Risk–Benefit assessment of foods: Development of a methodological framework for the harmonized selection of nutritional, microbiological, and toxicological components

Investigating the impact of diet on public health using risk–benefit assessment (RBA) methods that simultaneously consider both beneficial and adverse health outcomes could be useful for shaping dietary policies and guidelines. In the field of food safety and nutrition, RBA is a relatively new approach facing methodological challenges and being subject to further developments. One of the methodological aspects calling for improvement is the selection of components to be considered in the assessment, currently based mainly on non-harmonized unstandardized experts’ judgment. Our aim was to develop a harmonized, transparent, and documented methodological framework for selecting nutritional, microbiological, and toxicological RBA components. The approach was developed under the Novel foods as red meat replacers—an insight using Risk-Benefit Assessment methods (NovRBA) case study, which attempted to estimate the overall health impact of replacing red meat with an edible insect species, Acheta domesticus. Starting from the compositional profiles of both food items, we created a “long list” of food components. By subsequently applying a series of predefined criteria, we proceeded from the “long” to the “short list.” These criteria were established based on the occurrence and severity of health outcomes related to these components. For nutrition and microbiology, the occurrence of health outcomes was evaluated considering the presence of a component in the raw material, as well as the effect of processing on the respective component. Regarding toxicology, the presence and exposure relative to reference doses and the contribution to total exposure were considered. Severity was graded with the potential contribution to the background diet alongside bioavailability aspects (nutrition), the disability-adjusted life years per case of illness of each hazard (microbiology), and disease incidence in the population, potential fatality, and lifelong disability (toxicology). To develop the “final list” of components, the “short list” was refined by considering the availability and quality of data for a feasible inclusion in the RBA model. The methodology developed can be broadly used in food RBA, to guide and reinforce a harmonized selection of nutritional, microbiological, and toxicological components and will contribute to facilitating RBA implementation, enabling the generation of transparent, robust, and comparable outcomes.

PDE concept for controlling cleaning agent residues in pharmaceuticals- A critical analysis

Cleaning agents (CAs) are used in multipurpose facilities to control carryover contamination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) to scientifically justified limits. While this is often done with the PDE methodology used for API impurities, it is unclear if it is justifiable and necessary for cleaning agents, which generally represent a comparatively lower health risk. Comparing calculated oral PDE values for CA ingredients (CAIs) from four companies with PDEs of a selected number of small-molecule APIs showed that the toxicity of CAIs is several orders of magnitude lower. Furthermore, a critical review of the toxicity and everyday exposure to the general population of the main CAIs functional groups showed that the expected health risks are generally negligible. This is particularly true if the associated mode of actions cause local toxicity that is usually irrelevant at the concentration of potential residue carryover. This work points towards alternative approaches to the PDE concept to control CAIs' contamination and provides some guidance on grouping and identifying compounds with lower health risks based on exposure and mode of action reasoning. In addition, this work supports the concept that limit values should only be set for CAIs of toxicological concern.

Risk-Benefit Assessment of Cereal-Based Foods Consumed by Portuguese Children Aged 6 to 36 Months-A Case Study under the RiskBenefit4EU Project

Cereal-based foods, including breakfast (BC) and infant cereals (IC), are among the first solid foods introduced to infants. BC and IC are sources of macro and micronutrients that have beneficial effects on health, but can also be sources of harmful chemical and microbiological contaminants and nutrients that may lead to adverse health effects at high consumption levels. This study was performed under the RiskBenefit4EU project with the aim of assessing the health impact associated with consumption of BC and IC by Portuguese children under 35 months. Adverse effects associated with the presence of aflatoxins, Bacillus cereus, sodium and free sugars were assessed against the benefits of fiber intake. We applied a risk–benefit assessment approach, and quantified the health impact of changes in consumption of BC and IC from current to various alternative consumption scenarios. Health impact was assessed in terms of disability-adjusted life years. Results showed that moving from the current consumption scenario to considered alternative scenarios results in a gain of healthy life years. Portuguese children can benefit from exchanging intake of IC to BC, if the BC consumed has an adequate nutritional profile in terms of fiber, sodium and free sugars, with levels of aflatoxins reduced as much as possible.

Food Safety Implications of Transitions Toward Sustainable Healthy Diets

Despite increased political attention, foodborne diseases still cause a substantial public health, economic, and social burden worldwide. Children younger than 5 years, people living in developing regions, and in the poorest areas of the world are disproportionally affected, bearing a large proportion of the global burden of foodborne disease. Yet, food safety is a prerequisite to ensuring food security globally: Foods that are responsible for important food safety problems are also crucial to ensure food security in some regions and are essential sources of nutrition. Moreover, together with calls for action to meeting international sustainable development goals, global efforts to promote food security and healthy diets have now highlighted the need to modify food systems globally. This article therefore explores the food safety dimensions of transitions toward food systems that promote sustainable healthy diets. The current body of evidence points to the combined health and environmental benefits of shifting toward a more plant-based diet, including vegetables and fruits, nuts, pulses, and whole grains. As a shift toward more plant-based diets may also lead to higher exposures to chemicals or pathogens present in these foods, an evaluation of food safety implications of such transitions is now imperative. We conclude that several synergies between public health, environmental, and food safety strategies can be identified to support dietary transitions.

Knowledge translation and health policy for burden of disease

A key goal of most Burden of Disease (BoD) studies is to support public health policies. However, while the concepts of BoD and Disability Adjusted Life years have been introduced more than 25 years, BoD researchers are still struggling to find better ways to translate their findings and communicate them to the relevant decision makers and other stakeholders.

To address this gap, the burden-eu COST Action aims to generate better guidance of the use of BoD metrics in policy-making processes. In collaboration with experts in knowledge translation and risk communication, the Action will compile good practices in knowledge translation and develop a roadmap to integrate knowledge translation in national BOD studies. To support these objectives, collaborations have been established with knowledge translation experts from the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the European Public Health Association.

During an initial meeting of the “knowledge translation” working group, 29 participants identified elements in the pathway from evidence generation to practice that need to be addressed. Building on the outcomes of this meeting and the inputs from the knowledge translation experts, this presentation will introduce the knowledge translation framework, and address some of the challenges in identifying best routes to reach out to the public and policy-makers. Specific emphasis will be placed in profiling the context, actors and processes of each country within the policy triangle, and drawing on best and worst example case studies. Additionally, the process will be discussed to co-create a toolkit or guide for using BoD evidence in policy and practice. The session will conclude with an interaction with the audience to learn about the perceived barriers for implementing knowledge translation within the BoD framework.

Health impact of substituting red meat by fish: addressing variability in risk-benefit assessments

Background

Sufficient intake of fish and limited red meat intake is commonly encouraged by national dietary guidelines to prevent various lifestyle diseases. One way to fulfill these guidelines would be to substitute red meat by fish. However, quantitative evidence of the public health gain of such substitution is lacking. Moreover, contaminants in these foods may compromise nutritional benefits. We aimed to estimate the health impact of substituting red meat by fish in the Danish diet in a risk-benefit assessment (RBA). Our study can support policy makers in defining evidence-based public health strategies.

Methods

We quantified the health impact of substituting red meat by fish among Danish adults in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) using data from a national dietary survey and food monitoring. We investigated the use of probabilistic methods to model variability in individual substitution behaviors and to assess health impact distributions in RBA of food.

Results

Health impact of the substitution varied largely by the type of fish consumed and by age and sex of the consumer. We estimated that 134 (95% uncertainty interval: 102; 169) DALYs/100,000 could be averted per year if a mix of lean and fatty fish is consumed in the Danish recommended amounts and intake of red meat decreased among Danish adults. The highest benefit was estimated for women in the childbearing age and for men above 50 years of age. However, a small fraction of women were assigned an overall health loss due to methylmercury exposure during pregnancy and the associated adverse effects in unborn children.

Conclusions

Our study estimated an overall health gain of substituting red meat by fish in the general Danish adult population, while providing insight in the variability in health impact at the level of individual consumers. Our approach can be applied in other RBAs and the results support the need for targeted public health strategies to ensure consumer health and safety.

Key messages

The health impact of substituting red meat by fish in Danish adults was quantified in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), while accounting for variability between individuals. We estimated that young women and men above 50 years of age will experience the largest health gain while a small fraction of the women were assigned a health loss due to chemical exposure.

Burden of disease of heavy metals in population clusters: towards targeted public health strategies

Background

Humans are exposed to heavy metals from certain foods, thus specific dietary patterns may lead to high burden of disease (BoD). By identifying diet, lifestyle and socio-demographic characteristics of population groups with highest BoD, targeted preventive strategies can be developed. We aimed at identifying clusters and characteristics of Danish individuals with highest BoD due to food exposure to three heavy metals: methylmercury (MeHg), cadmium and inorganic arsenic.

Methods

We collected diet, lifestyle and socio-demographic information of 3,946 individuals in the Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity. Occurrence of heavy metals in food was obtained from Danish food monitoring. We applied machine learning self-organizing maps to group individuals according to similarities in diet, lifestyle and socio-demographics, and estimated BoD due to metal exposure in terms of Disease-Adjusted Life Years (DALY). We will present calculation steps of our approach in a tutorial-like way and demonstrate its applicability to other cases.

Results

We identified 13 population subgroups with distinct dietary and lifestyle characteristics. The estimated BoD varied largely between subgroups, with five subgroups experiencing a BoD > 10 DALY/100,000. The cluster bearing the highest BoD (26.2 (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 10.3, 50.6) DALY/100,000) was significantly different from the cluster with the lowest BoD (5.1 (95% UI: 2.5, 9.2) DALY/100,000) (preliminary). BoD was higher in subgroups with diet and lifestyle considered healthy. Most of the BoD was due to MeHg, particularly in female-dominant subgroups.

Conclusions

Linking machine learning, exposure assessment and burden of disease metrics, this novel approach identified population subgroups with higher BoD due to exposure to three heavy metals. It can be expanded to estimate BoD of other chemicals, and used to develop targeted preventive strategies to reduce BoD in more affected subgroups.

Estimating the burden of disease of exposure to chemical contaminants in food in Denmark

Background

Recent global estimates have shown that dietary exposure to chemical contaminants cause over 56,000 deaths and 9 million healthy life years lost each year. However, the contribution of causative agents varies greatly between world regions and countries due to local food consumption and contamination. To prioritize public health interventions to reduce disease burden, national-level risk ranking evidence is needed. The overall aims of this project are to estimate the burden of disease (BoD) of selected chemical hazards in foods consumed in Denmark, and to identify the relative contribution of foods.

Methods

We identified chemicals on the basis of their presumed public health impact. The final list of chemicals was defined in agreement with the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, and included: methylmercury, inorganic arsenic, cadmium, acrylamide, dioxin/dioxin-like PCBs and lead. We estimated BoD in terms of disability adjusted life years (DALY) in a model combining exposure assessment with dose response models to derive probabilities of health effects, taking an incidence-based approach. Data were collected from the Danish National Survey of Diet and Physical Activity, food monitoring, literature, and national statistics.

Results

We estimated that methylmercury, inorganic arsenic, cadmium and acrylamide lead to a BoD of 514 DALY (95% uncertainty interval: 185, 990) in 2016 (preliminary results). Estimates for lead and dioxin/dioxin-like PCBs are pending. Methylmercury exposure from fish was the greatest contributor to overall burden (478 DALY), and acrylamide from potato products the second (30 DALY). The health outcomes leading to highest burden were intellectual disability and cancer.

Conclusions

Our estimates will assist public health managers identifying the chemical contaminants in foods with the highest impact on public health in Denmark. Future research should focus on estimating the effect of mitigation strategies on the disease burden.

Key messages

We provide national quantitative evidence of the health impact of chemical exposures from foods. Information on the relative contribution of foods and population groups affected may focus mitigation.

Risk Benefit Assessment of foods: Key findings from an international workshop

Whilst risk management measures, including food policy, are developed for the protection of public health and the environment, they may also lead to a reduction in health benefits. Policy decisions require then consideration of these necessary trade-offs, which leads to an increasing need to apply formal risk-benefit assessment (RBA) of foods. In this context, the European Food Safety Authority sponsored a Risk-Benefit Assessment Workshop on "past, current and future developments within the risk-benefit assessment of foods (RBA)" held in May 2017. The overall aims of the RBA Workshop were to discuss existing methods, challenges and needs within RBA, and to draft a roadmap for future development of RBA. The specific objectives were to i) identify RBA activities in Europe and globally; ii) discuss how to further develop and optimize RBA methodology; iii) identify challenges and opportunities within RBA; and iv) increase collaboration internationally. The two-day workshop gathered 28 participants from 16 institutions in 11 countries. It included technical presentations of RBA methods and case studies, and two break-out sessions for group discussions. All participants agreed that RBA has substantial potential to inform risk-management decisions in the areas of food safety, nutrition and public health. Several activities to optimize further developments within RBA were suggested. This paper provides a summary of workshop presentations, a discussion of challenges that limit progress in this area, and suggestions of next steps for this promising approach supporting a science-based decision process in the area of risk-benefit management of foods.