The relative role of gonadal sex steroids and gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in the regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in men

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the importance of testosterone (T), estradiol (E(2)), and GnRH pulse frequency to FSH regulation in men.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study with four arms.

SETTING

The study was performed at the General Clinical Research Center.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

There were 20 normal (NL) men and 15 men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) who completed the study.

INTERVENTION

Medical castration and inhibition of aromatase were achieved using ketoconazole x 7 d with: 1) no sex steroid addback, 2) T addback starting on d 4, and 3) E(2) addback starting on d 4. IHH men in these arms received GnRH every 120 min. In a further six IHH men receiving ketoconazole with no addback, GnRH frequency was increased to 35 min for d 4-7. Blood was drawn every 10 min x 12 h at baseline, overnight on d 3-4 and 6-7.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean FSH was calculated from the pool of each frequent sampling study.

RESULTS

In NL men FSH levels increased from 5.1 +/- 0.7 to 8.7 +/- 1.3 and 9.7 +/- 1.5 IU/liter (P < 0.0001). T caused no suppression of FSH. E(2) reduced FSH from 12.4 +/- 1.8 to 9.3 +/- 1.3 IU/liter (P < 0.05). In IHH men on GnRH every 120 min, FSH levels went from 6.0 +/- 1.6 to 9.0 +/- 3.0 and 11.9 +/- 4.3 (P = 0.07). T caused no suppression of FSH. E(2) decreased FSH such that levels on d 6-7 were similar to baseline. Increasing GnRH frequency to 35 min had no impact on FSH.

CONCLUSIONS

The sex steroid component of FSH negative feedback in men is mediated by E(2). Increasing GnRH frequency to castrate levels has no impact on FSH in the absence of sex steroids. When inhibin B levels are NL, sex steroids exert a modest effect on FSH.

Inhibition of luteinizing hormone secretion by testosterone in men requires aromatization for its pituitary but not its hypothalamic effects: evidence from the tandem study of normal and gonadotropin-releasing hormone-deficient men

CONTEXT

Studies on the regulation of LH secretion by sex steroids in men are conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

Our aims were to determine the relative contributions of testosterone (T) and estradiol (E2) to LH regulation and localize their sites of negative feedback.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study with three arms.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a General Clinical Research Center.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two normal (NL) men and 11 men with GnRH deficiency due to idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) participated.

INTERVENTION

Medical castration and inhibition of aromatase were achieved using high-dose ketoconazole (KC) for 7 d with 1) no sex steroid add-back; 2) T enanthate 125 mg im starting on d 4; or 3) E2 patch 37.5 microg/d starting on d 4. Blood sampling was performed every 10 min for 12 h at baseline, overnight on d 3-4 and d 6-7.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean LH levels, LH pulse amplitude, and GnRH pulse frequency were assessed at baseline, d 3-4, and d 6-7.

RESULTS

In NL men, KC caused a 3-fold increase in mean LH on d 3-4, which was stable on d 6-7 with no add-back. Addition of T reduced LH levels (34.6+/-3.9 to 17.4+/-3.6 IU/liter, P<0.05) by slowing GnRH pulse frequency (13.3+/-0.4 to 6.7+/-1.0 pulses/12 h, P<0.005). LH amplitude increased (6.9+/-1.0 to 12.1+/-1.4 IU/liter, P<0.005). E2 add-back suppressed LH levels (36.4+/-5.6 to 19.0+/-2.4 IU/liter, P<0.005), by slowing GnRH pulse frequency (11.4+/-0.2 to 8.6+/-0.4 pulses/12 h, P<0.05) and had no impact on LH pulse amplitude. In IHH men, restoring normal T levels caused no suppression of mean LH levels or LH amplitude. E2 add-back normalized mean LH levels and decreased LH amplitude from 14.7+/-1.7 to 12+/-1.5 IU/liter (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

1) T and E2 have independent effects on LH. 2) Inhibition of LH by T requires aromatization for its pituitary, but not hypothalamic effects. 3) E2 negative feedback on LH occurs at the hypothalamus.

The role of prior pubertal development, biochemical markers of testicular maturation, and genetics in elucidating the phenotypic heterogeneity of idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

As our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) expands, it becomes increasingly important to define the phenotypic spectrum of IHH. In this study we examined historical, clinical, biochemical, histological, and genetic features in 78 men with IHH to gain further insight into the phenotypic heterogeneity of the syndrome. We hypothesized that at least some of the spectrum of phenotypes could be explained by placing the disorder into a developmental and genetic context. Thirty-eight percent of the population had Kallmann syndrome (KS; IHH with anosmia), 54% had normosmic IHH, and 8% had acquired IHH after completion of puberty. Phenotypically, KS represented the most severe subtype (87% with complete absence of any history or signs of spontaneous pubertal development), normosmic IHH displayed the most heterogeneity (41% with some evidence of spontaneous puberty), and acquired IHH after completion of puberty clustered at the mildest end (all had complete puberty). Classification based on historical or clinical evidence of prior pubertal development, rather than the presence or absence of sense of smell, served to distinguish the population more clearly with respect to other clinical and biochemical features. Comparing IHH patients according to the absence (68%) or presence (24%) of some prior pubertal development revealed significant differences in testicular size (3.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 11.8 +/- 1.2 ml; P < 0.001), incidence of cryptorchidism (40% vs. 5%; P < 0.05), microphallus (21% vs. 0%; P < 0.05), inhibin B levels (45 +/- 4 vs. 144 +/- 20 pg/ml; P < 0.0001), and Mullerian inhibitory substance levels (9.8 +/- 1.4 vs. 2 +/- 0.5 ng/ml). Most familial cases had no pubertal development (95% vs. 5%; P < 0.001); males with mutations in the KAL gene displayed the most severe phenotype. Mean gonadotropins levels (LH, 1.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.4 IU/liter; FSH, 2.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.3 IU/liter; P < 0.05) and the finding of apulsatile LH secretion based on frequent sampling (80% vs. 55%; P < 0.05) were statistically different between patients lacking and those exhibiting partial pubertal development, but the overlap was extensive. The use of clinical parameters (presence or absence of some evidence of prior pubertal development, cryptorchidism, and microphallus), biochemical markers of testicular growth and differentiation (inhibin B and Mullerian inhibitory substance), and genetic evidence provides insight into the time of onset and the severity of GnRH deficiency. Viewing IHH in the full context of its developmental, genetic, and biochemical complexity permits greatest insight into its phenotypic variability.

Importance of inhibin B in the regulation of FSH secretion in the human male

Regulation of FSH secretion in the male involves a complex balance between stimulation by GnRH from the hypothalamus, inhibitory feedback by sex steroids (T and E2) and inhibin B (Inh B) from the gonads, and autocrine/paracrine modulation by activin and follistatin within the pituitary. The aim of the present study was to delineate the feedback control of FSH in the human male with specific reference to the relative roles of sex steroids vs. Inh B. Two experimental human models were used: 1) normal (NL) men subjected to acute sex steroid withdrawal (-T, -E2, + Inh B), and 2) functional castrate males (-T, -E2, -Inh B). Nine NL men (age range, 25-45 yr) and three castrate males (age range, 23-47 yr) were studied. The NL men underwent acute sex steroid suppression using high dose ketoconazole (1-g loading dose, followed by 400 mg, orally, four times daily for 150 h). Gonadotropin secretion was characterized by frequent blood sampling every 10 min for 12 h at baseline and on d 3 and 6 of sex steroid ablation. In the three castrate subjects, blood sampling was performed every 5 min for 24 h 8 wk after discontinuing androgen replacement therapy. In the NL men, treatment with ketoconazole resulted in a decline to castrate levels in T (451 +/- 20 to 38 +/- 7 ng/dl; P < 0.0005) and E2 (39 +/- 4 to 15 +/- 2 pg/ml; P < 0.005) and a modest, but significant, decline in Inh B levels, which remained within the normal range (183 +/- 19 to 136 +/- 13 pg/ml; P < 0.005). This suppression of sex steroids was associated with a more marked increase in mean LH (9.5 +/- 0.9 to 24.9 +/- 2.0 IU/liter; P < 0.0001) than FSH levels (5.1 +/- 0.7 to 10.0 +/- 1.5 IU/liter; P < 0.005), with the latter not exceeding the normal adult male range. The castrate subjects had a mean T level of 66 +/- 8 ng/dl, an E2 level of 20 +/- 1 pg/ml, and undetectable Inh B levels. Despite a similar sex steroid milieu, the mean FSH levels observed in NL men after acute sex steroid ablation were approximately 6-fold lower than those seen in the castrate subjects (10.0 +/- 1.5 vs. 59.5 +/- 17.7 IU/liter; P < 0.0005). In contrast, mean LH levels in the NL men were less than 3-fold lower than those in castrate subjects (24.9 +/- 2.0 vs. 66.8 +/- 20.1 IU/liter; P < 0.005). From this human model of acute sex steroid withdrawal, we conclude that Inh B is likely to be the major feedback regulator of FSH secretion in the human male.

The fertile eunuch variant of idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: spontaneous reversal associated with a homozygous mutation in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor

Mutations in the GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) gene have been reported to cause idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). Herein, we describe a 26-yr-old male with a mild phenotypic form of IHH, the fertile eunuch syndrome (IHH in the presence of normal testicular size and some degree of spermatogenesis), associated with a homozygous mutation (Gln106Arg) in the GnRH-R. This mutation, located in the first extracellular loop of the GnRH-R, has been previously shown to decrease but not eliminate GnRH binding. The proband had hypogonadal testosterone levels, detectable but apulsatile gonadotropin secretion, and a normal adult male testicular size of 17 mL at baseline. After only 4 months of treatment with hCG alone, he developed sperm in his ejaculate and his wife conceived. Following cessation of hCG therapy, the patient demonstrated reversal of his hypogonadotropism as evidenced by normal adult male testosterone levels and the appearance of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion. This case thus expands the emerging clinical spectrum of GnRH-R mutations, provides the first genetic basis for the fertile eunuch variant of IHH and documents the occurrence of reversible IHH in a patient with a GnRH-R mutation.

Differential regulation of gonadotropin secretion by testosterone in the human male: absence of a negative feedback effect of testosterone on follicle-stimulating hormone secretion

Studies of sex steroid regulation of gonadotropin secretion in the human male have focused primarily on the respective site(s) of negative feedback of testosterone (T) and estradiol (E(2)). The use of pharmacological doses of sex steroids in these studies has precluded conclusions about the relative roles of T and E(2) in gonadotropin feedback. Thus, the aims of the present study were to 1) determine the relative contributions of T vs. E(2) to the sex steroid component of gonadotropin regulation, and 2) distinguish the feedback effects of T that that are direct (i.e. mediated by the androgen receptor) vs. indirect (mediated by aromatization to E(2)). Two experimental interventions were used: 1) inhibition of aromatization by a selective aromatase inhibitor to examine the impact of selective E(2) withdrawal; and 2) acute medical castration to examine the effect of ablating both T and E(2). Sixteen normal (NL) men (mean age, 30.5 +/- 2.2 yr) were studied. Nine NL subjects were treated with the aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole (10 mg, orally, daily, for 5 days). Twelve NL men underwent medical castration with ketoconazole (1-g loading dose followed by 400 mg, orally, four times a day for 5 days). Ketoconazole-treated subjects received concomitant treatment with dexamethasone (0.5 mg twice daily) to prevent the development of adrenal insufficiency. Single blood samples were drawn daily between 0800-1000 h. To ensure that dexamethasone was not altering the gonadotropin response to sex steroid ablation by a direct pituitary effect, five GnRH-deficient men (mean age, 37.6 +/- 3.9 yr) underwent GnRH dose-response studies at baseline and after treatment with dexamethasone (0.5 mg twice daily). Aromatase blockade caused significant lowering of E(2) (33 +/- 3 to 14 +/- 1 pg/mL; P: < 0.0005) with a corresponding increase in T levels (563 +/- 42 to 817 +/- 81 ng/dL; P: < 0.05). Treatment with ketoconazole resulted in equivalent suppression of E(2) (41 +/- 4 to 14 +/- 1 pg/mL; P: < 0.0005), but also induced castrate levels of T (491 +/- 28 to 40 +/- 3 ng/dL; P: < 0.0005). Both treatment regimens were associated with a significant increase in gonadotropin levels. For LH, the percent increase in serum levels after castration was almost 3-fold greater than that seen after selective E(2) withdrawal (275 +/- 23% with ketoconazole vs. 95.6 +/- 21% with anastrozole; P: < 0.005). Despite the divergent changes in T levels with these two maneuvers (a marked decrease after ketoconazole and a significant increase with anastrozole), the percent rise in FSH levels was similar in the two protocols (91 +/- 6% vs. 71 +/- 7%, respectively; P: = NS). Inhibin B levels were unchanged after selective E(2) withdrawal (156 +/- 23 vs. 176 +/- 19 pg/mL), but decreased slightly with ketoconazole (156 +/- 15 to 131 +/- 11 pg/mL; P: < 0.05). In contrast to the effects of glucocorticoid administration on gonadotropin secretion in women, no significant changes were observed in the GnRH-deficient men treated with dexamethasone in terms of mean LH levels (19.8 +/- 3.2 vs. 23.3 +/- 5.4 IU/L), mean LH pulse amplitude after GnRH (16.0 +/- 2.5 vs. 19.0 +/- 5.1 IU/L), or mean FSH levels (8.0 +/- 1.9 vs. 9.2 +/- 2.4 IU/L, pre vs. post). These studies provide evidence of differential regulation of gonadotropin secretion by T in the human male. T exerts both direct and indirect feedback on LH secretion, whereas its effects on FSH appear to be mediated largely by aromatization to E(2). From these data we conclude that in terms of sex steroid feedback, E(2) is the predominant regulator of FSH secretion in the human male.