1
|
O’Connell Francischetto E, Jones J, Allen K, Combes G, Damery S. 683 UNDERSTANDING HOW DISCHARGE SERVICES FOR OLDER PATIENTS CAN BRIDGE THE GAP BETWEEN HOSPITAL, COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL CARE. Age Ageing 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac035.683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
UK policy recommends that discharge support is provided by hospital, community and social care staff. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding how these multiagency hospital discharge services work in practice, how they can be sustained and what service stakeholder experiences of them are. This research aimed to understand how integrated discharge services work and the views and experiences of stakeholders.
Method
A qualitative case study of a supported integrated hospital discharge service (SIHDS) for older people was undertaken, which involved interviews with service staff (hospital, community and social care), patients and carers. Staff, patients and carers were interviewed on their experiences of SIHDS. Staff also took part in a process mapping exercise to understand how the service works. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained for this research.
Results
A variety of staff (n = 14) and patients aged over 60 years (n = 11) and their informal carers/family members (n = 4) were interviewed. Three main staff themes emerged from the findings: 1. Preparedness for discharge and impact of discharge service; 2. Integration and impact on patient pathway and 3. Organisational aspects. The three main patient/carer themes were: 1. Support for patients; 2. Patient Outcomes and 3. Information exchange. The findings demonstrated that: SIHDS was seen as important to allow patients to be discharged home in a timely and safe manner; that communication is important at all levels of a SIHDS and SIHDS need to continuously evolve to provide patient centred care.
Conclusion
The findings from this qualitative case study allow the complexities involved in SIHDS to be understood from the experiences and perspectives of multiagency staff, patients and carers. It shows SIHDS are complex, but useful to overcome gaps between services. However, to effectively sustain a patient centred service it is important to regularly review and develop SIHDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E O’Connell Francischetto
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - J Jones
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - K Allen
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - G Combes
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - S Damery
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O’Connell Francischetto E, Jones J, Davies S, Allen K, Combes G, Damery S. 682 IMPACT OF DISCHARGE INTERVENTIONS FOR OLDER PATIENTS LEAVING HOSPITAL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REVIEWS. Age Ageing 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac036.682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The UK has an aging population and there is an increasing need for additional care and support services for elderly patients discharged from hospital. Despite a large evidence base on different discharge services there is inconsistent findings on their effectiveness. This systematic review of reviews aimed to evaluate the impact of a variety of discharge interventions on older people leaving hospital.
Method
Ten databases were searched (including Medline and The Cochrane Library) using multiple key search terms related to ‘systematic reviews’, ‘older people’ and ‘discharge’. Only systematic reviews of interventions for people aged over 60 years that provided additional support or adapted their discharge processes were included. Outcomes of interest included mortality, readmissions, length of hospital stay, patient health status and costs. Abstract, title and full-text screening was conducted independently by two reviewers. Interventions were categorised by intervention type and a narrative synthesis was conducted on data extracted.
Results
Of the 8,748 title and abstracts reviewed, 859 full texts were assessed for eligibility, of these 91 were taken forward to quality assessment and 66 moderate or high-quality reviews were included in the final synthesis. Interventions were categorised into 10 types and had varying impact on outcomes. A statistically significant positive impact on the outcomes of interest was found for: Interventions providing ‘rehabilitation, therapy or care at home (or in the community) around the time of discharge’ reducing length of stay; ‘primary care interventions’, ‘Discharge planning/coordination or case management’ and ‘patient education’.
Conclusion
This systematic review of reviews shows that different types and configurations of discharge interventions can benefit older patients in multiple ways when compared to usual care and highlights which intervention types make no difference or have negative impacts. These findings will help to inform the development of new discharge interventions and the direction of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E O’Connell Francischetto
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - J Jones
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - S Davies
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - K Allen
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - G Combes
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| | - S Damery
- Prevention, Wellbeing and Communities Hub, Gloucestershire County Council & Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust; Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham; Applied Research Collaborations (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parry H, McIlroy G, Bruton R, Ali M, Stephens C, Damery S, Otter A, McSkeane T, Rolfe H, Faustini S, Wall N, Hillmen P, Pratt G, Paneesha S, Zuo J, Richter A, Moss P. Antibody responses after first and second Covid-19 vaccination in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Blood Cancer J 2021; 11:136. [PMID: 34330895 PMCID: PMC8323747 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00528-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is associated with immunosuppression and patients are at increased clinical risk following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Covid-19 vaccines offer the potential for protection against severe infection but relatively little is known regarding the profile of the antibody response following first or second vaccination. We studied spike-specific antibody responses following first and/or second Covid-19 vaccination in 299 patients with CLL compared with healthy donors. 286 patients underwent extended interval (10-12 week) vaccination. 154 patients received the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and 145 patients received ChAdOx1. Blood samples were taken either by venepuncture or as dried blood spots on filter paper. Spike-specific antibody responses were detectable in 34% of patients with CLL after one vaccine (n = 267) compared to 94% in healthy donors with antibody titres 104-fold lower in the patient group. Antibody responses increased to 75% after second vaccine (n = 55), compared to 100% in healthy donors, although titres remained lower. Multivariate analysis showed that current treatment with BTK inhibitors or IgA deficiency were independently associated with failure to generate an antibody response after the second vaccine. This work supports the need for optimisation of vaccination strategy in patients with CLL including the potential utility of booster vaccines.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Viral/blood
- Antibodies, Viral/immunology
- Antibody Formation/drug effects
- BNT162 Vaccine
- COVID-19/blood
- COVID-19/immunology
- COVID-19/prevention & control
- COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage
- COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology
- Female
- Humans
- Immunization, Secondary
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/blood
- Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/immunology
- Male
- Middle Aged
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Parry
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - G McIlroy
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - R Bruton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - M Ali
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - C Stephens
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - S Damery
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - A Otter
- National infection Service, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 OJG, UK
| | - T McSkeane
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK
| | - H Rolfe
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Faustini
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - N Wall
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - P Hillmen
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - G Pratt
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - S Paneesha
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Bordesley Green East, B9 5SS, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Zuo
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - A Richter
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - P Moss
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parry HM, Damery S, Mudondo NP, Hazlewood P, McSkeane T, Aung S, Murray J, Pratt G, Moss P, Milligan DW. Primary care management of early stage chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is safe and effective. QJM 2015; 108:789-94. [PMID: 25638788 PMCID: PMC4586947 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcv017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Revised: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the commonest leukaemia in western society. Most patients are detected incidentally at an early stage and require 'watch and wait' follow-up. In the UK, management of Stage A0 CLL varies with some centres advising regular outpatient haematology follow-up, whereas others recommend management within primary care. The safety and effectiveness of these two management options are currently unknown. METHODS An observational retrospective cohort study in outpatient Haematology clinics at Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEH) and Birmingham Heartlands Hospital (BHH) and primary care practices in West Midlands, UK. All patients diagnosed with stable stage A0 CLL since 2002 at BHH or QEH were identified. At BHH, patients were discharged to primary care follow-up, whilst QEH patients remained under haematology for follow-up. Evidence of disease progression, need for treatment and overall mortality was documented. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-six Stage A0 CLL patients were identified. One hundred and five (43%) patients were discharged to primary care, whilst 141 (57%) patients were followed up in haematology outpatient clinics. No difference in mortality or need for treatment was found between the two groups. Of those discharged, 93 (66%) remained in primary care. CONCLUSION The management of stable-stage A0 CLL within primary or secondary care leads to equivalent clinical outcomes. The prevalence of early-stage CLL is expected to increase with the ageing population and management within primary care should be considered as a potentially effective approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Damery
- School of Primary Care Clinical Sciences
| | - N P Mudondo
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands B15 2TT, UK
| | | | | | - S Aung
- Centre for Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands B9 5SS, UK and
| | - J Murray
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Morris House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands B15 2TH, UK
| | - G Pratt
- Centre for Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands B9 5SS, UK and
| | | | - D W Milligan
- Centre for Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands B9 5SS, UK and
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Damery S, Biswas M, Billingham L, Barton P, Al-Janabi H, Grimer R. Patient preferences for clinical follow-up after primary treatment for soft tissue sarcoma: a cross-sectional survey and discrete choice experiment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:1655-61. [PMID: 25108811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients treated for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) require long-term follow-up to detect recurrent or metastatic disease, yet marked differences exist in clinical approaches to the length of follow-up, frequency of consultations and investigations undertaken at follow-up visits. There has been no published work assessing patient expectations or the acceptability of post-treatment follow-up strategies. This study aimed to assess the patient acceptability of different follow-up strategies following curative surgery for soft tissue sarcoma and to investigate the hypothetical levels of recurrence risk at which different follow-up regimes were acceptable. METHODS Patients were recruited from the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital in Birmingham. The study used a cross-sectional survey incorporating a best-worst scaling discrete choice experiment to assess patient preferences regarding different aspects of follow-up. RESULTS 132 patients participated (47% response). The nature of investigations undertaken during follow-up was the most important aspect of post-surgical care. Patients typically preferred appointments routinely consisting of clinical examination and chest X-ray, and for follow-up to remain in secondary care rather than general practice. CONCLUSION Clear protocols for STS patient follow-up can improve consistency and equity of care. In determining the optimum follow-up plan for STS patients from the patient perspective, this study provides valuable information that should be considered alongside the clinical effectiveness of follow-up strategies to maximise patient outcomes and use NHS resources appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Damery
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - M Biswas
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit and MRC Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - L Billingham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit and MRC Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - P Barton
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - H Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - R Grimer
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shneerson C, Taskila T, Holder R, Greenfield S, Tolosa I, Damery S, Gale N. Patterns of self-management practices undertaken by cancer survivors: variations in demographic factors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2014; 24:683-94. [PMID: 25265011 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The study purpose was to examine self-management (SM) use among cancer survivors; and to explore variations in uptake of SM in survivorship and whether these differed in relation to age, income, gender, ethnicity, cancer type and treatment type. This is an important area for exploration as SM utilisation has the potential to impact on the health status, health behaviours and quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors. A postal survey was conducted among 445 cancer survivors identified from a hospital in the West Midlands, UK. Demographic data were collected and respondents were asked to identify which practices across six SM categories - diet, exercise, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), psychological therapies, support groups and spirituality/religion - they had used (if any). The findings indicate that the large majority (91%) had used some form of SM after their cancer treatment. Exercise (84%) and diet (56%) were the most popular SM interventions for cancer survivors and socio-demographic and cancer-related factors were associated with SM uptake. These findings can form the basis for designing and implementing appropriate SM interventions aimed at improving the health, well-being and QoL of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Shneerson
- Public Health Building, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Taskila
- The Work Foundation, Centre for Workforce Effectiveness (Part of Lancaster University), London, UK
| | - R Holder
- Medical Statistician Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Greenfield
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Tolosa
- Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Nuffield House, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Damery
- School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - N Gale
- HSMC, Park House, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ward ST, Weston CJ, Hepburn E, Damery S, Hejmadi RK, Morton DG, Middleton G, Ismail T, Adams DH. Evaluation of serum lysyl oxidase as a blood test for colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 40:731-8. [PMID: 24246612 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2013] [Revised: 10/21/2013] [Accepted: 10/26/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Lysyl oxidase (LOX) expression is elevated in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue and associated with disease progression. A blood test may form a more acceptable diagnostic test for CRC although LOX has not previously been measured in the serum. We therefore sought to determine the clinical usefulness of a serum LOX test for CRC in a symptomatic population. METHODS Adult patients referred to a hospital colorectal clinic with bowel symptoms completed a questionnaire and provided a blood sample for serum LOX measurement. Associations between presenting symptoms, serum LOX concentrations and outcomes of investigations were tested by univariate and multivariate analyses to determine if serum LOX was clinically useful in the prediction of CRC. LOX expression in CRC and adjacent colon biopsies was evaluated by ELISA and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Thirty-one cases of colorectal cancer and 16 high-risk polyps were identified from a total of 962 participants. There was no association between serum LOX concentration and the presence of CRC, high-risk polyps or cancers at any site. LOX expression was significantly increased in CRC tissue compared to adjacent colon. CONCLUSION Despite overexpression of LOX in CRC tissue, elevated serum levels could not be demonstrated. Serum LOX measurement is therefore not a clinically useful test for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S T Ward
- NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK.
| | - C J Weston
- NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - E Hepburn
- NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - S Damery
- NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - R K Hejmadi
- University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - D G Morton
- NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - G Middleton
- NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - T Ismail
- University Hospitals Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - D H Adams
- NIHR Biomedical Research Unit and Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Damery S, Ryan R, McManus RJ, Warmington S, Draper H, Wilson S. The effect of seeking consent on the representativeness of patient cohorts: iron-deficiency anaemia and colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13:e366-73. [PMID: 21831101 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02724.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
AIM The study aimed to establish the level of selection bias that may occur should individual patient consent be sought, by comparing characteristics of consenters and nonconsenters to a request for access to medical records within a cohort of patients diagnosed with iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA). METHOD A cohort study and cross-sectional survey was carried out of consent preferences that compared the sociodemographic characteristics of patients providing or not providing consent for access to their records, the consent rates by participant subgroup and the predictors of consent/nonconsent. RESULTS Of 599 patients mailed requesting consent for access to their medical records, 425 (71.0%) responses were received. Of the valid responses, explicit consent was granted by 371 (62.7%) respondents, with 47 (7.9%) refusals. The characteristics of consenters and nonconsenters differed with regard to age, gender and deprivation quartile. Nonconsent was associated with younger age (40-60 years vs 60 + years; bivariate OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.01-4.02), female gender (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.13-2.34) and being socioeconomically deprived (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.15-2.26). CONCLUSION The current research governance framework demonstrates a conflict between protecting the rights of the individual and the development of a sound research base to improve the delivery of healthcare services for society as a whole. If epidemiological research includes data only from individuals who have given consent for access to their records, the resulting selection bias may have consequences for the scientific validity and generalizability of research findings, and ultimately the quality of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Damery
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands B15 2TT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parry HM, Damery S, Fergusson A, Draper H, Bion J, Low AE. Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 in a critical care and theatre setting: beliefs and attitudes towards staff vaccination. J Hosp Infect 2011; 78:302-7. [PMID: 21481491 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2010] [Accepted: 02/17/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
West Midlands was particularly affected by the 2009 H1N1 influenza A (pH1N1) pandemic. Vaccination of frontline healthcare professionals (HCPs) aimed to prevent spread to vulnerable patients, minimise service disruption and protect staff. HCPs involved in upper airway management are particularly at risk of aerosol exposure. We assessed the attitudes of these HCPs towards pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccination uptake: primary reasons for acceptance, barriers to vaccination, and knowledge surrounding pH1N1 influenza. We performed a voluntary, anonymous questionnaire survey based in two West Midlands National Health Service Trusts, one month after introduction of the vaccine. In all, 187 useable responses were received (60.5% response rate); 43.8% (N=82) had/intended to receive vaccination. Concern over long term side-effects was the main deterrent (37.4%, N=70). Primary reasons for potentially accepting vaccination were: to protect themselves (36.9%, N=69), to protect family (35.3%, N=66), and to protect patients (10.2%, N=19). Of responders, 76.5% were unsure that the vaccines had undergone suitably rigorous clinical trials to ensure safety; 20.9% correctly identified reported vaccine efficacy. We conclude that pH1N1 vaccination uptake among high risk HCPs remained low, although twice that of peak seasonal influenza vaccination rates. HCPs' knowledge of vaccine efficacy is poor. Barriers to vaccination include concerns over safety profile given the short chronological time-span between the pandemic being declared and vaccine introduction. Side-effects, both acute and chronic, are a significant barrier to vaccination. Further reassurance/education surrounding vaccine safety/efficacy at the time of any future pandemic may improve uptake rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Parry
- Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
AIM The extent to which different referral pathways following a primary care diagnosis of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) are associated with delay in diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) was determined. METHOD Eligible patients aged 40 or more years, with IDA diagnosed in primary care, and a subsequent diagnosis of CRC, were studied retrospectively. Referral pathways were identified using the specialty of first recorded GP referral following IDA diagnosis. Differences in time to diagnosis of CRC were assessed by referral specialty. Differences in the proportion of cases referred before and after the re-issue of the NICE urgent referral guidelines for suspected lower gastrointestinal (GI) cancer were also assessed. RESULTS Of 628,882 eligible patients, 3.1% (n = 19,349) were diagnosed with IDA during the study period; 3.0% (n = 578) were subsequently diagnosed with CRC. Two hundred and fifty-nine (44.8%) patients had no recorded referral or a referral unrelated to anaemia or the GI tract. Only 35% (n = 201) of patients were referred to a relevant specialty. Median time to CRC diagnosis ranged from 2.5 months (referral to a relevant surgical specialty) to 31.9 months (haematology). Time to diagnosis was longer in patients referred to a medical compared with a relevant surgical specialty (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in time to CRC diagnosis before and after the NICE guidelines were re-issued in 2005. CONCLUSION Significant differences exist between referral specialties in time to CRC diagnosis following a primary care diagnosis of IDA. Despite NICE referral recommendations, a significant proportion of patients are still not managed within recommended care pathways to CRC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Damery
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mistry A, Wilson S, Priestman T, Damery S, Haque M. How do the information needs of cancer patients differ at different stages of the cancer journey? A cross-sectional survey. JRSM Short Rep 2010; 1:30. [PMID: 21103122 PMCID: PMC2984359 DOI: 10.1258/shorts.2010.010032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Providing information to cancer patients can have significant benefits to their psychological wellbeing. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how information needs may differ for patients at different stages of the cancer journey. Design Cross-sectional, self-completed survey using convenience sampling. Setting Oncology outpatients in Wolverhampton, West Midlands. Participants Cancer patients aged 18 years and over. Main outcome measures The survey used Likert scales to determine whether patients wished to know more about 35 items of information categorized under seven domains: cancer (diagnosis); prognosis; treatment; rehabilitation; psychological/spiritual; social/family; and body image/sexuality. Each domain was scored, with higher scores indicating a greater wish for information. Results There were 187 participants (50% response rate). Patients tended to want more information, particularly related to prognosis. Post-treatment patients continued to have information needs comparable to patients undergoing treatment or at the pre-treatment stage, except with reference to treatment-related information (p = <0.01), although as time from diagnosis increased, information needs reduced. Educational attainment, age, treatment status, gender and ethnicity were all significant predictors of scores in various domains. Conclusion This study indicates that the time since diagnosis may interact with various demographic and disease-related factors in contributing to the information needs of cancer patients. The majority of cancer patients wish to know more about a wide range of factors, and such information seeking preferences are present regardless of an individual's stage following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mistry
- School of Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Damery S, Draper H, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Ives J, Parry J, Petts J, Sorell T. Healthcare workers' perceptions of the duty to work during an influenza pandemic. J Med Ethics 2010; 36:12-18. [PMID: 20026687 DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.032821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are often assumed to have a duty to work, even if faced with personal risk. This is particularly so for professionals (doctors and nurses). However, the health service also depends on non-professionals, such as porters, cooks and cleaners. The duty to work is currently under scrutiny because of the ongoing challenge of responding to pandemic influenza, where an effective response depends on most uninfected HCWs continuing to work, despite personal risk. This paper reports findings of a survey of HCWs (n = 1032) conducted across three National Health Service trusts in the West Midlands, UK, to establish whether HCWs' likelihood of working during a pandemic is associated with views about the duty to work. The sense that HCWs felt that they had a duty to work despite personal risk emerged strongly regardless of professional status. Besides a strong sense that everyone should pull together, all kinds of HCWs recognised a duty to work even in difficult circumstances, which correlated strongly with their stated likelihood of working. This suggests that HCWs' decisions about whether or not they are prepared to work during a pandemic are closely linked to their sense of duty. However, respondents' sense of the duty to work may conflict with their sense of duty to family, as well as other factors such as a perceived lack of reciprocity from their employers. Interestingly, nearly 25% of doctors did not consider that they had a duty to work where doing so would pose risks to themselves or their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Damery
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gratus C, Damery S, Wilson S, Warmington S, Routledge P, Grieve R, Steven N, Jones J, Greenfield S. The use of herbal medicines by people with cancer in the UK: a systematic review of the literature. QJM 2009; 102:831-42. [PMID: 19797394 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Little is known about the use of herbal medicines by people living with cancer in the UK. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence of herbal medicine use by this group, the characteristics of users, factors motivating use, and attitudes towards herbal remedies. DESIGN AND METHODS Fifteen electronic databases were searched. People who were research-active in the field were contacted and asked about further published or unpublished work. All studies identified as relevant to the purpose of the review were assessed. Searches were not restricted by publication type or date. RESULTS Of 1288 unique references identified, 11 met the eligibility criteria. Studies were excluded where research had been conducted outside the UK; where information on herbal medicine use was not differentiated from that relating to complementary and alternative therapies more broadly, and where neither prevalence of use nor information on user characteristics was included. Prevalence estimates ranged from 3.1 to 24.9%. Most studies did not obtain information specifically on herbal medicines and only one examined the characteristics and motivations of users of herbal medicines as distinct from complementary and alternative therapies in general. CONCLUSION The high degree of heterogeneity of methodology, sample selection and characteristics, and research design resulted in a wide range of estimates of prevalence. Well-designed research is needed to define the evidence base about the herbal medicines taken by people with cancer in the UK, the reasons for use, knowledge about possible effects and potential risks, and where people seek information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gratus
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- H. Draper
- Biomedical Ethics Primary Care Clinical Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - J. Ives
- Behavioural Science Primary Care Clinical Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - H. Pall
- Neurology Division of Neuroscience, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - S. Smith
- School of Law, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - S. Damery
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - S. Wilson
- The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Draper H, Sorell T, Ives J, Damery S, Greenfield S, Parry J, Petts J, Wilson S. Non-Professional Healthcare Workers and Ethical Obligations to Work during Pandemic Influenza. Public Health Ethics 2009. [DOI: 10.1093/phe/php021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
16
|
Taskila T, Wilson S, Damery S, Roalfe A, Redman V, Ismail T, Hobbs R. Factors affecting attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening in the primary care population. Br J Cancer 2009; 101:250-5. [PMID: 19550423 PMCID: PMC2720207 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of death in the United Kingdom. Regular screening could significantly reduce CRC-related morbidity and mortality. However, screening programmes in the United Kingdom have to date seen uptake rates of less than 60%. Attitudes towards screening are the primary factors determining patient uptake. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to people aged 50–69 years who were registered with general practices in the West Midlands. A total of 11 355 people (53%) completed the questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify those factors (gender, age, ethnicity, deprivation, number of symptoms, and their duration) that most strongly contributed to negative/positive attitudes in the primary care population. Results: Fourteen percent of respondents had a negative attitude towards screening. Men, older people, and those with Indian ethnic backgrounds were more likely to have negative attitudes toward screening, whereas people with Black-Caribbean ethnic background, people with multiple symptoms and those reporting abdominal pain, bleeding, and tiredness were more likely to have a positive attitude. Conclusion: Culturally relevant screening strategies should aim to increase knowledge of the symptoms and signs related to bowel cancer among South Asian ethnic groups in the United Kingdom. It is also important to find ways to increase the acceptability of screening among asymptomatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Taskila
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|