1
|
Sathishkumar K, Sankarapillai J, Mathew A, Nair RA, Gangane N, Khuraijam S, Barmon D, Pandya S, Majumdar G, Deshmane V, Zomawia E, Bhutia TW, Jerang K, George PS, Maliye S, Laishram R, Das G, Shah A, Debbarma S, Koyande S, Pachuau L, Sherpa A, Jongkey G, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Santhappan S, Mathur P. Breast cancer survival in India across 11 geographic areas under the National Cancer Registry Programme. Cancer 2024; 130:1816-1825. [PMID: 38183671 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based cancer survival is a key indicator for assessing the effectiveness of cancer control by a health care system in a specific geographic area. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in India, accounting for over one quarter of all female cancers. The objective of this study was to estimate the 5-year survival of female patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer between 2012 and 2015 from the existing Population-Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) in India. METHODS In total, 17,331 patients who had breast cancer diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 from 11 PBCRs were followed until June 30, 2021. Active methods were used to track the vital status of registered breast cancer cases. The study conducted survival analysis by calculating the difference between the date of first diagnosis and the date of death or censoring to estimate observed survival and relative survival using the actuarial survival approach and the Ederer-II approach, respectively. RESULTS The 5-year age-standardized relative survival (95% confidence interval [CI]) of patients with breast cancer was 66.4% (95% CI, 65.5%-67.3%). Mizoram (74.9%; 95% CI, 68.1%-80.8%), Ahmedabad urban (72.7%; 95% CI, 70.3%-74.9%), Kollam (71.5%; 95% CI, 69.2%-73.6%), and Thiruvananthapuram (69.1%; 95% CI, 67.0%-71.2%) had higher survival rates than the national average. Conversely, Pasighat had the lowest survival rate (41.9%; 95% CI, 14.7%-68.6%). The 5-year observed survival rates for localized, regional, and distant metastasis in the pooled PBCRs were 81.0%, 65.5%, and 18.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The overall disparity in survival rates was observed across 11 PBCRs, with lower survival rates reported in Manipur, Tripura, and Pasighat. Therefore, it is imperative to implement comprehensive cancer control strategies widely throughout the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnan Sathishkumar
- National Center for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Jayasankar Sankarapillai
- National Center for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Rekha A Nair
- Regional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Nitin Gangane
- Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
| | | | | | - Shashank Pandya
- The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | | | | | - Eric Zomawia
- National Health Mission, Health and Family Welfare, Government of Mizoram, Aizawl, Mizoram, India
| | | | - Kaling Jerang
- Bakin Pertin General Hospital, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, India
| | | | - Swapna Maliye
- Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rajesh Laishram
- Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India
| | - Gaurav Das
- Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Anand Shah
- The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | | | | | - Lalawmpuii Pachuau
- National Health Mission, Health and Family Welfare, Government of Mizoram, Aizawl, Mizoram, India
| | | | - Gegong Jongkey
- Bakin Pertin General Hospital, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, India
| | - Meesha Chaturvedi
- National Center for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Priyanka Das
- National Center for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Stephen Santhappan
- National Center for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Prashant Mathur
- National Center for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sathishkumar K, Sankarapillai J, Mathew A, Nair RA, Gangane N, Khuraijam S, Barmon D, Pandya S, Majumdar G, Deshmane V, Zomawia E, Bhutia TW, Jerang K, George PS, Maliye S, Laishram R, Shah A, Debbarma S, Koyande S, Pachuau L, Pradhan PD, Jongkey G, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Mathur P. Survival of patients with cervical cancer in India - findings from 11 population based cancer registries under National Cancer Registry Programme. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia 2024; 24:100296. [PMID: 38756162 PMCID: PMC11096662 DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Background Cancer survival data from Population Based Cancer Registries (PBCR) reflect the average outcome of patients in the population, which is critical for cancer control efforts. Despite decreasing incidence rates, cervical cancer is the second most common female cancer in India, accounting for 10% of all female cancers. The objective of the study is to estimate the five-year survival of patients with cervical cancer diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 from the PBCRs in India. Methods A single primary incidence of cervical cancer cases of 11 PBCRs (2012-2015) was followed till June 30, 2021 (n = 5591). Active follow-ups were conducted through hospital visits, telephone calls, home or field visits, and public databases. Five-year Observed Survival (OS) and Age Standardised Relative Survival (ASRS) was calculated. OS was measured by age and clinical extent of disease for cervical cancers. Findings The five-year ASRS (95% CI) of cervical cancer was 51.7% (50.2%-53.3%). Ahmedabad urban (61.5%; 57.4%-65.4%) had a higher survival followed by Thiruvananthapuram (58.8%; 53.1%-64.3%) and Kollam (56.1%; 50.7%-61.3%). Tripura had the lowest overall survival rate (31.6%; 27.2%-36.1%). The five-year OS% for pooled PBCRs was 65.9%, 53.5%, and 18.0% for localised, regional, and distant metastasis, respectively. Interpretation We observed a wide variation in cervical cancer survival within India. The findings of this study would help the policymakers to identify and address inequities in the health system. We re-emphasise the importance of awareness, early detection, and increase the improvement of the health care system. Funding The National Cancer Registry Programme is funded through intra-mural funding by Indian Council of Medical Research, Department of Health Research, India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnan Sathishkumar
- National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India
| | - Jayasankar Sankarapillai
- National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India
| | | | | | - Nitin Gangane
- Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, India
| | | | | | | | | | - Vinay Deshmane
- Indian Cancer Society, Mumbai, India
- P.D.Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Eric Zomawia
- National Health Mission, Health & Family Welfare, Government of Mizoram, India
| | | | - Kaling Jerang
- Bakin Pertin General Hospital, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, India
| | | | - Swapna Maliye
- Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, India
| | | | - Anand Shah
- The Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute, India
| | | | | | - Lalawmpuii Pachuau
- National Health Mission, Health & Family Welfare, Government of Mizoram, India
| | | | - Gegong Jongkey
- Bakin Pertin General Hospital, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, India
| | - Meesha Chaturvedi
- National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India
| | - Priyanka Das
- National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India
| | - Prashant Mathur
- National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deshmane V, Koyande S, Jadhav S. Abstract PS7-85: Population based survival of breast cancer in Greater Mumbai, India. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps7-85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
Population based survival provides a measure of the efficacy of cancer control in a defined geographical area. The Mumbai Cancer Registry (MCR), India’s oldest population based cancer registry (PBCR), was established by the Indian Cancer Society (ICS) in 1963. It covers 603 sq. km. of Greater Mumbai with a population of 146, 51,584 (2015) and over half a century it has consistently provided cancer statistics from its coverage area. Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women in Mumbai constituting 30% of all female cancers, and is now the most common cancer in women in India (1, 62,468 in 2018), constituting 27.66% of all female cancers. There have been few reports on breast cancer survival from India, and in this study, we report the survival rate of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Greater Mumbai during the years 2009-13.
Patients and Methods:
Breast cancer cases registered during the years 2009-13 with the MCR were followed for outcome till 31 Dec 2018. Social investigators visited hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, hospices and laboratory centers for documenting cancer cases. Mortality data was collected from the Vital Statistics Division of the Municipal Corporation. Data and was verified and duplicate cases were deleted. Follow up was conducted with repeated scrutiny of medical records, death certificates issued by the Municipal Corporation, postal and telephone enquiries, house visits and linkage with electoral database. Observed survival was calculated by the Kaplan Meir (1958) method. Expected survival was calculated using the national life-table of India for (Maharashtra) based on Census of India, 2011. Using observed and expected survival, relative survival was calculated by Ederer (1961) method using STATA 12.0. The survival rate was compared to that from other regions of India and with developed countries.
Results: Of the 9707 breast cancer cases registered during the period 2009-13, 8031 (83%) cases were included in this study. 1676 (17%) cases were excluded as 469 (5%) had only Death Certificate Information and 1207 (12%) were lost to follow up. The median follow up was 5.1 years (range 8 months - 9 years). The median age was 55 years (range 18 -96 years) with 2725(34%) ≤ 50 years and 5306 (66%) > 50 years. The overall observed survival rates at 1, 3, 5 years were 82.5%, 72.8% and 67.0% respectively and the corresponding figures for relative survival were 83.5%, 75.4%, and 70.9%. Increasing age had an inverse relationship with breast cancer survival. The highest 5-year relative survival was shown by ≤29 age group (74%) and lowest by >70 age group (60%). Those with localised disease at diagnosis had a higher 5-year relative survival rate (84%) compared to 79.7% for direct extension and 20.8% for distant metastasis. The clinical extent of disease and education were significant risk factors affecting survival (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:The 5-year population-based survival of patients treated in Greater Mumbai during the period 2009-2013, is 70%. This compares favourably with previously reported 5-year survival from Mumbai (51-55.7%) and other Indian registry data (33-55%), but is inferior to that reported in the developed world (84-88 %). The association of survival with educational status and stage at diagnosis highlights the importance of awareness and early detection. Enhanced awareness and detection coupled with easy access to adequate and affordable treatment could help improve breast cancer outcomes.
Citation Format: Vinay Deshmane, Shravani Koyande, Shweta Jadhav. Population based survival of breast cancer in Greater Mumbai, India [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-85.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Deshmane
- Mumbai Cancer Registry,Indian Cancer Society, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Shweta Jadhav
- Mumbai Cancer Registry,Indian Cancer Society, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koyande S, Subramanian S, Edwards P, Hoover S, Deshmane V, Tankga F, Dikshit R, Saraiya M. Economic evaluation of Mumbai and its satellite cancer registries: Implications for expansion of data collection. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 45 Suppl 1:S43-S49. [PMID: 27726981 PMCID: PMC5847316 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2016] [Revised: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Mumbai Cancer Registry is a population-based cancer registry that has been in operation for more than five decades and has successfully initiated and integrated three satellite registries in Pune, Nagpur, and Aurangabad, each covering specific urban populations of the Indian state Maharashtra. Data collectors at the satellites perform data abstraction, but Mumbai carries out all other core registration activities such as data analysis and quality assurance. Each of the three satellite registries follows the same data collection methodology as the main Mumbai Cancer Registry. This study examines the cost of operating the Mumbai and its satellite cancer registries. METHODS We modified and used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) International Registry Costing Tool (IntRegCosting Tool) to collect cost and resource use data for the Mumbai Cancer Registry and three satellites. RESULTS Almost 60% of the registration expenditure was borne by the Indian Cancer Society, which hosts the Mumbai Cancer Registry, and more than half of the registry expenditure was related to data collection activities. Across the combined registries, 93% of the expenditure was spent on labor. Overall, registration activities had a low cost per case of 226.10 Indian rupees (or a little less than 4.00 US dollars in 2014 [used average exchange rate in 2014: 1 US $=60 Indian rupees]). CONCLUSION The centralization of fixed-cost activities in Mumbai likely resulted in economies of scale in operating the Mumbai and satellite registries, which, together, report on almost 20,000 cancer cases annually. In middle-income countries like India, where financial resources are limited, the operational framework provided by the Mumbai and satellite registries can serve as a model for other registries looking to expand data collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sujha Subramanian
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| | - Patrick Edwards
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Sonja Hoover
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Florence Tankga
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Mona Saraiya
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parikh PM, Ranade AA, Govind B, Ghadyalpatil N, Singh R, Bharath R, Bhattacharyya GS, Koyande S, Singhal M, Vora A, Verma A, Hingmire S. Lung cancer in India: Current status and promising strategies. South Asian J Cancer 2016; 5:93-5. [PMID: 27606289 PMCID: PMC4991145 DOI: 10.4103/2278-330x.187563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P M Parikh
- Asian Cancer Institute, KJ Somaiya Ayurvihar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A A Ranade
- Avinash Cancer Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Babu Govind
- Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | | | - R Singh
- HCG Cancer Center, New Delhi, India
| | - R Bharath
- Kovai Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - S Koyande
- Indian Cancer Society, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - M Singhal
- Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - A Vora
- Max Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - A Verma
- Max Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - S Hingmire
- Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Godbole SV, Nandy K, Gauniyal M, Nalawade P, Sane S, Koyande S, Toyama J, Hegde A, Virgo P, Bhatia K, Paranjape RS, Risbud AR, Mbulaiteye SM, Mitsuyasu RT. HIV and cancer registry linkage identifies a substantial burden of cancers in persons with HIV in India. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4850. [PMID: 27631245 PMCID: PMC5402588 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
We utilized computerized record-linkage methods to link HIV and cancer databases with limited unique identifiers in Pune, India, to determine feasibility of linkage and obtain preliminary estimates of cancer risk in persons living with HIV (PLHIV) as compared with the general population.Records of 32,575 PLHIV were linked to 31,754 Pune Cancer Registry records (1996-2008) using a probabilistic-matching algorithm. Cancer risk was estimated by calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) in the early (4-27 months after HIV registration), late (28-60 months), and overall (4-60 months) incidence periods. Cancers diagnosed prior to or within 3 months of HIV registration were considered prevalent.Of 613 linked cancers to PLHIV, 188 were prevalent, 106 early incident, and 319 late incident. Incident cancers comprised 11.5% AIDS-defining cancers (ADCs), including cervical cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but not Kaposi sarcoma (KS), and 88.5% non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs). Risk for any incident cancer diagnosis in early, late, and combined periods was significantly elevated among PLHIV (SIRs: 5.6 [95% CI 4.6-6.8], 17.7 [95% CI 15.8-19.8], and 11.5 [95% CI 10-12.6], respectively). Cervical cancer risk was elevated in both incidence periods (SIRs: 9.6 [95% CI 4.8-17.2] and 22.6 [95% CI 14.3-33.9], respectively), while NHL risk was elevated only in the late incidence period (SIR: 18.0 [95% CI 9.8-30.20]). Risks for NADCs were dramatically elevated (SIR > 100) for eye-orbit, substantially (SIR > 20) for all-mouth, esophagus, breast, unspecified-leukemia, colon-rectum-anus, and other/unspecified cancers; moderately elevated (SIR > 10) for salivary gland, penis, nasopharynx, and brain-nervous system, and mildly elevated (SIR > 5) for stomach. Risks for 6 NADCs (small intestine, testis, lymphocytic leukemia, prostate, ovary, and melanoma) were not elevated and 5 cancers, including multiple myeloma not seen.Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using probabilistic record-linkage to study cancer/other comorbidities among PLHIV in India and provides preliminary population-based estimates of cancer risks in PLHIV in India. Our results, suggesting a potentially substantial burden and slightly different spectrum of cancers among PLHIV in India, support efforts to conduct multicenter linkage studies to obtain precise estimates and to monitor cancer risk in PLHIV in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheela V. Godbole
- National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR), Pune, India
- Correspondence: Sheela V. Godbole, National AIDS Research Institute-ICMR, 73, G Block, MIDC Bhosari, Pune 411026, India (e-mail: , )
| | - Karabi Nandy
- School of Nursing and Department Of Biostatistics University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA
| | | | | | - Suvarna Sane
- National AIDS Research Institute (ICMR), Pune, India
| | - Shravani Koyande
- Mumbai (Bombay) Cancer Registry, Indian Cancer Society, Mumbai, India
| | - Joy Toyama
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA
| | - Asha Hegde
- Maharashtra State AIDS Control Society, Mumbai, India
| | - Phil Virgo
- Computer Services Corporation, Rockville
| | - Kishor Bhatia
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | - Sam M. Mbulaiteye
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ronald T. Mitsuyasu
- University of California, Centre for AIDS Research and Education, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shridhar K, Rajaraman P, Koyande S, Parikh PM, Chaturvedi P, Dhillon PK, Dikshit RP. Trends in mouth cancer incidence in Mumbai, India (1995-2009): An age-period-cohort analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 42:66-71. [PMID: 27043865 PMCID: PMC4911594 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Revised: 03/12/2016] [Accepted: 03/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite tobacco control and health promotion efforts, the incidence rates of mouth cancer are increasing across most regions in India. Analysing the influence of age, time period and birth cohort on these secular trends can point towards underlying factors and help identify high-risk populations for improved cancer control programmes. METHODS We evaluated secular changes in mouth cancer incidence among men and women aged 25-74 years in Mumbai between 1995 and 2009 by calculating age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates (ASR). We estimated the age-adjusted linear trend for annual percent change (EAPC) using the drift parameter, and conducted an age-period-cohort (APC) analysis to quantify recent time trends and to evaluate the significance of birth cohort and calendar period effects. RESULTS Over the 15-year period, age-standardized incidence rates of mouth cancer in men in Mumbai increased by 2.7% annually (95% CI:1.9 to 3.4), p<0.0001) while rates among women decreased (EAPC=-0.01% (95% CI:-0.02 to -0.002), p=0.03). APC analysis revealed significant non-linear positive period and cohort effects in men, with higher effects among younger men (25-49 years). Non-significant increasing trends were observed in younger women (25-49 years). CONCLUSIONS APC analyses from the Mumbai cancer registry indicate a significant linear increase of mouth cancer incidence from 1995 to 2009 in men, which was driven by younger men aged 25-49 years, and a non-significant upward trend in similarly aged younger women. Health promotion efforts should more effectively target younger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krithiga Shridhar
- Centre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries, Public Health Foundation of India, 4th Floor, Plot No. 47, Sector 44, Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, India.
| | | | - Shravani Koyande
- Mumbai Cancer Registry, 74, Jerbai Wadia Road, Bhoiwada, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
| | - Purvish M Parikh
- Mumbai Cancer Registry, 74, Jerbai Wadia Road, Bhoiwada, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
| | - Pankaj Chaturvedi
- Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India.
| | - Preet K Dhillon
- Centre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries, Public Health Foundation of India, 4th Floor, Plot No. 47, Sector 44, Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, India.
| | - Rajesh P Dikshit
- Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rangamani S, SathishKumar K, Manoharan N, Julka PK, Rath GK, Shanta V, Swaminathan R, Rama R, Datta K, Mandal S, Koyande S, Deshmane V, Ganesh B, Banavali SD, Badwe RA, Ramesh C, Appaji L, Nandakumar A. Paediatric retinoblastoma in India: evidence from the National Cancer Registry Programme. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 16:4193-8. [PMID: 26028071 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.10.4193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy occurring in children. This paper documents the recent incidence rates of retinoblastoma by age and sex groups from the Population Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) of Bangalore, Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi and Kolkata using the data from the National Cancer Registry Programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS Relative proportions, sex ratio, method of diagnosis, and incidence rates (crude and age standardized) for each PBCR and pooled rates of the five PBCRs were calculated for the years 2005/06 to 2009/10. Standard errors and 95% confidence limits of ASIRs by sex group in each PBCR were calculated using the Poisson distribution. Standardised rate ratios of ASIR by sex group and rate ratios at risk were also calculated. RESULTS The maximum retinoblastoma cases were in the 0-4 age group, accounting for 78% (females) and 81% (males) of pooled cases from five PBCRs. The pooled crude incidence rate in the 0-14 age group was 3.5 and the pooled ASIR was 4.4 per million. The pooled ASIR in the 0-4, 5-9 and 10-14 age group were 9.6, 2.0 and 0.1 respectively. The M/F ratio in Chennai (1.9) and Bangalore PBCRs (2.0) was much higher than the other PBCRs. Among the PBCRs, the highest incidence rate in 0-4 age group was found in males in Chennai (21.7 per million), and females in Kolkata (18.9 per million). There was a distinct variation in incidence rates in the PBCRs in different geographic regions of India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukanya Rangamani
- National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, India E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Context: Breast cancer incidence rates are high in developed countries and much lower in less developed countries including India. Aims: The aim of the following study is to compare breast cancer incidence rates in rural, urban and metro regions of India and to estimate risk of developing breast cancer associated with residence in a rural area. Settings and Design: Descriptive and analytical study design. Materials and Methods: We extracted age adjusted incidence rate from 26 population-based cancer registries and data from hospital-based case-control study to estimate rate and risk ratio for developing breast cancer in an urban region compared with a rural residence. Statistical Analysis: The rate ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) for developing breast cancer in the urban and metro region compared with rural registry of Barshi were estimated. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for developing breast cancer in women residing in a rural region was estimated by fitting unconditional logistic regression using hospital-based case-control study data. Average annual percentage change in most recent 15 years (1996-2010) for Barshi (rural), Aurangabad (urban), and Mumbai (metro) cancer registry was obtained by fitting a log-linear model using joint point regression. Results: Living first 20 years of life in a rural area reduces the risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.76). Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that lifestyle operative in a rural area is protective against risk of developing breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R T Nagrani
- Department of Epidemiology, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dikshit RP, Nagrani R, Yeole B, Koyande S, Banawali S. Changing trends of chronic myeloid leukemia in greater Mumbai, India over a period of 30 years. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2012; 32:96-100. [PMID: 22174498 PMCID: PMC3237188 DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.89792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Little is known about burden of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in India. There is a recent interest to observe incidence and mortality because of advent of new diagnostic and treatment policies for CML. Materials and Methods: We extracted data from the oldest population-based cancer registry of Mumbai for 30 years period from 1976−2005 to observe incidence and mortality rates of CML. We classified the data into four age groups 0–14, 15–29, 30–54 and 55–74 to observe incidence rates in the respective age groups. Results: The age specific rates were highest for the age group of 55–74 years. No significant change in trends of CML was observed for 30 years period. However, there was a significant reduction in incidence rate for recent 15-years period (Estimated average annual percentage change=-3.9). No significant reduction in mortality rate was observed till 2005. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that age-specific rates for CML are highest in age group of 55-74 years, although they are lower compared to western populations. Significant reduction in incidence of CML in recent periods might be because of reduced misclassification of leukemias. The data of CML has to be observed for another decade to witness reduction in mortality because of changes in treatment management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh P Dikshit
- Department of Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|