The pedicled buccal fat pad in oral reconstruction

AIM

Aim of the study was to present a follow-up on 46 cases in which pedical buccal fat pad (BFP) flaps were used to repair oral defects without any additional local flaps or skin grafts.

METHODS

The study comprised 46 patients, 31 men and 15 women, with an age range of 30-78 years (mean age 57.3 years). They were treated with a pedicled flap to repair defects of the ipsilateral maxilla (anterior or posterior), soft palate or retromolar mandibular area following tumor resection, osteonecrosis or the closure of oro-antral fistulae. The defects ranged from 2 × 2.5 cm to 4.5 × 5 cm. All patients were treated under general anesthesia.

RESULTS

The flap fully covered the intraoral defect with any aesthetic deficits. After one month, the flap was fully epithelialized and of adequate thickness in all cases. Three postoperative complications were reported: one superficial necrosis and two small fistulae.

CONCLUSION

Although the BFP has long been recognized and despite the simplicity of preparing the flap itself, numerically significant reports concerning the use of this technique in reconstructive facial surgery have only recently been published. The pedicled buccal fat flap is convenient and reliably repairs oral defects up to 4.5 cm in diameter on the ipsilateral side of the soft and hard palate, posterior alveolar region of the maxilla and the retromolar mandibular area. The surgical procedure is simple and morbidity at the donor site in not significant.

Edentulous mandible: clinical results of reconstruction with fresh frozen bone

AIM

The aim of this study was the clinical and radiological evaluation in severe mandibular atrophy (class V-VI Cadwood-Howell) of bone grafts with homologous fresh frozen bone (FFB) in patients with dysesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve with or without transposition of the NAI in order to perform a proper implant-prosthetic rehabilitation.

METHODS

This article presents our experience in mandibular reconstructions performed in 12 patients with severe mandibular atrophy and dysesthesia performing onlay grafts with FFB and subsequent implant-prosthetic rehabilitation.

RESULTS

The surgical protocol of homologous bone graft in symptomatic patients with severe mandibular atrophy presented an excellent clinical outcome with disappearance of dysesthesia in all patients treated, good graft integration and a complete implant-prosthetic rehabilitation with loss of only 3 implants at the 24-36 month follow up visit.

CONCLUSION

Homologous bone grafting in patients with severe mandibular atrophy may be a viable therapeutic option in cases of prosthetic reconstruction in those symptomatic patients who cannot tolerate removable dentures, reducing intraoperative time, patient morbidity and the complications in common sites of autologous bone graft removal.

[Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance in the study of parotid masses]

One hundred and seven patients were examined to compare advantages and pitfalls of the imaging methods currently used to stage parotid masses. Thirty patients underwent US and CT, 44 were investigated with US and MRI and 33 with US, CT and MRI. The accuracy of the three techniques was analyzed in detecting and assessing the intra-/extraglandular location of the parotid lesions and their benign/malignant nature. The intraglandular lesion spread to superficial/deep lobes was also investigated, together with its relationship to the surrounding structures. The findings were correlated with the cytohistological data from US-guided biopsy or from surgical resection. US was less accurate than CT and MRI, the latter being not statistically superior to the former. Because of the low incidence of pitfalls, US with fine-needle aspiration cytology should be the technique of choice; CT and MRI must be used for lesions > 3 cm or for masses in the deep gland lobes. In conclusion, CT accurately assesses parotid lesions but MRI demonstrates the relationship to adjacent structures better.

A controlled clinical study of the efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide vs naproxen in maxillo-facial surgery

The anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy of nimesulide was assessed and compared with that of naproxen in the postoperative treatment of inflammatory complications of maxillo-facial surgery in a double-blind study. A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with nimesulide (100mg twice daily) or naproxen (250mg twice daily) for 6 to 14 days. Treatment with either drug prevented the development of, or ameliorated the signs and symptoms associated with, the inflammatory process (spontaneous pain, difficulty in chewing and swallowing, swelling, hyperaemia, muscle contracture, poor sleep quality). Indeed, most patients experienced complete resolution of their signs and symptoms. The efficacy of nimesulide was considered to be superior to that of naproxen, although both drugs were tolerated equally well.