Frequency and Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Cancer of Unknown Primary

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as a primary metastatic malignancy, in which the primary tumor remains elusive in spite of a comprehensive diagnostic workup. The frequency and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which are considered to be the source of metastasis, has not yet been systematically evaluated in CUP.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CUP according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, who presented to our clinic between July 2021 and May 2023, provided blood samples for CTC quantification using CellSearch methodology. CTC counts were correlated with demographic, clinical, and molecular data generated by comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor tissue.

RESULTS

CTCs were detected in 26% of all patients at initial presentation to our department. The highest CTC frequency was observed among patients with unfavorable CUP (35.5%), while patients with single-site/oligometastatic CUP harbored the lowest CTC frequency (11.4%). No statistically significant association between CTC positivity and the number of affected organs (P = 0.478) or disease burden (P = 0.120) was found. High CTC levels (≥5 CTCs/7.5 mL; 12/95 analyzed patients) predicted for adverse overall survival compared to negative or low CTC counts (6-months overall survival rate 90% vs 32%, log-rank P < 0.001; HR 5.43; 95% CI 2.23-13.2). CTC dynamics were also prognostic for overall survival by landmark analysis (log-rank P < 0.001, HR 10.2, 95% CI 1.95-52.9).

CONCLUSIONS

CTC frequency is a strong, independent predictor of survival in patients with CUP. CTC quantification provides a useful prognostic tool in the management of these patients.

Baseline mutational profiles of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary origin enrolled in the CUPISCO study

BACKGROUND

Patients with unfavorable carcinoma of unknown primary origin (CUP) have an extremely poor prognosis of ∼1 year or less, stressing the need for more tailored treatments, which are currently being tested in clinical trials. CUPISCO (NCT03498521) was a phase II randomized study of targeted therapy/cancer immunotherapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, unfavorable CUP, defined as per the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines. We present a preliminary, descriptive molecular analysis of 464 patients with stringently diagnosed, unfavorable CUP enrolled in the CUPISCO study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genomic profiling was carried out on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue to detect genomic alterations and assess tumor mutational burden and microsatellite instability.

RESULTS

Overall, ∼32% of patients carried a potentially targetable genomic alteration, including PIK3CA, FGFR2, ERBB2, BRAFV600E, EGFR, MET, NTRK1, ROS1, and ALK. Using hierarchical clustering of co-mutational profiles, 10 clusters were identified with specific genomic alteration co-occurrences, with some mirroring defined tumor entities.

CONCLUSIONS

Results reveal the molecular heterogeneity of patients with unfavorable CUP and suggest that genomic profiling may be used as part of informed decision-making to identify the potential primary tumor and targeted treatment options. Whether stringently diagnosed patients with unfavorable CUP benefit from targeted therapies in a similar manner to those with matched known primaries will be a key learning from CUPISCO.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary: a phase II trial

Cancer of unknown primary has a dismal prognosis, especially following failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. 10-20% of patients have a high tumor mutational burden (TMB), which predicts response to immunotherapy in many cancer types. In this prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multicenter Phase II trial (EudraCT 2018-004562-33; NCT04131621), patients relapsed or refractory after platinum-based chemotherapy received nivolumab and ipilimumab following TMBhigh vs. TMBlow stratification. Progression-free survival (PFS) represented the primary endpoint; overall survival (OS), response rates, duration of clinical benefit and safety were the secondary endpoints. The trial was prematurely terminated in March 2021 before reaching the preplanned sample size (n = 194). Among 31 evaluable patients, 16% had a high TMB ( > 12 mutations/Mb). Overall response rate was 16% (95% CI 6-34%), with 7.7% (95% CI 1-25%) vs. 60% (95% CI 15-95%) in TMBlow and TMBhigh, respectively. Although the primary endpoint was not met, high TMB was associated with better median PFS (18.3 vs. 2.4 months) and OS (18.3 vs. 3.6 months). Severe immune-related adverse events were reported in 29% of cases. Assessing on-treatment dynamics of circulating tumor DNA using combined targeted hotspot mutation and shallow whole genome sequencing as part of a predefined exploratory analysis identified patients benefiting from immunotherapy irrespective of initial radiologic response.

[Cancer of unknown primary-The new ESMO guidelines]

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recently published extensively revised guidelines on cancer of unknown primary (CUP). The new version contains the following relevant amendments: with respect to diagnostics of CUP, the current guidelines aim for a more precise and standardized definition of CUP by establishing diagnostic algorithms. Recommendations for molecular diagnostics of cancer tissue have also been implemented. With respect to CUP classification, the favorable category has been revised. A carcinoma with immunohistochemistry typical for renal cell carcinoma (renal-like CUP) was introduced in the new definition of favorable subtypes, for which a specific treatment is indicated. Based on a newly defined oligometastatic situation a subgroup with localized cancer potentially curatively treatable with surgery and/or radiotherapy was introduced into the CUP classification. With respect to treatment of CUP, the current guidelines present options beyond empirical chemotherapy, which is still the standard of care treatment, and pinpoint indications and predictive biomarkers for targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

RELEVANT UPDATES

The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recently published extensively revised guidelines on the CUP syndrome. The new version contains the following relevant amendments: the current guidelines aim for a more precise and standardized definition of CUP by establishing diagnostic algorithms with respect to the diagnostics of CUP syndrome. Recommendations for molecular diagnostics of cancer tissue have also been implemented. The classification of the CUP syndrome has also been revised. A carcinoma with immunohistochemistry typical for renal cell carcinoma (renal-like CUP) was introduced in the new definition of favorable subtypes, for which a specific treatment is indicated. Based on a newly defined oligometastatic situation a local potentially curatively treatable with surgery and/or radiotherapy subgroup was introduced into the CUP classification. With respect to treatment of the CUP syndrome, the current guidelines present options beyond empirical chemotherapy, which is still the gold standard treatment, and pinpoint indications and predictive biomarkers for targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG

The aim of this review is to present the current state of diagnostics, classification and treatment of CUP syndrome, with a focus on recent developments and revisions implemented in the current ESMO guidelines.

[Cancer of unknown primary (CUP)-single-site, oligometastatic, and in the head and neck region]

INTRODUCTION

About 20% of all cancer of unknown primary (CUP) cases can be classified into favorable subgroups, which are defined by either obvious analogies to certain cancers with a known primary or amenability to local ablative treatment. In the updated European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CUP, the definition of favorable subgroups has been revised according to the latest scientific findings. In particular, the definition and treatment of oligometastatic CUP have undergone considerable changes in recent years. Thus, we delineate the current diagnostic and therapeutic standards for the two favorable CUP subtypes single-site/oligometastatic and head/neck CUP.

METHODS

The classification, diagnostic workup, and treatment of single-site and oligometastatic CUP are summarized based on the current ESMO and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines together with a literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-site and oligometastatic CUP is defined by the presence of a maximum of five metastases that are amenable to local ablative treatment. Median overall survival is favorable and exceeds 4 years after local ablation of all detectable metastases. Lymph node metastases in the head and neck region represent a frequent scenario of single-site CUP. They usually originate from human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated squamous cell carcinoma in the oropharynx. Diagnostic workup comprises computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) if necessary, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), followed by panendoscopy and biopsies of suspicious mucosal sites. Neck dissection, potentially followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, and definitive radiotherapy represent equally effective oncological treatment options with respect to a favorable prognosis.

Local ablative treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy in single-site and oligometastatic carcinoma of unknown primary

BACKGROUND

Single-site carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is recognised as a distinct favourable subtype in the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) classification. There is broad consensus that these patients are candidates for local ablative treatment strategies with surgery and/or radiotherapy, but data on their outcomes are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, we have addressed the prospects of cure and prognostic factors in a retrospective cohort of 63 patients who were eligible for local treatment at our centre.

RESULTS

Median event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 15.6 months and 52.5 months, respectively. Of 61 patients who received local treatment, 20 (32.8%) remained event-free over a median follow-up of 28 months. Baseline clinical parameters including affected organ, number, volume and histology of metastases had no significant impact on prognosis, whereas deleterious TP53 mutations and DNA copy number loss emerged as independent adverse risk factors with respect to EFS. Surgical treatment was associated with improved OS as compared to radiation-based therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study advocates to pursue localised treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy whenever feasible and implies that genetic parameters might additionally determine the clinical course of single-site CUP patients.

A Challenging Task: Identifying Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) According to ESMO Guidelines: The CUPISCO Trial Experience

BACKGROUND

CUPISCO is an ongoing randomized phase II trial (NCT03498521) comparing molecularly guided therapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with "unfavorable" cancer of unknown primary (CUP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with an unfavorable CUP diagnosis, as defined by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and available cancer tissue for molecular sequencing are generally eligible. Potential patients with CUP entering screening undergo a review involving reference histopathology and clinical work-up by a central eligibility review team (ERT). Patients with "favorable" CUP, a strongly suspected primary site of origin, lack of tissue, or unmet inclusion criteria are excluded.

RESULTS

As of April 30, 2020, 628 patients had entered screening and 346 (55.1%) were screen failed. Screen fails were due to technical reasons (n = 89), failure to meet inclusion and exclusion criteria not directly related to CUP diagnosis (n = 89), and other reasons (n = 33). A total of 124 (35.8%) patients were excluded because unfavorable adeno- or poorly differentiated CUP could not be confirmed by the ERT. These cases were classified into three groups ineligible because of (a) histologic subtype, such as squamous and neuroendocrine, or favorable CUP; (b) evidence of a possible primary tumor; or (c) noncarcinoma histology.

CONCLUSION

Experience with CUPISCO has highlighted challenges with standardized screening in an international clinical trial and the difficulties in diagnosing unfavorable CUP. Reconfirmation of unfavorable CUP by an ERT in a clinical trial can result in many reasons for screen failures. By sharing this experience, we aim to foster understanding of diagnostic challenges and improve diagnostic pathology and clinical CUP algorithms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A high unmet need exists for improved treatment of cancer of unknown primary (CUP); however, study in a trial setting is faced with the significant challenge of definitively distinguishing CUP from other cancer types. This article reports the authors' experience of this challenge so far in the ongoing CUPISCO trial, which compares treatments guided by patients' unique genetic signatures versus standard chemotherapy. The data presented will aid future decision-making regarding diagnosing true CUP cases; this will have far-reaching implications in the design, execution, and interpretation of not only CUPISCO but also future clinical studies aiming to find much-needed treatment strategies.

Cryostorage to What End? - Autologous Stem Cell Products in Burkitt Lymphoma, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Patients

Introduction

Recently, we identified a huge discrepancy between the collection practice and the actual utilization of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). Specifically, patients with Burkitt lymphoma, acute leukemia, and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were frequently not referred for ABSCT after successful PBSC collection.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify variables that are associated with the non-utilization of PBSC grafts.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the collection, storage, and disposal of PBSC grafts in Burkitt lymphoma (n = 18), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 22), MPN (n = 18), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 71) patients. Patients who underwent autologous PBSC collection at 2 collection and transplantation centers between 2001 and 2012 were included and followed up until 2016.

Results

None of the Burkitt lymphoma patients were referred for ABSCT. Only in 1 (6%) patient, the graft was discarded after the patient's death. In all other patients (n = 17, 94%), the grafts were stored independently of the patient's status (death, n = 4, 22%; no follow-up, n = 6, 33%; no indication for ABSCT given, n = 7, 39%). In ALL patients, 4 (18%) patients underwent ABSCT after a median follow-up of 74 (1-182) months. In the remaining patients, PBSC grafts were either discarded (8 patients, 36%) or stored until the reference date (10 patients, 45%). Seven of 18 MPN patients (39%) underwent ABSCT. ABSCT was performed in 24 (34%) AML patients. In 20 (28%) patients who were not referred to ABSCT, an allogeneic transplantation (TPL) was performed. Fifteen (21%) patients received palliative care or deceased, and their grafts were discarded in all but 1 patient. Additional grafts were discarded in 21 (31%) patients and stored in 9 (13%) patients who underwent ABSCT or allogeneic TPL (n = 44).

Conclusions

As the role and efficacy of autologous HDCT/ABSCT are not established in the analyzed entities, the indication for PBSC collection should be reanalyzed in regular intervals. Moreover, PBSC grafts from patients who have deceased, have insufficient grafts, or have already undergone an allogeneic TPL should be considered for disposal or (if applicable) for research use, to economize storage costs on a rational basis.

Risk stratification of EGFR+ lung cancer diagnosed with panel-based next-generation sequencing

OBJECTIVE

Panel-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and could improve risk assessment in combination with clinical parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To this end, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 400 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated EGFR⁺ NSCLC patients with validation of results in an independent cohort (n = 130).

RESULTS

EGFR alterations other than exon 19 deletions (non-del19), TP53 co-mutations, and brain metastases at baseline showed independent associations of similar strengths with progression-free (PFS hazard ratios [HR] 2.1-2.3) and overall survival (OS HR 1.7-2.2), in combination defining patient subgroups with distinct outcome (EGFR⁺NSCLC risk Score, "ENS", p < 0.001). Co-mutations beyond TP53 were rarely detected by our multigene panel (<5%) and not associated with clinical endpoints. Smoking did not affect outcome independently, but was associated with non-del19 EGFR mutations (p < 0.05) and comorbidities (p < 0.001). Laboratory parameters, like the blood lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio and serum LDH, correlated with the metastatic pattern (p < 0.01), but had no independent prognostic value. Reduced ECOG performance status (PS) was associated with comorbidities (p < 0.05) and shorter OS (p < 0.05), but preserved TKI efficacy. Non-adenocarcinoma histology was also associated with shorter OS (p < 0.05), but rare (2-3 %). The ECOG PS and non-adenocarcinoma histology could not be validated in our independent cohort, and did not increase the range of prognostication alongside the ENS.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR variant, TP53 status and brain metastases predict TKI efficacy and survival in EGFR⁺ NSCLC irrespective of other currently available parameters ("ENS"). Together, they constitute a practical and reproducible approach for risk stratification of newly diagnosed metastatic EGFR⁺ NSCLC.

Integrated clinicomolecular characterization identifies RAS activation and CDKN2A deletion as independent adverse prognostic factors in cancer of unknown primary

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) denotes a malignancy with histologically confirmed metastatic spread while the primary tumor remains elusive. Here, we address prognostic and therapeutic implications of mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) detected in tumor tissue in the context of a comprehensive clinical risk assessment. Targeted panel sequencing was performed in 252 CUP patients. 71.8% of patients had unfavorable CUP according to ESMO guidelines. 74.7% were adeno- and 13.7% squamous cell carcinomas. DNA was extracted from microdissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. For library preparation, mostly multiplex PCR-based Ion Torrent AmpliSeq™ technology with Oncomine comprehensive assays was used. Most frequent genetic alterations were mutations/deletions of TP53 (49.6%), CDKN2A (19.0%) and NOTCH1 (14.1%) as well as oncogenic activation of KRAS (23.4%), FGFR4 (14.9%) and PIK3CA (10.7%). KRAS activation was predominantly found in adenocarcinomas (p = 0.01), PIK3CA activation in squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.03). Male sex, high ECOG score, unfavorable CUP, higher number of involved organs and RAS activation predicted decreased event-free and overall survival in multivariate analysis. Deletions of CDKN2A were prognostically adverse regarding overall survival. TP53 mutations did not significantly influence prognosis in the overall cohort, but worsened prognosis in otherwise favorable CUP subtypes. Although not standard in CUP, for 17/198 (8.6%) patients molecularly targeted treatment was recommended and 10 patients (5.1%) were treated accordingly. In conclusion, besides the identification of drug targets, panel sequencing in CUP is prognostically relevant, with RAS activation and CDKN2A deletion emerging as novel independent risk factors in a comprehensive assessment with clinicopathological data.

TP53 deficiency permits chromosome abnormalities and karyotype heterogeneity in acute myeloid leukemia

Abnormal karyotypes are common in cancer cells and frequently observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in which complex karyotype aberrations are associated with poor prognosis. How exactly abnormal karyotypes arise and are propagated in AML is unclear. TP53 mutations and deletions are frequent in complex karyotype AML, suggesting a role of TP53 alterations in the development of chromosome abnormalities. Here, we generated isogenic TP53-knockout versions of the euploid AML cell line EEB to investigate the impact of TP53 on karyotype stability. We show that chromosome abnormalities spontaneously arise in TP53-deficient cells. Numerical aneuploidy could, to some extent, be propagated in a TP53-proficient setting, indicating that it does not necessarily trigger TP53 activation. In contrast, tolerance to structural chromosome aberrations was almost entirely restricted to TP53-knockout clones, all of which were able to continue proliferation in the presence of damaged DNA. Mechanistically, as a source of chromosome aberrations, limited numerical but not structural chromosomal instability was tolerated by TP53-wildtype cells. In contrast, structural instability was found only in TP53-knockout cells. Together, in myeloid cells TP53 loss allows for the development of complex karyotype aberrations and karyotype heterogeneity by perpetuation of chromosome segregation errors.

Hematological Malignancies in Adults With a Family Predisposition

BACKGROUND

Some hematological malignancies arise in persons with a hereditary predisposition. The hereditary nature of these diseases often goes unrecognized, particularly when symptoms begin in adulthood.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed.

RESULTS

Many rare germline mutations have been identified that lead to acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. They differ from one another with respect to their penetrance, the age of onset of disease, and the clinical manifestations. In view of this heterogeneity, no uniform recommendations have yet been formulated for their diagnosis and treatment. The most common types of hematological malig- nancy with a hereditary predisposition are traceable to an underlying disturbance of DNA damage response and repair mechanisms and to mutations of hematological transcription factors. With regard to the selection of patients for testing, the con- sensus is that cytogenetic and molecular-genetic findings that are suspect for a hereditary predisposition, such as CEBPA and RUNX1 mutations, call for further investigation, as do any clinical features that are typical of tumor syndromes, or a positive family history. The knowledge that a hereditary predisposition may be present is highly stressful for patients; testing should only be carried out after the patient has received genetic counseling. The confirmation of a germline mutation always requires a comparison with healthy tissue. A fibroblast culture is recom- mended as the gold standard for this purpose.

CONCLUSION

The detection of a hereditary predisposition to hematological neoplasia is often relevant to treatment and follow-up care: for example, it may motivate early allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Counseling, predictive testing, and follow-up care are available to the patients' relatives as well.

RAS activation and CDKN2A deletion to predict prognosis in cancer of unknown primary

e13026

Background: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) denotes a malignancy with histologically confirmed metastatic spread while the primary tumor remains elusive. Given the typically dismal response to empiric chemotherapy, the deciphering of molecular profiles holds a particular promise for targeted therapy. Here, we address the prognostic implications of mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) detected in tumor tissue in the context of a comprehensive clinical risk assessment. Methods: We performed targeted panel sequencing in a series of 252 CUP patients. Median age was 60.3 years and 59.1% were female. 71.2% of patients had unfavorable CUP. Lymph nodes, bone marrow, lung, peritoneum and pleura were the most frequent metastatic sites. Among histologic subtypes, adeno- (74.7%) and squamous cell carcinomas (13.7%) prevailed. DNA was extracted from micro-dissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. For library preparation mostly multiplex PCR-based Ion Torrent AmpliSeq technology (Life Technologies) with Oncomine comprehensive assays v1 and v3 was used. Results: The prevailing genetic alterations were deletions in tumor suppressor genes TP53 (49.6%), CDKN2A (19.0%) and NOTCH1 (14.1%) as well as oncogenic activation of KRAS (23.4%), FGFR4 (14.9%) and PIK3CA (10.7%). KRAS activation was predominantly found in adenocarcinomas (p = 0.01) and PIK3CA activation in squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.03). Regarding prognosis, male sex, high ECOG score, unfavorable CUP subtype, a higher number of involved organs as well as RAS activation predicted decreased event-free and overall survival in multivariate analysis. Deletions in CDKN2A were a poor prognostic factor regarding overall survival. Markedly, TP53 mutations did not significantly influence prognosis. Since July 2015, 17/198 (8.6%) patients received a recommendation for molecularly guided therapy. However, due to lack of coverage by insurers or rapid clinical deterioration only 7 of these patients (3.5%) actually received targeted treatment. Conclusions: Besides offering targets for therapy, targeted panel sequencing in CUP is prognostically relevant, with RAS activation and CDKNA2 deletion emerging as independent risk factors in a comprehensive assessment with clinical risk factors.

Does Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) Truly Exist as a Distinct Cancer Entity?

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) designates an enigmatic cancer entity with histologic confirmation of malignancy from a metastasis but no identifiable primary tumor in spite of a thorough diagnostic work-up. In this review, we discuss the validity of CUP as a distinct cancer entity as well as diagnostic pitfalls. As arguments against a distinct entity, the diagnosis of CUP is erroneous in some cases. Diagnostic pitfalls include incomplete diagnostics, uncertainty in classifying a lesion as either primary or metastasis and mistaking a relapse of an antecedent malignancy as CUP due to histologic and immunohistologic disparities. Given the high frequency of prior malignancies in CUP patients, relapse of an antecedent cancer should always be carefully excluded. Gene expression profiling-based classifier assays aim at aligning the molecular profile of CUP patients with established primary cancer patterns for highest congruency in order to identify the putative primary and treat accordingly. However, the spectrum of predicted putative primaries by molecular techniques is somewhat at odds with the primaries identified in autopsy series. Also, a first randomized clinical trial did not show superiority of primary-tailored therapy over unspecific platinum-based chemotherapy. CUP cases share an aggressive clinical course, atypical metastasis pattern, rapid progression of metastases, a generally poor response to chemotherapy and dismal outcome as distinct clinical features. Metastatic spread appears to take place in the early stages of tumor evolution, with CUP metastases subsequently undergoing genetic evolution toward a chromosomally highly complex and instable karyotype independent from the primary tumor. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of CUP is valid when no primary tumor is detectable. Treatment should ideally offer broad spectrum coverage across numerous malignancies and be well-established in CUP as is the case for carboplatin/paclitaxel and cisplatin / gemcitabine in particular, but it should also cover the most likely putative primary. The diligent diagnosis of CUP is warranted for clinical trials, making the eligibility process particularly laborious. In conclusion, we deem CUP a distinct cancer entity and the diagnosis accurate in most patient cases.

Comparative genetic profiling aids diagnosis and clinical decision making in challenging cases of CUP syndrome

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) denotes cancer cases where metastatic spread is histologically confirmed, but no respective primary tumor can be identified. The challenging diagnosis of CUP is further complicated in cases with previously identified malignancies or with dubious clonal relationship between metastatic sites due to ambiguous histology. Our study aims at elucidating clonal relationships by comparing the respective mutational spectra. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) employing formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue was performed on 174 consecutive CUP patients. Among these, 43/174 (24.7%) patients had a documented prior malignancy. Data on pairwise targeted NGS testing to address clonal relationships between the previous malignancy and the presumed CUP (n = 11) or between different CUP metastatic sites (n = 7) was available in 18 patients. NGS could clarify clonal relationships in 16/18 cases. Among the 11 CUP patients with antecedent malignancies, four cases were clonally independent of the previous malignancy but harbored deleterious germline mutations in BRCA/BAP1/ATM genes. Seven CUP cases were clonally related to the antecedent malignancy, changing the CUP diagnosis to relapse of the prior malignancy. In the seven CUP cases, with doubtfully related metastatic sites, NGS confirmed clonal relationship in five cases and was inconclusive in two. In conclusion, NGS proved an efficient tool to elucidate clonal relationships in clinically challenging CUP cases. Our study cautions against a premature diagnosis of CUP. Relapses of antecedent malignancies should be carefully considered. CUPs clonally independent from the antecedent malignancy should raise a red flag of a potential cancer-predisposing germline mutation.

Performance analysis of AL amyloidosis cardiac biomarker staging systems with special focus on renal failure and atrial arrhythmia

Systemic light chain amyloidosis is a rare and life-threatening disorder, for which accurate risk stratification is crucial. Current cardiac staging systems (MAYO2004, MAYO3b, and MAYO2012) are mainly based on biomarkers, which have uncertain reliability in the context of atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia or pacemaker stimulation as well as renal insufficiency. We compared the performance of the established staging systems with particular regard to these comorbidities in 1,224 patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis diagnosed at our center from July 2002 until March 2017. We first characterized the subsets with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m² (415 patients) and any kind of atrial arrhythmia (183 patients) as unique high-risk subgroups with similarly increased cardiac biomarkers (χ²-test, all P<0.001). This resulted in a shift towards higher risk stages and reduced median overall survival compared to those of patients with better kidney function or without atrial arrhythmia in univariate analyses (13 vs. 46 months and 17 vs. 53 months, respectively; both P<0.001). Performance analysis revealed that predictions in the entire cohort were least precise with the MAYO2004 staging system and most precise with the MAYO3b system. This performance pattern was almost preserved for patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m², but less so for those with atrial arrhythmias. The MAYO3b staging system was most robust. Importantly, atrial arrhythmia retained its prognostic value in multivariable analysis including age, difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains, and any staging system, while estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m² was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis with the MAYO3b staging system. In conclusion, our results favor the MAYO3b staging system due to its consistently best performance and retained applicability in the subgroups with atrial arrhythmia and estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m².

Diagnosis and management of metastatic neoplasms with unknown primary

In cancer of unknown primary (CUP), metastases are clinically and histologically confirmed, but the primary tumor site remains elusive after extensive work-up. CUPs make up for 2-3% of all epithelial malignancies. The two prevailing histologies are adenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas, whereas squamous cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas and rare histologies account for the remaining 10%. The diagnostic work-up in CUP relies strongly on a detailed immunohistological (IHC) analysis in order to characterize the tumor type, nowadays aided by molecular techniques. Diagnostics also include a thorough clinical examination, a basic lab draw with the most relevant tumor markers, and cross sectional imaging. Additional PET-CT is recommended in cervical lymph nodes suggestive of head and neck cancer and in limited metastases potentially treatable in curative intent. As for treatment, it is paramount to identify patients who fall into one of the six well defined "favorable" subset categories, namely extragonadal germ cell tumors, adenocarcinoma with isolated unilateral axillary lymph nodes in female patients, squamous cell carcinoma with neck lymph nodes, squamous cell carcinoma with inguinal lymph nodes, serous papillary peritoneal carcinomatosis in females and blastic bone metastasis in males with elevated PSA. These subsets are distinct both regarding the required treatment and the comparably favorable prognosis. Within the remaining "unfavorable" group, patients of colon and renal cancer type should be identified based on IHC and clinical picture, since the prognosis of these patients seems to improve with the use of therapy tailored to the presumed primary as well. For the few patients with limited metastases it should be assessed whether they are candidates for surgery, radiotherapy or surgery followed by irradiation in curative intent. The remaining majority of patients are treated with empiric palliative chemotherapy, typically a platinum - paclitaxel combination, though the level of evidence for this therapy recommendation is low. Gemcitabine alone or in combination can be used as an alternative. Decoding of the molecular profiles in CUP offers the prospect of targeted therapy with novel agents. However, there appears to be no uniform molecular pattern for CUP, and the observed molecular diversity thus poses a challenge to respective clinical trials.

Mesenchymal stromal cells contribute to quiescence of therapy-resistant leukemic cells in acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVE

Persistence of leukemic cells after induction therapy has been shown to correlate with poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, we tested if human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) have protective effects on leukemic cells undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Persistent disease was used as marker to identify cases with therapy-resistant leukemic cells in 95 patients with AML. Immunophenotyping, cell cycle, and apoptosis assays were assessed by flow cytometry. AML coculture studies were performed with hMSC of healthy donors.

RESULTS

Samples from patients with persistent disease had increased fractions of CD34⁺ CD38^- and quiescent leukemic cells. Comparison of sample series collected at time points of diagnosis and blast persistence showed a relative therapy resistance of quiescent leukemic cells. Consistent with these observations, relapsed disease always displayed higher proportions of quiescent cells compared to samples of first diagnosis suggesting that quiescence is an important therapy escape mechanism of resistant cells. Co-culture studies demonstrated that hMSC protect leukemic cells from the effect of AraC treatment by enriching for quiescent cells, mimicking the effects observed in patients. This effect was even detectable when no direct stromal contact was established.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that hMSC contribute to quiescence and therapy resistance of persistent AML cells.

Reduced hematopoietic stem cell frequency predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia

In patients with acute myeloid leukemia and low percentages of aldehyde-dehydrogenase-positive cells, non-leukemic hematopoietic stem cells can be separated from leukemic cells. By relating hematopoietic stem cell frequencies to outcome we detected poor overall- and disease-free survival of patients with low hematopoietic stem cell frequencies. Serial analysis of matched diagnostic and follow-up samples further demonstrated that hematopoietic stem cells increased after chemotherapy in patients who achieved durable remissions. However, in patients who eventually relapsed, hematopoietic stem cell numbers decreased dramatically at the time of molecular relapse demonstrating that hematopoietic stem cell levels represent an indirect marker of minimal residual disease, which heralds leukemic relapse. Upon transplantation in immune-deficient mice cases with low percentages of hematopoietic stem cells of our cohort gave rise to leukemic or no engraftment, whereas cases with normal hematopoietic stem cell levels mostly resulted in multi-lineage engraftment. Based on our experimental data, we propose that leukemic stem cells have increased niche affinity in cases with low percentages of hematopoietic stem cells. To validate this hypothesis, we developed new mathematical models describing the dynamics of healthy and leukemic cells under different regulatory scenarios. These models suggest that the mechanism leading to decreases in hematopoietic stem cell frequencies before leukemic relapse must be based on expansion of leukemic stem cells with high niche affinity and the ability to dislodge hematopoietic stem cells. Thus, our data suggest that decreasing numbers of hematopoietic stem cells indicate leukemic stem cell persistence and the emergence of leukemic relapse.

Lenalidomide/melphalan/dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: results of a prospective phase 2 study with long-term follow up

Chemotherapy in light chain amyloidosis aims to normalize the involved free light chain in serum, which leads to an improvement, or at least stabilization of organ function in most responding patients. We performed a prospective single center phase 2 trial with 50 untreated patients not eligible for high-dose treatment. The treatment schedule comprised 6 cycles of oral lenalidomide, melphalan and dexamethasone every 4 weeks. After 6 months, complete remission was achieved in 9 patients (18%), very good partial remission in 16 (32%) and partial response in 9 (18%). Overall, organ response was observed in 24 patients (48%). Hematologic and cardiac toxicities were predominant adverse events. Mortality at 3 months was low at 4% (n=2) despite the inclusion of 36% of patients (n=18) with cardiac stage Mayo 3. After a median follow-up of 50 months, median overall and event-free survival were 67.5 months and 25.1 months, respectively. We conclude that the treatment of lenalidomide, melphalan and dexamethasone is very effective in achieving a hematologic remission, organ response and, consecutively, a long survival in transplant ineligible patients with light chain amyloidosis. However, as toxicity and tolerability are the major problems of a 3-drug regimen, a strict surveillance program is necessary and sufficient to avoid severe toxicities. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 00883623 (Eudract2008-001405-41).

Novel recurrent chromosomal aberrations detected in clonal plasma cells of light chain amyloidosis patients show potential adverse prognostic effect: first results from a genome-wide copy number array analysis

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by the deposition of abnormal amyloid fibrils in multiple organs, thus impairing their function. In the largest cohort studied up to now of 118 CD138-purified plasma cell samples from previously untreated immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients, we assessed in parallel copy number alterations using high-density copy number arrays and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH). We used fluorescence in situ hybridization probes for the IgH translocations t(11;14), t(4;14), and t(14;16) or any other IgH rearrangement as well as numerical aberrations of the chromosome loci 1q21, 8p21, 5p15/5q35, 11q22.3 or 11q23, 13q14, 15q22, 17p13, and 19q13. Recurrent gains included chromosomes 1q (36%), 9 (24%), 11q (24%), as well as 19 (15%). Recurrent losses affected chromosome 13 (29% monosomy) and partial losses of 14q (19%), 16q (14%) and 13q (12%), respectively. In 88% of patients with translocation t(11;14), the hallmark chromosomal aberration in AL amyloidosis, a concomitant gain of 11q22.3/11q23 detected by iFISH was part of the unbalanced translocation der(14)t(11;14)(q13;q32) with the breakpoint in the CCND1/MYEOV gene region. Partial loss of chromosome regions 14q and 16q were significantly associated to gain 1q. Gain 1q21 detected by iFISH almost always resulted from a gain of the long arm of chromosome 1 and not from trisomy 1, whereas deletions on chromosome 1p were rarely found. Overall and event-free survival analysis found a potential adverse prognostic effect of concomitant gain 1q and deletion 14q as well as of deletion 1p. In conclusion, in the first whole genome report of clonal plasma cells in AL amyloidosis, novel aberrations and hitherto unknown potential adverse prognostic effects were uncovered.

Evolution of a FLT3-TKD mutated subclone at meningeal relapse in acute promyelocytic leukemia

Here, we report the case of an acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patient who—although negative for FLT3 mutations at diagnosis—developed isolated FLT3 tyrosine kinase II domain (FLT3-TKD)-positive meningeal relapse, which, in retrospect, could be traced back to a minute bone marrow subclone present at first diagnosis. Initially, the 48-yr-old female diagnosed with high-risk APL had achieved complete molecular remission after standard treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and chemotherapy according to the AIDA (ATRA plus idarubicin) protocol. Thirteen months after the start of ATRA maintenance, the patient suffered clinically overt meningeal relapse along with minute molecular traces of PML/RARA (promyelocytic leukemia/retinoic acid receptor alpha) in the bone marrow. Following treatment with arsenic trioxide and ATRA in combination with intrathecal cytarabine and methotrexate, the patient achieved a complete molecular remission in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and bone marrow, which currently lasts for 2 yr after completion of therapy. Whole-exome sequencing and subsequent ultradeep targeted resequencing revealed a heterozygous FLT3-TKD mutation in CSF leukemic cells (p.D835Y, c.2503G>T, 1000/1961 reads [51%]), which was undetectable in the concurrent bone marrow sample. Interestingly, the FLT3-TKD mutated meningeal clone originated from a small bone marrow subclone present in a variant allele frequency of 0.4% (6/1553 reads) at initial diagnosis. This case highlights the concept of clonal evolution with a subclone harboring an additional mutation being selected as the “fittest” and leading to meningeal relapse. It also further supports earlier suggestions that FLT3 mutations may play a role for migration and clonal expansion in the CSF sanctuary site.

Pretransplant NPM1 MRD levels predict outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The objective was to evaluate the prognostic impact of pre-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) as determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 67 adult NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-eight of the 67 patients had a FLT3-ITD (42%). Median age at transplantation was 54.7 years, median follow-up for survival from time of allografting was 4.9 years. At transplantation, 31 patients were in first, 20 in second complete remission (CR) and 16 had refractory disease (RD). Pre-transplant NPM1 MRD levels were measured in 39 CR patients. Overall survival (OS) for patients transplanted in CR was significantly longer as compared to patients with RD (P=0.004), irrespective of whether the patients were transplanted in first or second CR (P=0.74). There was a highly significant difference in OS after allogeneic HSCT between pre-transplant MRD-positive and MRD-negative patients (estimated 5-year OS rates of 40 vs 89% P=0.007). Multivariable analyses on time to relapse and OS revealed pre-transplant NPM1 MRD levels >1% as an independent prognostic factor for poor survival after allogeneic HSCT, whereas FLT3-ITD had no impact. Notably, outcome of patients with pre-transplant NPM1 MRD positivity >1% was as poor as that of patients transplanted with RD.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Survival in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Characterized by a High Allelic Ratio of Mutant FLT3-ITD

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) as a postremission therapy in patients with FLT3-ITD-positive intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial. FLT3-ITD mutations are heterogeneous with respect to allelic ratio, location, and length of the insertion, with a high mutant-to-wild-type ratio consistently associated with inferior prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the role of alloHCT in first remission in relationship to the allelic ratio and presence or absence of nucleophosmin 1 mutations (NPM1) in the Study Alliance Leukemia AML2003 trial. FLT3-ITD mutations were detected in 209 patients and concomitant NPM1 mutations in 148 patients. Applying a predefined cutoff ratio of .8, AML was grouped into high- and low-ratio FLT3-ITD AML (HR(FLT3-ITD) and LR(FLT3-ITD)). Sixty-one patients (29%) were transplanted in first remission. Overall survival (OS) (HR, .3; 95% CI, .16 to .7; P = .004) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR, .4; 95% CI, .16 to .9; P = .02) were significantly increased in patients with HR(FLT3-ITD) AML who received alloHCT as consolidation treatment compared with patients who received consolidation chemotherapy. Patients with LR(FLT3-ITD) AML and wild-type NPM1 who received alloHCT in first remission had increased OS (HR, .3; 95% CI, .1 to .8; P = .02) and EFS (HR, .2; 95% CI, .1 to .8; P = .02), whereas alloHCT in first remission did not have a significant impact on OS and EFS in patients with LR(FLT3-ITD) AML and concomitant NPM1 mutation. In conclusion, our results provide additional evidence that alloHCT in first remission improves EFS and OS in patients with HR(FLT3-ITD) AML and in patients with LR(FLT3-ITD) AML and wild-type NPM1.

Translocation t(11;14) Is Associated With Adverse Outcome in Patients With Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloidosis When Treated With Bortezomib-Based Regimens

Purpose

Bortezomib has become a cornerstone in the treatment of AL amyloidosis. In this study, we addressed the prognostic impact of cytogenetic aberrations for bortezomib-treated patients.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed a consecutive series of 101 patients with AL amyloidosis treated with bortezomib-dexamethasone as first-line treatment by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH). Patients were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy, which would put them at risk for cardiac or renal failure, and thus represented a poor-risk group.

Results

Presence of t(11;14), versus its absence, was associated with inferior hematologic event-free survival (median, 3.4 v 8.8 months, respectively; P = .002), overall survival (median, 8.7 v 40.7 months, respectively; P = .05), and remission rate (≥ very good partial remission; 23% v 47%, respectively; P = .02). In multivariable Cox regression models incorporating established hematologic and clinical risk factors, t(11;14) was an independent adverse prognostic marker for hematologic event-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.37 to 6.25; P = .006) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.16 to 8.33; P = .03), but not for remission (≥ very good partial remission). Markedly, the multiple myeloma high-risk iFISH aberrations t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p), and gain of 1q21 conferred no adverse prognosis in this bortezomib-dexamethasone–treated group. After backward variable selection, the final multivariable model was validated in a consecutive series of 32 patients treated with bortezomib, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide.

Conclusion

iFISH results are important independent prognostic factors in AL amyloidosis. In contrast to our recently published results with melphalan and dexamethasone standard therapy, bortezomib is less beneficial to patients harboring t(11;14), whereas it effectively alleviates the poor prognosis inherent to high-risk aberrations. Given the discrepant response to different treatment modalities, iFISH may help to guide therapeutic choices in these poor-risk patients requiring rapid hematologic response.

Role of chromosomal aberrations in clonal diversity and progression of acute myeloid leukemia

Genetic abnormalities are a hallmark of cancer. Hereby, cytogenetic aberrations and small-scale abnormalities, such as single-nucleotide variations and insertion/deletion mutations, have emerged as two alternative modes of genetic diversification. Both mechanisms are at work in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in which conventional karyotyping and molecular studies demonstrate that gene mutations occur predominantly in cytogenetically normal AML, whereas chromosomal changes are a driving force of development and progression of disease in aberrant karyotype AML. All steps of disease evolution in AML, ranging from the transformation of preleukemic clones into overt leukemia to the expansion and recurrence of malignant clones, are paralleled by clonal evolution at either the gene mutation or chromosome aberration level. Preleukemic conditions, such as Fanconi anemia and Bloom syndrome, demonstrate that the acquisition of chromosomal aberrations can contribute to leukemic transformation. Similar to what has been shown at the mutational level, expansion and recurrence of AML clones goes along with increasing genetic diversification. Hereby, cytogenetically more evolved subclones are at a proliferative advantage and outgrow ancestor clones or have evolved toward a more aggressive behavior with additional newly acquired aberrations as compared with the initial leukemic clone, respectively.

Gain of chromosome 1q21 is an independent adverse prognostic factor in light chain amyloidosis patients treated with melphalan/dexamethasone

Chromosomal aberrations of plasma cells are well established pathogenetic and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma, but their prognostic implication in systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify prognostic cytogenetic risk factors by interphase FISH in a series of 103 consecutive AL amyloidosis patients treated uniformly with melphalan/dexamethasone as first-line therapy. Detection of gain of 1q21 was predictive for a poor overall survival (OS) (median 12.5 versus 38.2 months, p = 0.002). Hematologic event free survival (hem EFS) for gain of 1q21 was 5.0 versus 8.5 months in median (p = 0.08) and haematologic remission rates (≥VGPR) after three cycles were 5% versus 25% (p = 0.06). Most important, in multivariate concordance analyses the adverse prognosis carried by gain of 1q21 was retained as an independent prognostic factor (OS: p = 0.003, average hazard ratio (AHR) = 3.64, hemEFS: p = 0.008, AHR = 2.35), along with the well established Mayo cardiac staging. Patients with t(11;14) had a longer median OS with 38.2 months versus 17.5 months, though no statistical significance was reached. Deletion 13q14 and hyperdiploidy turned out to be prognostically neutral. In conclusion, we have identified gain of 1q21 as an independent adverse prognostic factor in AL amyloidosis patients treated with standard chemotherapy.

Clonal heterogeneity as detected by metaphase karyotyping is an indicator of poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), studies based on whole-genome sequencing have shown genomic diversity within leukemic clones. The aim of this study was to address clonal heterogeneity in AML based on metaphase cytogenetics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This analysis included all patients enrolled onto two consecutive, prospective, randomized multicenter trials of the Study Alliance Leukemia. Patients were newly diagnosed with non-M3 AML and were fit for intensive chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Cytogenetic subclones were detected in 418 (15.8%) of 2,639 patients from the whole study population and in 418 (32.8%) of 1,274 patients with aberrant karyotypes. Among those, 252 karyotypes (60.3%) displayed a defined number of distinct subclones, and 166 (39.7%) were classified as composite karyotypes. Subclone formation was particularly frequent in the cytogenetically adverse group, with subclone formation in 69.0%, 67.1%, and 64.8% of patients with complex aberrant, monosomal, and abnl(17p) karyotypes (P < .001 each). Two-subclone patterns typically followed a mother-daughter evolution, whereas for ≥ three subclones, a branched pattern prevailed. In non-core binding factor AML, subclone formation was associated with inferior event-free and overall survival and was confirmed as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis showed that subclone formation adds prognostic information particularly in the cytogenetic adverse-risk group. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation improved the prognosis of patients with subclone karyotypes as shown in landmark analyses.

CONCLUSION

Cytogenetic subclones are frequent in AML and permit tracing of clonal evolution and architecture. They bear prognostic significance with clonal heterogeneity as an independent adverse prognostic marker in cytogenetically adverse-risk AML.

[Current diagnostic and therapy of light chain amyloidosis]

Amyloidoses are protein-folding disorders in which soluble proteins are deposited as insoluble fibrillar aggregates due to a change in protein conformation. This might occur intra- or extracellularly, systemically or in a localized manner. The light chain type is the most common form of systemic amyloidoses and has the worst prognosis. The underlying disease is a monoclonal, mostly non-malignant plasma cell disorder. The causative treatment is the reduction of the amyloidogenic light chains with conventional or high-dose chemotherapy. Meanwhile, the"new drugs" used in multiple myeloma are also successfully applied. Early diagnosis is important to be able to treat patients effectively and to avoid further deterioration of organ function. Patients with newly diagnosed amyloidosis should be referred to a specialized center for consultation, diagnosis and treatment recommendation.

DNA damage-induced accumulation of centrosomal Chk1 contributes to its checkpoint function

The checkpoint kinase Chk1 is an established transducer of ATR- and ATM-dependent signalling in response to DNA damage. In addition to its nuclear localization, Chk1 localizes to interphase centrosomes and thereby negatively regulates entry into mitosis by preventing premature activation of cyclin B-Cdk1 during unperturbed cell cycles. Here, we demonstrate that DNA damage caused by ultraviolet irradiation or hydroxyurea treatment leads to centrosomal accumulation of endogenous Chk1 in normal human BJ fibroblasts and in ATR- or ATM-deficient fibroblasts. Chemical inhibition of ATR/ATM by caffeine led to enhanced centrosomal Chk1 deposition associated with nuclear Chk1 depletion. In contrast to normal or ATM-deficient fibroblasts, genetically ATR-deficient Seckel-fibroblasts showed detectable constitutive centrosomal accumulation of Chk1 even in the absence of exogenous insults. After DNA damage, the centrosomal fraction of Chk1 was found to be phosphorylated at ATR/ATM phosphorylation sites. Forced immobilization of kinase-inactive but not wild-type Chk1 to centrosomes resulted in a G2/M checkpoint defect. Finally, both DNA damage, and forced centrosomal expression of Chk1 in the absence of genotoxic treatments induced centrosome amplification in a subset of cells, a phenomenon which could be suppressed by inhibition of ATM/ATR-mediated signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that accumulation of phosphorylated Chk1 at centrosomes constitutes an additional element in the DNA damage response. Centrosomal Chk1 induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and may evoke centrosome amplification, the latter possibly providing a backup mechanism for elimination of cells with impaired DNA damage checkpoints operating earlier during the cell cycle.