A Phase Ib Expansion Cohort Evaluating Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib and Dual TORC1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

This study further evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of alisertib and sapanisertib in an expansion cohort of patients, including a subset of patients with refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with further evaluation of the pharmacodynamic characteristics of combination therapy.

METHODS

Twenty patients with refractory solid tumors and 11 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of alisertib and sapanisertib. Adverse events and disease response were assessed. Patients in the expansion cohort were treated with a 7-day lead-in of either alisertib or sapanisertib prior to combination therapy, with tumor tissue biopsy and serial functional imaging performed for correlative analysis.

RESULTS

Toxicity across treatment groups was overall similar to prior studies. One partial response to treatment was observed in a patient with ER positive breast cancer, and a patient with pancreatic cancer experienced prolonged stable disease. In an additional cohort of pancreatic cancer patients, treatment response was modest. Correlative analysis revealed variability in markers of apoptosis and immune cell infiltrate according to lead-in therapy and response.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual targeting of Aurora A kinase and mTOR resulted in marginal clinical benefit in a population of patients with refractory solid tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, though individual patients experienced significant response to therapy. Correlatives indicate apoptotic response and tumor immune cell infiltrate may affect clinical outcomes.

First-in-Human Dose-Escalation Study of the Novel Oral Depsipeptide Class I-Targeting HDAC Inhibitor Bocodepsin (OKI-179) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

(1) Background: Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a critical role in epigenetic signaling in cancer; however, available HDAC inhibitors have limited therapeutic windows and suboptimal pharmacokinetics (PK). This first-in-human phase I dose escalation study evaluated the safety, PK, pharmacodynamics (PDx), and efficacy of the oral Class I-targeting HDAC inhibitor bocodepsin (OKI-179). (2) Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 34) with advanced solid tumors were treated with OKI-179 orally once daily in three schedules: 4 days on 3 days off (4:3), 5 days on 2 days off (5:2), or continuous in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Single-patient escalation cohorts followed a standard 3 + 3 design. (3) Results: The mean duration of treatment was 81.2 (range 11-447) days. The most frequent adverse events in all patients were nausea (70.6%), fatigue (47.1%), and thrombocytopenia (41.2%). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OKI-179 was 450 mg with 4:3 and 200 mg with continuous dosing. Dose-limiting toxicities included decreased platelet count and nausea. Prolonged disease control was observed, including two patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Systemic exposure to the active metabolite exceeded the preclinical efficacy threshold at doses lower than the MTD and was temporally associated with increased histone acetylation in circulating T cells. (4) Conclusions: OKI-179 has a manageable safety profile at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 300 mg daily on a 4:3 schedule with prophylactic oral antiemetics. OKI-179 is currently being investigated with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with NRAS-mutated melanoma in the phase 2 Nautilus trial.

Silmitasertib plus gemcitabine and cisplatin first-line therapy in locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase 1b/2 study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to investigate safety and efficacy of silmitasertib, an oral small molecule casein kinase 2 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (G+C) versus G+C in locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This work is a Phase 1b/2 study (S4-13-001). In Phase 2, patients received silmitasertib 1000 mg twice daily for 10 days with G+C on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the modified intent-to-treat population (defined as patients who completed at least one cycle of silmitasertib without dose interruption/reduction) from both phases (silmitasertib/G+C n = 55, G+C n = 29). The response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. The median PFS was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6, 14.7) versus 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.1, not evaluable [NE]) ( p  = 0.0496); 10-month PFS was 56.1% (95% CI, 38.8%, 70.2%) versus 22.2% (95% CI, 1.8%, 56.7%); and median overall survival was 17.4 months (95% CI, 13.4, 25.7) versus 14.9 months (95% CI, 9.9, NE) with silmitasertib/G+C versus G+C. Overall response rate was 34.0% versus 30.8%; the disease control rate was 86.0% versus 88.5% with silmitasertib/G+C versus G+C. Almost all silmitasertib/G+C (99%) and G+C (93%) patients reported at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (all grades) with silmitasertib/G+C versus G+C were diarrhea (70% versus 13%), nausea (59% vs. 30%), fatigue (47% vs. 47%), vomiting (39% vs. 7%), and anemia (39% vs. 30%). Twelve patients (10%) discontinued treatment because of TEAEs during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Silmitasertib/G+C demonstrated promising preliminary evidence of efficacy for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Impact of early-onset colorectal cancer on utilization of chemotherapy and outcomes in patients with stage II disease

85

Background: Rising rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) pose a dilemma for clinicians when deciding how to treat early-stage patients to maximize outcomes. While standard-of-care for Stage II colon cancer is largely surgical resection, evidence suggests that treatment selection may differ by patient age. We sought to determine whether rates of adjuvant chemotherapy administration differ between early and later-onset patients with Stage II CRC. Methods: Data were derived from the Flatiron National Database spanning 1/1/2003 to 8/1/2021. Patients 18 years or older with Stage II CRC were grouped into those aged 18-49 (EOCRC) and those aged 50 or older (LOCRC). Demographic characteristics, ECOG score, stage and site of tumor, and chemotherapy were included for all patients. Primary outcomes of interest included rates of adjuvant chemotherapy administration by age and ethnicity. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate relationships between chemotherapy administration, age groups, and ethnicity while adjusting for significant covariates. Results: Of 2133 patients with Stage II CRC, 1606 patients with complete data were included. A secondary analysis of 1065 patients with colon cancer was performed to address potential confounding factors related to neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy given in patients with stage II rectal cancer. Mean age of EOCRC patients was 45.0 years (range: 41.0-48.0) vs. 68.0 years (60.0-75.0) for LOCRC. Adjusting for ethnicity, gender, site, and ECOG score, multivariate analysis showed EOCRC patients received chemotherapy significantly more often than LOCRC patients for stage II CRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.85, 95% CI 1.32-2.60, p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in the colon cancer only cohort (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.31-3.09, p < 0.001). By ethnicity, non-Hispanic patients received chemotherapy at significantly lower rates than Hispanic patients in both cohorts (adjusted odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.88, p = 0.009 and adjusted odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.91, p = 0.018). In a subgroup analysis of Stage IIA patients, multivariate logistic regression adjusting for gender, ECOG, site, and ethnicity showed that patients with EOCRC were more likely to receive chemotherapy than patients with LOCRC (adjusted odds ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.21-2.99, p = 0.005). Updated survival data will be presented. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy is given preferentially in Stage II EOCRC, even in Stage IIA disease, despite deviation from established guidelines. This may expose patients at low risk for recurrence to unnecessary toxicities and reveals potential provider bias in favor of younger patients in aggressively treating CRC, despite unclear evidence for any outcome benefit.

Trial in progress: A phase II study (with safety run-in) of evorpacept (ALX148), cetuximab, and pembrolizumab in patients with refractory microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer (AGICC-ALX148 21CRC01)

TPS257

Background: Refractory microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC) is immunologically cold and single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drugs are ineffective; novel immune-based approaches are needed. Evorpacept (E, ALX148) is an engineered protein (high-affinity CD47-blocker fused to an inactive IgG Fc region), which blocks the CD47/SIRPα innate immune inhibitory phagocytosis checkpoint expressed on CRC and phagocytes, respectively. The Fc region of E does not bind to Fcγ receptors, thereby limiting hematologic toxicity, and is intended to be given in combination. In CT26 CRC syngeneic models, E ± anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody decreases tumor growth, reduces myeloid immunosuppression, increases dendritic cell activation, and increases T cell activation (Kauder, 2018); E enhances the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis activity of cetuximab (C) in vitro (Kauder, 2018); and E + pembrolizumab (P) was well-tolerated in the first-in-human trial (Lakhani, 2021). Methods: AGICC-ALX148 21CRC01 (NCT05167409) is a phase 2, single-arm, multicenter, investigator-initiated trial of E (15 mg/kg weekly), C (400 mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2 weekly), and P (200 mg every 3 weeks) in 21-day cycles for patients with unresectable MSS/proficient mismatch repair CRC refractory to oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and a fluoropyrimidine, regardless of tumor sidedness and RAS/BRAF status. Additional key eligibility criteria include ECOG performance status 0-1, evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1, adequate hematologic and end organ function, absence of prior checkpoint inhibitor use, and absence of significant autoimmune disease. Six patients will be enrolled in Stage 1 (safety run-in) and treated with ECP. The study will proceed to Stage 2 (dose expansion, N = 42, and all treated with ECP) if less than 33% of patients in Stage 1 experience a dose-limiting toxicity. Otherwise, additional patients will be enrolled in Stage 1 at lower dose level(s). The co-primary objectives are to determine 1) the recommended dose of E with CP, and 2) objective response rate by RECIST v1.1 (by one-sided exact test with α = 0.05, H0 p ≤ 3% [historical controls], HA p ≥ 15%; power is 87%). The study will close for futility if there are no responses (partial or complete) in the first 24 evaluable patients (by MinMax design with α = 0.025 [1-sided]; power is 87%). Secondary and exploratory aims include determination of progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, response assessment by iRECIST, and blood- and tumor-based immune modulation and baseline tumor expression (PD-L1, EGFR, and CD47) for association with tumor response. The study is open through the Academic GI Cancer Consortium and 5 patients have been enrolled at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT05167409 .

Current Practice in Carcinoid Heart Disease and Burgeoning Opportunities

OPINION STATEMENT

Cardiac surgery with tricuspid valve and potentially pulmonic valve replacement at an experienced center is currently the most effective strategy available for the treatment of carcinoid heart disease. Cardiac surgery for carcinoid heart disease requires a multidisciplinary team including cardiology, medical oncology, cardiothoracic anesthesia, and cardiac surgery. Without cardiac surgery, morbidity and mortality from carcinoid heart disease is high. Aggressive management of carcinoid before and after cardiac surgery is critical. Over time, though, circulating carcinoid hormones can lead to destruction of prosthetic valves as well, resulting in recurrent right heart failure. Percutaneous options for valve repair may be on the horizon for management of carcinoid heart disease.

ATM kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Background

AZD0156 is an oral inhibitor of ATM, a serine threonine kinase that plays a key role in DNA damage response (DDR) associated with double-strand breaks. Topoisomerase-I inhibitor irinotecan is used clinically to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), often in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU). AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5FU was evaluated in preclinical models of CRC to determine whether low doses of AZD0156 enhance the cytotoxicity of irinotecan in chemotherapy regimens used in the clinic.

Methods

Anti-proliferative effects of single-agent AZD0156, the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN38), and combination therapy were evaluated in 12 CRC cell lines. Additional assessment with clonogenic assay, cell cycle analysis, and immunoblotting were performed in 4 selected cell lines. Four colorectal cancer patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD0156, irinotecan, or 5FU alone and in combination for assessment of tumor growth inhibition (TGI). Immunofluorescence was performed on tumor tissues. The DDR mutation profile was compared across in vitro and in vivo models.

Results

Enhanced effects on cellular proliferation and regrowth were observed with the combination of AZD0156 and SN38 in select models. In cell cycle analysis of these models, increased G2/M arrest was observed with combination treatment over either single agent. Immunoblotting results suggest an increase in DDR associated with irinotecan therapy, with a reduced effect noted when combined with AZD0156, which is more pronounced in some models. Increased TGI was observed with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan as compared to single-agent therapy in some PDX models. The DDR mutation profile was variable across models.

Conclusions

AZD0156 and irinotecan provide a rational and active combination in preclinical colorectal cancer models. Variability across in vivo and in vitro results may be related to the variable DDR mutation profiles of the models evaluated. Further understanding of the implications of individual DDR mutation profiles may help better identify patients more likely to benefit from treatment with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan in the clinical setting.

A phase Ib study of the combination of alisertib (Aurora A kinase inhibitor) and MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 Inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors, final expansion cohort data

3112

Background: In prior work, senescence and up-regulation of genes in the PI3K/AKT/mTor pathway were observed in patient-derived xenograft models treated with alisertib to resistance, and tumor growth inhibition was observed when MLN0128 (sapanisertib) was added to alisertib. In a previously reported dose escalation cohort of patients with advanced solid tumors treated with the combination of alisertib and MLN0128, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was alisertib 30mg BID days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle and MLN0128 2mg daily on a continuous schedule. Presented here are final results from the dose expansion portion of this clinical trial. Methods: Three cohorts of patients were treated with the combination at the MTD. Patients with advanced solid tumors, refractory to standard therapy, were assigned to either single-agent treatment with alisertib (Group 1) or MLN0128 (Group 2) on days 1-7 of Cycle 1. For the remainder of the study, patients received combination treatment. Group 3 enrolled patients with refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were treated with standard dosing of the combination. Biopsies were performed in Groups 1 and 2 prior to treatment initiation and after both the single-agent lead-in and 7 days of combination treatment, with assessment of pharmacodynamic markers. Functional imaging was performed pre-treatment and after Cycle 1. Results: A total of 31 patients with refractory cancers were treated. Group 1 included patients with breast (5), colorectal (2), ovarian (2), and pancreatic (1) cancers. Group 2 included patients with breast (4), colorectal (2), pancreatic (2), uterine (1), and kidney (1) cancers. Eleven patients with refractory pancreatic cancer were treated in Group 3. Median time on study was 11.6 weeks in Group 1, 6 weeks in Group 2, and 9 weeks in Group 3. One partial response was documented in Group 1. One patient with pancreatic cancer in Group 1 continued on study for 47 weeks, and another pancreatic cancer patient in Group 3 continued on study for 28 weeks. Toxicity was similar across cohorts, with mucositis, fatigue, hyperglycemia and neutropenia reported as most common. Biopsy results were significant for increased apoptosis and tumor-infiltrating immune cells noted in tissues from 4 patients treated with the MLN0128 lead-in. Decreased F18-FDG uptake on PET/CT, often with increased ADC values in diffusion MRI, was observed in metastatic liver lesions in 4 patients after Cycle 1. Conclusions: In an expansion cohort of 31 patients treated with the combination of MLN0128 and alisertib at the previously defined MTD, treatment was tolerable with an expected toxicity profile. Prolonged stable disease was observed in 2 patients with pancreatic cancer. Increased apoptosis and tumor-infiltrating immune cells were noted in tissues from patients treated with a lead-in of MLN0128. Clinical trial information: NCT02719691.

A phase II study of pembrolizumab, binimetinib, and bevacizumab in patients with microsatellite-stable, refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

118

Background: To date, immune-checkpoint inhibition for microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC has been ineffective, though targeted therapy combination strategies may be promising. This phase II, investigator-initiated trial (NCT03475004) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the three-drug combination of pembrolizumab (pembro), binimetinib, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced, MSS treatment-refractory colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with mCRC locally determined to be MSS and whom have progressed on two prior lines of therapy were enrolled. Treatment consists of pembro (200 mg every 3 weeks), binimetinib (45 mg BID) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is PFS using RECIST v1.1 by investigator review. Additional endpoints include objective response rate, disease control rate at time of first re-staging (2 mo), duration of response, and safety and tolerability. Results: 50 patients have been enrolled (accrual is completed). 53% of patients are male and the mean age is 53.6 (range 31-79). The mean number of prior therapies is 5.3. At the time of preliminary data review, 39 patients are evaluable for response data. The median PFS was 5.8 mo (95% CI 4.2 to 8.9). The objective response rate was 13% with 5 partial responses. 24 patients (62%) had stable disease and 10 (26%) had progressive disease as the best response. The disease control rate at the time of first re-staging was 74%. Median duration of response was 6.5 mo. 19 (40%) patients experienced serious adverse events; the most common grade ≥3 adverse events included transaminase elevation (15%), diarrhea (11%), acneiform rash (9%), hypertension (9%), and anemia (9%). Conclusions: Preliminary results from this phase II study indicate that this regimen of pembrolizumab, binimetinib, and bevacizumab has promising activity and acceptable tolerability in this heavily pre-treated population of patients with MSS metastatic colorectal cancer. Final results will be presented as well as ongoing correlative studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03475004.

Multicenter randomized phase II trial of atezolizumab with or without cobimetinib in biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUNDMEK inhibitors have limited activity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) as monotherapy but are hypothesized to enhance responses to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition.METHODSThis open-label phase II study randomized patients with BTC to atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor). Eligible patients had unresectable BTC with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were randomized and received study therapy. The trial met its primary endpoint, with a median PFS of 3.65 months in the combination arm versus 1.87 months in the monotherapy arm (HR 0.58, 90% CI 0.35-0.93, 1-tail P = 0.027). One patient in the combination arm (3.3%) and 1 patient in the monotherapy arm (2.8%) had a partial response. Combination therapy was associated with more rash, gastrointestinal events, CPK elevations, and thrombocytopenia. Exploratory analysis of tumor biopsies revealed enhanced expression of antigen processing and presentation genes and an increase in CD8/FoxP3 ratios with combination treatment. Patients with higher baseline or lower fold changes in expression of certain inhibitory ligands (LAG3, BTLA, VISTA) on circulating T cells had evidence of greater clinical benefit from the combination.CONCLUSIONThe combination of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib prolonged PFS as compared with atezolizumab monotherapy, but the low response rate in both arms highlights the immune-resistant nature of BTCs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201458.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI) Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; NCI, NIH (R01 CA228414-01 and UM1CA186691); NCI's Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924); NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973); and the Passano Foundation.

Outcome of neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients: comparative, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Use of neoadjuvant therapy for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer has been debatable. With FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) showing tremendous effects in improving the overall survival of patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, there is no definitive consensus regarding the use of this regimen in the elderly.

METHODS

This study evaluated the eligibility of elderly patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer for neoadjuvant therapy. Patients registered in the database of pancreatic cancer at the University of Colorado Cancer Center, who underwent neoadjuvant treatment between January 2011 and March 2019, were separated into three age groups (less than 70, 70-74, 75 or more years) and respective treatment outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The study included 246 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment, of whom 154 and 71 received chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and GnP respectively. Among these 225 patients, 155 were younger than 70 years, 36 were aged 70-74 years, and 34 were aged 75 years or older. Patients under 70 years old received FOLFIRINOX most frequently (124 of 155 versus 18 of 36 aged 70-74 years, and 12 of 34 aged 75 years or more; P < 0.001). Resectability was similar among the three groups (60.0, 58.3, and 55.9 per cent respectively; P = 0.919). Trends towards shorter survival were observed in the elderly (median overall survival time 23.6, 18.0, and 17.6 months for patients aged less than 70, 70-74, and 75 or more years respectively; P = 0.090). After adjusting for co-variables, age was not a significant predictive factor.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of multiagent chemotherapy in patients aged 75 years or over were similar to those in younger patients. Modern multiagent regimens could be a safe and viable treatment option for clinically fit patients aged at least 75 years.

Tissue tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a biomarker of efficacy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic gastrointestinal (mGI) cancers

e14559

Background: While TMB is very dependent on methodology, tissue TMB-H (≥10 mutations/megabase) may predict benefit with ICIs. Pembrolizumab received tissue-agnostic approval for TMB-H unresectable cancers in 2020, but little is known about TMB as a predictive biomarker in mGI cancers. We hypothesized that tissue TMB will correlate with efficacy of ICIs in mGI cancers. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified patients with mGI cancers who received an anti-PD-(L)1 drug and had known TMB at a single academic center from 2012 to 2020. The association of TMB with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Fisher’s exact and Log-rank tests. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to adjust for microsatellite status. Significance was prespecified at 0.05. Results: 83 patients were identified and included. The most common cancer types were colorectal adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 29), esophageal/gastric AC (n = 21) and SCC (n = 4), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 11), anal SCC (n = 7), and pancreas AC (n = 7). Average age was 61, average number of lines of prior systemic therapy for advanced disease was 1.3 (range 0-4), and 37% of patients were treated on a clinical study. All patients received an anti-PD-(L)1 drug; 6%, 2%, and 36% also received ipilimumab, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and other combinations, respectively. Among those with esophageal/gastric cancer, 76% had known PD-L1 CPS (84% ≥1, 63% ≥5, 42% ≥10). TMB was primarily determined by Foundation One CDx (87%). TMB ranged from 0 to 54; n = 22 (27%) were TMB-H (of these, n = 10 were microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)), and n = 61 were TMB-L ( < 10 mutations/megabase; of these, n = 2 were MSI-H). The prevalence of TMB-H and microsatellite stable (MSS) was 14.4%. TMB-L, compared to TMB-H, was associated with inferior ORR (3.5% vs 55.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.045; p < 0.001) and PFS (median 12.7 vs 29.3 weeks; hazard ratio (HR) 2.70; p = 0.001), but not OS (HR 1.20; p = 0.60). In patients with MSS disease, TMB-L, compared to TMB-H, was associated with inferior ORR (OR 0.13; p = 0.04) but not PFS (HR 1.76; p = 0.07) or OS (HR 0.89; p = 0.79). In subgroup analyses, ORR was not significantly associated to tumor type in all or MSS patients. TMB as a continuous variable, in patients with MSS disease, was positively correlated with ORR (p = 0.02) and PFS (p = 0.04), but not OS (p = 0.59). Among all patients, PFS and OS data is immature (median follow-up 13 and 31 weeks). Conclusions: In a single center retrospective study of patients with mGI cancers treated with ICIs, TMB-H was associated with improved ORR and PFS compared to TMB-L. In patients with MSS disease, ORR remained significant. PFS and OS data are immature. TMB as a biomarker of efficacy with ICIs in mGI cancers warrants further study to guide clinical use.

Utility of chemotherapy given before and/or after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases

e16276

Background: Appendiceal adenocarcinoma is relatively rare and often diagnosed incidentally during operations for acute appendicitis. It is commonly associated, either at time of initial presentation or upon recurrence, with peritoneal metastases. A typical treatment strategy for patients with peritoneal disease includes cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Extrapolating largely from literature in colorectal cancer, chemotherapy is frequently given before and/or after CRS/HIPEC though high-level evidence to support this is lacking. We sought to evaluate the effect of systemic chemotherapy on survival. Methods: Utilizing a database of CRS/HIPEC procedures at University of Colorado Hospital from 2008 to present we retrospectively reviewed cases of appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Data collected included staging, histologic grade, chemotherapy given, surgical outcomes, and time to disease recurrence. Patients without adequate information regarding treatment, or without at least 1 year of clinical follow-up, were excluded. Associations between administration of chemotherapy or histologic grade and 1-year DFS were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, and logistic regression was used to assess whether 1-year DFS were different in chemotherapy-treated patients when adjusted for histologic grade. Results: In total, 117 cases reviewed indicated an appendiceal pathology. Of these, 54 cases in a total of 51 patients met the specified criteria for pathology and completeness and length of follow-up information. The average age was 58 years (range 26-81 years). Adenocarcinoma was graded as low in 15 (28%) cases, intermediate in 18 (33%) cases, and high in 21 (39%) cases. 23 (43%) patients received no chemotherapy while 31 (57%) received chemotherapy before and/or after surgery. In the overall population, there was no significant effect of chemotherapy on survival, with 1-year DFS demonstrated in 74.2% of patients receiving some chemotherapy and 70% in patients not receiving chemotherapy (p = 0.765). One-year DFS was achieved in 86% of low-grade cases, 61% of intermediate-grade cases, and 71% of high-grade cases, though this was also not statistically significant (p = 0.254). Furthermore, when 1-year DFS between chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy patients was adjusted for grade, there was again no significant interaction (odds ratio = 0.48, 95% C.I. (0.13-1.64), p = 0.763). Conclusions: In this small, single-institution experience of patients with peritoneal appendiceal adenocarcinoma, there was no significant effect of chemotherapy administration on 1-year DFS. These findings are likely affected by significant confounding with the small sample size and retrospective nature of the data. Further investigation on a larger scale is warranted.

Phase 1 study of OKI-179, an oral class 1-selective depsipeptide HDAC inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: Final results

3075

Background: OKI-179 is a novel, oral pro-drug analog of largazole, a compound in the romidepsin-depsipeptide class of natural products. OKI-006, the active metabolite of OKI-179, inhibits HDAC 1,2,3 (IC50 = 1.2, 2.4, 2.0 nM, respectively), with no significant inhibition of Class IIa HDACs and has shown promising activity in preclinical models of solid tumors. We conducted a first-in-human dose escalation study of OKI-179 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, ECOG ≤1, normal QTc, and disease refractory to or with no available standard therapy options were treated with OKI-179 with either intermittent dosing (once daily for 4 days on 3 days off) or continuous dosing (once daily). Dose escalation was conducted using a standard 3+3 design. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) testing was performed at various time points after dosing. Results: As of Feb 4, 2021, 26 patients (19 female, 7 male) were enrolled with mean age of 63 (range 41-83). Patients received a median of 5 (range 1-11) prior lines of therapy and most common tumor types included pancreatic (N = 5), breast (N = 4), lung (N = 4), and ovarian cancer (N = 4). Twenty patients were treated in intermittent dosing cohorts from 30-450 mg. One DLT (Grade 2 [G2] thrombocytopenia) occurred in the 450 mg cohort which was expanded to 6 patients without subsequent DLTs. Six patients were treated in 2 continuous dosing cohorts of 200 mg and 300 mg. Two of 3 patients in the 300 mg cohort had DLTs of G3-4 thrombocytopenia and no DLTs were observed in 3 patients treated at 200 mg PO daily. The most common adverse events (AEs) were nausea (62%), fatigue (42%), anemia (39%), anorexia (27%), and vomiting (23%). These AE’s were G1-2 except for G3 anemia (12%), G3 fatigue (12%), and G3 anorexia (4%). No other G4-5 treatment-related AEs occurred. Median time on study was 79 days and best response was stable disease (SD) in 10 of 24 patients evaluable for efficacy (42%). Prolonged SD was observed in patients with platinum-resistant serous ovarian cancer (446 days) and adenoid cystic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (256 days). OKI-006 achieved consistent exposure with Cmax > 2,000 ng/ml and AUC > 8,000 hr*ng/ml, well above the targeted exposure for efficacy based on pre-clinical studies in murine models. Tmax was 2 hours and T1/2 was 6-8 hours. OKI-179 treatment resulted in > 3X increased T cell histone H3K9 and H3K27 acetylation within circulating PBMCs at doses of 180 - 450 mg. Conclusions: OKI-179 has a manageable safety profile, with thrombocytopenia being the on-target DLT. It has a favorable PK profile and demonstrated on-target PD effects at tolerable doses. The MTD and RP2D for OKI-179 was 450 mg daily for intermittent dosing and 200 mg daily for continuous dosing. Phase 2 studies are being designed, with a focus on combination with endocrine therapy in ER+ breast cancer and in NRAS-mutant melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03931681.

WEE1 Inhibition in Combination With Targeted Agents and Standard Chemotherapy in Preclinical Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer with high incidences of p53 mutations. AZD1775 (adavosertib, previously MK-1775) is a small molecule WEE1 inhibitor that abrogates the G2M checkpoint and can potentially synergize with DNA damaging therapies commonly used in PDAC treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify combination partners for AZD1775, including standard chemotherapy or targeted agents, in PDAC preclinical models. Low powered preliminary screens demonstrated that two of the four PDX models responded better to the combinations of AZD1775 with irinotecan or capecitabine than to either single agent. Following the screens, two full powered PDAC PDX models of differing p53 status were tested with the combinations of AZD1775 and irinotecan or capecitabine. The combinations of AZD1775 and SN38 or 5-FU were also tested on PDAC cell lines. Cellular proliferation was measured using an IncuCyte Live Cell Imager and apoptosis was measured using a Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay. Flow cytometry was conducted to measure alterations in cell cycle distribution. Western blot analysis was used to determine the effects of the drug combinations on downstream effectors. In PDX models with mutated p53 status, there was significant tumor growth inhibition from the combination of AZD1775 with irinotecan or capecitabine (P ≤ 0.03), while PDX models with wild type p53 did not show anti-tumor synergy from the same combinations (P ≥ 0.08). The combination of AZD1775 with SN38 or 5-FU significantly decreased proliferation in all PDAC cell lines, and enhanced apoptosis in multiple cell lines. Cell cycle distribution was disrupted from the combination of AZD1775 with SN38 or 5-FU which was recorded as G2M arrest and decreased G1 phase. AZD1775 inhibited phospho-CDC2 and increased the expression of γH2AX that was either maintained or enhanced after combination with SN38 or 5-FU. The combination of AZD1775 with irinotecan/SN38 or capecitabine/5-FU showed anti-tumor effects in vivo and in vitro in PDAC models. These results support further investigation for these combination strategies to enhance outcomes for PDAC patients.

Impact of Radiation Dose on Postoperative Complications in Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers

Introduction: The impact of radiation prescription dose on postoperative complications during standard of care trimodality therapy for operable stage II-III esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers has not been established. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancers treated between 2004 and 2016 with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection at a single institution. Post-operative complications within 30 days were reviewed and scored using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Results were compared between patients treated with <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy, as well as to published CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation group data (41.4 Gy). Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated with <50 Gy (range 39.6-46.8 Gy) and 53 patients were treated with ≥ 50 Gy (range 50.0-52.5 Gy) delivered using IMRT/VMAT (41%), 3D-CRT (46%), or tomotherapy IMRT (12%). Complication rates and CCI scores between our <50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy groups were not significantly different. Assuming a normal distribution of the CROSS data, there was no significant difference in CCI scores between the CROSS study neoadjuvant chemoradiation, <50 Gy, or ≥ 50 Gy groups. Rates of pulmonary complications were greater in the CROSS group (50%) than our <50 Gy (38%) or ≥ 50 Gy (30%) groups. Conclusions: In selected esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer patients, radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy do not appear to increase 30 day post-operative complication rates. These findings suggest that the use of definitive doses of radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy) in the neoadjuvant setting may not increase post-operative complications.

Silmitasertib (CX-4945) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A phase Ib/II study

312

Background: Silmitasertib (CX-4945), an oral small molecule inhibitor of casein kinase 2 (CK2), has exhibited preclinical antitumor activity and strong synergism with gemcitabine + cisplatin. We investigated the safety and efficacy of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: S4-13-001 is a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II study of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. The phase Ib portion included dose-escalation, expansion, and exploratory cohorts of silmitasertib with doses ranging from 200 to 1000 mg bid (6 days for the escalation/expansion cohorts and 10 and 21 days’ continuous dosing for the exploratory cohorts). In the phase II portion patients received silmitasertib 1000 mg bid for 10 days in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin on days 1 & 8 over a 21-day cycle. In this interim analysis, we present findings from the combined population of patients from the phase Ib and II portions of the study. Response to treatment was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02128282). Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled and received silmitasertib in the phase Ib (n=50) and phase II (n=37) portions of the study. Of these, 55 patients were evaluable for efficacy with details as follows: median PFS 11.1 (95% CI 7.6–14.7) months; median overall survival (OS) 17.4 (95% CI 13.4–25.7) months; overall response rate (ORR) 32.1%; and disease control rate (DCR) 79.3%. Almost all patients (79/87; 90.8%) evaluable for safety reported ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (all grades) with silmitasertib were diarrhea (65.5%), nausea (50.6%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), and anemia (21.8%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were diarrhea (13.8%), neutropenia (11.5%), nausea (9.2%), anemia (8.0%), and thrombocytopenia (8.0%). Eleven patients (12.6%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Conclusions: Silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin yields promising preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. Based on these data a randomized phase III trial is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02128282.

A single-institution experience using total neoadjuvant therapy to treat locally advanced rectal cancer

64

Background: The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has historically included preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery and then adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently there has been an increasing utilization of preoperative chemotherapy in addition to standard chemoradiation, a strategy known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TNT has been offered to patients at the University of Colorado Cancer Center since 2015. Methods: Records of all patients presenting to the University of Colorado colorectal multidisciplinary clinic since 2015 were screened for treatment with TNT. Data collected on these patients included demographic information, diagnosis and initial staging, preoperative treatment received, and surgical outcomes including treatment response and pathological stage. TNT included preoperative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin combined with either 5-FU (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (CAPOX) as well as chemoradiation, generally given with concurrent capecitabine. Patients then underwent surgical resection; if a complete clinical response was achieved with TNT, non-operative management (NOM) was offered. Results: A total of 81 patients thus far have undergone TNT followed by resection or, if complete clinical response and preferred by the patient, NOM. The mean age of patients was 56 years, ranging from 23 to 87, and 60% of patients were male. The majority of patients (67) had stage III disease at presentation while 1 had stage 1 (T2N0) disease, 11 had stage II disease and 2 patients had oligometastatic disease. Ultimately 13 patients (16%) opted for non-operative management after being found to have a complete clinical response following TNT. Of the 68 patients who underwent surgical resection, 21 (31%) had a pathological complete response, with another 14 (21%) with near-complete response. 28 patients (41%) had a partial treatment response and 5 (7%) had no treatment response. In total, the rate of complete clinical or pathologic response was 42%. Treatment was overall well-tolerated with 90% of patients receiving the full planned dose of radiation and 98% of patients completing all planned cycles of chemotherapy, though most of them with typical dose reductions needed. Of the patients who underwent surgery, 49 (72%) had low anterior resection and 19 (28%) had an abdominoperineal resection. Of patients with temporary ileostomies, 85% of them had their ileostomy reversed within 10 weeks of surgery. Conclusions: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer by a total neoadjuvant approach is well-tolerated and results in a high rate of clinical and pathological complete response.

Preclinical and Dose-Finding Phase I Trial Results of Combined Treatment with a TORC1/2 Inhibitor (TAK-228) and Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor (Alisertib) in Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rational combination of TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 and Aurora A kinase inhibitor alisertib in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to conduct a phase I dose escalation trial in patients with advanced solid tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

TNBC cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with alisertib, TAK-228, or the combination and evaluated for changes in proliferation, cell cycle, mTOR pathway modulation, and terminal cellular fate, including apoptosis and senescence. A phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with escalating doses of alisertib and TAK-228 using a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

RESULTS

The combination of TAK-228 and alisertib resulted in decreased proliferation and cell-cycle arrest in TNBC cell lines. Treatment of TNBC PDX models resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and increased apoptosis with the combination. In the phase I dose escalation study, 18 patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled. The MTD was alisertib 30 mg b.i.d. days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle and TAK-228 2 mg daily, continuous dosing. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, rash, mucositis, and alopecia.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of TAK-228 to alisertib potentiates the antitumor activity of alisertib in vivo, resulting in increased cell death and apoptosis. The combination is tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors and should be evaluated further in expansion cohorts with additional pharmacodynamic assessment.

Abstract 6387: Therapeutic targeting of lipid oxidation and apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths with more than 56,000 new cases estimated to be diagnosed in 2019. Current treatment options for PDAC include radiation and chemotherapeutic regimens, however these targeted therapies are ineffective for patients with advanced disease progression. Additionally, the dense stromal nature of PDAC tumors create challenges to target the cancer cells resulting in incomplete cell killing and eventual drug resistance. Recent evidence has shown that CPT1A, an enzyme that regulates the entry of lipids into mitochondria for β-oxidation, is strongly expressed in several cancers. CPT1A is located on the mitochondrial membrane and potentially interacts with BCL-2, an anti-apoptotic protein that promotes tumor maintenance and metastasis. Metabolic stress can activate the anti-apoptotic effects of BCL-2, reprograming metabolism to use fat oxidation for cancer survival. Therefore, a co-inhibition using the selective BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, with agents that inhibit CPT1A and β-oxidation, could be a novel strategy for PDAC. There are few studies considering CPT1A as a therapeutic target for PDAC. Current available drugs to target these pathways include the anti-anginal ranolazine, and CPT1A inhibitors etomoxir and perhexiline. Previous studies have shown that expression of BCL-2 by tumor cells is necessary for BCL-2 inhibitors to be effective. We initially wanted to determine the expression of BCL-2 and CPT1A in PDAC cells utilizing western blot and rtPCR, and to confirm their proximity using a proximity ligation assay (PLA). PDAC cells were then plated in 96 well plates and Cell Titer-Glo assays were performed to determine effective concentrations of single agent venetoclax, etomoxir, and perhexiline. The effects of these drugs in combination were then evaluated using a clonogenic assay, which was analyzed using the ImageJ colony area plugin. PDAC cells were then exposed to the combinations and western blots were performed to evaluate changes downstream effectors. We have confirmed the expression of BCL-2 and CPT1A on the mitochondrial membrane using Westerns, rtPCR, and a PLA on several PDAC lines. Though single agent drugs had little effect on cell viability, the combination of venetoclax with CPT1A and β-oxidation inhibitors decreased colony formation in some PDAC cell lines. Western blot analysis revealed the drug combinations affected the phosphorylation of AKT and 4E-BP1 and expression of the pro-apoptotic protein BID. These data suggest that co-targeting BCL-2 and CPT1A have potential for anti-tumor effects in PDAC. Additional research into the role of CPT1A in PDAC biology will elucidate the optimal dosing concentrations and mechanisms for further studies.

Citation Format: Sarah J. Hartman, Nathalie Nadales, Stacey M. Bagby, Betelehem W. Yacob, Brian L. Gittleman, Adriana Estrada-Bernal, Anh T. Le, Christopher H. Lieu, S. Lindsey Davis, Alexis D. Leal, Jennifer R. Diamond, Wells A. Messersmith, Isabel R. Schlaepfer, Todd M. Pitts. Therapeutic targeting of lipid oxidation and apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6387.

Abstract 6647: Sensitizing microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to immune checkpoint therapy utilizing Wnt pathway inhibition

Immunotherapies that target immune regulatory checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 are widely used among many cancer types and have shown positive results in CRC with high microsatellite instability. However, in microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC there is a dismal response rate of 0%. The limited efficacy has shown to be partially due to the lack of T-cells in the tumor microenvironment and/or no activation/regulation of paramount cells in the immune system. The Wnt pathway is the most commonly altered pathway in CRC and is highly involved in driving tumor initiation and progression. Recent evidence also demonstrates the Wnt pathway is involved in T-lymphocyte development, maturation/activation of CD8+ effector T cells and recruitment of dendritic cells. Therefore, targeting the Wnt pathway utilizing a Porcupine (PORCN) inhibitor (ETC-159) in MSS CRC may be a promising strategy to sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibition.

Human Immune System BRGS (BALB/c, Rag2−/−, IL2RγC−/−, NODSIRPα) mice were engrafted with MSS CRC PDX (hPDX). The hPDX were randomized according to human chimerism into the following drug treatments groups: Vehicle, ETC-159, nivolumab, and the combination. Treatments began when tumors reached 100-300mm3 and tumors were measured twice weekly. At the end of study, sera, lymph nodes, spleen, and tumor tissue were collected for immunohistochemistry, single cell suspensions, and flow cytometry analysis.

Combination therapy resulted in a significant decrease in tumor volume compared to both single agents and vehicle. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated an increase in human immune cells, in particular human CD4 and CD8 cells in the combination compared to the vehicle and nivolumab treated groups. Additionally, these T-cells showed increased signs of activation and effector function, as indicated by increased CD69+ expression, effector memory subsets, and granzyme B+ cells in the TILs, with a further reduction in Treg populations, suggesting an overall increase in inflammation. An increase in MHC II expression on tumor cells was observed in the ETC-159 single agent with a statistically significant increase in the combination treated tumors demonstrating enhanced antigen presentation. Furthermore, PD-1 expression was upregulated on CD4+ T-cells in the ETC-159 single agent. Lastly, VECTRA analysis corroborates the flow cytometry data showing a changing tumor immune landscape through an increase in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the tumor and surrounding stroma.

Our data demonstrates the combination treatment of ETC-159 + nivolumab in MSS CRC hPDX show increased tumor infiltration of human immune cells. Further preclinical data is compulsory but these results support further development of this combination in clinical trials.

Citation Format: Stacey M. Bagby, Sarah J. Hartman, Natalie M. Navarro, Betelehem W. Yacob, Jeremy Shulman, Jessica Barkow, Christopher H. Lieu, S. Lindsey Davis, Alexis D. Leal, Wells A. Messersmith, Angela Minic, Kimberly R. Jordan, Julie Lang, Todd M. Pitts. Sensitizing microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to immune checkpoint therapy utilizing Wnt pathway inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6647.

A phase 1b dose escalation study of Wnt pathway inhibitor vantictumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer

Vantictumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits Wnt pathway signaling through binding FZD1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 receptors. This phase Ib study evaluated vantictumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients received vantictumab at escalating doses in combination with standard dosing of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine according to a 3 + 3 design. A total of 31 patients were treated in 5 dosing cohorts. Fragility fractures attributed to vantictumab occurred in 2 patients in Cohort 2 (7 mg/kg every 2 weeks), and this maximum administered dose (MAD) on study was considered unsafe. The dosing schedule was revised to every 4 weeks for Cohorts 3 through 5, with additional bone safety parameters added. Sequential dosing of vantictumab followed by nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was also explored. No fragility fractures attributed to vantictumab occurred in these cohorts; pathologic fracture not attributed to vantictumab was documented in 2 patients. The study was ultimately terminated due to concerns around bone-related safety, and thus the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was not determined. The MAD of vantictumab according to the revised dosing schedule was 5 mg/kg (n = 16).

An assessment of dose intensity of the TNT approach on outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer

258

Background: Patients with clinical stage II or III locally advanced rectal cancer may be treated with the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach; chemotherapy with 4 mths of FOLFOX followed by chemoradiation (chemo/XRT) with capecitabine for 5 wks administered before surgery. We hypothesized that full dose intensity is not necessary for treatment benefit. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer recommended to receive TNT by the multidisciplinary (multiD) colorectal cancer tumor board at the University of Colorado Cancer Center (UCCC). The primary objective was to evaluate dose intensity of TNT and its impact on response assessed by biopsy and/or imaging (MRI). Results: Between January 31, 2016 and January 31, 2019, 80 patients were recommended the TNT approach for cancer management by the multiD team. Of those, 48 completed their neoadjuvant treatment at UCCC and were included in the analysis. The average age was 55 years (range 23-80) and 61% were male. Thirty-one patients had an ECOG of 0 and 17 had an ECOG of 1. Overall responses were 44% complete response (CR, n = 21), 15% near complete response (nCR, n = 7), 35% partial response (PR, n = 17), and 6% no response (NR, n = 3). See Table for responses seen by dose intensity for chemotherapy. Two patients did not receive their full planned XRT course, and 9 patients had their capecitabine doses held/decreased during chemoradiation. Conclusions: This single center retrospective analysis of patients receiving the TNT approach for rectal cancer provides data supporting that achieving full dose intensity is not necessary to achieve treatment benefit.

[Table: see text]

Association of Cancer Immunotherapy With Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy and Diffuse Retinal Venulitis

Importance

Checkpoint inhibition in cancer immunotherapy related to T-cell-driven mechanisms of action associated with acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) and diffuse retinal venulitis, an adverse event not previously described, is reported here.

Objective

To describe 2 patients who developed ophthalmologic events after treatment with the programmed death 1 axis inhibitor, atezolizumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective review of 2 patients treated with atezolizumab for metastatic breast cancer and colon cancer, respectively, who presented with AMN and diffuse retinal venulitis conducted at 2 tertiary medical centers.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multimodal imaging including near infrared, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein angiography were used to characterize retinal vascular abnormalities.

Results

Based on optical coherence tomography and multimodal imaging findings, the clinical diagnosis of AMN associated with diffuse retinal venulitis was made in these 2 patients receiving atezolizumab.

Conclusions and Relevance

While only 2 cases of patients receiving the programmed death ligand 1 inhibitor atezolizumab who experienced AMN and diffuse retinal venulitis are described here, these findings suggest that patients receiving programmed death 1 axis inhibitor therapies may need to be monitored for unexpected immune-related ocular toxicity including abnormalities of the microvasculature and large retinal vessels. Further studies might investigate the potential mechanisms of retinal vascular changes associated with these therapies.

Multicenter Study of the Real-World Use of Ceftaroline versus Vancomycin for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

The objective of this study was to determine if real-world ceftaroline treatment in adults hospitalized for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) is associated with decreased infection-related length of stay (LOSinf) compared to that with vancomycin. This was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study from 2012 to 2017. Cox proportional hazard regression, propensity score matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to determine the independent effect of treatment group on LOSinf The patients were adults hospitalized with ABSSSI and treated with ceftaroline or vancomycin for ≥72 h within 120 h of diagnosis at four academic medical centers and two community hospitals in Arizona, Florida, Michigan, and West Virginia. A total of 724 patients were included (325 ceftaroline treated and 399 vancomycin treated). In general, ceftaroline-treated patients had characteristics consistent with a higher risk of poor outcomes. The unadjusted median LOSinf values were 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 7) days and 6 (IQR, 4 to 8) days in the vancomycin and ceftaroline groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.866; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.747 to 1.002). The Cox proportional hazard model (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.891; 95% CI, 0.748 to 1.060), propensity score-matched (aHR, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.786 to 1.159), and IPTW (aHR, 0.918; 95% CI, 0.793 to 1.063) analyses demonstrated no significant difference in LOSinf between groups. Patients treated with ceftaroline were significantly more likely to meet criteria for discharge readiness at day 3 in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Although discharge readiness at day 3 was higher in ceftaroline-treated patients, LOSinf values were similar between treatment groups. Clinical and nonclinical factors were associated with LOSinf.

Treatment delays during FOLFOX chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Background

FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) is the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of colorectal cancer. FOLFOX is administered in 14-day cycles, though toxicities frequently lead to unplanned delays. We report the incidence of unplanned delays among patients receiving FOLFOX and describe the reasons for delays.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Patients were treated at one of two tertiary cancer centers between January 2012 and April 2016. Cycles 2-6 were assessed for delays, and treatments were considered delayed when the interval from prior treatment was >18 days. Reasons for unplanned delays were categorized based on review of clinical records.

Results

We identified 214 patients receiving FOLFOX as standard-of-care therapy. The median age was 59 years, and 55% were female. Of 961 evaluable treatment cycles, 124 (13%) had unplanned delays, and 92 of 214 patients (43%) had one or more unplanned delays in cycles 2-6. Cytopenias (neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia) were the most common cause of unplanned delays, affecting 34% of patients and accounting for 74 of 124 unplanned delays (60%).

Conclusions

Delays are common during FOLFOX chemotherapy, with 43% of patients having at least one unplanned delay prior to completing cycle 6. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the leading causes of unplanned delays. Our findings justify the development of systematic approaches for preventing unplanned delays, such as standardized laboratory treatment criteria and/or proactive dose adjustment strategies.

Abstract 4720: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Background: AZD0156 is an oral inhibitor of ATM, a serine threonine kinase that plays a key role in DNA damage response associated with DNA double strand breaks. Topoisomerase-I inhibitors like irinotecan induce single-strand DNA breaks, which are converted to double-strand breaks during DNA replication. Thus the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan is a rational combination for clinical use. Irinotecan is used clinically to treat a variety of malignancies, including colorectal cancer (CRC), usually in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as FOLFIRI. An ongoing phase 1 clinical trial is evaluating AZD0156 in combination with single-agent irinotecan and FOLFIRI in patients with refractory cancers (NCT02588105). The purpose of this study is to evaluate AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5FU in preclinical models of CRC to help inform clinical use.

Methods: Anti-proliferative effects of single-agent AZD0156 and combination therapy with SN38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) and 5FU were evaluated in CRC cell lines using the Cell-Titer Glo assay. Immunoblotting and cell cycle analysis were performed to determine the mechanism of enhanced combination effects. Four CRC patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD0156, irinotecan, and 5FU alone and in combination for assessment of tumor growth inhibition (TGI).

Results: An enhanced antiproliferative effect was observed with the combination treatment over either single agent. A more significant synergistic effect was demonstrated with the combination of AZD0156 and SN38 as compared with the combination of AZD0156 and 5FU. Cell cycle data demonstrated enhanced cell cycle arrest with combination therapy as compared to single agents. Immunoblotting results suggest a decrease in phosphorylated gamma-H2AX in cell lines treated with combination therapies. Increased TGI was observed in CRC PDX models treated with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan as compared to single-agent therapy in 3 of 4 models. There was not a significant change in TGI with the addition of 5FU for triplet therapy in the majority of models.

Conclusions: The combination of AZD0156 with irinotecan is synergistic in in vitro models and is associated with increased TGI in CRC PDX in vivo models. The addition of 5FU to AZD0156 and irinotecan did not result in increased TGI as compared to doublet therapy in CRC PDX models, though did not decrease the AZD0156/irinotecan combination effect. An ongoing clinical trial is evaluating this combination in patients with cancers refractory to standard treatments (NCT02588105).

Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Marina I. Schlaepfer, Stacey M. Bagby, Sarah J. Hartman, Betelehem W. Yacob, Tonia Tse, Dennis M. Simmons, Jennifer R. Diamond, Christopher H. Lieu, Alexis D. Leal, Elaine B. Cadogan, Gareth D. Hughes, Stephen T. Durant, Wells A. Messersmith, Todd M. Pitts. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in preclinical models of colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4720.

Abstract 1315: Combination of Wee1 inhibition with targeted and standard chemotherapy in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death and has a 5-year survival rate of less than 7%. The poor prognosis associated with PDA is related in part to a lack of screening tests to promote early detection and ineffective systemic targeted therapies. Adavosertib (AZD1775, MK1775) is a selective Wee1 inhibitor with promising preclinical activity in PDA and synergy with cytotoxic chemotherapy in other cancer types. Wee1 is a tyrosine kinase that activates in the G2M cell cycle checkpoint in response to DNA damage. Inhibition of Wee1 with adavosertib prevents the phosphorylation of CDC2, thus allowing unrepaired DNA to enter mitosis and ultimately succumb to mitotic catastrophe. The purpose of this study was to investigate adavosertib in combination with standard chemotherapy and other targeted agents in preclinical models of PDA.

Methods: Athymic nude mice were implanted with PDA PDX models on the right and left flanks. When the average tumor volume reached 100-300 mm3, mice were randomized into one of the following treatments: vehicle, adavosertib, irinotecan, navitoclax, capecitabine, adavosertib + irinotecan, or adavosertib + navitoclax, adavosertib + capecitabine. Tumor volume was calculated using the following equation: volume = (length × width) × 0.52. Four pancreatic cancer cell lines were plated in 96-well plates and Cell Titer-Glo proliferation assays were performed to determine the most effective combination doses of irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax with adavosertib in vitro. Combination effects were analyzed using CalcuSyn software. The most effective doses within each cell line were selected and used for Caspase 3/7 apoptosis assays and cell cycle analyses by flow cytometry. Western blots were performed to evaluate changes in downstream effectors.

Results: In vivo, the combination of adavosertib with either irinotecan or navitoclax resulted in decreased tumor growth compared to the respective single agents. The combination of adavosertib with irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax in vitro resulted in greater antiproliferative effects in all cell lines, and the several combinations were synergistic in all cell lines as determined by CI values less than 1. Navitoclax increased apoptosis in several cell lines both as a single agent and was enhanced in combination with adavosertib. Irinotecan proved to be more cell cycle dependent and significantly altered the cell cycle in all cell lines. Irinotecan increased phospho-CDC2 and decreased PHH3, while adavosertib increased gamma-H2AX as a single agent and in combination.

Conclusions: The combination of adavosertib with either irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax in vivo decreased tumor growth and had enhanced antiproliferative effects in vitro. These data support future studies with adavosertib in combination with standard therapies or navitoclax to treat PDA.

Citation Format: Sarah J. Hartman, Stacey M. Bagby, Betelehem W. Yacob, Dennis M. Simmons, Tonia E. Tse, Christopher H. Lieu, S. Lindsey Davis, Alexis D. Leal, Jennifer R. Diamond, Wells A. Messersmith, Todd M. Pitts. Combination of Wee1 inhibition with targeted and standard chemotherapy in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1315.

Phase I Study of the Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) Inhibitor Navoximod (GDC-0919) Administered with PD-L1 Inhibitor (Atezolizumab) in Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

IDO1 induces immune suppression in T cells through l-tryptophan (Trp) depletion and kynurenine (Kyn) accumulation in the local tumor microenvironment, suppressing effector T cells and hyperactivating regulatory T cells (Treg). Navoximod is an investigational small-molecule inhibitor of IDO1. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of navoximod in combination with atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study consisted of a 3+3 dose-escalation stage (n = 66) and a tumor-specific expansion stage (n = 92). Navoximod was given orally every 12 hours continuously for 21 consecutive days of each cycle with the exception of cycle 1, where navoximod administration started on day -1 to characterize pharmacokinetics. Atezolizumab was administered by intravenous infusion 1,200 mg every 3 weeks on day 1 of each cycle.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 157) received navoximod at 6 dose levels (50-1,000 mg) in combination with atezolizumab. The maximum administered dose was 1,000 mg twice daily; the MTD was not reached. Navoximod demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile, and plasma Kyn generally decreased with increasing doses of navoximod. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (22%), rash (22%), and chromaturia (20%). Activity was observed at all dose levels in various tumor types (melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, ovarian, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, cervical, neural sheath, non-small cell lung cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial bladder cancer): 6 (9%) dose-escalation patients achieved partial response, and 10 (11%) expansion patients achieved partial response or complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of navoximod and atezolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics for patients with advanced cancer. Although activity was observed, there was no clear evidence of benefit from adding navoximod to atezolizumab.

High incidence of advanced stage cancer and prolonged rectal bleeding history before diagnosis in young-onset patients with colorectal cancer

3576

Background: In contrast to the older population, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in younger patients (aged < 50 years) has been increasing in the last three decades. Younger patients tend to present with more advanced disease, thought to be in part related to lack of routine screening colonoscopies. The goal of this study was to examine characteristics of young-onset CRC and potentially identify factors that may aid in earlier diagnosis and treatment. Methods: We collected data for patients available through the University of Colorado Cancer Center Cancer Registry. Inclusion criteria included: 1) Diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer between the years 2012-2018 and 2) age at diagnosis of less than 50 years. Pertinent data including baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, family history, pathology, molecular testing, staging, and treatment were collected. Results: 211 patients with young-onset CRC were available for review. Mean age at diagnosis was 42.4 years and 55.5% were males. A total of 42.1% had rectal cancer and a majority of the colon cancer diagnoses had left-sided tumors (66%). Regarding clinical presentation, 52.2% presented with rectal bleeding prior to diagnosis. Of those who presented with rectal bleeding, the average time from the onset of bleeding to diagnosis was 271.17 days. 42.9% of young-onset CRC were stage IV at the time of initial diagnosis. Evaluation of the pathology specimens showed that 89.6% were adenocarcinomas and 63.5% were grade 2 or higher. At diagnosis, the mean BMI was 26.6 and the mean CEA was 135.5. A total of 72.5% of young-onset patients had a positive family history of any cancer. KRAS or NRAS mutations were present in 49.6% of patients, BRAF V600E mutations were present in 3.8%, and 10.8% were MSI-H. Conclusions: Prolonged rectal bleeding history prior to diagnosis was noted in a significant proportion of young-onset patients with colorectal cancer. Patients and primary care physicians should be made aware of this finding in order to facilitate timely referral for colonoscopy which may lead to earlier diagnosis, less advanced disease at diagnosis, and improved outcomes.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled in phase I clinical trials: Clinical outcomes and cohort trends

1099

Background: Phase I clinical trials have traditionally enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors and many providers perceive the likelihood of clinical benefit as low. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled on Phase I clinical trials and explore differences in outcomes for patients enrolled in all-comer versus breast cancer-specific cohorts. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with metastatic breast cancer enrolled in Phase I clinical trials at the University of Colorado Cancer Center from 2012-2018. We included trials with Phase I and/or Phase Ib in the title. Studies or cohorts enrolling patients with ≥ 3 tumor types were considered all-comer and those with enrollment restricted to breast cancer or a breast cancer subtype were considered breast cancer-specific. Results: A total of 208 patients were enrolled in Phase I clinical trials, 168 in breast cancer-specific cohorts and 40 in all-comer trials. Patients on average were 56.9 years old (range 31-79), 98.6% (205/208) female, 1.4% (3/208) male, 57.2% ER+/Her2-, 30.1% ER-/Her2- and 11.1% Her2+. Patients received on average 2.1(range 0-10) prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Patients enrolled on Phase I clinical trials remained on study without progression on average for 138 days (CI 95%, 112.64 to 163.91). Patients enrolled on breast cancer-specific studies remained on study for 152 days (CI 95%, 120.66 to 182.56) compared to 82 days (CI 95%, 59.43 to 105.13) for those enrolled on all-comer trials, p< 0.05. Patients went off study for disease progression (83.17%), adverse events (7.69%), and other (9.14%), including withdrawal of consent. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with multiple lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting enrolled in Phase I clinical trials received clinical benefit from treatment that is favorable compared to historical controls of late-line chemotherapy. The majority of patients were treated on breast cancer-specific cohorts consistent with trends in Phase I trial design including more tumor specific cohorts.

Biomarkers to predict immune-related adverse events with checkpoint inhibitors

131

Background: Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) occur commonly with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for the treatment of cancer, although the specific event and severity can vary widely. Little is known regarding factors that may predict which patients will develop an IRAE. The goal of this study is to identify blood biomarkers predictive of IRAE associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Methods: Blood samples collected from patients with melanoma prior to receiving therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors were obtained from the University of Colorado Skin Cancer Biorepository. Testing for a panel of autoantibodies and cytokines (ANA, CCP 3.1, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IP-10, MCP-1, TNF alpha, IFN alpha 2, IFN gamma) in serum samples from patients who had at least one documented IRAE was performed by Exsera BioLabs. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate biomarker levels in relation to type, grade, and number of adverse events. Results: Pre-treatment samples from 45 patients were evaluated. Median age was 55; 26 were male and 19 were female. The most common IRAEs were colitis (n = 22), thyroid dysfunction (n = 21), and dermatitis (n = 20). Most IRAEs were grade 2 in severity, and the majority of patients (n = 36) experienced more than 1 IRAE. TNF alpha was elevated in 60% of patient samples, while IFN alpha 2 was elevated in 44%. Borderline ANA was detected in 27% of samples and ANA was positive in 11%. No samples had elevation of IL-2. Between 9% and 18% of samples had elevation of the other immune markers tested (IFN gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and CCP 3.1). Elevation of TNF alpha and IFN alpha 2 were associated with higher grades of IRAEs. No associations between immune markers and the number or type of adverse events in an individual patient were noted. Results from 15 patients who did not have a documented IRAE on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy are currently pending to confirm these findings are unique to patients developing IRAE. Conclusions: This preliminary data suggests that baseline elevations of TNF alpha and IFN alpha 2 may predict development of IRAEs with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Results from samples from patients who did not develop an IRAE on therapy will be reported at the meeting.

QIM19-130: Quality Improvement Project to Standardize a Prehabilitation Pathway for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Background: At our institution, the standard treatment recommendation for esophageal cancer patients with stage IB–IIIB disease is for neoadjuvant chemoradiation per the CROSS regimen prior to surgery. This regimen can be difficult for patients to tolerate, and they may be unable to receive full dose therapy without treatment dose reductions and delays. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement (QI) project, STRENGTH (Seeking to Reactivate Esophageal and Gastric Treatment Health), to implement supportive care interventions in the prehabilitation phase of neoadjuvant treatment. Our QI program included a standardized chemotherapy order template with supportive care interventions implemented at specific time points. Following implementation of the STRENGTH pathway, a retrospective QI analysis assessed an equal number of patients in the pre-STRENGTH and STRENGTH group for chemotherapy and radiation therapy dose intensities, as well as treatment outcomes. Results: During the pre-STRENGTH period, patients received an average of 5 chemotherapy treatments (range, 2–6), with an average relative dose intensity of 91.8% for carboplatin and 86.7% for paclitaxel. During the STRENGTH period, patients received an average of 6 (range, 5–8) chemotherapy treatments, with an average relative dose intensity of 111.4% for carboplatin and 112.9% for paclitaxel. In the pre-STRENGTH group, one patient did not complete their planned radiation dose due to nausea, vomiting, and dehydration. All patients in the STRENGTH group received their planned radiation dose. In the STRENGTH group, there is a trend of improved pathologic response, longer progression-free survival, and shortened time to surgery. Conclusion: Implementation of the STRENGTH pathway improved chemotherapy dose intensity, with potentially improved oncologic outcomes in the STRENGTH group. We plan to further optimize the STRENGTH program with implementation of standardized dose reduction and delay protocols for both chemotherapy and radiation, and assess the effects of STRENGTH interventions on patient quality of life.

Characterization of immune responses to anti-PD-1 mono and combination immunotherapy in hematopoietic humanized mice implanted with tumor xenografts

Background

The success of agents that reverse T-cell inhibitory signals, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies, has reinvigorated cancer immunotherapy research. However, since only a minority of patients respond to single-agent therapies, methods to test the potential anti-tumor activity of rational combination therapies are still needed. Conventional murine xenograft models have been hampered by their immune-compromised status; thus, we developed a hematopoietic humanized mouse model, hu-CB-BRGS, and used it to study anti-tumor human immune responses to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line and patient-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) xenografts (PDX).

Methods

BALB/c-Rag2^nullIl2rγ^nullSIRPα^NOD (BRGS) pups were humanized through transplantation of cord blood (CB)-derived CD34+ cells. Mice were evaluated for human chimerism in the blood and assigned into experimental untreated or nivolumab groups based on chimerism. TNBC cell lines or tumor tissue from established CRC PDX models were implanted into both flanks of humanized mice and treatments ensued once tumors reached a volume of ~150mm³. Tumors were measured twice weekly. At end of study, immune organs and tumors were collected for immunological assessment.

Results

Humanized PDX models were successfully established with a high frequency of tumor engraftment. Humanized mice treated with anti-PD-1 exhibited increased anti-tumor human T-cell responses coupled with decreased Treg and myeloid populations that correlated with tumor growth inhibition. Combination therapies with anti-PD-1 treatment in TNBC-bearing mice reduced tumor growth in multi-drug cohorts. Finally, as observed in human colorectal patients, anti-PD-1 therapy had a strong response to a microsatellite-high CRC PDX that correlated with a higher number of human CD8+ IFNγ+ T cells in the tumor.

Conclusion

Hu-CB-BRGS mice represent an in vivo model to study immune checkpoint blockade to human tumors. The human immune system in the mice is inherently suppressed, similar to a tumor microenvironment, and thus allows growth of human tumors. However, the suppression can be released by anti-PD-1 therapies and inhibit tumor growth of some tumors. The model offers ample access to lymph and tumor cells for in-depth immunological analysis. The tumor growth inhibition correlates with increased CD8 IFNγ+ tumor infiltrating T cells. These hu-CB-BRGS mice provide a relevant preclinical animal model to facilitate prioritization of hypothesis-driven combination immunotherapies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0518-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on R0 resection rate for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreas cancer

370

Background: Management for borderline resectable pancreas cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC) is controversial. Multiagent chemotherapy (CT) followed by SBRT may allow for tumor downstaging and the ability to perform an R0 resection. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated BRPC and LAPC patients (pts) treated on our multidisciplinary treatment pathway. Pts underwent 2-3 months of CT. Pts without systemic progression received five fractions of SBRT, delivered every other day, to a dose of 30-33 Gy. After restaging, pts underwent surgery if resectable. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and local progression free survival (LPFS) were estimated and compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Results: We identified 80 pts with BRPC (65) or LAPC (15) treated with neoadjuvant CT + SBRT between 2011-2017. Median follow up was 20 months. CT primarily included FOLFIRINOX (65%) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (30%). Of pts completing CT + SBRT, 67 (84%) went to surgery and 53 (79%) of those pts underwent definitive surgery including seven LAPC patients. The remaining 14 pts underwent palliative or exploratory surgery due to intraoperative metastases (43%) or vascular involvement (57%). Of pts undergoing definitive surgery, 51 had R0 resection (96%) and 5 (9%) had a complete pathologic response (PR) to CT + SBRT. The R0 resection rate of the cohort was 64%. OS was 24.5 months. Pts with a complete or marked (14%) PR had significantly better OS than those with a moderate (40%) PR (41.3 vs 30 months, p = 0.04) and pts unable to undergo definitive surgery (18.2 months, p < 0.001). Zero of 11 pts who had a marked or complete PR had local progression, significant compared to those with moderate PR (p = 0.012). DMFS between these two groups was not statistically significantly different. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CT + SBRT are associated with favorable PR rates and R0 resection rates. Marked or complete PR was associated with improved LPFS and OS compared to moderate PR and pts who did not undergo definitive surgery. DMFS was not significantly different between complete and marked PR compared to those with moderate PR.

Impact of multidisciplinary management in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET)

629

Background: The incidence and prevalence of NETs is increasing and diagnosis and pathologic evaluation of NETs is complex. Given the new advances in local and systemic therapies, multidisciplinary management models have been suggested to assist in treatment decisions. However, scientific data showing definite change in management with multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) review is lacking. We aim to address this need in this study. Methods: 113 GI-NET patients from 2012-18 were reviewed from a dedicated MDC where patients are seen simultaneously by multiple subspecialties, and data on patient characteristics, radiology, tumor pathology and treatment strategies were collected. Change in diagnosis was defined as any change in radiographic or pathologic findings that resulted in a change in the tumor type, grade, site or stage of cancer. Change in management was defined as any recommended change in treatment approach for NETs compared to the prior treatment plan. For patients who did not have a prior treatment plan or were seen directly at MDC, a change of management was considered as yes only if there was a change in diagnosis post MDC. Results: The mean age of patients evaluated was 61, with locally advanced or metastatic disease seen in 81% of patients. Small bowel and pancreatic NETs were the most common primaries (36% each). Significant proportion of NETs were well-differentiated (72%) with < 2 mitosis/10 HPF (47.3%) and Ki-67 of < 3% (36%). Patients were referred to MDC at an average of 2.5 years from diagnosis, with 23% having the MDC as their first visit. 40% had prior resection of primary, 25% were on somatostatin analogues (SSAs) previously and 9% of patients had received prior liver directed therapy (LDT). A significant proportion of patients had change in diagnosis post MDC evaluation: change in site (7%), stage of disease (7%), tumor type (3.5%) and grade (0.1%). A change in management was recommended in 50% of patients, with SSAs recommended in 43.8%, surgery in 25.4% and LDT in 17.5% of the patients. Conclusions: The use of a dedicated MDC to manage NETs had a substantial impact in change in management in a significant percentage of patients evaluated. MDC care for patients diagnosed with NET is recommended for optimal management.

A phase Ib dose escalation study of vantictumab (VAN) in combination with nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) and gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated stage IV pancreatic cancer

249

Background: Vantictumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits Wnt pathway signaling through binding FZD1, 2, 5, 7, and 8 receptors. A phase Ib study of VAN in combination with Nab-P and G was performed in patients with untreated stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients received VAN at escalating doses (3-7 mg/kg) in combination with standard dosing of Nab-P and G according to a 3+3 design. Due to fragility fractures occurring in this and other related clinical trials, dosing on an every 2 week schedule in cohorts 1 and 2 was transitioned to every 4 week dosing for cohorts 3 through 5. In these later cohorts, a minimum of six patients were treated at each dose level and additional criteria for maximum tolerated dose (MTD) integrating bone safety parameters were added. The bone safety plan was also revised for these cohorts. Sequential dosing of VAN followed by Nab-P and G was explored in cohort 5. Results: Thirty-one patients (52% male, 48% female) were enrolled and treated in 5 dosing cohorts. Median age was 66. Most common study-treatment related adverse events were nausea (68%) and fatigue (52%). One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) event occurred in the study population—grade 3 dehydration in 1 of 9 patients in cohort 4 (5 mg/kg q4w). Fragility fractures attributed to VAN occurred in two patients in cohort 2 (7 mg/kg q2w). Once the dosing schedule was revised to every 4 weeks, the maximum administered VAN dose was 5 mg/kg. No fragility fractures attributed to VAN occurred in these cohorts; pathologic fracture not attributed to VAN was documented in 2 patients. The study was terminated due to lack of an acceptable therapeutic index. Partial response was documented in 13 patients (42%) and stable disease in 11 (36%). Conclusions: The MTD of VAN plus Nab-P and G was not determined, but the maximum administered dose (MAD) of VAN, 7 mg/kg every 2 weeks, was considered unsafe related to bone toxicity, a known effect of WNT inhibition. After the study was revised, the MAD was 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, with no protocol-specified bone toxicity observed (n = 16). Clinical trial information: NCT02005315.

Impact of radiation dose during neoadjuvant chemoradiation on postoperative complications in esophageal (EC) and gastroesophageal junction cancers (GEJC)

119

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by resection is standard of care for operable stage II-III EC and GEJC; however, it can be associated with significant risk of postoperative complications (POC). The CROSS study group reported no increase in POC severity with nCRT using 41.4 Gy compared to surgery alone as defined by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). We applied the CCI metric to evaluate the impact of nCRT radiation dose of < 50 Gy vs. ≥ 50 Gy on POC rates and compared to the CROSS rates. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 82 pts (2004-2016) with EC or GEJC treated with nCRT followed by resection at our institution. 29 (35%) pts were treated with < 50 Gy (range 39.6-46.8 Gy) and 53 (65%) were treated with ≥ 50 Gy (range 50.0-52.5 Gy) delivered using IMRT/VMAT (41%), 3D-CRT (46%), or tomotherapy IMRT (12%). Concurrent chemotherapy were carboplatin/paclitaxel (59%), cisplatin/5-FU (17%), or other (24%). Resection was performed by Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (67%), esophagogastrectomy (14%), or trans-hiatal approach (11%). POC within 30 days were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale and CCI scores were computed and compared between the two dose groups and with the CROSS nCRT group. Results: CCI scores and complication rates between our < 50 Gy and ≥ 50 Gy groups were not significantly different. Assuming a normal distribution of the CROSS CCI scores, there was no significant difference in CCI scores between the CROSS study nCRT, < 50 Gy, or ≥ 50 Gy groups. Rates of pulmonary complications were greater in the CROSS study. Conclusions: In highly selected EC and GEJC pts, definitive nCRT radiation doses do not appear to increase POC rates. Thus, 50 Gy can likely be delivered without increasing toxicity while also achieving a definitive dose for pts not able or willing to undergo subsequent surgery. [Table: see text]

Phase Ib Results of the Rational Combination of Selumetinib and Cyclosporin A in Advanced Solid Tumors with an Expansion Cohort in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

MEK inhibition is of interest in cancer drug development, but clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been limited. Preclinical studies demonstrated Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS-mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A, a noncanonical Wnt pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in mCRC patient-derived xenografts. To translate these results, we conducted a NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-approved multicenter phase I/IB trial (NCT02188264) of the combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A. Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with the combination of oral selumetinib and cyclosporin A in the dose escalation phase, followed by an expansion cohort of irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC. The expansion cohort utilized a single-agent selumetinib "run-in" to evaluate FZD2 biomarker upregulation and KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT stratification to identify any potential predictors of efficacy. Twenty and 19 patients were enrolled in dose escalation and expansion phases, respectively. The most common adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities were rash, hypertension, and edema. Three dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 hypertension, rash, and increased creatinine) were reported. The MTD was selumetinib 75 mg twice daily and cyclosporin A 2 mg/kg twice daily on a 28-day cycle. KRAS stratification did not identify any differences in response between KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT cancers. Two partial responses, 18 stable disease, and 10 progressive disease responses were observed. Combination selumetinib and cyclosporin A is well tolerated, with evidence of activity in mCRC. Future strategies for concept development include identifying better predictors of efficacy and improved Wnt pathway modulation.Significance: These findings translate preclinical studies combining selumetinib and cyclosporin into a phase I first-in-human clinical trial of such a combination in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5398-407. ©2018 AACR.

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Linsitinib (OSI-906), a Small-Molecule Dual Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor/Insulin Receptor Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Lessons Learned.

The maximum tolerated dose of the combination of linsitinib and irinotecan is linsitinib 450 mg daily on days 1–3 every 7 days and irinotecan 125 mg/m² days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle.

The adverse effects associated with the combination are not significantly increased beyond what is expected of each drug as a single agent.

Multiple negative trials of insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor inhibitors performed in unselected patient populations led to the early discontinuation of linistinib development and this trial.

Earlier integration of assessment of potential predictive biomarkers into clinical trials, as was planned in this study, is vital to the development of targeted therapies in oncology.

Background.

This phase I dose‐escalation study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of irinotecan and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor (IGF‐1R) inhibitor linsitinib in patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy.

Methods.

Dose escalation in three specified dose levels was performed according to a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose levels were as follows: (a) linsitinib 400 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m², (b) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m², and (c) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m². Linisitinib was administered once daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17, and irinotecan on days 1 and 8. Assessment of a candidate predictive biomarker was planned in all patients, with further evaluation in an expansion cohort of advanced colorectal cancer.

Results.

A total of 17 patients were treated, with 1 patient in both cohort 2 and 3 experiencing dose‐limiting toxicity. Linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m² was the maximum tolerated dose. Sixteen (94%) patients experienced at least one treatment‐related adverse event. Neutropenia was the only grade >3 toxicity (4%). No significant hyperglycemia or QT interval prolongation was noted. No objective responses were observed; 47% (n = 8) had stable disease with median duration of 5.25 months.

Conclusion.

Although the combination was determined safe, the study was halted due to termination of linsitinib development, and biomarker testing was not performed.

Immune and autoimmune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy

The recent development of monoclonal antibodies that disinhibit the immune system from recognizing and attacking tumor cells has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Among these agents are drugs that specifically block cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling, called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While these agents are generally well tolerated, ICI therapy can lead to loss of self-tolerance and the development of autoimmunity, manifesting as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Although potentially linked to increased antitumor responses, the morbidity associated with IRAEs can be significant and in rare circumstances, fatal. Virtually any organ can be affected and the patients present with a broad range of signs and symptoms. Moreover, ICIs have varying IRAEs and have distinct toxicity profiles based on their mechanism of action. Fortunately, most of the IRAEs can be managed with immunosuppression and supportive care, but contingent on early recognition and prompt treatment. With increasing advances in drug development, including combination ICI therapy, these agents are becoming one of the most prescribed oncology drugs and clinicians should be knowledgeable about the recognition and management of IRAEs.

Antitumor activity of the aurora a selective kinase inhibitor, alisertib, against preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Background

The Aurora kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases comprised of Aurora A, B, and C which execute critical steps in mitotic and meiotic progression. Alisertib (MLN8237) is an investigational Aurora A selective inhibitor that has demonstrated activity against a wide variety of tumor types in vitro and in vivo, including CRC.

Results

CRC cell lines demonstrated varying sensitivity to alisertib with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.06 to > 5 umol/L. Following exposure to alisertib we observed a decrease in pAurora A, B and C in four CRC cell lines. We also observed an increase in p53 and p21 in a sensitive p53 wildtype cell line in contrast to the p53 mutant cell line or the resistant cell lines. The addition of alisertib to standard CRC treatments demonstrated improvement over single agent arms; however, the benefit was largely less than additive, but not antagonistic.

Methods

Forty-seven CRC cell lines were exposed to alisertib and IC₅₀s were calculated. Twenty-one PDX models were treated with alisertib and the Tumor Growth Inhibition Index was assessed. Additionally, 5 KRAS wildtype and mutant PDX models were treated with alisertib as single agent or in combination with cetuximab or irinotecan, respectively.

Conclusion

Alisertib demonstrated anti-proliferative effects against CRC cell lines and PDX models. Our data suggest that the addition of alisertib to standard therapies in colorectal cancer if pursued clinically, will require further investigation of patient selection strategies and these combinations may facilitate future clinical studies.

Abstract A083: A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: MLN0128 is an oral inhibitor of mTOR kinase and mTORC1/2 signaling. Alisertib is an oral inhibitor of Aurora A kinase. Senescence and upregulation of genes in the PI3K/AKT/mTor pathway have been observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft models treated with alisertib, with greater tumor growth inhibition demonstrated in combination with MLN0128 as compared to each agent alone. An investigator-initiated trial was developed to evaluate the combination of MLN0128 and alisertib in patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by an expansion cohort in metastatic TNBC and other selected cancers. The goals of this ongoing study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the combination. Results of dose escalation are presented here. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were treated orally at escalating doses with the combination of MLN0128 daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib twice daily (BID) on days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was conducted according to a standard 3+3 design. Key eligibility criteria included HgbA1c &lt;7%, fasting serum glucose &lt;130mg/dL and fasting triglycerides &lt;300mg/dL, normal cardiac function, no condition with potential to cause excessive daytime sleepiness (including chronic hypoxia) and no risk of malabsorption of oral medications. PK assessments were performed at various time points after single-agent and combination dosing. Results: A total of 16 patients with refractory cancers were enrolled in dose escalation. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in dose level 1 (MLN0128 1mg/alisertib 30mg) or dose level 2 (2mg/30mg). At the third dose level (2mg/40mg) 2 of 7 patients experienced a DLT (grade 3 fatigue/confusion and grade 2 GERD/nausea leading to study discontinuation). In an alternate dose level cohort evaluating MLN0128 3mg and alisertib 30mg, 2 of 2 patients experienced a DLT of grade 3 fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was determined to be MLN0128 2mg daily and alisertib 30mg BID. Most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included alopecia, diarrhea, fatigue and rash in 19% each and nausea in 31% of patients. Most common Grade 3 AEs included fatigue (19%) and decreased neutrophil count (31%). Dose modification was required in 56% of patients, most often due to neutropenia. Median time on study was 3 cycles (range 1-15) at data cutoff. Best response of stable disease was observed in 5 patients (31%), with prolonged stable disease noted in a patient with ER+/HER2- breast cancer (15 cycles) and a patient with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (10 cycles). PK assessments indicate no significant drug interaction between agents. Cmax was 24.7 (± 13.6) ng/mL for MLN0128 and 1049 (±363) ng/mL for alisertib at combination MTD doses. MLN0128 AUC was 128.2 (±72.7) ng/mLxhr and alisertib AUC0-8 was 6119 (±2331) ng/mlxhr at these doses. Conclusions: MLN0128 2mg daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib 30mg BID days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle is the MTD of the drug combination. An expansion cohort in patients with TNBC and other selected cancers is currently enrolling at this dose. Functional imaging and serial tumor biopsies are being integrated into this cohort to assess the pharmacodynamic interactions of the combination.

Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Elaine T. Lam, Bradley R. Corr, Cindy L. O'Bryant, Ashley Glode, Nichole Adler, Todd M. Pitts, John J. Tentler, Anna Capasso, Kyrie Dailey, Natalie J. Serkova, Colin D. Weekes, Daniel L. Gustafson, Christopher H. Lieu, Wells A. Messersmith, Stephen Leong, S. Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R. Diamond. A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A083.

The impact of young adult colorectal cancer: incidence and trends in Colorado

Aim: Far less is known about colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in individuals under the age of 50. This study examined CRC incidence in order to better understand the changing CRC population. Methods: This study analyzed 39,525 CRC cases from the Colorado Central Cancer Registry from 1992 through 2013. Age-adjusted incidence, observed and relative 5-year survival, and estimated annual percentage change was analyzed. Results: Age-adjusted rates averaging 1.7% per year were observed in the under-50 population, while falling on average 4.3% per year (p < 0.05) in the over-50 population. Average-adjusted incidence rose in males under 50 by 2.7% per year (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The absolute incidence of CRC continues to fall in Colorado, however incidence is rising in individuals under 50, particularly males.

Abstract CT063: Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of INCB054828 in patients (pts) with advanced, metastatic, or surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with inadequate response to prior therapy

Background: Dysregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling by FGFR translocations and activating mutations is implicated in many cancers, including CCA. FGFR2 translocations are the most common FGFR alterations, which occur in ~13% of pts with intrahepatic CCA and involve a variety of fusion partners/breakpoints. INCB054828 is a novel, orally available, selective inhibitor of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 tyrosine kinase activities (AACR 2015; Abstract 771).

Methods: This phase 2, open-label trial will evaluate INCB054828 monotherapy in pts with advanced/metastatic or surgically unresectable CCA (Table; NCT02924376). Pts will be prescreened centrally for FGF/FGFR status and enrolled in the following cohorts prior to start of treatment: FGFR2 translocations (Cohort A); other FGF/FGFR alterations (Cohort B); no FGF/FGFR alterations (Cohort C; negative control for effects of FGF/FGFR alterations on objective response rate [ORR]). Pts must be aged ≥18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, disease progression after ≥1 prior systemic therapy, and no prior use of selective FGFR inhibitors. Pts will self-administer INCB054828 orally at a starting dose of 13.5 mg once-daily on a 21-day cycle (2 weeks on; 1 week off); treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint will be ORR (complete or partial response per independent radiologic review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1) in pts with FGFR2 translocations (Cohort A). Secondary endpoints will include ORR in pts positive or negative for any FGF/FGFR alterations and duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety (all cohorts). The study is currently open for enrollment (estimated primary completion date, April, 2018).

Study DesignPrescreen for FGF/FGFR Status• Adults with metastatic/surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma with disease progression after ≥1 previous systemic treatment- FGFR2 translocations → cohort A (n~60)- Other FGF/FGFR alterations → cohort B (n~20)- No FGF/FGFR alterations → cohort C (n~20)Screen for eligibility criteria and patient characteristics• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2• Adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN; ≤2.5 × ULN for Gilbert syndrome or disease involving liver]; aminotransferases &lt;2.5 × ULN [&lt;5 × ULN with liver metastases])• Adequate renal function (creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min; serum phosphate &gt;institutional ULN; serum calcium &gt;institutional normal range; potassium &gt;institutional lower limit of normal)• Life expectancy ≥12 weeksEnroll and initiate INCB054828 treatment• Oral once daily dosing: 21-day (2-weeks-on/1-week-off) cycleStart response assessment after cycle 2• Stable disease/partial or complete response → continue treatment with restaging after cycle 4; imaging assessments increase to every 3 cycles after cycle 4• Disease progression → discontinue treatment; safety and survival follow-up

Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, S. Lindsey Davis, Maeve A. Lowery, Ekaterine Asatiani, Christine F. Lihou, Huiling Zhen, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa. Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of INCB054828 in patients (pts) with advanced, metastatic, or surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with inadequate response to prior therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT063. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT063

Abstract IA20: Challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned in the bench-to-bedside translation of xenopatient studies

Progress in oncology drug development has been hampered by a lack of preclinical models that reliably predict clinical activity of novel compounds in cancer patients. This is thought to be largely due to the inability of cell culture and cell line xenograft models to faithfully recapitulate the complex genetic and histologic heterogeneity of tumors. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, the topic of this meeting, have been shown to be biologically stable when passaged in mice in terms of global gene expression patterns, mutational status, drug responsiveness, and tumor architecture, thus providing an opportunity for more efficient and effective preclinical drug development. Potential applications include initial drug activity screening, biomarker development, assessment of combination strategies, and more recently, testing of immunotherapy strategies in humanized PDX models. With escalating concerns over heterogeneity between primary and metastatic sites and within the tumor itself, PDX models may also provide a platform for studying the evolution of heterogeneity, particularly within the context of drug resistance mechanisms. Despite all of the theoretical advantages of these models and potential novel applications, academic labs, which operate on a smaller scale than industry, must continue to refine and assess the opportunities and limitations of PDX models in order to ensure the greatest bench-to-bedside translation of novel therapies. Our group has been working with PDX models over the last seven years and has developed a large and robust bank of PDX models of which the majority has undergone full genomic annotation. In this session on practical applications of PDX models, specific examples will be presented that represent distinct scenarios of preclinical development within the context of the opportunities, challenges, and lessons learned in utilizing these models in xenopatient trials. There is no doubt that PDX models represent a more clinically relevant platform for oncology drug development, but it will be important to recognize their strengths and weaknesses in order to fully exploit their potential in the drug development process. This is particularly important for academic labs where partnerships with industry are valuable and resources may be limited.

Citation Format: S. Gail Eckhardt, Todd Pitts, Aik Choon Tan, Stacey Bagby, John Arcaroli, Anna Capasso, Kit Wong, Peter Klauck, Wells Messersmith, S Lindsey Davis, Christopher Lieu, Stephen Leong, Jennifer Diamond, John Tentler. Challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned in the bench-to-bedside translation of xenopatient studies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr IA20.

Abstract PR03: Characterizing the immune context of responses to immunotherapy in humanized patient derived xenograft models of CRC

Introduction: Inhibiting the activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with monoclonal antibodies has been utilized as a therapeutic strategy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), leading to improved clinical results alone and in combination with standard chemotherapy. Many systematic reviews and metanalyses were performed to better understand the role of EGFR inhibition in CRC, revealing that KRAS exon 2 mutations and furthermore exons 3 and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 were predictive of non-responsiveness to these agents. Concurrent with these results has been the development of immunotherapy targeting immune regulatory checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 that have initiated a new era in the treatment of cancer. In order to gain a better biological understanding of the context of immune responses and facilitate preclinical evaluation of cancer immunotherapy, we developed a hematopoietic humanized mouse model utilizing patient-derived CRC xenograft tumor models to assess immune therapy for RAS mutant CRC. Not only could evaluation of humanized RAS mutant PDX models provide additional information on the potential for clinical activity of immune therapies, but could also improve the understanding of immune responses to RAS mutant cancers. We therefore hypothesize that humanized RAS mutant colorectal PDX models can be used to evaluate the preclinical activity of immune targeted agents for treatment of RAS mutant colorectal cancer.

Methods: Humanized BRG mice developed from the BALB/cRag2-/-IL2Rγc-/- (BRG) strain which is known to accept human hematopoietic stem cells, have been used to enhance engraftment. BRG newborn pups were humanized through transplantation of approximately 1x105 CD34+ cells purified from umbilical cord blood. The mice were evaluated for chimerism at 8 and 12 weeks. At 14 weeks, tumor tissue from established PDX models were implanted on the right and left flank of humanized mice. The tumor was selected among a cluster within the “immune-enriched” subtype (C2) based upon the RNAseq characterization of the models. When the average tumor size reached a volume of approximately ~150-300 mm3, the mice were randomized into either vehicle or nivolumab treatment groups. Mice were monitored daily for signs of toxicity and weighed twice weekly. They were treated with nivolumab (30 mg/kg) twice a week by intraperitoneal injection for 15 days. Tumor size was evaluated twice weekly by caliper measurements using the following equation: tumor volume= (length × width2) × 0.52. At the end of the treatment, mice were euthanized while sera, lymph nodes, spleen, bone marrow and tumors were collected for further investigation.

Results: Humanized RAS mutant CRC PDX models were successfully established in vivo. While no differences were observed in tumor growth among the control and treated arms, we were able to detect differences in PD1 expression among treated versus control mice, with lower expression in the nivolumab treated group. We also observed higher numbers of T cells in the lymph nodes of nivolumab treated mice, suggesting T cell expansion. Interestingly, we also observed an increase of T cells in the spleen and blood and late occupancy of T cells in the bone marrow. Two of the treated mice exhibited identifiable TILs that were comprised of a majority of CD4+ T cells with an activated phenotype (CD69+).

Conclusions: Humanized KRAS mutant CRC PDX models were successfully established and tumor engraftment occurred in all humanized mice with nivolumab-treated mice demonstrating the development of lymph nodes that were populated by activated T cells. These preliminary results demonstrate that human immunity and PD-1 expressing T cells exist in these models and provide the basis for planned immunotherapy combination studies.

This abstract is also being presented as Poster A23.

Citation Format: Anna Capasso, Julie Lang, Todd M. Pitts, S. Lindsey Davis, Chris H. Lieu, Stacey M. Bagby, Aik Choon Tan, John J. Tentler, Jill E. Slansky, Roberta Pelanda, S. Gail Eckhardt. Characterizing the immune context of responses to immunotherapy in humanized patient derived xenograft models of CRC. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr PR03.