Heat-not-burn tobacco products and cardiovascular risk reduction: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Heat-not-burn (HNB) technology by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been classified as a modified risk tobacco product, which can be a better option for those populations who cannot give up the habit of smoking. The outlook on the effects of these products is quite controversial in the scientific world.

OBJECTIVE

To present the effect of HNB tobacco products on the cardiovascular system, with reference to the existence of possible benefits of the technology.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, with reliance on a well-defined guiding research statement. Quality appraisal was performed using the CASP checklist for randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

The search of three databases identified 167 records, and after selection process, 25 randomized controlled trials were eligible for our study's criteria. Twenty studies investigated the effects of HNB products on biomarkers of clinical relevance. Five studies evaluated other functional heart parameters rather than biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

With HNB tobacco products, significant reductions were found in biomarkers of exposure and biological effect related to pathways involved in cardiovascular disease, including inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, platelet function, and endothelial dysfunction.

Women leaders in Cardiology. Contemporary profile of the WHO European region

Aims

Women’s participation is steadily growing in medical schools, but they are still not sufficiently represented in cardiology, particularly in cardiology leadership positions. We present the contemporary distribution of women leaders in cardiology departments in the World Health Organization European region.

Methods and results

Between August and December 2020, we applied purposive sampling to collect data and analyse gender distribution of heads of cardiology department in university/third level hospitals in 23 countries: Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, North Macedonia, Morocco, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, and the UK. Age, cardiology subspecialty, and number of scientific publications were recorded for a subgroup of cardiology leaders for whom data were available. A total of 849 cardiology departments were analysed. Women leaders were only 30% (254/849) and were younger than their men counterpart (♀ 52.2 ± 7.7 years old vs. ♂ 58.1 ± 7.6 years old, P = 0.00001). Most women leaders were non-interventional experts (♀ 82% vs. ♂ 46%, P < 0.00001) and had significantly fewer scientific publications than men {♀ 16 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–41] publications vs. ♂ 44 (IQR 9–175) publications, P < 0.00001}.

Conclusion

Across the World Health Organization European region, there is a significant gender disparity in cardiology leadership positions. Fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace is a priority to achieve the full potential and leverage the full talents of both women and men.

Hemodynamic Heterogeneity of Reduced Cardiac Reserve Unmasked by Volumetric Exercise Echocardiography

Background: Two-dimensional volumetric exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) provides an integrated view of left ventricular (LV) preload reserve through end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV contractile reserve (LVCR) through end-systolic volume (ESV) changes. Purpose: To assess the dependence of cardiac reserve upon LVCR, EDV, and heart rate (HR) during ESE. Methods: We prospectively performed semi-supine bicycle or treadmill ESE in 1344 patients (age 59.8 ± 11.4 years; ejection fraction = 63 ± 8%) referred for known or suspected coronary artery disease. All patients had negative ESE by wall motion criteria. EDV and ESV were measured by biplane Simpson rule with 2-dimensional echocardiography. Cardiac index reserve was identified by peak-rest value. LVCR was the stress-rest ratio of force (systolic blood pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/ESV, abnormal values ≤2.0). Preload reserve was defined by an increase in EDV. Cardiac index was calculated as stroke volume index * HR (by EKG). HR reserve (stress/rest ratio) <1.85 identified chronotropic incompetence. Results: Of the 1344 patients, 448 were in the lowest tertile of cardiac index reserve with stress. Of them, 303 (67.6%) achieved HR reserve <1.85; 252 (56.3%) had an abnormal LVCR and 341 (76.1%) a reduction of preload reserve, with 446 patients (99.6%) showing ≥1 abnormality. At binary logistic regression analysis, reduced preload reserve (odds ratio [OR]: 5.610; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 4.025 to 7.821), chronotropic incompetence (OR: 3.923, 95% CI: 2.915 to 5.279), and abnormal LVCR (OR: 1.579; 95% CI: 1.105 to 2.259) were independently associated with lowest tertile of cardiac index reserve at peak stress. Conclusions: Heart rate assessment and volumetric echocardiography during ESE identify the heterogeneity of hemodynamic phenotypes of impaired chronotropic, preload or LVCR underlying a reduced cardiac reserve.

High-sensitive troponin-T as a predictive outcome factor in COVID-19 hospitalised patients: Analysis after one-year follow-up

Introduction: Since December 2019, the humanity is constantly under affection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite global dissemination, neither the treatment or the specific predictive factors have been found or strictly defined yet. Aim: Aim of this study was to assess the long-term (1 year) predictive value of high-sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) in COVID-19 affected, hospitalised patients. Methods: Between 5 March 2020 and 31 March 2020, 87 consecutive patients hospitalised at University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska due to SARS-CoV2caused pneumonia, in whom hsTnT was measured, were included. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess differences in all-cause mortality between the groups. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality were identified through univariateand multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: Compared with patients who had normal hsTnT levels, patients with raised hsTnT were significantly older (70.7 ± 13.23 vs 49 ± 15.29; p < 0.001). Glucose values were significantly increased in patients with raised hsTnT (9.29 ± 5.14 vs 6.76 ± 2.46 [4.1-5.9] mmol/L; p = 0.005), as well as serum creatinine (179.07 ± 225.58 vs 87.53 ± 18.16 µmol/L; p = 0.01), hsTnT (187.43 ± 387.29 vs 7.58 ± 3.40 pg/mL; p = 0.003), D-dimer (5.94 ± 13.78 vs 1.04 ± 1.26 [0-0.50] mg/L; p = 0.024), C-reactive protein (125.92 ± 116.82 vs 69.97 ± 73.09) [< 5.0] mg/L; p = 0.009) and calcium (1.32 ± 0.46 vs 1.03 ± 0.173 [2.20-2.65] mmol/L; p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the number of all-cause deaths at 1 year was 19 of whom 18 were presented with elevated hsTnT (log-rank p < 0.001). When univariate Cox regression was applied, multiple predictors of all-cause mortality have been identified ie age, haemoglobin, haematocrit, urea, CK-MB as well as hsTnT. In a multiple regression model, hsTnT remained an independent predictor of poor outcome. Conclusion: Results from this study showed that the value of hsTnT during hospitalisation is possibly associated with long-term poor outcome of COVID-19 patients. Therefore, hsTnT may appear as a surrogate factor to differentiate between patients at high risk who need more intensive follow-ups.