Aspirin vs Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: The Alliance A011502 Randomized Trial

Importance

Observational studies of survivors of breast cancer and prospective trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease suggest improved breast cancer survival among aspirin users, but prospective studies of aspirin to prevent breast cancer recurrence are lacking.

Objective

To determine whether aspirin decreases the risk of invasive cancer events among survivors of breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A011502, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted in the United States and Canada with 3020 participants who had high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, enrolled participants from 534 sites from January 6, 2017, through December 4, 2020, with follow-up to March 4, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized (stratified for hormone receptor status [positive vs negative], body mass index [≤30 vs >30], stage II vs III, and time since diagnosis [<18 vs ≥18 months]) to receive 300 mg of aspirin (n = 1510) or placebo once daily (n = 1510) for 5 years.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival. Overall survival was a key secondary outcome.

Results

A total of 3020 participants were randomized when the data and safety monitoring committee recommended suspending the study at the first interim analysis because the hazard ratio had crossed the prespecified futility bound. By median follow-up of 33.8 months (range, 0.1-72.6 months), 253 invasive disease-free survival events were observed (141 in the aspirin group and 112 in the placebo group), yielding a hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% CI, 0.99-1.63; P = .06). All invasive disease-free survival events, including death, invasive progression (both distant and locoregional), and new primary events, were numerically higher in the aspirin group, although the differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.82-1.72). Rates of grades 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both groups.

Conclusion and Relevance

Among participants with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, daily aspirin therapy did not improve risk of breast cancer recurrence or survival in early follow-up. Despite its promise and wide availability, aspirin should not be recommended as an adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02927249.

A Genomically and Clinically Annotated Patient-Derived Xenograft Resource for Preclinical Research in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are an effective preclinical in vivo platform for testing the efficacy of novel drugs and drug combinations for cancer therapeutics. Here we describe a repository of 79 genomically and clinically annotated lung cancer PDXs available from The Jackson Laboratory that have been extensively characterized for histopathologic features, mutational profiles, gene expression, and copy-number aberrations. Most of the PDXs are models of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including 37 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 33 lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) models. Other lung cancer models in the repository include four small cell carcinomas, two large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, two adenosquamous carcinomas, and one pleomorphic carcinoma. Models with both de novo and acquired resistance to targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors are available in the collection. The genomic profiles of the LUAD and LUSC PDX models are consistent with those observed in patient tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas and previously characterized gene expression-based molecular subtypes. Clinically relevant mutations identified in the original patient tumors were confirmed in engrafted PDX tumors. Treatment studies performed in a subset of the models recapitulated the responses expected on the basis of the observed genomic profiles. These models therefore serve as a valuable preclinical platform for translational cancer research.

SIGNIFICANCE

Patient-derived xenografts of lung cancer retain key features observed in the originating patient tumors and show expected responses to treatment with standard-of-care agents, providing experimentally tractable and reproducible models for preclinical investigations.

Triplet Therapy, Transplantation, and Maintenance until Progression in Myeloma

BACKGROUND

In patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, the effect of adding autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to triplet therapy (lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [RVD]), followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until disease progression, is unknown.

METHODS

In this phase 3 trial, adults (18 to 65 years of age) with symptomatic myeloma received one cycle of RVD. We randomly assigned these patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive two additional RVD cycles plus stem-cell mobilization, followed by either five additional RVD cycles (the RVD-alone group) or high-dose melphalan plus ASCT followed by two additional RVD cycles (the transplantation group). Both groups received lenalidomide until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or both. The primary end point was progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Among 357 patients in the RVD-alone group and 365 in the transplantation group, at a median follow-up of 76.0 months, 328 events of disease progression or death occurred; the risk was 53% higher in the RVD-alone group than in the transplantation group (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.91; P<0.001); median progression-free survival was 46.2 months and 67.5 months. The percentage of patients with a partial response or better was 95.0% in the RVD-alone group and 97.5% in the transplantation group (P = 0.55); 42.0% and 46.8%, respectively, had a complete response or better (P = 0.99). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 78.2% and 94.2%, respectively; 5-year survival was 79.2% and 80.7% (hazard ratio for death, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with multiple myeloma, RVD plus ASCT was associated with longer progression-free survival than RVD alone. No overall survival benefit was observed. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; DETERMINATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01208662.).

A randomized phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (A011502): The Aspirin after Breast Cancer (ABC) Trial

360922

Background: In-vitro and in-vivo evidence suggests that aspirin may have an anti-tumor effect. Multiple epidemiologic studies have reported improved breast cancer survival among regular aspirin users compared to non-users. Pooled data from randomized trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease have also reported a decreased risk of metastatic cancer among aspirin users. Thus, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the true benefits and risks of adjuvant aspirin therapy for breast cancer survivors. Methods: The primary objective was to compare the effect of 300 mg aspirin daily versus placebo upon invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients with high-risk, HER2-negative breast cancer. Secondary objectives included effects on overall survival, cardiovascular disease, toxicity, and adherence. Eligible participants included patients aged 18-70 diagnosed with a primary invasive HER2-negative breast cancer. If hormone receptor (HR)–positive, tumors needed to be node positive and diagnosed within the past 10 years. If HR negative, tumors could be node positive or T2-4N0 and diagnosed within the past 18 months. Participants were randomly selected (1:1) to aspirin 300 mg versus placebo daily for 5 years in a double-blinded fashion. Stratification factors include HR status (positive vs. negative), body mass index (< or ≥ 30 kg/m2), and stage (II vs. III). Based upon an accrual goal of 2,936 patients to reach 381 iDFS events, the study was estimated to have 80% power to detect HR 0.75. Results: From January 2017 to December 2020, 3,021 participants were enrolled. Treatment arms were well balanced in terms of key characteristics. In November 2021, the Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended that the trial be unblinded because the stratified hazard ratio had crossed a pre-specified futility boundary. After 191 iDFS events (aspirin: 107, placebo: 84) and median follow-up of 20 months, the stratified hazard ratio comparing aspirin to placebo was 1.27 (z-score: -1.64), which is greater than the pre-specified hazard ratio of futility 1.03 (z-score < -0.192). There was no difference in the frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events by study arm. Compliance was high and similar across arms. Non-protocol use of aspirin/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was similar across arms and less than 14%, consistent with prior randomized aspirin trials. Updated results on iDFS events will be provided at presentation. Conclusions: In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, there was no benefit in breast cancer invasive disease-free survival with the addition of 300 mg aspirin daily. Although inflammation may still play a role in cancer progression, aspirin is not recommended for prevention of breast cancer recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT02927249.

Perceptions of patients with early stage breast cancer toward research biopsies

Background

The objective of this study was to describe the perspective of patients with early breast cancer toward research biopsies. The authors hypothesized that more patients at academic sites than at community‐based sites would be willing to consider these procedures.

Methods

In total, 198 patients with early stage breast cancer were recruited from 3 academic centers (n = 102) and from 1 community oncology practice (n = 96). The primary objective was to compare the proportion of patients willing to consider donating excess tissue biospecimens from surgery, from a clinically indicated breast biopsy, or from a research purposes‐only biopsy (RPOB) between practice types.

Results

Most patients (93% at academic sites, 94% at the community oncology site) said they would consider donating excess tissue from surgery for research. One‐half of patients from academic or community sites would consider donating tissue from a clinically indicated breast biopsy. On univariate analysis, significantly fewer patients from academic sites would consider an RPOB (22% at academic sites, 42% at the community site; P = .003); however, this difference was no longer significant on multivariate analysis (P = .96). Longer transportation times and unfavorable prior experiences were associated with less willingness to consider an RPOB on multivariate analysis. Significantly fewer patients from academic sites (14%) than from the community site (35%) would consider a research biopsy in a clinical trial (P = .04). Contributing to scientific knowledge, return of results, and a personal request by their physician were the strongest factors influencing patients' willingness to undergo research biopsies.

Conclusions

The current results rejected the hypothesis that more patients with early breast cancer at academic sites would be willing to donate tissue biospecimens for research compared with those at community oncology sites. These findings identify modifiable factors to consider in biobanking studies and clinical trials.

In this study of the willingness of patients with early stage breast cancer to consider biospecimen collection procedures for the purposes of research, most patients were willing to provide blood samples for research but were less likely to consider percutaneous breast biopsies. Longer travel time to the clinic and adverse experiences with prior biopsies, but not treatment center type (academic versus community‐based center), were associated with less willingness to consider research biopsies.

Randomized phase III trial of eribulin (E) versus standard weekly paclitaxel (P) as first- or second-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

1016

Background: The ph III EMBRACE trial of E vs physician’s choice of tx led to FDA approval of E as ≥3rd-line tx for MBC pts with prior exposure to anthracyclines/taxanes. The ph III BOLD 301 trial of E vs capecitabine in advanced BC treated with anthracyclines/taxanes showed a nonsignificant trend to improved median OS for all pts; pre-planned analysis by HER2 status revealed a nominally significant benefit for HER2- pts. Methods: RU011201I is an investigator initiated ph III trial with 1:1 randomization to E (1.4 mg/m2 D1,8 q21days) vs P (90 mg/m2 D1,8,15 q28days) within strata defined by (neo)adjuvant taxanes (yes/no), HR status (+/-), and line of tx (1st/2nd). Pts had measurable or non-measurable disease by RECIST v1.1; new or progressive mets; peripheral neuropathy (PN) gr<2; ≤1 prior chemotx regimens for advanced or MBC. Asymptomatic brain mets with stable MRIs for >3 mos were allowed. (Neo)adjuvant taxanes were allowed if >12 mos between tx completion and disease recurrence. Radiographic studies occur q12wks. Survival data are collected q12wks after the Off-Tx Visit. Pts reported side effects weekly; post-baseline symptomatic AE rates worse than baseline were compared between arms using Fisher’s exact tests. We report clinical outcomes and the primary objective related to PRO-CTCAE use. Results: 201 pts enrolled 3/2014 - 5/2018 with 33.8 mos median f/u; 3 are on tx as of 2/20/20 (1E, 2P). Pt characteristics were the same between E vs P: median age 62 yrs (range 27-85); 42% prior taxane; 78% ER+; 70% starting 1st line tx. Baseline lesion distribution was similar except for lung mets (37E, 53P). No difference was seen between E vs P in PFS (5.7 vs 5.9 mos; P=0.72), OS (18.1 vs 16.4 mos; P=0.75), TTF (5.3 vs 4.9 mos; P=0.82), DOR (10.8 vs 12.3 mos; P=0.84), or number of metastatic events (55 vs 54). 37E and 36P pts required ≥1 dose reduction. Hematologic toxicities ≥ gr 3 were higher with E (40 vs 22%). PN events were similar: 56 vs 58 total, 4 vs 7 motor, 52 vs 51 sensory. Median duration of PN and median time to 1st PN event were 74 vs 140 and 56 vs 41 days. Worsened numbness/tingling severity and other pt-reported AE rates were similar, but worsened numbness/tingling interference (63% vs 78%, P=0.04) and vomiting frequency (35% vs 57%, P=0.005) were lower with E. Conclusions: Clinical outcomes were equivalent with E vs P as 1st/2nd line tx for HER2- advanced BC. The nature and severity of PN were similar between arms, but time of onset, duration, and interference with daily living favor E. E may be a suitable treatment option in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02037529 .

ABC trial (A011502): A randomized phase III double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of aspirin as adjuvant therapy breast cancer

TPS600

Background: In-vitro and in-vivo evidence suggest that aspirin may have an anti-tumor effect. Multiple epidemiologic studies have reported improved breast cancer survival among regular aspirin users compared to non-users. Pooled data from randomized trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease have also reported a decreased risk of metastatic cancer among aspirin users. However, the exact benefits and risks for breast cancer survivors need to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial. Even if the clinical effect were modest, the global impact would be substantial since aspirin is inexpensive and widely available. Methods: The primary objective is to compare the effect of 300 mg daily aspirin versus placebo upon invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in high risk HER2 negative breast cancer patients. Secondary objectives include effects on overall survival, cardiovascular disease, toxicity, and adherence. A biospecimen repository will be created for correlative analyses including tumor collection at baseline and blood and urine samples and questionnaires assessing lifestyle factors associated with inflammation (pain, sleep, stress, and depression) at baseline and 2 years. Study design: Subjects will be randomized (1:1) to aspirin 300 mg vs placebo daily for 5 years in a double-blinded fashion. Stratification factors include hormone receptor (HR) status (positive vs negative), body mass index ( < or ≥ 30 kg/m2), and stage (II vs III). Subjects will be followed every 6 six months while on study drug, then annually for 10 years. Accrual goal is 2936 patients to reach 381 iDFS events. We have 80% power to detect HR 0.75 assuming 5-year iDFS on placebo of 77%. Eligibility: Eligible subjects include patients aged 18-70 diagnosed with a primary invasive HER2 negative breast cancer. If HR positive, tumors need to be node positive and diagnosed within the past 10 years. If HR negative, tumor can be node positive or T2-4N0 within 18 months of diagnosis. Subjects who are currently anticoagulated or those with a prior history of GI bleeding, atrial fibrillation, or myocardial infarction are excluded. Subjects who regularly use aspirin (defined as ≥ 5 days per week) need to stop 30 days prior to enrollment. Updated accrual numbers will be given at the time of presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT02927249 .

Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: Update of the ASCO Endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario Guideline

PURPOSE

To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario recommendations on the Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer.

METHODS

Two phase III trials—the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) in women with hormone receptor–positive, node-negative tumors and the Microarray in Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy (MINDACT) trial—provided the evidence for this update.

UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS

Shared decision making between clinicians and patients is appropriate for adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. For patients older than age 50 years and whose tumors have Onco type DX recurrence scores less than 26, and for patients age 50 years or younger whose tumors have Onco type DX recurrence scores less than 16, there is little to no benefit from chemotherapy. Clinicians may offer endocrine therapy alone for these patients. For patients age 50 years or younger with recurrence scores of 16 to 25, clinicians may offer chemoendocrine therapy. Patients with recurrence scores greater than 30 should be considered candidates for chemoendocrine therapy. Based on informal consensus, the Panel recommends that oncologists may offer chemoendocrine therapy to patients with Onco type DX scores of 26 to 30. The MammaPrint assay could be used to guide decisions on withholding adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor–positive lymph node–negative breast cancer and in select patients with lymph node–positive cancers. In both patients with node-positive and node-negative disease, evidence of clinical utility of the MammaPrint assay was only apparent in those determined to be at high clinical risk; the Panel thus did not recommend use of MammaPrint assay in patients determined to be at low clinical risk. Remaining recommendations from the 2016 ASCO guideline endorsement are unchanged. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

ABC trial (A011502): A randomized phase III double blinded placebo controlled trial of aspirin as adjuvant therapy for node positive breast cancer

TPS586

Background: In-vitro and in-vivo evidence suggest that aspirin, an inexpensive and widely available drug may have anti-tumor activity via effects on multiple pathways. Multiple epidemiologic studies have reported improved breast cancer survival among regular aspirin users compared to non-users. Furthermore, pooled data from randomized trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease have also reported a decreased risk of metastatic cancer among aspirin users, especially metastatic adenocarcinoma (RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.35-0.75). In order for aspirin to be considered standard of care, the exact benefits and risks for breast cancer survivors need to be confirmed in a randomized trial. Methods: The primary objective is to compare the effect of aspirin versus placebo upon invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in stage II-III node-positive HER2 negative breast cancer patients. Secondary objectives include effects on overall survival and cardiovascular disease and to collect toxicity and adherence. A biospecimen repository will be created for future correlative analyses including tumor collection at baseline and blood and urine samples at baseline and 2 years. Questionnaires assessing lifestyle factors associated with inflammation (pain, sleep, stress, and depression) will also be collected at baseline and 2 years. Study design: Subjects will be randomized (1:1) to aspirin 300 mg vs placebo daily for 5 years in a double-blinded fashion. Stratification factors include hormone receptor status (positive vs negative), body mass index ( < or ≥ 30 kg/m2), and stage (II vs III).Subjects will be followed every 6 six months while on study drug and then annually until 10 years from registration. 2936 patients will be enrolled with 80% power to detect HR 0.75. Eligibility: Eligible subjects include patients aged 18-70 diagnosed with a primary invasive stage II or III node positive HER2 negative breast cancer in the past year. Patients who currently use any oral or injectable anticoagulant or those with a prior history of GI bleeding, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, or grade IV hypertension will be excluded. Patients who regular used aspirin over the past year will be excluded. Clinical trial information: NCT02927249.

Role of Patient and Disease Factors in Adjuvant Systemic Therapy Decision Making for Early-Stage, Operable Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of Cancer Care Ontario Guideline Recommendations

Purpose

An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) panel considered the Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) recommendations on the role of patient and disease factors in selecting adjuvant therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer for endorsement.

Methods

ASCO staff reviewed the CCO guideline for methodologic rigor, and an ASCO panel of content experts reviewed the content of the recommendations.

CCO Recommendations

For making decisions regarding adjuvant therapy, nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, tumor grade, and lymphovascular invasion are relevant; Oncotype DX score and Adjuvant! Online may be used as risk stratification tools; and age, menopausal status, and medical comorbidities should be considered. Chemotherapy should be considered for patients with positive lymph nodes, ER-negative disease, HER2-positive disease, Adjuvant! Online mortality greater than 10%, grade 3 lymph node–negative tumors (T > 5 mm), triple-negative (ER-negative, PgR-negative, HER2-negative) tumors, lymphovascular invasion positivity, or estimated distant relapse risk of greater than 15% at 10 years based on Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS). Chemotherapy may not be beneficial or required for small node-negative tumors (T < 5 mm) without high-risk features or for patients with HER2-negative, strongly ER-positive, and PgR-positive cancer with micrometastatic nodal disease, T less than 5 mm, or Oncotype DX RS with an estimated distant relapse risk of less than 15% at 10 years.

ASCO Panel Conclusion

The ASCO panel endorses the recommendations with minor suggested revisions and highlights three areas that warrant further consideration: tumor histology and adjuvant therapy recommendations, risk stratification tools and proposed Oncotype DX RS thresholds to guide decisions about chemotherapy, and patient factors in decision making.

Development of a collaborative improvement network by a state affiliate of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

79

Background: Participation in the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) by members of the Northern New England Oncology Society (NNECOS) has been historically low (two practices consistently participating). A survey of members identified a lack of resources (time, personnel, financial) as the principal obstacles. In alignment with NNECOS’ mission “To assure the availability of and access to high quality oncology care in our region,” NNECOS sought to determine if it could establish a Collaborative Improvement Network (CIN) in which 1) experienced practices mentor inexperienced practices in QOPI, and 2) practices benchmark results against each other, sharing best practices. Methods: Six practices from the NNECOS member states of Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont agreed to join the CIN and participate in the fall 2010 and spring 2011 QOPI data collection. Meetings were held following each QOPI data collection and blinded results were compared. High achievers on individual metrics shared their processes/tools with all the participants in the CIN. Results: To develop consistency in data collection, a joint training program for abstractors was developed. There was rapid agreement to eliminate the blinding of results, allowing candid discussions about the barriers to success and strategies for overcoming those barriers. The following tools that successful practices had used were shared: a “one page chemotherapy treatment summary,” chemotherapy consent forms, an oral chemotherapy procedure, and a “chair-side smoking cessation program.” Interventions piloted included a “hardwired chemotherapy treatment summary” and a “hardwired intervention for emotional distress.” Improvement was seen in “plan of care for severe pain” (72% to 85%), “signed consent for chemotherapy” (59% to 81%), and “infertility risk discussions” (14% to 35%). The CIN continues to operate, with 8 of the 17 practices in the three states participating. It is currently engaged in a project to implement specific performance improvement processes for end-of-life care. Conclusions: We have shown that it is possible for an ASCO State Affiliate to sponsor and develop a CIN.

President's Address: Traumatic Spondylitis

Images

Extreme Coxa Vara of Left Leg of Traumatic Origin

Images