Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea: An Overview of a Multisite Program to Enhance Local Response Capacity for Antibiotic-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae

BACKGROUND

In 2016, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG) in multiple jurisdictions to enhance antibiotic resistant gonorrhea rapid detection and response infrastructure and evaluate the impact of key strategies.

METHODS

Eight jurisdictions were funded to establish or enhance local gonococcal culture specimen collection in sexually transmitted disease and community clinics, conduct rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in local laboratories, modify systems for enhanced data collection and rapid communication of results, and initiate enhanced partner services among patients with gonorrhea demonstrating elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftriaxone, cefixime or azithromycin.

RESULTS

Grantees incorporated genital, pharyngeal, and rectal gonococcal culture collection from all genders at participating clinics. During 2018 to 2019, grantees collected 58,441 culture specimens from 46,822 patients and performed AST on 10,814 isolates (representing 6.8% [3412] and 8.9% [4883] of local reported cases in 2018 and 2019, respectively). Of isolates that underwent AST, 11% demonstrated elevated azithromycin MICs; fewer than 0.5% demonstrated elevated ceftriaxone or cefixime MICs. Among patients whose infections demonstrated elevated MICs, 81.7% were interviewed for partner elicitation; however, limited new cases were identified among partners and contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

As a public health model to build capacity to slow the spread of emerging resistance, SURRG successfully expanded culture collection, implemented rapid AST, and implemented an enhanced partner services investigation approach in participating jurisdictions. Findings from SURRG may enhance preparedness efforts and inform a longer-term, comprehensive, and evidence-based public health response to emerging gonococcal resistance. Continued development of innovative approaches to address emerging resistance is needed.

Test of Cure Return Rate and Test Positivity, Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea, United States, 2018-2019

BACKGROUND

Reduced antibiotic susceptibility (RS) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) may increase treatment failure. Conducting tests of cure (TOC) for patients with RS-GC may facilitate identification of treatment failures.

METHODS

We examined 2018 to 2019 data from 8 jurisdictions participating in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Strengthening US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea project. Jurisdictions collected GC isolates and epidemiological data from patients and performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of ceftriaxone, 0.125 μg/mL or greater; cefixime, 0.250 μg/mL or greater; or azithromycin, 2.0 μg/mL or greater were defined as RS. Patients with RS infections were asked to return for a TOC 8 to 10 days posttreatment. We calculated a weighted TOC return rate and described time to TOC and suspected reasons for any positive TOC results.

RESULTS

Overall, 1165 patients were diagnosed with RS infections. Over half returned for TOC (weighted TOC, 61%; 95% confidence interval, 50.1%-72.6%; range by jurisdiction, 32%-80%). Test of cure rates were higher among asymptomatic (68%) than symptomatic patients (53%, P = 0.001), and men who have sex with men (62%) compared with men who have sex with women (50%; P < 0.001). Median time between treatment and TOC was 12 days (interquartile range, 9-16). Of the 31 (4.5%) TOC patients with positive results, 13 (42%) were suspected because of reinfection and 11 (36%) because of false-positive results. There were no treatment failures suspected to be due to RS-GC.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with a RS infection returned for a TOC, though return rates varied by jurisdiction and patient characteristics. Test of cure can identify and facilitate treatment of reinfections, but false-positive TOC results may complicate interpretation and clinical management.

Impact of Anatomic Site, Specimen Collection Timing, and Patient Symptom Status on Neisseria gonorrhoeae Culture Recovery

BACKGROUND

Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture is required for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, but recovering isolates from clinical specimens is challenging. Although many variables influence culture recovery, studies evaluating the impact of culture specimen collection timing and patient symptom status are limited. This study analyzed urogenital and extragenital culture recovery data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG) program, a multisite project, which enhances local N. gonorrhoeae culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing capacity.

METHODS

Eight SURRG jurisdictions collected gonococcal cultures from patients with N. gonorrhoeae-positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results attending sexually transmitted disease and community clinics. Matched NAAT and culture specimens from the same anatomic site were collected, and culture recovery was assessed. Time between NAAT and culture specimen collection was categorized as same day, 1 to 7 days, 8 to 14 days, or ≥15 days, and patient symptoms were matched to the anatomic site where culture specimens were collected.

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2019, among persons with N. gonorrhoeae-positive NAAT, urethral infections resulted in the highest culture recovery (5927 of 6515 [91.0%]), followed by endocervical (222 of 363 [61.2%]), vaginal (63 of 133 [47.4%]), rectal (1117 of 2805 [39.8%]), and pharyngeal (1019 of 3678 [27.7%]) infections. Culture recovery was highest when specimens were collected on the same day as NAAT specimens and significantly decreased after 7 days. Symptoms were significantly associated with culture recovery at urethral (P = <0.0001) and rectal (P = <0.0001) sites of infection but not endocervical, vaginal, or pharyngeal sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Culture specimen collection timing and patient symptomatic status can impact culture recovery. These findings can guide decisions about culture collection protocols to maximize culture recovery and strengthen detection of antimicrobial-resistant infections.