Differential expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor subtypes on leukocytes in systemic inflammatory response syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit and central laboratory.

PATIENTS

Blood specimens from 18 healthy volunteers (controls) and 16 patients with SIRS.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Using monoclonal antibodies, fluorescence labeling, and high sensitivity flow cytometry, we measured the expression of membrane TNF receptor subtypes TNF-R55 and TNF-R75 on peripheral blood leukocytes. Receptor expression is expressed as mean fluorescence intensity +/- SD (units: detection channel number). In controls, TNF-R55 was only weakly expressed (monocytes: 2.5+/-1.8; neutrophils: 0.7+/-0.8), whereas expression of TNF-R75 was higher (monocytes: 28.6+/-9.0; neutrophils: 4.8+/-1.0) and was also found on lymphocytes (on CD8+ lymphocytes: 5.7+/-1.8; CD16+: 5.5+/-1.2; CD4+: 9.7+/-3.7). In SIRS, we observed increased expression of TNF-R55 on monocytes (6.9+/-3.4, p<.001) and neutrophils (2.2+/-1.9, p<.01), as well as decreased expression of TNF-R75 on monocytes (17.3+/-13.2; p<.001). The extent of TNF-R55 up-regulation did not correlate with that of TNF-R75 down-regulation. TNF-R55 on monocytes and neutrophils strongly correlated with body temperature but not with survival, whereas monocyte TNF-R75 was considerably lower in nonsurvivors, albeit not significantly (12.3+/-7.1 vs. 23.9+/-16.7; p = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that leukocyte TNF-R55 and TNF-R75 react differentially and probably serve different functions in SIRS, which prompts the investigation of receptor subtype-specific therapeutic approaches.

Toward a new reference method for the leukocyte five-part differential

A flow cytometric method performing a five-part leukocyte differential based on three-color staining with anti-CD45-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), anti-CD-14-phycoerythrin (PE)/Cy5, and a cocktail of PE-labeled anti-CD2, anti-CD16, and anti-HLA-DR antibodies was evaluated. Results obtained by using three different sample preparation procedures and two different flow cytometers were compared with those of a 1,000-cell manual differential for evaluation of accuracy. We observed excellent correlations with the manual differential for all leukocyte subclasses and even higher correlations between the different flow cytometric methods. Flow cytometric basophil results were identical to the manual counts, regardless of which sample preparation technique or flow cytometer was used. Therefore, we propose our flow cytometric method as the first acceptable automated reference method for basophil counting. The flow cytometric results for the other leukocyte subclasses were apparently influenced by the sample preparation, which could not be explained by cell loss during washing steps. Moreover, a small influence of the flow cytometer was also observed. Assessing the influence of sample storage, we found only minimal changes within 24 h. In establishing reference values, high precision of flow cytometric results facilitated detection of a significantly higher monocyte count for males (relative count: 7.08 +/- 1.73% vs. 6.44 +/- 1.33%, P < 0.05; absolute count: 0.536 +/- 0.181 x 10(9)/liter vs. 0.456 +/- 139 x 10(9)/liter, P < 0.01). Our data indicate that monoclonal antibody-based flow cytometry is a highly suitable reference method for the five-part differential: It also shows, however, that studies will have to put more emphasis on methodological issues to define a method that shows a high interlaboratory reproducibility.

Value of neutrophil CD16 expression for detection of left shift and acute-phase response

Fc gamma RIII (CD16) expression of neutrophil granulocytes was measured in 156 patients by means of fluorescence-labeled antibodies with a flow cytometer. Results were compared with (1) 400-cell manual differential count; (2) left shift flagging on hematology analyzers; (3) absolute neutrophil count; and (4) acute-phase protein levels. Asynchrony was noted between neutrophil CD16 expression and microscopically defined neutrophil stage, particularly in heavily left-shifted samples, which made it impossible to reliably enumerate immature neutrophils on the basis of CD16 expression. According to receiver operating characteristics, the absolute count of CD16-negative neutrophils was highly discriminatory for detection of left shift, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.842 +/- 0.03 (SE) and maximum efficiency of 81% +/- 3%, but absolute neutrophil count was not significantly inferior (0.821 +/- 0.03 and 76% +/- 3%). STKS and SE9000 flagging demonstrated efficiency of 76% +/- 3% and 81% +/- 3%, respectively. For detection of acute-phase response, absolute neutrophil count (AUC, 0.836 +/- 0.04; maximum efficiency, 80% +/- 4%) outperformed both quantitative neutrophil CD16 expression (0.760 +/- 0.05; 75% +/- 4%) and absolute CD16-negative neutrophil count (0.757 +/- 0.05; 71% +/- 4%); absolute band count performed similarly (0.853 +/- 0.04; 79% +/- 4%) and showed high efficiency at high sensitivity and specificity. Efficiency of analyzer flagging for detection of acute-phase response was not superior to absolute neutrophil count (STKS, 77% +/- 4%; SE9000, 78% +/- 4%). In conclusion, the diagnostic value of measuring neutrophil CD16 expression was generally similar to that of less complicated analytes.

Measurements of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer patients under intermittent androgen suppression therapy

The present study evaluated serial serum measurements of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in comparison with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for assessment of tumour progression in patients with advanced prostate cancer receiving intermittent androgen suppression therapy (IAS). Twenty-three men were recruited into an IAS trial consisting of an initial 8 months of androgen suppression, followed by cycles of treatment cessation and resumption of therapy upon increases of PSA > 20 ng ml(-1) to prolong the hormone responsiveness of the tumour cells. Periods of androgen suppression resulted in reversible reduction in serum testosterone (< 1.8 nmol I(-1)) and PSA (< 4 ng ml(-1)) and decreases in tumour volume (mean reduction for first cycle 24 +/- 10%), indicating partial growth arrest and apoptotic regression of the tumours. In contrast to PSA values, non-specifically elevated TPS values were found in 8 of 23 patients. In 15 of 23 patients, TPS fell during periods of apoptotic tumour regression and increased simultaneously with testosterone and preceded the increases in PSA by 2 months during the period of treatment cessation. Although TPS represents a highly sensitive marker of tumour proliferation in this IAS clinical model of controlled tumour regression and regrowth, its low specificity compared with PSA limits its usefulness to monitoring of prostate cancer patients with proven absence of non-specific elevations of this marker.

Proposed reference method for peripheral-blood monocyte counting using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies

Flow cytometry using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies has been proposed as a possible new reference method to evaluate the monocyte counting performance of automated hematology analyzers. Since in previous studies only one such technique was applied, we investigated how different flow cytometric techniques compared to the manual differential and a hematology analyzer. Relative monocyte counts of 60 samples of the daily routine were determined on a Coulter Profile II flow cytometer after incubation with two different CD45-FITC/CD 14-PE antibody combinations and subsequent preparation with two whole-blood lysis techniques, including one no-wash technique. Results were compared to those of a 600-cell manual differential and to those of the Coulter STKS hematology analyzer. All flow cytometric methods correlated very well with the manual differential (r > or = 0.925) and none showed a significant bias. The Coulter STKS relative monocyte counts were slightly higher than those of the manual differential (8.76% vs. 8.18%). The correlations between the methods employing monoclonal antibodies were excellent (r > or = 0.995) and the mean monocyte counts identical although a small, non-systematic influence of sample preparation techniques was noted. An influence of the antibody clones was not observed. The precision of the Profile II results was far superior to that of the manual differential and the STKS. Our data show that flow cytometry employing fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies is a potentially ideal new reference method for monocyte counting. However, they also show that establishing a new reference method will require extensive investigation and exact definition of the sample preparation procedure to be used.

Evaluation of automated basophil counting by using fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies

The shortcomings of current methods of basophil enumeration detract from the clinical value of the basophil count. Moreover, sophisticated and costly techniques of automated basophil counting hardly can be validated for lack of a suitable reference method. We investigated whether a flow cytometric technique using double staining with fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies (mAb) CD45-FITC and CD14-PE on a Coulter Epics Profile II could be used to evaluate basophil counting performance of hematology analyzers. The technique was compared with the 800-cell manual differential, the Coulter STKS, and the Cobas Argos 5 Diff. Precision: STKS, Argos and Profile II showed a precision analogous to a 2,173, 2,250-, and 14,705-cell differential, respectively, illustrating the superiority of automated methods. Accuracy (150 normal and abnormal samples): Using the Profile II as reference the STKS showed a notably weaker correlation than the Argos (r = 0.581 and 0.718, respectively), although this difference was nearly concealed when the imprecise manual differential served as reference (r = 0.517 and 0.562, respectively). The Profile II correlated relatively well with the manual differential (r = 0.730). Analyzing 137 healthy adult subjects, we obtained a reference range of 0.33 to 1.35% (0.020 to 0.102 x 10(9) basophils/L) for the mAb-based method. These data would recommend mAb-based basophil counting as a valuable tool for instrument evaluation. However, an observed bias of 0.09% against the manual differential suggests that modifications are necessary before this technique can be considered as new reference method.

Peripheral blood monocyte counting: towards a new reference method

Flow cytometric enumeration of monocytes stained with fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies has been proposed as a possible reference method for monocyte counting. We compared precision and accuracy of monocyte counting of the Coulter STKS, the Cobas Argos 5 Diff, the 800-cell manual differential, and the Coulter Epics Profile II flow cytometer using double-staining with fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies (CD45-FITC and CD14-PE). Precision: STKS, Argos and Profile II achieved a precision analogous to a 3423-, 1298-, and 11089-cell differential, respectively, confirming the superiority of automated methods. Accuracy (136 normal and abnormal samples): Correlation of automated methods with the manual differential was good (STKS: r = 0.934, Argos 5 Diff: r = 0.808, Profile II: r = 0.924; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). The mean relative STKS monocyte result was 0.52 +/- 1.63% (mean +/- SD) higher than the manual differential, whereas the Argos 5 Diff results were 1.22 +/- 2.51% lower (p < 0.001). Profile II results showed a small bias against the manual differential (-0.18 +/- 1.44%, p < 0.05). Analysing 135 healthy adult subjects on the Profile II, males were found to have a higher mean monocyte count (relative count: 6.95 +/- 1.43% vs. 5.86 +/- 0.98%; absolute count: 0.48 +/- 0.15 x 10(9)/l vs. 0.39 +/- 0.11 x 10(9)/l, p < 0.001) and a higher and wider normal range than females (relative count: 4.97 to 9.78% vs. 4.26 to 7.81%, absolute count: 0.30 to 0.84 x 10(9)/l vs. 0.25 to 0.65 x 10(9)/l). Flow cytometry based on fluorescence-labelled monoclonal antibodies for monocyte enumeration seems an efficient tool to evaluate the monocyte counting performance of haematology analysers and an ideal successor to the manual differential as reference method for monocyte counting.

Monitoring of mononuclear cell subsets isolated from the coronary sinus and the right atrium in patients after heart allograft transplantation

The rejection of a transplanted heart leads to an accumulation of mononuclear cells in the cardiac tissue and to reactions of the antigen-recognizing cells with the foreign tissue. Consequently, during rejections immunologic changes, such as the number of mononuclear cells and the patterns of mononuclear cell subpopulations, should be detectable by analysis of mononuclear cells from the coronary sinus of transplanted hearts. Seventy-nine endomyocardial biopsies were performed in 37 patients. Severity of graft rejection was classified by the Billingham scheme. Thirty-two biopsy specimens showed no rejection, 33 mild, and 14 moderate rejection. After endomyocardial biopsy the coronary sinus was catheterized under x-ray guidance. Heparinized blood samples were obtained from the coronary sinus and the right atrium, and mononuclear cell counts and subpopulation pattern were compared. Patients without rejection and patients with mild rejection showed no significant differences in the patterns of mononuclear cell subpopulation identified in right atrium blood. However, a significant (1.56-fold) increase of mononuclear cells was assessed in the CS blood (p less than 0.01). Moderate rejections showed a 4.2-fold augmentation of mononuclear cells in the coronary sinus (p less than 0.005) compared with nonrejections. In addition, the T-helper/inducer (CD4) percentage increased from 27.1% in the right atrium to 41.2% in the coronary sinus (p less than 0.005), natural killer cells (CD16) from 17.7% to 31.8% (p less than 0.005), and the interleukin 2 receptor-bearing cells from 6.6% to 15.3% (p less than 0.005). Percentage of pan-T cells (CD3), T-cytotoxic/suppressor cells (CD8), and monocytes (CD14) showed no statistically significant changes. These findings correlated with grading according to endomyocardial biopsy. Using the ratio of values obtained from cells of the coronary sinus and the right atrium rendered the coronary sinus immunologic monitoring independent of changes in the administered immunosuppressive regimen. The specificity of the described method was as good as that of endomyocardial biopsy. It is concluded that the discrimination of the patterns of mononuclear cell subpopulations from right atrium versus coronary sinus blood samples is highly sensitive and allows the correct diagnosis of graft rejection within 1 to 2 hours.