1
|
Funt SA, Cohen SL, Wang JJ, Sanelli PC, Barish MA. Abdominal pelvic CT findings compared between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients in the emergency department setting. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:1498-1505. [PMID: 33044654 PMCID: PMC7548525 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02796-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Manifestations of COVID-19 are primarily respiratory based, however, gastrointestinal symptoms are now recognized as an important component of the disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences in abdominal pelvic CT findings in the emergency department by COVID-19 test result. Methods This retrospective study identified patients tested by PCR for COVID-19 infection who underwent abdominal pelvic CT scan in the ED across an academic health system from March 15 to April 15, 2020. Radiology reports were reviewed for the presence of ground glass opacity in the lungs and acute abdominal pathology. A subset of patients with acute abdominal pathology were identified with inflammatory pathology in organs with high ACE2 receptor expression including bowel, pancreas, urinary bladder, and kidney. CT findings for COVID positive versus negative patients were compared with Chi-square test. Results 597 patients tested by PCR for COVID-19 infection underwent abdominal pelvic CT scan, 44% were COVID-19 positive. COVID-19 positive patients demonstrated significantly more ground glass opacity at the lung bases, 65.1%, (222/341) versus 12.4% (33/266), p < 0.001), and significantly less acute abdominal findings, 23.8% (81/341) versus 45.5% (121/266), p ≤ 0.001). When abdominal pathology was present, COVID-19 positive patients had higher rate of inflammatory pathology 58% (47/81) versus 29.8% (36/121). Conclusions In patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT from the ED, COVID-19 positive patients are more likely to have ground glass opacities at the lung bases and less likely to have acute abdominal pathology compared with COVID-19 negative patients. Further, COVID-19 positive patients are more likely to have inflammation of organs with high expression of ACE2 receptors than other types of acute abdominal pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey A Funt
- Department of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Stuart L Cohen
- Department of Radiology, Imaging Clinical Effectiveness and Outcomes Research (ICEOR), Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Center for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research (CHIOR), Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research and Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Jason J Wang
- Department of Radiology, Imaging Clinical Effectiveness and Outcomes Research (ICEOR), Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Center for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research (CHIOR), Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research and Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Pina C Sanelli
- Department of Radiology, Imaging Clinical Effectiveness and Outcomes Research (ICEOR), Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Center for Health Innovations and Outcomes Research (CHIOR), Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research and Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barrios DM, Phillips GS, Geisler AN, Trelles SR, Markova A, Noor SJ, Quigley EA, Haliasos HC, Moy AP, Schram AM, Bromberg J, Funt SA, Voss MH, Drilon A, Hellmann MD, Comen EA, Narala S, Patel AB, Wetzel M, Jung JY, Leung DYM, Lacouture ME. IgE blockade with omalizumab reduces pruritus related to immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-HER2 therapies. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:736-745. [PMID: 33667669 PMCID: PMC9282165 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Immunoglobulin E (IgE) blockade with omalizumab has demonstrated clinical benefit in pruritus-associated dermatoses (e.g. atopic dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid, urticaria). In oncology, pruritus-associated cutaneous adverse events (paCAEs) are frequent with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and targeted anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies. Thus, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IgE blockade with omalizumab in cancer patients with refractory paCAEs related to CPIs and anti-HER2 agents. Patients and methods: Patients included in this multicenter retrospective analysis received monthly subcutaneous injections of omalizumab for CPI or anti-HER2 therapy-related grade 2/3 pruritus that was refractory to topical corticosteroids plus at least one additional systemic intervention. To assess clinical response to omalizumab, we used the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The primary endpoint was defined as reduction in the severity of paCAEs to grade 1/0. Results: A total of 34 patients (50% female, median age 67.5 years) received omalizumab for cancer therapy-related paCAEs (71% CPIs; 29% anti-HER2). All had solid tumors (29% breast, 29% genitourinary, 15% lung, 26% other), and most (n = 18, 64%) presented with an urticarial phenotype. In total, 28 of 34 (82%) patients responded to omalizumab. The proportion of patients receiving oral corticosteroids as supportive treatment for management of paCAEs decreased with IgE blockade, from 50% to 9% (P < 0.001). Ten of 32 (31%) patients had interruption of oncologic therapy due to skin toxicity; four of six (67%) were successfully rechallenged following omalizumab. There were no reports of anaphylaxis or hypersensitivity reactions related to omalizumab. Conclusions: IgE blockade with omalizumab demonstrated clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in cancer patients with pruritus related to CPIs and anti-HER2 therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Barrios
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - G S Phillips
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A N Geisler
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - S R Trelles
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Markova
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - S J Noor
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - E A Quigley
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - H C Haliasos
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - A P Moy
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA; Dermatopathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A M Schram
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - J Bromberg
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - S A Funt
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - M H Voss
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - A Drilon
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - M D Hellmann
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - E A Comen
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - S Narala
- Department of Dermatology, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - A B Patel
- Department of Dermatology, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - M Wetzel
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA
| | - J Y Jung
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA; Dermatology Service, Department of Medical Oncology, Norton Cancer Institute, Louisville, USA
| | - D Y M Leung
- Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, USA
| | - M E Lacouture
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential role of preoperative CT in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preoperative CT examinations of 36 consecutive patients (age range, 30-75 years; mean age, 55 years) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients had recurrent ovarian cancer and secondary cytoreduction within a mean CT-surgery interval of 22 days (range, 2-69 days). The CT findings recorded were upper abdominal metastases (e.g., peritoneal carcinomatosis; perihepatic, perisplenic, gastrohepatic or gastrosplenic ligaments; gallbladder fossa; falciform ligament; lesser sac), lymphadenopathy (above or below the renal hilum), liver metastasis, large- and small-bowel obstruction, hydronephrosis, ascites, and the presence of a pelvic mass. CT findings and cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) levels were correlated with surgical resectability. RESULTS At surgery, tumors in 27 patients were optimally debulked (residual disease of <or= 1 cm) and in nine patients were nonresectable. Using multivariate analysis, hydronephrosis (odds ratio = 19.4, p = 0.03) and invasion of pelvic sidewall (odds ratio = 35.6, p = 0.006) were found to be most indicative of tumor nonresectability. The presence of small-bowel obstruction; nodal or perihepatic liver metastasis; ascites; peritoneal carcinomatosis; bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, or vaginal involvement; or infrarenal paraaortic adenopathy; and the level of CA-125 were not strong indicators of tumor nonresectability. CONCLUSION In patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma considered for secondary cytoreductive surgery, preoperative CT can be helpful in identifying the extent of the disease and can be used as an adjunct to treatment planning and management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey A Funt
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eberhardt SC, Choi PH, Bach AM, Funt SA, Felderman HE, Hann LE. Utility of sonography for small hepatic lesions found on computed tomography in patients with cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:335-346. [PMID: 12693617 DOI: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.4.335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of sonography in evaluating small indeterminate liver lesions detected on computed tomography in patients with cancer. METHODS Radiology database review from January 1, 1998, to August 4, 2000, identified 76 patients with 124 indeterminate hepatic lesions smaller than 1.5 cm on computed tomography who had abdominal sonography within 3 months. Sonographic reports and images were reviewed to assess whether lesions were referenced or specifically sought and to verify lesion correspondence, detection, and characterization. The validity of sonographic characterization was determined by histopathologic examination or follow-up imaging (mean time to follow up, 17 months; range, 6.5-38.8 months). RESULTS Sixty (48%) of 124 indeterminate lesions were evident on sonography. Detection improved when lesions were specifically sought and lesion size was greater than 0.5 cm. Forty (66%) of 61 lesions were detected when the radiologist referenced the preceding computed tomography versus 20 (32%) of 63 lesions when the computed tomographic findings were not referenced (P = .0004). Fifty-one (67%) of 76 lesions measuring 0.6 to 1.5 cm were detected on sonography versus 9 (19%) of 48 lesions measuring 0.1 to 0.5 cm. Lesion size (P < .0001) and body habitus (P = .02) were significant factors influencing lesion detection. Sonography characterized 56 (93%) of 60 detected lesions (33 cysts, 18 solid lesions/metastases, and 5 hemangiomas). Sonographic diagnoses were supported in 42 (93%) of 45 lesions by follow-up imaging (37 of 40) or histopathologic examination (5 of 5). CONCLUSIONS Sonography may be useful in cancer patients with average body habitus to characterize small (0.6- to 1.5-cm) indeterminate liver lesions detected on computed tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C Eberhardt
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York New York 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the appearance and prevalence of subcutaneous nodules in the anterior abdominal wall seen at CT in cancer patients receiving subcutaneous injections of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). METHODS CT examinations were reviewed in 426 patients receiving subcutaneous abdominal wall injections of LMWH for the presence of nodules. Nodules were evaluated for contour, maximal diameter, CT attenuation, and presence of hazy changes or air in the surrounding fat. RESULTS Fourteen (3%) of the 426 patients had nodules attributable to subcutaneous injections of LMWH. Findings included poorly defined borders (100%), adjacent hazy soft tissue changes (100%), adjacent air (57%), and a mean CT attenuation of -4.4 HU (range: -50-40 HU). Three (0.7%) of 426 patients had nodules caused by metastatic disease. One (33%) nodule had poorly defined borders, two (67%) had surrounding hazy changes, one (33%) had air in adjacent tissue, and there was a mean CT attenuation of 44 HU (range: 14-140 HU). One (0.2%) patient had a subcutaneous nodule of uncertain etiology. CONCLUSION Patients receiving subcutaneous injections of LMWH may develop nodules at the injection sites. Such nodules can resemble metastatic tumor deposits at CT, and careful correlation with clinical history and growth trends of metastatic deposits elsewhere in the patient is needed to avoid misdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey A Funt
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Hospital Vall d'Hebron and Centro Medico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|