The independent and joint risks of alcohol consumption, smoking, and excess weight on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring synergistic associations

OBJECTIVE

Alcohol consumption, smoking, and excess weight independently increase the risk of morbidity/mortality. Less is known about how they interact. This research aims to quantify the independent and joint associations of these exposures across health outcomes and identify whether these associations are synergistic.

STUDY DESIGN

The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42021231443).

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched between 1 January 2010 and 9 February 2022. Eligible peer-reviewed observational studies had to include adult participants from Organisation for Co-Operation and Development countries and report independent and joint associations between at least two eligible exposures (alcohol, smoking, and excess weight) and an ICD-10 outcome (or equivalent). For all estimates, we calculated the synergy index (SI) to identify whether joint associations were synergistic. Meta-analyses were conducted for outcomes with sufficiently homogenous data.

RESULTS

The search returned 26,290 studies, of which 98 were included. Based on 138,130 participants, the combined effect (SI) of alcohol and smoking on head and neck cancer death/disease was 3.78 times greater than the additive effect of each exposure (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.61, 5.48). Based on 2,603,939 participants, the combined effect of alcohol and excess weight on liver disease/death was 1.55 times greater than the additive effect of each exposure (95% CI = 1.33, 1.82).

CONCLUSION

Synergistic associations suggest the true population-level risk may be underestimated. In the absence of bias, individuals with multiple risks would experience a greater absolute risk reduction from an intervention that targets a single exposure than individuals with a single risk.

Emerging and Established Therapeutic Approaches for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

PURPOSE

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), more recently referred to as metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, refers to a disease spectrum ranging from hepatic steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis, associated with hepatic complications (including liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma) and extrahepatic complications (particularly cardiometabolic complications, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease). Treatment options include lifestyle interventions (dietary modification and physical activity programs) and pharmacologic interventions. Treatment aims should be broad, with a hepatic focus (to improve/reverse hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, and steatohepatitis), ideally with additional extrahepatic effects affecting metabolic co-morbidities (eg, insulin resistance, glucose dysregulation, dyslipidemia), causing weight loss and affording cardiovascular protection. NASH and fibrosis represent the main histopathological features that warrant treatment to prevent disease progression. Despite a paucity of established treatments, the array of potential molecular targets, pathways, and potential treatments is continually evolving. The goal of this article was to provide a narrative review summarizing the emerging and more established therapeutic options considering the complex pathophysiology of NAFLD and the important long-term sequelae of this condition.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed by using PubMed, conference abstracts, and press releases from early-phase clinical studies to provide an overview of the evidence.

FINDINGS

As understanding of the pathophysiology of NASH/NAFLD evolves, drugs with different mechanisms of action, targeting different molecular targets and aberrant pathways that mediate hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis, have been developed and are being tested in clinical trials. Pharmacologic therapies fall into 4 main categories according to the molecular targets/pathways they disrupt: (1) meta-bolic targets, targeting insulin resistance, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, or substrate utilization; (2) inflam-matory pathways, inhibiting inflammatory cell recruitment/signaling, reduce oxidative/endoplasmic reticulum stress or are antiapoptotic; (3) the liver-gut axis, which modulates bile acid enterohepatic circulation/signaling or alters gut microbiota; and (4) antifibrotic targets, targeting hepatic stellate cells, decrease collagen deposition or increase fibrinolysis.

IMPLICATIONS

Lifestyle modification must remain the cornerstone of treatment. Pharmacologic treatment is reserved for NASH or fibrosis, the presence of which requires histopathological confirmation. The disease complexity provides a strong rationale for combination therapies targeting multiple pathways simultaneously.

Current and Emerging Biomarkers and Imaging Modalities for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Clinical and Research Applications

PURPOSE

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a metabolic disorder that frequently coexists with obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. The NAFLD spectrum, ranging from hepatic steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis, can be associated with long-term hepatic (hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma) and extrahepatic complications. Diagnosis of NAFLD requires detection of liver steatosis with exclusion of other causes of chronic liver disease. Screening for NAFLD and identification of individuals at risk of end-stage liver disease represent substantial challenges that have yet to be met. NAFLD affects up to 25% of adults, yet only a small proportion will progress beyond steatosis to develop advanced disease (steatohepatitis and fibrosis) associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Identification of this cohort has required the gold standard liver biopsy, which is both invasive and expensive. The use of serum biomarkers and noninvasive imaging techniques is an area of significant clinical relevance. This narrative review outlines current and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of NAFLD, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and hepatic fibrosis.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature using PubMed and reviewed national and international guidelines and conference proceedings to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence.

FINDINGS

Significant advances have been made during the past 2 decades that have enhanced noninvasive assessment of NAFLD without the need for liver biopsy. For the detection of steatosis, abdominal ultrasonography remains the first-line investigation, although a controlled attenuation parameter using transient elastography is more sensitive. For detecting fibrosis, noninvasive serum markers of fibrosis and algorithms based on routine biochemistry are available, in addition to transient elastography. These techniques are well validated and have been incorporated into national and international screening guidelines. These approaches have facilitated more judicious use of liver biopsy but are yet to entirely replace it. Although serum biomarkers present a pragmatic and widely available screening approach for NAFLD in large population-based studies, magnetic resonance imaging techniques offer the benefit of achieving high degrees of accuracy in disease grading, tumor staging, and assessing therapeutic response.

IMPLICATIONS

This diagnostic clinical and research field is rapidly evolving; increasingly combined applications of biomarkers and transient elastography or imaging of selective (intermediate or high risk) cases are being used for clinical and research purposes. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard investigation, particularly in the context of clinical trials, but noninvasive options are emerging, using multimodality assessment, that are quicker, more tolerable, more widely available and have greater patient acceptability.

Innate and adaptive genetic pathways in HCV infection

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) leads to a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. This heterogeneity is underpinned by the host immune response and the genetic factors that govern it. Polymorphisms affecting both the innate and adaptive immunity determine the outcome of exposure. However the innate immune system appears to play a greater role in determining treatment-associated responses. Overall the effects of IFNL3/4 appear dominant over other polymorphic genes. Understanding how host genetics determines the disease phenotype has not been as intensively studied. This review summarizes our current understanding of innate and adaptive immunogenetic factors in the outcome of HCV infection. It focuses on how they relate to resolution and the progression of HCV-related liver disease, in the context of current and future treatment regimes.

A survey of patients' attitudes to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy identifies the value of endoscopist-patient interactive factors

OBJECTIVE

To determine patients' self-reported preferences and expectations for outpatient upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy, including patients' priorities in obtaining a satisfactory healthcare experience, preprocedure anxiety and its causes, and preferred staff roles.

DESIGN

A composite, dedicated endoscopy questionnaire was used. This included demographic information, validated Likert scale anxiety-related questions and a 15-point ranking scale of aspects of care (1=most important to satisfaction; 15=least important).

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Unselected patients attending for an elective UGI endoscopy at two separate units were surveyed on randomly identified days.

RESULTS

A total of 202 out of 254 patients agreed to participate (79.5%). The values identified as most important to patients included technical skill (2.8) and personal manner of the endoscopist (4.9) and the nurses and support staff (5.8), control of discomfort (5.6) and adequacy of the preprocedure explanation (5.8). The factors considered least important included noise levels (12.5), privacy (10.7) and cleanliness (8.7). Moderate to severe anxiety was recorded in half of the patient cohort, predominantly due to anticipation of pain or the results of the procedure. Most patients preferred the endoscopist to discuss the findings of the endoscopy but expressed no preferences regarding the preprocedure explanation.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing UGI endoscopy appear to highly prioritise aspects of care relating to interaction with the endoscopist and the procedure itself. Environmental factors are considered to have much less value. These findings may assist in service redesign around patient-centred care and the development of patient satisfaction surveys in endoscopy.