Increased Complication Rates with Proton Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Immediate, Implant-Based Reconstruction: Single-Institution Comparative Effectiveness Analysis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To compare the impact of protons vs. photons on breast reconstruction complications, for patients (pts) receiving postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) with either single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) or two-staged expander/implant (TE/I).

MATERIALS/METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 578 pts who underwent immediate reconstruction followed by radiation at our institution between 2010 and 2020. Pts with implant-based reconstruction using either TE/I or DTI and PMRT delivery in the presence of the prosthesis were included. Pts enrolled in active ongoing clinical trials were excluded from the analysis. The photon group received 3D conformal or IMRT/VMAT treatment with a median dose of 50-50.4 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions. For proton pts, treatment was delivered mainly with pencil beam scanning technique (PBS); few pts received passively scattered proton spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). The complications were defined as infection/skin necrosis (I/N) requiring operative debridement, capsular contracture (CC) necessitating capsulotomy, and overall implant failure (ORF) as the removal of the permanent implant irrespective of replacement outcomes (i.e., with and without salvage reconstruction). We fit inverse-probability weighted cumulative incidence curves to adjust for confounding and non-random loss to follow-up. Various sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-five pts were available for the final analysis with an overall median follow-up of 55 months. 66 (13%) received protons, of which14 were treated with SOBP protons. 137 (28%) and 256 (56%) received photons with and without chest wall boost (CWB), respectively. The 5-year inverse probability-weighted risk of CC post-PMRT was 31% for protons vs. 10% for photons (RR:3.09, 95% CI: 1.77, 5.40). The 5 years ORF risk was 35.6% in protons compared to 22.7% in photons pts (RR: 1.57; 95% CI 1.0, 2.48). Hazard ratios from the adjusted Cox models were 3.79 (p<0.001) for CC and 2.05 (p<0.01) for ORF. No difference in I/N was noted between protons and photons pts. Sensitivity analysis showed that protons significantly increased CC risk vs photons both with CWB (HR:3.56, P<0.001) and without CWB (HR:3.9, p<0.001). Similar outcomes were observed with ORF, where protons increased the rate of ORF compared to photons, irrespective of CWB (HR 1.8, p = 0.038 with CWB; HR 2.4, p = 0.004 without CWB). No differences between PBS and SOBP proton techniques were noted.

CONCLUSION

Compared to photons, proton therapy increases the risk of capsular contracture requiring surgical intervention and hence overall reconstruction failure. This data should inform discussions about the risks and benefits of protons in patients with reconstruction, while awaiting mature data from ongoing clinical trials (RADCOMP) utilizing protons for breast cancer.

Cohort profile: the ESC EURObservational Research Programme Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction (NSTEMI) Registry

AIMS

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) Registry aims to identify international patterns in NSTEMI management in clinical practice and outcomes against the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without ST-segment-elevation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutively hospitalised adult NSTEMI patients (n = 3620) were enrolled between 11 March 2019 and 6 March 2021, and individual patient data prospectively collected at 287 centres in 59 participating countries during a two-week enrolment period per centre. The registry collected data relating to baseline characteristics, major outcomes (in-hospital death, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, bleeding, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and 30-day mortality) and guideline-recommended NSTEMI care interventions: electrocardiogram pre- or in-hospital, pre-hospitalization receipt of aspirin, echocardiography, coronary angiography, referral to cardiac rehabilitation, smoking cessation advice, dietary advice, and prescription on discharge of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibition, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker, and statin.

CONCLUSION

The EORP NSTEMI Registry is an international, prospective registry of care and outcomes of patients treated for NSTEMI, which will provide unique insights into the contemporary management of hospitalised NSTEMI patients, compliance with ESC 2015 NSTEMI Guidelines, and identify potential barriers to optimal management of this common clinical presentation associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Learning curve and proficiency metrics for transcarotid artery revascularization

BACKGROUND

When introduced to a new procedure, physicians improve their performance and reduce their procedural adverse event rates rapidly during the initial cases and then improvement slows, signaling that proficiency has been achieved. Determining when they have acquired proficiency has important implications for procedural innovation, education, credentialing, and patient safety. We analyzed the worldwide experience with transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), a hybrid approach to carotid revascularization, to identify the (1) procedural performance measures associated with clinical and technical adverse events; (2) target levels of performance measures that minimize adverse event rates; and (3) number of TCAR cases needed to achieve the target levels for the performance measures.

METHODS

The patient, lesion, and physician characteristics were collected for each TCAR procedure performed by each physician worldwide in an international quality assurance database. Four procedural performance measures were recorded for each procedure: flow-reversal time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and total skin-to-skin time. Composite clinical adverse events (ie, transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction, death) and composite technical adverse events (ie, aborted procedure, conversion to surgery, bleeding, dissection, cranial nerve injury, device failure), occurring within 24 hours were also recorded. Correlations between each performance measure and the clinical and technical adverse event rates were computed. The inflection points in the performance measures were identified at which no further improvements occurred in the adverse event rates. Finally, the minimum number of TCAR cases required to achieve the target performance measure levels was computed.

RESULTS

A total of 18,240 procedures performed by 1273 physicians were analyzed. Of the 18,240 patients, 34.9% were women and 62.5% were asymptomatic. The flow-reversal time correlated with clinical adverse events adjusted for age, sex, and symptomatic status (R2 = 0.91; P < .0001) and adjusted technical adverse events (R2 = 0.86; P < .0001). The skin-to-skin time correlated with adjusted technical adverse events (R2 = 0.92; P < .0001). A reduction in flow-reversal times to <13.1 minutes and the skin-to-skin time to <81 minutes did not translate into further improvements in the adverse event rates. A minimum of 26 TCAR cases was required to achieve the target flow-reversal time, and a minimum of 15 cases was required to achieve the target skin-to-skin time.

CONCLUSIONS

The flow-reversal time and skin-to-skin time are appropriate performance measures for establishing the level of expertise of physicians as they acquire skills to perform TCAR. A target time of ≤13.1 minutes for flow-reversal and 81 minutes for skin-to-skin time minimized the adverse event rates. Familiarity with the steps involved in performing TCAR was achieved after ≥15 cases, and minimizing clinical adverse events occurred after ≥26 cases.

Transcarotid revascularization outcomes do not differ by patient age or sex

BACKGROUND

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a hybrid approach to carotid revascularization. Limited information is available on the differences in periprocedural complications and performance measures of TCAR for men compared with women and for older vs younger adults.

METHODS

The patient, lesion, and physician characteristics were collected for all TCAR procedures performed by each physician worldwide in an international quality assurance database between March 3, 2009 and May 7, 2020. Clinical composite (ie, death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction) and technical composite (ie, aborted procedure, conversion to surgery, bleeding, dissection, cranial nerve injury, device failure) adverse events within 24 hours of the procedure were recorded. Four performance measures were recorded: flow-reversal time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and skin-to-skin time. Poisson regressions were used to assess the effects of age and sex on the incidence of clinical and technical composite adverse events. Linear regressions were used to compare the four performance measures.

RESULTS

A total of 18,240 TCARs were performed by 1273 physicians; 34.9% of the patients were women and 37.5% were symptomatic. The overall incidence of clinical and technical composite adverse events was low. The adjusted clinical (1.62% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17%-2.23%] vs 1.35% [95% CI, 1.01%-1.79%]; P = .22) and technical (7.84% [95% CI, 6.85%-8.97%] vs 7.80% [95% CI, 6.94%-8.77%]; P = .93) composite adverse event rates did not vary for women vs men. The adjusted clinical (P = .65) and technical (P = .55) composite adverse event rates also did not vary by age. The adjusted skin-to-skin time was shorter for the women (76.6 minutes; 95% CI, 74.6-78.6) than for the men (77.7 minutes; 95% CI, 75.7-79.6; P = .002). Significant differences were found by age group for fluoroscopy time, flow-reversal time, and skin-to-skin time, although the magnitude of these differences was small (<1 minute for each).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and technical outcomes of TCAR are not affected by age or sex. We found clinically minor differences in the procedural performance measures when stratified by age and sex. In addition to being safe for younger individuals, TCAR could also be the preferred method for performing carotid stenting in women and older patients, in particular, older women.

Risk Factors for and Intraoperative Management of Intolerance to Flow Reversal in TCAR

BACKGROUND

In patients deemed high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) who are indicated for treatment of carotid artery stenosis (CAS), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has been demonstrated as a safe and effective alternative to trans-femoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). Compared to CEA, where approx. 12% of patients undergoing awake intervention do not tolerate internal carotid artery (ICA) clamping, only 1-2% of patients were observed to have intolerance to flow reversal during TCAR based on data from the ROADSTER1/2 trials. This study reviewed awake interventions from those trials to assess factors associated with intolerance to flow reversal and review how those cases were managed.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from Reverse Flow Used During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure (ROADSTER) multicenter trial along with the subsequent post-approval (ROADSTER-2) trial. The subset of patients from both trials undergoing awake TCAR was analyzed to compare demographics, procedural details, and anatomic factors between patients who did and did not experience intolerance to reversal of flow to assess for predisposing factors. Patients were deemed intolerant to flow reversal at the discretion of the operator, often related to changes in completion of neurologic tasks, hemodynamic stability, or patient reported symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients from ROADSTER and 194 patients from ROADSTER-2 underwent TCAR under local/regional anesthesia. Of these, 8 patients had intolerance to flow reversal, though all cases were successfully completed. While intraoperative hemodynamic data was only available for 5 of the 8 intolerant patients, none experienced hypotension. 4 cases were completed under low flow reversal, 3 cases were successfully weaned from low to high flow over several minutes, and 1 case required general anesthesia. No significant association was found between intolerance to flow reversal and comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), congestive heart failure (CHF), prior MI or angina, pre-op CAS-related symptoms, prior stroke, prior CAS or CEA, prior neck radiation, tandem stenosis, high cervical stenosis, or hostile neck. A trend towards significance was seen with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and contralateral carotid artery occlusion (P = 0.086 and 0.139, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite intolerance to flow reversal, TCAR cases were successfully completed by adjusting reversal-of-flow rate and do not typically require conversion to GETA. While factors contributing to intolerance of flow reversal during TCAR remain poorly understood, this study identified a trend towards significance with an association of preexisting COPD and contralateral carotid artery occlusion. Given the low number of patients who experienced this issue, a larger sample size is required to better elucidate these trends.

163 Morbidity of Presumed Temporary Loop De-Functioning Stomas in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Objectives

The incidence of parastomal hernia (PSH) can be up to 80% of patients who have a stoma following abdominal surgery (1). Surgical intervention is required in 70% of patients due to pain, obstructive symptoms, or stoma appliance issues (2). This study aims to show the morbidity related to a presumed temporary loop stoma.

Method

This was a retrospective cohort study of all left-sided colorectal cancer resections undertaken in a single centre. Electronic healthcare records and Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) were used to gather data on patient demographics, operative details and details of de-functioning stoma fashioned. Morbidity related to de-functioning stoma was determined based on hospital admissions and length of inpatient stay related to stoma, complications in relation to the stoma, return to theatre, stoma reversal and fate of stoma site.

Results

147 patients (87 M; 60 F, median age 69 (23-93)) underwent left sided colorectal cancer resections at a single centre. In total, 50 de-functioning loop stomas were fashioned (49 loop ileostomies and 1 loop colostomy.) At a median follow-up of 23 months (8-44), prior to reversal, 12 PSH were identified. 38 of the de-functioning stomas were reversed at a median time of 11 months (1-44), 5 of which were emergency procedures due to obstruction (n = 3) or high output (n = 2). There were 9 stoma related re-admissions identified in 7 patients.

Conclusions

Presumed temporary defunctioning loop ileostomies in Low anterior resections is associated with significant morbidity, but low risk in terms of life-threatening complication.

Low-frequency avoidable errors during transcarotid artery revascularization

OBJECTIVE

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) seems to be a safe and effective alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS). The TCAR system represents a paradigm shift in the management of carotid artery stenosis with potential for a significant decrease in periprocedural morbidity. However, as with CEA or TF-CAS, TCAR is associated with infrequent complications related to user technical error, most of which are preventable. Our goal is to describe these low-frequency events, and to provide guidelines for avoiding them.

METHODS

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that all medical device manufacturers create a system for receiving, reviewing, and evaluating complaints (Code 21 of Federal Regulations 820.198). Silk Road Medical, Inc (Sunnyvale, Calif), has established a process by which all feedback, including complaints that may not meet FDA criteria, is captured and stored in a database for detailed analysis. More than 13,300 cases have been performed; submitted complaints were reviewed for incidents of serious injury and periprocedural complications, above and beyond the device-related events that must be reported to the FDA.

RESULTS

A total of 13,334 patients have undergone TCAR worldwide between early 2011 and December 2019 using the SilkRoad device. Reported complications included 173 dissections (1.4% overall rate) of the common carotid artery at the access point, of which 22.5% were managed without intervention or with medical therapy alone and 24.3% were converted to CEA (considered failing safely). Errors in the location of stent deployment occurred in 16 cases (0.13%), with the most common site being the external carotid artery (75%). One wrong side carotid artery stent was placed in a patient with a high midline pattern of the bovine arch. Cranial nerve injury was reported in 11 cases (0.08%), only one of which persisted beyond 3 months. There have been three reported pneumothoraces and one reported chylothorax. Many of these errors can be recognized and prevented with careful attention to detail.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients requiring treatment for carotid artery stenosis, TCAR has been proven as an alternative to TF-CAS with an excellent safety profile. As with CEA or TF-CAS, this procedure has the potential for infrequent complications, often as a result of user technical error. Although significant, these events can be avoided through a review of the collective experience to date and recognition of potential pitfalls, as we have described.

Bioelectric impedance vector analysis (BIVA) in hospitalised children; predictors and associations with clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Clinical use of bioelectric impedance is limited by variability in hydration. Analysis of raw bioelectric impedance vectors (BIVA), resistance (R), reactance (Xc) and phase angle (PA) may be an alternative for monitoring disease progression/treatment. Clinical experience of BIVA in children is limited. We investigated predictors of BIVA and their ability to predict clinical outcomes in children with complex diagnoses.

METHODS

R, Xc and PA were measured (BODYSTAT Quadscan 4000) on admission in 108 patients (4.6-16.8 years, mean 10.0). R and Xc were indexed by height (H) and BIVA-SDS for age and sex calculated using data from healthy children. Potential predictors and clinical outcomes (greater-than-expected length-of-stay (LOS), complications) were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean R/H-SDS was significantly higher (0.99 (SD 1.32)) and PA-SDS lower (-1.22 (1.68))) than expected, with a wide range for all parameters. In multivariate models, the Strongkids risk category predicted R/H-SDS (adjusted mean for low, medium and high risk = 0.49, 1.28, 2.17, p = 0.009) and PA-SDS (adjusted mean -0.52, -1.53, -2.36, p = 0.01). BIVA-SDS were not significantly different in patients with or without adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

These complex patients had abnormal mean BIVA-SDS suggestive of reduced hydration and poor cellular health according to conventional interpretation. R/H-SDS was higher and PA-SDS lower in those classified as higher malnutrition risk by the StrongKids tool. Further investigation in specific patient groups, including those with acute fluid shifts and using disease-specific outcomes, may better define the clinical role of BIV.

Embedding routine health checks for adults with intellectual disabilities in primary care: practice nurse perceptions

BACKGROUND

Adults with intellectual disabilities (IDs) have consistently poorer health outcomes than the general population. There is evidence that routine health checks in primary care may improve outcomes. We conducted a randomised controlled trial of practice nurse led health checks. Here, we report findings from the nested qualitative study.

AIM

To explore practice nurse perceptions and experience of delivering an anticipatory health check for adults with IDs.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study in General Practices located in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, UK.

METHOD

Eleven practice nurses from 11 intervention practices participated in a semi-structured interview. Analysis was guided by a framework approach.

RESULTS

Practice nurses reported initially feeling 'swamped' and 'baffled' by the prospect of the intervention, but early misgivings were not realised. Health checks were incorporated into daily routines with relative ease, but this was largely contingent on existing patient engagement. The intervention was thought most successful with patients already well known to the practice. Chronic disease management models are commonly used by practice nurses and participants tailored health checks to existing practice. It emerged that few of the nurses utilised the breadth of the check instead modifying the check to respond to individual patients' needs. As such, already recognised 'problems' or issues dominated the health check process. Engaging with the health checks in this way appeared to increase the acceptability and feasibility of the check for nurses. There was universal support for the health check ethos, although some questioned whether all adults with IDs would access the health checks, and as a consequence, the long-term benefits of checks.

CONCLUSION

While the trial found the intervention to be dominant over standard health care, the adjustments nurses made may not have maximised potential benefits to patients. Increasing training could further improve the benefits that health checks provide for people with IDs.

Vascular Anatomy Predicts the Risk of Cerebral Ischemia in Patients Randomized to Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Complex vascular anatomy might increase the risk of procedural stroke during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Randomized controlled trial evidence that vascular anatomy should inform the choice between CAS and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been lacking.

METHODS

One-hundred eighty-four patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis who were randomly assigned to CAS or CEA in the ICSS (International Carotid Stenting Study) underwent magnetic resonance (n=126) or computed tomographic angiography (n=58) at baseline and brain magnetic resonance imaging before and after treatment. We investigated the association between aortic arch configuration, angles of supra-aortic arteries, degree, length of stenosis, and plaque ulceration with the presence of ≥1 new ischemic brain lesion on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI+) after treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-nine of 97 patients in the CAS group (51%) and 14 of 87 in the CEA group (16%) were DWI+ (odds ratio [OR], 6.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-12.4; P<0.001). In the CAS group, aortic arch configuration type 2/3 (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-7.1; P=0.027) and the degree of the largest internal carotid artery angle (≥60° versus <60°; OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.7-10.1; P=0.002) were both associated with DWI+, also after correction for age. No predictors for DWI+ were identified in the CEA group. The DWI+ risk in CAS increased further over CEA if the largest internal carotid artery angle was ≥60° (OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 4.1-34.1) than if it was <60° (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8; interaction P=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Complex configuration of the aortic arch and internal carotid artery tortuosity increase the risk of cerebral ischemia during CAS, but not during CEA. Vascular anatomy should be taken into account when selecting patients for stenting.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN25337470. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470.

Evaluating the role of simulation in healthcare innovation: recommendations of the Simnovate Medical Technologies Domain Group

Background

Innovation in healthcare is the practical application of new concepts, ideas, processes or technologies into clinical practice. Despite its necessity and potential to improve care in measurable ways, there are several issues related to patient safety, high costs, high failure rates and limited adoption by end-users. This mixed-method study aims to explore the role of simulation as a potential testbed for diminishing the risks, pitfalls and resources associated with development and implementation of medical innovations.

Methods

Subject-matter experts consisting of physicians, engineers, scientists and industry leaders participated in four semistructured teleconferences each lasting up to 2 hours each. Verbal data were transcribed verbatim, coded and categorised according to themes using grounded theory, and subsequently synthesised into a conceptual framework. Panelists were then invited to complete an online survey, ranking the (1) current use and (2) potential effectiveness of simulation-based technologies and techniques for evaluating and facilitating the product life cycle pathway. This was performed for each theme of the previously generated conceptual framework using a Likert scale of 1 (no effectiveness) to 9 (highest possible effectiveness) and then segregated according to various forms of simulation.

Results

Over 100 hours of data were collected and analysed. After 7 rounds of inductive data analysis, a conceptual framework of the product life cycle was developed. This framework helped to define and characterise the product development pathway. Agreement between reviewers for inclusion of items after the final round of analysis was 100%. A total of 7 themes were synthesised and categorised into 3 phases of the pathway: ‘design and development’, ‘implementation and value creation’ and ‘product launch’. Strong discrepancies were identified between the current and potential roles of simulation in each phase. Simulation was felt to have the strongest potential role for early prototyping, testing for safety and product quality and testing for product effectiveness and ergonomics.

Conclusions

Simulation has great potential to fulfil several unmet needs in healthcare innovation. This framework can be used to help guide innovators and channel resources appropriately. The ultimate goal is a structured, well-defined process that will result in a product development outcome that has the greatest potential to succeed.

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal

Purpose: To report a study evaluating the safety and efficacy of stenting via direct carotid access with flow reversal using the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System. Methods: Between March 2009 and June 2012, 75 patients (mean age 72.6 years; 45 men) underwent carotid artery stenting with the ENROUTE System; the majority of patients (63, 84%) were asymptomatic. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of major stroke, myocardial infarction, or death at 30 days. Efficacy outcomes included acute device success, procedure success, and tolerance to flow reversal. Fifty-six (74.7%) patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) before and after the procedure to assess the development of new ischemic brain lesions. Results: Acute device and procedure success were achieved in 68 (90.6%) patients. The reverse flow circuit was established in 71 (94.6%) patients; only 5 patients demonstrated transient intolerance to flow reversal that did not interfere with completion of the procedure. The mean time on flow reversal was 19.1 minutes. In the DW-MRI substudy, 10 (17.9%) of 56 patients had ipsilateral new white lesions with a mean volume of 0.17 mL. At 30 days, no major stroke, myocardial infarction, or death occurred; 1 patient had experienced a minor stroke that was adjudicated as not related to either the device or procedure. Conclusion: Results of the PROOF study demonstrate the safety and efficacy of transcarotid revascularization with the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System.

Brain Injury Secondary to Carotid Intervention

Causes of brain injury during endovascular carotid intervention are protean. Mechanisms of injury include embolic and hemodynamic events, acute carotid occlusions occurring through a variety of means, and the relatively rare contrast-induced encephalopathy.

Embolic injury may result from micro- and macroembolization and most commonly causes ischemic stroke when sufficiently severe. Hemodynamic injury may proceed from hemodynamic depression and hypoperfusion (which may result in watershed infarction) or the hyperperfusion syndrome, which may, if severe, result in hemorrhagic stroke.

Embolic and dynamic causes of stroke may either occur intraprocedurally or at a variable time after stent placement and may be co-related. Impaired clearance of emboli due to relative hypoperfusion may exacerbate their clinical relevance. Other causes of stroke include acute carotid occlusions, which most commonly occur procedurally due to flow-limiting spasm, acute dissection, and, if a filter-type cerebral protection device has been used, filter occlusion due to a large trapped embolic load. These scenarios may result in stroke if not recognized and dealt with appropriately. Acute stent thrombosis may occur within 24 hours of the procedure as a result of adverse hemodynamic factors or suboptimal patient response to procedural heparin and antiplatelet agents, or it may occur after the procedure, again perhaps as a result of suboptimal response to antiaggregate drugs.

Common Iliac Artery Access during Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Repair Facilitated by a Transabdominal Wall Tunnel

Purpose:

To describe a technique for common iliac artery (CIA) access during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair when unfavorable angulation between the CIA and the delivery sheath precludes direct arterial access.

Technique:

After retroperitoneal exposure of the CIA, a puncture site is chosen inferolateral to the surgical incision, and an 18-G trocar/cannula is advanced in alignment with the CIA through the anterior abdominal wall or skin of the upper thigh into the retroperitoneal space. Serial dilatation is performed over a guidewire placed through the cannula to create the subcutaneous tract. The trocar/cannula is replaced over the wire, and the CIA is punctured under direct vision. The guidewire is then advanced into the proximal aorta. A CIA arteriotomy is performed and the delivery system introduced over the guidewire through the tunnel into the iliac artery.

Conclusions:

Retroperitoneal exposure of the CIA with tunneled transabdominal wall delivery of the stent-graft avoids both external iliac artery injury and creation of a temporary access conduit in patients with iliac tortuosity and/or occlusive disease.

Multicenter Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Assisted Closure after Antegrade Arterial Punctures Using the StarClose Device

Purpose:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the StarClose device for closure of antegrade punctures following infrainguinal endovascular interventions.

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted of 221 consecutive patients treated with the StarClose device in a 12-month period at 5 centers (4 French and 1 British). Of these, 107 patients (69 men; median age 75 years, range 44–93) were from the UK cohort (111 closures), and 94 patients (75 men; median age 67 years, range 32–95) were from the French cohort (111 closures). Technical success, complication rates, demographic data, medical history, and procedural details were gathered for all patients. Residual bleeding and the requirement for additional manual compression were recorded when the device failed. Clinical evaluation was performed at discharge; color-coded duplex ultrasonography was done in a subset of French patients.

Results:

The overall technical success rate was 94.6% (210/222; 95% CI 3.1%–9.2%). The results were similar in the 2 cohorts: 95.5% (106/111; 95% CI 1.9%–10.1%) in the UK and 93.7% (104/111; 95% CI 3.1%–12.4%) in France. The 12 failures (5 UK and 7 France) were due to several mechanisms: device failure (n=5), obesity (n=1), groin scarring (n=2), and unexplained (n=4). In 2 failed cases, open surgical closure of the arteriotomy was performed because pressure hemostasis failed. Two pseudoaneurysms were observed: one after immediate failure was successfully treated by prolonged pressure; the other, after apparent success of the device, required surgical therapy. The incidence of serious vascular complication was 1.8% (4/222; 95% CI 0.7%–4.5%); 2 patients from each cohort.

Conclusion:

The StarClose device safely and effectively closes antegrade punctures after infrainguinal endovascular intervention, even in patients who would be considered to be at high risk for puncture-site bleeding. However, a randomized trial would be required to support any definitive recommendations.

Predictors of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death within 30 Days of Carotid Artery Stenting: Results from the International Carotid Stenting Study

OBJECTIVES

Stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death are complications of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The effect of baseline patient demographic factors, processes of care, and technical factors during CAS on the risk of stroke, MI, or death within 30 days of CAS in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) were investigated.

METHODS

In ICSS, suitable patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis > 50% were randomly allocated to CAS or endarterectomy. Factors influencing the risk of stroke, MI, or death within 30 days of CAS were examined in a regression model for the 828 patients randomized to CAS in whom the procedure was initiated.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 7.4% suffered stroke, MI, or death within 30 days of CAS. Independent predictors of risk were age (risk ratio [RR] 1.17 per 5 years of age, 95% CI 1.01-1.37), a right-sided procedure (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.91), aspirin and clopidogrel in combination prior to CAS (compared with any other antiplatelet regimen, RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.98), smoking status, and the severity of index event. In patients in whom a stent was deployed, use of an open-cell stent conferred higher risk than use of a closed-cell stent (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.11-3.33). Cerebral protection device (CPD) use did not modify the risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of patients for CAS should take into account symptoms, age, and side of the procedure. The results favour the use of closed-cell stents. CPDs in ICSS did not protect against stroke.

Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal

OBJECTIVE

This report presents the 30-day results of the Safety and Efficacy Study for Reverse Flow Used During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure (ROADSTER) multicenter trial and evaluates the safety and efficacy of ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS (Silk Road Medical Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif), a novel transcarotid neuroprotection system that provides direct surgical common carotid access and cerebral embolic protection via high-rate flow reversal during carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

A prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial was performed to evaluate the use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS during CAS procedures performed in patients considered to be at high risk for complications from carotid endarterectomy. Symptomatic patients with ≥50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis were eligible to be treated with any U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved carotid artery stent. The primary end point was the composite of all stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death at 30 days postprocedure as defined in the Food and Drug Administration-approved study protocol. Secondary end points included cranial nerve injury; 30-day stroke, death, stroke/death, and MI; acute device, technical, and procedural success; and access site complications. All major adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee.

RESULTS

Between November 2012 and July 2014, 208 patients were enrolled at 18 sites. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled as lead-in cases, and 141 were enrolled in the pivotal phase. In the pivotal cohort, 26% were symptomatic and 75% were asymptomatic. Acute device and technical success were 99% (140 of 141). By hierarchical analysis, the all-stroke rate in the pivotal group was 1.4% (2 of 141), stroke and death was 2.8% (4 of 141), and stroke, death and MI was 3.5% (5 of 141). One patient (0.7%) experienced postoperative hoarseness from potential Xth cranial nerve injury, which completely resolved at the 6-month follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the ROADSTER trial demonstrate that the use of the ENROUTE Transcarotid NPS is safe and effective at preventing stroke during CAS. The overall stroke rate of 1.4% is the lowest reported to date for any prospective, multicenter clinical trial of CAS.

Economic evaluation of occupational health and safety programmes in health care

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based resource allocation in the public health care sector requires reliable economic evaluations that are different from those needed in the commercial sector.

AIMS

To describe a framework for conducting economic evaluations of occupational health and safety (OHS) programmes in health care developed with sector stakeholders. To define key resources and outcomes to be considered in economic evaluations of OHS programmes and to integrate these into a comprehensive framework.

METHODS

Participatory action research supported by mixed qualitative and quantitative methods, including a multi-stakeholder working group, 25 key informant interviews, a 41-member Delphi panel and structured nominal group discussions.

RESULTS

We found three resources had top priority: OHS staff time, training the workers and programme planning, promotion and evaluation. Similarly, five outcomes had top priority: number of injuries, safety climate, job satisfaction, quality of care and work days lost. The resulting framework was built around seven principles of good practice that stakeholders can use to assist them in conducting economic evaluations of OHS programmes.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a framework resulting from this participatory action research approach may increase the quality of economic evaluations of OHS programmes and facilitate programme comparisons for evidence-based resource allocation decisions. The principles may be applicable to other service sectors funded from general taxes and more broadly to economic evaluations of OHS programmes in general.

Ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting increase future cerebrovascular risk

Background

Brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are frequently found after carotid artery stenting (CAS), but their clinical relevance remains unclear.

Objectives

This study sought to investigate whether periprocedural ischemic DWI lesions after CAS or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are associated with an increased risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events.

Methods

In the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) substudy of ICSS (International Carotid Stenting Study), 231 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomized to undergo CAS (n = 124) or CEA (n = 107). MRIs were performed 1 to 7 days before and 1 to 3 days after treatment. The primary outcome event was stroke or transient ischemic attack in any territory occurring between the post-treatment MRI and the end of follow-up. Time to occurrence of the primary outcome event was compared between patients with (DWI+) and without (DWI–) new DWI lesions on the post-treatment scan in the CAS and CEA groups separately.

Results

Median time of follow-up was 4.1 years (interquartile range: 3.0 to 5.2). In the CAS group, recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack occurred more often among DWI+ patients (12 of 62) than among DWI– patients (6 of 62), with a cumulative 5-year incidence of 22.8% (standard error [SE]: 7.1%) and 8.8% (SE: 3.8%), respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio: 2.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 7.72; p = 0.04). In DWI+ and DWI– patients, 8 and 2 events, respectively, occurred within 6 months after treatment. In the CEA group, there was no difference in recurrent cerebrovascular events between DWI+ and DWI– patients.

Conclusions

Ischemic brain lesions discovered on DWI after CAS seem to be a marker of increased risk for recurrent cerebrovascular events. Patients with periprocedural DWI lesions might benefit from more aggressive and prolonged antiplatelet therapy after CAS. (A Randomised Comparison of the Risks, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness of Primary Carotid Stenting With Carotid Endarterectomy: International Carotid Stenting Study; ISRCTN25337470)

Carotid artery stenting: an update

In patients with carotid disease, the purpose of carotid artery revascularization is stroke prevention. For >50 years, carotid endarterectomy has been considered the standard treatment for severe asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenoses. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged in the last 15 years as minimally invasive alternative to surgery. However, the value of the endovascular approach in the management of carotid disease patients remains highly controversial. The aims of this review are to elucidate the current role of CAS, to describe the major technology advancements in the field, and to speculate about the future of this therapy.

Geographic and socioeconomic variations in adolescent toothbrushing: a multilevel cross-sectional study of 15 year olds in Scotland

BACKGROUND

This study examined urban-rural and socioeconomic differences in adolescent toothbrushing.

METHODS

The data were modelled using logistic multilevel modelling and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method of estimation. Twice-a-day toothbrushing was regressed upon age, family affluence, family structure, school type, area-level deprivation and rurality, for boys and girls separately.

RESULTS

Boys' toothbrushing was associated with area-level deprivation but not rurality. Variance at the school level remained significant in the final model for boys' toothbrushing. The association between toothbrushing and area-level deprivation was particularly strong for girls, after adjustment for individuals' family affluence and type of school attended. Rurality too was independently significant with lower odds of brushing teeth in accessible rural areas.

CONCLUSION

The findings are at odds with the results of a previous study which showed lower caries prevalence among children living in rural Scotland. A further study concluded that adolescents have a better diet in rural Scotland. In total, these studies highlight the need for an examination into the relative importance of diet and oral health on caries, as increases are observed in population obesity and consumption of sugars.

Predictors of acute and persisting ischemic brain lesions in patients randomized to carotid stenting or endarterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We investigated predictors for acute and persisting periprocedural ischemic brain lesions among patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to stenting or endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study.

METHODS

We assessed acute lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging 1 to 3 days after treatment in 124 stenting and 107 endarterectomy patients and lesions persisting on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery after 1 month in 86 and 75 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Stenting patients had more acute (relative risk, 8.8; 95% confidence interval, 4.4-17.5; P<0.001) and persisting lesions (relative risk, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-11.1; P=0.005) than endarterectomy patients. Acute lesion count was associated with age (by trend), male sex, and stroke as the qualifying event in stenting; high systolic blood pressure in endarterectomy; and white matter disease in both groups. The rate of conversion from acute to persisting lesions was lower in the stenting group (relative risk, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.8; P=0.007), and was only predicted by acute lesion volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting caused more acute and persisting ischemic brain lesions than endarterectomy. However, the rate of conversion from acute to persisting lesions was lower in the stenting group, most likely attributable to lower acute lesion volumes. Clinical Trial Registration -URL: www.isrctn.org. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470.

Assessment of reverse flow as a means of cerebral protection during carotid artery stent placement with diffusion-weighted and transcranial Doppler imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of flow reversal as an alternative means of cerebral protection by using transcranial Doppler recordings and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as surrogate markers of brain injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease were recruited. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before the intervention and at 3 and 24 hours and 30 days after the intervention to detect new ischemic lesions with DWI. Transcranial Doppler recordings were made during the procedure to assess for microembolic signals (MESs). Data were compared against data from a historical control cohort of patients who underwent CAS placement with or without filter protection (n = 15 each) under the same protocol in a different study.

RESULTS

There were fewer periprocedural new lesions on DWI in the reverse-flow cohort compared with the historical control cohort with filter protection (P = .084). Reverse flow revealed significantly fewer MESs during the whole procedure compared with the filter-protected group (P = .01) but not the unprotected group (P = .55). There was a marked decrease in MES counts for reverse flow protection during the embologenic stages of the procedure (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the reverse flow device was associated with fewer overall lesions on DWI and proportionately fewer positive scans compared with the use of filter-type devices (P = .08, not significant). Transcranial Doppler recordings demonstrated a significant reduction in embolization to the brain during carotid artery stent placement with the use of reverse-flow cerebral protection.

Characteristics of Ischemic Brain Lesions After Stenting or Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

Background and Purpose—

In a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS), more patients had new ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after stenting (CAS) than after endarterectomy (CEA). In the present analysis, we compared characteristics of diffusion-weighted MRI lesions.

Methods—

Number, individual and total volumes, and location of new diffusion-weighted MRI lesions were compared in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to CAS (n=124) or CEA (n=107) in the ICSS-MRI substudy.

Results—

CAS patients had higher lesion numbers than CEA patients (1 lesion, 15% vs 8%; 2–5 lesions, 19% vs 5%; >5 lesions, 16% vs 4%). The overall risk ratio for the expected lesion count with CAS versus CEA was 8.8 (95% confidence interval, 4.4–17.5; P <0.0001) and significantly increased among patients with lower blood pressure at randomization, diabetes mellitus, stroke as the qualifying event, left-side stenosis, and if patients were treated at centers routinely using filter-type protection devices during CAS. Individual lesions were smaller in the CAS group than in the CEA group ( P <0.0001). Total lesion volume per patient did not differ significantly. Lesions in the CAS group were more likely to occur in cortical areas and subjacent white matter supplied by leptomeningeal arteries than lesions in the CEA group (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–10.2; P =0.002).

Conclusions—

Compared with patients undergoing CEA, patients treated with CAS had higher numbers of periprocedural ischemic brain lesions, and lesions were smaller and more likely to occur in cortical areas and subjacent white matter. These findings may reflect differences in underlying mechanisms of cerebral ischemia.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.isrctn.org . Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470.

Strategies for reducing microemboli during carotid artery stenting

Carotid stenting in standard risk patients has recently received supportive recommendations from the American Heart Association, in a guideline document endorsed by 14 societies with diverse but vested interest in carotid intervention. The procedural hazard i.e. the composite endpoint: all-stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI) for carotid stenting and endarterectomy are equivalent, as is survival free of ipsilateral stroke for the two interventional strategies. However, the microembolic burden generated by endarterectomy and stenting is discrepant and although the fate and clinical relevance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging new white lesions and of microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler remain disputed, empathic reasoning would suggest that technical and/or procedural modifications should be explored and employed during carotid stenting in order to try addressing microemboli. This article seeks to define those procedural steps likely to be associated with microemboli during carotid stenting and thus provide avoidance manoeuvres and/or possible solutions.

Strategies and Outcomes for Proximal and Distal Embolic Protection Devices – A Review

Both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are associated with small, but clinically important and discrepant, rates of procedural complications, including cerebral and myocardial ischaemic events, cranial nerve injury and access site haematoma. Embolic protection devices (EPDs) may lower the rate of ipsilateral ischaemic events during CAS and are considered by the majority of interventionists to be mandatory during CAS, although there are no available data from randomised trials based on clinical outcomes to support this practice (perhaps because many thousands of patients would be required to adequately power a trial based on stroke and death endpoints). A recent systematic review of non-randomised data supports the use of EPDs. Worldwide experience demonstrates that all available protection strategies will capture macroemboli generated during endovascular manipulation of carotid bifurcation plaque, thus clearly implying an added level of protection for the brain when these systems are employed, but different philosophies of protection manage the microembolic burden of CAS (i.e. those particles less than 1 mm in diameter) in very different ways. These differences may be assessed by the evaluation of microembolic signals (MES) on transcranial Doppler (TCD) and of new hyperintensities (‘new white lesions’) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) of the brain. Differences between proximal and distal systems may assume clinical relevance, but further work is required before definitive conclusions can be drawn. This article focuses on the clinical and subclinical differences between protection strategies and provides a pragmatic treatment paradigm to support clinical decision-making.

New embolic protection devices: a review

The use of embolic protection (EPD) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) has always made intuitive sense. There is no randomized trial evidence in favour of the use of EPDs and this results from the statistical challenge posed when attempting to compare variations in technique based on the outcome measure all stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI) for a procedure such as CAS which, in experienced units, is associated with such a low baseline hazard. In order to detect a statistically meaningful difference between protected and unprotected populations, many thousands of patents would have to be recruited and this would entail a concerted effort amongst a population of physicians who are largely beyond uncertainty or equipoise regarding this particular issue. Accepting this, each type of device has been shown to capture macroemboli, implying, irrefutably, an added level of protection for the brain during CAS when EPDs are employed. Since their inception early in the last decade, the stenting community has been aware of the limitations of each type of system and accordingly, necessity has driven invention. This review seeks to present data on the newest EPDs, the philosophy behind them, their unique advantages, clinical data supporting their use and data highlighting the influence of these newer systems on the microembolic penalty of CAS, where available.

Carotid artery stenting trials: conduct, results, critique, and current recommendations

The carotid stenting trialists have demonstrated persistence and determination in comparing an evolving technique, carotid artery stenting (CAS), against a mature and exacting standard for carotid revascularisation, carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This review focuses on their endeavours. A total of 12 1-on-1 randomised trials comparing CAS and CEA have been reported; 6 of these can be considered major, and 5 of these reflect (in part) current CAS standards of practice and form the basis of this review. At least 18 meta-analyses seeking to compare CAS and CEA exist. These are limited by the quality and heterogeneity of the data informing them (e.g., five trials were stopped prematurely such that they collectively failed to reach recruitment target by >4000 patients). The Carotid Stenting Trialists' Collaboration Publication represents a prespecified meta-analysis of European trials that were sufficiently similar to allow valid conclusions to be drawn; these trials and conclusions will be explored. When the rate of myocardial infarction (MI) is rigorously assessed, CAS and CEA are equivalent for the composite end point of stroke/death and MI, with more minor strokes for CAS and more MIs for CEA. These outcomes have a discrepant impact on quality of life and subsequent mortality. The all-stroke death outcomes for patients <70 years old are equivalent, with more minor strokes occurring in the elderly during CAS than CEA. There are significantly more severe haematomas and cranial nerve injuries after CEA. The influence of experience on outcome cannot be underestimated.

Asymptomatic carotid disease and cardiac surgery consensus

The Carotid Disease and Cardiac Surgery Consensus Meeting was convened as a multidisciplinary gathering to consider the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery who are found to have asymptomatic carotid artery disease. There are no randomized trials concerning whether carotid interventions are of value in this situation and the natural history is unclear. Bilateral carotid artery disease (≥70% stenosis) should be regarded clinically relevant when considering hemodynamic and short-term surgical stroke risk. However, this may be because the presence of significant carotid disease is also a marker for aortic arch and intracerebral disease. A natural history study is urgently needed to determine the incidence, predictive factors, and natural history of asymptomatic carotid disease in patients undergoing contemporary cardiac surgical interventions to inform the design of any future randomized trial.

Carotid Artery Stenting: Relationship between Experience and Complication Rate

To investigate the evidence for the relationship between volume and outcome for carotid artery stenting. We performed a systematic review of the literature to examine the influence of experience and/or volume on outcome for carotid artery stenting. The primary search strategy was to identify studies presenting year-on-year data. The Pubmed, Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration databases were searched. Studies with over 100 interventions were included. The main outcome measure compared across studies was all stroke/death. Where possible, comparable data were pooled and analysed using meta-regression techniques. It was not possible to perform a standard systematic review and meta-analysis because of the lack of data from randomised studies. When redundant studies were excluded, four sizeable case series and one registry met the inclusion criteria. When the case series results were pooled, the χ2-test for trend demonstrated a significant reduction in the combined stroke and death rate over time. Meta-regression analysis of case series data allowed the setting of thresholds for ‘acceptable’ stroke/death rates. Where year-on-year data are available, published stroke and death rates for carotid artery stenting show improvements over time. While advances in technology and pharmacology may in part be responsible, temporal improvement in outcomes demonstrated in both early and contemporary time-frames together with the consistency of the results suggests the presence of a learning curve. In active carotid artery stenting units, it may take almost 2-years before the stroke/death rates fall below an arbitrary 5% threshold.

Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Stents are an alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis, but previous trials have not established equivalent safety and efficacy. We compared the safety of carotid artery stenting with that of carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

The International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) is a multicentre, international, randomised controlled trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes. Patients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. Randomisation was by telephone call or fax to a central computerised service and was stratified by centre with minimisation for sex, age, contralateral occlusion, and side of the randomised artery. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. Patients were followed up by independent clinicians not directly involved in delivering the randomised treatment. The primary outcome measure of the trial is the 3-year rate of fatal or disabling stroke in any territory, which has not been analysed yet. The main outcome measure for the interim safety analysis was the 120-day rate of stroke, death, or procedural myocardial infarction. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). This study is registered, number ISRCTN25337470.

FINDINGS

The trial enrolled 1713 patients (stenting group, n=855; endarterectomy group, n=858). Two patients in the stenting group and one in the endarterectomy group withdrew immediately after randomisation, and were not included in the ITT analysis. Between randomisation and 120 days, there were 34 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 4.0%) events of disabling stroke or death in the stenting group compared with 27 (3.2%) events in the endarterectomy group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% CI 0.77-2.11). The incidence of stroke, death, or procedural myocardial infarction was 8.5% in the stenting group compared with 5.2% in the endarterectomy group (72 vs 44 events; HR 1.69, 1.16-2.45, p=0.006). Risks of any stroke (65 vs 35 events; HR 1.92, 1.27-2.89) and all-cause death (19 vs seven events; HR 2.76, 1.16-6.56) were higher in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group. Three procedural myocardial infarctions were recorded in the stenting group, all of which were fatal, compared with four, all non-fatal, in the endarterectomy group. There was one event of cranial nerve palsy in the stenting group compared with 45 in the endarterectomy group. There were also fewer haematomas of any severity in the stenting group than in the endarterectomy group (31 vs 50 events; p=0.0197).

INTERPRETATION

Completion of long-term follow-up is needed to establish the efficacy of carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy. In the meantime, carotid endarterectomy should remain the treatment of choice for patients suitable for surgery.

FUNDING

Medical Research Council, the Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, European Union.