1
|
Broderick RC, Spurzem GJ, Huang EY, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Weisman RA, Onaitis MW, Weissbrod PA, Horgan S. A Multidisciplinary Minimally Invasive Approach Is Necessary for the Contemporary Management of Esophageal Diverticula. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:291-298. [PMID: 38407920 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Esophageal diverticula were traditionally treated with open surgery, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Management has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with several advantages. We examine outcomes in patients with esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive techniques by a multidisciplinary surgical team at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula at our institution from June 2010 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for reintervention. Results: A total of 28 patients were identified. Twelve patients had pharyngeal diverticula, 7 patients had midesophageal diverticula, and 9 patients had epiphrenic diverticula. Thirty-day morbidity and readmission rates were 10.7% (3 patients), 1 pharyngeal (sepsis), 1 midesophageal (refractory nausea), and 1 epiphrenic (poor oral intake). There were no esophageal leaks. Average LOS was 2.3 days, with the pharyngeal group experiencing a significantly shorter LOS (1.3 days versus 3.4 days for midesophageal, P < .01 versus 2.8 days for epiphrenic, P < .05). Symptom resolution after initial operation was 78.6%. Reintervention rate was 17.9%, and symptom resolution after reintervention was 100%. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophageal diverticula can be repaired safely and efficiently when performed by a multidisciplinary team utilizing advanced minimally invasive endoscopic and robotic surgical techniques. We advocate for the management of this rare condition at a high-volume center with extensive experience in foregut surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Broderick
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Graham J Spurzem
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Estella Y Huang
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Robert A Weisman
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Mark W Onaitis
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Philip A Weissbrod
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang EY, Broderick RC, Spurzem GJ, Li JZ, Blitzer RR, Cheverie JN, Sandler BJ, Horgan S, Jacobsen GR. Long-term outcomes of PGA-TMC absorbable synthetic scaffold in both clean and contaminated ventral hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2231-2239. [PMID: 38498213 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10777-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biosynthetic meshes afford the cost advantages of being made from fully synthetic material, but are also biodegradable, making them a versatile option that can be used in both clean and contaminated cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and long-term outcomes of using GORE BIO-A (BIO-A) as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction in all wound classes. METHODS A retrospective review identified patients undergoing abdominal hernia repair using BIO-A from October 2008 to June 2018. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence rate. Only patients with at least 6-month follow-up were included when looking at recurrence rates. Secondary outcomes included 30-day morbidity categorized according to CDC Surgical Site Infection Criteria, return to operating/procedure room (RTOR), 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. RESULTS A total of 207 patients were identified, CDC Wound Classification breakdown was 127 (61.4%), 41 (19.8%), 14 (6.8%), and 25 (12.1%) for wound classes I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Median follow-up was 55.4 months (range 0.2-162.4). Overall recurrence rate was 17.4%. Contaminated cases experienced higher recurrence rates (28.8% versus 10.4%, p = 0.002) at a mean follow up of 46.9 and 60.8 months for contaminated and clean patients, respectively. Recurrent patients had higher BMI (32.4 versus 28.4 kg/m2, p = 0.0011), larger hernias (162.2 versus 106.7 cm2, p = 0.10), higher LOS (11.1 versus 5.6 days, p = 0.0051), and higher RTOR rates (16.7% versus 5.6%, p = 0.053). 51 (24.5%) patients experienced some morbidity, including 19 (9.2%) surgical site occurences, 7 (3.4%) superficial surgical site infections, 16 (7.7%) deep surgical site infections, and 1 (0.5%) organ space infection. CONCLUSION This study affirms the use of biosynthetic mesh as a cost-effective alternative in all wound classifications, yielding good outcomes, limited long-term complications, and low recurrence. rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estella Y Huang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Graham J Spurzem
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA.
| | - Jonathan Z Li
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Rachel R Blitzer
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Joslin N Cheverie
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spurzem GJ, Broderick RC, Li JZ, Sandler BJ, Horgan S, Jacobsen GR. Maximizing mesh mileage: evaluating the long-term performance of a novel hybrid mesh for ventral hernia repair. Hernia 2024:10.1007/s10029-024-02995-0. [PMID: 38429399 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02995-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and long-term outcomes of GORE Synecor™ in ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS This retrospective, single-center case review analyzed outcomes in patients who underwent VHR with Synecor from May 2016 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were hernia recurrence and mesh infection rates. Secondary outcomes were 30-day morbidity, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, re-operation, surgical-site infection (SSI) and occurrence (SSO) rates, and occurrences requiring intervention (SSOI). RESULTS 278 patients were identified. Mean follow-up was 24.1 (0.2-87.1) months. Mean hernia defect size was 63.4 (± 77.2) cm2. Overall hernia recurrence and mesh infection rates were 5.0% and 1.4% respectively. No mesh infections required full explantation. We report the following overall rates: 13.3% 30-day morbidity, 4.7% 30-day readmission, 2.9% re-operation, 7.2% SSI, 6.1% SSO, and 2.9% SSOI. 30-day morbidity was significantly higher in non-clean (42.1% vs 11.2%, p < 0.01), onlay (OL) mesh (37.0% vs preperitoneal (PP) 16.4%, p = 0.05 vs retrorectus (RR) 15.0%, p < 0.05 vs intraperitoneal (IP) 5.2%, p < 0.001), and open cases (23.5% vs 3.1% laparoscopic vs 4.4% robotic, p < 0.01). SSI rates were significantly higher in non-clean (31.6% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001), OL mesh (29.6% vs RR 11.3%, p < 0.05 vs PP 5.5%, p < 0.01 vs IP 0.0%, p < 0.001), and open cases (15.2% vs 0% laparoscopic vs 0% robotic, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Long-term performance of a novel hybrid mesh in VHR demonstrates a low recurrence rate and favorable safety profile in various defect sizes and mesh placement locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G J Spurzem
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
| | - R C Broderick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - J Z Li
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - B J Sandler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - S Horgan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - G R Jacobsen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ilfeld BM, Abramson WB, Alexander B, Sztain JF, Said ET, Broderick RC, Sandler BJ, Doucet JJ, Adams LM, Abdullah B, Cha BJ, Finneran JJ. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following cholecystectomy and hernia repair: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024:rapm-2024-105283. [PMID: 38388014 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous auricular nerve stimulation (neuromodulation) involves implanting electrodes around the ear and administering an electric current. A device is currently available within the USA cleared to treat symptoms from opioid withdrawal, and multiple reports suggest a possible postoperative analgesic effect. The current randomized controlled pilot study was undertaken to (1) determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent definitive clinical trial; and (2) estimate the treatment effect of auricular neuromodulation on postoperative pain and opioid consumption following two ambulatory surgical procedures. METHODS Within the recovery room following cholecystectomy or hernia repair, an auricular neuromodulation device (NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo, Irvine, California, USA) was applied. Participants were randomized to 5 days of either electrical stimulation or sham in a double-blinded fashion. RESULTS In the first 5 days, the median (IQR) pain level for active stimulation (n=15) was 0.6 (0.3-2.4) vs 2.6 (1.1-3.7) for the sham group (n=15) (p=0.041). Concurrently, the median oxycodone use for the active stimulation group was 0 mg (0-1), compared with 0 mg (0-3) for the sham group (p=0.524). Regarding the highest pain level experienced over the entire 8-day study period, only one participant (7%) who received active stimulation experienced severe pain, versus seven (47%) in those given sham (p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation reduced pain scores but not opioid requirements during the initial week after cholecystectomy and hernia repair. Given the ease of application as well as a lack of systemic side effects and reported complications, a definitive clinical trial appears warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05521516.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Ilfeld
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Wendy B Abramson
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Brenton Alexander
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jacklynn F Sztain
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Engy T Said
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jay J Doucet
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Laura M Adams
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Baharin Abdullah
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Brannon J Cha
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - John J Finneran
- Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spurzem GJ, Broderick RC, Horgan S. Demonstrating the utility of fluorescence cholangiography with indocyanine green during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00157-4. [PMID: 38458910 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Graham J Spurzem
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang EY, Reeves JJ, Broderick RC, Serra JL, Goldhaber NH, An JY, Fowler KJ, Hosseini M, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Horgan S, Clary BM. Distinguishing characteristics of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and gallbladder adenocarcinoma: a persistent diagnostic dilemma. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:348-355. [PMID: 37783778 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10461-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) is an uncommon variant of chronic cholecystitis which can resemble gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GAC) on preoperative imaging and present technical challenges in the performance of cholecystectomy. We examined our experience with each pathology to identify distinguishing characteristics that may guide patient counseling and surgical management. METHODS A retrospective review of all pathologically confirmed cases of XGC and GAC following cholecystectomy between 2015 and 2021 at a single institution was performed. Clinical, biochemical, radiographic, and intraoperative features were compared. RESULTS There were 37 cases of XGC and 20 cases of GAC. Patients with GAC were older (mean 70.3 years vs 58.0, p = 0.01) and exclusively female (100% vs 45.9%, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in accompanying symptoms between groups (nausea/vomiting, fevers, or jaundice). The mean maximum white blood cell count was elevated for XGC compared to GAC (16.4 vs 8.6 respectively, p = 0.044); however, there were no differences in the remainder of the biochemical profile, including bilirubin, liver transaminases, CEA, and CA 19-9. The presence of an intraluminal mass (61.1% vs 9.1%, p = 0.0001) and lymphadenopathy (18.8%. vs 0.0%, p = 0.045) were associated with malignancy, whereas gallbladder wall thickening as reported on imaging (87.9% vs 38.9%, p = 0.0008) and gallstones (76.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.053) were more often present with XGC. Cases of XGC more often had significant adhesions/inflammation (83.8% vs 55.0%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Clinical features that may favor benign chronic cholecystitis over gallbladder adenocarcinoma include younger age, male gender, current or prior leukocytosis, and the absence of an intraluminal mass or lymphadenopathy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe surgical option for equivocal presentations. Intraoperative frozen section or intentional staging of more extensive procedures based upon final histopathology are valuable surgical strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estella Y Huang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA.
| | - James J Reeves
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Joaquin L Serra
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Nicole H Goldhaber
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Julie Y An
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mojgan Hosseini
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Bryan M Clary
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang EY, Chung D, Hollandsworth HM, Goldhaber NH, Robles L, Horgan M, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Broderick RC, Grunvald E, Horgan S. Bite by byte: can fitness wearables help bariatric patients lose more weight after surgery? Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10157-z. [PMID: 37286749 PMCID: PMC10338384 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10157-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary approaches to weight loss have been shown to improve outcomes in bariatric patients. Few studies have been performed assessing the utility and compliance of fitness tracking devices after bariatric surgery. We aim to determine whether use of an activity tracking device assists bariatric patients in improving postoperative weight loss behaviors. METHODS A fitness wearable was offered to patients undergoing bariatric surgery from 2019 to 2022. A telephone survey was conducted to elucidate the impact of the device on the patient's postoperative weight loss efforts 6 to 12 months after surgery. Weight loss outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients receiving the fitness wearable (FW) were compared to those of a group of SG patients who did not receive one (non-FW). RESULTS Thirty-seven patients were given a fitness wearable, 20 of whom responded to our telephone survey. Five patients reported not using the device and were excluded. 88.2% reported that using the device had a positive impact on their overall lifestyle. Patients felt that using the fitness wearable to keeping track of their progress helped them both to achieve short-term fitness goals and sustain them in the long run. From the patients that utilized the device, 44.4% of those that discontinued felt like it helped them build a routine that they maintained even after they were no longer using it. Demographic data between FW and non-FW groups (age, sex, CCI, initial BMI, and surgery BMI) did not differ significantly. The FW group trended towards greater %EWL at 1 year post-operation (65.2% versus 52.4%, p = 0.066) and had significantly greater %TWL at 1 year post-operation (30.3% versus 22.3%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The use of an activity tracking device enhances a patient's post-bariatric surgery experience, serving to keep patients informed and motivated, and leading to improved activity that may translate to better weight loss outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estella Y Huang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA.
| | - Daniel Chung
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Hannah M Hollandsworth
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Nicole H Goldhaber
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Lorijane Robles
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Maria Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Eduardo Grunvald
- Division of General Internal Medicine, UCSD Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang EY, Li JZ, Chung D, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Wadhwa A, Said E, Robbins K, Horgan S, Broderick RC. Carbohydrate Loading and Aspiration Risk in Bariatric Patients: Safety in Preoperative Enhanced Recovery Protocols. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:1200-1206. [PMID: 36804320 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery protocols have been developed to improve perioperative outcomes; however, there is ongoing concern for aspiration with recent oral intake in patients with obesity, who may be predisposed to impaired gastrointestinal motility and greater gastric volumes. We aim to study the safety of a 300-mL preoperative carbohydrate-loading drink preceding bariatric surgery. STUDY DESIGN Data were collected prospectively from patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery. All bariatric patients at our institution are prescribed a proton pump inhibitor for 4 weeks before surgery and undergo a screening preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) before surgery with a traditional 8-hour fast (NOCARB), followed by an intraoperative day-of-operation EGD with carbohydrate loading (CARB) 2 to 4 hours before incision. Gastric volumes and pH are measured after being endoscopically suctioned via direct visualization during both settings. RESULTS We identified 203 patients: 94 patients (46.3%) in the CARB group and 109 patients (53.7%) in the NOCARB group. The patients were 82.3% female with a mean age of 42.8 years and average BMI of 41.7 kg/m 2 . There was no difference in gastric volume between NOCARB and CARB (17.0 vs 16.1 mL, p = 0.59). The NOCARB group had lower pH values than the CARB group (2.8 vs 3.8, p = 0.001). Subset analysis of 23 patients who had measurements on both screening and intraoperative EGD revealed lower gastric volumes in CARB patients (13.3 vs 18.3, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS When included in an enhanced recovery protocol, proton pump inhibitor use and preoperative carbohydrate loading 2 to 4 hours before bariatric surgery does not increase aspiration risk based on gastric volumes and pH and should be strongly considered in all eligible bariatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estella Y Huang
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery (Huang, Li, Chung, Jacobsen, Sandler, Horgan, Broderick), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Jonathan Z Li
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery (Huang, Li, Chung, Jacobsen, Sandler, Horgan, Broderick), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Daniel Chung
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery (Huang, Li, Chung, Jacobsen, Sandler, Horgan, Broderick), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery (Huang, Li, Chung, Jacobsen, Sandler, Horgan, Broderick), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery (Huang, Li, Chung, Jacobsen, Sandler, Horgan, Broderick), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Anupama Wadhwa
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX (Wadhwa)
| | - Engy Said
- Department of Anesthesiology (Said, Robbins), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Kimberly Robbins
- Department of Anesthesiology (Said, Robbins), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery (Huang, Li, Chung, Jacobsen, Sandler, Horgan, Broderick), University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery (Huang, Li, Chung, Jacobsen, Sandler, Horgan, Broderick), University of California, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang EY, Broderick RC, Li JZ, Serra JL, Ahuja P, Wu S, Genz M, Grunvald E, Kunkel DC, Sandler BJ, Horgan S, Jacobsen GR. Weight loss outcomes are not compromised in bariatric patients using cannabis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:2194-2201. [PMID: 35861881 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09453-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The legalization of cannabis in several states has led to increased documented use in the population. Bariatric surgery patients are no exception with estimates of anywhere from 6 to 8%. Cannabis is known to be associated with increased appetite, mood disorders, hyperphagia, and rarely, hyperemesis, which can potentially affect post-surgical weight loss. We aim to study the differences in bariatric surgery outcomes between cannabis users and non-users. METHODS A retrospective review identified patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, cannabis users (CU) and non-cannabis users (non-CU). Cannabis users (defined as using at least once weekly) and a group of non-users were called to obtain additional information. Primary outcome was weight loss. Secondary outcomes included incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for additional intervention. RESULTS A cohort of 364 sleeve gastrectomy patients met inclusion criteria, 31 (8.5%) CU and 333 (91.5%) non-CU. There was no difference in EWL between CU and non-CU at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years. However, the CU group trended towards greater EWL at 3 years (52.9% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.094) and at 5 years (49.8% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.068). There were no significant differences between CU and non-CU with respect to either incidence or severity of PONV at one year after surgery or longer follow-up. CONCLUSION Cannabis users did not experience inferior weight loss after bariatric surgery despite common assumptions that appetite stimulation can lead to suboptimal weight loss outcomes. Our findings add to other work challenging this dogma. Larger, long-term, multicenter studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estella Y Huang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA.
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Jonathan Z Li
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Joaquin L Serra
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Pranav Ahuja
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Samantha Wu
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Michael Genz
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Eduardo Grunvald
- Division of General Internal Medicine, UCSD Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - David C Kunkel
- Division of Gastroenterology, GI Motility & Physiology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MET Building 845, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
D'Ambrosia C, Aronoff-Spencer E, Huang EY, Goldhaber NH, Christensen HI, Broderick RC, Appelbaum LG. The neurophysiology of intraoperative error: An EEG study of trainee surgeons during robotic-assisted surgery simulations. Front Neurogenom 2023; 3:1052411. [PMID: 38235463 PMCID: PMC10790934 DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.1052411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Surgeons operate in mentally and physically demanding workspaces where the impact of error is highly consequential. Accurately characterizing the neurophysiology of surgeons during intraoperative error will help guide more accurate performance assessment and precision training for surgeons and other teleoperators. To better understand the neurophysiology of intraoperative error, we build and deploy a system for intraoperative error detection and electroencephalography (EEG) signal synchronization during robot-assisted surgery (RAS). We then examine the association between EEG data and detected errors. Our results suggest that there are significant EEG changes during intraoperative error that are detectable irrespective of surgical experience level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D'Ambrosia
- College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Cognitive Robotics Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Contextual Robotics Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Eliah Aronoff-Spencer
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Estella Y. Huang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Nicole H. Goldhaber
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Henrik I. Christensen
- Cognitive Robotics Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Contextual Robotics Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Ryan C. Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Lawrence G. Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Broderick RC, Li JZ, Blitzer RR, Ahuja P, Race A, Yang G, Sandler BJ, Horgan S, Jacobsen GR. A steady stream of knowledge: decreased urinary retention after implementation of ERAS protocols in ambulatory minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6742-6750. [PMID: 34982228 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08950-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Potential complications after inguinal hernia repair include uncontrolled post-operative pain and post-operative urinary retention (POUR). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to mitigate post-operative morbidity. We study the impact of ERAS measures alongside discharge without a narcotic prescription on post-operative pain and POUR after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients that underwent minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair at a single institution. Intra-operative data included operative time, narcotic usage, non-narcotic adjunct medication, and fluid administration. Primary outcomes included rates of POUR and uncontrolled post-operative pain. Operations performed after 2018 were included in the ERAS cohort. Uncontrolled post-operative pain was defined as needing additional narcotic prescriptions, admission, or ER visits for post-operative pain. POUR was defined as requiring an indwelling urethral catheter at discharge, admission for retention, or returning to the ER for urinary retention. RESULTS Between January 2008 and March 2021, 1097 patients who underwent minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair were identified. 91.3% of these procedures were laparoscopic and 8.7% were robotic. Average patient age was 57.4 years, 93% were male. Patients receiving care after initiation of the ERAS protocol were significantly less likely to experience POUR when compared to their prior counterparts (1.4% vs. 4.2% p = 0.01); there was no difference in post-operative pain complications (1.4% vs. 2.9% p = 0.15). Patients who were discharged without a narcotic prescription had 0% incidence of POUR. Significant differences were found between the ERAS and non-ERAS cohort regarding narcotic usage and fluid administration. Age, higher fluid volume, and higher narcotic usage were found to be risk factors for POUR while ERAS, sugammadex, and dexamethasone were found to be protective. CONCLUSION Implementation of an ambulatory ERAS protocol can significantly decrease urinary retention and narcotic usage rates after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Z Li
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
- Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA.
| | - Rachel R Blitzer
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Pranav Ahuja
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Alice Race
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Gene Yang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li JZ, Broderick RC, Huang EY, Serra J, Wu S, Genz M, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Horgan S. Post Sleeve Reflux: indicators and impact on outcomes. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:3145-3153. [PMID: 35948805 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09454-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a significant morbidity following sleeve gastrectomy (SG). We aim to evaluate the incidence and impact within a single center experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed identifying laparoscopic or robotic SG patients. Primary outcomes included weight loss, rates of post-operative GERD (de-novo or aggravated), and re-intervention. Subgroup analysis was performed between patients with (Group 1) and without (Group 2) post-operative GERD. De-novo GERD and aggravated was defined as persistent GERD complaints or new/increased PPI usage in GERD naive or prior GERD patients, respectively. RESULTS 392 patients were identified between 2014 and 2019. Average demographics: age 42.3 (18-84) years, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 1.12 (0-10), and body mass index (BMI) 47.7 (28-100). 98% were performed laparoscopically. Average excess weight loss (EWL) was 51.0% and 46.4% at 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Average follow up was 516 (6-2694) days. 69 (17%) patients developed post operative de-novo or aggravated GERD. Group 1 had significantly higher EWL at 9 months (57% vs 47%, p 0.003). 13 (3%) patients required operative re-intervention for GERD and other morbidities: 4 RYGB conversions, 4 diagnostic laparoscopies, 3 HHR, 1 MSA placement. Group 1 had higher rates of post-operative intervention (14% vs 1%, p 0.0001). Subanalysis demonstrated that Group 1 had elevated preoperative DeMeester scores on pH testing (34.8 vs 18.9, p 0.03). De-novo GERD had an elevated post-operative total acid exposure when compared to aggravated GERD (12.7% vs 7.0% p 0.03). No significant differences were found between preoperative endoscopy findings, pre and postoperative total acid exposure, post-operative DeMeester scores, and high-resolution manometry values regarding de-novo/aggravated GERD development. CONCLUSION Preoperative DeMeester scores may serve as risk indicators regarding post-operative GERD. Outcomes such as reintervention remain elevated in post-operative GERD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Z Li
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA.
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Estella Y Huang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Joaquin Serra
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Samantha Wu
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Michael Genz
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Broderick RC, Li JZ, Huang EY, Blitzer RR, Lee AM, Serra JL, Bouvet M, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Horgan S. Lighting the Way with Fluorescent Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Reviewing 7 Years of Experience. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:713-723. [PMID: 36102574 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with fluorescent cholangiography using indocyanine green dye (FC) identifies extrahepatic biliary structures, potentially augmenting the critical view of safety. We aim to describe trends for the largest single-center cohort of patients undergoing FC in LC. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients undergoing LC with FC at a single academic institution. Patient factors included age, sex, BMI, and ASA score. Outcomes included operative time, conversion to open procedure, biliary injury, length of stay (LOS), and complications. RESULTS 828 patients underwent FC. 74.3% were female; mean age 50.4 years and average BMI 28.8 kg/m2. Mean OR time was 68.6 minutes. There were no mortalities nor common bile duct injuries. Morbidities included 4 bile leaks and 1 retained stone. 6 patients required conversion to an open approach. Operative time, length of stay, and open conversion significantly decreased post a standard ICG protocol (p <0.05). Compared to white light, FC demonstrated lower operative times (99 vs 68 minutes), LOS (1.4 vs 0.4 days), open conversions (8% vs 0.7%), ED visits (13% vs 8%) and drain placements (12% vs 3%) (all p <0.05). Patients with BMI >30 saw elevated operative times and LOS. CONCLUSION In conclusion, this paper demonstrates improved operative outcomes with the utilization of FC through the consistent ability to delineate biliary anatomy, even in the setting of complex anatomy. No common bile duct injuries have occurred in our 7-year experience with FC. We recommend FC as the standard of care when performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Broderick
- From the Department of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reeves JJ, Broderick RC, Lee AM, Blitzer RR, Waterman RS, Cheverie JN, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Bouvet M, Doucet J, Murphy JD, Horgan S. The price is right: Routine fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 2021; 171:1168-1176. [PMID: 34952715 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early experience with indocyanine green-based fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggests the potential to improve outcomes. However, the cost-effectiveness of routine use has not been studied. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fluorescent cholangiography versus standard bright light laparoscopic cholecystectomy for noncancerous gallbladder disease. METHODS A Markov model decision analysis was performed comparing fluorescent cholangiography versus standard bright light laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone. Probabilities of outcomes, survival, toxicities, quality-adjusted life-years, and associated costs were determined from literature review and pooled analysis of currently available studies on fluorescent cholangiography (n = 37). Uncertainty in the model parameters was evaluated with 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, varying parameters up to 40% of their means. Cost-effectiveness was measured with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the dollar amount per quality-adjusted life-year. RESULTS The model predicted that fluorescent cholangiography reduces lifetime costs by $1,235 per patient and improves effectiveness by 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years compared to standard bright light laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Reduced costs were due to a decreased operative duration (21.20 minutes, P < .0001) and rate of conversion to open (1.62% vs 6.70%, P < .0001) associated with fluorescent cholangiography. The model was not influenced by the rate of bile duct injury. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that fluorescent cholangiography was both more effective and less costly in 98.83% of model iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year. CONCLUSION The current evidence favors routine use of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a cost-effective surgical strategy. Our model predicts that fluorescent cholangiography reduces costs while improving health outcomes, suggesting fluorescence imaging may be considered standard surgical management for noncancerous gallbladder disease. Further study with prospective trials should be considered to verify findings of this predictive model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jeffery Reeves
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Arielle M Lee
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rachel R Blitzer
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ruth S Waterman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Joslin N Cheverie
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Michael Bouvet
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Jay Doucet
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fuchs KH, DeMeester TR, Otte F, Broderick RC, Breithaupt W, Varga G, Musial F. Severity of GERD and disease progression. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:6133416. [PMID: 33575739 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many factors may play a role in the severity and progression of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) since pathophysiology is multifactorial. Data regarding the progression of GERD are controversial: some reports of increased esophageal acid exposure (EAE) and mucosal damage were considered as evidence for a stable disease course, while others interprete these findings as disease progression. The aim of this study is to analyze a large patient-population with persisting symptoms indicative of GERD under protonpumpinhibitor-therapy and identify components characterizing disease severity and progression. METHODS Patients with symptoms indicative of GERD were included in the study in a tertiary referral center (Frankfurt, Germany). All selected patients were under long-term protonpumpinhibitor-therapy with persistant symptoms. All patients underwent investigations to collect data on their physical status, EAE, severity of esophagitis, anatomical changes, and esophageal functional defects as well as their relation to the duration of the disease. Incidence over time was plotted as survival curves and tested with Log-rank tests for the four main disease markers. Multivariate modeling with COX-regression model was used to estimate the general impact of the four main disease markers on the time course of the disease. In order to elucidate possible causal relationships over time, a path analysis (structural equation model) was calculated. RESULTS From the database with 1480 data sets, 972 patients were evaluated (542 males, 430 females). The mean age was 50.5 years (range18-89). The mean body mass index was 27.2(19-48). The mean time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnostic investigations was 8.2 years (1-50). A longer disease history for GERD was significantly associated with a higher risk for LES-incompetence. The mean duration from symptom onset to the time of clinical investigation was 9 years for patients with LES-incompetence (n = 563), compared to a mean of 6 years for those with mechanically intact LES (n = 95). A longer period from symptom onset to diagnostics was significantly associated with higher acid exposure. The pathway analysis was significant for the following model: 'history' (P < 0.001➔LES-incompetence & Hiatal Hernia➔(p < 0,001)➔pH-score (P < 0.001).Conclusion: LES-incompetence, the functional deterioration of the LES, and the anatomical alteration at the esophagogastric junction (Hiatal Hernia) as well as an increased EAE were associated with a long history of suffering from GERD. Path modeling suggests a causal sequence overtime of the main disease-parameters, tentatively allowing for a prediction of the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Fuchs
- University of California San Diego, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - T R DeMeester
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - F Otte
- University of Cologne, Department of General-, Visceral- and Cancer Surgery Cologne, Germany
| | - R C Broderick
- University of California San Diego, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - W Breithaupt
- St. Elisabethen Krankenhaus, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - G Varga
- AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - F Musial
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine NAFKAM, Department of Community Medicine, UiT, The Artic University of Noeway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cheverie JN, Neki K, Lee AM, Li JZ, Dominguez-Profeta R, Matsuzaki T, Broderick RC, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Horgan S. Minimally Invasive Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the Elderly: Is Age Really Just a Number? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:111-117. [PMID: 33709788 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Paraesophageal hernias readily affect the elderly with a median age of presentation between 65 and 75 years. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) is a technically challenging operation with potential for dire complications. Advanced age and medical comorbidities may heighten perioperative risk and limit surgical candidacy, potentially refusing patients an opportunity toward symptom resolution. Given the increased prevalence in the elderly and associated surgical risks, we aim to assess age as an independent risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality after PEHR. Methods: A retrospective analysis using a prospectively maintained database assessed patients undergoing PEHR from 2007 to 2018. Patients were stratified by age: Group A (age <65 years), Group B (65≤ age <80 years), and Group C (age ≥80 years). Patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, postoperative outcomes, and mortality rate were analyzed. Barium esophagram was performed on symptomatic postsurgical patients. Recurrence was confirmed radiologically. Results: In total, 143 patients underwent laparoscopic (94.4%) or robotic-assisted (5.6%) PEHR. Average age per group was Group A (n = 49) 55.4 years (standard deviation [SD] ±8.91), Group B (n = 76) 71.4 years (SD ±4.40), and Group C (n = 17) 84.1 (years) (SD ±3.37). Group C had significantly higher rates of nonelective surgery (P = .018), preoperative weight loss (P = .014), hypertension (P = .031), ischemic heart disease (P = .001), and cancer (P = .039); preoperative body mass index was significantly lower (P = .048). Charlson comorbidity index differences between groups were significant (2.00 versus 3.61 versus 5.28, P < .001). Median follow-up was 426 days (6-3199). Symptom improvement was seen in 78.3% of patients. Recurrence and reoperation rates were not significantly different between groups. No differences were seen in mortality, length of stay, or postoperative complications between groups. Conclusions: PEHR in elderly patients proved to be safe and effective. Avoidance of emergent intervention may be achieved through a judicious elective approach to this anatomic problem. Symptom resolution and quality-of-life improvement can be safely achieved with surgical repair in this patient population, demonstrating that age is truly just a number for PEHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joslin N Cheverie
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Kai Neki
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Arielle M Lee
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Z Li
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Rebeca Dominguez-Profeta
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Tokio Matsuzaki
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Horgan et al. described the first robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy in 2003. Although there is debate regarding the oncologic appropriateness of transhiatal versus thoracic approach to esophagectomy in malignancy, comparative data are still lacking. This paper with video describes step by step how and when to perform a transhiatal robotic-assisted resection in patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Broderick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Broderick RC, Smith CD, Cheverie JN, Omelanczuk P, Lee AM, Dominguez-Profeta R, Cubas R, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Fuchs KH, Horgan S. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: a viable rescue therapy for symptomatic reflux following bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:3211-3215. [PMID: 31485930 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07096-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are commonly performed bariatric procedures in obesity management. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in this population has reported rates of 23-100%. GERD after LSG has been noted with recent studies demonstrating de novo reflux or symptom exacerbation despite weight loss. Fundoplication is not an option, and medically refractory GERD after LSG is usually treated with conversion to RYGB. GERD post-RYGB is a unique entity, and management poses a clinical and technical challenge. We evaluate safety and effectiveness of magnetic sphincter augmentation after bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed identifying patients that underwent LINX placement for refractory GERD after LSG, LRYGB, or duodenal switch across three institutions. Outcomes included complications, length of stay, PPI use, GERD-HRQL scores, and patient overall satisfaction. RESULTS From March 2014 through June 2018, 13 identified patients underwent LINX placement after bariatric surgery: 8 LSG, 4 LRYGB, and 1 duodenal switch. The patients were 77% female, with mean age 43 and average BMI 30.1. Average pre-operative DeMeester score was 24.8. Pre-operatively, 5 patients were on daily PPI, 6 on BID PPI, and 1 on PPI + H2 blocker. We noted decreased medication usage post-operatively, with 4 patients taking daily PPI, and 9 off medication completely. A GERD-HRQL score was obtained pre- and post-operatively in 6 patients with average reduction from 25 to 8.5 (p value 0.002). Two patients experienced complications requiring endoscopic dilation after LINX placement. 100% of patients reported overall satisfaction post procedure. CONCLUSION LINX placement is a safe, effective treatment option for surgical management of refractory GERD after bariatric surgery. It can relieve symptoms and obviate the requirement of high-dose medical management. Magnetic lower esophageal sphincter augmentation should be another tool in the surgeon's toolbox for managing reflux after bariatric surgery in select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | | | - Joslin N Cheverie
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Pablo Omelanczuk
- Division of Esophago-gastric and Bariatric Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Arielle M Lee
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA.
| | - Rebeca Dominguez-Profeta
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Robert Cubas
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Karl-Hermann Fuchs
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California of San Diego, MET Building, Lower Level, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC, Chang DC, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Bouvet M, Horgan S. Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30:1-6. [PMID: 26727414 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Surgery remains one of the major treatment options available to patients with esophageal cancer, with high mortality in certain cohorts. The aim of this study was to develop a simple preoperative risk scale based on patient factors, hospital factors, and tumor pathology to predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to create the risk scale. Patients who underwent open or laparoscopic transhiatal and transthoracic esophageal resection were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition codes. Patients <18 years and those with peritoneal disease were excluded. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to define a predictive model of perioperative mortality and to create a simple risk scale. From 1998 to 2011, a total of 23 751 patients underwent esophagectomy. The observed overall perioperative mortality rate for this cohort was 7.7%. Minimally invasive techniques, and operations performed in higher volume centers were protective, whereas increasing age, comorbidities and diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma were independent predictors of mortality. Based on this population, a risk scale from 0-16 was created. The calibration revealed a good agreement between the observed and risk scale-predicted probabilities. A set of sensitivity/specificity analyses was then performed to define normal (score 0-7) and high risk (score 8-16) patients for clinical practice. Mortality in patients with a score of 0-7 ranged from 1.3-7.6%, compared with 10.5-34.5% in patients with a score of 8-16. This simple preoperative risk scale may accurately predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy and can be used as a clinical tool for preoperative counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H F Fuchs
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA.,Department of General Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C R Harnsberger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - R C Broderick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - D C Chang
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA.,Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - B J Sandler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - G R Jacobsen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - M Bouvet
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology,, University of California , San Diego, California, USA
| | - S Horgan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fuchs HF, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, Divo FA, Coker AM, Jacobsen GR, Sandler BJ, Bouvet M, Horgan S. Intraoperative Endoscopic Botox Injection During Total Esophagectomy Prevents the Need for Pyloromyotomy or Dilatation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26:433-8. [PMID: 27043862 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy may lead to impairment in gastric emptying unless pyloric drainage is performed. Pyloric drainage may be technically challenging during minimally invasive esophagectomy and can add morbidity. We sought to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin into the pylorus during robotic-assisted esophagectomy as an alternative to surgical pyloric drainage. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who underwent robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (RATE) without any surgical pyloric drainage. Patients with and without intraoperative endoscopic injection of 200 units of botulinum toxin in 10 cc of saline (BOTOX group) were compared to those that did not receive any pyloric drainage (noBOTOX group). Main outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative pyloric stenosis; secondary outcomes included operative and oncologic parameters, length of stay (LOS), morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS From November 2006 to August 2014, 41 patients (6 females) with a mean age of 65 years underwent RATE without surgical drainage of the pylorus. There were 14 patients in the BOTOX group and 27 patients in the noBOTOX group. Mean operative time was not different between the comparison groups. There was one conversion to open surgery in the BOTOX group. No pyloric dysfunction occurred in the BOTOX group postoperatively, and eight stenoses in the noBOTOX group (30%) required endoscopic therapy (P < .05). There were no differences in incidence of anastomotic strictures or anastomotic leaks. One patient in group noBOTOX required pyloroplasty 3 months after esophagectomy. There was one death in the noBOTOX group postoperatively (30-day mortality 2.4%). Mean LOS was 9.6 days, and BOTOX patients were discharged earlier (7.4 versus 10.7, P < .05). CONCLUSION Intraoperative endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin into the pylorus during RATE is feasible, safe, and effective and can prevent the need for pyloromyotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans F Fuchs
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California.,2 Department of Surgery, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California
| | - Cristina R Harnsberger
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California
| | - Francisco Alvarez Divo
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California
| | - Alisa M Coker
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California.,3 VA Healthcare , San Diego, California
| | - Michael Bouvet
- 4 Department of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California
| | - Santiago Horgan
- 1 Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California , San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fuchs HF, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, Chang DC, Mclemore EC, Ramamoorthy S, Horgan S. Variation of outcome and charges in operative management for diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 2014; 29:3090-6. [PMID: 25539698 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4046-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes after surgery for diverticulitis are of continued interest to improve quality of care. The aim of this study was to assess variations in mortality, length of stay, and patient charges between geographic regions of the United States. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was performed. Adults with diverticulitis who underwent laparoscopic or open segmental colectomy were identified using ICD-9 codes. Subset analyses were performed by state and then compared. Outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Results were adjusted for age, race, gender, findings of peritonitis, stoma placement, Charlson comorbidity index, and insurance status on multivariate analysis. RESULTS 148,874 patients underwent segmental colectomy for diverticulitis from 1998 to 2010. Using California as the comparison state and after adjusting for covariates, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the State of New York (OR 1.32; 95 % CI 1.13-1.55; P < 0.05) and Mississippi (OR 2.84; 95 % CI 1.24-6.51, P < 0.02). Wisconsin had a significant lower mortality rate (OR 0.74; 95 % CI 0.59-0.94, P < 0.01). LOS was 1.4 days longer in New York and 0.54 days shorter in Wisconsin than in California (P < 0.01). Patients with age >40 years, findings of peritonitis, and without private insurance had higher in-hospital mortality and longer length of stay. Average hospital charges differed dramatically between the states in the observation period. The highest hospital charges occurred in California, Nebraska, and Nevada while lowest occurred in Maryland, Wisconsin and Utah. CONCLUSIONS Patients who undergo surgical treatment for diverticulitis in the United States have high geographic variation in mortality, LOS, and hospital charges despite adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Further analysis should be performed to identify the causes of outlier regions, with the goal of improving and standardizing best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans F Fuchs
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA. .,Department of General Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Cristina R Harnsberger
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - David C Chang
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA.,Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Elisabeth C Mclemore
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Sonia Ramamoorthy
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0740, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0740, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Broderick RC, Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR. Comparison of bariatric restrictive operations: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication. Surg Technol Int 2014; 25:82-89. [PMID: 25433175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Morbid obesity continues to increase in prevalence, becoming a major socioeconomic and medical problem. The success in treating morbid obesity with surgery has been well documented. The categories of surgical treatment include restrictive, malabsorptive, and combination operations. Two of the restrictive operations at the forefront of today's treatments are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication (LGCP). A literature review has been completed to compare the current technique and results for LSG and LGCP. LSG is a restrictive technique in which reduced gastric volume is achieved by partial greater curvature resection. The benefits of LSG include ease of operation, sustainable weight loss, and low complication rate. The disadvantages include risk for severe complications such as gastric leak and bleeding. LGCP is a novel restrictive technique which reduces gastric volume by plication of the greater curvature; it is still in the investigational stages for use in the United States. A gastric tube is formed with the plication, but no portion of the stomach is excised. The benefits of LGCP include low cost, low risk of complication, such as gastric perforation and bleeding, as well as adequate short term weight loss. The disadvantages include higher risk of nausea and vomiting post-op, a non-zero risk of perforation and bleeding, and likely an unsustainable weight loss. In comparison, LGCP is considered feasible and safe in the short term and especially suited for institutions requiring lower-cost procedures. However, LGCP weight loss may be unsustainable compared to LSG. While LSG complication rates are slightly higher, LGCP is an inferior restrictive procedure for weight loss. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long term outcomes for procedural comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Broderick
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Fellow University of California San Diego San Diego, California
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Fellow University of California San Diego San Diego, California
| | - Cristina R Harnsberger
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Fellow University of California San Diego San Diego, California
| | - Bryan J Sandler
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Fellow University of California San Diego San Diego, California
| | - Garth R Jacobsen
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Fellow University of California San Diego San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fuchs HF, Broderick RC, Harnsberger CR, Chang DC, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Horgan S. Benefits of bariatric surgery do not reach obese men. J Am Coll Surg 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.07.393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
24
|
Broderick RC, Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Chang DC, McLemore E, Ramamoorthy S, Horgan S. The price of decreased mortality in the operative management of diverticulitis. Surg Endosc 2014; 29:1185-91. [PMID: 25159639 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3791-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare costs in the United States are increasing. It is thought that as cost increases, outcomes should improve. The aim of this study was to analyze patient charges and mortality in the operative management of diverticulitis over time. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was performed. Adults with diverticulitis who underwent laparoscopic or open partial colectomy were identified by ICD-9 codes. Multivariate analyses examined in-hospital mortality and total charges. Results were adjusted for age, race, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic), and insurance status. RESULTS From 1998 to 2010, 148,348 patients had a partial colectomy for diverticulitis. After adjusting for other covariates and inflation, the average charge of hospitalization per admission increased by $34,057 from 1998 to 2010. In the same observation period, adjusted in-hospital mortality decreased significantly by 2005 compared to 1998 (p < 0.001, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88) and remained unchanged for the remainder of the study period. Additionally, laparoscopic management was associated with lower rate of charge increase compared to open management (p < 0.001), such that charges are currently higher for open management than laparoscopic. CONCLUSION In-hospital mortality following partial colectomy for diverticulitis has improved over time, most dramatically after 2005. With decreasing mortality, an increase in hospital charges is observed on an annual basis. However, while mortality reached a plateau after 2005, overall charges continue to rise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C Broderick
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zacherl J, Roy-Shapira A, Bonavina L, Bapaye A, Kiesslich R, Schoppmann SF, Kessler WR, Selzer DJ, Broderick RC, Lehman GA, Horgan S. Endoscopic anterior fundoplication with the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE™) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6-month results from a multi-center prospective trial. Surg Endosc 2014; 29:220-9. [PMID: 25135443 PMCID: PMC4293474 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3731-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2014] [Accepted: 06/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and surgical fundoplication have potential drawbacks as treatments for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This multi-center, prospective study evaluated the clinical experiences of 69 patients who received an alternative treatment: endoscopic anterior fundoplication with a video- and ultrasound-guided transoral surgical stapler. METHODS Patients with well-categorized GERD were enrolled at six international sites. Efficacy data was compared at baseline and at 6 months post-procedure. The primary endpoint was a ≥ 50 % improvement in GERD health-related quality of life (HRQL) score. Secondary endpoints were elimination or ≥ 50 % reduction in dose of PPI medication and reduction of total acid exposure on esophageal pH probe monitoring. A safety evaluation was performed at time 0 and weeks 1, 4, 12, and 6 months. RESULTS 66 patients completed follow-up. Six months after the procedure, the GERD-HRQL score improved by >50 % off PPI in 73 % (48/66) of patients (95 % CI 60-83 %). Forty-two patients (64.6 %) were no longer using daily PPI medication. Of the 23 patients who continued to take PPI following the procedure, 13 (56.5 %) reported a ≥ 50 % reduction in dose. The mean percent of total time with esophageal pH <4.0 decreased from baseline to 6 months (P < 0.001). Common adverse events were peri-operative chest discomfort and sore throat. Two severe adverse events requiring intervention occurred in the first 24 subjects, no further esophageal injury or leaks were reported in the remaining 48 enrolled subjects. CONCLUSIONS The initial 6-month data reported in this study demonstrate safety and efficacy of this endoscopic plication device. Early experience with the device necessitated procedure and device changes to improve safety, with improved results in the later portion of the study. Continued assessment of durability and safety are ongoing in a three-year follow-up study of this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Zacherl
- Department of General Surgery, Herz Jesu Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aviel Roy-Shapira
- Department of Surgery A, Soroka University Hospital, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Surgery IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan School of Medicine Director, Milan, Italy
| | - Amol Bapaye
- Department of Digestive Diseases & Endoscopy, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital & Research Center, Pune, India
| | - Ralf Kiesslich
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, St. Marienkrankenhaus Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sebastian F. Schoppmann
- Department of Surgery Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna GET-Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - William R. Kessler
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Don J. Selzer
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Ryan C. Broderick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Glen A. Lehman
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Center for the Future of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|