Abstract 3275: Combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) with pembrolizumab (pembro) in advanced melanoma patients following progression on a prior PD-1 inhibitor: SWOG S1607

We hypothesize that a significant number of patients do not respond to PD-1/L1 blockade because there are no pre-existing tumor antigen-specific T-cells, and this can be addressed by combination therapy with an oncolytic virus such as T-VEC. S1607 is a single arm Phase 2 study of T-VEC plus pembro in patients with advanced melanoma after PD-1/L1 inhibitor progression. The primary endpoint is ORR by modified RECIST (progression at the first follow-up disease assessment had to be confirmed). Secondary endpoints include durable response rate (response ≥ 6 months), ORR in injected, non-visceral non-injected, and visceral lesions, PFS, OS and toxicity. In Cohort A patients must have at least one measurable visceral lesion; in Cohort B patients must not have any visceral lesions. Each cohort had an independent accrual goal with a 2-stage design. All received intratumoral T-VEC and pembro 200mg IV every 21 days. Tumor biopsy and research blood are taken at baseline and on Day 28 (both injected and non-injected lesions). Tumor assessments are performed every 12 weeks for up to 2 years. 38 evaluable patients were enrolled. As of July 26, 2022, the median follow up was 28 months. Treatment was well tolerated, with 5/38 (13%) grade 3 AE (no grade 4/5) including injection site reactions, lymphocyte count decrease, and hypoxia. Cohort A was closed after stage I (n=11) with no confirmed responses. In Cohort B (n=27), there were 7 confirmed responses (26%; 2 CR, 5 PR; this rejected H0: ORR = 10%, p=0.01). Clinical outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Baseline tumor mutational burden from 17 patients in Cohort B were not different between responder vs non-responders (p=0.96). Translational study is ongoing for pharmacodynamic confirmation. T-VEC plus pembro in melanoma patients who have progressed on prior anti-PD1/L1 therapy has efficacy in the subset of melanoma patients who have non-visceral metastases.

Table 1 Cohort A (Visceral) Cohort B(Non-Visceral) N (%; 95% CI) 11 27 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-28%) 7 (26%; 11%-46%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed 1 (9%; 0%-41%) 9 (33%; 17%-54%) Durable response 0 (0%; 0%-28%) 4 (15%; 4%-34%) Median PFS in months 2.1 (0.7-5.5) 2.3 (1.9-6.2) INJECTED LESIONS 11 27 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-28%) 6 (22%; 9%-42%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 1 (9%; 0%-41%) 8 (30%; 14%-50%) NON-INJECTED, NON-VISCERAL LESIONS 8 19 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-37%) 3 (16%; 3%-40%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-37%) 5 (26%; 9%-51%) VISCERAL LESIONS 11 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-28%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 1 (9%; 0%-41%) ACQUIRED RESISTANCE 3 2 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-71%) 2 (100%; 16%-100%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-71%) 2 (100%; 16%-100%) Median PFS in months 2.1 (2.0-4.1) NR (8.0-∞) PRIMARY RESISTANCE 8 25 Confirmed PR + CR 0 (0%; 0%-37%) 5 (20%; 7%-41%) Confirmed + Unconfirmed, PR + CR 1 (13%; 0%-53%) 7 (28%; 12%-49%) Median PFS in months 1.8 (0.3-6.2) 2.1 (1.9-3.3)

Citation Format: Siwen Hu-Lieskovan, James Moon, John Hyngstrom, Katie M. Campbell, Gino K. In, Theodore F. Logan, Kari L. Kendra, Ding M. Wang, Douglas B. Johnson, Gary C. Doolittle, Alan Tan, Ann W. Silk, Kenneth F. Grossmann, Christopher W. Ryan, Sapna P. Patel, Shay Bellasea, Michael C. Wu, John M. Kirkwood, Helen X. Chen, Antoni Ribas. Combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) with pembrolizumab (pembro) in advanced melanoma patients following progression on a prior PD-1 inhibitor: SWOG S1607 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3275.

A phase II study to evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of entinostat in combination with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with renal cell carcinoma previously treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone

668

Background: Immunosuppressive factors such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) limit the efficacy of immunotherapies. We have previously reported that histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have antitumor effects in combination with PD-1 inhibition by inhibiting the function of Tregs and MDSCs in preclinical models. We hypothesized that HDAC inhibition may resensitize patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to immunotherapy. Thus, we opened a Phase II clinical study with the HDAC inhibitor entinostat and the immune check point inhibitors nivolumab (nivo) and ipilimumab (ipi) in clear cell RCC pts previously treated with nivo + ipi or nivo alone. Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of this combination strategy in a dose de-escalation, two stage, phase II clinical trial with a safety lead-in. Due to a funder decision, enrollment was halted after completion of accrual to the safety lead in group. Pts received oral entinostat at a dose of 5 mg (dose level 1) or 3 mg (dose level 2) every 7 days, continuously, with nivo at a dose of 3 mg/kg mg IV every three weeks in combination with ipi at a dose of 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks X 4 doses. Then, nivo 480 mg was continued every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 12 pts with prior nivo+ipi or nivo treatments was enrolled. Dose level 1 (5 pts enrolled) was completed with the following DLTs: thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, pneumonitis. Seven pts were enrolled on dose level 2 which was established as the recommended phase II dose. The most common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue, hypophosphatemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. All were transient. Most of the pts had 2 or more prior treatments. Four pts achieved a partial response, with 3 out 4 pts previously treated with nivo alone (ORR 33%; 95% CI 9.9-65.1). The median PFS was 11.1 months (CI 1.3-26.4). We collected blood samples to conduct several correlative studies including flow cytometry and gene expression analysis on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Conclusions: The preliminary results from this study suggest that the combination of entinostat and nivo+ ipi is relatively well tolerated and may be active in pts with RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03552380 .

Genomic alterations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Impact on survival and clinical outcomes

700

Background: Genomic alterations in RCC can serve as biomarkers for response to therapy. Wild type VHL has shown inferior response to VEGF inhibitors, while patients (pts) with mutated VHL have improved outcomes with immunotherapy (IO)/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. We describe the impact of genomic alterations on outcomes and response to front-line therapy. Methods: Pts with mRCC who underwent genomic sequencing between 2015-2022 at Indiana University and were treated with front-line therapy were included. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze progression free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (OS) using the log rank test to compare groups. Results: 141 pts were included. Median age was 58yrs (range, 24-81). Tumor histology was 68% clear cell, 10% papillary, 9% unclassified, 1% chromophobe, 1% poorly differentiated, and 9% other. 18% of pts had sarcomatoid features; 13% had rhabdoid. 47% pts had metastasis at diagnosis and 53% at relapse. Metastasis sites were lungs 60%, regional lymph nodes (LNs) 41%, bone 36%, distant LNs 21%, liver 17%, and brain 8%. IMDC risk was 18% good, 48% intermediate, 17% poor, and 17% unknown. Front-line therapy was IO/IO in 21%, IO/TKI in 18%, single-agent TKI in 29%, single-agent IO in 6%, and other in 26%. Genetic alterations included VHL in 50%, PBRM1 in 29%, SETD2 in 23%, BAP1 in 16%, and TP53 in 15%. Median follow-up was 2.74yrs (range 0.1-18.6). Overall mPFS with first line therapy was 1.2yrs (95%CI 0.9-1.5). 2-yr OS was 80% (95%CI: 71-86). For pts with a VHL mutation, mPFS was 1.4yrs (95% CI; 0.9-1.8) compared to 0.9yrs (0.5-1.4) for pts without (p=0.38). 2-yr OS for pts with a VHL mutation was 93% (95% CI: 82-97) vs. 68% (95%CI: 54-78) for pts without (p=0.01). No other mutations impacted overall mPFS or 2-yr OS. mPFS for pts treated with IO/IO was 0.6yrs (95%CI 0.3-0.9) vs. 0.9yrs (95%CI 0.5-1.4) for IO/TKI (p=0.09). 2-yr OS for pts treated with IO/IO was 70% (95% CI 44-85) compared to 94% (95% CI 65-99) for IO/TKI (p=0.29). For pts with SETD2 mutations treated with IO/IO, mPFS was 0.7yrs (95%CI 0.3-1.2) vs. 1.4yrs (95%CI 0.8-1.9) for IO/TKI (p=0.01). For pts with BAP1 mutations treated with IO/IO, mPFS was 0.4yrs (95%CI 0.2-1.2) vs. NE (95%CI 0.2-NE) for IO/TKI (p=0.04). The table outlines outcomes by genomic mutation and therapy. Conclusions: VHL mutation was associated with improved 2-yr OS. Pts with SETD2 and BAP1 mutations treated with IO/TKI had improved mPFS, though no differences in OS. [Table: see text]

Combination Dabrafenib and Trametinib Versus Combination Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Patients With Advanced BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: The DREAMseq Trial-ECOG-ACRIN EA6134

PURPOSE

Combination programmed cell death protein 1/cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4-blockade and dual BRAF/MEK inhibition have each shown significant clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exist to guide the choice of either initial therapy or treatment sequence in this population. This study was conducted to determine which initial treatment or treatment sequence produced the best efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a phase III trial, patients with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either combination nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm A) or dabrafenib/trametinib (arm B) in step 1, and at disease progression were enrolled in step 2 to receive the alternate therapy, dabrafenib/trametinib (arm C) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm D). The primary end point was 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were 3-year OS, objective response rate, response duration, progression-free survival, crossover feasibility, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 265 patients were enrolled, with 73 going onto step 2 (27 in arm C and 46 in arm D). The study was stopped early by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of a clinically significant end point being achieved. The 2-year OS for those starting on arm A was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.5 to 79.1) and arm B 51.5% (95% CI, 41.7 to 60.4; log-rank P = .010). Step 1 progression-free survival favored arm A (P = .054). Objective response rates were arm A: 46.0%; arm B: 43.0%; arm C: 47.8%; and arm D: 29.6%. Median duration of response was not reached for arm A and 12.7 months for arm B (P < .001). Crossover occurred in 52% of patients with documented disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred with similar frequency between arms, and regimen toxicity profiles were as anticipated.

CONCLUSION

Combination nivolumab/ipilimumab followed by BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy, if necessary, should be the preferred treatment sequence for a large majority of patients.

Tissue based biomarkers in non-clear cell RCC: Correlative analysis from the ASPEN clinical trial

Biomarkers are needed in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (NC-RCC), particularly papillary renal cell carcinoma, in order to inform on initial treatment selection and identify potentially novel targets for therapy. We enrolled 108 patients in ASPEN, an international randomized open-label phase 2 trial of patients with metastatic papillary, chromophobe, or unclassified NC-RCC treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (n=57) or the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor sunitinib (n=51), stratified by MSKCC risk and histology. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary efficacy endpoints for this exploratory biomarker analysis were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) defined by intention-to-treat using the RECIST 1.1 criteria and radiographic response rates. Tissue biomarkers (n=78) of mTOR pathway activation (phospho-S6 and -Akt, c-kit) and VEGF pathway activation (HIF-1α, c-MET) were prospectively explored in tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry prior to treatment and associated with clinical outcomes. We found that S6 activation was more common in poor risk NC-RCC tumors and S6/Akt activation was associated with worse PFS and OS outcomes with both everolimus and sunitinib, while c-kit was commonly expressed in chromophobe tumors and associated with improved outcomes with both agents. C-MET was commonly expressed in papillary tumors and was associated with lower rates of radiographic response but did not predict PFS for either agent. In multivariable analysis, both pAkt and c-kit were statistically significant prognostic biomarkers of OS. No predictive biomarkers of treatment response were identified for clinical outcomes. Most biomarker subgroups had improved outcomes with sunitinib as compared to everolimus.

Angiokines Associated with Targeted Therapy Outcomes in Patients with Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Biomarkers are needed in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (NC-RCC) to inform treatment selection but also to identify novel therapeutic targets. We thus sought to profile circulating angiokines in the context of a randomized treatment trial of everolimus versus sunitinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ASPEN (NCT01108445) was an international, randomized, open-label phase II trial of patients with metastatic papillary, chromophobe, or unclassified NC-RCC with no prior systemic therapy. Patients were randomized to everolimus or sunitinib and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) defined by RECIST 1.1. Plasma angiokines were collected at baseline, cycle 3, and progression and associated with PFS and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We enrolled 108 patients, 51 received sunitinib and 57 everolimus; of these, 99 patients had evaluable plasma for 23 angiokines. At the final data cutoff, 94 PFS and 64 mortality events had occurred. Angiokines that were independently adversely prognostic for OS were osteopontin (OPN), TIMP-1, thrombospondin-2 (TSP-2), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and VCAM-1, and these were also associated with poor-risk disease. Stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1) was associated with improved survival. OPN was also significantly associated with worse PFS. No statistically significant angiokine-treatment outcome interactions were observed for sunitinib or everolimus. Angiopoeitin-2 (Ang-2), CD-73, HER-3, HGF, IL6, OPN, PIGF, PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, SDF-1, TGF-b1-b2, TGFb-R3, TIMP-1, TSP-2, VCAM-1, VEGF, and VEGF-R1 levels increased with progression on everolimus, while CD-73, ICAM-1, IL6, OPN, PlGF, SDF-1, TGF-b2, TGFb-R3, TIMP-1, TSP-2, VEGF, VEGF-D, and VCAM-1 increased with progression on sunitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic NC-RCC, we identified several poor prognosis angiokines and immunomodulatory chemokines during treatment with sunitinib or everolimus, particularly OPN.

Long-term progression-free survival of patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma following high-dose interleukin-2

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) was approved in the 1990s after demonstrating durable complete responses (CRs) in some patients with metastatic melanoma (mM) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients who achieve this level of disease control have also demonstrated improved survival compared with patients who progress, but limited data are available describing the long-term course. The aim of this study was to better characterize long-term survival following successful HD IL-2 treatment in patients with no subsequent systemic therapy. Eleven HD IL-2 treatment centers identified patients with survival ≥5 years after HD IL-2, with no subsequent systemic therapy. Survival was evaluated from the date of IL-2 treatment to June 2017. Treatment courses consisted of 2 1-week cycles of HD IL-2. Patients were treated with HD IL-2 alone, or HD IL-2 followed by local therapy to achieve maximal response. 100 patients are reported: 54 patients with mM and 46 patients with mRCC. Progression-free survival (PFS) after HD IL-2 ranges from 5+ years to 30+ years, with a median follow-up of 10+ years. 27 mRCC and 32 mM are alive ≥10 years after IL-2. Thus, a small subset of patients with mM and mRCC achieve long-term PFS (≥5 years) after treatment with HD IL-2 as their only systemic therapy. The ability of HD IL-2 therapy to induce prolonged PFS should be a major consideration in studies of new immunotherapy combinations for mM and mRCC.

Immunomodulation by HDAC inhibition: Results from a phase I study with entinostat in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

5064

Background: Immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) limit the efficacy of immunotherapies. We have previously reported that the HDAC inhibitor entinostat has synergistic antitumor effect in combination with immunotherapies in preclinical models by inhibiting Tregs and MDSCs function. The combination of atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and bevacizumab (VEGF inhibitor) is active in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thus, we have conducted a Phase I study with entinostat, atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic RCC. Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability. The phase I portion included 3 dose levels of entinostat (1 mg, 3 mg or 5 mg, PO weekly) and fixed, standard doses of atezolizumab (1200 mg IV every 21 days) and bevacizumab (15 mg/Kg IV every 21 days). Pts with any histological type and prior therapies were included. Results: Dose levels were completed with up to 1 DLT/dose level. 5 mg was the Phase II recommended dose for entinostat. DLTs included hypertension, encephalopathy, hyponatremia and pruritus. The most common resolved grade 3/4 toxicities were hypophosphatemia (33%), hypertension (17%), and pneumonitis (11%). We have enrolled 18 pts (17 evaluable for ORR by RECIST). 5 pts continue on treatment. 3 pts discontinued treatment because of adverse events, 9 pts for disease progression, and one pt for physician decision. Good risk and intermediate risk pts were 61% and 39%, respectively. Overall ORR was 47.1% (95% CI 23.0-72.2) and median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 1.6-16.3). In pts with no prior therapies (12) the ORR was 58.3% (95% CI 27.7-84.8) and median PFS was 13.4 months (95% CI 1.5-28.9). One additional PR was observed by ir-RC but was not confirmed within the data cut-off date of 11/11/19. In pts with prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (5) ORR was 20% (95% CI 0.5-71.6) and median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 1.3-NR). Preliminary data show a statistically significant lower % of circulating monocytic MDSC (HLADR−1CD11b+CD33highCD14+CD15−) and exhausted T cells (CD45+CD3+CD8+TIM3+) following treatment in pts (4) with objective responses as compared to pts (4) with progressive disease. Conclusions: The results from this phase I suggest that the combination of entinostat, atezolizumab and bevacizumab is relatively well tolerated and is active in renal cell carcinoma patients, in both ICIs naïve and resistant disease. A phase II portion of this study is currently accruing patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03024437 .

Phase Ib/II Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab With Bevacizumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: BTCRC-GU14-003

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that bevacizumab will potentiate activity of pembrolizumab. We conducted a phase Ib/II, single-arm, multisite clinical trial of the combination in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic clear cell RCC who experienced progression after at least one systemic therapy (phase Ib) or were treatment naïve (phase II) were enrolled. In phase Ib, pembrolizumab (200 mg) and bevacizumab (10 or 15 mg/kg) were given intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary end point for phase II was overall response rate (ORR). With an 80% statistical power and a type I error probability of 0.1, 48 patients were to be accrued to detect an ORR of 42%.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (ages 33-68 years; median, 55 years) were enrolled in the phase Ib study. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Pembrolizumab 200 mg and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg were chosen for phase II. Forty-eight patients (ages 42-84 years; median age, 61 years; 33 males) were accrued for the phase II study. The primary end point was met, with the ORR reaching 60.9% (95% CI, 45.4% to 74.9%), consisting of 1 complete response (CR), 2 CRs in target lesions, 25 partial responses, 18 responses of stable disease, 2 unevaluable responses. Median progression-free survival was 20.7 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 27.4 months). Median overall survival was not reached at the median follow-up of 28.3 months. The most common treatment-related grade 3 toxicities were hypertension and proteinuria. There were two grade 4 toxicities: duodenal ulcer and hyponatremia. Presence of tumor-infiltrating T cells, but not programmed death-ligand 1 expression, in tumor tissue correlated with response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 200 mg of pembrolizumab and a 15 mg/kg dose of bevacizumab given every 3 weeks is safe and active in metastatic RCC.

Immunomodulation by HDAC inhibition: Results from a phase Ib study with vorinostat and pembrolizumab in metastatic urothelial, renal, and prostate carcinoma patients

2572

Background: Immunosuppressive factors such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs) limit the efficacy of immunotherapies. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have been shown to have immunomodulatory effects. We have previously reported that HDAC inhibitors have synergistic antitumor effects in combination with PD-1 inhibition in tumor models by inhibiting the function of Tregs and MDSCs. Thus, we conducted a Phase Ib clinical study with the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat and the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial, renal and prostate carcinoma. Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination strategy. The phase I portion consisted of two dose levels of vorinostat (100 and 200 mg, PO daily 2 weeks ON and one week OFF) and a fixed, standard dose of pembrolizumab (200 mg IV every 21 days). Patients were assigned to three cohorts: Cohort A (previously treated, anti-PD1/PD-L1 naïve urothelial and renal cancer pts = 15), Cohort B (previously treated, anti-PD1/PD-L1 resistant urothelial and renal cancer pts = 14), and Cohort C (prostate cancer pts = 14). Results: Dose levels 1 (4 enrolled, 3 evaluable) and 2 (4 enrolled, 3 evaluable) were completed without DLTs and 200 mg was the Phase II recommended dose for vorinostat. The most common resolved grade 3/4 toxicities were acute kidney injury (n = 1), anemia (n = 1), diarrhea (n = 1), and hypothyroidism (n = 1) in the dose expansion cohorts. We have enrolled 43 pts (37 evaluable) in the dose expansion cohorts. For Cohort A, B, and C the median PFS were 2.8 months, 5.2 months, and 3.5 months. Two PR were observed including the dose escalation phase. Two PCA pts have achieved undetectable PSA. We have performed several correlative studies including flow cytometry and gene expression analysis on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PDL-1 staining and PSMA PET scans in a subset of pts. Conclusions: The results from this phase Ib suggest that the combination of vorinostat and pembrolizumab is relatively well tolerated and may be active in a subset of immune checkpoint resistant UC/RCC pts and immune checkpoint naïve PCA pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02619253.

A phase 2, randomized trial evaluating the combination of dalantercept plus axitinib in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In a prior open-label study, the combination of dalantercept, a novel antiangiogenic targeting activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1), plus axitinib was deemed safe and tolerable with a promising efficacy signal in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

In the current phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with clear cell RCC previously treated with 1 prior angiogenesis inhibitor were randomized 1:1 to receive axitinib plus dalantercept versus axitinib plus placebo. Randomization was stratified by the type of prior therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS in patients with ≥2 prior lines of anticancer therapy, overall survival, and the objective response rate.

RESULTS

Between June 10, 2014, and February 23, 2017, a total of 124 patients were randomly assigned to receive axitinib plus dalantercept (59 patients) or placebo (65 patients). The median PFS was not found to be significantly different between the treatment groups (median, 6.8 months vs 5.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.71-1.73; P = .670]). Neither group reached the median overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.70-2.77; P = .349]). The objective response rate was 19.0% (11 of 58 patients; 95% CI, 9.9%-31.4%) in the dalantercept plus axitinib group and 24.6% (15 of 61 patients; 95% CI, 14.5%-37.3%) in the placebo plus axitinib group. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event of ≥grade 3 was observed in 59% of patients (34 of 58 patients) in the dalantercept group and 64% of patients (39 of 61 patients) in the placebo group. One treatment-related death occurred in the placebo plus axitinib group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although well tolerated, the addition of dalantercept to axitinib did not appear to improve treatment-related outcomes in previously treated patients with advanced RCC.

NCI 8628: A randomized phase 2 study of ziv-aflibercept and high-dose interleukin 2 or high-dose interleukin 2 alone for inoperable stage III or IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 2 (IL-2) is a growth factor for T and natural killer cells, promotes proinflammatory cytokines, and can lead to durable responses in patients with melanoma. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis and modulates host innate and adaptive immunity. High VEGF levels were found to be associated with nonresponse to IL-2. Ziv-aflibercept may deplete VEGF and thereby enhance antitumor T-cell responses, thus supporting a combination immunotherapeutic strategy with IL-2.

METHODS

NCI 8628 was a phase 2 trial of ziv-aflibercept and IL-2 (arm A) versus IL-2 alone (arm B) randomized at 2:1, respectively. Eligible patients had inoperable American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or stage IV melanoma. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients were enrolled and 84 patients were treated. The median follow-up was 41.4 months. Among treated patients (55 patients in arm A and 29 patients in arm B), PFS was significantly improved in favor of arm A, with a median of 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.1-8.7 months) versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.6-3.5 months) (P<.001). No significant difference was noted with regard to overall survival, with a median of 26.9 months (95% CI, 14.4-63.6 months) for arm A and 24.2 months (95% CI, 11.3-36.4 months) for arm B. The response rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST]) was 22% in arm A (4 complete responses [CRs] and 8 partial responses [PRs]) and 17% in arm B (1 CR and 4 PRs). Stable disease or PR or CR was noted in 65% of patients in arm A and 48% of patients in arm B. The combination was found to be superior to monotherapy in patients with high and low levels of serum VEGF and VEGF receptor 2. Adverse events were consistent with the expected profiles of monotherapy with IL-2 and ziv-aflibercept.

CONCLUSIONS

Ziv-aflibercept and IL-2 were found to significantly improve PFS compared with IL-2 alone, thereby meeting the primary endpoint of the current study. These findings support further study of immunotherapeutic combination strategies involving VEGF inhibitors.

A multi-center phase II study of high dose interleukin-2 sequenced with vemurafenib in patients with BRAF-V600 mutation positive metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies suggest that BRAF inhibitors enhance anti-tumor immunity and antigen presentation. Combination BRAF inhibition with immunotherapy is an appealing therapeutic approach. We sequenced vemurafenib with HD IL-2 in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma to improve long term outcomes.

METHODS

Eligible patients were HD IL-2 eligible with metastatic BRAF V600 mutated melanoma. Cohort 1 was treatment naïve and received vemurafenib 960 mg BID for 6 weeks before HD IL-2. Cohort 2 received vemurafenib for 7-18 weeks before enrollment. Both cohorts received HD IL-2 at 600,000 IU/kg every 8 h days 1-5 and days 15-19. The primary objective was to assess complete responses (CR) at 10 weeks ±3 (assessment 1) and 26 weeks ±3 (assessment 2) from the start of HD IL-2.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were enrolled, (cohort 1, n = 38; cohort 2, n = 15). Of these, 39 underwent assessment 1 and 15 assessment 2. The CR rate at assessment 1 was 10% (95% CI 3-24) for both cohorts combined, and 27% (95% CI 8-55) at assessment 2. Three-year survival was 30 and 27% for cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. No unexpected toxicities occurred. A shift in the melanoma treatment landscape during this trial adversely affected accrual, leading to early trial closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Vemurafenib in sequence with HD IL-2 did not change the known toxicity profile for either agent. Lower than expected response rates to vemurafenib were observed. Overall response rates and durability of responses appear similar to that observed with HD IL-2 alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCTN, NCT01683188. Registered 11 September 2012, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT01683188.

Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Ipilimumab Alone in Patients With Advanced, Unresectable Melanoma

Purpose

We evaluated the combination of talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II study. To our knowledge, this was the first randomized trial to evaluate addition of an oncolytic virus to a checkpoint inhibitor.

Methods

Patients with unresectable stages IIIB to IV melanoma, with no more than one prior therapy if BRAF wild-type, no more than two prior therapies if BRAF mutant, measurable/injectable disease, and without symptomatic autoimmunity or clinically significant immunosuppression were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Talimogene laherparepvec treatment began in week 1 (first dose, ≤ 4 mL × 106 plaque-forming units/mL; after 3 weeks, ≤ 4 mL × 108 plaque-forming units/mL every 2 weeks). Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; up to four doses) began week 1 in the ipilimumab alone arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by investigators per immune-related response criteria.

Results

One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab (n = 98), or ipilimumab alone (n = 100). Thirty-eight patients (39%) in the combination arm and 18 patients (18%) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5; P = .002). Responses were not limited to injected lesions; visceral lesion decreases were observed in 52% of patients in the combination arm and 23% of patients in the ipilimumab arm. Frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (combination, 59%; ipilimumab alone, 42%), chills (combination, 53%; ipilimumab alone, 3%), and diarrhea (combination, 42%; ipilimumab alone, 35%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 45% and 35%, respectively. Three patients in the combination arm had fatal AEs; none were treatment related.

Conclusion

The study met its primary end point; the objective response rate was significantly higher with talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone. These data indicate that the combination has greater antitumor activity without additional safety concerns versus ipilimumab.

Targeting autophagy and immunotherapy with hydroxychloroquine and interleukin 2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A Cytokine Working Group study

106

Background: We performed a Phase II study of the combination of the autophagy inhibitor, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), along with high dose IL-2 in patients with advanced renal cancer. 31 patients were entered on this Cytokine Working Group Study conducted at six member institutions;NCT01550367. This combination in murine models was associated with diminished toxicity and increased efficacy, and, in preliminary studies, diminished high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein, consistent with its established role in serving as a Damage Associated Molecular Pattern (DAMP) molecule and inducer of autophagy. Methods: The Study Design involved initiating oral Hydroxychloroquine 300 mg P.O bid. Aldesleukin (600,000 IU/kg) was administered q8hrs in courses consisting of two cycles separated by 7-14 days and constituting a single course. For patients with stable or responsive disease, additional courses were administered every approximately 85-90 days. Serum, plasma, Paxgene tubes, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained sequentially prior to therapy initiation and sequentially on D1 and D2 of each cycle following initiation of therapy. Results: 31 patients (9F, 22M) have been registered and 3 confirmed complete responses observed; the current median overall survival has not been reached in the 29pts. The Baseline Karnofsky Score of 100 (17pts), 90 (13pts), and 80(1 pt). The mean age was 57.5 years, range = (45.2, 68.8). 26 patients had a mean of 12.5 doses +/-4.7 (3, 23) with 13 pts receiving a second course and 4, a third. Platelet nadir was diminished from baseline by 26%. Of the 27 patients in the data set, 18 had at least one Grade 4 toxicity at least possibly related to treatment, and 9 patients had at least one Grade 3 adverse event at least possibly related to treatment but no Grade 4 events.Serologic and cellular data and complete clinical data will be submitted with the completed abstract. Conclusions: The combination of high dose aldesleukin and daily oral HCQ was well tolerated. We have concluded this trial and will report mature survival data, toxicity data, and biomarkers/autophagy measures with the final submission. Clinical trial information: NCT01550367.

Improved survival and tumor control with Interleukin-2 is associated with the development of immune-related adverse events: data from the PROCLAIMSM registry

BACKGROUND

Immune related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with immunotherapy for cancer and while results suggest improvement in tumor control and overall survival in those experiencing irAEs, the long-term impact is debated. We evaluated irAE reports related to high dose interleukin-2 therapy (IL-2) documented in the PROCLAIMSM registry data base from 2008 to 2016 (NCT01415167, August 9, 2011).

METHODS

Reports on 1535 patients, including 623 with metastatic melanoma (mM) and 919 with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) (7 patients had both diseases), were queried for irAEs. The timing of the event was categorized as occurring before, during or after IL-2 or related to any checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). mM patients and mRCC patients were analyzed separately. Tumor control [complete + partial response + stable disease (CR + PR + SD) was compared between those experiencing no irAE versus those with the development of irAEs. Survival was analyzed by tumor type related to timing of irAE and IL-2, and in those with or without exposure to CPI.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 3.5+ years (range 1-8+ years), 152 irAEs were reported in 130 patients (8.4% of all PROCLAIMSM patients): 99 (16%) in mM and 53 (5.8%) in mRCC patients. 31 irAEs occurred prior to IL-2, 24 during IL-2, and 97 after IL-2 therapy. 74 irAEs were attributed to IL-2 only (during/ after IL-2). Of the 97 post IL-2 irAEs, 24 were attributed to CPI, and 15 could not be distinguished as caused by IL-2 or CPI. Tumor control was 71% for those experiencing irAE, and 56% for those with no irAE (p = 0.0008). Overall survival was significantly greater for those experiencing irAEs during/ after IL-2 therapy, compared to those with no irAE or irAE before IL-2 therapy, in mM patients, median 48 months vs 18 months (p < 0.0001), and in mRCC patients, median 60 months vs 40 months (p = 0.0302), independent of CPI-related irAEs. IL-2-related irAEs were primarily vitiligo and thyroid dysfunction (70% of IL-2 related irAEs), with limited further impact.

CONCLUSIONS

irAEs following IL-2 therapy are associated with improved tumor control and overall survival. IrAEs resulting from IL-2 and from CPIs are qualitatively different, and likely reflect different mechanisms of action of immune activation and response.

Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Ipilimumab Alone in Patients With Advanced, Unresectable Melanoma

Purpose We evaluated the combination of talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II study. To our knowledge, this was the first randomized trial to evaluate addition of an oncolytic virus to a checkpoint inhibitor. Methods Patients with unresectable stages IIIB to IV melanoma, with no more than one prior therapy if BRAF wild-type, no more than two prior therapies if BRAF mutant, measurable/injectable disease, and without symptomatic autoimmunity or clinically significant immunosuppression were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Talimogene laherparepvec treatment began in week 1 (first dose, ≤ 4 mL × 10⁶ plaque-forming units/mL; after 3 weeks, ≤ 4 mL × 10⁸ plaque-forming units/mL every 2 weeks). Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; up to four doses) began week 1 in the ipilimumab alone arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by investigators per immune-related response criteria. Results One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab (n = 98), or ipilimumab alone (n = 100). Thirty-eight patients (39%) in the combination arm and 18 patients (18%) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5; P = .002). Responses were not limited to injected lesions; visceral lesion decreases were observed in 52% of patients in the combination arm and 23% of patients in the ipilimumab arm. Frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (combination, 59%; ipilimumab alone, 42%), chills (combination, 53%; ipilimumab alone, 3%), and diarrhea (combination, 42%; ipilimumab alone, 35%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 45% and 35%, respectively. Three patients in the combination arm had fatal AEs; none were treatment related. Conclusion The study met its primary end point; the objective response rate was significantly higher with talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone. These data indicate that the combination has greater antitumor activity without additional safety concerns versus ipilimumab.

Results from an Integrated Safety Analysis of Urelumab, an Agonist Anti-CD137 Monoclonal Antibody

Purpose: Urelumab is an agonist antibody to CD137 with potential application as an immuno-oncology therapeutic. Data were analyzed to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic activity of urelumab, including the dose selected for ongoing development in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma.Experimental Design: A total of 346 patients with advanced cancers who had progressed after standard treatment received at least one dose of urelumab in one of three dose-escalation, monotherapy studies. Urelumab was administered at doses ranging from 0.1 to 15 mg/kg. Safety analyses included treatment-related and serious adverse events (AEs), as well as treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation and death, with a focus on liver function test abnormalities and hepatic AEs.Results: Urelumab doses between 1 and 15 mg/kg given every 3 weeks resulted in a higher frequency of treatment-related AEs than 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Dose was the single most important factor contributing to transaminitis development, which was more frequent and severe at doses ≥1 mg/kg. At the MTD of 0.1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, urelumab was relatively well tolerated, with fatigue (16%) and nausea (13%) being the most common treatment-related AEs, and was associated with immunologic and pharmacodynamic activity demonstrated by the induction of IFN-inducible genes and cytokines.Conclusions: Integrated evaluation of urelumab safety data showed significant transaminitis was strongly associated with doses of ≥1 mg/kg. However, urelumab 0.1 mg/kg every 3 weeks was demonstrated to be safe, with pharmacodynamic activity supporting continued clinical evaluation of this dose as monotherapy and in combination with other immuno-oncology agents. Clin Cancer Res; 23(8); 1929-36. ©2016 AACR.

Safety and preliminary activity of hydroxychloroquine and aldesleukin in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A cytokine working group study

440

Background: Aldesleukin (recombinant human interleukin-2) has been an FDA-approved treatment for mRCC since 1992, based on a 5-10% rate of durable complete remissions. Autophagy is a protective mechanism that enables cells to survive the metabolic stress of cancer therapy. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) inhibits cellular autophagy and has shown synergy with interleukin-2 in animal tumor models. We hypothesized that this combination would be tolerable and active in patients with mRCC. Methods: The Cytokine Working Group initiated a study of high-dose aldesleukin in combination with oral HCQ for patients with mRCC. Subjects receive up to 6 cycles of aldeskleukin, 600,000 International Units per kg, on a standard schedule. HCQ is administered orally starting 2 weeks prior to the first dose of aldesleukin and continuing up to one year. The initial HCQ dose was 600 mg daily, with a planned dose escalation to 1200 mg daily after safety was demonstrated in five subjects. Subjects were monitored for safety and tolerability as well as response per RECIST 1.1. Results: Five subjects were treated at the first dose level of 600 mg daily HCQ plus aldesleukin with no unexpected toxicity. Thirteen subjects were then treated at HCQ 1200 mg daily with aldesleukin. Of these, two experienced hypotension and tachycardia and 1 patient died from pulmonary emboli. The cardiac events were consistent with aldesleukin toxicity, but were observed earlier in the course of treatment than anticipated for aldesleukin alone. HCQ dose was therefore de-escalated to 600 mg daily, and 8 additional subjects have been enrolled with no unexpected toxicity. In 26 of 39 planned subjects, there has been 1 complete response (CR) and 1 partial response (near CR), both in the 600 mg cohort. As of Oct 24, 2016, after a median of 36.6 months of follow-up, seven out of 26 subject have died, with median overall survival not yet obtained (95% C.I. = (29.6 months,unknown)). Conclusions: HCQ in combination with aldesleukin was found to be tolerable at a dose of 600 mg daily, with expected toxicities. Clinical responses have been observed. Clinical trial information: NCT01550367.

Contemporary experience with high-dose interleukin-2 therapy and impact on survival in patients with metastatic melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) was approved for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 1992 and for metastatic melanoma (mM) in 1998, in an era predating targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The PROCLAIM^SM registry was established to collect and analyze data for patients treated with HD IL-2 in the current era. This analysis includes 170 patients with mM and 192 patients with mRCC treated between 2005 and 2012 with survival data current as of July 27, 2015. For patients with mM, complete response (CR) was observed in 5 %, partial response (PR) in 10 %, stable disease (SD) in 22 %, and 63 % had progressive disease (PD). The median overall survival (mOS) for these patients was 19.6 months, with a median follow-up of 43.1 months. The mOS was not reached for patients achieving CR or PR, and was 33.4 months for patients with SD. For patients with mRCC, 6 % achieved CR, 9 % had PR, 22 % had SD, and 62 % had PD. The mOS was 41 months, with a median follow-up of 46.6 months. The mOS for patients who had CR and PR was not reached and was 49.6 months for patients with SD. There were no treatment-related deaths among 362 patients. The duration of mOS for patients with mM and mRCC is longer than historically reported. These data support a continued role for IL-2 in the treatment of eligible patients with mM or mRCC and warrant further evaluation of HD IL-2 in combination or sequence with other therapeutic agents.

Sequential administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab with a planned switch in patients with advanced melanoma (CheckMate 064): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Concurrent administration of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab has shown greater efficacy than either agent alone in patients with advanced melanoma, albeit with more high-grade adverse events. We assessed whether sequential administration of nivolumab followed by ipilimumab, or the reverse sequence, could improve safety without compromising efficacy.

METHODS

We did this randomised, open-label, phase 2 study at nine academic medical centres in the USA. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma (treatment-naive or who had progressed after no more than one previous systemic therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1) were randomly assigned (1:1) to induction with intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for six doses followed by a planned switch to intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, or the reverse sequence. Randomisation was done by an independent interactive voice response system with a permuted block schedule (block size four) without stratification factors. After induction, both groups received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was treatment-related grade 3-5 adverse events until the end of the induction period (week 25), analysed in the as-treated population. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved a response at week 25 and disease progression at weeks 13 and 25. Overall survival was a prespecified exploratory endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01783938, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients.

FINDINGS

Between April 30, 2013, and July 21, 2014, 140 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to nivolumab followed by ipilimumab (n=70) or to the reverse sequence of ipilimumab followed by nivolumab (n=70), of whom 68 and 70 patients, respectively, received at least one dose of study drug and were included in the analyses. The frequencies of treatment-related grade 3-5 adverse events up to week 25 were similar in the nivolumab followed by ipilimumab group (34 [50%; 95% CI 37·6-62·4] of 68 patients) and in the ipilimumab followed by nivolumab group (30 [43%; 31·1-55·3] of 70 patients). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events during the whole study period were colitis (ten [15%]) in the nivolumab followed by ipilimumab group vs 14 [20%] in the reverse sequence group), increased lipase (ten [15%] vs 12 [17%]), and diarrhoea (eight [12%] vs five [7%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The proportion of patients with a response at week 25 was higher with nivolumab followed by ipilimumab than with the reverse sequence (28 [41%; 95% CI 29·4-53·8] vs 14 [20%; 11·4-31·3]). Progression was reported in 26 (38%; 95% CI 26·7-50·8) patients in the nivolumab followed by ipilimumab group and 43 (61%; 49·0-72·8) patients in the reverse sequence group at week 13 and in 26 (38%; 26·7-50·8) and 42 (60%; 47·6-71·5) patients at week 25, respectively. After a median follow-up of 19·8 months (IQR 12·8-25·7), median overall survival was not reached in the nivolumab followed by ipilimumab group (95% CI 23·7-not reached), whereas over a median follow-up of 14·7 months (IQR 5·6-23·9) in the ipilimumab followed by nivolumab group, median overall survival was 16·9 months (95% CI 9·2-26·5; HR 0·48 [95% CI 0·29-0·80]). A higher proportion of patients in the nivolumab followed by ipilimumab group achieved 12-month overall survival than in the ipilimumab followed by nivolumab group (76%; 95% CI 64-85 vs 54%; 42-65).

INTERPRETATION

Nivolumab followed by ipilimumab appears to be a more clinically beneficial option compared with the reverse sequence, albeit with a higher frequency of adverse events.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Nivolumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody that restores T-cell immune activity. This phase II trial assessed the antitumor activity, dose-response relationship, and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clear-cell mRCC previously treated with agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway were randomly assigned (blinded ratio of 1:1:1) to nivolumab 0.3, 2, or 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the dose-response relationship as measured by progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were randomly assigned to the nivolumab 0.3- (n = 60), 2- (n = 54), and 10-mg/kg (n = 54) cohorts. One hundred eighteen patients (70%) had received more than one prior systemic regimen. Median PFS was 2.7, 4.0, and 4.2 months, respectively (P = .9). Respective ORRs were 20%, 22%, and 20%. Median OS was 18.2 months (80% CI, 16.2 to 24.0 months), 25.5 months (80% CI, 19.8 to 28.8 months), and 24.7 months (80% CI, 15.3 to 26.0 months), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) was fatigue (24%, 22%, and 35%, respectively). Nineteen patients (11%) experienced grade 3 to 4 treatment-related AEs.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile across the three doses studied in mRCC. No dose-response relationship was detected as measured by PFS. These efficacy and safety results in mRCC support study in the phase III setting.

Whole-body PET/CT evaluation of tumor perfusion using generator-based 62Cu-ethylglyoxal bis(thiosemicarbazonato)copper(II): validation by direct comparison to 15O-water in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

This study was undertaken to demonstrate the feasibility of whole-body (62)Cu-ethylglyoxal bis(thiosemicarbazonato)copper(II) ((62)Cu-ETS) PET/CT tumor perfusion imaging in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma and to validate (62)Cu-ETS as a quantitative marker of tumor perfusion by direct comparison with (15)O-water perfusion imaging.

METHODS

PET/CT imaging of 10 subjects with stage IV renal cell cancer was performed after intravenous administration of (15)O-water (10-min dynamic list-mode study) with the heart and at least 1 tumor in the PET field of view, followed 10 min later by intravenous (62)Cu-ETS (6-min list-mode study). Whole-body (62)Cu imaging was then performed from 6 to 20 min at 2-3 min/bed position. Blood flow (K1) was quantified with both agents for normal and malignant tissues in the 21.7-cm dynamic field of view. The required arterial input functions were derived from the left atrium and, in the case of (62)Cu-ETS, corrected for partial decomposition of the agent by blood with data from an in vitro analysis using a sample of each patient's blood. This imaging protocol was repeated at an interval of 3-4 wk after initiation of a standard clinical treatment course of the antiangiogenic agent sunitinib.

RESULTS

All subjects received the scheduled (62)Cu-ETS doses for the dynamic and subsequent whole-body PET/CT scans, but technical issues resulted in no baseline (15)O-water data for 2 subjects. Direct comparisons of the perfusion estimates for normal tissues and tumor metastases were made in 18 paired baseline and treatment studies (10 subjects; 8 baseline studies, 10 repeated studies during treatment). There was an excellent correlation between the blood flow estimates made with (62)Cu-ETS and (15)O-water for normal tissues (muscle, thyroid, myocardium) and malignant lesions (pulmonary nodules, bone lesions); the regression line was y = 0.85x + 0.15, R(2) = 0.83, for the 88 regions analyzed.

CONCLUSION

(62)Cu-ETS provided high-quality whole-body PET/CT images, and (62)Cu-ETS measures of blood flow were highly and linearly correlated with (15)O-water-derived K1 values (mL(-1) ⋅ min(-1) ⋅ g). This tracer is suitable for use as a PET tracer of tumor perfusion in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The high-dose aldesleukin "select" trial: a trial to prospectively validate predictive models of response to treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

High-dose aldesleukin (HD IL2) received FDA approval for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) in 1992, producing a 14% objective response rate (ORR) and durable remissions. Retrospective studies suggested that clinical and pathologic features could predict for benefit. The Cytokine Working Group conducted this prospective trial to validate proposed predictive markers of response to HD IL2.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Standard HD IL2 was administered to prospectively evaluate whether the ORR of patients with mRCC with "good" predictive pathologic features based on an "integrated selection" model [ISM (e.g., clear-cell histology subclassification and carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9) IHC staining] was significantly higher than the ORR of a historical, unselected population. Archived tumor was collected for pathologic analysis including tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty eligible patients were enrolled between June 11 and September 7; 70% were Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) intermediate risk, 96% had clear cell RCC, and 99% had prior nephrectomy. The independently assessed ORR was 25% (30/120, 95% CI, 17.5%-33.7%, P = 0.0014; 3 complete responses, 27 partial responses) and was higher than a historical ORR. Thirteen patients (11%) remained progression free at 3 years and the median overall survival was 42.8 months. ORR was not statistically different by ISM classification ("good-risk" 23% vs. "poor-risk" 30%; P = 0.39). ORR was positively associated with tumor PD-L1 expression (P = 0.01) by IHC.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective, biomarker validation study, HD IL2 produced durable remissions and prolonged survival in both "good" and "poor-risk" patients. The proposed ISM was unable to improve the selection criteria. Novel markers (e.g., tumor PD L1 expression) appeared useful, but require independent validation.

Phase I dose escalation study of recombinant interleukin-21 (rIL-21; BMS-982470) in combination with nivolumab (anti-PD-1; BMS-936558; ONO-4538) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

TPS3112

Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an immune checkpoint receptor that attenuates T-cell activation by binding to its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. Nivolumab, a PD-1 receptor blocking antibody, has shown durable antitumor activity in pts with various solid tumors in two phase I clinical trials. The cytokine rIL-21 has also shown antitumor activity in selected solid tumors. We hypothesized that combining rIL-21-induced stimulation of T-cell and NK-cell function in conjunction with T-cell checkpoint blockade using nivolumab could enhance biologic activity resulting in improved clinical outcomes, as compared with either agent alone. We describe a novel phase I study investigating the biologic activity and clinical outcomes of the combination in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This ongoing study (N=160) includes a dose escalation phase (Part 1) using a 3 + 3 design followed by an expansion phase (Part 2). In Part 1 (N=60), successive pt cohorts with advanced solid tumors are being treated with escalating doses of rIL-21 (10, 30, 50, 75, or 100 µg/kg IV) on two distinct schedules (Arms A and B) in combination with fixed-dose nivolumab (3 mg/kg q 2 weeks) in 6 week cycles. Arm A administers rIL-21 on a weekly schedule, given on day 1 in weeks 1–4 of the 6 week cycle. Arm B administers rIL-21 at 3x per week during weeks 1 and 3 of the 6 week cycle. In Part 2, pts with renal cell carcinoma (N=50) or non-small cell lung carcinoma (N=50) will each be randomized to treatment at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose, if no MTD is determined, for Arm A or Arm B. Therapy for pts who are stable or responding in Parts 1 and 2 may be continued for up to 2 years or until treatment discontinuation criteria are met. Primary objectives are to evaluate the safety of rIL-21 + nivolumab, and to define the MTD of the 2 schedules. Secondary and exploratory objectives include a preliminary assessment of the antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, immunoregulatory activity (peripheral blood, tumor) and immunogenicity of this combination. Clinical trial information: NCT01629758.

Phase II and biomarker study of the dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor foretinib in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Foretinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET, VEGF, RON, AXL, and TIE-2 receptors. Activating mutations or amplifications in MET have been described in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of foretinib in patients with PRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled onto the study in two cohorts with different dosing schedules of foretinib: cohort A, 240 mg once per day on days 1 through 5 every 14 days (intermittent arm); cohort B, 80 mg daily (daily dosing arm). Patients were stratified on the basis of MET pathway activation (germline or somatic MET mutation, MET [7q31] amplification, or gain of chromosome 7). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients were enrolled, with 37 in each dosing cohort. ORR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 was 13.5%, median progression-free survival was 9.3 months, and median overall survival was not reached. The presence of a germline MET mutation was highly predictive of a response (five of 10 v five of 57 patients with and without germline MET mutations, respectively). The most frequent adverse events of any grade associated with foretinib were fatigue, hypertension, gastrointestinal toxicities, and nonfatal pulmonary emboli.

CONCLUSION

Foretinib demonstrated activity in patients with advanced PRCC with a manageable toxicity profile and a high response rate in patients with germline MET mutations.

Safety profile and pharmacokinetic analyses of the anti-CTLA4 antibody tremelimumab administered as a one hour infusion

Background

CTLA4 blocking monoclonal antibodies provide a low frequency but durable tumor responses in patients with metastatic melanoma, which led to the regulatory approval of ipilimumab based on two randomized clinical trials with overall survival advantage. The similarly fully human anti-CTLA4 antibody tremelimumab had been developed in the clinic at a fixed rate infusion, resulting in very prolonged infusion times. A new formulation of tremelimumab allowed testing a shorter infusion time.

Methods

A phase 1 multi-center study to establish the safety and tolerability of administering tremelimumab as a 1-hour infusion to patients with metastatic melanoma. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic and clinical effects of tremelimumab.

Results

No grade 3 or greater infusion-related adverse events or other adverse events preventing the administration of the full tremelimumab dose were noted in 44 treated patients. The overall side effect profile was consistent with prior experiences with anti-CTLA4 antibodies. Objective tumor responses were noted in 11% of evaluable patients with metastatic melanoma, which is also consistent with the prior experience with CTLA4 antagonistic antibodies.

Conclusions

This study did not identify any safety concerns when tremelimumab was administered as a 1-hour infusion. These data support further clinical testing of the 1-hour infusion of tremelimumab. (Clinical trial registration number NCT00585000).

Ipilimumab in patients with melanoma and brain metastases: an open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases commonly develop in patients with melanoma and are a frequent cause of death of patients with this disease. Ipilimumab improves survival in patients with advanced melanoma. We aimed to investigate the safety and activity of this drug specifically in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

Between July 31, 2008, and June 3, 2009, we enrolled patients with melanoma and brain metastases from ten US centres who were older than 16 years into two parallel cohorts. Patients in cohort A were neurologically asymptomatic and were not receiving corticosteroid treatment at study entry; those in cohort B were symptomatic and on a stable dose of corticosteroids. Patients were to receive four doses of 10 mg/kg intravenous ipilimumab, one every 3 weeks. Individuals who were clinically stable at week 24 were eligible to receive 10 mg/kg intravenous ipilimumab every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with disease control, defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease after 12 weeks, assessed with modified WHO criteria. Analyses of safety and efficacy included all treated patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00623766.

FINDINGS

We enrolled 72 patients: 51 into cohort A and 21 into cohort B. After 12 weeks, nine patients in cohort A exhibited disease control (18%, 95% CI 8-31), as did one patient in cohort B (5%, 0·1-24). When the brain alone was assessed, 12 patients in cohort A (24%, 13-38) and two in cohort B (10%, 1-30) achieved disease control. We noted disease control outside of the brain in 14 patients (27%, 16-42) in cohort A and in one individual (5%, 0·1-24) in cohort B. The most common grade 3 adverse events in cohort A were diarrhoea (six patients [12%]) and fatigue (six [12%]); in cohort B, they were dehydration (two individuals [10%]), hyperglycaemia (two [10%]), and increased concentrations of serum aspartate aminotransferase (two [10%]). One patient in each cohort had grade 4 confusion. The most common grade 3 immune-related adverse events were diarrhoea (six patients [12%]) and rash (one [2%]) in cohort A, and rash (one individual [5%]) and increased concentrations of serum aspartate aminotransferase (two [10%]) in cohort B. One patient in cohort A died of drug-related complications of immune-related colitis.

INTERPRETATION

Ipilimumab has activity in some patients with advanced melanoma and brain metastases, particularly when metastases are small and asymptomatic. The drug has no unexpected toxic effects in this population.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Drug-related pneumonitis in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with temsirolimus

PURPOSE

Pneumonitis has occurred in patients treated with inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). In a phase III study of patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis, advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARCC), the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus improved survival compared with interferon. We performed a retrospective, independent, blinded radiographic review of chest computed tomography (CT) images of patients in this study to characterize temsirolimus-related pneumonitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with intravenous temsirolimus 25 mg once weekly or subcutaneous interferon alfa 3 million units, with an increase to 18 million units, thrice weekly. Drug-related pneumonitis was identified based on sequential chest CT images, required every 8 weeks, showing changes consistent with pneumonitis and not pneumonia (infection) or disease progression as correlated with clinical data. Cumulative probability of drug-related pneumonitis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Eight (6%) of 138 and 52 (29%) of 178 evaluable patients on interferon and temsirolimus treatment, respectively, developed radiographically identified drug-related pneumonitis. Time to onset of pneumonitis was significantly shorter on the temsirolimus arm than on the interferon arm (log-rank P < .001). Estimated cumulative probability of pneumonitis at 8 and 16 weeks from first dose was 21% and 31%, respectively, on the temsirolimus arm and 6% and 8%, respectively, on the interferon arm. Respiratory symptoms were observed around time of onset of radiographically diagnosed temsirolimus-related pneumonitis in 16 (31%) of 52 patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ARCC receiving temsirolimus should be monitored closely for development of pneumonitis, and their management should be altered if clinical symptoms appear.

A dose-escalation study of recombinant human interleukin-18 using two different schedules of administration in patients with cancer

PURPOSE

Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is an immunostimulatory cytokine with antitumor activity in preclinical models. A phase I study of recombinant human IL-18 (rhIL-18) was done to determine the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biological activities of rhIL-18 administered at different doses in two different schedules to patients with advanced cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cohorts of three to four patients were given escalating doses of rhIL-18 as a 2-h i.v. infusion either on 5 consecutive days repeated every 28 days (group A) or once a week (group B) for up to 6 months. Toxicities were graded using standard criteria. Blood samples were obtained for safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic measurements.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (10 melanoma and 9 renal cell cancer) were given rhIL-18 in doses of 100, 500, or 1,000 microg/kg (group A) or 100, 1,000, or 2,000 microg/kg (group B). Common side effects included chills, fever, headache, fatigue, and nausea. Common laboratory abnormalities included transient, asymptomatic grade 1 to 3 lymphopenia, grade 1 to 4 hyperglycemia, grade 1 to 2 anemia, neutropenia, hypoalbuminemia, liver enzyme elevations, and serum creatinine elevations. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Biological effects of rhIL-18 included transient lymphopenia and increased expression of activation antigens on lymphocytes. Increases in serum concentrations of IFN-gamma, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and IL-18-binding protein were observed following dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

rhIL-18 can be given in biologically active doses by either weekly infusions or daily infusions for 5 days repeated every 28 days to patients with advanced cancer. Toxicity was generally mild to moderate, and a maximum tolerated dose of rhIL-18 by either schedule was not determined.

Urticaria and angioedema in renal cell cancer patients treated with IL-2

Interleukin-2 therapy has produced significant improvement in a proportion of patients with renal cell cancer. Dermatologic side effects, such as erythema, have been very common. However, we could find only 2 reports of urticaria in the medical literature. Here, we report 8 patients with renal cell cancer who developed urticaria in association with interleukin-2 therapy. The hives tended to occur at the end of a treatment cycle. Skin tests with IL-2 were negative in two patients. Urticaria did not worsen or consistently occur with repeated courses of interleukin-2 and anaphylaxis was not observed in any patient. Six of the 8 patients previously had urticaria unrelated to IL-2 therapy.

Interleukins 18 and 21: biology, mechanisms of action, toxicity, and clinical activity

Interleukins 18 and 21 have been described, and the effect of each upon immune response and experimental tumors in animals has been the subject of much recent work. Both interleukins have shown antitumor effects in animals, which in some models are striking for their duration, specificity, and ability to protect against rechallenge with the same tumor. These characteristics suggest immunologic involvement in the antitumor response, and several papers suggest involvement of both innate and adaptive immune mechanisms. Recent early phase I clinical trials in human cancer patients have demonstrated evidence of clinical response. This review discusses the biology, preclinical animal tumor model data, and early clinical trial findings.

Pegylated Arginine Deiminase Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma: Results From Phase I and II Studies

Purpose

Individuals with metastatic melanoma have a poor prognosis. Many human melanomas are auxotrophic for arginine, and arginine is not an essential amino acid in humans. We hypothesized that this auxotrophy may be therapeutically exploited. A novel amino acid–degrading enzyme (arginine deiminase) conjugated to polyethylene glycol (ADI-SS PEG 20,000 mw) was used to lower plasma arginine in individuals with metastatic melanoma.

Patients and Methods

Two cohort dose-escalation studies were performed. A phase I study in the United States enrolled 15 patients, and a phase I to II study in Italy enrolled 24 patients. The Italian patients also received two subsequent cycles of treatment, each consisting of four once-weekly injections of 160 U/m2. The goals of these studies were to determine pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and the antitumor activity of ADI-SS PEG 20,000 mw.

Results

PK and PD studies indicated that a dose of 160 U/m2 lowered plasma arginine from a resting level of approximately 130 μmol/L to less than 2 μmol/L for at least 7 days; nitric oxide levels also were lowered. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities directly attributable to the drug. Six of 24 phase I to II patients responded to treatment (five partial responses and one complete response; 25% response rate) and also had prolonged survival.

Conclusion

Elimination of all detectable plasma arginine in patients with metastatic melanoma was well tolerated and may be effective in the treatment of this cancer. Further testing of ADI-SS PEG 20,000 mw in a larger population of individuals with metastatic melanoma is warranted.

Increased disease activity in a patient with sarcoidosis after high dose interleukin 2 treatment for metastatic renal cancer

Sarcoidosis is a disease of unknown aetiology in which cytokines such as interleukin 2 (IL-2) are thought to play an important role. We present the case history of a 48 year old man with sarcoidosis who received treatment with high dose IL-2 for metastatic renal cell cancer, following which he developed hypercalcaemia characterised by a raised level of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-(OH)2-D3), a finding consistent with sarcoidosis associated hypercalcaemia. The increased activity in his sarcoidosis following IL-2 treatment provides direct supportive evidence for the role of IL-2 in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis.

Randomized Phase III Trial of High-Dose Interleukin-2 Versus Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 and Interferon in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

The Cytokine Working Group conducted a randomized phase III trial to determine the value of outpatient interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2b (IFN) relative to high-dose (HD) IL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Patients were stratified for bone and liver metastases, primary tumor in place, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and then randomly assigned to receive either IL-2 (5 MIU/m2 subcutaneously every 8 hours for three doses on day 1, then daily 5 days/wk for 4 weeks) and IFN (5 MIU/m2 subcutaneously three times per week for 4 weeks) every 6 weeks or HD IL-2 (600,000 U/kg/dose intravenously every 8 hours on days 1 through 5 and 15 to 19 [maximum 28 doses]) every 12 weeks.

Results

One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled between April 1997 and July 2000. Toxicities were as anticipated for these regimens. The response rate was 23.2% (22 of 95 patients) for HD IL-2 versus 9.9% (nine of 91 patients) for IL-2/IFN (P = .018). Ten patients receiving HD IL-2 were progression-free at 3 years versus three patients receiving IL-2 and IFN (P = .082). The median response durations were 24 and 15 months (P = .18), and median survivals were 17.5 and 13 months (P = .24). For patients with bone or liver metastases (P = .001) or a primary tumor in place (P = .040), survival was superior with HD IL-2.

Conclusion

This randomized phase III trial provides additional evidence that HD IL-2 should remain the preferred therapy for selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.