Avascular osteonecrosis and accompanying anemia, leucocytosis, and decreased bone mineral density in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Avascular osteonecrosis (AVN) is a complication of renal transplantation. In this study, we present 12 cases of AVN associated with renal transplantation.

METHODS

Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with AVN (group I [GI]) were evaluated by using magnetic resonance imaging and blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, alkaline phosphatase, parathyroid hormone, and urine analysis. We evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae. All patients were treated with steroids, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil. Twenty-six RTRs (GII) without AVN were randomly selected as control subjects.

RESULTS

The mean ages of GI and GII, were 33.81 ± 6.72 and 34.00 ± 7.65 years respectively (P > .05). The mean interval between transplantation and development of AVN was 12.08 ± 6.48 months. Although levels of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, magnesium, and parathyroidhormone, as well as glucocorticoid doses in the first 12 months were similar in GI and GII, there were significant differences in serum alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin levels, and white blood cell count between GI and GII (P < .05 for each). BMD T score <-1.5 was observed in 8/9 GI and 15/26 patients in GII. All of the patients with AVN except 1, were followed with conservative measures including calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D replacement therapies, bisphosphonate, and reduced or ceased glucocorticoid treatment. Although T scores of the femoral head were similar in GI and GII, the lumbar vertebral T score was significantly lower in GI than in GII (P < .052).

CONCLUSION

AVN developed within the first year after transplantation. Decreased lumbar vertebral BMD, which can be an indicator of glucocorticoid effect, accompanied AVN in nearly all patients. Despite the absence of renal dysfunction, increased bone destruction, anemia, and leucocytosis were coincidental or accompanying findings in our patients with AVN.

Uncommon Side Effect of MMF in Renal Transplant Recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a potent immunosuppressive agent used in renal transplantation. Gastrointestinal and hematological side effects are commonly observed, but hepatotoxicity has not been reported. In this study, we assessed MMF-related hepatotoxicity in renal transplant recipients. A total of 124 renal transplantation recipients (RTRs) were evaluated for elevated liver enzymes associated with MMF, and 79 patients were enrolled to the study. Patients used MMF 2 g/day. The patients who had progressive increase in liver enzymes after renal transplantation and their AST, ALT, GGT, ALP, bilirubin levels, hepatitis, cytomegalovirus (CMV), abdominal ultrasonography, duration of hepatotoxicity, and decreased dosage or withdrawal of MMF were recorded. Also, we evaluated their liver enzymes while the patients were on the waiting list. Of the 79 patients, 11 patients (13.9%) had a progressive increase in liver enzymes. The median (min-max) age of the patients with MMF-hepatotoxicity was 29 (19-54) and 72.7% of them were male. None of the patients had hepatitis B or C, CMV infection, or other possible causes for elevated liver enzymes and their abdominal ultrasonography were normal. High liver enzyme levels regressed after the withdrawal (n=6) or reduce dosage (n=5) of MMF. The median time of the increase in liver enzymes was 28 (4-70) days and after 50% reduction or withdrawal of MMF, returned to normal values in 16 (4-210) days. The median levels of ALT in waiting list (I), before (II), and after (III) reduction dosage or withdrawal of MMF were 22.0 (3-22), 222.0 (51-508), and 33.0 (21-64) U/L, respectively (p I-II=0.004,p I-II=0.013, andp II-III=0.005). There were no differences for ALP, GGT, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin levels. Also, the correlation between recovery time of ALT and persistence time of ALT elevation before adjustment of MMF was significant (r=0.739, p=0.009). Consequently, after renal transplantation, hepatotoxicity can occur due to a lot of reason including MMF usage. If hepatotoxicity related to MMF is not considered, especially in the early period of renal transplantation, resolution of hepatotoxicity can be required long term.

Effects of pentoxifylline on the cytokines that may play a role in rejection and resistive index in renal transplant recipients

Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor that inhibits the production of TNFalpha and IL6 and IL-10 cytokines. In renal rejection TNFalpha, IL-6, and IL-10 may have important roles. In this study, 22 renal transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus, prednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil were prescribed PTX (2 x 600 mg/d) for 3 months (GI), and 20 similar patients not receiving PTX were used as controls (GII). Stable subjects whose serum creatinine was lower than 1.8 mg/dL and were more than 6 months posttransplant, were enrolled into this study if the blood pressure was well controlled and there was no diabetes mellitus, infection, or inflammation. At the end of 3 months TNF-alpha decreased from 4.2 +/- 2.1 to 2.4 +/- 0.7 (P = .001) and 4.0 +/- 2.2 to 3.9 +/- 1.7 (P = .718), IL-10 also decreased from 3.90 +/- 1.9 to 2.38 +/- 0.6 (P = .001) and 4.02 +/- 1.6 to 3.82 +/- 1.5 (P = .225) in GI and GII, respectively. For IL-10 and TNF-alpha the alterations between baseline and the last visit of GI and GII were significant (P < .002 for all). Resistive index (RI) decreased in GI but the difference in alterations between baseline and the last visit of GI and GII was marginal. In summary IL-10 and TNF-alpha levels decreased in stable recipients treated with PTx. RI also decreased marginally secondary to PTx treatment. PTx was well tolerated and free side effects. PTx did not affect tacrolimus levels or other biochemical and hematological parameters.

Efficacy and Safety of Vardenafil in Renal Transplant Recipients With Erectile Dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) profoundly affects the quality of life. The prevalence of ED in renal transplant recipients is reported by high as 50% to 60%. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in these patients with ED as well as its effects on graft function and on cylosporine or tacrolimus concentrations. Thirty-nine recipients with ED and serum creatinine values<2 mg/dL were treated with vardenafil. ED was assessed using the self-administered International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). ED was diagnosed by using penile color-Doppler ultrasonography and intracavernosal injection. Vardenafil efficacy was assessed by readministering the IIEF questionnaire after 4 weeks of therapy. Serum creatinine levels, creatinine clearances, and cyclosporine/tacrolimus concentrations were measured before and after vardenafil therapy. Twenty-one recipients with ED served as placebo controls and 15 without ED as another control group. The IIEF scores improved from 12.80+/-3.5 to 26.46+/-2.4 in vardenafil-treated patients with ED (P<.001). Renal function and cyclosporine/tacrolimus concentrations did not change with vardenafil therapy. Side effects were observed in 7 (18%) patients: headache in three, palpitations in one, flushing in two, and dyspepsia in one. This study demonstrated that ED improved with vardenafil in renal transplant recipients with ED. For 4 weeks vardenafil therapy was free of side effects. Renal function tests did not change. Also, no dose change in immunosuppressive drugs was required during 4 weeks of verdanafil therapy.

Dyslipidemia and weight gain secondary to lifestyle changes in living renal transplant donors

We evaluated renal function, lipid profile, body weight, and physical activity of living donors in long-term follow-up after nephrectomy. A total of 121 living donors were compared with 81 healthy subjects with normal renal function and no history of any surgery or disease. Before and after donor nephrectomies, we recorded age, body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, lipids, and serum glucose levels of the donors. Preoperative (baseline) and postoperative (last visit) physical activities of donors and controls were evaluated through the Modified Baecke Questionnaire (occupational activities, sports activities, leisure-time activities). There were no differences between donors and controls for age (P = .772), gender (P = .927), and follow-up period (P = .564). According to baseline levels, blood pressure and serum creatinine were increased and creatinine clearance was decreased (P < .001 for all). The mean increases in body weight (P = .012), LDL (P = .004), and triglyceride (P < .001) were higher in donors than in controls. But the mean decrease in HDL was not different between controls and donors (P = .057). Indices of sports and total activities were lower in donors than in controls on the last visit (P < .001). Indices of occupational and leisure-time activities were similar on the last visit in donors and in controls (P = .126, P = .083). The alterations in total cholesterol and total activity showed significant negative correlations in donors (r = -.581, P < .001). Also, the alterations in total cholesterol and body weight showed a significant correlation (r = .25, P = .02). We followed donors together with serum lipid levels, body weight, and total physical activities as well as blood pressure and renal function tests.

Morbidity of flank incision in 100 renal donors

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the morbidity of lumbotomy incision used in the last 100 living related donor nephrectomies retrospectively.

METHODS

Since March 1991, 100 donor nephrectomies were made to living donors with lumbar incision. Incisions made in lateral decubitus position, subcostally or by an 11th or 12th rib resection. Left nephrectomy to 83, and right nephrectomy to 17 donors was performed. In 2 patients, there had been a peritoneal defect which was closed with primary sutures. In 19 patients 3 cm or shorter and in 5 patients longer than 3 cm of pleural entry had occurred. In all of the patients laceration was repaired without placement of a chest tube, however a chest tube had to be placed in 2 donors after obtaining a control chest x-ray postoperatively.

RESULTS

All the patients mobilized and began to take orally in the first post-operative day. Wound infection, pneumonia and deep vein thrombosis had detected in none of the patients. The patients were discharged on the 4th and 5th postoperative day. During their control after 1 month from the operation it was found that all of them had returned to their daily life. In the postoperative period incisional hernia occurred in 7 patients which didn't need surgical repair and none of them complained of cosmetic problem. There was no any other late term complication was seen due to flank incision.

CONCLUSION

Lumbotomy incision in donor nephrectomy, either a rib resection or supracostal approach, is reliable, provides excellent exposure for surgeon and has minimal morbidity.