I saw Medusa's head sign and turned to stone

Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are characterized by many radially oriented medullary veins surrounding a central draining vessel. When the imaging plane is perpendicular to the central vessel, these medullary veins resemble Medusa's head of snakes. Medusa's head sign, or caput medusae, can be appreciated on contrast enhanced CT scans and MRIs of the brain and is highly indicative of a DVA.

External Ventricular Drains versus Intraparenchymal Pressure Monitors in the Management of Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Experience at Two Academic Centers over a Decade

OBJECTIVE

The choice between external ventricular drain (EVD) and intraparenchymal monitor (IPM) for managing intracranial pressure in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with receiving EVD versus IPM and to compare outcomes and clinical management between EVD and IPM patients.

METHODS

Adult msTBI patients at 2 similar academic institutions were identified. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with receiving EVD versus IPM (model 1) and to compare EVD versus IPM in relation to patient outcomes after controlling for potential confounders (model 2), through odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of 521 patients, 167 (32.1%) had EVD and 354 (67.9%) had IPM. Mean age, sex, and Injury Severity Score were comparable between groups. Epidural hemorrhage (EDH) (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.85), greater midline shift (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98), and the hospital with higher volume (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.22) were independently associated with lower odds of receiving an EVD whereas patients needing a craniectomy were more likely to receive an EVD (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.12-3.73). EVD patients received more intense medical treatment requiring hyperosmolar therapy compared to IPM patients (64.1% vs. 40.1%). No statistically significant differences were found in patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

While EDH, greater midline shift, and hospital with larger patient volume were associated with receiving an IPM, the need for a craniectomy was associated with receiving an EVD. EVD patients received different clinical management than IPM patients with no significant differences in patient outcomes.

Clinical Utility of Dual Phase FDG PET for Distinguishing Tumor Progression from Radionecrosis in the Modern Era

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Dual-phase PET CT, a technique by which two PET/CT scans are taken hours apart, has previously shown utility in differentiating radionecrosis (RN) from tumor progression (TP) after radiation for brain metastases. We sought to validate the utility of this technique in an independent, contemporary patient cohort. Understanding the difficulty of validation without the gold standard of pathologic confirmation in a majority of cases, we hypothesized that a dual-phase PET/CT indicating likely RN would correlate with improved overall survival (OS).

MATERIALS/METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who received dual-phase FDG-PET between April 2015 and January 2023 at a single center for the purpose of distinguishing RN from TP in brain metastases previously treated with radiation. Scans were classified as indicating likely RN (dpPET-RN), likely TP (dpPET-TP), or unclear (dpPET-Unc) based on final radiology report. A Kaplan Meier (K-M) analysis was performed to evaluate differences in survival among the different dual-phase PET finding categories. An alpha level of 0.05 in the log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

We identified 36 patients who met inclusion criteria. All patients had received prior radiation - stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or both- to the lesion, and 21 (58%) had received surgery at some point prior to the dual phase PET CT. One patient received brachytherapy. Median time from the most recent course of radiation until dual-phase PET was 294 days, while median time from most recent surgery to dual-phase PET was 379 days. 14/36 (39%) of scans were called as dpPET-TP,15/36 (42%) were dpPET-RN, and 7/36 (19%) were dpPET-Unc. There were 10 cases where pathology was available after subsequent resection of the lesion. Five of the 10 path reports were concordant with the dual phase PET read, 5 were discordant. On K-M, median survival was 11 months (95% CI: 7.8 to 14.2 months) for dpPET-TP patients, 18 months (95% CI: 7.9 to 33.5 months) for dpPET-RN, and 12 months (95% CI: 0.0 to 51.2 months) for dpPET-Unc. On log rank testing, differences in the survival distribution for the different groups of dual-phase FDG-PET results were not statistically significant, χ2(2) = 4.085, p = .130.

CONCLUSION

Dual-phase PET CT has been proposed as a useful tool for distinguishing TP from RN after prior radiation. In the small subset of cases from our study with pathologic confirmation of outcomes, dual-phase PET failed to show high concordance with pathology. Although the dpPET-RN cohort had numerically superior OS compared to the dpPET-TP and dpPET-unc groups, this result was not statistically significant. Further independent validation of this imaging technique is warranted before it can be relied upon for routine clinical management.

Top 50 most cited articles on prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A bibliometric review

BACKGROUND

Bibliometric analysis can be used to assess the current state of the literature and publication trends on a given topic. There has not been a review of this kind on prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PAE is a relatively new and somewhat controversial treatment option for BPH. Given the novelty and controversy, there has been much research published on the topic recently.

AIM

To survey the current state of research on PAE for BPH by using bibliometric analysis to analyze the top 50 most highly cited articles.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed using the Web of Science database to identify the most cited articles published on PAE for BPH as of June 2022. Articles that did not primarily focus on PAE or BPH as an indication were eliminated. The 50 most cited articles were carried forward for analysis.

RESULTS

All but 6 articles were published in the last decade with contributions from 15 countries. Fifty-two percent of the studies had a C level of evidence. The majority were published in the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Twenty percent (n = 10) of the articles were published in urologic journals. On average, articles published in urologic journals tended to be more recent. The mean year of publication for an article in a urological journal was 2016.6 compared to 2013.9 in a non-urologic journal (P = 0.02). Seventy percent of the articles focused on clinical outcomes, while only 2% focused on practice guidelines. Self-citations accounted for 11.4 citations per article on average, corresponding to 14.7% of all citations analyzed.

CONCLUSION

The most influential papers on this topic represent a fairly recent body of work with contributions from a wide variety of countries and journals. The fact that articles in urologic journals were published significantly more recently than articles on the list in non-urologic journals may suggest that the field of urology is starting to accept PAE for a wider range of indications. Finally, while there has been much high-quality research published, more influential studies on practice guidelines and technique may be beneficial.

Retracted Covid-19 articles: significantly more cited than other articles within their journal of origin

With the expansion of research volume, coinciding with the age of the internet, the retraction of published papers from scientific journals has become crucial to preserving scientific integrity. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, both public and professional interest in scientific literature has grown as people attempt to educate themselves on the virus. The Retraction Watch Database COVID-19 blog was accessed in June and November of 2022 and analyzed to ensure articles met inclusion criteria. Articles were then accessed on Google Scholar and the Scopus database to find number of citations and SJR/CiteScore. The average SJR and CiteScore for a journal that published one of the articles was 1.531 and 7.3 respectively. The retracted articles were cited an average of 44.8 times, which was significantly higher than the average CiteScore (p = 0.01). Between June and November, retracted COVID-19 articles gained a total of 728 new citations, presence of "withdrawn" or "retracted" before article title did not affect citation rates. COPE guidelines for retraction statements were not met for 32% of articles. We believe retracted COVID-19 publications may have been more likely to include bold claims that garnered a disproportionately high amount of attention within the scientific community. Additionally, we found many journals were not forthright with explanations for why articles had been retracted. Retractions could be a tool used to add to the scientific discourse, but currently we are only getting half the data, the what and not the why.

Report of a rare testicular teratoid Wilms Tumor in an adult patient

Although primarily a pediatric disease, nephroblastomas (also known as Wilms tumor) occur in adults at a rate of less than 0.2 cases per million per year. Rarer still are teratoid Wilms tumors, which arise from teratomas and therefore can be extrarenal. We describe the sixth recorded case of a testicular teratoid Wilms tumor in an adult patient with accompanying histological images of the specimen. Following the case, there is a brief discussion of the current literature.