysts, in order to investigate a putative association between women's reproductive history with outcomes other than euploidy and LBRs. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These data are critical to counsel infertile couples before, during and after a PGT-A cycle, especially to prevent treatment discontinuation due to previous adverse reproductive events. Beyond the 'maternal age effect', the causes of idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and RIF are likely to be endometrial receptivity and selectivity issues; transferring euploid blastocysts might reduce the risk of a further miscarriage, but more information beyond euploidy are required to improve the prognosis in case of RIF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding was received and there are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa Dovere
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Tacconi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Daria Soscia
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Laura Rienzi
- GeneraLife IVF, Clinica Valle Giulia, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maggiulli R, Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Papini L, Dovere L, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. The effect of ICSI-related procedural timings and operators on the outcome. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:32-43. [PMID: 31916573 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do the ICSI-related procedural timings and operators affect the outcomes of an ART cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER The ICSI-related timings and operators do not associate with the mean blastulation rate per cohort of inseminated oocytes and the cumulative delivery rate per concluded cycle, except for a mild association between the times from induction of ovulation to oocyte denudation and the former outcome. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In ART, specific timings, protocols and conditions must be complied with to preserve gamete developmental and reproductive competence during the required manipulations. ICSI represents a groundbreaking advancement that has been widely implemented. Nevertheless, the studies that examined the putative impact of ICSI-related procedural timings were mainly conducted in old-fashioned settings or in good prognosis patients. No report addressed issues like operators' skills and experience and uncertainties exist dealing with the effect of cumulus cells in the pre-incubation period in vitro before ICSI. However, all this information is crucial to efficiently plan the daily routine of an IVF lab, fill the existing gaps of knowledge and define proper key performance indicators. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Observational study conducted at a private IVF clinic (January 2016 to January 2018). We included all consecutive ICSI procedures (n = 1084 infertile couples undergoing 1444 cycles with or without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT); mean ± SD maternal age: 38.1 ± 4.0 years) with fresh autologous oocytes (n = 7999 oocytes, 5.5 ± 3.2 per treatment) inseminated with fresh non-donor ejaculated sperm. All operators and critical procedural timings (induction of ovulation to oocyte denudation, denudation and ICSI) were automatically recorded through an electronic witnessing system. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative delivery rate among both non-PGT and PGT-concluded cycles (i.e. delivery achieved or no supernumerary cryopreserved blastocyst available). The secondary outcome measure was the mean blastulation rate per cohort of inseminated oocytes. All confounders were registered and included in generalized linear models and multivariate logistic regression analyses. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Fourteen and 12 operators were involved in denudation and ICSI procedures, respectively. Denudation was performed after 4.1 ± 1.2 h (2-7) of pre-incubation in vitro after oocyte retrieval, and ICSI was started immediately after. Beyond procedural timings and operators, all the putative confounders (patients' and cycles' characteristics) on the primary and/or secondary outcomes were systematically registered and included in the statistical analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The mean time from induction of ovulation to oocyte denudation was 39.3 ± 1.3 h. The mean procedural timings for denudation and ICSI were 8.1 ± 3.8 and 12.6 ± 6.4 min; both these variables were significantly dependent on the number of inseminated oocytes and the operators' skills and experience. The overall mean blastulation rate per cohort of inseminated oocytes was 34.0 ± 27.9%. This outcome was significantly associated with the time from induction of ovulation to oocyte denudation (mean blastulation rate stable in the time interval 38-42 h, but significantly higher for timings <38 h), maternal age (the mean blastulation rate drops especially beyond the age of 40 years) and categorized sperm concentration (highest mean blastulation rate for sperm concentrations ≥15 mil/ml and lowest for cryptozoospermic patients) through a generalized linear model that showed an adjusted r2 = 0.053 (P < 0.01). No association was found for denudation and ICSI timings and operators. Lastly, when adjusted for maternal age and number of inseminated oocytes, both ICSI-related procedural timings and operators did not associate with the cumulative delivery rate among both non-PGT- or PGT-concluded cycles. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a single private IVF center study. Its reproducibility should be assessed in different laboratory conditions, with different protocols and in the hands of different operators. Moreover, specific studies are warranted to address the beneficial/detrimental effect of the other putative confounders under investigation (e.g. kind of ovulation trigger, culture media, incubator, etc.). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Proactive communication between the embryologists and the clinicians might contribute to a reasoned and more efficient organization of the daily workload and increase the mean blastulation rate, especially when poor prognosis couples (advanced maternal age, reduced sperm count and/or ovarian reserve) are treated. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding. The authors declare no conflict of interest related to the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,G.EN.E.R.A. Umbria, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Umbertide, Italy
| | - Gemma Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,G.EN.E.R.A. Umbria, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Umbertide, Italy
| | - Letizia Papini
- G.EN.E.R.A. Umbria, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Umbertide, Italy
| | - Lisa Dovere
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,G.EN.E.R.A. Umbria, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Umbertide, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,G.EN.E.R.A. Umbria, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Umbertide, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Vaiarelli A, Dusi L, Buffo L, Amendola MG, Colamaria S, Giuliani M, Bruno G, Stoppa M, Ubaldi FM. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:785-795. [PMID: 32240287 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Which is the most suitable clinical strategy in egg donation IVF cycles conducted with imported donated vitrified oocytes? SUMMARY ANSWER The importation, and allocation, of at least eight vitrified eggs per couple during an egg donation cycle is associated with a high cumulative live birth delivery rate per cycle, as well as the confident adoption of a single blastocyst transfer strategy to minimize the risk of multiple pregnancies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY IVF using donor eggs is commonly used worldwide to treat women who are unable to conceive with their own oocytes. In 2014, the Constitutional Court (n.162/2014) gave permission for gamete donation to be allowed for ART in Italy. Initially recommended as a therapeutic approach for premature ovarian insufficiency, the use of donated oocytes has become more and more common. In countries such as Italy, fresh oocyte donation is theoretically possible, but practically impossible due to the lack of donors. In fact, the Italian law does not allow reimbursement to the young women, who can only voluntarily donate their eggs. Therefore, Italian IVF centers have established several collaborations with international oocyte cryo-banks. The most popular workflow involves the importation of donated oocytes that have been vitrified. However, recent evidence has questioned the overall efficacy of such an approach. This is because detrimental effects arising from oocyte vitrification and warming might reduce the number of eggs available for insemination, with a consequential reduction in the achievable live birth rate per cycle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a longitudinal cohort study, conducted between October 2015 and December 2018 at two private IVF centers. Overall, 273 couples were treated (mean maternal age: 42.5 ± 3.5 years, range: 31-50 years; mean donor age: 25.7 ± 4.2, 20-35 years) with oocytes purchased from three different Spanish egg banks. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We performed an overall analysis, as well as several sub-analyses clustering the data according to the year of treatment (2015-2016, 2017 or 2018), the number of warmed (6, 7, 8 or 9) and surviving oocytes (≤4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9) and the cycle strategy adopted (cleavage stage embryo transfer and vitrification, cleavage stage embryo transfer and blastocyst vitrification, blastocyst stage embryo transfer and vitrification). This study aimed to create a workflow to maximize IVF efficacy, efficiency, and safety, during egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth delivery rate among completed cycles (i.e. cycles where at least a delivery of a live birth was achieved, or no embryo was produced/left to transfer). All cycles, along with their embryological, obstetric and neonatal outcomes, were registered and inspected. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The survival rate after warming was 86 ± 16%. When 6, 7, 8 and 9 oocytes were warmed, 94, 100, 72 and 70% of cycles were completed, resulting in 35, 44, 69 and 59% cumulative live birth delivery rates per completed cycle, respectively. When ≤4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 oocytes survived, 98, 94, 85, 84, 66 and 68% of cycles were completed, resulting in 16, 46, 50, 61, 76 and 60% cumulative live birth delivery rates per completed cycle, respectively. When correcting for donor age, and oocyte bank, in a multivariate logistic regression analysis, warming eight to nine oocytes resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.07-6.03, P = 0.03) for the cumulative live birth delivery rate per completed cycle with respect to six to seven oocytes. Similarly, when seven to nine oocytes survived warming, the OR was 2.7 (95% CI: 1.28-5.71, P < 0.01) with respect to ≤6 oocytes. When cleavage stage embryos were transferred, a single embryo transfer strategy was adopted in 17% of cases (N = 28/162); the live birth delivery rate per transfer was 26% (n = 43/162), but among the pregnancies to term, 28% involved twins (n = 12/43). Conversely, when blastocysts were transferred, a single embryo transfer strategy was adopted in 96% of cases (n = 224/234) with a 30% live birth delivery rate per transfer (N = 70/234), and the pregnancies to term were all singleton (n = 70/70). During the study period, 125 babies were born from 113 patients. When comparing the obstetric outcomes for the cleavage and blastocyst stage transfer strategies, the only significant difference was the prevalence of low birthweight: 34 versus 5%, respectively (P < 0.01). However, several significant differences were identified when comparing singleton with twin pregnancies; in fact, the latter resulted in a generally lower birthweight (mean ± SD: 3048 ± 566 g versus 2271 ± 247 g, P < 0.01), a significantly shorter gestation (38 ± 2 versus 36 ± 2 weeks, P < 0.01), solely Caesarean sections (72 versus 100%, P = 0.02), a higher prevalence of low birthweight (8 versus 86%, P < 0.01), small newborns for gestational age (24 versus 57%, P = 0.02) and preterm births (25 versus 86%, P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This retrospective study should now be confirmed across several IVF centers and with a greater sample size in order to improve the accuracy of the sub-analyses. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Single blastocyst transfer is the most suitable approach to achieve high success rates per procedure, thereby also limiting the obstetric complications that arise from twin pregnancies in oocyte donation programs. In this regard, the larger the cohort of imported donated vitrified oocytes, the more efficient the management of each cycle. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Dusi
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Laura Buffo
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Colamaria
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Giuliani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulietta Bruno
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Stoppa
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.,GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fabozzi G, Albricci L, Cimadomo D, Amendola MG, Sanges F, Maggiulli R, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Blastulation rates of sibling oocytes in two IVF culture media: an evidence-based workflow to implement newly commercialized products. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 42:311-322. [PMID: 33288477 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION An evidence-based novel commercially available continuous IVF culture medium in compliance with an efficient quality-management system is proposed. DESIGN Non-interventional study on sibling oocytes. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles among women aged 42 years or younger that used ejaculated spermatozoa and retrieved four to eight oocytes were included. Sibling oocytes were randomized for culture in the novel Geri-medium or continuous single culture medium (CSCM). Primary outcome measure was blastulation rate per cohort of inseminated oocytes; 1182 oocytes were required to outline down to a 7% difference (power = 80%). RESULTS A total of 181 cohorts of sibling oocytes were included. Geri-medium (n = 631 oocytes) and CSCM (n = 643 oocytes) resulted in similar blastulation rates (mean ± SD: 42.8% ± 30.1% versus 43.1% ± 29.0%; Wilcoxon signed rank test = 0.77). Blastocysts cultured in the former (n = 275 versus n = 277) showed longer timings during preimplantation development (P < 0.01) and were poorer quality (26% versus 18%; P = 0.03). Euploidy rate was no different in cycles that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (n = 113) (117/237 [49%] versus 117/249 blastocysts [47%]; P = 0.6). Ongoing implantation rate was comparable in the study arms after euploid (29/47 [63%] versus 14/ 34 [41%]; P = 0.1) or untested (12/31 [39%] versus 7/18 [39%]; P = 0.3) transfers. CONCLUSION Blastulation rate among cohorts of sibling oocytes cultured in the same incubator is a fast, reliable and comprehensive performance indicator to validate novel commercially available culture medium. The media tested were considered similarly efficient. The differences in blastocyst morphology and developmental timings warrant further investigation, although euploidy and ongoing implantation rates were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy.
| | - Laura Albricci
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Amendola
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy
| | - Federica Sanges
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, via G de Notaris 2b, Rome 00197, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Vaiarelli A, Dusi L, Buffo L, Amendola MG, Colamaria S, Giuliani M, Bruno G, Stoppa M, Ubaldi FM. Corrigendum. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:1944. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Dusi
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | - Laura Buffo
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Colamaria
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Giuliani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulietta Bruno
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Stoppa
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
- GENERA Veneto, GENERA Center for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cimadomo D, Soscia D, Vaiarelli A, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing. Hum Reprod 2020; 34:1206-1214. [PMID: 31247100 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Which are the clinical benefits and risks of including poor-quality blastocysts (PQBs) in the cohort of biopsied embryos during a cycle with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)? SUMMARY ANSWER PQBs show a worse prognosis with respect to sibling non-PQBs, but their clinical use allows an overall 2.6% increase in the number of live births (LBs) achievable after PGT-A. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PQBs (<BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft's classification) are generally disregarded for clinical use and/or research purposes. Therefore, limited data exist in literature to estimate the benefits and risks deriving from the transfer of a PQB. In Italy, the law imposes the transfer or cryopreservation of all embryos, unless proven not viable. This regulation has allowed the production of a large amount of data regarding poor-quality embryos. Previous reports outlined a lower chance of euploidy and implantation for PQBs. Yet, a comprehensive picture of their real clinical contribution is missing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This observational cohort study including 2757 oocyte retrievals for PGT-A (mean maternal age, 39.6 ± 3.3 years) conducted at a private IVF centre between April 2013 and May 2018. A total of 1497 PQBs were obtained and their embryological, chromosomal and clinical features were compared to 5250 non-PQBs (≥BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft's classification) and adjusted for all significant confounders. After defining the overall increase in LBs due to PQBs, we outlined the population of patients who might benefit the most from their clinical use. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS ICSI cycles, involving ovarian stimulation, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification, comprehensive chromosome testing and vitrified-warmed euploid single embryo transfers (SETs), were conducted. Overall analyses and sub-analyses in populations of patients clustered according to maternal age at retrieval and size of the cohort of sibling non-PQBs were performed. Finally, the risk of miscarriage and the chance of LB per biopsied PQB and non-PQB were estimated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE PQBs allowed a 12.4% increase in the cycles where ≥1 blastocyst was biopsied. To date, we report a concurrent 2.6% increase in the cycles resulting in ≥1 LB. On average 0.7 ± 0.9 (range, 0-9) PQBs were obtained per cycle for biopsy, including 0.2 ± 0.4 (range, 0-5) euploid PQBs. Maternal age solely correlates with the prevalence of PQBs from both overall and cycle-based analyses. Indeed, the patients who benefit the most from these embryos (i.e. 18 women achieving their only LBs thanks to PQBs) cluster among women older than 42 years and/or those with no or few sibling non-PQBs (1.1 ± 1.1; range, 0-3). The 1497 PQBs compared to the 5250 non-PQBs showed slower development (Day 5, 10.1% versus 43.9%; Day 6, 60.5% versus 50.8%; Day 7, 29.4% versus 5.2%) and lower euploidy rates (23.5% versus 51%; adjusted OR, 0.36). Among the 195 and 1697 transferred euploid PQBs and non-PQBs, the former involved a lower implantation rate (16.9% versus 52.3%) and a higher miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy (36.4% versus 13.9%), therefore resulting in a lower LB rate (LBR, 10.8% versus 44.6%; adjusted OR, 0.22). Based on these rates, we estimated an overall 1.5% risk of miscarriage and 2.6% chance of LB after euploid vitrified-warmed SET per each biopsied PQB. The same estimates for non-PQBs were 3.7% and 22.8%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The clinical benefit of PQBs is underestimated since they are the last option for transfer and this analysis entailed only the first LB. The higher miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy here reported might be the consequence of a population of patients of poorer prognosis undergoing the SET of euploid PQBs, an option that requires further investigation. Finally, a cost-benefit analysis is needed in a prospective non-selection fashion. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS PQBs show higher aneuploidy rates. If to be included, PGT-A is recommended. When selected against aneuploid-PQBs, euploid ones could still involve a worse prognosis, yet, their LBR is not negligible. Women should be informed that a poor morphology does not define a non-viable embryo per se, although PQBs show a reduced chance of resulting in an LB. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was used for this study. The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Cimadomo
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Daria Soscia
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Capalbo
- Igenomix Italia, Marostica, via Fermi 1, Marostica, Italy.,Department of Anatomical Sciences, Histological, Legal, Medical and Locomotor, Unit of Histology and Medical Embryology, Sapienza University of Rome, via Scarpa 16, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. De Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Blastocyst biopsy is performed to obtain a reliable genetic diagnosis during IVF cycles with preimplantation genetic testing. Then, the ideal workflow entails a safe and efficient vitrification protocol, due to the turnaround time of the diagnostic techniques and to transfer the selected embryo(s) on a physiological endometrium in a following natural cycle. A biopsy approach encompassing the sequential opening of the zona pellucida and retrieval of 5-10 trophectoderm cells (ideally 7-8) limits both the number of manipulations required and the exposure of the embryo to sub-optimal environmental conditions. After proper training, the technique was reproducible across different operators in terms of timing of biopsy (~8 min, ranging 3-22 min based on the number of embryos to biopsy per dish), conclusive diagnoses obtained (~97.5%) and live birth rates after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer (>40%). The survival rate after biopsy, vitrification and warming was as high as 99.8%. The re-expansion rate at 1.5 h from warming was as high as 97%, largely dependent on the timing between biopsy and vitrification (ideally ≤30 min), blastocyst morphological quality and day of biopsy. In general, it is better to vitrify a collapsed blastocyst; therefore, in non-PGT cycles, laser-assisted artificial shrinkage might be performed to induce embryo collapse prior to cryopreservation. The most promising future perspective is the non-invasive analysis of the IVF culture media after blastocyst culture as a putative source of embryonic DNA. However, this potential avant-garde is still under investigation and a reliable protocol yet needs to be defined and validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adriano Giancani
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine; DAHFMO, Unit of Histology and Medical Embryology, Sapienza University of Rome
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Iussig B, Maggiulli R, Fabozzi G, Bertelle S, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. A brief history of oocyte cryopreservation: Arguments and facts. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98:550-558. [PMID: 30739329 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The term "cryopreservation" refers to the process of cooling cells and tissues and storing them at subzero temperatures in order to stop all biological activity and preserve their viability and physiological competences for future use. Cooling to subzero temperatures is not a physiological condition for human cells; this is probably due to the high content of water in the living matter, whose conversion to ice crystals may be associated with severe and irreversible damage. Among reproductive cells and tissues, metaphase II oocytes are notably vulnerable to cryopreservation, mainly because of their large size, low surface area to volume ratio, relatively high water content and presence of the meiotic spindle. As human biological systems lack efficient internal defense mechanisms against chilling injuries, it is of the utmost importance to supply adequate external support, in terms of cryoprotectant additives, appropriate cooling/warming rates, and suitable long-term storage. Over the years, scientists have proposed different cryopreservation strategies in the effort to achieve an optimized recipe ensuring cell survival and, at the same time, maintenance of the physiological functions and abilities necessary to continue life. However, despite the first success obtained in the 1980s with frozen oocytes, it was not until recently that notable improvements in the cryopreservation technique, thanks to the advent of vitrification, allowed a breakthrough of this fine procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetta Iussig
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, G.EN.E.R.A. Veneto, Marostica, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Gemma Fabozzi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Bertelle
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, G.EN.E.R.A. Veneto, Marostica, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, G.EN.E.R.A. Veneto, Marostica, Italy.,G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo M Ubaldi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, G.EN.E.R.A. Veneto, Marostica, Italy.,G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, G.EN.E.R.A. Veneto, Marostica, Italy.,G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Fabozzi G, Venturella R, Maggiulli R, Mazzilli R, Ferrero S, Palagiano A, Rienzi L. Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:94. [PMID: 30842755 PMCID: PMC6391863 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced maternal age (AMA; >35 year) is associated with a decline in both ovarian reserve and oocyte competence. At present, no remedies are available to counteract the aging-related fertility decay, however different therapeutic approaches can be offered to women older than 35 year undergoing IVF. This review summarizes the main current strategies proposed for the treatment of AMA: (i) oocyte cryopreservation to conduct fertility preservation for medical reasons or "social freezing" for non-medical reasons, (ii) personalized controlled ovarian stimulation to maximize the exploitation of the ovarian reserve in each patient, (iii) enhancement of embryo selection via blastocyst-stage preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and frozen single embryo transfer, or (iv) oocyte donation in case of minimal/null residual chance of pregnancy. Future strategies and tools are in the pipeline that might minimize the risks of AMA through non-invasive approaches for embryo selection (e.g., molecular analyses of leftover products of IVF, such as spent culture media). These are yet challenging but potentially ground-breaking perspectives promising a lower clinical workload with a higher cost-effectiveness. We also reviewed emerging experimental therapeutic approaches to attempt at restoring maternal reproductive potential, e.g., spindle-chromosomal complex, pronuclear or mitochondrial transfer, and chromosome therapy. In vitro generation of gametes is also an intriguing challenge for the future. Lastly, since infertility is a social issue, social campaigns, and education among future generations are desirable to promote the awareness of the impact of age and lifestyle habits upon fertility. This should be a duty of the clinical operators in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Danilo Cimadomo
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Gemma Fabozzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Venturella
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Mazzilli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
- Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Susanna Ferrero
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Palagiano
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Reproductive Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Levi-Setti PE, Soscia D, Orlando G, Albani E, Parini V, Stoppa M, Dovere L, Tacconi L, Ievoli E, Maggiulli R, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Hum Reprod 2018; 33:1992-2001. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Capalbo
- Igenomix, via Fermi 1, Marostica, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, Istologiche, Medico-legali e Dell’apparato Locomotore, Sezione di Istologia ed Embriologia Medica, Sapienza University of Rome, via Scarpa 16, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Daria Soscia
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Orlando
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Albani
- Humanitas Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Valentina Parini
- Humanitas Fertility Center, Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marta Stoppa
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Lisa Dovere
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Tacconi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Ievoli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.en.e.r.a. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Capalbo A, Treff N, Cimadomo D, Tao X, Ferrero S, Vaiarelli A, Colamaria S, Maggiulli R, Orlando G, Scarica C, Scott R, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Abnormally fertilized oocytes can result in healthy live births: improved genetic technologies for preimplantation genetic testing can be used to rescue viable embryos in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2017; 108:1007-1015.e3. [PMID: 28923286 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether abnormally fertilized oocyte (AFO)-derived blastocysts are diploid and can be rescued for clinical use. DESIGN Longitudinal-cohort study from January 2015 to September 2016 involving IVF cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Ploidy assessment was incorporated whenever a blastocyst from a monopronuclear (1PN) or tripronuclear zygote (2PN + 1 smaller PN; 2.1 PN) was obtained. SETTING Private IVF clinics and genetics laboratories. PATIENT(S) A total of 556 women undergoing 719 PGT-A cycles. INTERVENTION(S) Conventional chromosome analysis was performed on trophectoderm biopsies by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. For AFO-derived blastocysts, ploidy assessment was performed on the same biopsy with the use of allele ratios for hetorozygous SNPs analyzed by means of next-generation sequencing (1:1 = diploid; 2:1 = triploid; loss of heterozygosity = haploid). Balanced-diploid 1PN- and 2.1PN-derived blastocysts were transferred in the absence of normally fertilized transferable embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Ploidy constitution and clinical value of AFO-derived blastocysts in IVF PGT-A cycles. RESULT(S) Of the 5,026 metaphase II oocytes injected, 5.2% and 0.7% showed 1PN and 2.1PN, respectively. AFOs showed compromised embryo development (P<.01). Twenty-seven AFO-derived blastocysts were analyzed for ploidy constitution. The 1PN-derived blastocysts were mostly diploid (n = 9/13; 69.2%), a few were haploid (n = 3/13; 23.1%), and one was triploid (n = 1/13; 7.7%). The 2.1PN-derived blastocysts were also mostly diploid (n = 12/14; 85.7%), and the remainder were triploid. Twenty-six PGT-A cycles resulted in one or more AFO-derived blastocysts (n = 26/719; 3.6%). Overall, eight additional balanced-diploid transferable embryos were obtained from AFOs. In three cycles, the only balanced-diploid blastocyst produced was from an AFO (n = 3/719; 0.4%). Three AFO-derived live births were achieved: one from a 1PN zygote and two from 2.1PN zygotes. CONCLUSION(S) Enhanced PGT-A technologies incorporating reliable ploidy assessment provide an effective tool to rescue AFO-derived blastocysts for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Capalbo
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy; Genetyx, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Marostica, Italy.
| | - Nathan Treff
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, Istologiche, Medico Legali e dell'Apparato Locomotore, Università degli Studi di Roma "Sapienza," Rome, Italy
| | - Xin Tao
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey
| | - Susanna Ferrero
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Colamaria
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Orlando
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Catello Scarica
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Richard Scott
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy; Genetyx, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Marostica, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Genera, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy; Genetyx, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Marostica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, Vanderpoel S, Racowsky C. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23:139-155. [PMID: 27827818 PMCID: PMC5850862 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Revised: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Successful cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos is essential not only to maximize the safety and efficacy of ovarian stimulation cycles in an IVF treatment, but also to enable fertility preservation. Two cryopreservation methods are routinely used: slow-freezing or vitrification. Slow-freezing allows for freezing to occur at a sufficiently slow rate to permit adequate cellular dehydration while minimizing intracellular ice formation. Vitrification allows the solidification of the cell(s) and of the extracellular milieu into a glass-like state without the formation of ice. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The objective of our study was to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes following slow-freezing/thawing versus vitrification/warming of oocytes and embryos and to inform the development of World Health Organization guidance on the most effective cryopreservation method. SEARCH METHODS A Medline search was performed from 1966 to 1 August 2016 using the following search terms: (Oocyte(s) [tiab] OR (Pronuclear[tiab] OR Embryo[tiab] OR Blastocyst[tiab]) AND (vitrification[tiab] OR freezing[tiab] OR freeze[tiab]) AND (pregnancy[tiab] OR birth[tiab] OR clinical[tiab]). Queries were limited to those involving humans. RCTs and cohort studies that were published in full-length were considered eligible. Each reference was reviewed for relevance and only primary evidence and relevant articles from the bibliographies of included articles were considered. References were included if they reported cryosurvival rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live-birth rate (LBR) or delivery rate for slow-frozen or vitrified human oocytes or embryos. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to calculate relative risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI. OUTCOMES One RCT study comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification of oocytes was included. Vitrification was associated with increased ongoing CPR per cycle (RR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.05-7.51; P = 0.039; 48 and 30 cycles, respectively, per transfer (RR = 1.81, 95% CI 0.71-4.67; P = 0.214; 47 and 19 transfers) and per warmed/thawed oocyte (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.28; P = 0.018; 260 and 238 oocytes). One RCT comparing vitrification versus fresh oocytes was analysed. In vitrification and fresh cycles, respectively, no evidence for a difference in ongoing CPR per randomized woman (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.87-1.21; P = 0.744, 300 women in each group), per cycle (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.18; P = 0.934; 267 versus 259 cycles) and per oocyte utilized (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82-1.26; P = 0.873; 3286 versus 3185 oocytes) was reported. Findings were consistent with relevant cohort studies. Of the seven RCTs on embryo cryopreservation identified, three met the inclusion criteria (638 warming/thawing cycles at cleavage and blastocyst stage), none of which involved pronuclear-stage embryos. A higher CPR per cycle was noted with embryo vitrification compared with slow-freezing, though this was of borderline statistical significance (RR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.00-3.59; P = 0.051; three RCTs; I2 = 71.9%). LBR per cycle was reported by one RCT performed with cleavage-stage embryos and was higher for vitrification (RR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.17-4.44; P = 0.016; 216 cycles; one RCT). A secondary analysis was performed focusing on embryo cryosurvival rate. Pooled data from seven RCTs (3615 embryos) revealed a significant improvement in embryo cryosurvival following vitrification as compared with slow-freezing (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.30-1.93; P < 0.001; I2 = 93%). WIDER IMPLICATIONS Data from available RCTs suggest that vitrification/warming is superior to slow-freezing/thawing with regard to clinical outcomes (low quality of the evidence) and cryosurvival rates (moderate quality of the evidence) for oocytes, cleavage-stage embryos and blastocysts. The results were confirmed by cohort studies. The improvements obtained with the introduction of vitrification have several important clinical implications in ART. Based on this evidence, in particular regarding cryosurvival rates, laboratories that continue to use slow-freezing should consider transitioning to the use of vitrification for cryopreservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rienzi
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Clarisa Gracia
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Daniel J. Kaser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Filippo M. Ubaldi
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, via de Notaris 2b, Rome, Italy
| | - Sheryl Vanderpoel
- HRP (the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction), Geneva, Switzerland(at the time of the study)
- Population Council, Reproductive Health Programme, New York, USA
| | - Catherine Racowsky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Forte M, Faustini F, Maggiulli R, Scarica C, Romano S, Ottolini C, Farcomeni A, Palagiano A, Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Electronic witness system in IVF-patients perspective. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016; 33:1215-22. [PMID: 27387889 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0759-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to evaluate patient concerns about in vitro fertilization (IVF) errors and electronic witness systems (EWS) satisfaction. DESIGN The design of this study is a prospective single-center cohort study. SETTING The setting of this study was located in the private IVF center. PATIENT(S) Four hundred eight infertile patients attending an IVF cycle at a GENERA center in Italy were equipped with an EWS. INTERVENTION(S) Although generally recognized as a very rare event in IVF, biological sample mix-up has been reported in the literature. For this reason, some IVF laboratories have introduced EWS with the aim to further reduce the risk of error during biological samples handling. Participating patients received a questionnaire developed through a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 6. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S) Patient concerns about sample mix-up without and with an EWS were assessed. RESULT(S) 90.4 % of patients expressed significant concerns relating to sample mix-up. The EWS reduced these concerns in 92.1 % of patients, 97.1 % of which were particularly satisfied with the electronic traceability of their gametes and embryos in the IVF laboratory. 97.1 % of patients felt highly comfortable with an IVF center equipped with an EWS. Female patients had a significantly higher appreciation of the EWS when compared to their male partners (p = 0.029). A significant mix-up event occurred in an Italian hospital during the study and patient's satisfaction increased significantly towards the use of the EWS after the event (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION(S) EWS, by sensibly reducing the risk for sample mix-up in IVF cycles, has been proved to be a trusted strategy from patient's perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Forte
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Faustini
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy
| | - Catello Scarica
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.,The Bridge Centre, London, UK
| | - Stefania Romano
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Farcomeni
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Capalbo
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.,GENETYX, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, E.Fermi, 1 36063 Marostica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- G.ENE.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cimadomo D, Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Maggiulli R, Scarica C, Romano S, Poggiana C, Zuccarello D, Giancani A, Vaiarelli A, Rienzi L. Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during PGD/PGS cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2016; 33:360-9. [PMID: 27372783 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Revised: 06/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and aneuploidy testing (PGD/PGS) use is constantly growing in IVF, and embryo/biopsy traceability during the additional laboratory procedures needed is pivotal. An electronic witnessing system (EWS), which showed a significant value in decreasing mismatch occurrence and increasing detection possibilities during standard care IVF, still does not guarantee the same level of efficiency during PGD/PGS cycles. Specifically, EWS cannot follow single embryos throughout the procedure. This is however critical when an unambiguous diagnosis corresponds to each embryo. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a proactive method generally adopted to define tools ensuring safety along a procedure. Due to the implementation of a large quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based blastocyst stage PGD/PGS programme in our centre, and to evaluate the potential procedural risks, a FMEA was performed in September 2014. Forty-four failure modes were identified, among which six were given a moderate risk priority number (>15) (RPN; product of estimated occurrence, severity and detection). Specific corrective measures were then introduced and implemented, and a second evaluation performed six months later. The meticulous and careful application of such measures allowed the risks to be decreased along the whole protocol, by reducing their estimated occurrence and/or increasing detection possibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Cimadomo
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy; University of Rome, Sapienza, Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, Istologiche, Medico-Legali e dell'Apparato Locomotore, Sezione Istologia ed Embriologia Medica, via A. Scarpa 16, Rome, Italy.
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy; GENETYX Molecular Genetics Laboratory, via Fermi 1, Marostica, Italy
| | - Antonio Capalbo
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy; GENETYX Molecular Genetics Laboratory, via Fermi 1, Marostica, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy
| | - Catello Scarica
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy; University of Rome, Sapienza, Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, Istologiche, Medico-Legali e dell'Apparato Locomotore, Sezione Istologia ed Embriologia Medica, via A. Scarpa 16, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Romano
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Poggiana
- GENETYX Molecular Genetics Laboratory, via Fermi 1, Marostica, Italy
| | | | - Adriano Giancani
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy; GENETYX Molecular Genetics Laboratory, via Fermi 1, Marostica, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- GENERA centers for reproductive medicine, via G de Notaris 2/b, Rome, Italy; GENETYX Molecular Genetics Laboratory, via Fermi 1, Marostica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Patassini C, Dusi L, Sanges F, Buffo L, Venturella R, Rienzi L. Consistent and reproducible outcomes of blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening across different biopsy practitioners: a multicentre study involving 2586 embryo biopsies. Hum Reprod 2015; 31:199-208. [PMID: 26637492 PMCID: PMC4677968 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is blastocyst biopsy and quantitative real-time PCR based comprehensive chromosome screening a consistent and reproducible approach across different biopsy practitioners? SUMMARY ANSWER The blastocyst biopsy approach provides highly consistent and reproducible laboratory and clinical outcomes across multiple practitioners from different IVF centres when all of the embryologists received identical training and use similar equipment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Recently there has been a trend towards trophectoderm (TE) biopsy in preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)/preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) programmes. However, there is still a lack of knowledge about the reproducibility that can be obtained from multiple biopsy practitioners in different IVF centres in relation also to blastocysts of different morphology. Although it has been demonstrated that biopsy at the blastocyst stage has no impact on embryo viability, it remains a possibility that less experienced individual biopsy practitioners or laboratories performing TE biopsy may affect certain outcomes. We investigated whether TE biopsy practitioners can have an impact on the quality of the genetic test and the subsequent clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This longitudinal cohort study, between April 2013 and December 2014, involved 2586 consecutive blastocyst biopsies performed at three different IVF centres and the analysis of 494 single frozen euploid embryo transfer cycles (FEET). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Seven biopsy practitioners performed the blastocyst biopsies in the study period and quantitative PCR was used for comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS). The same practitioner performed both the biopsy and tubing procedures for each blastocyst they biopsied. To investigate the quality of the biopsied samples, the diagnostic rate, sample-specific concurrence and the cell number retrieved in the biopsy were evaluated for each biopsy operator. Clinical outcomes following FEET cycles were stratified by biopsy operator and compared. Cellularity of the biopsy sample was also correlated with clinical outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The seven practitioners performed 2586 biopsies, five in centre IVF-1 and one in each of the other two IVF centres (IVF-2 and IVF-3). Overall, 2437 out of 2586 (94.2%) blastocyst biopsies resulted in a conclusive diagnosis, 119 (4.6%) showed a nonconcurrent result and 30 (1.2%) failed to amplify, suggesting the absence of TE cells in the test tube or presence of degenerated/lysed cells only. Among the samples producing a conclusive diagnosis, a mean concurrence value of 0.253 (95% CI = 0.250–0.257) was observed. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors showed no differences in the diagnosis rate and in the concurrence of the genetic analysis between different biopsy practitioners. An overall mean number of 7.32 cells (95% CI = 6.82–7.81; range 2–15) were predicted from all biopsies. Higher cellularity was significantly associated with a better quality of the CCS diagnosis (P < 0.01) and with the conclusive diagnosis rate, with nonconcurrent samples showing significantly lower numbers of cells (2.1; 95% CI=1.5–2.7) compared with samples resulting in a conclusive diagnosis (mean cells number 7.5; 95% CI = 7.1–7.9, P < 0.01). However, no differences were recorded between different biopsy practitioners regarding cellularity of the biopsy. Finally, logistic analysis showed no impact of the biopsy practitioners on the observed ongoing rates of implantation, biochemical pregnancy loss and miscarriage after the FEET cycles. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION These data come from a restricted set of laboratories where all of the embryologists received identical training and use identical equipment. A single TE biopsy method and CCS technology was used and these data particularly apply to PGS programmes using blastocyst biopsy without zona opening at the cleavage stage and using qPCR-based CCS. To make firm conclusions on the potential impact of biopsy on biochemical pregnancy loss and miscarriages according to practitioner and biopsy cellularity, a larger sample size is needed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS We reported a very high consistency and reproducibility of the blastocyst biopsy approach coupled with qPCR-based CSS for both genetic and clinical outcomes across different practitioners working in different IVF centres when appropriate training is provided and when the same laboratory setting is used. These data are important considering the trend towards the use of blastocyst biopsy worldwide for PGD/PGS applications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Capalbo
- GENERA Roma, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy GENETYX, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Marostica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- GENERA Roma, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy GENERA Marostica, Poliambulatorio SALUS, Marostica, Italy GENERA Napoli, Clinica Ruesch, Napoli, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- GENERA Roma, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy GENETYX, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Marostica, Vicenza, Italy
| | | | | | - Ludovica Dusi
- GENERA Marostica, Poliambulatorio SALUS, Marostica, Italy
| | | | - Laura Buffo
- GENERA Marostica, Poliambulatorio SALUS, Marostica, Italy
| | | | - Laura Rienzi
- GENERA Roma, Clinica Valle Giulia, Roma, Italy GENERA Marostica, Poliambulatorio SALUS, Marostica, Italy GENERA Napoli, Clinica Ruesch, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rienzi L, Bariani F, Dalla Zorza M, Romano S, Scarica C, Maggiulli R, Nanni Costa A, Ubaldi FM. Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 31:516-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Revised: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 06/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
36
|
Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Colamaria S, Ferrero S, Maggiulli R, Vajta G, Sapienza F, Cimadomo D, Giuliani M, Gravotta E, Vaiarelli A, Rienzi L. Reduction of multiple pregnancies in the advanced maternal age population after implementation of an elective single embryo transfer policy coupled with enhanced embryo selection: pre- and post-intervention study. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:2097-106. [PMID: 26150408 PMCID: PMC4542718 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is an elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) policy an efficient approach for women aged >35 years when embryo selection is enhanced via blastocyst culture and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? SUMMARY ANSWER Elective SET coupled with enhanced embryo selection using PGS in women older than 35 years reduced the multiple pregnancy rates while maintaining the cumulative success rate of the IVF programme. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Multiple pregnancies mean an increased risk of premature birth and perinatal death and occur mainly in older patients when multiple embryos are transferred to increase the chance of pregnancy. A SET policy is usually recommended in cases of good prognosis patients, but no general consensus has been reached for SET application in the advanced maternal age (AMA) population, defined as women older than 35 years. Our objective was to evaluate the results in terms of efficacy, efficiency and safety of an eSET policy coupled with increased application of blastocyst culture and PGS for this population of patients in our IVF programme. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In January 2013, a multidisciplinary intervention involving optimization of embryo selection procedure and introduction of an eSET policy in an AMA population of women was implemented. This is a retrospective 4-year (January 2010–December 2013) pre- and post-intervention analysis, including 1161 and 499 patients in the pre- and post-intervention period, respectively. The primary outcome measures were the cumulative delivery rate (DR) per oocyte retrieval cycle and multiple DR. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Surplus oocytes and/or embryos were vitrified during the entire study period. In the post-intervention period, all couples with good quality embryos and less than two previous implantation failures were offered eSET. Embryo selection was enhanced by blastocyst culture and PGS (blastocyst stage biopsy and 24-chromosomal screening). Elective SET was also applied in cryopreservation cycles. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Patient and cycle characteristics were similar in the pre- and post-intervention groups [mean (SD) female age: 39.6 ± 2.1 and 39.4 ± 2.2 years; range 36–44] as assessed by logistic regression. A total of 1609 versus 574 oocyte retrievals, 937 versus 350 embryo warming and 138 versus 27 oocyte warming cycles were performed in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively, resulting in 1854 and 508 embryo transfers, respectively. In the post-intervention period, 289 cycles were blastocyst stage with (n = 182) or without PGS (n = 107). A mean (SD) number of 2.9 ± 1.1 (range 1–4) and 1.4 ± 0.8 (range 1–3) embryos were transferred pre- and post-intervention, respectively (P < 0.01) and similar cumulative clinical pregnancy rates per transfer and per cycle were obtained: 26.8, 30.9% and 29.7, 26.3%, respectively. The total DR per oocyte retrieval cycle (21.0 and 20.4% pre- and post-intervention, respectively) defined as efficacy was not affected by the intervention [odds ratio (OR) = 0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7–1.1; P = 0.23]. However, a significantly increased live birth rate per transferred embryo (defined as efficiency) was observed in the post-intervention group 17.0 versus 10.6% (P < 0.01). Multiple DRs decreased from 21.0 in the preintervention to 6.8% in the post-intervention group (OR = 0.3. 95% CI = 0.1–0.7; P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION In this study, the suitability of SET was assessed in individual women on the basis of both clinical and embryological prognostic factors and was not standardized. For the described eSET strategy coupled with an enhanced embryo selection policy, an optimized culture system, cryopreservation and aneuploidy screening programme is necessary. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Owing to the increased maternal morbidity and perinatal complications related to multiple pregnancies, it is recommended to extend the eSET policy to the AMA population. As shown in this study, enhanced embryo selection procedures might allow a reduction in the number of embryos transferred and the number of transfers to be performed without affecting the total efficacy of the treatment but increasing efficiency and safety. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Capalbo
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy GENETYX, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, E. Fermi, 1 36063 Marostica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Silvia Colamaria
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Susanna Ferrero
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Maggiulli
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Gábor Vajta
- Beishan Industrial Zone, BGI Shenzhen, Yantian District Shenzhen 518083, China
| | - Fabio Sapienza
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy GENETYX, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, E. Fermi, 1 36063 Marostica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Maddalena Giuliani
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrica Gravotta
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Vaiarelli
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. De Notaris 2b, 00197 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1173-81. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 306] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
38
|
Gandhi G, Allahbadia G, Kagalwala S, Allahbadia A, Ramesh S, Patel K, Hinduja R, Chipkar V, Madne M, Ramani R, Joo JK, Jeung JE, Go KR, Lee KS, Goto H, Hashimoto S, Amo A, Yamochi T, Iwata H, Morimoto Y, Koifman M, Lahav-Baratz S, Blais E, Megnazi-Wiener Z, Ishai D, Auslender R, Dirnfeld M, Zaletova V, Zakharova E, Krivokharchenko I, Zaletov S, Zhu L, Li Y, Zhang H, Ai J, Jin L, Zhang X, Rajan N, Kovacs A, Foley C, Flanagan J, O'Callaghan J, Waterstone J, Dineen T, Dahdouh EM, St-Michel P, Granger L, Carranza-Mamane B, Faruqi F, Kattygnarath TV, Gomes FLAF, Christoforidis N, Ioakimidou C, Papas C, Moisidou M, Chatziparasidou A, Klaver M, Tilleman K, De Sutter P, Lammers J, Freour T, Splingart C, Barriere P, Ikeno T, Nakajyo Y, Sato Y, Hirata K, Kyoya T, Kyono K, Campos FB, Meseguer M, Nogales M, Martinez E, Ariza M, Agudo D, Rodrigo L, Garcia-Velasco JA, Lopes AS, Frederickx V, Vankerkhoven G, Serneels A, Roziers P, Puttermans P, Campo R, Gordts S, Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Wells D, Liss J, Lukaszuk K, Glowacka J, Bruszczynska A, Gallego SC, Lopez LO, Vila EO, Garcia MG, Canas CL, Segovia AG, Ponce AG, Calonge RN, Peregrin PC, Hashimoto S, Amo A, Ito K, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y, Alcoba DD, Valerio EG, Conzatti M, Tornquist J, Kussler AP, Pimentel AM, Corleta HE, Brum IS, Boyer P, Montjean D, Tourame P, Gervoise-Boyer M, Cohen J, Lefevre B, Radio CI, Wolf JP, Ziyyat A, De Croo I, Tolpe A, Degheselle S, Van de Velde A, Tilleman K, De Sutter P, Van den Abbeel E, Kagalwala S, Gandhi G, Allahbadia G, Kuwayama M, Allahbadia A, Chipkar V, Khatoon A, Ramani R, Madne M, Alsule S, Inaba M, Ohgaki A, Ohtani A, Matsumoto H, Mizuno S, Mori R, Fukuda A, Morimoto Y, Umekawa Y, Yoshida A, Tanigiwa S, Seida K, Suzuki H, Tanaka M, Vahabi Z, Yazdi PE, Dalman A, Ebrahimi B, Mostafaei F, Niknam MR, Watanabe S, Kamihata M, Tanaka T, Matsunaga R, Yamanaka N, Kani C, Ishikawa T, Wada T, Morita H, Miyamura H, Nishio E, Ito M, Kuwahata A, Ochi M, Horiuchi T, Dal Canto M, Guglielmo MC, Fadini R, Renzini MM, Albertini DF, Novara P, Lain M, Brambillasca F, Turchi D, Sottocornola M, Coticchio G, Kato M, Fukunaga N, Nagai R, Kitasaka H, Yoshimura T, Tamura F, Hasegawa N, Nakayama K, Takeuchi M, Ohno H, Aoyagi N, Kojima E, Itoi F, Hashiba Y, Asada Y, Kikuchi H, Iwasa Y, Kamono T, Suzuki A, Yamada K, Kanno H, Sasaki K, Murakawa H, Matsubara M, Yoshida H, Valdespin C, Elhelaly M, Chen P, Pangestu M, Catt S, Hojnik N, Kovacic B, Roglic P, Taborin M, Zafosnik M, Knez J, Vlaisavljevic V, Mori C, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, Takayama Y, Aono F, Kato K, Radwan P, Krasinski R, Chorobik K, Radwan M, Stoppa M, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Ievoli E, Dovere L, Scarica C, Albricci L, Romano S, Sanges F, Barnocchi N, Papini L, Vivarelli A, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Rienzi L, Bono S, Capalbo A, Spizzichino L, Rubio C, Ubaldi FM, Fiorentino F, Ferris J, Favetta LA, MacLusky N, King WA, Madani T, Jahangiri N, Aflatoonian R, Cater E, Hulme D, Berrisford K, Jenner L, Campbell A, Fishel S, Zhang XY, Yilmaz A, Hananel H, Ao A, Vutyavanich T, Piromlertamorn W, Saenganan U, Samchimchom S, Wirleitner B, Lejeune B, Zech NH, Vanderzwalmen P, Albani E, Parini V, Smeraldi A, Menduni F, Antonacci R, Marras A, Levi S, Morreale G, Pisano B, Di Biase A, Di Rosa A, Setti PEL, Puard V, Cadoret V, Tranchant T, Gauthier C, Reiter E, Guerif F, Royere D, Yoon SY, Eum JH, Park EA, Kim TY, Yoon TK, Lee DR, Lee WS, Cabal AC, Vallejo B, Campos P, Sanchez E, Serrano J, Remohi J, Nagornyy V, Mazur P, Mykytenko D, Semeniuk L, Zukin V, Guilherme P, Madaschi C, Bonetti TCS, Fassolas G, Izzo CR, Santos MJDL, Beltran D, Garcia-Laez V, Escriba MJ, Grau N, Escrich L, Albert C, Zuzuarregui JL, Pellicer A, LU Y, Nikiforaki D, Meerschaut FV, Neupane J, De Vos WH, Lierman S, Deroo T, Heindryckx B, De Sutter P, Li J, Chen XY, Lin G, Huang GN, Sun ZY, Zhong Y, Zhang B, Li T, Zhang SP, Ye H, Han SB, Liu SY, Zhou J, Lu GX, Zhuang GL, Muela L, Roldan M, Gadea B, Martinez M, Perez I, Meseguer M, Munoz M, Castello C, Asensio M, Fernandez P, Farreras A, Rovira S, Capdevila JM, Velilla E, Lopez-Teijon M, Kovacs P, Matyas SZ, Forgacs V, Reichart A, Rarosi F, Bernard A, Torok A, Kaali SG, Sajgo A, Pribenszky CS, Sozen B, Ozturk S, Yaba-Ucar A, Demir N, Gelo N, Stanic P, Hlavati V, ogoric S, Pavicic-Baldani D, prem-Goldtajn M, Radakovic B, Kasum M, Strelec M, Canic T, imunic V, Vrcic H, Ajina M, Negra D, Ben-Ali H, Jallad S, Zidi I, Meddeb S, Bibi M, Khairi H, Saad A, Escrich L, Grau N, Meseguer M, Gamiz P, Viloria T, Escriba MJ, Lima ET, Fernandez MP, Prieto JAA, Varela MO, Kassa D, Munoz EM, Morita H, Watanabe S, Kamihata M, Matsunaga R, Wada T, Kani K, Ishikawa T, Miyamura H, Ito M, Kuwahata A, Ochi M, Horiuchi T, Nor-Ashikin MNK, Norhazlin JMY, Norita S, Wan-Hafizah WJ, Mohd-Fazirul M, Razif D, Hoh BP, Dale S, Cater E, Woodhead G, Jenner L, Fishel S, Andronikou S, Francis G, Tailor S, Vourliotis M, Almeida PA, Krivega M, Van de Velde H, Lee RK, Hwu YM, Lu CH, Li SH, Vaiarelli A, Antonacci R, Smeraldi A, Desgro M, Albani E, Baggiani A, Zannoni E, Setti PEL, Kermavner LB, Klun IV, Pinter B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, De Paepe C, Cauffman G, Verheyen G, Stoop D, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H, Stecher A, Wirleitner B, Vanderzwalmen P, Zintz M, Neyer A, Bach M, Baramsai B, Schwerda D, Zech NH, Wiener-Megnazi Z, Fridman M, Koifman M, Lahav-Baratz S, Blais I, Auslender R, Dirnfeld M, Akerud H, Lindgren K, Karehed K, Wanggren K, Hreinsson J, Rovira S, Capdevila JM, Freijomil B, Castello C, Farreras A, Fernandez P, Asensio M, Lopez-Teijon M, Velilla E, Weiss A, Neril R, Geslevich J, Beck-Fruchter R, Lavee M, Golan J, Ermoshkin A, Shalev E, Shi W, Zhang S, Zhao W, Xue XIA, Wang MIN, Bai H, Shi J, Smith HL, Shaw L, Kimber S, Brison D, Boumela I, Assou S, Haouzi D, Ahmed OA, Dechaud H, Hamamah S, Dasiman R, Nor-Shahida AR, Wan-Hafizah WJ, Norhazlin JMY, Mohd-Fazirul M, Salina O, Gabriele RAF, Nor-Ashikin MNK, Ben-Yosef D, Shwartz T, Cohen T, Carmon A, Raz NM, Malcov M, Frumkin T, Almog B, Vagman I, Kapustiansky R, Reches A, Azem F, Amit A, Cetinkaya M, Pirkevi C, Yelke H, Kumtepe Y, Atayurt Z, Kahraman S, Risco R, Hebles M, Saa AM, Vilches-Ferron MA, Sanchez-Martin P, Lucena E, Lucena M, Heras MDL, Agirregoikoa JA, Martinez E, Barrenetxea G, De Pablo JL, Lehner A, Pribenszky C, Murber A, Rigo J, Urbancsek J, Fancsovits P, Bano DG, Sanchez-Leon A, Marcos J, Molla M, Amorocho B, Nicolas M, Fernandez L, Landeras J, Adeniyi OA, Ehbish SM, Brison DR, Egashira A, Murakami M, Nagafuchi E, Tanaka K, Tomohara A, Mine C, Otsubo H, Nakashima A, Otsuka M, Yoshioka N, Kuramoto T, Choi D, Yang H, Park JH, Jung JH, Hwang HG, Lee JH, Lee JE, Kang AS, Yoo JH, Kwon HC, Lee SJ, Bang S, Shin H, Lim HJ, Min SH, Yeon JY, Koo DB, Kuwayama M, Higo S, Ruvalcaba L, Kobayashi M, Takeuchi T, Yoshida A, Miwa A, Nagai Y, Momma Y, Takahashi K, Chuko M, Nagai A, Otsuki J, Kim SG, Lee JH, Kim YY, Kim HJ, Park IH, Sun HG, Lee KH, Song HJ, Costa-Borges N, Belles M, Herreros J, Teruel J, Ballesteros A, Pellicer A, Calderon G, Nikiforaki D, Vossaert L, Meerschaut FV, Qian C, Lu Y, Parys JB, De Vos WH, Deforce D, Deroo T, Van den Abbeel E, Leybaert L, Heindryckx B, De Sutter P, Surlan L, Otasevic V, Velickovic K, Golic I, Vucetic M, Stankovic V, Stojnic J, Radunovic N, Tulic I, Korac B, Korac A, Fancsovits P, Pribenszky C, Lehner A, Murber A, Rigo J, Urbancsek J, Elias R, Neri QV, Fields T, Schlegel PN, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD, Gilson A, Piront N, Heens B, Vastersaegher C, Vansteenbrugge A, Pauwels PCP, Abdel-Raheem MF, Abdel-Rahman MY, Abdel-Gaffar HM, Sabry M, Kasem H, Rasheed SM, Amin M, Abdelmonem A, Ait-Allah AS, VerMilyea M, Anthony J, Bucci J, Croly S, Coutifaris C, Maggiulli R, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Dusi L, Colamaria S, Baroni E, Giuliani M, Vaiarelli A, Sapienza F, Buffo L, Ubaldi FM, Zivi E, Aizenman E, Barash D, Gibson D, Shufaro Y, Perez M, Aguilar J, Taboas E, Ojeda M, Suarez L, Munoz E, Casciani V, Minasi MG, Scarselli F, Terribile M, Zavaglia D, Colasante A, Franco G, Greco E, Hickman C, Cook C, Gwinnett D, Trew G, Carby A, Lavery S, Asgari L, Paouneskou D, Jayaprakasan K, Maalouf W, Campbell BK, Aguilar J, Taboas E, Perez M, Munoz E, Ojeda M, Remohi J, Rega E, Alteri A, Cotarelo RP, Rubino P, Colicchia A, Giannini P, Devjak R, Papler TB, Tacer KF, Verdenik I, Scarica C, Ubaldi FM, Stoppa M, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Ievoli E, Dovere L, Albricci L, Romano S, Sanges F, Vaiarelli A, Iussig B, Gala A, Ferrieres A, Assou S, Vincens C, Bringer-Deutsch S, Brunet C, Hamamah S, Conaghan J, Tan L, Gvakharia M, Ivani K, Chen A, Pera RR, Bowman N, Montgomery S, Best L, Campbell A, Duffy S, Fishel S, Hirata R, Aoi Y, Habara T, Hayashi N, Dinopoulou V, Partsinevelos GA, Bletsa R, Mavrogianni D, Anagnostou E, Stefanidis K, Drakakis P, Loutradis D, Hernandez J, Leon CL, Puopolo M, Palumbo A, Atig F, Kerkeni A, Saad A, Ajina M, D'Ommar G, Herrera AK, Lozano L, Majerfeld M, Ye Z, Zaninovic N, Clarke R, Bodine R, Rosenwaks Z, Mazur P, Nagorny V, Mykytenko D, Semeniuk L, Zukin V, Zabala A, Pessino T, Outeda S, Blanco L, Leocata F, Asch R, Wan-Hafizah WJ, Rajikin MH, Nuraliza AS, Mohd-Fazirul M, Norhazlin JMY, Razif D, Nor-Ashikin MNK, Machac S, Hubinka V, Larman M, Koudelka M, Budak TP, Membrado OO, Martinez ES, Wilson P, McClure A, Nargund G, Raso D, Insua MF, Lotti B, Giordana S, Baldi C, Barattini J, Cogorno M, Peri NF, Neuspiller F, Resta S, Filannino A, Maggi E, Cafueri G, Ferraretti AP, Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Sioga A, Oikonomou Z, Chatzimeletiou K, Oikonomou L, Kolibianakis E, Tarlatzis BC, Sarkar MR, Ray D, Bhattacharya J, Alises JM, Gumbao D, Sanchez-Leon A, Amorocho B, Molla M, Nicolas M, Fernandez L, Landeras J, Duffy S, Campbell A, Montgomery S, Hickman CFL, Fishel S, Fiorentino I, Gualtieri R, Barbato V, Braun S, Mollo V, Netti P, Talevi R, Bayram A, Findikli N, Serdarogullari M, Sahin O, Ulug U, Tosun SB, Bahceci M, Leon AS, Gumbao D, Marcos J, Molla M, Amorocho B, Nicolas M, Fernandez L, Landeras J, Cardoso MCA, Aguiar APS, Sartorio C, Evangelista A, Gallo-Sa P, Erthal-Martins MC, Mantikou E, Jonker MJ, de Jong M, Wong KM, van Montfoort APA, Breit TM, Repping S, Mastenbroek S, Power E, Montgomery S, Duffy S, Jordan K, Campbell A, Fishel S, Findikli N, Aksoy T, Gultomruk M, Aktan A, Goktas C, Ulug U, Bahceci M, Petracco R, Okada L, Azambuja R, Badalotti F, Michelon J, Reig V, Kvitko D, Tagliani-Ribeiro A, Badalotti M, Petracco A, Pirkevi C, Cetinkaya M, Yelke H, Kumtepe Y, Atayurt Z, Kahraman S, Aydin B, Cepni I, Serdarogullari M, Findikli N, Bayram A, Goktas C, Sahin O, Ulug U, Bahceci M, Rodriguez-Arnedo D, Ten J, Guerrero J, Ochando I, Perez M, Bernabeu R, Okada L, Petracco R, Azambuja R, Badalotti F, Michelon J, Reig V, Tagliani-Ribeiro A, Kvitko D, Badalotti M, Petracco A, Reig V, Kvitko D, Tagliani-Ribeiro A, Okada L, Azambuja R, Petracco R, Michelon J, Badalotti F, Petracco A, Badalotti M. Embryology. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
39
|
Thornhill A, Dibouni ZA, Shah T, Wheat S, Teitelbaum M, Walker M, Bissonette F, Yuzpe AL, Leveille MC, Gysler M, Johnson M, Sprague A, Villena JG, Aparicio JL, Gimenez J, Ten J, Perez RB, Scholten I, Chambers GM, van Loendersloot L, van der Veen F, Repping S, Gianotten J, Hompes PGA, Ledger W, Mol BWJ, Dior UP, Laufer N, Granovsky-Grisaru S, Yagel S, Yaffe H, Gielchinsky Y, Nelen WLDM, Huppelschoten AG, Verkerk EW, Adang EMM, Kremer JAM, Davies M, Rumbold A, Marino J, Willson K, Moore V, Giles L, Shebl O, Ebner T, Tews G, Haas D, Oppelt P, Mayer RB, Sanges F, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, Romano S, Scarica C, Schimberni M, Giallonardo A, Vettraino G, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Figueira RCS, Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Obrado EC, Barredo DR, Navarro LL, Rodriguez AV, Rague PNB, Lletget BC, Padro RT, Oron G, Sokal-Arnon T, Zeadna A, Son WY, Holzer H, Tulandi T, Nakamura Y, Hattori H, Sato Y, Kuchiki M, Sakamoto E, Doshida M, Toya M, Kyono K, Nakajo Y, Nakamura Y, Hirata K, Doshida M, Toya M, Kyono K, Xin ZM, Zhu H, Sun YP, Jin HX, Song WY, Rodriguez A, Poisot F, Rodriguez F, Coll O, Vassena R, Vernaeve V, Ye Y, Wang L, Wang N, Le F, Jin F, Zheng Y, Jin F, Lou Y, Le F, Pan PP, Wang N, Wang LY, Hu CX, Liu SY, Zheng YM, Li LJ, Liu XZ, Xu XR, Huang HF, Jin F, Lin SL, Li M, Lian Y, Chen LX, Liu P, Kawwass JF, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Boulet S, Jamieson DJ. Quality and safety of ART therapies. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
40
|
Delbaere A, Laruelle C, Place I, Devreker F, Englert Y, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Colamaria S, Giuliani M, Baroni E, Sapienza F, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Yildiz G, Candan ZN, Avcil F, Ozden H, Uslu H, Karaman Y, Duarte Filho OB, Busso CE, Tso LO, Mizrahi FE, Antunes Junior N, Tognotti E, Busso NE, Soares JB, Knez J, Kovacic B, Reljic M, Gavric-Lovrec V, Kovac V, Vlaisavljevic V. SESSION 47: ART - IMPACT OF LEGISLATION. Hum Reprod 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/27.s2.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
41
|
Furia GU, Kostelijk EH, Vergouw CG, Lee H, Lee S, Park D, Kang H, Lim C, Yang K, Lee S, Lim C, Park Y, Shin M, Yang K, Lee H, Beyhan Z, Fisch JD, Sher G, Keskintepe L, VerMilyea MD, Anthony JT, Graham JR, Tucker MJ, Tucker MJ, Freour T, Lattes S, Lammers J, Mansour W, Jean M, Barriere P, El Danasouri I, Gagsteiger F, Rinaldi L, Selman H, Antonova I, Milachich T, Valkova L, Shterev A, Barcroft J, Dayoub N, Thong J, Abdel Reda H, Khalaf Y, El Touky T, Cabry R, Brzakowski R, Lourdel E, Brasseur F, Copin H, Merviel P, Yamada M, Takanashi K, Hamatani T, Akutsu H, Fukunaga T, Inoue O, Ogawa S, Sugawara K, Okumura N, Chikazawa N, Kuji N, Umezawa A, Tomita M, Yoshimura Y, Van der Jeught M, Ghimire S, O'Leary T, Lierman S, Deforce D, Chuva de Sousa Lopes S, Heindryckx B, De Sutter P, Herrero J, Tejera A, De los Santos MJ, Castello D, Romero JL, Meseguer M, Barriere P, Lammers J, Lattes S, Leperlier F, Mirallie S, Jean M, Freour T, Schats R, Al-Nofal M, Vergouw CG, Lens JW, Rooth H, Kostelijk EH, Hompes PG, Lambalk CB, Hreinsson J, Karlstrom PO, Wanggren K, Lundqvist M, Vahabi Z, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Dalman A, Ebrahimi B, Daneshzadeh MT, Rajabpour Niknam M, Choi EG, Rho YH, Oh DS, Park LS, Cheon HS, Lee CS, Kong IK, Lee SC, Liebenthron J, Montag M, Koster M, Toth B, Reinsberg J, van der Ven H, Strowitzki T, Morita H, Hirosawa T, Watanabe S, Wada T, Kamihata M, Kuwahata A, Ochi M, Horiuchi T, Fatemeh H, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Fazel M, Fouladi H, Johansson L, Ruttanajit T, Chanchamroen S, Sopaboon P, Seweewanlop S, Sawakwongpra K, Jindasri P, Jantanalapruek T, Charoonchip K, Vajta G, Quangkananurug W, Yi G, Jo JW, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH, Zhang Y, Zhao HJ, Cui YG, Gao C, Gao LL, Liu JY, Sozen E, Buluc B, Vicdan K, Akarsu C, Tuncay G, Hambiliki F, Bungum M, Agapitou K, Makrakis E, Liarmakopoulou S, Anagnostopoulou C, Moustakarias T, Giannaris D, Wang J, Andonov M, Linara E, Charleson C, Ahuja KK, Ozsoy S, Morris MB, Day ML, Cobo A, Castello D, Viloria T, Campos P, Vallejo B, Remohi J, Roldan M, Perez-Cano I, Cruz M, Martinez M, Gadea B, Munoz M, Garrido N, Meseguer M, Mesut N, Ciray HN, Mesut A, Isler A, Bahceci M, Munoz M, Fortuno S, Legidos V, Muela L, Roldan M, Galindo N, Cruz M, Meseguer M, Gunasheela S, Gunasheela D, Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kondo M, Ito M, Kato K, Takehara Y, Kato O, Edgar DH, Krapez JA, Bacer Kermavner L, Virant-Klun I, Pinter B, Tomazevic T, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Lee SG, Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Lee YC, Lim JH, Bochev I, Valkova L, Kyurkchiev S, Shterev A, Wilding M, Coppola G, Di Matteo L, Dale B, Hormann-Kropfl M, Kastelic D, Montag M, Schenk M, Fourati Ben Mustapha S, Khrouf M, Braham M, Kallel L, Elloumi H, Merdassi G, Chaker A, Ben Meftah M, Zhioua F, Zhioua A, Kocent J, Neri QV, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD, Best L, Campbell A, Fishel S, Calimlioglu N, Sahin G, Akdogan A, Susamci T, Bilgin M, Goker ENT, Tavmergen E, Cantatore C, Ding J, Depalo R, Smith GD, Kasapi E, Panagiotidis Y, Papatheodorou A, Goudakou M, Pasadaki T, Nikolettos N, Asimakopoulos B, Prapas Y, Soydan E, Gulebenzer G, Karatekelioglu E, Budak E, Pehlivan Budak T, Alegretti J, Cuzzi J, Negrao PM, Moraes MP, Bueno MB, Serafini P, Motta ELA, Elaimi A, Harper JC, Stecher A, Baborova P, Wirleitner B, Schwerda D, Vanderzwalmen P, Zech NH, Stanic P, Hlavati V, Gelo N, Pavicic-Baldani D, Sprem-Goldstajn M, Radakovic B, Kasum M, Strelec M, Simunic V, Vrcic H, Khan I, Urich M, Abozaid T, Ullah K, Abuzeid M, Fakih M, Shamma N, Ayers J, Ashraf M, Milik S, Pirkevi C, Atayurt Z, Yazici S, Yelke H, Kahraman S, Dal Canto M, Coticchio G, Brambillasca F, Mignini Renzini M, Novara P, Maragno L, Karagouga G, De Ponti E, Fadini R, Resta S, Magli MC, Cavallini G, Muzzonigro F, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Barberi M, Orlando G, Sciajno R, Serrao L, Fava L, Preti S, Bonu MA, Borini A, Varras M, Polonifi A, Mantzourani M, Mavrogianni D, Stefanidis K, Griva T, Bletsa R, Dinopoulou V, Drakakis P, Loutradis D, Campbell A, Hickman CFL, Duffy S, Bowman N, Gardner K, Fishel S, Sati L, Zeiss C, Demir R, McGrath J, Yelke H, Atayurt Z, Yildiz S, Unal S, Kumtepe Y, Kahraman S, Atayurt Z, Yelke H, Unal S, Kumtepe Y, Kahraman S, Aljaser F, Hernandez J, Tomlinson M, Campbell B, Fosas N, Redondo Ania M, Marina F, Molfino F, Martin P, Perez N, Carrasco A, Garcia N, Gonzalez S, Marina S, Redondo Ania M, Marina F, Molfino F, Fosas N, Martin P, Perez N, Carrasco A, Garcia N, Gonzalez S, Marina S, Scaruffi P, Stigliani S, Tonini GP, Venturini PL, Anserini P, Guglielmo MC, Coticchio G, Albertini DF, Dal Canto M, Brambillasca F, Lain M, Caliari I, Mignini Renzini M, Fadini R, Oikonomou Z, Chatzimeletiou K, Sioga A, Oikonomou L, Kolibianakis E, Tarlatzis B, Nottola SA, Bianchi V, Lorenzo C, Maione M, Macchiarelli G, Borini A, Gomez E, Gil MA, Sanchez-Osorio J, Maside C, Martinez MJ, Torres I, Rodenas C, Cuello C, Parrilla I, Molina G, Garcia A, Margineda J, Navarro S, Roca J, Martinez EA, Avcil F, Ozden H, Candan ZN, Uslu H, Karaman Y, Gioacchini G, Giorgini E, Carnevali O, Bianchi V, Ferraris P, Vaccari L, Borini A, Choe S, Tae J, Kim C, Lee J, Hwang D, Kim K, Suh C, Jee B, Ozden H, Candan ZN, Avcil F, Uslu H, Karaman Y, Catt SL, Sorenson H, Vela M, Duric V, Chen P, Temple-Smith PD, Pangestu M, Yoshimura T, Fukunaga N, Nagai R, Kitasaka H, Tamura F, Hasegawa N, Kato M, Nakayama K, Takeuchi M, Aoyagi N, Yasue K, Watanabe H, Asano E, Hashiba Y, Asada Y, Iwata K, Yumoto K, Mizoguchi C, Sargent H, Kai Y, Ueda M, Tsuchie Y, Imajo A, Iba Y, Mio Y, Els-Smit CL, Botha MH, Sousa M, Windt-De Beer M, Kruger TF, Muller N, Magli C, Corani G, Giusti A, Castelletti E, Gambardella L, Gianaroli L, Seshadri S, Sunkara SK, El-Toukhy T, Kishi I, Maruyama T, Ohishi M, Akiba Y, Asada H, Konishi Y, Nakano M, Kamei K, Yoshimura Y, Lee JH, Lee KH, Park IH, Sun HG, Kim SG, Kim YY, Choi EM, Lee DH, Chavez SL, Loewke KE, Behr B, Han J, Moussavi F, Reijo Pera RA, Yokota H, Yokota Y, Yokota M, Sato S, Nakagawa M, Sato M, Anazawa I, Araki Y, Virant-Klun I, Knez K, Pozlep B, Tomazevic T, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Lim JH, Vermilyea MD, Graham JR, Levy MJ, Tucker MJ, Carvalho M, Cordeiro I, Leal F, Aguiar A, Nunes J, Rodrigues C, Soares AP, Sousa S, Calhaz-Jorge C, Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Figueira RCS, Aoki T, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Ozkavukcu S, Sonmezer M, Atabekoglu C, Berker B, Ozmen B, Isbacar S, Ibis E, Menezes J, Lalitkumar PGL, Borg P, Ekwurtzel E, Nordqvist S, Vaegter K, Tristen C, Sjoblom P, Azevedo MC, Figueira RCS, Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Remohi Gimenez J, Cobo A, Castello D, Gamiz P, Albert C, Ferreira RC, Braga DPAF, Figueira RCS, Setti AS, Resende S, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Colturato SS, Braga DPAF, Figueira RCS, Setti AS, Resende S, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Ferrer Buitrago M, Ferrer Robles E, Munoz Soriano P, Ruiz-Jorro M, Calatayud Lliso C, Rawe VY, Wanggren K, Hanrieder J, Hambiliki F, Gulen-Yaldir F, Bergquist J, Stavreus-Evers A, Hreinsson J, Grunskis A, Bazarova A, Dundure I, Fodina V, Brikune J, Lakutins J, Pribenszky C, Cornea M, Reichart A, Uhereczky G, Losonczy E, Ficsor L, Lang Z, Ohgi S, Nakamura C, Hagiwara C, Kawashima M, Yanaihara A, Jones GM, Biba M, Kokkali G, Vaxevanoglou T, Chronopoulou M, Petroutsou K, Sfakianoudis K, Pantos K, Perez-Cano I, Gadea B, Martinez M, Muela L, Cruz M, Galindo N, Munoz M, Garrido N, Romano S, Albricci L, Stoppa M, Cerza C, Sanges F, Fusco S, Capalbo A, Maggiulli R, Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Ulrick J, Kilani S, Chapman M, Losada C, Ortega I, Pacheco A, Bronet F, Aguilar J, Ojeda M, Taboas E, Perez M, Munoz E, Pellicer A, Meseguer M, Boumela I, Assou S, Haouzi D, Monzo C, Dechaud H, Hamamah S, Dechaud H, Boumela I, Assou S, Haouzi D, Monzo C, Hamamah S, Nakaoka Y, Hashimoto S, Amo A, Yamagata K, Nakano T, Akamatsu Y, Mezawa T, Ohnishi Y, Himeno T, Inoue T, Ito K, Morimoto Y. EMBRYOLOGY. Hum Reprod 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/27.s2.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
42
|
Sertyel S, Kolankaya A, Yigit A, Cengiz F, Kunacaf G, Akman MA, Gurgan T, Yu B, DeCherney A, Segars J, Russanova V, Howard B, Serafini P, Kimati C, Hassun P, Cuzzi J, Peres M, Riboldi M, Gomes C, Fettback P, Alegretti J, motta E, Lappa C, Ottolini CS, Summers MC, Sage K, Rogers S, Griffin DK, Handyside AH, Thornhill AR, Ubaldi F, Capalbo A, Wright G, Elliott T, Maggiulli R, Rienzi L, Nagy ZP, Cinar Yapan C, Beyazyurek C, Ekmekci CG, Altin G, Yesil M, Yelke H, Kahraman S, Khalil M, Rittenberg V, Khalaf Y, El-toukhy T, Alvaro Mercadal B, Imbert R, Demeestere I, De Leener A, Englert Y, Costagliola S, Delbaere A, Zimmermann B, Ryan A, Baner J, Gemelos G, Dodd M, Rabinowitz M, Hill M, Sandalinas M, Garcia-Guixe E, Jimenez-Macedo A, Gimenez C, Hill M, Wemmer N, Potter D, Keller J, Gemelos G, Rabinowitz M, Cater E, Lynch C, Jenner L, Berrisford K, Campbell A, Keown N, Rouse H, Craig A, Fishel S, Palomares AR, Lendinez Ramirez AM, Martinez F, Ruiz Galdon M, Reyes Engel A, Mamas T, Xanthopoulou L, Heath C, Doshi A, Serhal P, SenGupta SB, Plaza S, Templin C, Saguet F, Claustres M, Girardet A, Rienzi L, Biricik A, Capalbo A, Colamaria S, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Ubaldi F, Fiorentino F, Hassun P, Alegretti JR, Kimati C, Barros B, Riboldi M, Cuzzi J, Motta ELA, Serafini P, Tulay P, Naja RP, Cascales-Roman O, Cawood S, Doshi A, Serhal P, SenGupta SB, Montjean D, Ravel C, Belloc S, Cohen-Bacrie P, Bashamboo A, McElreavey K, Benkhalifa M, Filippini G, Radovanovic J, Spalvieri S, Marabella D, Timperi P, Suter T, Jemec M, Traversa M, Marshall J, Leigh D, McArthur S, Zhang L, Yilmaz A, Zhang XY, Son WY, Holzer H, Ao A, Horcajadas JA, Munne S, Fisher J, Ketterson K, Wells D, Bisignano A, Rubio C, Mateu E, Milan M, Mercader A, Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A, Mercader A, Garrido N, Rubio C, Buendia P, Delgado A, Escrich L, Poo ME, Simon C, Held K, Baukloh V, Arps S, Wittmann ST, Petrussa L, Van de Velde H, De Rycke M, Beyazyurek C, Ekmekci CG, Ajredin N, Cinar Yapan C, Tac HA, Yelke HK, Altin G, Kahraman S, Basile N, Bronet F, Nogales MC, Ariza M, Martinez E, Linan A, Gaytan A, Meseguer M, Christopikou D, Tsorva E, Economou K, Davies S, Mastrominas M, Handyside AH, Avo Santos M, M. Lens S, C. Fauser B, S. E. Laven J, B. Baart E, Nakano T, Akamatsu Y, Sato M, Hashimoto S, Maezawa T, Himeno T, Ohnishi Y, Inoue T, Ito K, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y, Al Sharif J, Alhalabi M, Abou Alchamat G, Madania A, Khatib A, Kinj M, Monem F, Mahayri Z, Ajlouni A, Othman A, Chung JT, Son WY, Zhang XY, Ao A, Tan SL, Holzer H, Burnik Papler T, Fon Tacer K, Devjak R, Juvan P, Virant-Klun I, Vrtacnik Bokal E, Zheng HY, Chen SL, Chen X, Tang Y, Li L, Ye DS, Yang XH, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Trapphoff T, Hastreiter S, Haaf T, Asada H, Maekawa R, Tamura I, Tamura H, Sugino N, Zakharova E, Zaletova V, Krivokharchenko I, Ata B, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Glassner M, Opsahl M, Tan SL, Munne S. REPRODUCTIVE (EPI) GENETICS. Hum Reprod 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/27.s2.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
43
|
Colls P, Fischer J, Escudero T, Ketterson K, Harton G, Munne S, Capalbo A, Fiorentino F, Maggiulli R, Romano S, Borsatti A, Joseph A, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Colamaria S, Ubaldi MF, Rienzi LF, Rubino P, Arizzi L, Minasi MG, Pena R, Scarselli F, Casciani V, Colasante A, Ferrero S, Litwicka K, Varricchio MT, Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Cucinelli F, Nagy ZP, Greco E, Beyazyurek C, Ekmekci CG, Tac HA, Ajredin N, Yelke H, Kahraman S, De Rademaeker M, Moutou C, Van Rij M, Dreesen J, De Rycke M, Liebaers I, Viville S, Geraedts J, De Die C, Wells D, Fragouli E, Colls P, Alfarawati S, Munne S, Kashevarova A, Tolmacheva E, Sukhanova N, Lebedev I. SELECTED ORAL COMMUNICATION SESSION, SESSION 63: PREIMPLANTATION GENETICS Wednesday 6 July 2011 10:00 - 11:45. Hum Reprod 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/26.s1.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
44
|
Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Buccheri M, Maggiulli R, Sapienza F, Romano S, Colamaria S, Iussig B, Giuliani M, Palagiano A, Ubaldi F. The worldwide frozen embryo reservoir: methodologies to achieve optimal results. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011; 1221:32-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05931.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
Abstract
The refinement of gamete micromanipulation techniques has made conception possible for couples with male factor infertility who otherwise would remain childless. Moreover, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has ensured that such refractory cases can now generate offspring as successfully as in couples that merely require in vitro insemination. However, despite the now sterling record of ICSI it does not assure a successful outcome for every patient. This can be due, for instance, to the inability of the spermatozoon to activate the oocyte, and applies obviously in cases where spermatozoa are absent from the ejaculate or testicular biopsy. In the present paper we describe in detail the reasons for such failure and review the options that may help overcome it. In particular, we outline the treatment protocol for the situation in which spermatozoa are unable to induce oocyte activation. Further, we report on the clinical outcome achieved with spermatozoa retrieved from the testis, and in cases of extreme oligozoospermia we also explore the option of replicating a single spermatozoon while gaining information on its genomic content. For the most extreme situation in which men have no identifiable germ cells, we will discuss the current status of efforts to accomplish neo-gametogenesis through embryonic stem cell differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Maggiulli
- The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Crippa A, Magli MC, Robles F, Capoti A, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Gallina A, Bonaparte E, Moretti M, Colpi GM, Nerva F, Contalbi G, Vacalluzzo L, Tabano S, Grati FR, Gazzano G, Sirchia SM, Simoni G, Miozzo M, Handyside A, Gabriel A, Thornhill AR, Clemente E, Reitter C, Affara N, Griffin DK, Macek M, Feldmar P, Kluckova H, Hrehorcak M, Diblik J, Paulasova P, Turnovec M, Vilimova S, Macek M, Fontes L, Haddad L, Borges E, Iaconelli A, Braga DPAF, Vianna-Morgante AM, Komsky A, Kasterstein E, Komarovsky D, Bern O, Maslansky B, Kaplan T, Raziel A, Friedler S, Gidoni Y, Ben-Ami I, Ron-El R, Strassburger D, Maggiulli R, Monahan D, Neri QV, Hu JCY, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD, Beyazyurek C, Ekmekci GC, Tac HA, Ajredin N, Verlinsky O, Fiorentino F, Kahraman S, Camp M, Hesters L, Le Lorc'h M, Frydman R, Romana S, Frydman N, Perez Sanz J, Matorras R, Arluzea J, Romin Y, Bilbao J, Gonzalez-Santiago N, Manova-Todorova K, Koff A, Rivera-Pomar JM, de la Hoz-Torres C, Xanthopoulou L, Ghevaria H, Mantzouratou A, Serhal P, Doshi A, Delhanty JD, Ye Y, Qian Y, Jin F, Munne S, Gutierrez C, Wagner C, Hill D, Wiemer K, Fischer J, Kaplan B, Danzer H, Surrey M, Opsahl M, Hladikova B, Sobek A, Tkadlec E, Kyselova K, Sobek A, Nichi M, Figueira RCS, Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Colturato SS, Setti AS, Figueira RCS, Braga DPAF, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Rubio C, Domingo J, Rodrigo L, Mercader A, De los Santos MJ, Pehlivan T, Bosch E, Fernandez M, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Perez-Nevot B, Lendinez AM, Palomares AR, Polo M, Rodriguez A, Reche A, Ruiz-Galdon M, Reyes-Engel A, Knauff EAH, Blauw HM, Kok K, Wijmenga C, Fauser BCJM, Franke L, Paffoni A, Paracchini V, Ferrari S, Restelli L, Coviello DA, Scarduelli C, Seia M, Ragni G, Aoyama N, Takehara Y, Kawachiya S, Kuroda T, Kawasaki N, Yamadera R, Suzuki T, Kato K, Kato O, Xu QH, Zhang ZG, Zhou P, Wei ZL, Huang DK, Xing Q, Cao YX, Fauque P, Ripoche MA, Tost J, Journot L, Jouannet P, Vaiman D, Dandolo L, Jammes H, Hellani A, Elsheikh A, Abuamero KK, Elakoum S, Palomares AR, Lendinez AM, Perez-Nevot B, Martinez F, Perez de la Blanca E, Ruiz-Galdon M, Reyes-Engel A, Sobek A, Hladikova B, Tkadlec E, Koutna O, Cepelak T, Kyselova K, Sobek AJR. Posters * Reproductive Genetics (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod 2010. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/de.25.s1.534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
47
|
Matsumoto Y, Goto S, Hashimoto H, Kokeguchi S, Shiotani M, Okada H, Cohen - Bacrie P, Hazout A, Belloc S, De Mouzon J, Menezo Y, Dumont M, Junca AM, Cohen-Bacrie M, Alvarez S, Olivennes F, Prisant N, Weltin M, Geissler W, Clussmann C, Strowitzki T, Eggert-Kruse W, Endou Y, Fjii Y, Motoyama H, Quintana FQ, Zaloa Larreategui ZL, Iratxe Penalba IP, Sara Ortega SO, Monica Martin MM, Guillermo Quea GQ, Jose Serna JS, Showell MG, Brown J, Yazdani A, Stankiewicz MT, Hart RJ, Zumoffen C, Munuce MJ, Caille A, Ghersevich S, Lendinez AM, Perez-Nevot B, Palomares AR, Serrano Garballo A, Rodriguez A, Reche A, Mayor-Olea A, Ruiz-Galdon M, Reyes-Engel A, Mendiola J, Jorgensen N, Andersson AM, Calafat AM, Redmon JB, Drobnis EZ, Wang C, Sparks A, Thurston SW, Liu F, Swan SH, Tarasconi AC, Tarasconi BV, Tarasconi DV, Silva EMV, Fujii Y, Endou Y, Motoyama H, Crha I, Pribyl J, Skladal P, Zakova J, Ventruba P, Pohanka M, De La Fuente G, Pacheco A, Velasco JAG, Requena A, Pacheco Castro A, San Celestino Carchenilla M, Salvanes R, Arnanz A, Balmori C, Pellicer A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Hashimoto H, Ishikawa T, Goto S, Kokeguchi S, Fujisawa M, Shiotani M, Kranz S, Hersemeyer K, Hentrich A, Tinneberg HR, Konrad L, Simon L, Lutton D, McManus J, Lewis SEM, San Celestino Carchenilla M, Pacheco Castro A, Rubio S, Simon Sanjurjo P, Pellicer A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Lewis S, Lutton D, McManus J, Simon L, Buzzi J, Valcarcel A, Lombardi E, Oses R, Rawe V, Young E, Magendzo A, Lizama S, Duque G, Mackenna A, Lutton D, Simon L, McManus J, Lewis SEM, Monqaut A, Zavaleta C, Lopez G, Lafuente R, Brassesco M, Condorelli R, La Vignera S, La Rosa S, Barone N, Vicari E, Bellanca S, D'Agata R, Calogero AE, Enciso M, Iglesias M, Galan I, Gosalvez A, Gosalvez J, Curaba M, Poels J, Van Langendonckt A, Donnez J, Wyns C, Garcez M, Salvador M, Pasqualotto EB, Braga DPAF, Borges E, Pasqualotto FF, Aoki T, Figueira RCS, Maldonado LGL, Pasqualotto FF, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Frassini R, Mandelli J, Pasqualotto EB, Borges E, Figueira RCS, Braga DPAF, Pasqualotto FF, Borges E, Pasqualotto FF, Figueira RCS, Setti AS, Braga DPAF, Cortezzi SS, Iaconelli A, La Vignera S, Vicari E, Di Mauro M, Burrello N, Condorelli R, D'Agata R, Calogero AE, Kashir J, Jones C, Young C, Ruas M, Grasa P, Rietdorf K, Heytens E, Heindryckx B, Yoon SY, Fissore RA, Deane CM, Nikiforaki D, Tee ST, de Sutter P, Parrington J, Coward K, Visser L, Westerveld GH, van Daalen SKM, van der Veen F, Lombardi MP, Repping S, Cubillos S, Sanchez S, Pedraza J, Charria G, Aparicio H, Gongora A, Caldino F, Cuneo S, Ou JP, Zhao WE, Liu YF, Xu YW, Zhou CQ, Al-Asmar Pinar N, Peinado V, Gruhn J, Susiarjo M, Gil-Salom M, Martinez-Jabaloyas JM, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Rubio C, Hassold T, Peinado V, Al-Asmar N, Gruhn J, Rodrigo L, Gil-Salom M, Martinez-Jabaloyas JM, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Hassold TJ, Rubio C, Bungum M, Forsell N, Giwercman A, Amiri I, Sheikh N, Najafi R, Godarzi M, Farimani M, Makukh H, Tyrkus M, Zastavna D, Nakonechnuy A, Khayat SS, Schileiko LV, Kurilo LF, Garcia-Herrero S, Garrido N, Martinez-Conejero JA, Romany L, Pellicer A, Meseguer M, Dorphin B, Lefevre M, Gout C, Oger P, Yazbeck C, Rougier N, De Stefani S, Scala V, Benedetti S, Tagliamonte MC, Zavagnini E, Palini S, Bulletti C, Canestrari F, Subiran N, Pinto FM, Candenas ML, Agirregoitia E, Irazusta J, Cha EM, Lee JH, Park IH, Lee KH, Kim MH, Jensen MS, Rebordosa C, Thulstrup AM, Toft G, Sorensen HT, Bonde JP, Henriksen TB, Olsen J, Bosco L, Speciale M, Manno M, Amireh N, Roccheri MC, Cittadini E, Wu P, Lee YM, Chen HW, Tzeng CR, Llacer J, Ten J, Lledo B, Rodriguez-Arnedo A, Morales R, Bernabeu R, Garcia-Peiro A, Martinez-Heredia J, Oliver-Bonet M, Ribas J, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Gosalvez J, Navarro J, Benet J, Moutou C, Gardes N, Nicod JC, Becker N, Bailly MP, Galland I, Pirello O, Rongieres C, Wittemer C, Viville S, Elmahaishi W, Smith B, Doshi A, Serhal P, Harper JC, Rennemeier C, Kammerer U, Dietl J, Staib P, Elgmati K, Nomikos M, Theodoridou M, Calver B, Swann K, Lai FA, Georgiou I, Lazaros L, Xita N, Kaponis A, Plachouras N, Hatzi E, Zikopoulos K, Ferfouri F, Clement P, Molina Gomes D, Albert M, Bailly M, Wainer R, Selva J, Vialard F, Takisawa T, Usui K, Kyoya T, Shibuya Y, Hattori H, Sato Y, Ota M, Kyono K, Chiu PC, Lam KK, Lee CL, Chung MK, Huang VW, O WS, Tang F, Ho PC, Yeung WS, Kim CH, Lee JY, Kim SH, Suh CS, Shin YK, Kang YJ, Jung JH, Cha CY, Hwang ES, Mukaida T, Nagaba M, Takahashi K, Elkaffash D, Sedrak M, Huhtaniemi I, Abdel-Al T, Younan D, Cassuto NG, Bouret D, Hammoud I, Yazbeck C, Barak Y, Seshadri S, Bates M, Vince G, Jones DI, Ben Khalifa M, Montjean D, Menezo Y, Cohen-Bacrie P, Belloc S, De Mouzon J, Alvarez S, Aubriot FX, Olivennes F, Cohen M, Prisant N, Boudjema E, Magli MC, Crippa A, Baccetti B, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Singer T, Neri QV, Hu JC, Maggiulli R, Kollman Z, Rauch E, Schlegel PN, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD, Zorn B, Skrbinc B, Matos E, Golob B, Pfeifer M, Osredkar J, Sabanegh E, Sharma RK, Thiyagarajan A, Agarwal A, Robin G, Boitrelle F, Marcelli F, Marchetti C, Mitchell V, Dewailly D, Rigot JM, Rives N, Perdrix A, Travers A, Milazzo JP, Mousset-Simeon N, Mace B, Jakab A, Molnar Z, Benyo M, Levai I, Kassai Z, Golob B, Zorn B, Ihan A, Kopitar A, Kolbezen M, Vaamonde D, Da Silva-Grigoletto ME, Garcia-Manso JM, Vaamonde-Lemos R, Oehninger SC, Walis G, Monahan D, Neri QV, Ermolovich E, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD, Fadlon E, Abu Elhija A, Abu Elhija M, Lunenfeld E, Huleihel M, Costantini-Ferrando M, Maggiulli R, Neri QV, Hu JCY, Monahan D, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD, Alvarez JG, Gosalvez A, Velilla E, Lopez-Teijon M, Lopez-Fernandez C, Gosalvez J, Tempest HG, Sun F, Oliver-Bonet M, Ko E, Turek P, Martin RH, Zomeno-Abellan MT, Ramirez A, Gutierrez-Adan A, Martinez JC, Landeras J, Ballesta J, Aviles M, Lafuente R, Lopez G, Monqaut A, Brassesco M, Ganaiem M, Binder S, Abu Elhija M, Lunenfeld E, Meinhardt A, Huleihel M, Sousa L, Grangeia A, Carvalho F, Sousa M, Barros A, Sifer C, Sermondade N, Hafhouf E, Poncelet C, Benzacken B, Levy R, Wolf JP, Crisol L, Aspichueta F, Hernandez ML, Exposito A, Matorras R, Ruiz-Larrea MB, Ruiz-Sanz JI, Jallad S, Atig F, Ben Amor H, Saad ALI, Kerkeni A, Ajina M, Othmane ALI, Koscinski I, Ladureau L, Wittemer C, Viville S, Scarselli F, Casciani V, Lobascio M, Minasi MG, Rubino P, Colasante A, Arizzi L, Litwicka K, Iammarrone E, Ferrero S, Mencacci C, Franco G, Zavaglia D, Nagy ZP, Greco E, Ohgi S, Takahashi M, Kishi C, Suga K, Yanaihara A, Chamley LW, Wagner A, Shelling AN. Andrology (Male Fertility, Spermatogenesis). Hum Reprod 2010. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/de.25.s1.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
48
|
Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, Colamaria S, Sapienza F, Ubaldi F. Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod 2009; 25:66-73. [PMID: 19861328 PMCID: PMC2794665 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 326] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A successful oocyte cryopreservation programme is of utmost importance where a limited number of oocytes can be inseminated per cycle, to overcome legal and ethical issues related to embryo storage, for oocyte donation programmes and for fertility preservation (especially for cancer patients). Vitrification has been recently proposed as an effective procedure for this purpose. METHODS In order to validate the effectiveness of oocyte vitrification a non-inferiority trial was started on sibling metaphase II (MII) oocytes. To demonstrate the non-inferiority based on an absolute difference of 17% in the fertilization rate per sibling oocyte, a minimum of 222 oocytes were required. After oocyte denudation, MII oocytes with normal morphology were randomly allocated to fresh ICSI insemination or to vitrification procedure. If pregnancy was not obtained a subsequent ICSI cycle was performed with warmed oocytes of the same cohort. In both groups, three oocytes were inseminated per cycle by ICSI procedure. Primary end-points were fertilization rates calculated per warmed and per injected oocytes. Secondary end-points were zygote and embryo morphology. RESULTS A total of 244 oocytes were involved in this study. Of the 120 fresh sibling oocytes inseminated, 100 were fertilized (83.3%). Survival rate of sibling vitrified oocytes was 96.8% (120/124 oocytes). Fertilization rate after ICSI was 76.6% (95/124) per warmed oocyte and 79.2% (95/120) per survived/inseminated oocyte. No statistical difference in fertilization rates was observed between the two groups when calculated per sibling oocytes (absolute difference -6.73%; OR: 0.65; 95% CI = 0.33-1.29; P = 0.20) and per inseminated oocyte (absolute difference -4.17%; OR: 0.76; 95% CI = 0.37-1.53; P = 0.50). Embryo development was also similar in both treatment groups up till Day 2. The percentage of excellent quality embryos was 52.0% (52/100) in the fresh group and 51.6% (49/95) in the vitrification group (absolute difference -0.43%; OR: 0.98; 95% CI = 0.53-1.79; P = 0.9). The mean age of the 40 patients included in this study was 35.5 +/- 4.8 years (range 26-42). Fifteen clinical pregnancies were obtained in the vitrification cycles of 39 embryo transfers performed (37.5% per cycle, 38.5% per embryo transfer), with an implantation rate of 20.2% (19/94). Three spontaneous miscarriages occurred (20%). Twelve pregnancies are ongoing (30.0% per cycle, 30.8% per embryo transfer) beyond 12 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that oocyte vitrification procedure followed by ICSI is not inferior to fresh insemination procedure, with regard to fertilization and embryo developmental rates. Moreover, ongoing clinical pregnancy is compatible with this procedure, even with a restricted number of oocytes available for insemination. The promising clinical results obtained, in a population of infertile patients, need to be confirmed on a larger scale. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER iSRCTN60158641.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rienzi
- G.E.N.E.R.A. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, via de Notaris 2B, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Maggiulli R, Lork E, Behrens U, Burger K, Mews R. Cycloaddition reactions with thiazyl derivatives RSN (RF, on(CF3)2): formation of 2,5-dihydro-1λ4,2,4,6-thiatriazines. J Fluor Chem 2000. [DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1139(99)00299-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
50
|
Maggiulli R, Mews R. 5-Trifluoromethyl-1,3-dithia-2,4,6-triazines. J Fluor Chem 1987. [DOI: 10.1016/0022-1139(87)95116-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|